Delayed adverse reaction to contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective single-center study comparison to control group without enhancement

Contrast Reactions and Approaches to Staffing the Contrast Reaction Management Team

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Managing contrast reactions is critical as contrast reactions can be life-threatening and unpredictable. Institutions need an effective system to handle these events. Currently, there is no standard practice for assigning trainees, radiologists, non-radiologist physicians, or other non-physician providers for management of contrast reaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Association of Academic Radiologists (AAR) created a task force to address this gap. The AAR task force reviewed existing practices, studied available literature, and consulted experts related to contrast reaction management. The Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) members were surveyed using a questionnaire focused on staffing strategies for contrast reaction management.

RESULTS

The task force found disparities in contrast reactions management across institutions and healthcare providers. There is a lack of standardized protocols for assigning personnel for contrast reaction management.

CONCLUSION

The AAR task force suggests developing standardized protocols for contrast reaction management. The protocols should outline clear roles for different healthcare providers involved in these events.

Bridging the gap between bench and clinic: the importance of understanding the mechanism of iodinated contrast media hypersensitivity

Since the advent of CT, iodinated contract media (ICM) has become one of the most regularly administered intravenous medications in clinical settings. Although considered generally safe, ICM is one of the most common causes of adverse drug reactions in clinical practice, accounting for more than 2 million adverse reactions worldwide. Currently, there are few useful tools to diagnose patient hypersensitivity, with the major limitation being the lack of consensus regarding the mechanisms of hypersensitivity to ICM. While there is an overwhelming abundance of literature pertaining to clinical features including incidence, symptomatology, and risk, few studies have further investigated the underlying mechanisms behind their clinical observations. Of the available literature discussing pathophysiology, most primary studies were completed over 20 years ago, since which the molecular characteristics of ICM have changed. Furthermore, many reviews mentioning pathophysiology fail to adequately emphasize the clinical importance of understanding the molecular pathways involved in hypersensitivity. In this review, we aim to emphasize the clinical relevance of pathophysiology as it relates to the prediction and diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to ICM. To this end, we will first briefly characterize hypersensitivity reactions to ICM with respect to epidemiology and clinical presentation. We will then present the existing evidence supporting various proposed mechanisms of hypersensitivity, highlighting the gaps that remain in the mechanistic delineation of both immediate and delayed reactions. Finally, we discuss the possibility of in vitro testing as a way to predict and diagnose hypersensitivity reactions, pending a more complete elucidation of mechanisms.

Assessing the skin irritation and sensitizing potential of concentrates of water chlorinated in the presence of iodinated X-ray contrast media

Chemical disinfection of water provides significant public health benefits. However, disinfectants like chlorine can react with naturally occurring materials in the water to form disinfection byproducts (DBPs). Natural levels of iodine have been reported to be too low in some source waters to account for the levels of iodinated DBPs detected. Iodinated X-ray contrast media (ICM) have been identified as a potential source of iodine. The toxicological impact of ICM present in source water at the time of disinfection has not been fully investigated. Iopamidol, iohexol, iopromide, and diatrizoate are among the ICM most frequently detected in water. In this study, source water containing one of these four ICM was chlorinated; non-chlorinated ICM-containing water samples served as controls. Reactions were conducted at an ICM concentration of 5 µM and a chlorine dose of 100 µM over 72 hr. Water concentrates (20,000-fold) were prepared by XAD-resin/ethyl acetate extraction and DMSO solvent exchange. We used the MatTek® reconstituted human epithelial skin irritation model to evaluate the water concentrates and also assessed the dermal irritation and sensitization potential of these concentrates using the LLNA:BrdU ELISA in BALB/c mice. None of the water concentrates tested (2500X) resulted in a skin irritant response in the MatTek® skin irritation model. Likewise, none of the concentrates (2500X, 1250X, 625X, 312.5X, 156.25X) produced a skin irritation response in mice: erythema was minimal; the maximum increase in ear thickness was less than 25%. Importantly, none of the concentrates produced a positive threshold response for allergic skin sensitization at any concentration tested in the LLNA:BrdU ELISA. We conclude that concentrates of water disinfected in the presence of four different ICM did not cause significant skin irritation or effects consistent with skin sensitization at the concentrations tested.

Radiomics Study for Differentiating Focal Hepatic Lesions Based on Unenhanced CT Images

Objectives

To investigate the feasibility of computer-aided discriminative diagnosis among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic metastasis, hepatic hemangioma, hepatic cysts, hepatic adenoma, and hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia, based on radiomics analysis of unenhanced CT images.

Methods

452 patients with 77 with HCC, 104 with hepatic metastases, 126 with hepatic hemangioma, 99 with hepatic cysts, 24 with FNH, 22 with HA, who underwent CT examination from 2016 to 2018, were included. Radcloud Platform was used to extract radiomics features from manual delineation on unenhanced CT images. Most relevant radiomic features were selected from 1409 via LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator). The whole dataset was divided into training and testing set with the ratio of 8:2 using computer-generated random numbers. Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to establish the classifier.

Results

The computer-aided diagnosis model was established based on radiomic features of unenhanced CT images. 27 optimal discriminative features were selected to distinguish the six different histopathological types of all lesions. The classifiers had good diagnostic performance, with the area under curve (AUC) values greater than 0.900 in training and validation groups. The overall accuracy of the training and testing set about differentiating the six different histopathological types of all lesions was 0.88 and 0.76 respectively. 34 optimal discriminative were selected to distinguish the benign and malignant tumors. The overall accuracy in the training and testing set was 0.89and 0.84 respectively.

Conclusions

The computer-aided discriminative diagnosis model based on unenhanced CT images has good clinical potential in distinguishing focal hepatic lesions with noninvasive radiomic features.

Safety of intravenous iodinated contrast medium injection in rabbits undergoing conscious computed tomography

Background

Contrast media in CT is widely used in dogs and cats to provide superior tissue delineation and increase the diagnostic capabilities. These contrast‐enhanced imaging techniques are gaining popularity in rabbits; published studies reporting the safety of doing so are lacking.

Methods

This retrospective observational study aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events following the intravenous administration of iodinated non‐ionic contrast medium in 350 rabbits. The medical records of this subset of rabbits admitted between January 2009 and November 2018, that underwent CT examination and received intravenous contrast media, were evaluated.

Results

From the 350 rabbits, 342 rabbits were still alive 7 days after the scan. A total of eight rabbits died within 7 days of the scan, seven of which within the first 24 h. All deaths were presumed to be sequelae to the diseases they were being investigated for and not thought to be related to the administration of intravenous contrast medium.

Conclusions

The results indicated that the use of intravenous non‐iodinated contrast medium was well tolerated and safe in rabbits undergoing conscious CT examination.

Iodixanol activation of mast cells: Implications in the pathogenesis of iodixanol-induced delayed cutaneous adverse reactions

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is widely used in radiological examination and interventional therapy. In the commonly used ICM, iodixanol is considered to be the safer one. However, compared with other ICMs, it has a higher incidence of delayed cutaneous adverse reactions. The underlying mechanisms are unclear. In this study, mice with positive allergic reactions were selected based on the mouse clinical allergy symptom score and skin and blood samples taken 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after ICMs (6 g iodine/kg) injection for histological and blood analyses. ICMs-induced pseudo-allergic reactions were investigated through in vivo intravital vascular imaging and passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) not mediated by IgE and through, calcium imaging degranulation of mast cells (MCs), and western blot assays in vitro. Results shows iodixanol-induced systemic anaphylaxis caused severe extravasation of plasma proteins and degranulation of skin MCs, and increased levels of plasma histamine, cytokines and inflammatory chemokines. Mechanistically, iodixanol increases degranulation of MCs and promotes the synthesis of inflammatory factors by activating PLC-γ and PI3K-related pathways. Trigonelline inhibit iodixanol-induced MC-related pseudo-allergic reactions in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that mice in the iodixanol group had a higher incidence of delayed cutaneous reactions, characterized by cytokine release over time and delayed cutaneous MC degranulation. Iodixanol's delayed cutaneous adverse reactions may be due to a delayed phase of MC-related pseudo-allergic reactions. Trigonelline revealed anti-allergic activity in iodixanol-induced MC-related pseudo-allergic reactions.

Incidence and risk factors of late adverse reactions to low-osmolar contrast media: A prospective observational study of 10,540 exposures

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of late adverse reactions (ARs) to non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM).

METHODS

The occurrence of late AR was monitored on day 1 and from day 7 to day 28 in all patients who received enhanced computed tomography using LOCM during a 5-week study period in a single tertiary hospital. Patients who experienced late AR were followed up for three years.

RESULTS

Among the total 10,540 LOCM exposures, 315 ARs (3.0%) were reported; acute ARs occurred in 108 LOCM exposures (1.0%) and late ARs occurred in 207 LOCM exposures (2.0%) (90.9% within one week, 9.1% developed afterwards by day 20). Previous history of drug allergy (odds ratio [OR] = 4.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-9.71) and allergic diseases (OR = 2.54; 95% CI 1.32-4.91) were risk factors of late ARs to LOCM. Although the recurrence rate was lowered with premedication from 8.5% to 1.7% (8/94 vs. 3/178; p = 0.016), LOCM change did not make difference compared to reuse of the culprit LOCM (2/38 vs. 9/234; p = 0.655). In patients with a history of late AR to LOCM, the risk of recurrent reactions decreased with longer time intervals between exposures (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97; p = 0.025) and with the use of antihistamine premedication (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.06-0.99; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Late ARs to LOCM occurred mostly within one week. The use of premedication may be helpful in reducing the recurrence of late ARs.

Inherent clinical properties of non-immediate hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media

BACKGROUND

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is a frequently used compound in radiology. Non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) appear when a patient leaves the department and usually are undocumented. True hypersensitivity in this group is rarely proved.

METHODS

Single-centre 2014-2018 data were retrospectively analysed. HSR to ICM were classified and investigated according to the time of occurrence (immediate <1 hour, non-immediate >1 hour). ENDA questionnaire and skin tests (prick or intradermal test) were performed according to ENDA/EAACI recommendations.

RESULTS

69 patients with a clinical history of HSR to ICM were identified, 72.46% were females (n = 50). The average age was 56 (SD ± 13.16) years. Non-immediate HSR occurred in 28.99% (n = 20) patients. The suspected culprit drugs were: iodixanol 20% (n = 4), iopromide 5% (n = 1), diatrizoate 10% (n = 2) and iohexol 10% (n = 2). Among non-immediate HSR 96.00% (n = 19) of patients had skin rashes. A statistically significant correlation was found between the clinical symptoms and the type of reaction (p-value <0.05): isolated skin manifestations mostly occurred in non-immediate HSR 75.00% (n = 15). Only 13.04% (n = 9) of all the patients were proved to be allergic to a certain ICM after the proposed diagnostic workup.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of the hypersensitivity reactions investigated were classified as non-immediate type. Most of them manifested with isolated skin symptoms. The most frequent culprit drug encountered was iodixanol. The overall non-immediate hypersensitivity confirmation rate after diagnostic evaluation was only 15%.

Feasibility of Cardiac Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Ventricular Function in Postoperative Children With Congenital Heart Disease: Comparison With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVE

We explored the feasibility of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) to evaluate postoperative ventricular function in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of CCT using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a reference.

METHODS

Thirty-two postoperative children with CHD (20 boys and 12 girls) who underwent CMR and CCT were enrolled. Left and right ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, and cardiac index were measured using cardiac function analysis software. Cardiac function data were compared between CMR and CCT. The agreement between the 2 modalities was assessed using a Bland-Altman analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in CCT functional measurements.

RESULTS

All functional parameters showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) and were well-correlated (r > 0.5, P < 0.05) between CMR and CCT. The mean values of all ventricular function parameters in CCT were higher compared with CMR. As indicated by 95% limits of agreement, left ventricular function parameters showed a better level of agreement compared with right ventricular function parameters between the 2 modalities. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were excellent in CCT measurements for all functional parameters (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the criterion standard of CMR, CCT is feasible for assessing postoperative ventricular function with sufficient diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in children with CHD. In addition to its important role regarding anatomical characterization, CCT is a suitable alternative and convenient follow-up tool that can be used to functional evaluation in children who are intolerant with CMR or have contraindications to CMR.

Pharmacological prevention of delayed hypersensitivity reactions caused by iodinated contrast media

Background

Delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to radiocontrast media (RCM) occur in approximately 0.5–23.0% of patients and are thought to be caused by T cell-mediated mechanisms. However, an optimal pharmacological preventive strategy is not yet established in patients with histories of delayed reactions to RCM.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological prevention in patients with histories of delayed reactions to non-ionic low-osmolar RCM when re-exposed to RCM.

Methods

A retrospective review of electronic medical records of 117 patients with previous histories of DHRs to RCM who visited an allergy clinic for the prevention of reactions after the re-exposure to RCM was conducted. The effects of pharmacological prevention were compared according to the symptom scores of previous reactions based on their intensities and durations with electronic medical records (EMRs).

Results

Of the 117 patients who experienced DHRs after RCM injection, we confirmed the outcomes of RCM re-exposure in 101 patients. For pharmacological prevention, 92 patients (91.1%) received steroids before RCM injection and among them, 50 patients (49.5%) received additional steroids after RCM injection. With this pharmacological prevention, patients of symptoms improved or no recurrence, recurrence of similar previous symptoms, and recurrence of worse symptoms were 98 (97.0%), 2 (2.0%), and 1 (1.0%), respectively. The proportions of no recurrence after pharmacological prevention were lower in patients with severe reactions and higher symptom scores.

Conclusion

Pharmacological prevention showed a beneficial effect in most patients with delayed hypersensitivity to RCM. Further investigations are needed to establish an effective protocol for the prevention of delayed reactions to RCM.

Learning Tubule-Sensitive CNNs for Pulmonary Airway and Artery-Vein Segmentation in CT

Training convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for segmentation of pulmonary airway, artery, and vein is challenging due to sparse supervisory signals caused by the severe class imbalance between tubular targets and background. We present a CNNs-based method for accurate airway and artery-vein segmentation in non-contrast computed tomography. It enjoys superior sensitivity to tenuous peripheral bronchioles, arterioles, and venules. The method first uses a feature recalibration module to make the best use of features learned from the neural networks. Spatial information of features is properly integrated to retain relative priority of activated regions, which benefits the subsequent channel-wise recalibration. Then, attention distillation module is introduced to reinforce representation learning of tubular objects. Fine-grained details in high-resolution attention maps are passing down from one layer to its previous layer recursively to enrich context. Anatomy prior of lung context map and distance transform map is designed and incorporated for better artery-vein differentiation capacity. Extensive experiments demonstrated considerable performance gains brought by these components. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, our method extracted much more branches while maintaining competitive overall segmentation performance. Codes and models are available at http://www.pami.sjtu.edu.cn/News/56.

Iodine allergy: Common misperceptions

Disclaimer

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose

The current evidence regarding iodine-containing compounds and iodine allergy cross-reactivity is reviewed.

Summary

Iodine is an essential human nutrient found in the thyroid gland. It is used in the synthesis of the thyroid hormones thyroxine and triiodothyroxine. Patients who report having adverse reactions to iodine-containing substances are often labelled as having an “iodine allergy,” which can result in delays in care or patients being denied essential ICM or other iodine-containing drugs. A literature review was conducted to evaluate the evidence regarding iodine allergy and iodine-containing drugs. Of 435 articles considered potentially appropriate for full review (plus 12 additional articles included on the basis of references from the eligible articles), 113 could not be obtained. After exclusion of 353 articles that did not meet all inclusion criteria, the remaining 81 articles were included in the review. The results of the literature review indicated that iodine has not been shown to be the allergen responsible for allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media, amiodarone, povidone-iodine, and other iodine-containing compounds.

Conclusion

There is a lack of evidence to support cross-reactivity between iodine-containing compounds in so called iodine-allergic individuals.

DRESS and AGEP Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media: A French Case Series

BACKGROUND

Drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESSs) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) are potentially severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical findings and sensitization profiles of DRESS and AGEP patients who had been administered iodinated contrast media (ICM).

METHODS

All adult patients in the dermatologist's French Investigators for Skin Adverse Reactions to Drugs (FISARD) network diagnosed with a DRESS or AGEP highly suspected to have been caused by an ICM were included retrospectively.

RESULTS

Thirteen DRESS patients and 19 AGEP patients who had been administered ICM were included, and the median delay in DRESS and AGEP occurrence after ICM administration was short, 4 and 1 days, respectively. Five AGEP patients had systemic involvement. A high cosensitization rate (46%) was observed among the DRESS patients, mainly with beta-lactam antibiotics. Overall, 77% of our patients were sensitized to several ICM. Patch tests identified the suspected ICM for 21 cases (72%). The retrospective nature, the limited number of subjects, the absence of a control group of healthy individuals, and the lack of detailed information on previous exposure to sensitizing drugs are limitations of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a large series of DRESSs and AGEPs related to ICM administration. Skin tests appear useful for diagnosis and potentially to identify alternative ICM.

Contrast Reaction Readiness for Your Department or Facility

Moderate and severe contrast reactions are rare but can be life threatening. Appropriate contrast reaction management is necessary for the best patient outcome. This review summarizes the types and incidences of adverse events to contrast media, treatment algorithms, and equipment needed to treat common contrast reactions, the current status of contrast reaction management training, and preventative strategies to help mitigate adverse contrast events.

Nonrenal Complications of Contrast Media

Injection of contrast media is the foundation of invasive and interventional cardiovascular practice. Iodine-based contrast was first used in the 1920s for urologic procedures and examinations. The initially used agents had high ionic and osmolar concentrations, which led to significant side effects, namely nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. Newer contrast agents had lower ionic concentrations and lower osmolarity. Modifications to the ionic structure and iodine content led to the development of ionic low-osmolar, nonionic low-osmolar, and nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media. Contemporary contrast agents are better tolerated and produce fewer major side effects.

Management of Adverse Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media for Computed Tomography in Korean Referral Hospitals: A Survey Investigation

Objective

To evaluate the current status of managing adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) for computed tomography in referral hospitals in South Korea compared with hospitals in other countries.

Materials and Methods

This survey investigation involved 59 Korean and 15 overseas hospitals using guideline-based questionnaires consisting of 24 items in 7 main categories related to managing adverse reactions to ICM.

Results

Informed written consent with risk factor evaluation was appropriately performed in most of the Korean hospitals. There was considerable variability in assessing renal function across the hospitals; serum creatinine level was used as a reference in 76.4% of Korean hospitals. The Korean hospitals preferred a more stringent approach to determining normal renal function (p = 0.01), withholding metformin (p = 0.01), and fasting before ICM exposure (p < 0.001) compared with overseas hospitals. All the Korean hospitals had an emergency protocol and in-hospital system for adverse reactions to ICM. The Korean (87.7%) and overseas hospitals (100%) were similarly equipped with epinephrine (p = 0.332), but only 38.6% of Korean hospitals were equipped with a bronchodilator (p = 0.004). For patients with a previous hypersensitivity reaction to ICM, 62.3% of Korean hospitals pre-medicated with anti-histamine and corticosteroid according to the severity of the previous reaction, and changed the culprit ICM in 52.8%, while skin test was performed in 17%.

Conclusion

In general, Korean referral hospitals were well-prepared regarding informed consent, protocol, and an in-hospital system for managing adverse reactions to ICM. Nevertheless, there was considerable variability in details and management, thus requiring standardization by reflecting current guidelines.

The incidence of skin lesions in contrast media-induced chemical hypersensitivity

Contrast agents are used in radiology to increase the sensibility and specificity of radiological techniques. Some of these compounds have side effects that include organ toxicity (with kidney being the most affected organ) and hypersensitivity reactions. We performed multiple PubMed searches from January, 2008 to January, 2018 for studies regarding adverse reactions to compounds used as contrast agents in imagistic techniques. The initial research identified 929 records written in English. After further excluding 223 non-human studies, 292 articles that had irrelevant designs as reviews, meta-analysis, commentaries, editorials and case reports, 414 studies were selected for retrieval. After reading the abstracts, we excluded 363 studies as they had little relevance to the study. In total, 51 full-articles were assessed for eligible studies to be included. Finally, 20 articles were included in the analysis. In our systematic literature search the incidence of overall skin immediate reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) had an incidence between 1.15 and 0.12%, depending on the cohort analyzed in the studies. The percentage of cutaneous manifestations in the cohort that experienced immediate hypersensitivity reactions was between 33.33 and 87.7%. The most frequent skin manifestations were urticaria, rashes, pruritus and limited facial edema. Non-iodinated contrast agents have a safer profile compared with ICM, the incidence of immediate adverse reactions being very low in gadolinium-based contrast agents and other agents used for contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The incidence of delayed reactions was between 10.1 and 0.03%. In the studies analyzed by us the main adverse reactions due to delayed hypersensitivity phenomena were cutaneous manifestations that were present between 70.27 and 100% of the cases. Regarding the risk factors for developing immediate adverse reactions, being female was a predisposing factor accompanied by history of allergy and history of reactions to contrast media. An accurate anamnesis of the patients and a correctly conducted pretreatment can limit the incidence and the severity of the adverse reactions and also can avoid the life occurrence of life-threatening reactions.

The Prevention and Management of Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Mini-review of the Literature

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury, also called contrast-induced nephropathy, is one of the main causes of acute renal failure/acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients within 48 to 72 hours of contrast media administration during various radiologic procedures. Several factors can be responsible for contrast-induced acute tubular necrosis (ATN); however, patient and procedure-related factors play the lead role in determining the development of contrast-induced nephropathy. There is no definitive treatment and hydration remains the mainstay preventive strategy. This article will review the incidence, criteria for definitive diagnosis, and an effective approach on how to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in a clinical setup.

Cytotoxicity of radiocontrast dyes in human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

Radiocontrast dyes are used for a wide range of diagnostic procedures for enhancing the image of anatomical structures, pain targets, and vascular uptake. While some of these dyes show toxicity to primary cells, their effect on stem cells, particularly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), is unknown. This study investigates the cytotoxic effects of two clinically used radiocontrast dyes, iohexol and iopamidol, on bone marrow and human umbilical cord MSCs. Exposure to these dyes significantly affected morphology of MSCs from both sources, as treated cells appeared transparent and no longer fibroblastoid. Cell viability decreased as determined by trypan blue and Annexin-V/PI staining, in a dose dependent manner with simultaneous loss of CD90 and CD105 concurrent with spontaneous differentiation in MSCs treated with iohexol and iopamidol. In addition, significantly higher cell death was observed in MSCs exposed to iopamidol than iohexol. At a concentration of 1:1, iohexol and iopamidol induced apoptosis in 19% and 92% (<.01) of MSCs, respectively. Global transcriptome analysis of treated MSCs revealed 139 and 384 differentially expressed genes in iohexol vs control and iopamidol vs control at p ≤ .01 and 1.5-fold, respectively. This suggested that iopamidol had more significant effect on the transcription of MSCs. Based on these results a molecular mechanism of radiocontast dye induced cell death via intrinsic apoptosis pathway mediated by p53 was proposed. Since iopamidol was significantly more toxic than iohexol in human MSCs, a more careful examination of safety of radiocontrast dyes for clinical use is warranted.

Can Ultrasound With Contrast Enhancement Replace Nonenhanced Computed Tomography Scans in Patients With Contraindication to Computed Tomography Contrast Agents?

Purpose

Our purpose is to determine the efficacy of ultrasound (US), with the addition of contrast enhancement (CEUS), in the identification and characterization of abdominal pathology compared with nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) scan (NECT).

Methods

This prospective cohort study recruited 197 patients with NECT, the majority with renal failure, to have US, with addition of CEUS, if focal pathology was detected, occurring in 145 patients. Nonenhanced CT scan, US, and CEUS images/video files were presented to 2 blinded readers, in anonymous order. Examination quality and positive observations were recorded. True diagnosis was determined with pathology, follow-up imaging, and clinical notes. Data analysis showed sensitivity of NECT and US in the identification and characterization of pathology and sensitivity of CEUS to characterize abnormalities.

Results

Most pathology involved liver (n = 87), kidney (n = 35), and peritoneum (n = 13). Ultrasound alone was superior to NECT in the identification of hepatic and renal pathology, with both performing poorly at characterization. With addition of CEUS, characterization of hepatic and renal pathology reached 100%. Nonenhanced CT is superior to US in identification of peritoneal pathology, especially in large patients. Further solid and hollow organ pathology identified and characterized was of insufficient size to draw conclusions.

Conclusions

Nonenhanced CT has limited ability to identify and characterize solid and hollow organ pathology. Ultrasound with the benefit of CEUS is superior to NECT in the characterization of focal liver, kidney, and peritoneal pathology. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound outperforms NECT in evaluation of suspect abdominal pathology in those with renal failure.

Iodinated contrast agents in patients with myasthenia gravis: a retrospective cohort study

Currently, it has not been satisfactorily established, whether modern low-osmolality iodinated contrast agents (ICAs) used in computed tomography (CT) studies are a risk factor for exacerbation of myasthenic symptoms. The rate of acute adverse events as well as delayed clinical worsening up to 30 days were analyzed in 73 patients with confirmed myasthenia gravis (MG) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT studies and compared to 52 patients who underwent unenhanced CT studies. One acute adverse event was documented. 12.3% of MG patients experienced a delayed exacerbation of symptoms after ICA administration. The rate of delayed severe exacerbation was higher in the contrast-enhanced group. Alternative causes for the exacerbation of MG-related symptoms were more likely than ICA administration in all cases. ICA administration for CT studies in MG patients should not be withheld if indicated, but patients particularly those with concomitant acute diseases should be carefully monitored for exacerbation of symptoms.

Renal Safety of Iodinated Contrast Media Depending on Their Osmolarity - Current Outlooks

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are commonly administered pharmaceutical agents. Most often they are used intravenously and intraarterially. Although iodinated contrast agents are relatively safe and widely used, adverse events occur and questions remain about their use, safety, and interactions. The most important adverse effects of contrast media include hypersensitivity reactions, thyroid dysfunction, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Radiologists must be aware of the risk factors for reactions to contrast media. Nonionic iodinated contrast agents can be divided into monomeric, low-osmolar, and dimeric, iso-osmolar classes. The osmotic characteristics of contrast media have been a significant focus in many investigations of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Diagnostic utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in two common renal tumors

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of common renal tumors. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging and DWI were performed on 85 patients with renal lesions (54 renal carcinoma and 31 renal angiomyolipoma cases). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in each case at b=800 sec/mm² were measured in the ADC maps using a statistical software package. The 54 cases of renal cell carcinoma showed a high signal intensity in the parenchyma, and the 31 renal angiomyolipoma cases showed a well-defined mixed signal intensity on DWI. The soft-tissue component showed a high signal intensity and the fat tissue showed a low signal intensity on DWI. When the b-value was set to 800 sec/mm², the mean ADC was significantly lower in the renal carcinoma cases than in the renal angiomyolipoma cases. In conclusion, the measurement of ADC on DWI can reveal the structure of renal tumors, which is beneficial in diagnosing and determining the prognosis of benign and malignant renal tumors.

Adverse reactions to intravenous contrast media: an unexpected discrepancy between inpatient and outpatient cohorts

Adverse reaction rates to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents are well published. However, there is no literature regarding systems-based changes to improve contrast reaction management. As part of ongoing quality improvement monitoring at our institution, contrast reaction events were reviewed. Contrast reactions for CT and MRI were captured at lower rates for the inpatient setting compared to outpatient by an order of a magnitude. The documented inpatient events were more likely to be severe in nature. Given this discrepancy, focus is being placed upon identifying potential barriers to capturing and appropriately managing inpatient contrast reactions.

Nonrenal Complications of Contrast Media

Nonrenal complications of contrast media are caused by chemotoxic or anaphylactoid reactions related to the contrast agent used. Chemotoxicity is mainly attributed to ionic concentration and osmolality. Anaphylactoid reactions are typically caused by direct activation of basophils, mast cells, and complement rather than an observable antigen-antibody interaction, and may be acute or delayed. History of an adverse reaction following prior exposure is the strongest predictor of a subsequent adverse reaction to contrast. Premedication regimens of corticosteroids or antihistamines can lower the risk of repeat adverse reactions. Treatment of anaphylactoid reactions depends on the severity of symptoms.

Side effects of radiographic contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors, and prevention

Radiocontrast media (RCM) are medical drugs used to improve the visibility of internal organs and structures in X-ray based imaging techniques. They may have side effects ranging from itching to a life-threatening emergency, known as contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We define CIN as acute renal failure occurring within 24-72 hrs of exposure to RCM that cannot be attributed to other causes. It usually occurs in patients with preexisting renal impairment and diabetes. The mechanisms underlying CIN include reduction in medullary blood flow leading to hypoxia and direct tubule cell damage and the formation of reactive oxygen species. Identification of patients at high risk for CIN is important. We have reviewed the risk factors and procedures for prevention, providing a long list of references enabling readers a deep evaluation of them both. The first rule to follow in patients at risk of CIN undergoing radiographic procedure is monitoring renal function by measuring serum creatinine and calculating the eGFR before and once daily for 5 days after the procedure. It is advised to discontinue potentially nephrotoxic medications, to choose radiocontrast media at lowest dosage, and to encourage oral or intravenous hydration. In high-risk patients N-acetylcysteine may also be given.

Immediate and nonimmediate reactions induced by contrast media: incidence, severity and risk factors

Background

The pattern of the contrast media-induced adverse reactions has not been investigated extensively in Mexico.

Objective

To estimate the incidence and the degree of severity of the adverse reactions to contrast media, administered for the first time, in hospitalized subjects.

Methods

We studied 99 patients longitudinally on whom computed tomography with contrast media (iopamidol) was carried out. The adverse reactions were identified by clinical examination; subsequently, they were classified as mild, moderate and severe, following the Manual on Contrast Media version 9 guides, and as immediate and nonimmediate. In addition, the vital functions, oxygen saturation, serum creatinine levels and the total number of eosinophils were measured before and after the procedure.

Results

The incidence of immediate and nonimmediate adverse reactions was of 26.3% and 10.1%, respectively. The mild immediate reactions were 18 (69.2%), the most common being the sensation of warmth, nausea and pruritus; among the more delayed reactions, nephrotoxicity stood out (5.1%). The serum creatinine median showed no difference either before or after the intravenous injection of contrast media (p = 0.13); in contrast, there was a significant difference in the total number of eosinophils (p ≤ 0.001). The values of high baseline systolic blood pressure and the diminished baseline amounts in pulse oximetry were significantly related with any type of the adverse reactions to contrast media.

Conclusion

The incidence of the adverse reactions to contrast media was greater with respect to previous reports; the majority of these reactions were of the immediate type and of a mild nature. The risk factors that have mostly been implicated in the adverse reactions to contrast media could not be identified in our cohort.

EADC Values in Diagnosis of Renal Lesions by 3.0 T Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Compared with the ADC Values

Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (EADC) is an indicator of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and reflects the pathological changes of tissues quantitatively. However, no study has been investigated in the space-occupying kidney disease using EADC values. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic role of EADC values at a high magnetic field strength (3.0 T) in kidney neoplastic lesions, compared with that of the ADC values. Ninety patients with suspected renal tumors (including 101 suspected renal lesions) and 20 healthy volunteers were performed MRI scanning. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed with a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequence at a diffusion gradient of b = 500 s/mm². We found renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can be distinguished from angiomyolipoma, and clear cell carcinoma can be distinguished from non-clear cell carcinoma by EADC value. There was significant difference in overall EADC values between renal cell carcinoma (0.150 ± 0.059) and angiomyolipoma (0.270 ± 0.108) when b value was 500 s/mm². When receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was higher than 0.192, the sensitivity and specificity of EADC value of renal cell carcinoma were 84.6 and 81.1 %, respectively. In conclusion, EADC map shows the internal structure of the kidney tumor more intuitively than the ADC map dose, and is also in line with the observation habits of the clinicians. EADC can be used as an effective imaging method for tumor diagnosis.

Clinical pharmacology, uses, and adverse reactions of iodinated contrast agents: a primer for the non-radiologist

Iodinated contrast agents have been in use since the 1950s to facilitate radiographic imaging modalities. Physicians in almost all specialties will either administer these agents or care for patients who have received these drugs. Different iodinated contrast agents vary greatly in their properties, uses, and toxic effects. Therefore, clinicians should be at least superficially familiar with the clinical pharmacology, administration, risks, and adverse effects associated with iodinated contrast agents. This primer offers the non-radiologist physician the opportunity to gain insight into the use of this class of drugs.