SSR white paper: guidelines for utilization and performance of direct MR arthrography

OBJECTIVE

Direct magnetic resonance arthrography (dMRA) is often considered the most accurate imaging modality for the evaluation of intra-articular structures, but utilization and performance vary widely without consensus. The purpose of this white paper is to develop consensus recommendations on behalf of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) based on published literature and expert opinion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Standards and Guidelines Committee of the SSR identified guidelines for utilization and performance of dMRA as an important topic for study and invited all SSR members with expertise and interest to volunteer for the white paper panel. This panel was tasked with determining an outline, reviewing the relevant literature, preparing a written document summarizing the issues and controversies, and providing recommendations.

RESULTS

Twelve SSR members with expertise in dMRA formed the ad hoc white paper authorship committee. The published literature on dMRA was reviewed and summarized, focusing on clinical indications, technical considerations, safety, imaging protocols, complications, controversies, and gaps in knowledge. Recommendations for the utilization and performance of dMRA in the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle/foot regions were developed in group consensus.

CONCLUSION

Although direct MR arthrography has been previously used for a wide variety of clinical indications, the authorship panel recommends more selective application of this minimally invasive procedure. At present, direct MR arthrography remains an important procedure in the armamentarium of the musculoskeletal radiologist and is especially valuable when conventional MRI is indeterminant or results are discrepant with clinical evaluation.

Does Direct MRI Tenography Improve the Diagnostic Performance of Low-Field MRI to Identify Artificially Created Soft-Tissue Lesions within the Equine Cadaveric Digital Flexor Tendon Sheath?

Tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) is diagnosed using ultrasonography and contrast tenography. Nevertheless, making a precise preoperative diagnosis is challenging. This study aimed to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of low-field MRI and MRI tenography (MRIt) to detect artificially created soft-tissue lesions in the DFTS. In 21 DFTSs, 118 lesions were made tenoscopically in the superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT), deep digital flexor tendon (DDFT), manica flexoria (MF) and proximal scutum. MRI and MRI, following intrathecal gadolinium administration (MRIt), were performed. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI and MRIt were calculated and compared. Proximal scutum lesions were less frequently identified by MRI (Sensitivity 38%, specificity 96%) compared to MRIt (Sensitivity: 50%, p = 0.80; specificity: 96%, p = 1). This was similar for SDFT lesions (Sensitivity: 39% versus 54%, p = 0.72; specificity: 93% versus 96%, p = 1). MRI detected DDFT lesions (sensitivity 34%; specificity 100%) better than MRIt (sensitivity 32%, p = 0.77; specificity 98%, p = 1). This was similar for MF lesions (MRI sensitivity 61%; specificity 100% vs. MRIt sensitivity 50%, p = 0.68; specificity 96%, p = 1). Lesion size was significantly associated with MRI or MRIt diagnosis (p = 0.001). The intrathecal administration of gadolinium did not significantly improve the ability of low-field MRI to diagnose artificial DFTS tendon lesions. Small lesion length was a significant discriminating factor for lesion detection. MRI and MRIt specificity were high, thus being helpful in diagnosing an intact structure.

Impact of concentration and dilution of three macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents on MRI signal intensity at 1.5T and 3T and different pulse sequences: results of a phantom study in human plasma

BACKGROUND

Many factors influence the increase in signal intensity (SI) provided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast media.

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of different gadolinium concentrations and dilutions of three macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) on SI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This phantom study investigated gadobutrol, gadoteridol, and gadoterate in human plasma of a healthy donor pool at 37 °C. Different molar concentrations served to mimic conditions typically relevant for steady-state imaging; different dilutions served to mimic influence on first-pass bolus imaging. For SI measurement at 1.5T and 3T, we used two Magnetom Scanners (Siemens), applying the T1-weighted sequences Flash 2D/3D and VIBE. Regions of interest were placed on the central slice of the test vials.

RESULTS

In the concentration series, gadobutrol showed the highest SI of all three GBCAs up to 2 mM, followed by gadoteridol and gadoterate. No major differences were seen between 1.5T and 3T. In the dilution series, gadobutrol showed the highest SI of all three GBCAs up to 10 mL/L. The highest effect was recorded with Flash 3D and VIBE at 3T.

CONCLUSION

SIs measured in phantoms using three macrocyclic GBCAs strongly depend on their relaxivity and on the local concentration. The latter can be influenced-when comparing dilutions-by their initial concentration in their formulation. Furthermore, the pulse sequences and the chosen parameters have essential influence. At steady-state concentrations (≤2 mM) and first-pass bolus dilutions (up to 10 ml/L), gadobutrol showed highest SIs, followed by gadoterate and gadoteridol.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee

Knee pain is frequently seen in patients of all ages, with a wide range of possible aetiologies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is a common diagnostic examination performed for detecting and characterising acute and chronic internal derangement injuries of the knee and helps guide patient management. This article reviews the current clinical practice of MRI evaluation and interpretation of meniscal, ligamentous, cartilaginous, and synovial disorders within the knee that are commonly encountered.

Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography (MR-HSG) is a promising technique in the work-up of female infertility. Few existing MR-HSG studies focus on the comparison between MR-HSG with gold standard examination.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic value of MR-HSG with conventional HSG in patients receiving both exams in one day.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 33 infertile women who completed pelvic MR scanning, HSG, and MR-HSG in that order. A traditional HSG contrast agent (iohexol) and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent (1 mL gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) blended with 100 mL iohexol) were used to achieve image enhancement. Inter-observer and inter-modality agreements of HSG and MR-HSG exams were assessed. The results were calculated by using the kappa test. Three radiologists who were blinded to the clinical data independently reviewed the MR images. Extratubal abnormalities were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 62 fallopian tubes of 33 women were included in the study. MR-HSG imaging findings to depict tubal patency were similar to these of HSG (AUC 0.911, sensitivity 0.821, specificity 1.000, positive predictive values 1.000, and negative predictive values 0.872). Pairwise inter-observer agreement among three observers and inter-modality agreement of the diagnosis were excellent (mean kappa 0.863 and 0.835, respectively). In addition, 29 extratubal abnormalities in 21 patients were found on pelvic MR scanning.

CONCLUSION

MR-HSG and HSG demonstrated similar results in assessing tubal patency. Because it offers the comprehensive assessment of female pelvic structures, and avoids ionizing radiation, MR-HSG may be used as an alternative imaging technique for evaluation of female infertility.

Gadolinium deposition and the potential for toxicological sequelae - A literature review of issues surrounding gadolinium-based contrast agents

Every year, approximately 30 million magnetic resonance imaging scans are enhanced with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) worldwide. Although the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal impairment is well-documented, over recent years it has become apparent that exposure to GBCAs can potentially result in gadolinium deposition within human bone and brain tissue even in the presence of normal renal function. This review will address some of the controversies surrounding the safety of GBCA administration based on evidence from in vivo experiments, animal studies and clinical studies. We additionally evaluate the potential risk of toxicity from exposure to gadolinium in light of new guidance published by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, and discuss whether gadolinium deposition disease exists as a new diagnosis.

Diagnostic performance of shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography for labral tears having surgery as reference: comparison of high-resolution isotropic 3D sequence (THRIVE) with standard protocol

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (THRIVE) sequence with that of a standard protocol for direct shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) for the diagnosis of superior labral anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) and Bankart lesions, using arthroscopy findings as a reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 84 patients who underwent direct shoulder 3T MRA using THRIVE and two-dimensional three-plane proton-density fat-suppressed (2D-PD-FS) sequences. One reviewer evaluated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a quantitative image quality. Other two reviewers independently evaluated the subjective image noise, image sharpness, and radiologic diagnosis as qualitative image quality. Arthroscopic surgical findings were considered the reference standard. Wilcoxon rank sum, Chi-square/Fisher's exact, and DeLong's tests, as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate differences between THRIVE and 2D-PD-FS images.

RESULTS

THRIVE images had significantly higher CNR (p < 0.001), and subjective ratings of image noise (p = 0.009) and sharpness (p = 0.039) than 2D-PD-FS images (p < 0.001). THRIVE images had similar (p ≥ 0.18) diagnostic performance (sensitivity, 93.0-97.2%; specificity, 95.8-100%; accuracy, 95.2-97.6%) for the diagnosis of SLAP and Bankart lesions with excellent agreement (ICC = 0.898-0.942) when compared to 2D-PD-FS images (sensitivity, 86.1-91.7%; specificity, 93.8-95.8%; accuracy, 90.5-92.9%; agreement, ICC = 0.782-0.858). The scan time was reduced by 69% for THRIVE sequence compared to 2D-PD-FS sequence (2 min 40 s vs. 8 min 40 s).

CONCLUSION

The THRIVE sequence may be helpful in the diagnosis of SLAP and Bankart lesions, and may be routinely used during direct shoulder 3T MRA.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: An overview and update of conventional and state of the art imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the preferred modality for imaging the knee to show pathology and guide patient management and treatment. The knee is one of the most frequently injured joints, and knee pain is a pervasive difficulty that can affect all age groups. Due to the diverse pathology, complex anatomy, and a myriad of injury mechanisms of the knee, the MRI knee protocol and sequences should ensure detection of both soft tissue and osseous structures in detail and with accuracy. The knowledge of knee anatomy and the normal or injured MRI appearance of these key structures are critical for precise diagnosis. Advances in MRI technology provide the imaging necessary to obtain high-resolution images to evaluate menisci, ligaments, and tendons. Furthermore, recent advances in MRI techniques allow for improved imaging in the postoperative knee and metal artifact reduction, tumor imaging, cartilage evaluation, and visualization of nerves. As treatment and operative management techniques evolve, understanding the correct application of these advancements in MRI of the knee will prove to be valuable to clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;45:1257-1275.

Comparison of tissue distribution, phrenic nerve involvement, and epidural spread in standard- vs low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene plexus block using contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound guidance allows for the use of much lower volumes of local anaesthetics for nerve blocks, which may be associated with less aberrant spread and fewer complications. This randomized, controlled study used contrast magnetic resonance imaging to view the differential-volume local anaesthetic distribution, and compared analgesic efficacy and respiratory impairment.

METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing shoulder surgery were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided interscalene block by a single, blinded operator with injection of ropivacaine 0.75% (either 20 or 5 ml) plus the contrast dye gadopentetate dimeglumine, followed by magnetic resonance imaging. The primary outcome was epidural spread. Secondary outcomes were central non-epidural spread, contralateral epidural spread, spread to the phrenic nerve, spirometry, ultrasound investigation of the diaphragm, block duration, pain scores during the first 24 h, time to first analgesic consumption, and total analgesic consumption.

RESULTS

All blocks provided fast onset and adequate intra- and postoperative analgesia, with no significant differences in pain scores at any time point. Epidural spread occurred in two subjects of each group (13.3%); however, spread to the intervertebral foramen and phrenic nerve and extensive i.m. local anaesthetic deposition were significantly more frequent in the 20 ml group. Diaphragmatic paralysis occurred twice as frequently (n=8 vs 4), and changes from baseline peak respiratory flow rate were larger [Δ=-2.66 (1.99 sd) vs -1.69 (2.0 sd) l min(-1)] in the 20 ml group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that interscalene block is associated with epidural spread irrespective of injection volume; however, less central (foraminal) and aberrant spread after low-volume injection may be associated with a more favourable risk profile.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the European Medicines Agency (Eudra-CT number 2013-004219-36) and with the US National Institutes' of Health registry and results base, clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT02175069).

Prospective Evaluation of Agreement and Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears: MR Arthrography a Short Time After Injection Versus CT Arthrography After a Moderate Delay

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of direct CT arthrography performed after a moderate injection delay with that of MR arthrography performed soon after injection in the diagnosis of meniscal tears.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent direct MR arthrography followed by same-day CT arthrography of the knee. Two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed the MR and CT arthrographic images for the presence of medial or lateral meniscal tears in the anterior horn, body, and posterior horn. Their readings were compared with a reference standard reading, which was based on post-MRI arthroscopic findings (n = 11) or the consensus opinion of two other musculoskeletal radiologists who simultaneously reviewed the paired CT and MR arthrographic examinations using all available clinical, surgical, and imaging information. The individual and combined radiologist agreements with the reference standard were calculated for each modality.

RESULTS

Interreader agreement was 91% for MR arthrography and 85% for CT arthrography. The overall combined radiologist agreement with the reference standard was 91% for MR arthrography and 86% for CT arthrography (p = 0.03). For the two readers, the overall accuracy rates for diagnosing a meniscal tear were 82% and 88% with MR arthrography and 74% and 76% with CT arthrography. Only 50% (3/6) of surgically proven tears imbibed gadolinium.

CONCLUSION

Although MR arthrography performed soon after the contrast injection had higher interreader agreement and greater accuracy, CT arthrography performed after a mean postinjection delay of 100 minutes was moderately accurate in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and can be used as an alternative procedure when MR arthrography cannot be completed.

Ultrasound guidance to perform intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based contrast material for magnetic resonance arthrography as an alternative to fluoroscopy: the time is now

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been definitively established as the reference standard in the evaluation of joints in the body. Similarly, magnetic resonance arthrography has emerged as a technique that has been proven to increase significantly the diagnostic performance if compared with conventional MR imaging, especially when dealing with fibrocartilage and articular cartilage abnormalities. Diluted gadolinium can be injected in the joint space using different approaches: under palpation using anatomic landmarks or using an imaging guidance, such as fluoroscopy, computed tomography, or ultrasound. Fluoroscopy has been traditionally used, but the involvement of ionizing radiation should represent a remarkable limitation of this modality. Conversely, ultrasound has emerged as a feasible, cheap, quick, and radiation-free modality that can be used to inject joints, with comparable accuracy of fluoroscopy. In the present paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using fluoroscopy or ultrasound in injecting gadolinium-based contrast agents in joints to perform magnetic resonance arthrography, also in view of the new EuroSAFE Imaging initiative promoted by the European Society of Radiology and the recent updates to the European Atomic Energy Community 2013/59 directive on the medical use of ionizing radiation.

KEY POINTS

• Intra-articular contrast agent injection can be performed using different imaging modalities • Fluoroscopy is widely used, but uses ionizing radiation • Ultrasound is an accurate, quick, and radiation-free modality for joint injection • X-rays should be avoided when other radiation-free modalities can be used.