MR imaging of intersexuality

Role of Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) in Children with Ambiguous Genitalia

Objectives  Accurate delineation of anatomy in children with ambiguous genitalia early in life is important. This commonly involves conventional fluoroscopic genitogram (traumatic to the child) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination (involves sedation). In this study, our objectives were twofold: (1) to describe the findings on transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) in normal children and (2) to describe the findings on TPUS in children with ambiguous genitalia and correlate them with conventional genitogram. Materials and Methods  TPUS was prospectively performed in 10 children without genital ambiguity (5 girls and 5 boys). Subsequently, 15 consecutive children having disorders of sex differentiation (DSDs) with genital ambiguity underwent TPUS. The presence or absence of müllerian structures was documented. Of these patients, 14 also underwent conventional genitogram as a part of routine evaluation. The gold standard was established either by comparison with surgical findings (in patients who underwent surgery) or by comparison with a combination of findings on genitogram and transabdominal ultrasound in patients who did not undergo surgery. Results  In all normal children, lower urogenital tracts could be clearly delineated on TPUS. Out of the 15 children with ambiguous genitalia, TPUS could establish the presence/absence of müllerian structures in 14. This was concordant with findings on conventional genitogram/surgery. In one patient, müllerian structure was missed on TPUS but demonstrated on genitogram. In two children, TPUS showed the müllerian structure, which was not seen on genitogram. When both the controls and the cases were combined, TPUS had an accuracy of 95% and specificity of 100% in the detection of müllerian structures. Conclusion  TPUS is feasible and accurate in demonstration of lower urogenital tract anatomy in children with DSDs having ambiguous genitalia. It can be performed without sedation, and is suitable for use as a screening modality in children with ambiguous genitalia.

Imaging of female infertility: a pictorial guide to the hysterosalpingography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings of the congenital and acquired causes of female infertility

Hysterosalpingography is the gold standard in assessing the patency of the fallopian tubes, which is among the most common causes of female factor infertility, making this technique the most frequent first-choice imaging modality in the assessment of female infertility. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are typically used for evaluation of indeterminate or complicated cases of female infertility and presurgical planning. Imaging also plays a role in the detection of the secondary causes of ovarian factor infertility, including endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Imaging of disorder of sex development

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Disorders of sex development (DSDs), formerly termed ambiguous genitalia, are a group of conditions where the external genitalia appear abnormal. It represents a true medical and social emergency that needs a multidisciplinary team approach for elucidation. The pediatric radiologist plays an important role in defining the genital anatomy that remains one of the most important factors in sex determination, in addition to chromosomal analysis.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

A retrospective study, conducted between January 1995 and December 2010.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Imaging studies (ultrasound, genitogram, and/or magnetic resonance imaging) were performed in patients with ambiguous genitalia, confirmed by chromosomal analysis and appropriate hormonal investigations.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of ultrasound is 89.5%, while its specificity reaches 100%. Retrograde genitogram is more invasive and less sensitive, as the yield of determining the presence of a uterus +/- vagina is 84.2%. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive for gonadal tissue identification. Its specificity reaches up to 100% and can provide detailed internal structures (uterus, fallopian tubes, and gonads).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound examination is still the main modality of choice for screening patients with ambiguous genitalia. It is cheap and readily available everywhere. In addition to elucidating the uterus in 89.5%, it can also give more information on the adrenal glands. However, genitography is good--84.2% in elucidating genital anatomy--but it gives no information of the gonads and it is time consuming and invasive. MRI is helpful in cases with equivocal ultrasound, reaches 100% in elucidating internal extractor, and therefore could be reserved for that.

MR Imaging of Disorders Associated with Female Infertility: Use in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has extended the usefulness of imaging in evaluation of pelvic disorders associated with female infertility. The causes of female infertility include ovulatory disorders (ie, pituitary adenoma and polycystic ovarian syndrome), disorders of the fallopian tubes (ie, hydrosalpinx and pelvic inflammatory disease), uterine disorders (ie, müllerian duct anomaly, adenomyosis, and leiomyoma), and pelvic endometriosis. Although laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography, and transvaginal ultrasonography are the most effective techniques for evaluation of pelvic disorders related to female infertility, MR imaging is used in a variety of clinical settings in diagnosis, treatment, and management. The applications of MR imaging include evaluation of the functioning uterus and ovaries, visualization of pituitary adenomas, differentiation of müllerian duct anomalies, and accurate noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis, leiomyoma, and endometriosis. In addition, MR imaging helps predict the outcome of conservative treatment for adenomyosis, leiomyoma, and endometriosis and may lead to selection of better treatment plans and management. Finally, MR imaging may serve as an adjunct to diagnostic laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography in patients with hydrosalpinx, peritubal adhesions, or pelvic adhesions related to endometriosis.