1
|
Roditis K, Tsiantoula P, Giannakopoulos NN, Antoniou A, Papaioannou V, Tzamtzidou S, Manou D, Seretis KG, Papas TT, Bessias N. Laparoscopic Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Trend for Addressing Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2584. [PMID: 38731113 PMCID: PMC11084248 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: this systematic review aims to explore the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) as an emerging trend for addressing a type II endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across several databases including Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. The search focused on articles reporting on the laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for the treatment of a type II endoleak post-EVAR. Data were extracted regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, technical success rates, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up results. Results: Our analysis included ten case studies and two retrospective cohort studies, comprising a total of 26 patients who underwent a laparoscopic ligation of the IMA between 2000 and 2023. The mean age of the cohort was 72.3 years, with a male predominance (92.3%). The mean AAA diameter at the time of intervention was 69.7 mm. The technique demonstrated a high technical success rate of 92.3%, with a mean procedure time of 118.4 min and minimal blood loss. The average follow-up duration was 19.9 months, with 73% of patients experiencing regression of the aneurysmal sac, and no reports of an IMA-related type II endoleak during the follow-up period. Conclusions: The laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for a type II endoleak following EVAR presents a promising, minimally invasive alternative with high technical success rates and favorable postoperative outcomes. Despite its potential advantages, including reduced contrast agent use and radiation exposure, its application remains limited to specialized centers. The findings suggest the need for further research in larger prospective studies to validate the effectiveness of this procedure and potentially broaden its clinical adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Roditis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Korgialenio-Benakio Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, 115 26 Athens, Greece; (P.T.); (N.-N.G.); (A.A.); (V.P.); (S.T.); (D.M.); (K.G.S.); (T.T.P.); (N.B.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Bastos Goncalves F, Bellmunt Montoya S, Berard X, Boyle JR, D'Oria M, Prendes CF, Karkos CD, Kazimierczak A, Koelemay MJW, Kölbel T, Mani K, Melissano G, Powell JT, Trimarchi S, Tsilimparis N, Antoniou GA, Björck M, Coscas R, Dias NV, Kolh P, Lepidi S, Mees BME, Resch TA, Ricco JB, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Branzan D, Cheng SWK, Dalman RL, Dick F, Golledge J, Haulon S, van Herwaarden JA, Ilic NS, Jawien A, Mastracci TM, Oderich GS, Verzini F, Yeung KK. Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:192-331. [PMID: 38307694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the care of patients with aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in succession to the 2011 and 2019 versions, with the aim of assisting physicians and patients in selecting the best management strategy. METHODS The guideline is based on scientific evidence completed with expert opinion on the matter. By summarising and evaluating the best available evidence, recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients have been formulated. The recommendations are graded according to a modified European Society of Cardiology grading system, where the strength (class) of each recommendation is graded from I to III and the letters A to C mark the level of evidence. RESULTS A total of 160 recommendations have been issued on the following topics: Service standards, including surgical volume and training; Epidemiology, diagnosis, and screening; Management of patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), including surveillance, cardiovascular risk reduction, and indication for repair; Elective AAA repair, including operative risk assessment, open and endovascular repair, and early complications; Ruptured and symptomatic AAA, including peri-operative management, such as permissive hypotension and use of aortic occlusion balloon, open and endovascular repair, and early complications, such as abdominal compartment syndrome and colonic ischaemia; Long term outcome and follow up after AAA repair, including graft infection, endoleaks and follow up routines; Management of complex AAA, including open and endovascular repair; Management of iliac artery aneurysm, including indication for repair and open and endovascular repair; and Miscellaneous aortic problems, including mycotic, inflammatory, and saccular aortic aneurysm. In addition, Shared decision making is being addressed, with supporting information for patients, and Unresolved issues are discussed. CONCLUSION The ESVS Clinical Practice Guidelines provide the most comprehensive, up to date, and unbiased advice to clinicians and patients on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms.
Collapse
|
3
|
Jalil H, Mahmood S, Zaman I, Osman A, Mustafa S, Saeed A. Inferior Mesenteric Artery Associated Type II Endoleaks: Are They Predictable? THE ARAB JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) diameter and risk of type II endoleak.
Subjects and Methods: A retrospective study design to review all EVARs performed over a 4-year period at a tertiary care center. Out of the total cohort of 400 patients who underwent EVAR, 41 patients (10.3%) developed type II endoleak. The mean IMA ostial diameter for patients with type II endoleak secondary to IMA contributories was 4mm, while the mean IMA diameter for patients with lumbar arteries contributing to the type II endoleak was 3.7mm.
Results: Statistical analysis using a paired t-test did not show a statistically significant difference in the IMA ostial diameter between the two groups.
Conclusion: There is no significant correlation between preprocedural IMA ostium diameter and type II endoleak development and hence, preprocedural IMA embolization is not an appropriate prophylactic management strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harun Jalil
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Mahmood
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Iftikhar Zaman
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Asaad Osman
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Mustafa
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Abdullah Saeed
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tenholt M. [The Prophylaxis of Type 2 Endoleaks is Relevant for Long Term Success of EVAR]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 146:493-497. [PMID: 34666363 DOI: 10.1055/a-1618-6773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
One out of 8 patients needs a reintervention after EVAR during the first 5 years. Two thirds of secondary interventions aim at treating endoleaks. The prevalence of complications doubles in the presence of endoleaks. Fourth generation stent grafts do not lead to a decrease in Type 2-associated reinterventions, but to better prevention of Type 1 and 3 endoleaks. Pretreatment of potential type 2 feeding arteries with embolising agents and treatment of the occurrence of type 2 endoleaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Tenholt
- Abteilung Gefäß- und Endovascular Chirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus und Sankt Hedwig-Klinik Abteilung für Gefäßchirurgie, Mannheim, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang H, Yang Y, Kou L, Sun H, Chen Z. Effectiveness of collateral arteries embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair to prevent type II endoleaks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vascular 2021; 30:813-824. [PMID: 34266336 DOI: 10.1177/17085381211032764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preventive collateral arteries embolization before endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to reduce type II endoleaks (T2EL), aneurysm enlargement, and re-interventions. METHODS A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted to identify articles in English, related to preventive collateral arteries embolization before EVAR, published until October 2020. RESULTS A total of 12 relevant studies, including 11 retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial, were identified and fulfilled the specified inclusion criteria. A total of 1706 patients in 11 studies were involved in the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of T2EL was 17.3% in the embolization group vs. 34.5% in the control group (OR 0.36, p < 0.01). The incidence of persistent T2EL was 15.3% vs. 30.0% (OR 0.37, p < 0.01). Five studies reported the incidence of sac enlargement, with the rate 10.2% vs. 24.9% (OR 0.25, p < 0.01). Nine studies reported T2EL related re-interventions, and it was 1.3% in the embolization group and 10.4% in control (OR 0.14, p < 0.01). The technical success of collateral arteries embolization was 92.1% (455/494) in the 12 studies. 1.2% (10/829) patients suffered a mild complication of collateral arteries embolization, and 2/829 patients died because of the embolization. CONCLUSION Collateral arteries embolization is a promising measure to prevent the occurrence of T2EL, sac enlargement, and re-intervention. High-quality studies need to be conducted to provide stronger evidence-based medical suggestions about the embolize operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanfang Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, 12517Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,12667Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Yaoguo Yang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, 12517Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,12667Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Kou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, 12517Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,12667Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Sun
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, 12517Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,12667Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Zhong Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, 12517Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,12667Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim SH, Litt HI. Surveillance Imaging following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: State of the Art. Semin Intervent Radiol 2020; 37:356-364. [PMID: 33041481 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR) has become a prominent modality for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Surveillance imaging is important for the detection of device-related complications, which include endoleak, structural abnormalities, and infection. Currently used modalities include ultrasound, X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Understanding the advantages and drawbacks of each modality, as well available guidelines, can guide selection of the appropriate technique for individual patients. We review complications following EVAR and advances in surveillance imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie H Kim
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Harold I Litt
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim HO, Yim NY, Kim JK, Kang YJ, Lee BC. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review. Korean J Radiol 2020; 20:1247-1265. [PMID: 31339013 PMCID: PMC6658877 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can be defined as an abnormal, progressive dilatation of the abdominal aorta, carrying a substantial risk for fatal aneurysmal rupture. Endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR) for AAA is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure that involves the placement of a bifurcated or tubular stent-graft over the AAA to exclude the aneurysm from arterial circulation. In contrast to open surgical repair, EVAR only requires a stab incision, shorter procedure time, and early recovery. Although EVAR seems to be an attractive solution with many advantages for AAA repair, there are detailed requirements and many important aspects should be understood before the procedure. In this comprehensive review, fundamental information regarding AAA and EVAR is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyoung Ook Kim
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Nam Yeol Yim
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
| | - Jae Kyu Kim
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Yang Jun Kang
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Byung Chan Lee
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ichihashi S, Takahara M, Fujimura N, Nagatomi S, Iwakoshi S, Bolstad F, Kichikawa K. Multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive inferior mesenteric artery embolisation during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair on aneurysm sac change: protocol of Clarify IMA study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031758. [PMID: 32066599 PMCID: PMC7044938 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Type II endoleak (EL) is frequently seen after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and is often considered responsible for aneurysm sac enlargement if it persists. In order to reduce type II EL and consequent sac enlargement, pre-emptive embolisation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), which is a main source for persistent type II EL, has been introduced in many vascular centres. At present, there is a lack of robust evidence to support the efficacy of pre-emptive embolisation of IMA on reduction of persistent type II EL with subsequent sac shrinkage. METHOD AND ANALYSIS This multicentre, randomised controlled trial will recruit 200 patients who have fusiform AAA ≥50 mm/rapidly enlarging fusiform AAA, with patent IMA, and randomly allocate them either to a pre-emptive IMA embolisation group or non-embolisation control group in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint is the difference of aneurysm sac volume change assessed by CT scans between the pre-emptive IMA embolisation group and the control group at 12 months after EVAR. The secondary endpoints are defined as change of aneurysm sac volume in both groups at 6 and 24 months, freedom from sac enlargement at 12 and 24 months after EVAR, prevalence of type II EL at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT, reintervention rate, aneurysm related mortality, overall survival, perioperative morbidity, volume of contrast media used during EVAR and dosage of radiation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol has been reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Nara Medical University (No. 2113). The findings of this study will be communicated to healthcare professionals, participants and the public through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry home page. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000035502.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mitsuyoshi Takahara
- Department of Diabetes Care Medicine and Department of Metabolic Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujimura
- Vascular Surgery, Saiseikai Central Hospital, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Spanos K, Nana P, Kouvelos G, Koutsias S, Arnaoutoglou E, Giannoukas AD, Matsagkas M. Factors associated with elimination of type II endoleak during the first year after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2020; 71:56-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
10
|
Plá Sánchez F, Martínez López I, Hernández Mateo MM, Marqués de Marino P, Ucles Cabeza O, Baturone Blanco A, Serrano Hernando FJ. Prognostic Value of Initial Aneurysmal Sac Regression after EVAR. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 64:109-115. [PMID: 31629125 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Revised: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of initial aneurysmal sac reduction after endovascular aneurysm repair on the evolution of aneurysmal sac over follow-up. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was made of patients subjected to elective treatment between January 2005 and December 2014, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. An analysis was made of the evolution of the aneurysmal sac according to its condition one year after surgery, defining of two groups: A (sac reduction) and B (stable sac). Follow-up by computed tomography (CT) angiography was made after one month and then every 6 months or annually, depending on the presence of endoleak. RESULTS A total of 128 patients were included. Fifty-one patients (39.8%) showed a significant decrease in diameter during the first year (group A), whereas 77 patients (60.2%) showed no initial decrease (group B). Preoperative CT angiography showed the patients in group A to have larger aneurysms (63.5 mm vs. 59.25; P = 0.048), a greater presence of posterior thrombus (68.6% vs. 30.7%; P < 0.001), and fewer patent lumbar vessels (56.9% vs. 83.1%; P = 0.001). The prevalence of endoleak at some point during follow-up was lower in group A (31.4% vs. 74% in group B; P < 0.001), and 100% of all aneurysmal growths were associated to the presence of endoleak. After 5 years, significant differences were observed in the growth-free rate (96.9% in group A vs. 85.2% in group B; hazard ratio [HR] 4.8 [1.1-21.4; P = 0.036]) and in the reintervention-free rate (95,7% vs. 84.6%; HR 6.6 [0.8-52.4; P = 0.07]). No reoperation in group A was due to type II endoleak. CONCLUSIONS The aneurysmal sac can be expected to take a favorable course in those cases characterized by initial aneurysmal sac reduction. These findings may imply a change in the follow-up protocol, even in cases with type II endoleak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferrán Plá Sánchez
- Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Isaac Martínez López
- Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Oscar Ucles Cabeza
- Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Orgera G, Tipaldi MA, Laurino F, Lucatelli P, Rebonato A, Paraskevopoulos I, Rossi M, Krokidis M. Techniques and future perspectives for the prevention and treatment of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Insights Imaging 2019; 10:91. [PMID: 31549250 PMCID: PMC6757092 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0774-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of endoleaks remains one of the main drawbacks of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms leading to the increase of the size of the aneurysmal sac and in most of the cases to repeated interventions. A variety of devices and percutaneous techniques have been developed so far to prevent and treat this phenomenon, including sealing of the aneurysmal sac, endovascular embolisation, and direct sac puncture. The aim of this review is to analyse the indications, the effectiveness, and the future perspectives for the prevention and treatment of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluigi Orgera
- Department of Radiology, Sant' Andrea University Hospital La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Florindo Laurino
- Department of Radiology, Sant' Andrea University Hospital La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierleone Lucatelli
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Rebonato
- The Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Michele Rossi
- Department of Radiology, Sant' Andrea University Hospital La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Miltiadis Krokidis
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Preoperative Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization is a Cost-effective Technique that May Reduce the Rate of Aneurysm Sac Diameter Enlargement and Reintervention After EVAR. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 60:85-94. [PMID: 31200030 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type II endoleaks are the most common complications after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVARs). Some studies have shown the benefit of preventive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization, but its efficacy and cost-effectiveness continue to be controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure on the increase in aneurysmal sac diameter during follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent the embolization of the IMA before EVAR in our center, between January 2014 and July 2016, were included. We retrospectively compared the diameter of the aortic aneurysm sac, the rate of endoleak and reinterventions, and the theoretical cost of management between these patients (group 2) and a historical cohort of patients treated for EVAR before January 2014 who did not undergo prior IMA embolization (group 1). RESULTS Two hundred twenty-four patients were retrospectively analyzed. After exclusion, we compared a group of 37 embolized patients with a control group of 46 patients. The rate of enlargement in the aneurysmal sac diameter was significantly higher in the control group at 2 years (27.9% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.025). The type II endoleak rate at 2 years was significantly higher in the control group (53.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.012), as was the aneurysm-related reintervention rate (31.1% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis confirmed these results. At 2 years of follow-up, there was no difference in the overall cost of patient management between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Preventive IMA embolization is an effective, reliable, and cost-effective technique that seems to reduce the rate of the aneurysmal sac diameter enlargement, type II endoleak, and reinterventions after EVAR.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gentsu T, Okada T, Yamaguchi M, Horinouchi H, Katayama N, Ueshima E, Koide Y, Sofue K, Gotake Y, Nomura Y, Tanaka H, Okita Y, Sugimoto K, Murakami T. Type II Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using the Endurant Stent Graft System for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Occluded Inferior Mesenteric Artery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 42:505-512. [PMID: 30515534 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-018-2140-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the incidence of type II endoleak (EL-II) and aneurysm enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Endurant stent graft in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with occluded inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2012 and 2017, 103 patients who underwent EVAR using the Endurant stent graft for AAA with occluded IMA (50 patients with prophylactic embolized IMA and 53 with spontaneous occluded IMA) were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of EL-II and aneurysm enlargement was evaluated. Predictive factors for persistent EL-II were evaluated based on patient characteristics, preprocedural anatomical characteristics, intraprocedural details, and postprocedural complications. RESULTS Incidence rates of early EL-II and persistent EL-II were 6.8% (7/103 patients) and 4.9% (5/103 patients), respectively. Aneurysm enlargement was found in 10 patients (9.7%), including all 5 patients with persistent EL-II, 3 with de novo EL-II, and 2 with no EL-II. The rates of freedom from aneurysm enlargement at 1, 2, and 3 years were 98.7%, 97.0%, and 93.1% for the group without persistent EL-II, and 80.0%, 60.0%, and 20.0% for the group with persistent EL-II (p < 0.001), respectively. The maximum aneurysm diameter (odds ratio (OR), 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.34; p = 0.0362) and the number of patent lumbar arteries (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.07-6.90; p = 0.0357) were predictive of persistent EL-II. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of EL-II after EVAR using the Endurant stent graft for AAA with occluded IMA was low, but most early EL-II persisted and resulted in aneurysm enlargement. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case Series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Gentsu
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takuya Okada
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
| | - Masato Yamaguchi
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hiroki Horinouchi
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Naoto Katayama
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Eisuke Ueshima
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Yutaka Koide
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Keitaro Sofue
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Yasuko Gotake
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Yoshikatsu Nomura
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hyogo Brain and Heart Center, 520, Saisho-ko, Himeji, Hyogo, 670-0981, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tanaka
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Yutaka Okita
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Takatsuki General Hospital, 1-3-13, Kosobe-chou, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1192, Japan
| | - Koji Sugimoto
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takamichi Murakami
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ajalat M, Williams R, Wilson SE. The natural history of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair justifies conservative management. Vascular 2018; 26:524-530. [DOI: 10.1177/1708538118766103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective Management of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair has been controversial. Some advocate for conservative management, while others believe that intervention is indicated. This study investigated the natural history of type 2 endoleaks in order to derive direction in management. Methods Patients who had endovascular aneurysm repair at the Veterans Affairs Long Beach were retrospectively identified and computerized tomographic angiography was independently reviewed by a radiologist and a vascular surgeon. Type 2 endoleaks were analyzed for the following outcomes: rupture, duration of endoleak, spontaneous resolution, changes in the size of the aneurysm sac, and reintervention rates. Results Of the 160 patients who had completed required follow-up to date (mean 3 years) after endovascular aneurysm repair, 39 (24.4%) patients were identified as having a type 2 endoleak on computerized tomographic angiography imaging. 6 (15.4%) of these 39 patients required repair due to aneurysm sac growth >1 cm. 2 (5.13%) were repaired with an open procedure and 4 (10.3%) with an endovascular approach. Of these 6 aneurysm leaks requiring repair, 4 (66.7%) had a simultaneous endoleak (types 1 or 3) in addition to the identified type 2 endoleak. Spontaneous resolution of type 2 endoleaks occurred in 16 (41.0%) patients. 4 patients (10.3%) had delayed type 2 endoleaks that presented 4, 9, 12, and 23 months after their 30 day post op computed tomography was normal. None of the 4 patients with delayed type 2 endoleaks required reintervention and none had aneurysm sac growth greater than 5 mm. Conclusions Overall, we found that 85% of patients who had type 2 endoleaks did not require intervention after a mean follow-up time of 3 years. The association of a type 1 or 3 endoleak with a type 2 endoleak was more likely to require correction due to aneurysm expansion >1 cm, thus type 2 endoleaks associated with another type of endoleak require more aggressive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ajalat
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Russell Williams
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Samuel E Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
- Department of Surgery, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schnitzbauer M, Güntner O, Wohlgemuth WA, Zeman F, Haimerl M, Stroszczynski C, Müller-Wille R. CT after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Diagnostic Accuracy of Diameter Measurements for the Detection of Aneurysm Sac Enlargement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:178-187.e3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Revised: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
16
|
Systematic review of laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for the treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66:1878-1884. [PMID: 28822664 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.07.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is frequently caused by persistent flow from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative and midterm efficacy of laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of endoleak. METHODS MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane databases and key references were searched with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology for studies reporting on laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR. RESULTS Eight case studies and one study of a retrospective nature were identified. In total, 20 patients (18 men; mean age, 73.6 ± 2 years; with a mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter of 64.3 ± 10 mm) who underwent post-EVAR laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for type II endoleak were analyzed. The mean time from EVAR until intervention ranged from 6 to 18 months. All but one patient were asymptomatic; in 9, the aneurysm sac was enlarged, and in 11, the endoleak was considered persistent without sac enlargement. The mean procedural duration was 99 ± 24 minutes, with technical success rate of 90% (18/20); in two cases, the patients were successfully reoperated on laparoscopically in 24 hours. The mean hospitalization was 3.6 ± 1.2 days, with 0% (0/20) perioperative and 30-day mortality. No patient underwent open conversion or showed signs of intestinal ischemia. During follow-up of 32.6 ± 12 months, 13 of 20 patients had aneurysm sac regression, whereas the rest had a stable sac diameter without evidence of persistent type II endoleak. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic ligation of the IMA for treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR is a feasible and safe technique in specialized centers with high technical success rate and good midterm outcomes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preoperative Risk Factors of Type II Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 41:284-293. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2016] [Revised: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
18
|
Preoperative Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization: A Valid Method to Reduce the Rate of Type II Endoleak after EVAR? Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 39:40-47. [PMID: 27531083 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Revised: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type II endoleak is the most commonly encountered endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Some have advocated preoperative inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization as a valid method for reducing the incidence of this endoleak, but controversies exist. We sought to demonstrate the impact of IMA embolization using a meta-analysis of currently available studies combined with our own experience. METHODS We conducted an institutional review board-approved, retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing IMA embolization before EVAR between the years 2010 and 2015 and used as a control a similar group of patients with patent IMA. We divided patients from our own experience and 5 other studies into 2 groups: those who did not undergo IMA embolization (control) before EVAR and those who did. Rates of type II endoleaks, aneurysm sac regression, and secondary interventions were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 620 patients from 6 studies were analyzed, including 258 patients who underwent an attempted IMA embolization before EVAR with a cumulative success rate of 99.2% (range, 93.8% to 100%). There was 1 fatality associated with IMA embolization. A meta-analysis showed that preoperative IMA embolization protected against type II endoleaks compared to the control group (odds ratio [OR], 0.31 [0.17-0.57]; P < 0.001, I2 = 43%). Furthermore, the rate of secondary intervention was significantly lower in the treatment group (OR, 0.12 [0.004-0.36]; P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). After IMA embolization, type II endoleak resulted from patent lumbar arteries in all 62 patients with persistent endoleak. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative embolization of the IMA protects against the development of type II endoleaks and secondary interventions and may potentially lead to a rapid aneurysm sac regression. The procedure can be performed with a high technical success rate and minimal complications and should be considered in patients with IMA >3 mm before EVAR. A randomized trial, however, is required to clearly delineate the clinical significance of this technique.
Collapse
|
19
|
Brown A, Saggu GK, Bown MJ, Sayers RD, Sidloff DA. Type II endoleaks: challenges and solutions. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2016; 12:53-63. [PMID: 27042087 PMCID: PMC4780400 DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s81275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Type II endoleaks are the most common endovascular complications of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR); however, there has been a divided opinion regarding their significance in EVAR. Some advocate a conservative approach unless there is clear evidence of sac expansion, while others maintain early intervention is best to prevent adverse late outcomes such as rupture. There is a lack of level-one evidence in this challenging group of patients, and due to a low event rate of complications, large numbers of patients would be required in well-designed trials to fully understand the natural history of type II endoleak. This review will discuss the imaging, management, and outcome of patients with isolated type II endoleaks following infra-renal EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Brown
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Greta K Saggu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew J Bown
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Robert D Sayers
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - David A Sidloff
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fujimura N, Obara H, Matsubara K, Watada S, Shibutani S, Akiyoshi T, Harada H, Kitagawa Y. Characteristics and Risk Factors for Type 2 Endoleak in an East Asian Population From a Japanese Multicenter Database. Circ J 2015; 80:118-23. [PMID: 26567485 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-15-0850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically distinct differences exist between East Asian and Caucasian subjects, but data for type 2 endoleak (T2EL) are limited in the East Asian population. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of East Asian T2EL using a Japanese multicenter database. METHODS AND RESULTS Retrospective analysis of 832 endovascular aneurysm repairs performed from 2008 to 2014 were conducted. T2EL was observed in 234 cases (28.1%), and in 32 cases (3.8%) it led to sac expansion >5 mm caused by isolated T2EL (median follow-up, 35.6 months). On univariate and multivariate analysis, non-smoker status (odds ratio [OR], 2.216; P<0.001), Excluder stent graft (OR, 2.027; P<0.001), and T2EL at final angiogram (OR, 2.080; P<0.001) were risk factors for T2EL. On multivariate analysis for isolated T2EL with sac expansion, only non-smoker status remained (OR, 2.671; P<0.001). Other than T1EL, isolated T2EL was the most significant risk factor for sac expansion (OR, 18.486; P<0.001). Furthermore, out of 11 transarterial embolization procedures initiated, 4 led to rupture during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS East Asian T2EL had a strong relationship with non-smoker status. Also, T2EL was a significant risk factor for sac expansion, which sometimes led to rupture even after intervention. Along with the high prevalence of T2EL observed, East Asian T2EL may not always be benign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Fujimura
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
There is a significant risk of complication following endovascular abdominal repair (EVAR), including endoleak, graft translocation, thrombosis, and infection. Surveillance imaging is important for detecting EVAR complication. Surveillance modalities include conventional X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and conventional angiography, with inherent advantages and drawbacks to each modality. The authors present common complications following EVAR, and recent advances in the key modalities for surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirnimesh Pandey
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Harold I Litt
- Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Biancari F, Mäkelä J, Juvonen T, Venermo M. Is Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization Indicated Prior to Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50:671-4. [PMID: 26319477 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2015] [Accepted: 06/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Type II endoleak is a common condition occurring after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR), and may result in aneurysm sac growth and/or rupture in a small number of patients. A prophylactic strategy of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization before EVAR has been advocated, however, the benefits of this strategy are controversial. A clinical vignette allows the authors to summarize the available data about this issue and discuss the possible benefits and risks of prophylactic IMA embolization before EVAR. The authors performed a meta-analysis of available data which showed that the pooled rate of type II endoleak after IMA embolization was 19.9% (95% CI 3.4-34.7%, I2 93%) whereas it was 41.4% (95% CI 30.4-52.3%, I2 76%) in patients without IMA embolization (5 studies including 596 patients: p < .0001, OR 0.369, 95% CI 0.22-0.61, I2 27%). Since treatment for type II endoleaks is needed in less than 20% of cases and this complication can be treated successfully in 60-70% of cases resulting in an aneurysm rupture risk of 0.9%, these data indicate that embolization of patent IMA may be of no benefit in patients undergoing EVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Biancari
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
| | - J Mäkelä
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - T Juvonen
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - M Venermo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Essentials of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair imaging: postprocedure surveillance and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203:W358-72. [PMID: 25247965 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.13.11736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lifelong postprocedural imaging surveillance is necessary after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) to assess for complications of endograft placement, as well as device failure and continued aneurysm growth. Refinement of the surveillance CT technique and development of ultrasound and MRI protocols are important to limit radiation exposure. CONCLUSION A comprehensive understanding of EVAR surveillance is necessary to identify life-threatening complications and to aid in secondary treatment planning.
Collapse
|