Physician payment policies: impacts and implications

Rural residents' willingness to participate in basic medical insurance and influential factors: A survey of three provinces in China

Background

Rural residents' participation in medical insurance has a significant relationship to the affordability of their medical care. This study aims to investigate the willingness of rural residents to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents and its determinants so as to enhance their willingness to participate in medical insurance.

Methods

Data were obtained from 1,077 validated questionnaires from rural residents. Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression analysis were adopted to analyze determinants of rural residents' willingness to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents.

Results

94.3% of respondents were willing to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents and this was associated with the familiarity with the medical insurance policies [OR = 2.136, 95% CI (1.143, 3.989)], the reasonability of medical insurance premiums [OR = 2.326, 95% CI (0.998, 5.418)], the normality of doctors' treatment behavior [OR = 3.245, 95% CI (1.339, 7.867)] and the medical insurance's effectiveness in reducing the economic burden of disease [OR = 5.630, 95% CI (2.861, 11.079)].

Conclusion

Even though most respondents were willing to participate in basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents, some aspects need to be improved. The focus should be on promoting and regulating the behavior of medical staff. Financing policies and reimbursement of treatment costs need to be more scientifically developed. A comprehensive basic healthcare system needs to be optimized around the core function of "hedging financial risks".

Determinants of inappropriate admissions of children to county hospitals: a cross-sectional study from rural China

BACKGROUND

The incidence of inappropriate admissions in China has become the shackle of its' service supply system. This research aims to assess the level of children's inappropriate admissions to county hospitals in rural China and identify the characteristics and determinants of children's inappropriate admissions.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on data of children aged 0-14 years. A total of 771 children medical records in four county hospitals was collected by stratified random sampling in Midwestern China and was evaluated through the Rural Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol. A questionnaire survey was conducted among doctors whose names were shown in medical records. Chi-square test was used to analyse the characteristics of inappropriate admissions, and a binary logistic regression model was used to examine the determinants of inappropriate admissions.

RESULTS

Inappropriate admissions indicate that patients who could have been treated as outpatients received services as inpatients. The average rate for inappropriate admissions of children in county hospitals was 61.35%. The highest rate of inappropriate admissions was found among children aged 1-5 years (68.42%). Inappropriate admissions mostly occurred in children with respiratory diseases (72.45%), circulatory diseases (72.22%) and certain infectious diseases and parasitic diseases (70.37%). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that county, normal health status, treating department, disease, the length of hospital stay and the doctor's self-evaluation on the understanding about the degree of the patient's feelings were determinants for children's inappropriate admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

County hospitals have a high rate of inappropriate admissions of children. The relationship of children's inappropriate admissions to age distribution and the insurance compensation is affected by disease and hospitalisation expenses, respectively. The determinants of children's inappropriate admissions are directly related to the weak level of primary care services in the health service system, the initial requirements requested by children's admission decision makers and the interests among medical institutions and doctors.

Penetrating the "black box": financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services

This article addresses the impact of financial incentives on physician behavior, focusing on quality of care. Changing market conditions, evolving social forces, and continuing organizational evolution in health services have raised societal awareness and expectations concerning quality. This article proceeds in four parts. First, the authors place financial incentives in the context of broader forces shaping the quality of physician services. Second, the article reviews the literature on financial incentive effects on physician behavior. Third, a simple net income maximization model of physician choices is presented, from which are derived formal hypotheses regarding the effect of financial incentives on physician choices of quality per unit of physician service and the quantity of services per patient. The model is extended qualitatively to offer further hypotheses and research directions. Finally, gaps and limitations of the model and of the extant empirical research are articulated, and additional researchable questions are posed.

Healthcare economics for the emergency physician

Although the principles of healthcare economics are not usually part of the fundamental education of emergency physicians, an understanding of these elements will enhance our ability to contribute to improved health-care value. This article introduces the practical aspects of microeconomics, insurance, the supply-and-demand relationship, competition, and costs as they affect the practice of medicine on a daily basis. Being cognizant of how these elements create a dynamic interplay in the health-care industry will allow physicians to better understand the expanded role they need to assume in the ongoing cost and quality debate.

Risk assumption and physician alignment with health care organizations

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between risk assumption by individual physicians and physician groups and the degree of alignment between physicians and health care systems.

METHODS

A cross sectional comparative analysis using a sample of 1,279 physicians practicing in loosely affiliated arrangements and 1,781 physicians in 61 groups closely affiliated with 14 vertically integrated health systems. Measures of physician alignment were based on multiitem scales validated in previous studies and derived from surveys sent to individual physicians. Measures of risk assumption were developed from surveys sent to the administrator of each of the 61 physician groups in the sample and to physicians affiliated with these groups. Two stage Heckman models with fixed effects adjustments in the second stage were used to correct for sample selection and clustering respectively.

RESULTS

After accounting for selection, fixed effects, and group and individual controls, physicians in groups with larger proportional revenue from managed care displayed greater normative commitment and system loyalty than physicians in groups with lower proportional managed care revenue. Individual-level managed care risk was also positively related to both normative commitment and group behavioral commitment to the system. Physicians in groups with larger physician equity positions expressed lower levels of normative commitment to the system. Physician productivity compensation was negatively related to all measures of alignment. Finally, group emphasis on individually-based incentives for staff physicians was negatively related to system identification.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that organizations must balance individually-based risk schemes with those that emphasize the performance of the group and the system to achieve long-term goals of loyalty, identification, and commitment to the system.

CEO perceptions of competition--and strategic response in hospital markets

Physician-organization integration (POI) has emerged as a key issue for hospitals and health systems seeking to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of care. Although competition and managed care are often cited as primary market drivers of the adoption of POI strategies, prior research has shown only weak associations between these market attributes and POI. This article argues that the role of key organizational decision makers has not been adequately accounted for in explaining strategic change. The study examines the role of hospital CEO perceptions of competition in predicting the adoption of five different approaches to POI. CEO perceptions of general market competition are explained by a combination of market and organizational attributes. Furthermore, when controlling for objective characteristics of the environment and organization, CEO perceptions of competition have consistent, statistically significant associations with four of five measures of POI examined.

Effects of primary care coordination on public hospital patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of primary care coordination on utilization rates and satisfaction with care among public hospital patients.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized gatekeeper intervention, with 1-year follow-up.

SETTING

The Adult General Medical Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital, a university-affiliated public hospital.

PATIENTS

We studied 2,293 established patients of 28 primary care physicians.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized based on their primary care physician's main clinic day. The 1,121 patients in the intervention group (Ambulatory Patient-Physician Relationship Organized to Achieve Coordinated Healthcare [APPROACH] group) required primary care physician approval to receive specialty and emergency department (ED) services; 1,172 patients in the control group did not.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Changes in outpatient, ED, and inpatient utilization were measured for APPROACH and control groups over the 1-year observation period, and the differences in the changes between groups were calculated to estimate the effect of the intervention. Acceptability of the gatekeeping model was determined via patient satisfaction surveys.

RESULTS

Over the 1-year observation period, APPROACH patients decreased their specialty use by 0.57 visits per year more than control patients did ( P =.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.05 to -0.01). While APPROACH patients increased their primary care use by 0.27 visits per year more than control patients, this difference was not statistically significant (P =.14; 95% CI, -0.11 to 0.66). Changes in low-acuity ED care were similar between the two groups (0. 06 visits per year more in APPROACH group than control group, P =. 42; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.22). APPROACH patients decreased yearly hospitalizations by 0.14 visits per year more than control patients (P =.02; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.03). Changes in patient satisfaction with care, perceived access to specialists, and use of out-of-network services between the 2 groups were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

A primary care model of health delivery in a public hospital that utilized a gatekeeping strategy decreased outpatient specialty and hospitalization rates and was acceptable to patients.