1
|
Abramczyk E, Nisar MU, Nguyen JK, Austin N, Ward RD, Weight C, Purysko AS. The Role of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Radioligand and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2025; 46:71-82. [PMID: 39580035 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2024.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2024]
Abstract
A significant proportion of men with prostate cancer will experience biochemical recurrence (BCR), which is characterized by an elevation in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after receiving treatment with curative intent. Imaging plays an important role in the management of patients with BCR. It can help identify sites of recurrence to determine the most appropriate management strategies, ranging from salvage treatment for local recurrences to systemic treatments for those with advanced, distant disease. PET/CT with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-radioligands is the most sensitive method for the detection of prostate cancer recurrence, with significantly higher cancer detection rates compared to conventional imaging techniques such as bone scan and computed tomography, even at lower PSA levels. Nevertheless, interpretation of PSMA PET/CT images can be challenging, particularly for the evaluation of local recurrence due to urinary activity that can mimic or mask the presence of cancer. Furthermore, some prostate cancers may not express PSMA and have false negative results. Multiparametric prostate MRI is an excellent method for the evaluation of local recurrence and can overcome some of the limitations of PSMA PET/CT. In this review, we discuss the role of imaging in managing patients with prostate cancer BCR and describe the potential benefits of MRI in the PSMA-radioligand imaging era, emphasizing the assessment of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Abramczyk
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Jane K Nguyen
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nicholas Austin
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Abdominal Imaging Section, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ryan D Ward
- Abdominal Imaging Section, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Christopher Weight
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Andrei S Purysko
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Nuclear Medicine Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Abdominal Imaging Section, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Chung C, Fuller D, Tanadini-Lang S, Jaffray DA. The Future of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:135-144. [PMID: 38105088 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) is a relatively new technology that has already shown outcomes benefits but that has not yet reached its clinical potential. The improved soft-tissue contrast provided with MR, coupled with the immediacy of image acquisition with respect to the treatment, enables expansion of on-table adaptive protocols, currently at a cost of increased treatment complexity, use of human resources, and longer treatment slot times, which translate to decreased throughput. Many approaches are being investigated to meet these challenges, including the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to accelerate and automate much of the workflow and improved technology that parallelizes workflow tasks, as well as improvements in image acquisition speed and quality. This article summarizes limitations of current available integrated MRIgRT systems and gives an outlook about scientific developments to further expand the use of MRIgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland..
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dave Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David A Jaffray
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adams ES, Deivasigamani S, Mottaghi M, Huang J, Gupta RT, Polascik TJ. Evaluation of Recurrent Disease after Radiation Therapy for Patients Considering Local Salvage Therapy: Past vs. Contemporary Management. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5883. [PMID: 38136427 PMCID: PMC10741753 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrent prostate cancer after primary treatment with radiation therapy is a common problem. Patients with localized recurrence may benefit from salvage therapy, but careful patient selection is crucial because not all patients will benefit from local salvage therapy, and salvage therapy has increased morbidity compared to primary treatments for prostate cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy and how it is continuing to evolve with increasing data on outcomes, as well as improving technologies and techniques. Our enhanced understanding of treatment outcomes and risk stratification has influenced the identification of patients who may benefit from local salvage treatment. Advances in imaging and biopsy techniques have enhanced the accuracy of locating the recurrence, which affects treatment decisions. Additionally, the growing interest in image-targeted ablative therapies that have less morbidity and complications than whole-gland therapies for suitable patients influences the evaluation process for those considering focal salvage therapy. Although significant changes have been made in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with recurrent disease after radiation therapy, it remains unclear whether these changes will ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S. Adams
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Mahdi Mottaghi
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jiaoti Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Rajan T. Gupta
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Thomas J. Polascik
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zapała P, Ślusarczyk A, Rajwa P, Gandaglia G, Zapała Ł, Zattoni F, Lorenc T, Ploussard G, Radziszewski P. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local staging before salvage radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. World J Urol 2023; 41:1275-1284. [PMID: 37019997 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04383-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a local and nodal staging tool in radio-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is still unclear. The present study aims at evaluating the predictive value of MRI in the detection of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesical invasion (SVI) and nodal involvement (LNI) in patients after primary radio (EBRT) and/or brachytherapy (BT) before salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systemically reviewed to extract the data on diagnostic performance of MRI in radio-recurrent PCa. RESULTS Four studies comprising 94 radio-recurrent PCa patients were included. The pooled prevalence of ECE, SVI, and LNI was 61%, 41%, and 20%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity for ECE, SVI and LNI detection was 53% (CI 95% 19.8-83.6%), 53% (CI 95% 37.2-68%) and 33% (CI 95% 4.7-83.1%) respectively, whereas specificity was 75% (CI 95% 40.6-92.6%), 88% (CI 95% 71.7-95.9%) and 92% (CI 95% 79.6-96.8%). The sensitivity analysis revealed that a single outlying study using only T2-weighted imaging instead of multiparametric MRI reported significantly higher sensitivity with significantly lower specificity. CONCLUSIONS This is the first meta-analysis reporting reliability of staging MRI in a radio-recurrent setting. MRI provides poor sensitivity while maintaining high specificity for local and nodal staging before SRP. However, current evidence is limited to the low number of heterogenous studies at meaningful risk of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Zapała
- Clinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Aleksander Ślusarczyk
- Clinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Łukasz Zapała
- Clinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, 35128, Padua, Italy
| | - Tomasz Lorenc
- 1St Department of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Piotr Radziszewski
- Clinic of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanmamed N, Adleman J, Berlin A, Borg J, Lao B, Weersink R, Simeonov A, Rink A, Beiki-Ardakani A, Menard C, Chung P, Helou J. Acute toxicity and health-related quality of life outcomes of localized prostate cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy: A prospective phase II trial. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:58-65. [PMID: 36414526 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report acute toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of a phase II clinical trial of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) were eligible. Treatment consisted of a single 15 Gy MRI-guided HDR-BT followed by external beam radiotherapy (37.5-46 Gy depending on their risk category). Dosimetry, toxicity and HRQoL outcomes were collected prospectively at baseline, 1 and 3 months using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 and the expanded PCa index composite, respectively. General linear mixed modeling was conducted to assess the changes in expanded PCa index composite domain scores over time. A minimally important difference was defined as a deterioration of HRQoL scores at 3 months compared to baseline ≥ 0.5 standard deviation. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Sixty-one patients were included. Acute grade (G)2 urinary toxicity was observed in 18 (30%) patients while 1 (2%) patient had G3 toxicity, and none had G4 toxicity. Two patients had an acute urinary retention. G2 gastrointestinal toxicity was reported by 5 (8%) patients with no G3-4. Compared to baseline, urinary HRQoL scores significantly declined at 1 month (p < 0.001) but recovered at 3 months (p > 0.05). Bowel (p < 0.001) and sexual (p < 0.001) domain scores showed a significant decline over the 3-month follow-up period. At 3 months, 44%, 49% and 57% of patients reported a minimally important difference respectively in the urinary bowel and sexual domains. CONCLUSION MRI-guided HDR-BT boost is a safe and well tolerated treatment of intermediate- and high-risk PCa in the acute setting. A longer follow-up and a comparison to ultrasound-based HDR-BT are needed to assess the potential benefit of MRI-guided prostate HDR-BT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia Sanmamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Investigation institute, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jenna Adleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; TECHNA Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jette Borg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bernadeth Lao
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Weersink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Simeonov
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alex Rink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Akbar Beiki-Ardakani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cynthia Menard
- TECHNA Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joelle Helou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prisciandaro J, Zoberi JE, Cohen G, Kim Y, Johnson P, Paulson E, Song W, Hwang KP, Erickson B, Beriwal S, Kirisits C, Mourtada F. AAPM Task Group Report 303 endorsed by the ABS: MRI Implementation in HDR Brachytherapy-Considerations from Simulation to Treatment. Med Phys 2022; 49:e983-e1023. [PMID: 35662032 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The Task Group (TG) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Implementation in High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy - Considerations from Simulation to Treatment, TG 303, was constituted by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's (AAPM's) Science Council under the direction of the Therapy Physics Committee, the Brachytherapy Subcommittee, and the Working Group on Brachytherapy Clinical Applications. The TG was charged with developing recommendations for commissioning, clinical implementation, and on-going quality assurance (QA). Additionally, the TG was charged with describing HDR brachytherapy (BT) workflows and evaluating practical consideration that arise when implementing MR imaging. For brevity, the report is focused on the treatment of gynecologic and prostate cancer. The TG report provides an introduction and rationale for MRI implementation in BT, a review of previous publications on topics including available applicators, clinical trials, previously published BT related TG reports, and new image guided recommendations beyond CT based practices. The report describes MRI protocols and methodologies, including recommendations for the clinical implementation and logical considerations for MR imaging for HDR BT. Given the evolution from prescriptive to risk-based QA,1 an example of a risk-based analysis using MRI-based, prostate HDR BT is presented. In summary, the TG report is intended to provide clear and comprehensive guidelines and recommendations for commissioning, clinical implementation, and QA for MRI-based HDR BT that may be utilized by the medical physics community to streamline this process. This report is endorsed by the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gil'ad Cohen
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Perry Johnson
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | | | - Ken-Pin Hwang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Sushil Beriwal
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Firas Mourtada
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Venkatesan AM, Mudairu-Dawodu E, Duran C, Stafford RJ, Yan Y, Wei W, Kundra V. Detecting recurrent prostate Cancer using multiparametric MRI, influence of PSA and Gleason grade. Cancer Imaging 2021; 21:3. [PMID: 33407861 PMCID: PMC7789281 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00373-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utility of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in detecting suspected local recurrence post radical prostatectomy (RP) may be associated with PSA and Gleason grade. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the likelihood of detecting locally recurrent prostate cancer utilizing mpMRI in patients with suspected recurrence following radical prostatectomy (RP) parsed by PSA and Gleason grade. METHODS One hundred ninety five patients with suspected local recurrence were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI with torso array and endorectal coil in this retrospective study. mpMRI interpretations were stratified by PSA and lower (Gleason < 7) vs. higher grade tumors (Gleason 8-10). Recursive partitioning was used to determine whether mpMRI interpretations could be classified as positive or negative. RESULTS The majority of mpMRI interpretations in patients with lower Gleason grade tumors and PSA < 0.5 ng/mL were negative (68/78, 87.2%, p = 0.004). The majority of mpMRI interpretations in patients with higher Gleason grade tumors and PSA > 1.5 ng/mL were positive (8/9, 88.9%, p = 0.003). Findings were corroborated by recursive partitioning, which identified a PSA = 0.5 ng/ml in patients with lower grade tumors and a PSA = 1.5 ng/mL in patients with higher grade tumors as differentiating negative and positive mpMRIs. CONCLUSION In the setting of suspected recurrence after RP, mpMRI results are associated with PSA and Gleason grade, both of which can help guide when mpMRI may find utility. mpMRI is likely to be low diagnostic yield and negative for recurrence (87%) in the setting of lower Gleason grade tumors and PSA < 0.5 ng/mL. mpMRI is likely to be of low diagnostic value and positive for recurrence (89%) in the setting of PSA > 1.5 ng/mL and higher grade tumors; in this case, mpMRI findings may be more useful for directing biopsy and local therapy. Between these extremes, PSA > 0.5 ng/mL and lower grade tumors or PSA < 1.5 ng/mL and higher grade tumors, mpMRI results are less predictable, suggesting greater diagnostic value for detecting recurrence post prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aradhana M. Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Eniola Mudairu-Dawodu
- West Houston Radiology Associates, 21216 North West Freeway, Suite 2200, Cypress, TX USA
| | - Cihan Duran
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, UT Houston, 6411 Fannin Street, Suite J2.222, Houston, TX USA
| | - R. Jason Stafford
- Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Yuanqing Yan
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Vikas Kundra
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Palumbo P, Manetta R, Izzo A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, De Filippo M, Splendiani A, Di Cesare E, Masciocchi C, Barile A. Biparametric (bp) and multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to prostate cancer disease: a narrative review of current debate on dynamic contrast enhancement. Gland Surg 2020; 9:2235-2247. [PMID: 33447576 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in male population. Over the last few years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proved to be a robust clinical tool for identification and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer. Though suggestions by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology to use complete multiparametric (mp) T2-weighted/diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)/dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) acquisition for all prostate MRI examinations, the real advantage of functional DCE remains a matter of debate. Recent studies demonstrate that biparametric (bp) and mp approaches have similar accuracy, but controversial evidences remain, and the specific potential benefits of contrast medium administration are still poorly discussed in literature. The bp approach is in fact sufficient in most cases to adequately identify a negative test, or to accurately define the degree of aggressiveness of a lesion, especially if larger or with major characteristics of malignancy. This feature would give the DCE a secondary role, probably limited to a second evaluation of the lesion location, for detecting small cancer or in case of controversy. However, DCE has proved to increase the sensitivity of prostate MRI, though a less specificity. Therefore, an appropriate decision algorithm is needed to standardize the MRI approach. Aim of this review study was to provide a schematic description of bpMRI and mpMRI approaches in the study of prostatic anatomy, focusing on comparative validity and current DCE application. Additional theoretical considerations on prostate MRI are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Rosa Manetta
- Radiology Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Izzo
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Arrigoni
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMec), Section of Radiology, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Alessandra Splendiani
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ernesto Di Cesare
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Carlo Masciocchi
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Griffin RJ, Ahmed MM, Amendola B, Belyakov O, Bentzen SM, Butterworth KT, Chang S, Coleman CN, Djonov V, Formenti SC, Glatstein E, Guha C, Kalnicki S, Le QT, Loo BW, Mahadevan A, Massaccesi M, Maxim PG, Mohiuddin M, Mohiuddin M, Mayr NA, Obcemea C, Petersson K, Regine W, Roach M, Romanelli P, Simone CB, Snider JW, Spitz DR, Vikram B, Vozenin MC, Abdel-Wahab M, Welsh J, Wu X, Limoli CL. Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate, and Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:766-778. [PMID: 32298811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute's Radiation Research Program, in collaboration with the Radiosurgery Society, hosted a workshop called Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate and Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy on August 20 and 21, 2018 to bring together experts in experimental and clinical experience in these and related fields. Critically, the overall aims were to understand the biological underpinning of these emerging techniques and the technical/physical parameters that must be further defined to drive clinical practice through innovative biologically based clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Griffin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Mansoor M Ahmed
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Oleg Belyakov
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Karl T Butterworth
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Sha Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Valentin Djonov
- Bern Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sylvia C Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Eli Glatstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Shalom Kalnicki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Health Systems, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | | | - Nina A Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - William Regine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Douglas R Spitz
- Free Radical & Radiation Biology Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | | | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology/DO/Radio-Oncology/CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- International Atomic Energy Agency Headquarters, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - James Welsh
- Edward Hines VA Medical Center and Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, Miami, Florida; Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Charles L Limoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shams R, Picot F, Grajales D, Sheehy G, Dallaire F, Birlea M, Saad F, Trudel D, Menard C, Leblond F, Kadoury S. Pre-clinical evaluation of an image-guided in-situ Raman spectroscopy navigation system for targeted prostate cancer interventions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2020; 15:867-876. [PMID: 32227280 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-020-02136-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) image guidance is the standard of care for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, but can lead to high false-negative rates, compromising downstream effectiveness of therapeutic choices. A promising approach to improve in-situ detection of PCa lies in using the optical properties of the tissue to discern cancer from healthy tissue. In this work, we present the first in-situ image-guided navigation system for a spatially tracked Raman spectroscopy probe integrated in a PCa workflow, capturing the optical tissue fingerprint. The probe is guided with fused TRUS/MR imaging and tested with both tissue-simulating phantoms and ex-vivo prostates. The workflow was designed to be integrated the clinical workflow for trans-perineal prostate biopsies, as well as for high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS The proposed system developed in 3D Slicer includes an electromagnetically tracked Raman spectroscopy probe, along with tracked TRUS imaging automatically registered to diagnostic MRI. The proposed system is tested on both custom gelatin tissue-simulating optical phantoms and biological tissue phantoms. A random-forest classifier was then trained on optical spectrums from ex-vivo prostates following prostatectomy using our optical probe. Preliminary in-human results are presented with the Raman spectroscopy instrument to detect malignant tissue in-situ with histopathology confirmation. RESULTS In 5 synthetic gelatin and biological tissue phantoms, we demonstrate the ability of the image-guided Raman system by detecting over 95% of lesions, based on biopsy samples. The included lesion volumes ranged from 0.1 to 0.61 cc. We showed the compatibility of our workflow with the current HDR brachytherapy setup. In ex-vivo prostates of PCa patients, the system showed a 81% detection accuracy in high grade lesions. CONCLUSION Pre-clinical experiments demonstrated promising results for in-situ confirmation of lesion locations in prostates using Raman spectroscopy, both in phantoms and human ex-vivo prostate tissue, which is required for integration in HDR brachytherapy procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Mirela Birlea
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dominique Trudel
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Cynthia Menard
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal Research Center, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Samuel Kadoury
- Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal Research Center, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pasquier D, Martinage G, Janoray G, Rojas DP, Zerini D, Goupy F, De Crevoisier R, Bogart E, Calais G, Toledano A, Chauveinc L, Scher N, Bondiau PY, Hannoun-Levi JM, Silva M, Meyer E, Nickers P, Lacornerie T, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Lartigau E. Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radiation Therapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the GETUG. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:727-734. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
12
|
Lee SL, Ravi A, Morton G, Loblaw A, Tseng CL, Haider M, Murgic J, Nicolae A, Semple M, Chung HT. Changes in ADC and T2-weighted MRI-derived radiomic features in patients treated with focal salvage HDR prostate brachytherapy for local recurrence after previous external-beam radiotherapy. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:567-573. [PMID: 31126856 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the changes in T2-weighted (T2w) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) magnetic resonance imaging -derived radiomic features of the gross tumor volume (GTV) from focal salvage high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRB) and to correlate with clinical parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients included those with biopsy-confirmed local recurrence that correlated with MRI (T2w, ADC). Patients received 27 Gy in 2 fractions separated by 1 week to a quadrant consisting of the GTV. The MRI was repeated 1 year after HDRB. GTVs, planning target volumes, and normal prostate tissue control volumes were identified on the pre- and post-HDRB MRIs. Radiomic features from each GTV were extracted, and principle component analysis identified features with the highest variance. RESULTS Pre- and post-HDRB MRIs were obtained from 14 trial patients. Principle component analysis showed that 18 and 17 features contributed to 93% and 86% of the variance observed in the T2w and ADC data, respectively. Sixteen T2w features and 1 ADC GTV feature were different from the control volumes in the pre-HDRB images (p < 0.05). Ten T2w and 7 ADC GTV post-HDRB features were different from those of pre-HDRB (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Exploratory analysis reveals several radiomic features in the T2w and ADC image GTVs that distinguish the GTV from healthy prostate tissue and change significantly after salvage HDRB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangjune Laurence Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Masoom Haider
- Department of Medical Imaging, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jure Murgic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandru Nicolae
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Semple
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hans T Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abiodun-Ojo OA, Akintayo AA, Akin-Akintayo OO, Tade FI, Nieh PT, Master VA, Alemozaffar M, Osunkoya AO, Goodman MM, Fei B, Schuster DM. 18F-Fluciclovine Parameters on Targeted Prostate Biopsy Associated with True Positivity in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2019; 60:1531-1536. [PMID: 30954940 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated 18F-fluciclovine uptake parameters that correlate with true positivity for local recurrence in non-prostatectomy-treated patients. Methods: Twenty-one patients (prostate-specific antigen level, 7.4 ± 6.8 ng/mL) with biochemical recurrence after nonprostatectomy local therapy (radiotherapy and cryotherapy) underwent dual-time-point 18F-fluciclovine (364.1 ± 37.7 MBq) PET/CT from pelvis to diaphragm. Prostatic uptake over background was delineated and coregistered to a prostate-biopsy-planning ultrasound. Transrectal biopsies of 18F-fluciclovine-defined targets were completed using a 3-dimensional visualization and navigation platform. Histologic analyses of lesions were completed. Lesion characteristics including SUVmax, target-to-background ratio (TBR), uptake pattern, and subjective reader's suspicion level were compared between true-positive (malignant) and false-positive (benign) lesions. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between PET and histologic findings. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were plotted to determine discriminatory cutoffs for TBR. Statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05. Results: Fifty lesions were identified in 21 patients on PET. Seventeen of 50 (34.0%) targeted lesions in 10 of 21 patients were positive for malignancy. True-positive lesions had a significantly higher SUVmax (6.62 ± 1.70 vs. 4.92 ± 1.27), marrow TBR (2.57 ± 0.81 vs. 1.69 ± 0.51), and blood-pool TBR (4.10 ± 1.17 vs. 2.99 ± 1.01) than false-positive lesions at the early time point (P < 0.01) and remained significant at the delayed time point, except for blood-pool TBR. Focal uptake (odds ratio, 12.07; 95% confidence interval, 2.98-48.80; P < 0.01) and subjective highest suspicion level (odds ratio, 10.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-99.69; P = 0.03) correlated with true positivity. Using the receiver-operating-characteristic curve, optimal cutoffs for marrow TBR were 1.9 (area under the curve, 0.82) and 1.8 (area under the curve, 0.85) at early and delayed imaging, respectively. With these cutoffs, 15 of 17 malignant lesions were identified at both time points; however, fewer false-positive lesions were detected at the delayed time point (5/33) than at the early time point (11/33). Conclusion: True positivity of 18F-fluciclovine-targeted prostate biopsy in non-prostatectomy-treated patients correlates with focal uptake, TBR (blood pool and marrow), and subjective highest suspicion level. A marrow TBR of 1.9 at the early time point and 1.8 at the delayed time point had optimal discriminating capabilities. Despite the relatively low intraprostate positive predictive value (34.0%) with 18F-fluciclovine, application of these parameters to interpretative criteria may improve true positivity in the treated prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Akinyemi A Akintayo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Oladunni O Akin-Akintayo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Funmilayo I Tade
- Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Peter T Nieh
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mehrdad Alemozaffar
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Adeboye O Osunkoya
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mark M Goodman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Emory University Center for Systems Imaging, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Baowei Fei
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.,Bioengineering, Erick Josson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas; and.,Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David M Schuster
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Calleris G, Marra G, Dalmasso E, Falcone M, Karnes RJ, Morlacco A, Oderda M, Sanchez-Salas R, Soria F, Gontero P. Is it worth to perform salvage radical prostatectomy for radio-recurrent prostate cancer? A literature review. World J Urol 2019; 37:1469-1483. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02749-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
15
|
van der Poel H, Grivas N, van Leeuwen P, Heijmink S, Schoots I. The role of MRI for detection and staging of radio- and focal therapy-recurrent prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 37:1485-1490. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02677-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
16
|
Warlick C, Futterer J, Maruf M, George AK, Rastinehad AR, Pinto PA, Bosaily AES, Villers A, Moore CM, Mendhiratta N, Taneja SS, Ukimura O, Konety BR. Beyond transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: available techniques and approaches. World J Urol 2018; 37:419-427. [PMID: 29943220 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2374-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent advances have led to the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone or with fusion to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images for guiding biopsy of the prostate. Our group sought to develop consensus recommendations regarding MRI-guided prostate biopsy based on currently available literature and expert opinion. METHODS The published literature on the subject of MRI-guided prostate biopsy was reviewed using standard search terms and synthesized and analyzed by four different subgroups from among the authors. The literature was grouped into four categories-MRI-guided biopsy platforms, robotic MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy, template mapping biopsy and transrectal MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy. Consensus recommendations were developed using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine criteria. RESULTS There is limited high level evidence available on the subject of MRI-guided prostate biopsy. MRI guidance with or without TRUS fusion can lead to fewer unnecessary biopsies, help identify high-risk (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4) cancers that might have been missed on standard TRUS biopsy and identify cancers in the anterior prostate. There is no apparent significant difference between MRI biopsy platforms. Template mapping biopsy is perhaps the most accurate method of assessing volume and grade of tumor but is accompanied by higher incidence of side effects compared to TRUS biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies are feasible and better than traditional ultrasound-guided biopsies for detecting high-risk prostate cancer and anterior lesions. Judicious use of MRI-guided biopsy could enhance diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer while limiting diagnosis of insignificant cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jurgen Futterer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mahir Maruf
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Arvin K George
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Arnauld Villers
- Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Neil Mendhiratta
- School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samir S Taneja
- School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Osamu Ukimura
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
How Advances in Imaging Will Affect Precision Radiation Oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:292-298. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
18
|
Golbari NM, Katz AE. Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 18:63. [PMID: 28688020 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0709-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW While recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) is not uncommon, there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate management after radiation treatment failure. This article seeks to explore the currently utilized modalities for salvage treatment for radiorecurrent PCa. We focused our review on the oncologic outcomes and reported toxicity rates in the latest studies examining salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), salvage cryotherapy (SCT), salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and re-irradiation. RECENT FINDINGS There does not appear to be any significant difference in overall survival for more invasive salvage radical prostatectomy compared to the minimally invasive salvage approaches. Additionally, there seems to be a trend towards lower morbidity rates associated with minimally invasive and focal salvage treatment. We are encouraged by the results presented in this review and find that there is clearly a role for emerging minimally invasive and focal therapies as durable options for salvage treatment in patients with radiorecurrent PCa.
Collapse
|
19
|
Maenhout M, van der Voort van Zyp JR, Borot de Battisti M, Peters M, van Vulpen M, van den Bosch M, Moerland MA. The effect of catheter displacement and anatomical variations on the dose distribution in MRI-guided focal HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:68-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.04.239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Revised: 04/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
20
|
Abstract
The use of prostate MR imaging in radiotherapy continues to evolve. This article describes its current application in the selection of treatment regimens, integration in treatment planning or simulation, and assessment of response. An expert consensus statement from the annual MR in RT symposium is presented, as a list of 21 key quality indicators for the practice of MR imaging simulation in prostate cancer. Although imaging requirements generally follow PIRADSv2 guidelines, additional requirements specific to radiotherapy planning are described. MR imaging-only workflows and MR imaging-guided treatment systems are expected to replace conventional computed tomography-based practice, further adding specific requirements for MR imaging in radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
21
|
Verma S, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Oto A, Tempany CM, Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB. The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2017; 285:343-356. [PMID: 29045233 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Systematic transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy is the standard approach for histopathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, this technique has multiple limitations because of its inability to accurately visualize and target prostate lesions. Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the prostate is more reliably able to localize significant prostate cancer. Targeted prostate biopsy by using MR imaging may thus help to reduce false-negative results and improve risk assessment. Several commercial devices are now available for targeted prostate biopsy, including in-gantry MR imaging-targeted biopsy and real-time transrectal US-MR imaging fusion biopsy systems. This article reviews the current status of MR imaging-targeted biopsy platforms, including technical considerations, as well as advantages and challenges of each technique. © RSNA, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadhna Verma
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.)
| | - Peter L Choyke
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.)
| | - Steven C Eberhardt
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.)
| | - Aytekin Oto
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.)
| | - Clare M Tempany
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.)
| | - Baris Turkbey
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.)
| | - Andrew B Rosenkrantz
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0761 (S.V.); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (P.L.C.); Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (S.C.E.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.M.T.); Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.T.); and Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.B.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mitcham T, Taghavi H, Long J, Wood C, Fuentes D, Stefan W, Ward J, Bouchard R. Photoacoustic-based sO 2 estimation through excised bovine prostate tissue with interstitial light delivery. PHOTOACOUSTICS 2017; 7:47-56. [PMID: 28794990 PMCID: PMC5540703 DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2017.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is capable of probing blood oxygen saturation (sO2), which has been shown to correlate with tissue hypoxia, a promising cancer biomarker. However, wavelength-dependent local fluence changes can compromise sO2 estimation accuracy in tissue. This work investigates using PA imaging with interstitial irradiation and local fluence correction to assess precision and accuracy of sO2 estimation of blood samples through ex vivo bovine prostate tissue ranging from 14% to 100% sO2. Study results for bovine blood samples at distances up to 20 mm from the irradiation source show that local fluence correction improved average sO2 estimation error from 16.8% to 3.2% and maintained an average precision of 2.3% when compared to matched CO-oximeter sO2 measurements. This work demonstrates the potential for future clinical translation of using fluence-corrected and interstitially driven PA imaging to accurately and precisely assess sO2 at depth in tissue with high resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor Mitcham
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Houra Taghavi
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - James Long
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cayla Wood
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David Fuentes
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wolfgang Stefan
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - John Ward
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Richard Bouchard
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Corresponding author at: Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Focal therapy for prostate cancer: the technical challenges. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:383-389. [PMID: 28951759 PMCID: PMC5611463 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.69809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Focal therapy for prostate cancer has been proposed as an alternative treatment to whole gland therapy, offering the opportunity for tumor dose escalation and/or reduced toxicity. Brachytherapy, either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate, provides an ideal approach, offering both precision in dose delivery and opportunity for a highly conformal, non-uniform dose distribution. Whilst multiple consensus documents have published clinical guidelines for patient selection, there are insufficient data to provide clear guidelines on target volume delineation, treatment planning margins, treatment planning approaches, and many other technical issues that should be considered before implementing a focal brachytherapy program. Without consensus guidelines, there is the potential for a diversity of practices to develop, leading to challenges in interpreting outcome data from multiple centers. This article provides an overview of the technical considerations for the implementation of a clinical service, and discusses related topics that should be considered in the design of clinical trials to ensure precise and accurate methods are applied for focal brachytherapy treatments.
Collapse
|
24
|
Brachytherapy patient safety events in an academic radiation medicine program. Brachytherapy 2017; 17:16-23. [PMID: 28757402 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the incidence and type of brachytherapy patient safety events over 10 years in an academic brachytherapy program. METHODS AND MATERIALS Brachytherapy patient safety events reported between January 2007 and August 2016 were retrieved from the incident reporting system and reclassified using the recently developed National System for Incident Reporting in Radiation Treatment taxonomy. A multi-incident analysis was conducted to identify common themes and key learning points. RESULTS During the study period, 3095 patients received 4967 brachytherapy fractions. An additional 179 patients had MR-guided prostate biopsies without treatment as part of an interventional research program. A total of 94 brachytherapy- or biopsy-related safety events (incidents, near misses, or programmatic hazards) were identified, corresponding to a rate of 2.8% of brachytherapy patients, 1.7% of brachytherapy fractions, and 3.4% of patients undergoing MR-guided prostate biopsy. Fifty-one (54%) events were classified as actual incidents, 29 (31%) as near misses, and 14 (15%) as programmatic hazards. Two events were associated with moderate acute medical harm or dosimetric severity, and two were associated with high dosimetric severity. Multi-incident analysis identified five high-risk activities or clinical scenarios as follows: (1) uncommon, low-volume or newly implemented brachytherapy procedures, (2) real-time MR-guided brachytherapy or biopsy procedures, (3) use of in-house devices or software, (4) manual data entry, and (5) patient scheduling and handoffs. CONCLUSIONS Brachytherapy is a safe treatment and associated with a low rate of patient safety events. Effective incident management is a key element of continuous quality improvement and patient safety in brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
25
|
Second salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2017; 9:161-166. [PMID: 28533806 PMCID: PMC5437080 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.67015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Salvage treatments for localized radiorecurrent prostate cancer can be performed safely when a focal and image guided approach is used. Due to the low toxicity, the opportunity exists to investigate a second salvage treatment when a second locally recurrent prostate cancer occurs. Here, we describe a second salvage treatment procedure of 4 patients. Material and methods Four patients with a pathologically proven second local recurrence were treated in an outpatient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided setting with a single fraction of 19 Gy focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). Delineation was performed using choline-PET-CT or a 68Ga-PSMA PET in combination with multiparametric 3 Tesla MRI in all four patients. Toxicity was measured using common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Results With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 6-15), there were 2 patients with biochemical recurrence as defined by the Phoenix-definition. There were no patients with grade 3 or more toxicity. In all second salvage HDR-BT treatments, the constraints for rectum, bladder, and urethra were met. Median treatment volume (GTV) was 4.8 cc (range, 1.9-6.6 cc). A median of 8 catheters (range, 6-9) were used, and the median dose to the treatment volume (GTV) was a D95: 19.3 Gy (SD 15.5-19.4 Gy). Conclusions Second focal salvage MRI-guided HDR-BT for a select group of patients with a second locally recurrent prostate cancer is feasible. There was no grade 3 or more acute toxicity for these four patients.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ménard C, Pambrun JF, Kadoury S. The utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in the operating room. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:754-760. [PMID: 28139421 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Online image guidance in the operating room using ultrasound imaging led to the resurgence of prostate brachytherapy in the 1980s. Here we describe the evolution of integrating MRI technology in the brachytherapy suite or operating room. Given the complexity, cost, and inherent safety issues associated with MRI system integration, first steps focused on the computational integration of images rather than systems. This approach has broad appeal given minimal infrastructure costs and efficiencies comparable with standard care workflows. However, many concerns remain regarding accuracy of registration through the course of a brachytherapy procedure. In selected academic institutions, MRI systems have been integrated in or near the brachytherapy suite in varied configurations to improve the precision and quality of treatments. Navigation toolsets specifically adapted to prostate brachytherapy are in development and are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ménard
- University of Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada; TECHNA Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - J-F Pambrun
- University of Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada; École polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - S Kadoury
- University of Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada; École polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tetreault-Laflamme A, Crook J. Options for Salvage of Radiation Failures for Prostate Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2017; 27:67-78. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
28
|
Hosni A, Carlone M, Rink A, Ménard C, Chung P, Berlin A. Dosimetric feasibility of ablative dose escalated focal monotherapy with MRI-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016; 122:103-108. [PMID: 27916416 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Revised: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the dosimetric feasibility of dose-escalated MRI-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) focal monotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS In all patients, GTV was defined with mpMRI, and deformably registered onto post-catheter insertion planning MRI. PTV included the GTV plus 9mm craniocaudal and 5mm in every other direction. In discovery-cohort, plans were obtained for each PTV independently aiming to deliver ⩾16.5Gy/fraction (two fraction schedule) while respecting predefined organs-at-risk (OAR) constraints or halted when achieved equivalent single-dose plan (24Gy). Dosimetric results of original and focal HDR-BT plans were evaluated to develop a planning protocol for the validation-cohort. RESULTS In discovery-cohort (20-patients, 32-GTVs): PTV D95% ⩾16.5Gy could not be reached in a single plan (3%) and was accomplished (range 16.5-23.8Gy) in 15 GTVs (47%). Single-dose schedule was feasible in 16 (50%) plans. In the validation-cohort (10-patients, 10-GTVs, two separate implants each): plans met acceptable and ideal criteria in 100% and 43-100% respectively. Migration to single-dose treatment schedule was feasible in 7 implants (35%), without relaxing OAR's constraints or increasing the dose (D100% and D35%) to mpMRI-normal prostate (p>0.05). CONCLUSION Focal ablative dose-escalated radiation is feasible with the proposed protocol. Prospective studies are warranted to determine the clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Marco Carlone
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandra Rink
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Han K, Croke J, Foltz W, Metser U, Xie J, Shek T, Driscoll B, Ménard C, Vines D, Coolens C, Simeonov A, Beiki-Ardakani A, Leung E, Levin W, Fyles A, Milosevic MF. A prospective study of DWI, DCE-MRI and FDG PET imaging for target delineation in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016; 120:519-525. [PMID: 27528120 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We examined the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), and FDG-PET imaging for brachytherapy target delineation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-two patients had DWI, DCE-MRI, and FDG-PET/CT scans after brachytherapy applicator insertion, in addition to standard T2-weighted (T2w) 3T MRI. Gross tumor volume (GTVB) and high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) were contoured first on T2w images, and then modified if indicated upon review of DWI/DCE-MRI/FDG-PET images by two observers. The primary endpoint was utility, determined by the number of patients whose volumes were modified, and interobserver variability. RESULTS Eleven patients' T2w-GTVB were modified based on DWI/DCE-MRI/FDG-PET by observer 1, due to clearer demarcation (7) and residual disease not well visualized on T2w MRI (4). GTVB was modified in 17 patients by observer 2 (11 and 6, respectively). Incorporation of functional imaging improved the conformity index (CI) for GTVB from 0.54 (T2w alone) to 0.65 (P=0.003). HRCTV was modified in 3 and 8 patients by observers 1 and 2, respectively, with a trend toward higher CI using functional imaging (0.71 to 0.76, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS DWI/DCE-MRI/FDG-PET imaging as a supplement to T2w MRI decreased interobserver variability in GTVB delineation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Han
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Croke
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Warren Foltz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jason Xie
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tina Shek
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brandon Driscoll
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Doug Vines
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Catherine Coolens
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Simeonov
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Akbar Beiki-Ardakani
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Leung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Wilfred Levin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Anthony Fyles
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael F Milosevic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Turkbey B, Brown AM, Sankineni S, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke PL. Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:326-36. [PMID: 26594835 PMCID: PMC7511979 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging has traditionally played a minor role in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. However, recent controversies generated by the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening followed by random biopsy have encouraged the development of new imaging methods for prostate cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as the imaging method best able to detect clinically significant prostate cancers and to guide biopsies. Here, the authors explain what mpMRI is and how it is used clinically, especially with regard to high-risk populations, and we discuss the impact of mpMRI on treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:326-336. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baris Turkbey
- Staff Clinician, Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Anna M. Brown
- Fellow, Medical Research Scholars Program, Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sandeep Sankineni
- Fellow, Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Bradford J. Wood
- Director, National Institutes of Health Center for Interventional Oncology; and Chief, Interventional Radiology Section, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter A. Pinto
- Head, Prostate Cancer Section, Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Peter L. Choyke
- Program Director, Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Focal salvage therapy for local prostate cancer recurrences after primary radiotherapy: a comprehensive review. World J Urol 2016; 34:1521-1531. [PMID: 27012712 PMCID: PMC5063906 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1811-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2015] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aim Patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy can be eligible for salvage treatment. Whole-gland salvage techniques carry a high risk of toxicity. A focal salvage approach might reduce the risk of adverse events while maintaining cancer control in carefully selected patients. The aim of this review was to evaluate current literature to assess whether focal salvage leads to a comparable or favourable recurrence rate and less toxicity compared to whole-gland salvage. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. A total of 3015 articles were screened and assessed for quality. Eight papers [on focal cryoablation (n = 3), brachytherapy (n = 3) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (n = 2)] were used to report outcomes. Results One-, 2-, 3- and 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) ranges for focal salvage are, respectively, 69–100, 49–100, 50–91 and 46.5–54.5 %. Severe genitourinary, gastrointestinal and sexual function toxicity rates are 0–33.3 %. One study directly compares focal to whole-gland salvage cryotherapy, showing 5-year BDFS of, respectively, 54.4 and 86.5 % with lower toxicity rates for focal salvage patients. Conclusion Provisional data suggest that BDFS rates of focal salvage are in line with those of whole-gland approaches. There is evidence that focal salvage could decrease severe toxicity and preserve erectile function. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1811-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
32
|
Peters M, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Moerland MA, Hoekstra CJ, van de Pol S, Westendorp H, Maenhout M, Kattevilder R, Verkooijen HM, van Rossum PSN, Ahmed HU, Shah TT, Emberton M, van Vulpen M. Development and internal validation of a multivariable prediction model for biochemical failure after whole-gland salvage iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:296-305. [PMID: 26948662 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2015] [Revised: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 01/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Localized recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy can be curatively treated using salvage iodine-125 ((125)I) brachytherapy. Selection is hampered by a lack of predictive factors for cancer control. This study aims to develop and internally validate a prognostic model for biochemical failure (BF) after salvage (125)I brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Whole-gland salvage (125)I brachytherapy patients were treated between 1993 and 2010 in two radiotherapy centers in the Netherlands. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to assess the predictive value of clinical parameters related to BF (Phoenix-definition [prostate-specific antigen [PSA]-nadir + 2.0 ng/mL]). Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. The model's discriminatory ability was assessed with Harrell's C-statistic. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling (2000 data sets). Goodness-of-fit was evaluated with calibration plots. All analyses were performed using the recently published TRIPOD (Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) statement. RESULTS After median followup of 74 months (range 5-138), 43 of a total 62 patients developed BF. In multivariable analysis, disease-free survival interval (DFSI) after primary therapy and pre-salvage prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) were predictors of BF: corrected hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.97-0.999; p = 0.04) and 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.99; p = 0.03), both for a 1-month increase (optimism-adjusted C-statistic 0.70). Calibration was accurate up to 36 months. Of patients with PSADT >30 months and DFSI >60 months, 36-month biochemical disease-free survival was >75%. Every 12-month increase in DFSI will allow 3-month decrease in PSADT while maintaining the same biochemical recurrence-free rates. CONCLUSIONS We have presented results from a cohort of patients undergoing salvage (125)I-brachytherapy. Our data show that better selection of patients is possible with the DFSI and PSADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - M A Moerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C J Hoekstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - S van de Pol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - H Westendorp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - M Maenhout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Kattevilder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute RISO, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, National Health Service (UCLH NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, National Health Service (UCLH NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, National Health Service (UCLH NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH/UCL) Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - M van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Murgic J, Chung P, Berlin A, Bayley A, Warde P, Catton C, Simeonov A, Abed J, O'Leary G, Rink A, Ménard C. Lessons learned using an MRI-only workflow during high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:147-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Revised: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
34
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review discusses the feasibility, recent advances and current status of in-bore MRI-guided interventional techniques for diagnosis and treatment of focal prostate cancer (PCa) and also explores the future applications, highlighting the emerging strategies for the treatment of PCa. RECENT FINDINGS Multiparametric MRI has opened up opportunities for diagnosis and targeted therapeutics to the site of disease within the organ wherein minimizing the incidence of treatment-related toxicity of whole gland therapy. MRI-guided targeted biopsy has a higher detection rate for significant cancer and lower rate of detection of insignificant cancer. In comparison to ultrasound-guided focal therapy, in-bore treatment provides the advantage of real time thermal monitoring during treatment and assessment of treatment coverage by an enhanced scan immediately post-treatment. Preliminary results of ongoing phase I and II in-bore focal PCa treatment trials via transperineal, transrectal and transurethral routes, using different energy modalities for the ablation, have shown promising results. SUMMARY Advances in multiparametric-MRI has opened up opportunities for in-bore targeted focal treatment of PCa in the correctly selected patient.
Collapse
|
35
|
Peters M, van der Voort van Zyp JRN, Moerland MA, Hoekstra CJ, van de Pol S, Westendorp H, Maenhout M, Kattevilder R, Verkooijen HM, van Rossum PSN, Ahmed HU, Shah TT, Emberton M, van Vulpen M. Multivariable model development and internal validation for prostate cancer specific survival and overall survival after whole-gland salvage Iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 2016; 119:104-10. [PMID: 26897512 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Revised: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-gland salvage Iodine-125-brachytherapy is a potentially curative treatment strategy for localised prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences after radiotherapy. Prognostic factors influencing PCa-specific and overall survival (PCaSS & OS) are not known. The objective of this study was to develop a multivariable, internally validated prognostic model for survival after whole-gland salvage I-125-brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Whole-gland salvage I-125-brachytherapy patients treated in the Netherlands from 1993-2010 were included. Eligible patients had a transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy-confirmed localised recurrence after biochemical failure (clinical judgement, ASTRO or Phoenix-definition). Recurrences were assessed clinically and with CT and/or MRI. Metastases were excluded using CT/MRI and technetium-99m scintigraphy. Multivariable Cox-regression was used to assess the predictive value of clinical characteristics in relation to PCa-specific and overall mortality. PCa-specific mortality was defined as patients dying with distant metastases present. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation (20 imputed sets). Internal validation was performed and the C-statistic calculated. Calibration plots were created to visually assess the goodness-of-fit of the final model. Optimism-corrected survival proportions were calculated. All analyses were performed according to the TRIPOD statement. RESULTS Median total follow-up was 78months (range 5-139). A total of 62 patients were treated, of which 28 (45%) died from PCa after mean (±SD) 82 (±36) months. Overall, 36 patients (58%) patients died after mean 84 (±40) months. PSA doubling time (PSADT) remained a predictive factor for both types of mortality (PCa-specific and overall): corrected hazard ratio's (HR's) 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98, p=0.02) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99, p=0.01), respectively (C-statistics 0.71 and 0.69, respectively). Calibration was accurate up to 96month follow-up. Over 80% of patients can survive 8years if PSADT>24months (PCaSS) and >33months (OS). Only approximately 50% survival is achieved with a PSADT of 12months. CONCLUSION A PSADT of respectively >24months and >33months can result in >80% probability of PCa- specific and overall survival 8years after whole-gland salvage I-125-brachytherapy. Survival should be weighed against toxicity from a salvage procedure. Larger series and external validation are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Marinus A Moerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Metha Maenhout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter S N van Rossum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Department of Urology, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, UK; NIHR UCLH/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Marco van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Foltz WD, Porter DA, Simeonov A, Aleong A, Jaffray D, Chung P, Han K, Ménard C. Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging improves geometric performance for image-guided radiation therapy of pelvic tumors. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:525-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2014] [Revised: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 07/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
37
|
Jaffray DA, Chung C, Coolens C, Foltz W, Keller H, Menard C, Milosevic M, Publicover J, Yeung I. Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: An Emerging Science and Clinical Service. Semin Radiat Oncol 2015; 25:292-304. [PMID: 26384277 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Radiation oncology has long required quantitative imaging approaches for the safe and effective delivery of radiation therapy. The past 10 years has seen a remarkable expansion in the variety of novel imaging signals and analyses that are starting to contribute to the prescription and design of the radiation treatment plan. These include a rapid increase in the use of magnetic resonance imaging, development of contrast-enhanced imaging techniques, integration of fluorinated deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, evaluation of hypoxia imaging techniques, and numerous others. These are reviewed with an effort to highlight challenges related to quantification and reproducibility. In addition, several of the emerging applications of these imaging approaches are also highlighted. Finally, the growing community of support for establishing quantitative imaging approaches as we move toward clinical evaluation is summarized and the need for a clinical service in support of the clinical science and delivery of care is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Anthony Jaffray
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; TECHNA Institute/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Caroline Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Coolens
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; TECHNA Institute/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Warren Foltz
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; TECHNA Institute/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harald Keller
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; TECHNA Institute/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia Menard
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; TECHNA Institute/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Milosevic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Publicover
- TECHNA Institute/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ivan Yeung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; TECHNA Institute/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lim C, Malone SC, Avruch L, Breau RH, Flood TA, Lim M, Morash C, Quon JS, Walsh C, Schieda N. Pictorial review. Magnetic resonance for radiotherapy management and treatment planning in prostatic carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20150507. [PMID: 26279086 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI has an important role for radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning in prostate cancer (PCa) providing accurate visualization of the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) and locoregional anatomy, assessment of local staging and depiction of implanted devices. MRI enables the radiation oncologist to optimize RT planning by better defining target tumour volumes (thereby increasing local tumour control), as well as decreasing morbidity (by minimizing the dose to adjacent normal structures). Using MRI, radiation oncologists can define the DIL for delivery of boost doses of RT using a variety of techniques including: stereotactic body radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton RT or brachytherapy to improve tumour control. Radiologists require a familiarity with the different RT methods used to treat PCa, as well as an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of the various MR pulse sequences available for RT planning in order to provide an optimal multidisciplinary RT treatment approach to PCa. Understanding the expected post-RT appearance of the prostate and typical characteristics of local tumour recurrence is also important because MRI is rapidly becoming an integral component for diagnosis, image-guided histological sampling and treatment planning in the setting of biochemical failure after RT or surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Lim
- 1 Department of Medical Imaging The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shawn C Malone
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Leonard Avruch
- 1 Department of Medical Imaging The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- 3 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Trevor A Flood
- 4 Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Megan Lim
- 5 Faculty of Medicine, The University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Christopher Morash
- 3 Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeff S Quon
- 1 Department of Medical Imaging The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Cynthia Walsh
- 1 Department of Medical Imaging The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicola Schieda
- 1 Department of Medical Imaging The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Morigi JJ, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ, Tang R, Ho B, Nguyen Q, Hruby G, Fogarty G, Jagavkar R, Kneebone A, Hickey A, Fanti S, Tarlinton L, Emmett L. Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy. J Nucl Med 2015; 56:1185-90. [PMID: 26112024 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 439] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED In prostate cancer with biochemical failure after therapy, current imaging techniques have a low detection rate at the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at which targeted salvage therapy is effective. (11)C-choline and (18)F-fluoromethylcholine, though widely used, have poor sensitivity at low PSA levels. (68)Ga-PSMA (Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-[(68)Ga-N,N'-bis[2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid]) has shown promising results in retrospective trials. Our aim was to prospectively compare the detection rates of (68)Ga-PSMA versus (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in men who were initially managed with radical prostatectomy, radiation treatment, or both and were being considered for targeted therapy. METHODS A sample of men with a rising PSA level after treatment, eligible for targeted treatment, was prospectively included. Patients on systemic treatment were excluded. (68)Ga-PSMA, (18)F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT, and diagnostic CT were performed sequentially on all patients between January and April 2015, and the images were assessed by masked, experienced interpreters. The findings and their impact on management were documented, together with the results of histologic follow-up when feasible. RESULTS In total, 38 patients were enrolled. Of these, 34 (89%) had undergone radical prostatectomy and 4 (11%) had undergone radiation treatment. Twelve (32%) had undergone salvage radiation treatment after primary radical prostatectomy. The mean PSA level was 1.74 ± 2.54 ng/mL. The scan results were positive in 26 patients (68%) and negative with both tracers in 12 patients (32%). Of the 26 positive scans, 14 (54%) were positive with (68)Ga-PSMA alone, 11 (42%) with both (18)F-fluoromethylcholine and (68)Ga-PSMA, and only 1 (4%) with (18)F-fluoromethylcholine alone. When PSA was below 0.5 ng/mL, the detection rate was 50% for (68)Ga-PSMA versus 12.5% for (18)F-fluoromethylcholine. When PSA was 0.5-2.0 ng/mL, the detection rate was 69% for (68)Ga-PSMA versus 31% for (18)F-fluoromethylcholine, and when PSA was above 2.0, the detection rate was 86% for (68)Ga-PSMA versus 57% for (18)F-fluoromethylcholine. On lesion-based analysis, (68)Ga-PSMA detected more lesions than (18)F-fluoromethylcholine (59 vs. 29, P < 0.001). The tumor-to-background ratio in positive scans was higher for (68)Ga-PSMA than for (18)F-fluoromethylcholine (28.6 for (68)Ga-PSMA vs. 9.4 for (18)F-fluoromethylcholine, P < 0.001). There was a 63% (24/38 patients) management impact, with 54% (13/24 patients) being due to (68)Ga-PSMA imaging alone. Histologic follow-up was available for 9 of 38 patients (24%), and 9 of 9 (68)Ga-PSMA-positive lesions were consistent with prostate cancer ((68)Ga-PSMA was true-positive). The lesion positive on (18)F-fluoromethylcholine imaging and negative on (68)Ga-PSMA imaging was shown at biopsy to be a false-positive (18)F-fluoromethylcholine finding ((68)Ga-PSMA was true-negative). CONCLUSION In patients with biochemical failure and a low PSA level, (68)Ga-PSMA demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate than (18)F-fluoromethylcholine and a high overall impact on management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Morigi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia Nuclear Medicine Operative Unit, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, Australia Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research/Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, Australia Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research/Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Reuben Tang
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
| | - Bao Ho
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Quoc Nguyen
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, Australia Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research/Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Hruby
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gerald Fogarty
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, Australia
| | - Raj Jagavkar
- St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Adam Hickey
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Operative Unit, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lisa Tarlinton
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Vincent's Public Hospital, Sydney, Australia University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhang F, Bai Z, Shi Y, Wang J, Li Y, Yang X. Interventional MRI-guided local delivery of agents into swine bile duct walls using MR-compatible needle-integrated balloon catheter system. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2015; 28:679-684. [PMID: 25900480 PMCID: PMC4441522 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Revised: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of interventional MRI-guided local agent delivery into pig common bile duct (CBD) walls using a newly designed MR-compatible, needle-integrated balloon catheter system. We first designed a needle-integrated balloon catheter system that comprised of a 22 G MR-compatible Chiba biopsy needle and a conventional 12 mm × 2 cm balloon catheter. Under fluoroscopy guidance, a custom needle-balloon system was positioned in the target CBD via a transcholecystic access. T1-weighted MRI was used to localize and reposition the needle-balloon system in the target. A 0.5 mL mixture of motexafin gadolinium (MGd) and trypan blue dye as well as 5-fluorouracil was delivered into the CBD wall through the needle-balloon system. Post-infusion T1-weighted MRI was obtained and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of CBD walls of pre- and post-MGd-blue infusions were compared by a paired t-test. In addition, post-infusion x-ray cholangiography was achieved to evaluate the potential injuries of CBDs by the needle-balloon system. Subsequent histologic analysis was performed to correlate and confirm the imaging findings. A post-infusion cholangiogram did not show any extravasation of contrast agent, indicating no procedure-related damage to the CBDs. MRI demonstrated clear enhancement of the target bile duct walls infused with MGd-trypan blue dye with average penetration depth of 4.7 ± 1.2 mm and an average MGd perfusion length of 21 ± 1.5 mm in the bile ducts and their surrounding tissues. The average CNR of the post-infusion bile ducts was significant higher than that of the pre-infusion bile ducts (110.6 ± 22 versus 5.7 ± 2.8, p < 0.0001). Histology depicted the blue dye staining and red fluorescence of MGd through the target CBD walls, which was well correlated with the imaging findings. It is feasible to use the new MR-compatible, needle-integrated balloon catheter system for intrabiliary local agent delivery into CBD walls under MRI guidance, which may open new avenues for efficient management of pancreatobiliary malignancies using MR-guided interventional oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Xiaoming Yang
- Correspondence to: Xiaoming Yang, MD, PhD, Image-Guided Bio-Molecular Intervention Section, Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 850 Republican Street, S470, Seattle, Washington, USA., Phone: 206-685-6967, Fax: 206-221-0647,
| |
Collapse
|