Quantitative Image Quality Comparison of Reduced- and Standard-Dose Dual-Energy Multiphase Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis CT

We present a new image quality assessment method for determining whether reducing radiation dose impairs the image quality of computed tomography (CT) in qualitative and quantitative clinical analyses tasks. In this Institutional Review Board-exempt study, we conducted a review of 50 patients (male, 22; female, 28) who underwent reduced-dose CT scanning on the first follow-up after standard-dose multiphase CT scanning. Scans were for surveillance of von Hippel–Lindau disease (N = 26) and renal cell carcinoma (N = 10). We investigated density, morphometric, and structural differences between scans both at tissue (fat, bone) and organ levels (liver, heart, spleen, lung). To quantify structural variations caused by image quality differences, we propose using the following metrics: dice similarity coefficient, structural similarity index, Hausdorff distance, gradient magnitude similarity deviation, and weighted spectral distance. Pearson correlation coefficient and Welch 2-sample t test were used for quantitative comparisons of organ morphometry and to compare density distribution of tissue, respectively. For qualitative evaluation, 2-sided Kendall Tau test was used to assess agreement among readers. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations were designed to examine significance of image differences for clinical tasks. Qualitative judgment served as an overall assessment, whereas detailed quantifications on structural consistency, intensity homogeneity, and texture similarity revealed more accurate and global difference estimations. Qualitative and quantitative results indicated no significant image quality degradation. Our study concludes that low(er)-dose CT scans can be routinely used because of no significant loss in quantitative image information compared with standard-dose CT scans.

The Role of Limited Head Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Pediatric Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Malfunction

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of children with suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) malfunction has evolved into a diagnostic dilemma. This patient population is vulnerable not only to the medical risks of hydrocephalus and surgical complications but also to silent but harmful effects of ionizing radiation secondary to imaging used to evaluate shunt efficacy and patency. The combination of increased medical awareness regarding ionizing radiation and public concern has generated desire to reduce the reliance on head computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of VPS malfunction. Many centers have started to investigate the utility of low-dose CT scans and alternatives, such as fast magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of VP shunt malfunction in order to keep radiation exposure as low as reasonably achievable. This pilot study hopes to add to the armamentarium available to the clinician charged with evaluating this challenging patient population by testing the feasibility of a limited CT protocol as an alternative to a full head CT examination.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a limited head CT protocol compared with a complete head CT for the evaluation of children presenting to the pediatric emergency department with suspected shunt malfunction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients who received a head CT for suspected VPS malfunction evaluation at a tertiary care children's hospital from January 2001 through January 2013. Children were included in the pilot study if they had at least 2 CT scans in this study period interpreted by a specific senior attending neuroradiologist. For each patient enrolled, a limited series was generated from the most recent CT scan by selecting four representative axial slices based on the sagittal scout image. These 4 slices where selected at the level of the fourth ventricle, third ventricle, basal ganglia level, and lateral ventricles, respectively. A blinded, senior attending neuroradiologist first reviewed the limited 4-slice CT data set and was asked to determine if the ventricular system had increased, decreased, or remained stable. Subsequently, the neuroradiologist compared their interpretation of the limited examination with the official report from the full CT data set as the standard of reference as well as the interpretation of the most recent prior scan.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (age range, 2 months to 18 years; average age, 6.4 years (SD, 4.2), 54% male) were included in the study. Forty-four of 46 (95.7%) limited CT scans matched the official report of the full CT scan. No cases of increased ventricular size were missed (100% positive predictive value for increased ventricular size). The use of a limited head CT (4 axial images) instead of a complete head CT (average of 31 axial images in our studied patients) confers a radiation dose reduction of approximately 87%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot study demonstrates that utilization of limited head CT scan in the evaluation of children with suspected VP shunt malfunction is a feasible strategy for the evaluation of the ventricular size. Further prospective and multidisciplinary studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of limited head CT for the clinical evaluation of VP shunt malfunction.

Doses metrics and patient age in CT

The aim of this study was to investigate how effective dose and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) change with patient age (size) for routine head and abdominal/pelvic CT examinations. Heads and abdomens of patients were modelled as a mass-equivalent cylinder of water corresponding to the patient 'effective diameter'. Head CT scans were performed at CTDIvol(S) of 40 mGy, and abdominal CT scans were performed at CTDIvol(L) of 10 mGy. Values of SSDE were obtained using conversion factors in AAPM Task Group Report 204. Age-specific scan lengths for head and abdominal CT scans obtained from the authors' clinical practice were used to estimate the dose-length product for each CT examination. Effective doses were calculated from previously published age- and sex-specific E/DLP conversion factors, based on ICRP 103 organ-weighting factors. For head CT examinations, the scan length increased from 15 cm in a newborn to 20 cm in adults, and for an abdominal/pelvic CT, the scan length increased from 20 cm in a newborn to 45 cm in adults. For head CT scans, SSDE ranged from 37.2 mGy in adults to 48.8 mGy in a newborn, an increase of 31 %. The corresponding head CT effective doses range from 1.4 mSv in adults to 5.2 mSv in a newborn, an increase of 270 %. For abdomen CT scans, SSDE ranged from 13.7 mGy in adults to 23.0 mGy in a newborn, an increase of 68 %. The corresponding abdominal CT effective doses ranged from 6.3 mSv in adults to 15.4 mSv in a newborn, an increase of 140 %. SSDE increases much less than effective dose in paediatric patients compared with adults because it does not account for scan length or scattered radiation. Size- and age-specific effective doses better quantify the total radiation received by patients in CT by explicitly accounting for all organ doses, as well as their relative radio sensitivity.

A radiation exposure index for CT

The purpose of this study is to define an Exposure Index for CT (EI(CT)) and to estimate the magnitude of the EI(CT) for common clinical CT examinations. For a single-axial rotation of a CT X-ray tube that includes only rays that pass through the patient, the CT Exposure Index (EI(CT)) is defined as the average Air Kerma that would be incident on an extended 360° detector array completely surrounding the patient. For an axial scan of a uniform cylindrical phantom, EI(CT) can be approximated as T × [(CTDI(air))/4] × [β°/360°] where T is the fractional transmission through the cylinder, CTDI(air) is the CT Dosimetry Index-determined 'free in air' at isocentre, and β/2 is the fan beam angle that will completely irradiate a cylindrical phantom at isocentre. The value of CTDI(air) can be estimated from the weighted CTDI (CTDI(w)) for a given CT examination, and the angle β depends on the irradiation geometry that can be obtained from the cylinder diameter (r) and the focus to isocentre distance (R). At a voltage of 120 kV, transmission through an adult head was ∼2.6%, through an adult abdomen∼0.4% and through a 5-y-old paediatric abdomen ∼3%. Average ratios of CTDI(air)/CTDI(w) were 1.42 ± 0.12 in 16-cm dosimetry phantom and 2.82 ± 0.37 in 32-cm phantom. Values of β ranged from 30.1° (R = 61 cm and r=8 cm) to 85.3° (R = 55 cm and r=20 cm). For an adult head CT examination, EI(CT) was estimated to be∼70 µGy at a CTDI(vol) of 75 mGy (16 cm), and for an adult abdominal CT examination, EI(CT) was estimated to be∼11 µGy at a CTDI(vol) of 25 mGy (32 cm). For an abdomen CT examination in a 5-y-old child, EI(CT) was estimated to be ∼21 µGy at a CTDI(vol) of 20 mGy (16 cm). The EI(CT) is introduced that provides a quantitative measure of the amount of the radiation used to generate images in any CT examination and is analogous to the average image receptor Exposure Index recently proposed for use in projection imaging. The EI(CT) metric provides operators with an objective index of the amount of the radiation used to create CT images and can be used to control quantum mottle in CT.

Low-dose CT in clinical diagnostics

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT) has become key for patient management due to its outstanding capabilities for detecting disease processes and assessing treatment response, which has led to expansion in CT imaging for diagnostic and image-guided therapeutic interventions. Despite these benefits, the growing use of CT has raised concerns as radiation risks associated with radiation exposure.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with fundamental concepts of dose metrics for assessing radiation exposure and weighting radiation-associated risks. The article also discusses general approaches for reducing radiation dose while preserving diagnostic quality. The authors provide additional insight for undertaking protocol optimization, customizing scanning techniques based on the patients' clinical scenario and demographics. Supplemental strategies are postulated using more advanced post-processing techniques for achieving further dose improvements.

EXPERT OPINION

The technologic offerings of CT are integral to modern medicine and its role will continue to evolve. Although, the estimated risks from low levels of radiation of a single CT exam are uncertain, it is prudent to minimize the dose from CT by applying common sense solutions and using other simple strategies as well as exploiting technologic innovations. These efforts will enable us to take advantage of all the clinical benefits of CT while minimizing the likelihood of harm to patients.