1
|
O'Regan PW, Dewhurst C, O'Mahony AT, O'Regan C, O'Leary V, O'Connor G, Ryan D, Maher MM, Young R. Split-bolus single-phase versus single-bolus split-phase CT acquisition protocols for staging in patients with testicular cancer: A retrospective study. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:628-633. [PMID: 38330895 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Computed tomography (CT) imaging has become indispensable in the management of medical oncology patients. Risks associated with high cumulative effective dose (CED) are relevant in testicular cancer patients. Split-bolus protocols, whereby the contrast medium injection is divided into two, followed by combining the required phase images in a single scan acquisition has been shown to provide images of comparable image quality and less radiation dose compared to single-bolus split-phase CT for various indications. We retrospectively evaluated the performance of split-bolus and single-bolus protocols in patients having follow-up CT imaging for testicular cancer surveillance. METHODS 45 patients with testicular cancer undergoing surveillance CT imaging of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis who underwent split-bolus and single-bolus protocols were included. Quantitative image quality analysis was conducted by placing region of interests in pre-defined anatomical sub-structures within the abdominal cavity. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiation dose in the form of dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were recorded. RESULTS The DLP and ED for the single-bolus, split-phase acquisition was 506 ± 89 mGy cm and 7.59 ± 1.3 mSv, respectively. For the split-bolus, single-phase acquisition, 397 ± 94 mGy∗cm and 5.95 ± 1.4 mSv, respectively (p < 0.000). This represented a 21.5 % reduction in radiation dose exposure. The SNR for liver, muscle and fat for the single-bolus were 7.4, 4.7 and 8, respectively, compared to 5.5, 3.8 and 7.4 in the split-bolus protocol (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In a testicular cancer patient cohort undergoing surveillance CT imaging, utilization of a split-bolus single-phase acquisition CT protocol enabled a significant reduction in radiation dose whilst maintaining subjective diagnostic acceptability. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Use of split-bolus, single-phase acquisition has the potential to reduce CED in surveillance of testicular cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W O'Regan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - C Dewhurst
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
| | - A T O'Mahony
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital/Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
| | - C O'Regan
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
| | - V O'Leary
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
| | - G O'Connor
- Department of Radiology, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
| | - D Ryan
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - M M Maher
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - R Young
- Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College, Cork, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Larsen SKA, Løgager V, Bylov C, Nellemann H, Agerbæk M, Als AB, Pedersen EM. Can whole-body MRI replace CT in management of metastatic testicular cancer? A prospective, non-inferiority study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1221-1230. [PMID: 35389110 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03996-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Concerns of imaging-related radiation exposure in young patients with high survival rates have increased the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in testicular cancer (TC) stage I. However, computed tomography (CT) is still preferred for metastatic TC. The purpose of this study was to compare whole-body MRI incl. diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) with contrast-enhanced, thoracoabdominal CT in metastatic TC. METHODS A prospective, non-inferiority study of 84 consecutive patients (median age 33 years) with newly diagnosed metastatic TC (February 2018-January 2021). Patients had both MRI and CT before and after treatment. Anonymised images were reviewed by experienced radiologists. Lesion malignancy was evaluated on a Likert scale (1 benign-4 malignant). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated on patient and lesion level. The primary outcome was demonstrating non-inferiority regarding sensitivity of MRI compared to CT. The non-inferiority margin was set at 5%. ROC curves and interobserver agreement were calculated. RESULTS On patient level, MRI had 98% sensitivity and 75% specificity compared to CT. On lesion level within each modality, MRI had 99% sensitivity and 78% specificity, whereas CT had 98% sensitivity and 88% specificity. MRI sensitivity was non-inferior to CT (difference 0.57% (95% CI - 1.4-2.5%)). The interobserver agreement was substantial between CT and MRI. CONCLUSION MRI with DWIBS was non-inferior to contrast-enhanced CT in detecting metastatic TC disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION www. CLINICALTRIALS gov NCT03436901, finished July 1st 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vibeke Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Herlev Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Catharina Bylov
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Hanne Nellemann
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Anne Birgitte Als
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Erik Morre Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chovanec M, Lauritsen J, Bandak M, Oing C, Kier GG, Kreiberg M, Rosenvilde J, Wagner T, Bokemeyer C, Daugaard G. Late adverse effects and quality of life in survivors of testicular germ cell tumour. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:227-245. [PMID: 33686290 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00440-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Currently, ~95% of patients with testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) are cured, resulting in an increasing number of TGCT survivors. Although cured, these men face potential late adverse effects and reduced quality of life. Survivors face a twofold increased risk of second malignant neoplasms after chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with evidence of dose-dependent associations. For survivors managed with surveillance or treated with radiotherapy, the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is comparable to the risk in the general population, whereas treatment with chemotherapy increases the risk of life-threatening CVD, especially during treatment and after 10 years of follow-up. Other adverse effects are organ-related toxicities such as neuropathy and ototoxicity. Pulmonary and renal impairment in patients with TGCT treated with chemotherapy is limited. Survivors of TGCT might experience psychosocial distress including anxiety disorders, fear of cancer recurrence and TGCT-specific issues, such as sexual dysfunction. Late adverse effects can be avoided in most patients with stage I disease if followed on a surveillance programme. However, patients with disseminated disease can experience toxicities associated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and/or adverse effects related to surgery for residual disease. The severity of adverse effects increases with dose of both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This Review discusses the most recent data concerning the late adverse effects of today's standard treatments for TGCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Chovanec
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University, National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Jakob Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Bandak
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoph Oing
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gry Gundgaard Kier
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Kreiberg
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Josephine Rosenvilde
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Unenhanced MRI of the abdomen and pelvis for surveillance of patients with stage 1 testicular cancer post-radical orchiectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:1157-1162. [PMID: 32901295 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02715-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ability of unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect metastatic lymphadenopathy in men with stage 1 testicular cancer on surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS With IRB approval, we identified 23 consecutive men with stage 1 testicular cancer (diagnosed after orchiectomy) undergoing surveillance with unenhanced MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. Three blinded radiologists (2 inexperienced R1/R2 and 1 experienced R3) independently assessed MRI for: presence, location and size of abnormal lymph nodes and degree of confidence (5-point Likert scale) in diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was tabulated and compared between groups using ROC. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic. RESULTS 17.4% (4/23) men developed 6 metastatic lymph nodes (reference standard: interval development from baseline, size > 1.0 cm short axis). R1 and R2 detected 75% (3/4) patients with abnormal lymph nodes, compared to R3 who detected all four cases. False positive interpretations occurred in: 5.2% (1/19) R1, 10.5% (2/19) R2 and no patients for R3. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were: R1: 75% (95% CI 19.4-99.4%), 94.7% (74.0-99.9%) and 0.85 (0.59-1.00), R2: 75% (19.4-99.4%), 89.5% (66.9-98.7%) and 0.82 (0.57-1.00) and, R3: 100% (95% 39.8-100.0%), 100% (82.4-100%) and 1.00 (1.00-1.00) with no difference in AUC between readers (p = 0.383). Comparison in accuracy between readers is limited due to the small sample size. Inter-observer agreement was substantial (K = 0.62). Median (range) degree of confidence scores were rated: R1 5 (5-5), R2 4 (3-5) and, R3 5 (5-5). CONCLUSION In this study, unenhanced MRI was adequate for surveillance of stage 1 testicular cancer; however, radiologist inexperience may lead to errors.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cho T, Kreatsoulas D, Fritz J, McGregor JM, Hardesty DA. An institutional review of hospital resource utilization and patient radiation exposure in shunted idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44:3359-3373. [PMID: 33611722 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01502-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) frequently utilize healthcare services and undergo radiological studies to assess refractory headache symptoms despite cerebrospinal fluid diversion. To delineate the clinical utility of different imaging modalities and to estimate cumulative patient radiation exposure in shunted patients with IIH, we retrospectively reviewed 100 randomly selected patients with IIH and a prior cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedure treated at our institution between July 2010 and August 2018. Patients had an average of 16.3 office (SD ± 13.8), 12.4 emergency department (± 21.0), and 4.6 inpatient (± 5.1) encounters over an average 4.8 years of follow-up. Patients underwent an average of 9.0 head CTs (± 8.1), 10.3 shunt series x-rays (± 11.2), and 4.3 MRIs (± 3.7). Approximated radiation exposure per patient was 21.4 mSv (± 18.7). Radiological studies performed for acute symptoms usually demonstrated no actionable findings (82.5% CTs, 97.5% shunt series x-rays, and 79.6% MRIs). Shunted IIH patients undergo numerous radiological studies and are subject to considerable levels of radiation, yet imaging shows actionable findings in less than 10% percent of radiographic studies. IIH patients may benefit from radiation-reducing protocols and the use of alternative imaging to assess symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Cho
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Kreatsoulas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Joel Fritz
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - John M McGregor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Douglas A Hardesty
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Doan Hall, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Larsen SKA, Agerbæk M, Jurik AG, Pedersen EM. Ten years of experience with MRI follow-up of testicular cancer stage I: a retrospective study and an MRI protocol with DWI. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1374-1381. [PMID: 32684054 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1794035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with testicular cancer (TC) are mainly young and survival rates are high. MRI has several times been proposed to replace CT in follow-up of this patient group to reduce image-related radiation exposure. However, current evidence is scarce for the use of MRI in this context. AIMS First, to retrospectively evaluate the ability of MRI of the retroperitoneum and pelvis to detect relapse in patients with TC stage I. Second, to present a relevant MRI protocol of the retroperitoneum and pelvis with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of written radiology reports compared to clinical data from clinical practice from 2010 to 2018. The cohort consists of 2487 MRIs of the retroperitoneum and pelvis in 759 patients with TC stage I (524 seminoma (69.0%), 235 non-seminoma (31.0%)), including 102 patients (13.4%) with confirmed relapse. Confirmed relapse was defined when treatment was initiated for metastatic TC. RESULTS Ninety-five patients had a relapse in the MRI scan field during follow-up. MRI of the retroperitoneum and pelvis showed a high sensitivity of 93.8% and a high specificity of 97.4% for detecting TC relapse. The sensitivity for detecting relapse ≥10 mm in short axis lymph node diameter was 100%. The negative predictive value was 99.7%, the positive predictive value was 59.9% and the accuracy was 97.3%. CONCLUSIONS MRI of the retroperitoneum and pelvis constitutes a safe alternative to CT in follow-up of patients with TC stage I with both a high sensitivity and a high specificity. We present a robust MRI protocol with DWI and estimate that MRI follow-up of TC stage I can be easily implemented in most modern radiology departments. Registration: Conducted with permission from the Danish Data Protection Agency (1-16-02-323-16) and the Danish Health Authority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Grethe Jurik
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferrero A, Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Krambeck AE, Lieske JC, McCollough CH. Understanding, justifying, and optimizing radiation exposure for CT imaging in nephrourology. Nat Rev Urol 2019; 16:231-244. [PMID: 30728476 PMCID: PMC6447446 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0148-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
An estimated 4-5 million CT scans are performed in the USA every year to investigate nephrourological diseases such as urinary stones and renal masses. Despite the clinical benefits of CT imaging, concerns remain regarding the potential risks associated with exposure to ionizing radiation. To assess the potential risk of harmful biological effects from exposure to ionizing radiation, understanding the mechanisms by which radiation damage and repair occur is essential. Although radiation level and cancer risk follow a linear association at high doses, no strong relationship is apparent below 100 mSv, the doses used in diagnostic imaging. Furthermore, the small theoretical increase in risk of cancer incidence must be considered in the context of the clinical benefit derived from a medically indicated CT and the likelihood of cancer occurrence in the general population. Elimination of unnecessary imaging is the most important method to reduce imaging-related radiation; however, technical aspects of medically justified imaging should also be optimized, such that the required diagnostic information is retained while minimizing the dose of radiation. Despite intensive study, evidence to prove an increased cancer risk associated with radiation doses below ~100 mSv is lacking; however, concerns about ionizing radiation in medical imaging remain and can affect patient care. Overall, the principles of justification and optimization must remain the basis of clinical decision-making regarding the use of ionizing radiation in medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ferrero
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Amy E Krambeck
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - John C Lieske
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chung P, O'Malley ME, Jewett MAS, Bedard PL, Panzarella T, Sturgeon J, Moore MJ, Hamilton R, Hansen AR, Anson-Cartwright L, Gospodarowicz M, Warde P. Detection of Relapse by Low-dose Computed Tomography During Surveillance in Stage I Testicular Germ Cell Tumours. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 2:437-442. [PMID: 31277780 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard-dose computed tomography (SDCT) scans are associated with radiation exposure during stage I testicular cancer surveillance. OBJECTIVE To evaluate low-dose CT (LDCT) for clinical use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this single-arm prospective study, patients on surveillance for stage I testicular germ cell tumour underwent SDCT and LDCT scans on their first visit after enrolment. The adequacy of LDCT image quality was assessed for subsequent use. Patients were followed with LDCT only and suspected relapse was confirmed by SDCT. OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We assessed whether initial LDCT scans were of sufficient quality for routine clinical use. We compared mean differences in nodal size at relapse between LDCT and SDCT using a one-sample paired t test. The relapse free-rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 257 patients, one was excluded because of inadequate image quality. At median follow-up of 5.25 yr, 35 patients had relapsed, 33 with retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. The 2- and 5-yr relapse-free rates were 89.5% and 85.3%, respectively. The mean size of retroperitoneal nodal relapse was 17.3 and 17.5mm on the short axis, 23.2 and 22.7mm on the long axis, and 26.1 and 26.7mm on craniocaudal length for LDCT and SDCT, respectively. The mean difference between LDCT and SDCT was 0.14mm (p=0.55) short axis, -0.54mm (p=0.092) long axis, and -0.51mm (p=0.086) length. A limitation was the lack of a control arm. CONCLUSIONS LDCT image quality was adequate for clinical use, and retroperitoneal nodal relapse was detected with minimal differences seen between LD and SDCT. LDCT can be safely adopted and will decrease overall radiation exposure in stage I germ cell tumour surveillance. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied the use of low-dose computed tomography scans for detecting testicular cancer recurrence in lymph nodes of the abdomen and pelvis and found that they were safe, effective and would potentially reduce overall X-ray exposure. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03142802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Martin E O'Malley
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tony Panzarella
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeremy Sturgeon
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Malcolm J Moore
- British Columbia Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Robert Hamilton
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lynn Anson-Cartwright
- Departments of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quantifying Decreased Radiation Exposure From Modern CT Scan Technology and Surveillance Programs of Germ Cell Tumors. Am J Clin Oncol 2018; 41:949-952. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
10
|
McCarthy CJ, Kilcoyne A, Li X, Cahalane AM, Liu B, Arellano RS, Uppot RN, Gee MS. Radiation Dose and Risk Estimates of CT-Guided Percutaneous Liver Ablations and Factors Associated with Dose Reduction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41:1935-1942. [PMID: 30132100 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-018-2066-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the radiation dose associated with CT-guided percutaneous liver ablations and identify potential risk factors that result in higher radiation doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between June 2011 and June 2015, 245 consecutive patients underwent 304 CT-guided liver ablation treatments. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and procedural parameters were identified and analyzed. The peak skin dose and effective dose were assessed for each procedure. Excess relative risk related to radiation effects was calculated. A logistic regression model was prepared by means of stepwise logistic regression to identify variables predictive of increased radiation exposure. RESULTS Tumor ablations were performed with microwave (n = 220), radiofrequency (n = 74) or irreversible electroporation (IRE) (n = 10). The mean peak skin dose for ablations was 239.2 ± 136.4 mGy, and the mean effective dose was 36.6 ± 22.3 mSv. Of the patient and procedural parameters that were analyzed, increasing weight, use of intravenous contrast and/or hydrodissection during the procedure, together with treatment of multiple lesions in the same sitting were all associated with higher radiation exposure. The mean increase in the absolute risk of fatal malignancy from a single procedure was 0.18% (range 0.02-0.9%). No deterministic skin changes were identified in the patient cohort. CONCLUSION The overall risk of stochastic and deterministic effects from radiation associated with CT-guided ablations is low compared with other inherent procedural complications. This study identifies several factors that are associated with higher radiation dose in percutaneous liver ablation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin J McCarthy
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Aoife Kilcoyne
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Xinhua Li
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Alexis M Cahalane
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Bob Liu
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ronald S Arellano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Raul N Uppot
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Michael S Gee
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kasraie N, Jordan D, Keup C, Westra S. Optimizing Communication With Parents on Benefits and Radiation Risks in Pediatric Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:809-817. [PMID: 29555251 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Effective radiation risk communication is a core competency for radiology care providers and can prevent and resolve potential conflicts while helping achieve effective public health safeguards. The authors present a synopsis of the challenges to holding such dialogue and review published methods for strengthening and maintaining this discourse. Twelve strategies are discussed in this article that can help alleviate concerns about the iatrogenic risk associated with medical imaging using radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Kasraie
- Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.
| | - David Jordan
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Sjirk Westra
- MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Clinical stage I testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) are highly curable neoplasms. The treatment of stage I testicular cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Standard options after radical orchiectomy for seminoma include active surveillance, radiation therapy or 1-2 cycles of carboplatin, and options for nonseminoma include active surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or 1-2 cycles of bleomycin plus etoposide plus cisplatin (BEP). All the options should be discussed with each patient and treatment choices should be made by shared decision making as virtually all patients with clinical stage I TGCT can be cured of their disease. Long-term survival of men with stage I disease is ∼99% and care must be taken to limit the long-term risks of treatment. Orchiectomy is curative in the majority of patients. The management of clinical stage I TGCT remains controversial among experts at high-volume centres throughout the world. The main controversy is whether to overtreat a substantial number of patients with stage I disease to prevent relapse, or to observe and treat only patients who experience disease relapse as adjuvant treatment and surveillance strategy both bring curative outcome. Thus, a summary of the available evidence in stage I disease and recommendations for disease management from a high-volume centre such as Indiana University might be of interest to treating clinicians.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sadow CA, Maurer AN, Prevedello LM, Sweeney CJ, Silverman SG. CT restaging of testicular germ cell tumors: The incidence of isolated pelvic metastases. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85:1439-44. [PMID: 27423685 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We determined the incidence of isolated pelvic metastases at restaging computed tomography (CT) in patients with testicular germ cell tumors to consider if imaging the pelvis could be omitted. METHODS After receiving IRB approval for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, medical records of 560 men (mean age 32.8) with 583 testicular germ cell tumors who underwent 3683 restaging CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis were reviewed to determine the proportion of patients with metastatic disease in the pelvis alone, as verified by histology or by resolution after therapy. Chi-square statistical analysis tested the association between factors currently thought to predispose patients to pelvic metastases. Patients were also categorized by clinical stage, tumor histology, and initial treatment. RESULTS Isolated pelvic metastases were detected in nine (1.6%) of 560 men. Neither bulky abdominal disease (p=0.85) nor extratesticular invasion by the primary tumor (p=0.37) were statistically significant in predicting which patients were more likely to have isolated pelvic metastases. Among the nine patients with isolated pelvic recurrence, only three (0.7%) of 408 men with no known pelvic disease at initial staging and no tumor marker elevation at restaging had isolated pelvic metastases. Isolated pelvic recurrence was not statistically different when analyzed by initial stage and treatment. CONCLUSION The incidence of isolated pelvic metastases in testicular germ cell tumors at restaging CT is low, but no group of patients was found to be without risk. Therefore, given the small, if any, risk of radiation-induced harm, the decision about whether to include routine pelvic CT in surveillance protocols should be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl A Sadow
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| | - Amma N Maurer
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, United States; Current address: Department of Radiology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd., Washington DC 20007, United States
| | - Luciano M Prevedello
- Department of Radiology and Center for Evidenced-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, United States; Current address: Department of Radiology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- Division of Genitourinary Oncology, Department of Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Stuart G Silverman
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McCollough CH, Bushberg JT, Fletcher JG, Eckel LJ. Answers to Common Questions About the Use and Safety of CT Scans. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90:1380-92. [PMID: 26434964 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Revised: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/20/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Articles in the scientific literature and lay press over the past several years have implied that computed tomography (CT) may cause cancer and that physicians and patients must exercise caution in its use. Although there is broad agreement on the latter point--unnecessary medical tests of any type should always be avoided--there is considerable controversy surrounding the question of whether, or to what extent, CT scans can lead to future cancers. Although the doses used in CT are higher than those used in conventional radiographic examinations, they are still 10 to 100 times lower than the dose levels that have been reported to increase the risk of cancer. Despite the fact that at the low doses associated with a CT scan the risk either is too low to be convincingly demonstrated or does not exist, the magnitude of the concern among patients and some medical professionals that CT scans increase cancer risk remains unreasonably high. In this article, common questions about CT scanning and radiation are answered to provide physicians with accurate information on which to base their medical decisions and respond to patient questions.
Collapse
|
15
|
Barrisford GW, Kreydin EI, Preston MA, Rodriguez D, Harisighani MG, Feldman AS. Role of imaging in testicular cancer: current and future practice. Future Oncol 2015; 11:2575-86. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The article provides a summary of the epidemiologic and clinical aspects of testicular malignancy. Current standard imaging and novel techniques are reviewed. Present data and clinical treatment trends have favored surveillance protocols over adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy for low-stage testicular malignancy. This has resulted in increasing numbers of imaging studies and the potential for increased long-term exposure risks. Understanding imaging associated risks as well as strategies to minimize these risks is of increasing importance. The development, validation and incorporation of alternative lower risk highly efficacious and cost-effective imaging techniques is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen W Barrisford
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Center 7E, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Evgeniy I Kreydin
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Center 7E, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Mark A Preston
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Center 7E, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Dayron Rodriguez
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Center 7E, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | - Adam S Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey Center 7E, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Radiation exposure from CT-guided ablation of renal masses: effects on life expectancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:335-42. [PMID: 25615756 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to project the effects of radiation exposure on life expectancy (LE) in patients who opt for CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) instead of surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to compare LE losses attributable to radiation exposure in hypothetical 65-year-old patients who undergo CT-guided RFA versus surgery for small (≤ 4 cm) RCC. We incorporated mortality risks from RCC, radiation-induced cancers (for procedural and follow-up CT scans), and all other causes; institutional data informed the RFA procedural effective dose. Radiation-induced cancer risks were generated using an organ-specific approach. Effects of varying model parameters and of dose-reduction strategies were evaluated in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS. Cumulative RFA exposures (up to 305.2 mSv for one session plus surveillance) exceeded those from surgery (up to 87.2 mSv). In 65-year-old men, excess LE loss from radiation-induced cancers, comparing RFA to surgery, was 11.7 days (14.6 days for RFA vs 2.9 days for surgery). Results varied with sex and age; this difference increased to 14.6 days in 65-year-old women and to 21.5 days in 55-year-old men. Dose-reduction strategies that addressed follow-up rather than procedural exposure had a greater impact. In 65-year-old men, this difference decreased to 3.8 days if post-RFA follow-up scans were restricted to a single phase; even elimination of RFA procedural exposure could not achieve equivalent benefits. CONCLUSION. CT-guided RFA remains a safe alternative to surgery, but with decreasing age, the higher burden of radiation exposure merits explicit consideration. Dose-reduction strategies that target follow-up rather than procedural exposure will have a greater impact.
Collapse
|
17
|
Piechowiak EI, Peter JFW, Kleb B, Klose KJ, Heverhagen JT. Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Agents Amplify DNA Radiation Damage at CT. Radiology 2015; 275:692-7. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
18
|
Projected Effects of Radiation-Induced Cancers on Life Expectancy in Patients Undergoing CT Surveillance for Limited-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Markov Model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:1228-33. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.13287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
19
|
Radiographic screening of infants and young children with genetic predisposition for rare malignancies: DICER1 mutations and pleuropulmonary blastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:W475-82. [PMID: 25794098 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.12802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the risks of radiation in screening strategies using chest radiographs and CT to detect a rare cancer in a genetically predisposed population against the risks of undetected disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS A decision analytic model of diagnostic imaging screening strategies was built to predict outcomes and cumulative radiation doses for children with DICER1 mutations screened for pleuropulmonary blastoma. Screening strategies compared were chest radiographs followed by chest CT for a positive radiographic result and CT alone. Screening frequencies ranged from once in 3 years to once every 3 months. BEIR VII (model VII proposed by the Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation) risk tables were used to predict excess cancer mortality for each strategy, and the corresponding loss of life expectancy was calculated using Surveillance Epidemiologic and End Results (SEER) statistics. Loss of life expectancy owing to undetected progressive pleuropulmonary blastoma was estimated on the basis of data from the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma Registry. Sensitivity analysis was performed for all model parameters. RESULTS Loss of life expectancy owing to undetected disease in an unscreened population exceeded that owing to radiation-induced cancer for all screening scenarios investigated. Increases in imaging frequency decreased loss of life expectancy for the combined (chest radiographs and CT) screening strategy but increased that for the CT-only strategy. This was because loss of life expectancy for combined screening is dominated by undetected disease, whereas loss of life expectancy for CT screening is dominated by radiation-induced cancers. CONCLUSION Even for a rare disease such as pleuropulmonary blastoma, radiographic screening of infants and young children with cancer-predisposing mutations may result in improved life expectancy compared with the unscreened population. The benefit of screening will be greater for diseases with a higher screening yield.
Collapse
|
20
|
Lago-Hernandez CA, Feldman H, O'Donnell E, Mahal BA, Perez V, Howard S, Rosenthal M, Cheng SC, Nguyen PL, Beard C, D'Amico AV, Sweeney CJ. A refined risk stratification scheme for clinical stage 1 NSGCT based on evaluation of both embryonal predominance and lymphovascular invasion. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1396-401. [PMID: 25888612 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance is an increasingly accepted approach for managing patients with germ-cell tumors (GCTs) after an orchiectomy. Here we investigate a time-to-relapse stratification scheme for clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminoma GCT (NSGCT) patients according to factors associated with relapse and identify a group of patients with a lower frequency and longer time-to-relapse who may require an alternative surveillance strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 266 CS1 GCT patients from the IRB-approved DFCI GCT database that exclusively underwent surveillance following orchiectomy from 1997 to 2013. We stratified NSGCT patients according to predominance of embryonal carcinoma (EmbP) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), using a 0, 1, and 2 scoring system. Cox regression and conditional risk analysis were used to compare each NSGCT group to patients in the seminomatous germ-cell tumor (SGCT) category. Median time-to-relapse values were then calculated among those patients who underwent relapse. Relapse-free survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Fifty (37%) NSGCT and 20 (15%) SGCT patients relapsed. The median time-to-relapse was 11.5 versus 6.3 months for the SGCT and NSGCT groups, respectively. For NSGCT patients, relapse rates were higher and median time-to-relapse faster with increasing number of risk factors (RFs). Relapse rates (%) and median time-to-relapse (months) were 25%/8.5 months, 41%/6.8 months and 78%/3.8 months for RF0, RF1 and RF2, respectively. We found a statistically significant difference between SGCT and patients with one or two RFs (P < 0.001) but not between SGCT and NSGCT RF0 (P = 0.108). CONCLUSION NSGCT patients grouped by a risk score system based on EmbP and LVI yielded three groups with distinct relapse patterns -and patients with neither EmbP nor LVI appear to behave similar to SGCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Lago-Hernandez
- Harvard Medical School, Boston Department of Medical Oncology-Genitourinary Division, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - H Feldman
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York Department of Medical Oncology-Genitourinary Division, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - E O'Donnell
- Department of Medical Oncology-Genitourinary Division, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - B A Mahal
- Harvard Medical School, Boston Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - V Perez
- University of Puerto Rico Medical School, San Juan PR
| | - S Howard
- Departments of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - M Rosenthal
- Departments of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S C Cheng
- Biostatistics/Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - P L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - C Beard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - A V D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - C J Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology-Genitourinary Division, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zores T, Mouracade P, Duclos B, Saussine C, Lang H, Jacqmin D. Surveillance des séminomes testiculaires de stade I : résultats oncologiques sur 20ans. Prog Urol 2015; 25:282-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
22
|
Microsimulation model of CT versus MRI surveillance of Bosniak IIF renal cystic lesions: should effects of radiation exposure affect selection of imaging strategy? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 203:W629-36. [PMID: 25415728 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.12550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of radiation-induced cancer risks in patients with Bosniak category IIF lesions undergoing CT versus MRI surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed a Markov-Monte Carlo model to determine life expectancy losses attributable to radiation-induced cancers in hypothetical patients undergoing CT versus MRI surveillance of Bosniak IIF lesions. Our model tracked hypothetical patients as they underwent imaging surveillance for up to 5 years, accounting for potential lesion progression and treatment. Estimates of radiation-induced cancer mortality were generated using a published organ-specific radiation-risk model based on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII methods. The model also incorporated surgical mortality and renal cancer-specific mortality. Our primary outcome was life expectancy loss attributable to radiation-induced cancers. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the results with variability in key parameters. RESULTS The mean number of examinations per patient was 6.3. In the base case, assuming 13 mSv per multiphase CT examination, 64-year-old men experienced an average life expectancy decrease of 5.5 days attributable to radiation-induced cancers from CT; 64-year-old women experienced a corresponding life expectancy loss of 6.9 days. The results were most sensitive to patient age: Life expectancy loss attributable to radiation-induced cancers increased to 21.6 days in 20-year-old women and 20.0 days in 20-year-old men. Varied assumptions of each modality's (CT vs MRI) depiction of lesion complexity also impacted life expectancy losses. CONCLUSION Microsimulation modeling shows that radiation-induced cancer risks from CT surveillance for Bosniak IIF lesions minimally affect life expectancy. However, as progressively younger patients are considered, increasing radiation risks merit stronger consideration of MRI surveillance.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goals of this article are to provide an overview of controversial aspects of imaging-based screening and to elucidate potential risks that may offset anticipated benefits. CONCLUSION Current controversial topics associated with imaging-based screening include false-positive results, incidental findings, overdiagnosis, radiation risks, and costs. Alongside the benefits of screening, radiologists should be prepared to discuss these additional diagnostic consequences with providers and patients to better guide shared decision making regarding imaging-based screening.
Collapse
|
24
|
Provision of Information to Individuals Regarding the Risks Related to Medical Radiation. CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-014-0083-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
25
|
Cox JA, Gajjar SR, Lanni TB, Swanson TA. Cost analysis of adjuvant management strategies in early stage (stage I) testicular seminoma. Res Rep Urol 2015; 7:1-7. [PMID: 25610815 PMCID: PMC4293930 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s74125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acceptable post-orchiectomy adjuvant therapy strategies for stage I seminoma patients include surveillance, para-aortic radiation therapy (RT), dog-leg RT, and a single cycle of carboplatin. The required follow-up recommendations were amended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in 2012. Given a cause-specific survival of nearly 100%, a closer analysis of the reimbursement for each treatment strategy is warranted. METHODS NCCN guidelines were used to design treatment plans for each acceptable adjuvant treatment strategy. Follow-up charges were generated for 10 years based on 2012 (version 1.2012; unchanged in current version 1.2013) and 2011 NCCN (version 2.2011) surveillance recommendations. The 2012 Medicare reimbursement rates were used to calculate each treatment strategy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios to compare the treatment options. RESULTS Under the current NCCN follow-up recommendations, the total reimbursements generated over 10 years of surveillance, para-aortic RT, dog-leg RT, and carboplatin were $10,643, $11,678, $9,662, and $10,405, respectively. This is compared with the reimbursements as per the 2011 NCCN recommendations: $20,986, $11,517, $9,394, and $20,365 respectively. Factoring the rates of relapse into a salvage model, observation was found to be more costly and less effective ($-1,831, $-7,318, $-7,010) in the adjuvant management of stage I seminoma patients. CONCLUSION Based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, para-aortic RT, dog-leg RT, and carboplatin are cost-effective options for the treatment of stage I seminoma when compared with observation; however, surveillance could potentially spare as many as 80%-85% of men diagnosed with stage I seminoma from additional therapy after radical inguinal orchiectomy. Such cost and reimbursement analyses are becoming increasingly relevant, but are not meant to usurp sound clinical judgment. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Cox
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Shefali R Gajjar
- University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas B Lanni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sullivan CJ, Murphy KP, McLaughlin PD, Twomey M, O'Regan KN, Power DG, Maher MM, O'Connor OJ. Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in young patients with testicular cancer. Eur Radiol 2014; 25:1005-13. [PMID: 25500962 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3507-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Revised: 10/30/2014] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Risks associated with high cumulative effective dose (CED) from radiation are greater when imaging is performed on younger patients. Testicular cancer affects young patients and has a good prognosis. Regular imaging is standard for follow-up. This study quantifies CED from diagnostic imaging in these patients. METHODS Radiological imaging of patients aged 18-39 years, diagnosed with testicular cancer between 2001 and 2011 in two tertiary care centres was examined. Age at diagnosis, cancer type, dose-length product (DLP), imaging type, and frequency were recorded. CED was calculated from DLP using conversion factors. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. RESULTS In total, 120 patients with a mean age of 30.7 ± 5.2 years at diagnosis had 1,410 radiological investigations. Median (IQR) surveillance was 4.37 years (2.0-5.5). Median (IQR) CED was 125.1 mSv (81.3-177.5). Computed tomography accounted for 65.3 % of imaging studies and 98.3 % of CED. We found that 77.5 % (93/120) of patients received high CED (>75 mSv). Surveillance time was associated with high CED (OR 2.1, CI 1.5-2.8). CONCLUSIONS Survivors of testicular cancer frequently receive high CED from diagnostic imaging, mainly CT. Dose management software for accurate real-time monitoring of CED and low-dose CT protocols with maintained image quality should be used by specialist centres for surveillance imaging. KEY POINTS • CT accounted for 98.3 % of CED in patients with testicular cancer. • Median CED in patients with testicular cancer was 125.1 mSv • High CED (>75 mSv) was observed in 77.5 % (93/120) of patients. • Dose tracking and development of low-dose CT protocols are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Sullivan
- Department of Radiology, Cork and Mercy University Hospitals, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Daugaard G, Gundgaard MG, Mortensen MS, Agerbæk M, Holm NV, Rørth M, von der Maase H, Christensen IJ, Lauritsen J. Surveillance for Stage I Nonseminoma Testicular Cancer: Outcomes and Long-Term Follow-Up in a Population-Based Cohort. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3817-23. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.5831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe treatment results in a large cohort with stage I nonseminoma germ cell cancer (NSGCC) treated in a surveillance program. Patients and Methods From January 1, 1984, to December 31, 2007, 1,226 patients with stage I NSGCC, including high-risk patients with vascular invasion, were observed in a surveillance program. Results The relapse rate after orchiectomy alone was 30.6% at 5 years. Presence of vascular invasion together with embryonal carcinoma and rete testis invasion in the testicular primary identified a group with a relapse risk of 50%. Without risk factors, the relapse risk was 12%. Eighty percent of relapses were diagnosed within the first year after orchiectomy. The median time to relapse was 5 months (range, 1 to 308 months). Early relapses were mainly detected by increase in tumor markers, and late relapses were detected by computed tomography scans. Relapses after 5 years were seen in 0.5% of the whole cohort or in 1.6% of relapsing patients. The majority of relapses (94.4%) belonged to the good prognostic group according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification. The disease-specific survival at 15 years was 99.1%. Conclusion A surveillance policy for patients with stage I NSGCC is a safe approach associated with an excellent cure rate and an overall low treatment burden despite a high relapse rate in a small group of patients. We recommend surveillance for patients with stage I NSGCC with immediate systemic treatment at relapse. Clearly defined risk factors for relapse are presented if an option of risk-adapted treatment is preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gedske Daugaard
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Maria Gry Gundgaard
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mette Saksø Mortensen
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Niels Vilstrup Holm
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikael Rørth
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Hans von der Maase
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ib Jarle Christensen
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jakob Lauritsen
- Gedske Daugaard, Maria Gry Gundgaard, Mette Saksø Mortensen, Mikael Rørth, Hans von der Maase, Ib Jarle Christensen, and Jakob Lauritsen, Copenhagen University, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Mads Agerbæk, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; and Niels Vilstrup Holm, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kiatpongsan S, Meng L, Eisenberg JD, Herring M, Avery LL, Kong CY, Pandharipande PV. Imaging for appendicitis: should radiation-induced cancer risks affect modality selection? Radiology 2014; 273:472-82. [PMID: 24988435 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare life expectancy (LE) losses attributable to three imaging strategies for appendicitis in adults-computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US) followed by CT for negative or indeterminate US results, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-by using a decision-analytic model. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this model, for each imaging strategy, LE losses for 20-, 40-, and 65-year-old men and women were computed as a function of five key variables: baseline cohort LE, test performance, surgical mortality, risk of death from delayed diagnosis (missed appendicitis), and LE loss attributable to radiation-induced cancer death. Appendicitis prevalence, test performance, mortality rates from surgery and missed appendicitis, and radiation doses from CT were elicited from the published literature and institutional data. LE loss attributable to radiation exposure was projected by using a separate organ-specific model that accounted for anatomic coverage during a typical abdominopelvic CT examination. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate effects of model input variability on results. RESULTS Outcomes across imaging strategies differed minimally-for example, for 20-year-old men, corresponding LE losses were 5.8 days (MR imaging), 6.8 days (combined US and CT), and 8.2 days (CT). This order was sensitive to differences in test performance but was insensitive to variation in radiation-induced cancer deaths. For example, in the same cohort, MR imaging sensitivity had to be 91% at minimum (if specificity were 100%), and MR imaging specificity had to be 62% at minimum (if sensitivity were 100%) to incur the least LE loss. Conversely, LE loss attributable to radiation exposure would need to decrease by 74-fold for combined US and CT, instead of MR imaging, to incur the least LE loss. CONCLUSION The specific imaging strategy used to diagnose appendicitis minimally affects outcomes. Paradigm shifts to MR imaging owing to concerns over radiation should be considered only if MR imaging test performance is very high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sorapop Kiatpongsan
- From the Massachusetts General Hospital Institute for Technology Assessment, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114 (S.K., L.M., J.D.E., M.H., C.Y.K., P.V.P.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (S.K.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.L.A., C.Y.K., P.V.P.); and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (C.Y.K., P.V.P.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Prioritizing examination-centered over patient-centered dose reduction: a hazard of institutional "benchmarking". AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202:1062-8. [PMID: 24758661 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to evaluate whether examination-specific radiation dose metrics reliably measure an institution's success in reducing cancer risks. MATERIALS AND METHODS We projected health benefits from dose-reduction programs in a hypothetical institution that sought to decrease exposures from abdominopelvic CT. Using modeling techniques to project radiation-induced cancer risks and tertiary center data to inform the institution's abdominopelvic CT age distribution, we compared a program in which effective doses were reduced equally (from 10 to 7 mSv) across all scans with programs in which dose reduction was age dependent. For each program, we projected lethal cancers averted, life expectancy gained, and average institutional dose achieved. Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods were used to estimate uncertainty in projections. RESULTS The analysis's age distribution drew from 20,979 CT scans; 39% were from patients 65 years old and older. To illustrate trends yielded, if all patients in the hypothetical institution underwent 7-mSv (instead of 10-mSv) scans, we projected the maximum number of lethal cancers averted to be seven per 100,000 patients, and maximum life expectancy gained to be 0.26 days per patient, when averaged over the institution's population. When restricting dose reduction (from 10 to 7 mSv) to patients younger than 65 years, benefits were slightly lower (five lethal cancers averted per 100,000 patients and 0.22 days per patient gained); however, the average institutional dose was substantially higher (8.2 mSv). Although dose reduction in patients 65 years old and older accounted for only 16% of possible institutional life expectancy gains, this patient group contributed disproportionately (39%) to the institution's average dose. CONCLUSION Institutional examination-specific dose metrics can be misleading, because the least-benefited patients may contribute disproportionately toward "improved" averages.
Collapse
|
30
|
Kruger JF, Chen AH, Rybkin A, Leeds K, Frosch DL, Goldman LE. Clinician perspectives on considering radiation exposure to patients when ordering imaging tests: a qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23:893-901. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
31
|
Broder JS, Frush DP. Content and Style of Radiation Risk Communication for Pediatric Patients. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11:238-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2013] [Accepted: 10/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
32
|
de Wit R, Bosl GJ. Optimal Management of Clinical Stage I Testis Cancer: One Size Does Not Fit All. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:3477-9. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.51.0479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald de Wit
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
The time has arrived for national reimbursement of screening CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201:73-9. [PMID: 23789660 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.10656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE CT colonography (CTC) has been fully validated as an accurate screening test for colorectal carcinoma and is being disseminated globally. There is an abundance of new literature addressing the prior concerns of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Specific areas related to radiation dose, extracolonic findings, and generalizability of CTC to senior patients are discussed. CONCLUSION The time has arrived for national reimbursement of CTC in the United States.
Collapse
|