Pulmonary CT angiography in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism: case finding or screening procedure?

Limited Hospital Variation in the Use and Yield of CT for Pulmonary Embolism in Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement Surgery

Purpose To evaluate the variation among U.S. hospitals in overall use and yield of in-hospital computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography (PA) in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. Materials and Methods Patients in the Premier Research Database who underwent elective TKR or THR between 2007 and 2011 were enrolled in this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective observational study. The informed consent requirement was waived. Hospitals were categorized into low, medium, and high tertiles of CT PA use to compare baseline patient- and hospital-level characteristics and pulmonary embolism (PE) positivity rates. To further investigate between-hospital variation in CT PA use, a hierarchical logistic regression model that included hospital-specific random effects and fixed patient- and hospital-level effects was used. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the amount of variability in CT PA use attributable to between-hospital variation. Results The cohort included 205 198 patients discharged from 178 hospitals (median of 734.5 patients discharged per hospital; interquartile range, 316-1461 patients) with 3647 CT PA studies (1.8%). The crude frequency of CT PA scans among the hospitals ranged from 0% to 6.2% (median, 1.6%); more than 90% of the hospitals performed CT PA in less than 3% of their patients. The mean hospital-level PE positivity rate was 12.3% (median, 9.1%); there was no significant difference in PE positivity rate across low through high CT PA use tertiles (11.3%, 11.9%, 12.9%, P = .37). After adjustment for hospital- and patient-level factors, the remaining amount of interhospital variation was relatively low (ICC, 9.0%). Conclusion Limited interhospital variation in use and yield of in-hospital CT PA was observed among patients undergoing TKR or THR in the United States. ^© RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism: a multidisciplinary approach

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently considered in patients presenting to the emergency department or when hospitalized. Although early treatment is highly effective, PE is underdiagnosed and, therefore, the disease remains a major health problem. Since symptoms and signs are non specific and the consequences of anticoagulant treatment are considerable, objective tests to either establish or refute the diagnosis have become a standard of care. Diagnostic strategy should be based on clinical evaluation of the probability of PE. The accuracy of diagnostic tests for PE are high when the results are concordant with the clinical assessment. Additional testing is necessary when the test results are inconsistent with clinical probability. The present review article represents the consensus-based recommendations of the Interdisciplinary Association for Research in Lung Disease (AIMAR) multidisciplinary Task Force for diagnosis and treatment of PE. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians a practical diagnostic and therapeutic management approach using evidence from the literature.

Differential diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in outpatients with non-specific cardiopulmonary symptoms

Most cardiopulmonary diseases share at least one symptom with pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim of this study was to identify the most common acute causes of dyspnea, chest pain, fainting or palpitations, which diagnostic procedures were performed and whether clinicians investigate them appropriately. An Italian multicenter collaboration gathered 17,497 Emergency Department (ED) records of patients admitted from January 2007 to June 2007 in six hospitals. A block random sampling procedure was applied to select 800 hospitalised patients. Results of the overall 17,497 patients were obtained by weighting sampled cases according to the probability of the randomisation block variables in the whole population. The case-mix of enrolled patients was assessed in terms of cardiopulmonary symptoms, and the prevalence of acute disorders. The actual performance of procedures was compared with a measure of their accuracy as expected in the most common clinical presentations. PE occurred in less than 4% of patients with cardiopulmonary symptoms. Acute heart failure, pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation were the most likely diagnoses in patients with dyspnea. Acute myocardial infarction was present in roughly 10% of patients with chest pain. Atrial fibrillation was the prevalent diagnosis in patients with palpitations. Echocardiography, computed tomographic pulmonary angiography, perfusion lung scan, D-dimer test and B-type natriuretic peptide were performed less than expected from their accuracy. Diagnostic strategies, starting from non-specific symptoms and coping with the eventuality of PE, are likely to benefit from an increased awareness of the examination's accuracy in discriminating among several competing hypotheses, rather than in testing the single PE suspicion.

Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has simplified the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, PE diagnosis is still probabilistic and CTPA should be used with caution in some patient groups, such as patients with severe renal insufficiency and pregnant women. Among alternative imaging tests, lung ultrasound is the most promising technique. We aimed to systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for PE diagnosis.

METHODS

Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of PE were systematically searched for in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (up to June 2012). The QUADAS-2 tool was used for the quality assessment of the primary studies. A bivariate random-effects regression approach was used for summary estimates of both sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Ten studies, for a total of 887 patients, were included. A composite reference test was used in six studies, with single-row detector CTPA as the principal imaging test in four studies. Overall, seven studies used a proper reference test. Lung ultrasound bivariate weighted mean sensitivity was 87.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.5, 92.0%), whereas bivariate weighted mean specificity was 81.8% (95% CI 71.0, 89.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that lung ultrasound may be a useful diagnostic tool in the management of patients with suspected PE. However, several methodological drawbacks of the primary studies limit any definite conclusion. Further well-designed accuracy studies are necessary before planning diagnostic management studies, in particular in those with a contraindication for CTPA.

Finding an alternative diagnosis does not justify increased use of CT-pulmonary angiography

Background

The increased use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is often justified by finding alternative diagnoses explaining patients’ symptoms. However, this has not been rigorously examined.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed CTPA done at our center over an eleven year period (2000 – 2010) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus (PE). We then reviewed in detail the medical records of a representative sample of patients in three index years – 2000, 2005 and 2008. We determined whether CTPA revealed pulmonary pathology other than PE that was not readily identifiable from the patient’s history, physical examination and prior chest X-ray. We also assessed whether the use of pre-test probability guided diagnostic strategy for PE.

Results

A total of 12,640 CTPA were performed at our center from year 2000 to 2010. The number of CTPA performed increased from 84 in 2000 to 2287 in 2010, a 27 fold increase. Only 7.6 percent of all CTPA and 3.2 percent of avoidable CTPAs (low or intermediate pre-test probability and negative D-dimer) revealed previously unknown findings of any clinical significance. When we compared 2008 to 2000 and 2005, more CTPAs were performed in younger patients (mean age (years) for 2000: 67, 2005: 63, and 2008: 60, (p=0.004, one–way ANOVA)). Patients were less acutely ill with fewer risk factors for PE. Assessment of pre-test probability of PE and D-dimer measurement were rarely used to select appropriate patients for CTPA (pre-test probability of PE documented in chart (% total) in year 2000: 4.1%, 2005: 1.6%, 2008: 3.1%).

Conclusions

Our data do not support the argument that increased CTPA use is justified by finding an alternative pulmonary pathology that could explain patients’ symptoms. CTPA is being increasingly used as the first and only test for suspected PE.

Interobserver reliability of the chest radiograph in pulmonary embolism

This study was sought to evaluate the interobserver agreement for interpreting the chest radiograph of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The chest radiographs of 300 patients with clinically suspected acute PE were reviewed by 4 radiologists. Observers assessed the chest radiographic abnormalities and classified the chest radiograph as normal or abnormal. We found that the overall interobserver agreement was good for the exclusion of any pleural or parenchymal abnormality (k = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.56-0.64) but fair (k = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.17-0.40) between junior radiologists when evaluating supine chest radiographs. The level of interobserver agreement for the interpretation of the chest radiograph as consistent or not with PE was fair (k = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.19-0.29), regardless of the observer experience. In conclusion, chest radiography may be reliably used for targeting patients with suspected acute PE for different subsequent diagnostic investigations.

Pulmonary embolism: are we there yet?

INTRODUCTION

Clinical prediction rules (such as Wells model) are a reliable assessment tool for diagnostic work-up of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). When used as part of a clinical algorithm and in combination with a D-Dimer, the model can safely exclude PE in low-risk groups and indicate when further investigations are unnecessary. The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of adherence to local diagnostic imaging guidelines for suspected PE and to ascertain the impact of interventions.

METHODS

Retrospective search of all patients referred from the Emergency Department (ED) of Royal Perth Hospital for computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or V/Q scan between 11 September 2005 to 10 March 2006 (pre-intervention) and 1 January 2008 to 31 March 2008 (post-intervention) was conducted. The guidelines on 'Diagnostic Imaging Pathways' were considered as gold standard. Interventions included orienting ED doctors to guidelines and modified request forms for mandatory completion of Wells score. A prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) score analysed the level of agreement between documentation on notes (R-score) and stamp (S-score).

RESULTS

Thirty-five per cent (n = 187) and 22% (n = 109) deviated from the pathway pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (13% absolute reduction; P = 0.017). Stamp compliance was only 55% despite mandatory filling requirement. PABAK for 'PE as most likely diagnosis' was 0.25 for V/Q group and - 0.26 for CTPA. In addition, 44/60 (73%) had an intermediate or high S-score, yet only 11 of those 44 had a matched intermediate to high R-Score.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions reduced inappropriate practice but did not eliminate it completely. Compliance issues may be managed in the future via the introduction of electronic request linked to decision support.

Clinical presentation of acute pulmonary embolism: survey of 800 cases

Background

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and potentially fatal disease that is still underdiagnosed. The objective of our study was to reappraise the clinical presentation of PE with emphasis on the identification of the symptoms and signs that prompt the patients to seek medical attention.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We studied 800 patients with PE from two different clinical settings: 440 were recruited in Pisa (Italy) as part of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISAPED); 360 were diagnosed with and treated for PE in seven hospitals of central Tuscany, and evaluated at the Atherothrombotic Disorders Unit, Firenze (Italy), shortly after hospital discharge. We interviewed the patients directly using a standardized, self-administered questionnaire originally utilized in the PISAPED. The two samples differed significantly as regards age, proportion of outpatients, prevalence of unprovoked PE, and of active cancer. Sudden onset dyspnea was the most frequent symptom in both samples (81 and 78%), followed by chest pain (56 and 39%), fainting or syncope (26 and 22%), and hemoptysis (7 and 5%). At least one of the above symptoms was reported by 756 (94%) of 800 patients. Isolated symptoms and signs of deep vein thrombosis occurred in 3% of the cases. Only 7 (1%) of 800 patients had no symptoms before PE was diagnosed.

Conclusions/Significance

Most patients with PE feature at least one of four symptoms which, in decreasing order of frequency, are sudden onset dyspnea, chest pain, fainting (or syncope), and hemoptysis. The occurrence of such symptoms, if not explained otherwise, should alert the clinicians to consider PE in differential diagnosis, and order the appropriate objective test.

Evolution of CT pulmonary angiography: referral patterns and diagnostic yield in 2009 compared with 2006

BACKGROUND

CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is an increasingly popular imaging test for assessing patients with acute chest pain.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the number of CTPA performed in 2009 compared with 2006 and assess the frequency of pulmonary embolus (PE) versus alternative diagnoses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Numbers of CTPA and V/Q scans performed in a six-month period of 2006 and 2009 were established by review of the hospital radiology information system. CTPAs were evaluated by two radiologists in consensus and the incidence of pulmonary embolism and alternative diagnoses in 2006 and 2009 were recorded.

RESULTS

The final study groups were 99 patients who underwent CTPA in 2006 and 149 patients in 2009. There was a significant fall in the incidence of PE identified on CTPA in 2009 compared to 2006 (11% versus 21%, P = 0.04). There was a non-significant rise in the incidence of alternative diagnoses in 2009 compared to 2006 (45% versus 40%, P = 0.48). Nine types of alternative radiological diagnoses were made on CTPA, the most common of which was pneumonia in both time periods (17% and 12%). Eighty-seven V/Q scans were performed in the study period in 2006, compared to 109 in 2009. The incidence of PE identified on V/Q scanning remained stable (8% in 2009 versus 12% in 2006, P = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

The numbers of CTPAs being performed has increased in three years. The incidence of PE identified has fallen and there has been a modest increase in the number of alternative diagnoses.

Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of evidence-based clinical decision support (CDS) on the use and yield of computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study, which was performed between October 1, 2003, and September 30, 2009, at a 793-bed quaternary care institution with 60,000 annual ED visits. Use (number of examinations per 1000 ED visits) and yield (percentage of examinations positive for acute PE) of CT pulmonary angiography were compared before and after CDS implementation in August 2007. The authors included all adult patients presenting to the ED and developed and validated a natural language processing tool to identify acute PE diagnoses. Linear trend analysis was used to assess for variation in CT pulmonary angiography use. Logistic regression was used to determine variation in yield after controlling for patient demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 338,230 patients presenting to the ED, 6838 (2.0%) underwent CT pulmonary angiography. Quarterly CT pulmonary angiography use increased 82.1% before CDS implementation, from 14.5 to 26.4 examinations per 1000 patients (P<.0001) between October 10, 2003, and July 31, 2007. After CDS implementation, quarterly use decreased 20.1%, from 26.4 to 21.1 examinations per 1000 patients between August 1, 2007, and September 30, 2009 (P=.0379). Overall, 686 (10.0%) of the CT pulmonary angiographic examinations performed during the 6-year period were positive for PE; subsequent to CDS implementation, yield by quarter increased 69.0%, from 5.8% to 9.8% (P=.0323).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of evidence-based CDS in the ED was associated with a significant decrease in use, and increase in yield, of CT pulmonary angiography for the evaluation of acute PE.

Evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency department: "triple rule-out" computed tomography angiography

Triage of patients with acute, potentially life-threatening chest pain is one of the most important issues currently facing physicians in the emergency department. Appropriate evaluation of these patients begins with a skilled assessment of the individual patient's presenting symptoms and a careful review of his or her history and physical examination, often followed by serial recording of electrocardiograms and measurement of serum biochemical markers such as troponin and d-dimer. Stress testing, often accompanied by rest and stress myocardial perfusion imaging or echocardiography, and other diagnostic testing such as radionuclide lung scanning and invasive angiography may be required. A rapid, accurate, and cost-effective approach for the evaluation of emergency department patients with chest pain is needed. Development of newer generations of multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) scanners, which are capable not only of performing high-quality noninvasive coronary angiography, but also concurrent aortic and pulmonary angiography, has led to increased use of MDCT for the so-called "triple rule out." MDCT is used for the detection of 3 of the most common life-threatening causes of chest pain-coronary artery disease, acute aortic syndrome, and pulmonary emboli. While triple rule-out protocol can be very useful and potentially cost effective when used appropriately, concern has risen regarding the overuse of this technology, which could expose patients to unnecessary radiation and iodinated contrast. The triple rule-out protocol is most appropriate for patients who present with acute chest pain, but are judged to have low to intermediate increased risk for acute coronary syndrome, and whose chest pain symptoms might also be attributed to acute pathologic conditions of the aorta or pulmonary arteries. MDCT should not be used as a routine screening procedure. Continued technical improvements in acquisition speed and spatial resolution of computed tomography images, and development of more efficient image reconstruction algorithms which reduce patient exposure to radiation and contrast, may result in increased popularity of MDCT for "triple rule-out."

Update on techniques for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The clinical suspicion of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently raised. However, the diagnosis of PE is confirmed in only 20 - 30% of these patients. The high incidence in addition to the potential harm from false-positive or false-negative diagnostic decisions underline the importance of a standardised diagnostic algorithm with high sensitivity as well as specificity.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This article reviews the diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of PE.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review provides an overview of the different clinical decision rules (CDRs), D-dimer tests and imaging techniques in patients suspected of PE. Furthermore, the diagnostic process in patients with clinically suspected recurrent PE, suspicion during pregnancy and new research areas are discussed.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Various diagnostic tests are available to detect or exclude PE with good accuracy. CDRs and D-dimer tests play an important role in the exclusion of PE. Neither is sufficient as a single test, but the combination of an 'unlikely' clinical prediction and a normal D-dimer test result safely excludes PE. In case of a high CDR score and/or an elevated D-dimer concentration, extra imaging is necessary with multi-slice computed tomography pulmonary angiography as first choice modality.