Autoimmune pancreatitis: pancreatic and extrapancreatic MR imaging-MR cholangiopancreatography findings at diagnosis, after steroid therapy, and at recurrence

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Biopsy interpretation and differential diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified into type 1 (IgG4-related) and type 2 (IgG4-unrelated) and the interpretation of pancreatic biopsy findings plays a crucial role in their diagnosis. Needle biopsy of type 1 AIP in the acute or subacute phase shows a diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, and the infiltration of many IgG4-positive plasma cells. In a later phase, changes become less inflammatory and more fibrotic, making interpretations more challenging. Confirmation of the lack of 'negative' findings that are unlikely to occur in type 1 AIP (e.g., neutrophilic infiltration, abscess) is important to avoid an overdiagnosis. The number of IgG4-positive plasma cells increases to >10 cells/high-power field (hpf), and the IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cell ratio exceeds 40 %. However, these are minimal criteria and typical cases show >30 positive cells/hpf and a ratio >70 % even in biopsy specimens. Therefore, cases with a borderline increase in this number or ratio need to be diagnosed with caution. In cases of ductal adenocarcinoma, the upstream pancreas rarely shows type 1 AIP-like changes; however, the ratio of IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cells is typically <40 %. Although the identification of a granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) is crucial for type 2 AIP, this finding needs to be interpreted in conjunction with a background dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. An isolated neutrophilic duct injury can occur in peritumoral or obstructive pancreatitis. Drug-induced pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease often mimics type 2 AIP clinically and pathologically. IL-8 and PD-L1 are potential ancillary immunohistochemical markers for type 2 AIP, requiring validation studies.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: Cornerstones and future perspectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an autoimmune subtype of chronic pancreatitis resulting from the aberrant immune response against the pancreas, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. Although AIP is rare, its incidence is increasing and is often misdiagnosed as other pancreatic diseases. AIP is commonly classified into two types. Type 1 AIP (AIP-1) is typically associated with elevated serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels and systemic manifestations, while type 2 AIP is typically a more localized form of the disease, and may coexist with other autoimmune disorders, especially inflammatory bowel diseases. Additionally, there is emerging recognition of a third type (type 3 AIP), which refers to immunotherapy-triggered AIP, although this classification is still gaining acceptance in medical literature. The clinical manifestations of AIP mainly include painless jaundice and weight loss. Elevated serum IgG4 levels are particularly characteristic of AIP-1. Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histological findings, given the similarity of AIP symptoms to other pancreatic disorders. The mainstay of treatment for AIP is steroid therapy, which is effective in most cases. Severe cases might require additional imm-unosuppressive agents. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of AIP, encompassing its epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options. We also address the challenges and controversies in diagnosing and treating AIP, such as distinguishing it from pancreatic cancer and managing long-term treatment, highlighting the need for increased awareness and knowledge of this complex disease.

[Autoimmune pancreatitis versus pancreatic cancer]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified as a distinct form of pancreatitis according to the guidelines. It is characterized by imaging morphologic and histologic features and is associated with extrapancreatic manifestations in type 1 IgG 4-associated disease. Symptoms and findings almost always improve with administration of steroids. Differentiation from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is required, particularly in the presence of AIP with focal parenchymal involvement.

STANDARD RADIOLOGIC PROCEDURES

If AIP is suspected, abdominal ultrasound and/or endosonography, computed tomography (CT), and preferably magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are indicated. A distinction is made between parenchymal and ductal changes that specifically indicate the presence of AIP.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND EVALUATION

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis should be made based on the International Consensus Criteria (ICDC), in which the five main features (imaging, serology, histology, other organ involvement, response to steroid medication) are assessed. In type 1 AIP, typical imaging changes are sufficient to establish the diagnosis even with negative histology, whereas for type 2 AIP, histologic evidence is required. Imaging changes help in the differential diagnosis from pancreatic cancer.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The following article addresses and evaluates crucial imaging diagnostic CT and MRI criteria for correct classification of findings, description of results, and differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.

Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma using CT characteristics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine informational CT findings for distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to review their diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

A systematic and detailed literature review was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. Similar descriptors to embody the identical image finding were labeled as a single CT characteristic. We calculated the pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of each CT characteristic using a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 145 various descriptors from 15 studies (including 562 AIP and 869 PDAC patients) were categorized into 16 CT characteristics. According to the pooled DOR, 16 CT characteristics were classified into three groups (suggesting AIP, suggesting PDAC, and not informational). Seven characteristics suggesting AIP were diffuse pancreatic enlargement (DOR, 48), delayed homogeneous enhancement (DOR, 46), capsule-like rim (DOR, 34), multiple pancreatic masses (DOR, 16), renal involvement (DOR, 15), retroperitoneal fibrosis (DOR, 13), and bile duct involvement (DOR, 8). Delayed homogeneous enhancement showed a pooled sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 85%. The other six characteristics showed relatively low sensitivity (12-63%) but high specificity (93-99%). Four characteristics suggesting PDAC were discrete pancreatic mass (DOR, 23), pancreatic duct cutoff (DOR, 16), upstream main pancreatic duct dilatation (DOR, 8), and upstream parenchymal atrophy (DOR, 7).

CONCLUSION

Eleven CT characteristics were informational to distinguish AIP from PDAC. Diffuse pancreatic enlargement, delayed homogeneous enhancement, and capsule-like rim suggested AIP with the highest DORs, whereas discrete pancreatic mass suggested PDAC. However, pooled sensitivities of informational CT characteristics were moderate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This meta-analysis underscores eleven distinctive CT characteristics that aid in differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma, potentially preventing misdiagnoses in patients presenting with focal/diffuse pancreatic enlargement.

KEY POINTS

• Diffuse pancreatic enlargement (pooled diagnostic odds ratio [DOR], 48), delayed homogeneous enhancement (46), and capsule-like rim (34) were CT characteristics suggesting autoimmune pancreatitis. • The CT characteristics suggesting autoimmune pancreatitis, except delayed homogeneous enhancement, had a general tendency to show relatively low sensitivity (12-63%) but high specificity (93-99%). • Discrete pancreatic mass (pooled diagnostic odds ratio, 23) was the CT characteristic suggesting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with the highest pooled DORs.

Pancreatic Cancer and Its Mimics

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common primary pancreatic malignancy, ranking fourth in cancer-related mortality in the United States. Typically, PDAC appears on images as a hypovascular mass with upstream pancreatic duct dilatation and abrupt duct cutoff, distal pancreatic atrophy, and vascular encasement, with metastatic involvement including lymphadenopathy. However, atypical manifestations that may limit detection of the underlying PDAC may also occur. Atypical PDAC features include findings related to associated conditions such as acute or chronic pancreatitis, a mass that is isointense to the parenchyma, multiplicity, diffuse tumor infiltration, associated calcifications, and cystic components. Several neoplastic and inflammatory conditions can mimic PDAC, such as paraduodenal "groove" pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, focal acute and chronic pancreatitis, neuroendocrine tumors, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, metastases, and lymphoma. Differentiation of these conditions from PDAC can be challenging due to overlapping CT and MRI features; however, certain findings can help in differentiation. Diffusion-weighted MRI can be helpful but also can be nonspecific. Accurate diagnosis is pivotal for guiding therapeutic planning and potential outcomes in PDAC and avoiding biopsy or surgical treatment of some of these mimics. Biopsy may still be required for diagnosis in some cases. The authors describe the typical and atypical imaging findings of PDAC and features that may help to differentiate PDAC from its mimics. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Zins in this issue.

Approach to Pancreatic Head Mass in the Background of Chronic Pancreatitis

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. CP may present with an inflammatory mass, and differentiation from pancreatic cancer is often difficult. Clinical suspicion of malignancy dictates a need for further evaluation for underlying pancreatic cancer. Imaging modalities remain the mainstay of evaluation for a mass in background CP; however, they have their shortcomings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become the go-to investigation. Adjunct modalities such as contrast-harmonic EUS and EUS elastography, as well as EUS-guided sampling using newer-generation needles are useful in differentiating inflammatory from malignant masses in the pancreas. Paraduodenal pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis often masquerade as pancreatic cancer. In this narrative review, we discuss the various modalities used to differentiate inflammatory from malignant masses of the pancreas.

Patterns of Relapse and Complications of Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a multisystemic fibroinflammatory condition potentially resulting in organ dysfunction. We aimed to evaluate imaging characteristics of disease relapse and complications in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of IgG4-RD patients imaged between 2010 and 2020. Radiological manifestations of disease activity (remission/stability vs. relapse and complications) were correlated with clinical symptoms. Univariate analyses were performed with χ2, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Times to relapse and organ atrophy were studied with Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients had imaging surveillance over a median duration of 47 months. Radiological relapse occurred in 50.7% (35/69) with median time to relapse at 74 months (95% confidence interval, 45-122 months); 42.8% (15/35) of this cohort had different-site relapse with the following recognized primary-secondary patterns: pancreas-hepatobiliary (p = 0.005), hepatobiliary-pancreas (p = 0.013), and periaortitis-mesenteric (p = 0.006). Clinical symptoms were significantly associated with imaging characteristics (p < 0.001). Abdominal complications were detected in 52.2% (36/69) of patients, mostly solid organ atrophy (97.2% [35/36]). New-onset diabetes was more likely in pancreatic IgG4-RD (n = 51) when accompanied by gland atrophy (4/21 vs. 0/30 nonatrophy, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Radiological relapse of IgG4-RD is common over prolonged imaging surveillance and is significantly associated with symptomatic relapse. A multisystem review to detect new/different sites of disease and abdominal complications may help predict future organ dysfunction.

IgG4-related autoimmune liver disease

The term IgG4-related autoimmune liver disease (AILD) refers to hepato-biliary manifestations of Immunoglobin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) including IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-related pseudotumor. The association of some forms of autoimmune hepatitis to IgG4-RD remains controversial. Although autoimmune phenomena have not been clearly observed in IgG4-AILD, perturbation of the adaptive immune system and activation of the humoral response represent established pathophysiological hallmarks and potential therapeutic targets. Clinical manifestations of IgG4-AILD are virtually indistinguishable from bile duct cancer or primary sclerosing cholangitis and are due to mass forming lesions and thickening of the biliary tract that progressively lead to biliary ducts obstruction. There are no current reliable biomarkers for IgG4-AILD and diagnosis should rely on the integration of clinical, serological, radiological, and histological findings. In analogy to most IgG4-RD manifestations, and in contrast to its major mimickers, IgG4-AILD promptly responds to glucocorticoids but frequently relapses, thus requiring long-term maintenance therapy to avoid progressive fibrosclerotic disease and liver cirrhosis. Accumulating evidence on the efficacy of B-cell depletion therapy in patients with systemic IgG4-RD is gradually changing the treatment paradigm of IgG4-AILD and biologics will be increasingly used also for gastroenterological manifestations of IgG4-RD to spare glucocorticoids and traditional immunosuppressive agents. Looking ahead, identification of reliable biomarkers and of mini-invasive strategies to obtain informative biopsies from the biliary tree represent unavoidable priorities to optimize diagnosis and management of IgG4-AILD.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI features for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To identify reliable MRI features for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and to summarize their diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify original articles published between January 2006 and July 2021. The pooled diagnostic accuracy, including the diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the identified features, was calculated using a bivariate random effects model.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, and 92 overlapping descriptors were subsumed under 16 MRI features. Ten features favoring AIP were diffuse enlargement (DOR, 75; 95% CI, 9-594), capsule-like rim (DOR, 52; 95% CI, 20-131), multiple main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures (DOR, 47; 95% CI, 17-129), homogeneous delayed enhancement (DOR, 46; 95% CI, 21-104), low apparent diffusion coefficient value (DOR, 30), speckled enhancement (DOR, 30), multiple pancreatic masses (DOR, 29), tapered narrowing of MPD (DOR, 15), penetrating duct sign (DOR, 14), and delayed enhancement (DOR, 13). Six features favoring PDAC were target type enhancement (DOR, 41; 95% CI, 11-158), discrete pancreatic mass (DOR, 35; 95% CI, 15-80), upstream MPD dilatation (DOR, 13), peripancreatic fat infiltration (DOR, 10), upstream parenchymal atrophy (DOR, 5), and vascular involvement (DOR, 3).

CONCLUSION

This study identified 16 informative MRI features to differentiate AIP from PDAC. Among them, diffuse enlargement, capsule-like rim, multiple MPD strictures, and homogeneous delayed enhancement favored AIP with the highest DORs, whereas discrete mass and target type enhancement favored PDAC.

KEY POINTS

• The MRI features with the highest pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) for autoimmune pancreatitis were diffuse enlargement of the pancreas (75), capsule-like rim (52), multiple strictures of the main pancreatic duct (47), and homogeneous delayed enhancement (46). • The MRI features with the highest pooled DORs for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were target type enhancement (41) and discrete pancreatic mass (35).

MRI features for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The accurate differential diagnosis between autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is clinically important. We aimed to determine significant MRI features for differentiating AIP from PDAC, including assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

METHODS

We performed a systematic search using three databases. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was calculated using a bivariate random effects model to determine significant MRI features for differentiating AIP from PDAC. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. The qualitative systematic review for DWI assessment was performed.

RESULTS

Of nine studies (775 patients), multiple main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures, absence of upstream marked MPD dilatation, peripancreatic rim, and duct penetration sign were significant MRI features for differentiating AIP from PDAC. Absence of MPD dilatation had the highest pooled sensitivity (87%, 95% CI=68-96%), whereas peripancreatic rim had the highest pooled specificity (100%, 95% CI=88-100%). Of 12 studies evaluating DWI, seven reported statistically significant differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between AIP and PDAC; however, four reported lower ADC values in AIP than in PDAC, but three reported the opposite result.

CONCLUSION

The four significant MRI features can be useful to differentiate AIP from PDAC, but DWI assessment might be limited.

CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Focal-Type Autoimmune Pancreatitis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the radiomics score (rad-score) for differentiating focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (fAIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective review included 42 consecutive patients with fAIP diagnosed according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria between January 2011 and December 2018. Furthermore, 334 consecutive patients with PDAC confirmed by pathology were also reviewed during the same period. Patients with PDAC and fAIP were matched via propensity score matching (PSM). All patients underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). For each patient, 1409 radiomics features of the portal phase were extracted and reduced using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm. The portal rad-score performance was assessed based on its discriminative ability.

RESULTS

After PSM, we matched 55 patients with PDAC to 42 patients with fAIP, based on clinical and CT characteristics (e.g., patient age, sex, body mass index, location, size, enhanced mode). A rad-score for discriminating fAIP from PDAC, which contained four CT derived radiomic features, was developed (area under the curve = 0.97). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the radiomics model were 95.24%, 92.73% and 0.94, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The portal rad-score can accurately and noninvasively differentiate fAIP from PDAC.

Application of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in preoperative differential diagnosis of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 2016 to March 2020, patients with biopsy and histopathologically confirmed focal-type AIP (n = 9) were retrospectively included. All patients received contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations one week before surgery/biopsy. Dynamic analysis was performed by VueBox® software (Bracco, Italy). Eighteen cases of resection and histopathologically proved PDAC lesions were also included as control group. B mode ultrasound (BMUS) features, CEUS enhancement patterns, time intensity curves (TICs) and CEUS quantitative parameters were obtained and compared between AIP and PDAC lesions.

RESULTS

After injection of ultrasound contrast agents, most focal-type AIP lesions displayed hyper-enhancement (2/9, 22.2%) or iso-enhancement (6/9, 66.7%) during arterial phase of CEUS, while most of PDAC lesions showed hypo-enhancement (88.9%) (P < 0.01). During late phase, most of AIP lesions showed iso-enhancement (8/9, 88.9%), while most of PDAC lesions showed hypo-enhancement (94.4%) (P < 0.001). Compared with PDAC lesions, TICs of AIP lesions showed delayed and higher enhancement. Among all CEUS perfusion parameters, ratio of PE (peak enhancement), WiAUC (wash-in area under the curve), WiR (wash-in rate), WiPI (wash-in perfusion index, WiPI = WiAUC/ rise time), WoAUC (wash-out area under the curve), WiWoAUC (wash-in and wash-out area under the curve) and WoR (wash-out rate) between pancreatic lesion and surrounding normal pancreatic tissue were significantly higher in AIP lesions than PDAC lesions (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DCE-US with quantitative analysis has the potential to make preoperative differential diagnosis between focal-type AIP and PDAC non-invasively.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: What we know so far

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare, often‐missed disease that involves inflammation of the pancreas and strictures of the pancreatic duct. Its prevalence and incidence in the United States remain scarce. The disease has a varied presentation and often mimics pancreatic malignancy, which can make the diagnosis challenging. Most patients have an excellent response to corticosteroid therapy. Immunomodulators may be used in some cases. Rituximab is an effective, emerging treatment in steroid‐refractory cases. This study aims to review the two distinct types of AIP and provide a detailed analysis of the diagnostic approach and treatment modalities.

Use of MRI signal intensity ratio to differentiate between autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of the lesion-to-erector spinae signal intensity ratio (SIR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRI data of 21 patients with AIP and 27 patients with PDA were analysed retrospectively, and the signal intensity in pancreatic lesions and erector spinae muscles at the same level on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), arterial phase (AP) imaging, and delayed phase (DP) imaging was measured for calculation of SIRs.

RESULTS

The mean SIRs of the pancreatic lesions and erector spinae from T2WI, AP, and DP images of AIP patients were 0.96, 1.27, and 1.42, respectively, while those of PDA patients were 1.35, 0.80, and 0.91, respectively. The differences in the SIRs between the AIP and PDA groups were statistically significant (p<0.001), with corresponding area under curve (AUC) values of 0.925, 0.906, and 0.961, respectively. The optimal cut-off values for the SIRs on T2WI, AP and DP images were 1.21, 1.01, and 1.08, respectively. SIR values < 1.21 on T2WI, >1.01 on AP imaging, and >1.08 on DP imaging identified AIP with sensitivities of 85.7%, 90.5%, and 90.5%, respectively, and specificities of 81.5%, 74.6%, and 81.5%, respectively. The AUC values for SIRs did not differ significantly between T2WI and DP imaging or AP and DP imaging (Z = 0.778, p=0.436; Z = 1.279, p=0.201).

CONCLUSION

The SIRs of pancreatic lesions and erector spinae on T2WI, AP, and DP images can be used to differentiate AIP from PDA.

Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Consensus and Controversies

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has attracted much attention in the last two decades, and due to the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), the number of cases diagnosed in clinical practice has markedly increased. However, in contrast to prototypic IgG4-related type 1 AIP, a minor subtype of AIP, referred to as type 2 AIP, is less widely known and has thus not yet been characterized in detail. Type 2 AIP is unrelated to IgG4 and is a completely distinct entity from type 1 AIP. One confusing factor is that the two types of AIP share patterns of clinical presentation (e.g., acute pancreatitis and painless jaundice) and imaging abnormalities (e.g., diffuse or segmental enlargement). Since there are currently no established serum markers, the diagnosis of type 2 AIP is highly challenging and requires the tissue confirmation of neutrophilic injury to the pancreatic ducts, a finding designated as a granulocytic epithelial lesion. Approximately one-third of cases are associated with inflammatory bowel disease, particularly ulcerative colitis; however, the pathological relationship between these two conditions has not yet been clarified. Unanswered questions relate to its pathophysiology, the potential development of a similar granulocytic injury in other organs, and the characteristics of pediatric cases. This review summarizes consensus and controversies surrounding type 2 AIP, with the aim of increasing awareness and highlighting the unmet needs of this underrecognized condition.

Multimodel magnetic resonance imaging of mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis: differential diagnosis with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the value of the multimodel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including unenhanced images, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), MR-cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in differentiation of mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Twelve patients with mass-forming AIP and 30 with PDAC were included. All patients underwent unenhanced MRI, DCE-MRI, DWI, and MRCP. Relevant values including sensitivity and specificity of the imaging features and their diagnostic performance for predicting mass-forming AIP were analyzed.

RESULTS

Several statistically significant MR findings and quantitative indexes differentiating mass-forming AIP from PDAC, including multiplicity, irregularity or conformation, capsule-like rim enhancement, absence of internal cystic or necrotic portion, homogeneous enhancement during pancreatic, venous, and delayed phases, skipped stricture or stricture of MPD, absence of side branch dilation, maximum upstream MPD diameter < 2.4 mm, ContrastUP > 0.739, ContrastAP > 0.710, ContrastPP > 0.879, and ContrastVP or ContrastDP > 0.949, indicated mass-forming AIP (P < 0.05). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was also significantly lower in mass-forming AIP compared to that in PDAC (P = 0.006). The cutoff value of ADC for distinguishing mass-forming AIP from PDAC was 1.099 × 10-3 mm2/s.

CONCLUSION

Multimodel MRI, including unenhanced MRI, DCE-MRI with DWI and MRCP can provide qualitative and quantitative information about mass-forming AIP characterization. Multimodel MRI are valuable for differentiating mass-forming AIP from PDAC.

Utilisation of artificial intelligence for the development of an EUS-convolutional neural network model trained to enhance the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is challenging. Sonographic and cross-sectional imaging findings of AIP closely mimic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and techniques for tissue sampling of AIP are suboptimal. These limitations often result in delayed or failed diagnosis, which negatively impact patient management and outcomes. This study aimed to create an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-based convolutional neural network (CNN) model trained to differentiate AIP from PDAC, chronic pancreatitis (CP) and normal pancreas (NP), with sufficient performance to analyse EUS video in real time.

DESIGN

A database of still image and video data obtained from EUS examinations of cases of AIP, PDAC, CP and NP was used to develop a CNN. Occlusion heatmap analysis was used to identify sonographic features the CNN valued when differentiating AIP from PDAC.

RESULTS

From 583 patients (146 AIP, 292 PDAC, 72 CP and 73 NP), a total of 1 174 461 unique EUS images were extracted. For video data, the CNN processed 955 EUS frames per second and was: 99% sensitive, 98% specific for distinguishing AIP from NP; 94% sensitive, 71% specific for distinguishing AIP from CP; 90% sensitive, 93% specific for distinguishing AIP from PDAC; and 90% sensitive, 85% specific for distinguishing AIP from all studied conditions (ie, PDAC, CP and NP).

CONCLUSION

The developed EUS-CNN model accurately differentiated AIP from PDAC and benign pancreatic conditions, thereby offering the capability of earlier and more accurate diagnosis. Use of this model offers the potential for more timely and appropriate patient care and improved outcome.

Immunotherapy-Related Imaging Findings in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies: What Radiologists Need to Know

Immunotherapy is an effective treatment option for gynecological malignancies. Radiologists dealing with gynecological patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors should be aware of unconventional immune-related imaging features for the evaluation of tumor response and immune-related adverse events. In this paper, immune checkpoint inhibitors used for gynecological malignancies and their mechanisms of action are briefly presented. In the second part, patterns of pseudoprogression are illustrated, and different forms of immune-related adverse events are discussed.

DWI of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Is It an Imaging Biomarker for Disease Activity?

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the DWI features of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) at baseline, under treatment, and at relapse, and to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the ADC for determining disease activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Sixty-two patients with AIP (48 at initial attack and 14 at relapse) underwent MRI with DWI (b = 0 and 800 s/mm²) at 3 T before receiving corticosteroid therapy (CST) and during follow-up. Seventeen patients had disease relapse during follow-up, whereas the others remained clinically stable. Forty age- and sex-matched patients without pancreatic disease served as the control group. RESULTS. The ADC value of AIP at baseline was significantly lower than that for a disease-free pancreas (0.99 ± 0.12 vs 1.26 ± 0.10 × 10^-3 mm²/s, p < .001). Under CST, the ADC value increased gradually at the short-term and long-term follow-up (1.16 ± 0.12 and 1.23 ± 0.12 × 10^-3 mm²/s, respectively, both p < .001). At relapse, the ADC had a relative decrease (1.11 ± 0.20 × 10^-3 mm²/s) but was significantly higher compared with the initial attack (p = .003). The AUC of ADC serum IgG4 level at ROC analysis for baseline versus clinically stable AIP was 0.867 and 0.700, the AUC for clinically active AIP versus clinically stable AIP was 0.762 and 0.686, and the AUC for relapsed AIP versus clinically stable AIP was 0.648 and 0.669. CONCLUSION. DWI reflected the dynamic change of AIP under CST, and the ADC value for DWI outperformed the serum IgG4 value for determining disease activity. However, relapsed disease showed less diffusion restriction, and the ADC value was less accurate for predicting relapse.

Differentiation between non-hypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and mass-forming pancreatitis using contrast-enhanced computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Non-hypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) showed slight or iso-enhancement in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), which shared similar imaging findings with mass-forming pancreatitis (MFPs).

PURPOSE

To explore the value of CT imaging features in differentiating the two diseases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients with histologically proved MFPs (n = 27) or non-hypervascular PNETs (n = 24) were included. Two radiologists reviewed CT imaging findings and clinical features. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify relevant features in differentiating non-hypervascular PNETs and MFPs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to show the performance of the optimal parameters in differentiating non-hypervascular PNETs and MFPs.

RESULTS

A well-defined margin was more common in non-hypervascular PNETs (P < 0.05) than that in MFPs. MFPs often occurred in older people (P < 0.01) and the head-neck of the pancreas compared with non-hypervascular PNETs (P < 0.05). Metastases only presented in non-hypervascular PNETs (P < 0.05). CT values at venous phase and delay phase of MFPs were higher (P = 0.010 and P = 0.029) than those in non-hypervascular PNETs. Logistic analysis showed gender, tumor margin, CT values at venous phase, and tumor components were independent predictors in differentiating the two lesions. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.938 with a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 92.6% for combined predicators.

CONCLUSION

Gender, tumor margin, CT values at venous phase, and tumor components were useful predicators in differentiating non-hypervascular PNETs and MFPs.

Imaging diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a pancreatic phenotype of IgG4-related systemic disease. Since its first description in the literature, characteristic imaging features have gradually become known to many clinicians encompassing various specialties in the past quarter century. CT and MRI have been the workhorses for imaging diagnosis of AIP. Typical features include sausage-like swelling of the focal or entire pancreas, duct-penetrating sign, a capsule-like rim of the affected lesions, and homogeneous delayed enhancement or enhanced duct sign after contrast administration, as well as characteristic combined findings reflecting coexisting pathologies in the other organs as a systemic disease. In this review, recent and future developments in CT and MRI that may help diagnose AIP are discussed, including restricted diffusion and perfusion and increased elasticity measured using MR.

Meta-analysis of CT and MRI for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To systematically determine the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a comparison between the two imaging modalities.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted using PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify original articles published between 2009 and 2019 reporting the diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for differentiating AIP from PDAC. The meta-analytic sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI were calculated, and compared using a bivariate random effects model. Subgroup analysis for differentiating focal AIP from PDAC was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 856 articles screened, 11 eligible articles are remained, i.e., five studies for CT, four for MRI, and two for both. The meta-analytic summary sensitivity and specificity of CT were 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-75%) and 99% (95% CI, 88-100%), respectively, while those of MRI were 84% (95% CI, 68-93%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%). MRI had a significantly higher meta-analytic summary sensitivity than CT (84% vs. 59%, p = 0.02) but a similar specificity (97% vs. 99%, p = 0.18). In the subgroup analysis for focal AIP, the sensitivity for distinguishing between focal AIP and PDAC was lower than that for the overall analysis. MRI had a higher sensitivity than CT (76% vs. 50%, p = 0.28) but a similar specificity (97% vs. 98%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

MRI might be clinically more useful to evaluate patients with AIP, particularly for differentiating AIP from PDAC.

KEY POINTS

• MRI had an overall good diagnostic performance to differentiate AIP from PDAC with a meta-analytic summary estimate of 83% for sensitivity and of 97% for specificity. • CT had a very high specificity (99%), but a suboptimal sensitivity (59%) for differentiating AIP from PDAC. • Compared with CT, MRI had a higher sensitivity, but a similar specificity.

IgG4-related disease in the abdomen and pelvis: atypical findings, pitfalls, and mimics

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a systemic, autoimmune, fibroinflammatory disease that can cause multi-organ damage. Although there have been many trials and studies since its recognition in 2003, there is still much that is unknown. Furthermore, IgG4-RD can affect any organ in the body and often has many mimics and alternative diagnoses, which can make for a challenging workup. Imaging plays a substantial role in the diagnosis of IgG4-RD and is often the first occasion where IgG4-RD comes into consideration. Thus, knowledge about the imaging findings of various manifestations of IgG4-RD can aid in the diagnosis and have a significant impact on patient management. In this article, we review the wide array of imaging findings, both typical and atypical, as well as possible mimics of IgG4-RD in the abdomen and pelvis.

Differentiation of Focal-Type Autoimmune Pancreatitis From Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Radiomics Based on Multiphasic Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a radiomics model for a differential diagnosis of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients, 45 with AIP and 51 with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent pretreatment abdominal computed tomography imaging acquired at noncontrast, arterial, and venous phases. Furthermore, 1160 radiomics features were extracted from each phasic image to build radiomics models. The performance of radiomics model was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The results of radiomics model were also compared with those of radiologists' visual assessments.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the optimal radiomics model were 93.3%, 96.1%, and 94.8%, respectively. They were higher than those of the radiologists' assessments with sensitivity of 57.78% and 73.33%, specificity of 88.24% and 90.20%, and accuracy of 75.00% and 81.25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics is helpful for a differential diagnosis of AIP in clinical practice as a noninvasive and quantitative method.

European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations

The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4-related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work-up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra-pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4-related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6-0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30-40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2-4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi-organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.

Clinical and imaging features of IgG4-related kidney disease

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical and imaging features of IgG4-RKD for understanding and diagnosis of this disease.

METHODS

CT and MR images of 34 patients with IgG4-RKD were retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists in consensus.

RESULTS

The serum IgG4 level was found being increased in all patients. Renal involvement was bilateral (24/34, 70.6%) or unilateral (10/34,29.4%), multiple (29/34, 85.3%) or solitary (5/34, 14.7%). The lesions were wedge-shaped (21) or mass-like (4) in the renal parenchyma, whereas diffusely decreased renal density was noted in 2 patients. All lesions showed progressive contrast enhancement. The 4 mass-like lesions were misdiagnosed as renal malignancy. In 15 patients with follow-up imaging examinations, the number and size of renal lesions decreased after oral hormone treatment. The serum IgG4 levels were significantly decreased after therapy in all patients.

CONCLUSION

IgG4-RKD has various imaging appearances. Although the mass-like appearance mimics renal malignancy in some patients, progressive contrast enhancement in the lesion with elevated serum IgG4 suggests IgG4-RKD.

Differentiation of focal autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an inflammatory process of the pancreas that occurs most commonly in elderly males and clinically can mimic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and present with jaundice, weight loss, and abdominal pain. Mass-forming lesions in the pancreas are seen in the focal form of AIP and both clinical and imaging findings can overlap those of pancreatic cancer. The accurate distinction of AIP from pancreatic cancer is of utmost importance as it means avoiding unnecessary surgery in AIP cases or inaccurate steroid treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Imaging concomitantly with serological examinations (IgG4 and Ca 19-9) plays an important role in the distinction between these entities. Characteristic extra-pancreatic manifestations as well as favorable good response to treatment with steroids are characteristic of AIP. This paper will review current diagnostic parameters useful in differentiating between focal AIP and pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Autoimmune pancreatitis: an update

OBJECTIVE

Since the time of inception of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), our knowledge of autoimmune pancreatitis has expanded significantly. The aim of this review is to provide an update on clinical manifestations, diagnosis, imaging features, and treatment of AIP.

BACKGROUND AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Type 1 AIP is the pancreatic manifestation of IgG4-related systemic disease, which can be diagnosed using a combination of clinical, histopathological, pancreatic imaging findings in conjunction with manifestation in other organs, as well of responsiveness to steroid treatment. It is vital to differentiate AIP from pancreatic cancer since both can mimic each other clinically and radiologically. Type 2 AIP is a rare but distinct subtype of AIP which occurs mostly in the younger patient.

CONCLUSION

AIP is steroid-responsive chronic pancreatitis with distinct manifestations on imaging.

Relationship of pancreas volume to tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption following pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption are established risk factors for diseases of the pancreas. With the recent advances in imaging modalities (such as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging), opportunities have arisen to study pancreas size, in both health and disease. Studies investigating the relationship between tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and total pancreas volume (TPV) - a holistic measure of pancreatic exocrine reserve - are lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate the associations between MR-derived TPV and tobacco smoking/alcohol consumption.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited individuals with a history of pancreatitis and healthy controls. A validated questionnaire was used to ascertain current and lifetime tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption. TPV was quantified using MR images by two independent raters. Generalized additive models and linear regression analyses were conducted and adjusted for demographic, metabolic, and pancreatitis-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 107 individuals following pancreatitis and 38 healthy controls were included. There was no statistically significant difference in TPV between any of the tobacco smoking/alcohol consumption categories of individuals following pancreatitis and healthy controls, in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. In individuals following pancreatitis, multivariate linear regression found no association between TPV and 7 smoking- and alcohol-related variables. Sensitivity analyses constrained to individuals who did not abstain from either smoking or drinking following their first attack of pancreatitis did not yield statistical significance with TPV. In post-hoc analysis, age was significantly inversely associated with TPV in the most adjusted model (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate the association between tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and MR-derived TPV following pancreatitis. It appears that age, but not tobacco smoking or alcohol consumption, is associated with a significantly reduced TPV.

Autoimmune pancreatitis not otherwise specified (NOS): Clinical features and outcomes of the forgotten type

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a well-recognized fibroinflammatory disease of the pancreas. Despite the significant number of studies published on AIP type 1 and 2, no studies have been focused on AIP type not otherwise specified (NOS) and therefore very little is known about clinical features and long-term outcomes of these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical and radiological features of AIP type NOS-patients.

METHODS

Patients classified as AIP type NOS at clinical onset included in our database prospectively maintained since 1995 were evaluated. Epidemiological, clinical data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included in the study. The clinical onset was mainly characterized by weight loss, jaundice and acute pancreatitis. Eight patients (17.4%) were reclassified as AIP type 2 during follow-up because of the development of ulcerative colitis. Seven patients (15.2%) experienced relapse after steroid treatment but only one (2.2%) needed immunosuppressive drugs because of recurrent relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

AIP type NOS shares clinical features similar to AIP type 2 and a relevant proportion of patients was reclassified as AIP type 2 during follow-up because of the development of ulcerative colitis. The risk of relapse is low but not irrelevant.

Chronic Pancreatitis or Pancreatic Tumor? A Problem-solving Approach

Certain inflammatory pancreatic abnormalities may mimic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at imaging, which precludes accurate preoperative diagnosis and may lead to unnecessary surgery. Inflammatory conditions that may appear masslike include mass-forming chronic pancreatitis, focal autoimmune pancreatitis, and paraduodenal pancreatitis or "groove pancreatitis." In addition, obstructive chronic pancreatitis can mimic an obstructing ampullary mass or main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Secondary imaging features such as the duct-penetrating sign, biliary or main pancreatic duct skip strictures, a capsulelike rim, the pancreatic duct-to-parenchyma ratio, displaced calcifications in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis, the "double duct" sign, and vessel encasement or displacement can help to suggest the possibility of an inflammatory mass or a neoplastic process. An awareness of the secondary signs that favor a diagnosis of malignant or inflammatory lesions in the pancreas can help the radiologist to perform the differential diagnosis and determine the degree of suspicion for malignancy. Repeat biopsy or surgical resection may be necessary to achieve an accurate diagnosis and prevent unnecessary surgery for inflammatory conditions. Online supplemental material and DICOM image stacks are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2019.

Pancreatic tumor in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a diagnostic challenge

Background

The co-occurrence of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic tumor (PaT) has been previously reported. Pure AIP cases have favorable prognosis and are primarily treated with steroids, while AIP cases with PaT are associated with poor prognosis where the primary management is pancreatic resection. However, it’s a challenge to timely identify the concurrent PaT in AIP because of their similar clinical and radiological manifestations.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data in two medical centers from January 2010 to April 2019. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) completion of abdominal CT imaging before invasive procedures to the pancreas, 2) a final diagnosis of type 1 AIP using the 2011 international consensus diagnostic criteria, 3) follow-up duration of at least one month unless AIP and PaT were identified simultaneously. The presence of PaT in AIP was made based on histopathological confirmation, and the absence of PaT in AIP was defined as no pathological or radiological evidence of concurrent PaT. Clinical and radiological characteristics including gender, age, surveillance period, serum IgG4 and Ca-199 levels, biopsy, extrapancreatic involvement, CT and MR (if performed) imaging characteristics were compared between AIP with and without PaT. The Fisher’s exact test was used for qualitative variables, and nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables. A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 74 patients with type 1 AIP were included, of which 5 (6.7%) had the concurrent PaT. The subtypes were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (3/5), solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma in the pancreas (1/5) and cholangiocarcinoma in the pancreatic segment (1/5), respectively. Gender (p = 0.044), the pattern of pancreatic enlargement (p = 0.003), heterogeneity (p = 0.015), low-density (p = 0.004) on CT and rim enhancement on MRI (p = 0.050) differed significantly between AIP with and without PaT. None of the low-density characteristics on CT or other assessed MRI characteristics could significantly differentiate the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Female, focal pancreatic enlargement, pancreatic heterogeneity, low-density on CT and rim enhancement on MRI are suggestive of the concurrent PaT in type 1 AIP. The characteristics of low-density on CT or other MRI characteristics did not provide further diagnostic values.

Duct-obstructive pancreatitis with granulocytic epithelial lesion in a patient with ulcerative colitis: An atypical manifestation of type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis?

Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) typically presents with diffuse or focal enlargement of the pancreas; however, its diverse clinical presentation has not yet been clarified. We herein described a 46-year-old man with a 1-month history of ulcerative colitis who presented with imaging features of a mass-like lesion in the pancreatic body with upstream duct dilatation and serum CA19-9 elevation. He underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for suspected malignancy. Histologically, the area radiologically suspected to be duct dilatation consisted of necrotic tissue, in which the disrupted main pancreatic duct was involved. The area radiologically suspected to be the mass lesion showed features of pancreatitis without discrete mass. In addition, several ducts showed neutrophilic duct injury similar to granulocytic epithelial lesions observed in type 2 AIP. Immunohistochemistry revealed the aberrant expression of IL-8 in the pancreatic ductules and infiltrating CD3-positive T-lymphocytes, findings recently identified in type 2 AIP. The present case is not typical for either type 2 AIP or other known conditions, but extreme examples of type 2 AIP may present with ductal obstruction because of severe neutrophilic duct injury. IL-8 immunostaining may also assist in establishing a diagnosis of type 2 AIP with an atypical presentation.

Differentiating focal autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI with special emphasis on the arterial phase

OBJECTIVES

To compare focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) using contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI), and to assess diagnostic performance of the lesion contrast at arterial phase (AP) (Contrast_AP) for differentiating between the two diseases.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with focal-type AIP and 72 patients with PDA were included. All included patients underwent CE-MRI with triple phases. The signal intensity (SI) of the mass and normal pancreas was measured at each phase, and the lesion contrast (SI_pancreas/SI_mass) was compared between AIP and PDA groups. The sensitivity and specificity of Contrast_AP using an optimal cutoff point were compared with those of key imaging features specific to AIP and PDA.

RESULTS

The lesion contrast differed significantly between AIP and PDA groups at all phases of CE-MRI; the maximum difference was observed at AP. For AIP, the sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (87.5%) of Contrast_AP (cutoff ≤ 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 38.9-88.9%; specificity, 48.6-95.8%), except for the halo sign. For PDA, the sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (94.4%) of Contrast_AP (cutoff > 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 40.3-68.1%; specificity, 72.2-94.4%), except for the discrete mass.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative analysis of the lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at AP, was helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA. The diagnostic performance of Contrast_AP was mostly comparable or higher than those of the key imaging features.

KEY POINTS

• Diagnosis of focal-type AIP vs. PDA using imaging techniques is extremely challenging. • Lesion contrast in the arterial-phase MRI differs significantly between focal-type AIP and PDA. • Quantitative analysis of lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at the arterial phase, is helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA.

Type 1 and Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Distinctive Clinical and Pathological Features, But Are There Any Differences at Magnetic Resonance? Experience From a Referral Center

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging findings of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and to find radiological patterns that could differentiate type 1 and type 2 AIP.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with diagnosis of AIP were enrolled. Image analysis included pancreatic signal intensity abnormalities, enhancement pattern, extrapancreatic involvement, and main pancreatic duct alterations.

RESULTS

Pancreatic parenchyma resulted in hypointensity on T1-weighted images in 65 (98.5%) of 66 cases in type 1 and in 17 (94.5%) of 18 in type 2 (P > 0.05) and in hyperintensity on T2-weighted images in 41 (62%) of 66 and in 15 (83.4%) of 18, respectively (P > 0.05). Lesions were hypovascular in 64 (97%) of 66 cases in type 1 and in 16 (88.9%) of 18 in type 2 with delayed contrast retention in 56 (84.8%) of 66 and in 17 (94.5%) of 18, respectively (P > 0.05). Autoimmune cholangitis was found in 29 (43.9%) of 66 patients with type 1 and in 3 (16.7%) of 18 with type 2 (P = 0.02); renal involvement was observed in 20 (30.3%) of 66 and 1 (5.5%) of 18, respectively (P = 0.02). Both subtypes presented with multiple stenoses (P > 0.05). Dilation of upstream duct was more frequent in type 1 (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging is useful in detecting extrapancreatic involvement, typically seen in type 1. Dilation of the upstream duct suggests type 1 AIP.

Gastric varices and splenic vein obstruction during steroid treatment for autoimmune pancreatitis: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Few cases of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) complicated by gastric varices, in the absence of splenic vein obstruction, have been described in the medical literature. The findings in this case parallel those of 3 previously described cases from Japan and support a pathologic explanation for the evolution of gastric varices in relation to early splenomegaly and the role of steroid therapy for AIP.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 50-year-old male with a history of transfusion-requiring erosive gastritis and recently diagnosed AIP on steroid therapy for 2 weeks presented with a 2-day history of lightheadedness, abdominal pain, and melena.

DIAGNOSIS

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed prominent varices in the gastric fundus. An abdominal ultrasound with Doppler demonstrated patency of the splenic, hepatic, and portal veins. Review of previous imaging revealed that the splenic vein and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) were occluded prior to the diagnosis of AIP and steroid therapy initiation.

OUTCOME

Following resolution of hemodynamic instability through fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion, the remainder of his hospital course was uneventful. Subsequent to discontinuation of steroid therapy, he developed near total reocclusion of both the splenic vein and SMV.

LESSON

Early steroid treatment should be considered in patients with uncomplicated AIP to prevent the occlusive vascular complications that are frequently associated with the pathophysiology of this disease process.

Pancreas volume in health and disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The pancreas plays a central role in metabolism and is involved in the pathogenesis of several diseases. Pancreas volume is a holistic quantitative measure of pancreas size but the clinical relevance of pancreas volumetry is poorly understood. Areas covered: The aim was to systematically review studies in adults that used computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to measure pancreas volume in health and disease, to determine normal pancreas volume range, and to quantify changes in pancreas volume that are associated with disease. Expert commentary: The normal pancreas volume range in adults is 71-83 cm³, with no statistically significant difference between men and women. Type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes are associated with a progressively reduced pancreas volume. Overweight and obesity are associated with a progressively increased pancreas volume. There is a paucity of studies on pancreas volume in the setting of diseases of the exocrine pancreas, which should become a research priority in the future.

Comparison of diagnostic performance between CT and MRI in differentiating non-diffuse-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To intraindividually compare the diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in differentiating non-diffuse-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA).

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with non-diffuse-type AIP and 122 patients with PDA, who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MRI with MR pancreatography, were included. Two blinded radiologists independently rated their confidence in differentiating the two diseases on a 5-point scale, and the diagnostic performances of CT and MRI were compared. The presence of key imaging features to differentiate AIP and PDA were compared between CT and MRI.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly greater on MRI (0.993-0.995) than on CT (0.953-0.976) for both raters (p≤0.035). The sensitivities of MRI were higher than those of CT for the diagnosis of AIP (88.5-90.2% vs. 77-80.3%, p≤0.07) and PDA (97.5-99.2% vs. 91.8-94.3%, p≤0.031) for both raters, although the difference for AIP was statistically marginal (p=0.07) for rater 1. In AIP, multiple pancreatic masses, delayed homogeneous enhancement of the pancreatic mass, and multiple main pancreatic duct (MPD) strictures were observed significantly more frequently using MRI than CT (p≤0.008). In PDA, discrete pancreatic mass and MPD stricture were observed significantly more frequently using MRI than CT (p≤0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of MRI is better for differentiating non-diffuse-type AIP from PDA, which is due to the superiority of MRI over CT in demonstrating the key distinguishing features of both diseases.

KEY POINTS

• Imaging differential diagnosis of non-diffuse-type AIP and PDA is challenging. • MRI has better diagnostic performance than CT in differentiating non-diffuse-type AIP from PDA. • MRI is superior to CT in demonstrating key distinguishing features of non-diffuse-type AIP and PDA.

MR Imaging of Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is characterized by autoimmune inflammatory destruction of the pancreatic tissue. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis. AIP type 1 is the pancreatic manifestation of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease and is associated with IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration and fibrosis of multiple organ systems. Type 2 is a related disease with pancreatic inflammation with or without concurrent inflammatory bowel disease. The authors demonstrate the imaging findings that are associated with the pancreatic and extra-pancreatic manifestations of AIP. They emphasize the common MR imaging and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings to help make the diagnosis of AIP.

Abdominal manifestations of IgG4-related disease: a pictorial review

In the last decade, autoimmune pancreatitis has become recognised as part of a wider spectrum of IgG4-related disease, typically associated with elevated serum IgG4 levels and demonstrating a response to corticosteroid therapy. Radiologically, there is imaging overlap with other benign and neoplastic conditions. This pictorial review discusses the intra-abdominal manifestations of this disease on cross-sectional imaging before and after steroid treatment and the main radiological features which help to distinguish it from other key differentials.

TEACHING POINTS

• Autoimmune pancreatitis is part of a spectrum of IgG4-related disease. • Diagnosis is based on raised serum IgG4, clinical, radiological and histopathological findings. • Cross-sectional imaging can demonstrate the typical findings of abdominal IgG4-related disease. • Cross-sectional imaging can be used to monitor response to corticosteroid treatment.

A Rare Multifocal Pattern of Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis with Negative IgG4: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall That May Mimic Multifocal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an increasingly recognized form of acute pancreatitis characterized by obstructive jaundice with a rapid and dramatic treatment response to steroid therapy. Recently, AIP has been divided into two distinct phenotypes: lymphoplasmocytic sclerosing pancreatitis AIP (type 1) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis AIP (type 2); each of which have their own distinct demographics, diagnostic criteria, and histopathological features. We report, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of a multifocal pattern of type 2 AIP characterized with both CT and MR imaging. This rare imaging pattern of AIP may mimic the appearance of more worrisome malignant etiologies such as multifocal pancreatic adenocarcinoma or lymphoma, with overlapping imaging characteristics potentially complicating or delaying diagnosis. Therefore, recognition of this atypical pattern of AIP and avoidance of this potential diagnostic pitfall is crucial.

[Hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases in IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases]

BACKGROUND

IgG4-related diseases are rare systemic multiorgan diseases and can thus affect any organ system. The incidence of diagnosis has significantly increased due to increasing awareness.

OBJECTIVE

In the abdomen the hepatopancreaticobiliary system provides an essential organ system for the expression of IgG4-associated autoimmune diseases. The focus here is autoimmune pancreatitis type 1 but IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis and IgG4-associated hepatopathy, which can also occur in combination are less well-known.

METHODS

Various mostly Asiatic, histologically-based diagnostic systems, such as HISORt or international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) are available for the diagnostics of hepatopancreaticobiliary IgG4-related autoimmune diseases, in which imaging techniques playing an increasingly important role.

RESULTS

In addition to generalized organ swelling further morphological and also functional imaging criteria have become increasingly well-known for autoimmune pancreatitis, such as late enhancement or the imaging response to steroid therapy. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERP) can provide valuable information for the diagnostics of IgG4-related diseases in the hepatopancreaticobiliary system.

CONCLUSION

IgG4-related autoimmune diseases of the hepatopancreaticobiliary system are a rare group of diseases in which increasing knowledge of the radiological appearance also leads to an increasingly frequency of diagnosis. IgG4-related diseases must be distinguished from non-necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, which is often difficult but has significant therapeutic consequences for the patients.

Azathioprine Maintenance Therapy to Prevent Relapses in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

Steroids are used to induce remission in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Low-dosage steroid therapy or immunosuppressant (IMs) has been proposed as maintenance therapy to prevent AIP relapse. Few and conflicting data have been published on the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) in preventing AIP relapse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indication and efficacy of AZA as maintenance therapy to prevent disease relapse in AIP.

METHODS

Patients suffering from AIP diagnosed according to the ICDC in type 1, type 2, and not otherwise specified (NOS) were divided in those treated with AZA (AZA⁺ group) as maintenance therapy and not treated with maintenance therapy (AZA^- group). Exclusion criteria were: previous pancreatic surgery, other autoimmune diseases as indication for AZA treatment, and use of IMs different from AZA. Drug safety, clinical and instrumental outcome of AZA⁺ patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients (18 Males and 5 Females, mean age 54±11 years) in AZA⁺ group and 97 (58 Males and 39 Females, mean age 45±18 years) in AZA^- group were compared. In AZA⁺ group, patients were significantly older (P=0.043), type 1 AIP was more frequently diagnosed (87 vs. 51%, P=0.006), sIgG4 higher (758±625 vs. 311±409 mg/dl, P<0.001), other organ involvement (OOI) more frequently observed (83 vs. 48%, P=0.002), with higher frequency of relapse before AZA treatment (78 vs. 14%, P<0.001). Three patients in AZA⁺ group required drug discontinuation because of adverse events. Twenty patients were therefore evaluated for outcome. Six out of 20 patients (30%) relapsed after 24±15 months (5 in pancreas and 1 on biliary tract). They were retreated with steroids and continued AZA. Two out of 6 patients (33%) had a second relapse,after respectively 11 months (in pancreas and kidney) and 22 months (in kidney).

CONCLUSIONS

AZA is an effective and safe treatment to prevent AIP relapses.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare and underdiagnosed fibrosclerosing inflammatory variant of chronic pancreatitis. Its true incidence and prevalence in the general population is still not confirmed despite advances in medicine. Differentiating it from pancreatic cancer is of paramount importance. In this imaging review, we highlight the imaging findings of this intriguing entity.