Impact of radiation dose on the detection of interstitial lung changes and image quality in low-dose chest CT - Assessment in multiple dose levels from a single patient scan

PURPOSE

To assess image quality and detectability of interstitial lung changes using multiple radiation doses from the same chest CT scan of patients with suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD).

METHOD

Retrospective study of consecutive adult patients with suspected ILD receiving unenhanced chest CT as single-energy dual-source acquisition at 100 kVp (Dual-split mode). 67% and 33% of the overall tube current time product were assigned to tube A and B, respectively. 100%-dose was 2.34 ± 0.97 mGy. Five different radiation doses (100%, 67%, 45%, 39%, 33%) were reconstructed from this single acquisition using linear-blending technique. Two blinded radiologists assessed reticulations, ground-glass opacities (GGO) and honeycombing as well as subjective image noise. Percentage agreement (PA) as compared to 100%-dose were calculated. Non-parametric statistical tests were used.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients were included (61.2 ± 14.6 years,146 female). PA was highest for honeycombing (>96%) and independent of dose reduction (P > 0.8). PA for reticulations and GGO decreased when reducing the radiation dose from 100% to 67% for both readers (reticulations: 83.3% and 93.9%; GGO: 87.7% and 79.8% for reader 1 and 2, respectively). Additional dose reduction did not significantly change PA for both readers (all P > 0.05). Subjective image noise increased with decreasing radiation dose (Spearman Rho of ρ = 0.34 and ρ = 0.53 for reader 1 and 2, respectively, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation dose reduction had a stronger impact on subtle interstitial lung changes. Detectability decreased with initial dose reduction indicating that a minimum dose is needed to maintain diagnostic accuracy in chest CT for suspected ILD.

Comparison of submillisievert CT with standard-dose CT for urolithiasis

BACKGROUND

Patients with renal stones receive multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations. We investigated whether submillisievert (sub-mSv) CT for stone detection could reduce radiation dose at exposure levels comparable to kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) radiography.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the radiation dose exposure, diagnostic performance, and image quality of sub-mSv non-contrast CT using advanced modelled iterative reconstruction algorithm with spectral filtration for the detection of urolithiasis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 145 consecutive patients underwent non-contrast CT using a third-generation dual-source scanner to obtain two datasets, i.e. 16.7% (sub-mSv CT, tube detector A) and 100% (standard-dose CT, combination of tube detector A and B) tube loads with spectral filtration. The performance of sub-mSv CT for the detection of stones was analyzed by two readers and compared with that of standard-dose CT. Image quality was measured subjectively and objectively.

RESULTS

In total, 171 stones were detected in 79 patients. The mean effective radiation doses of sub-mSv CT was 0.3 mSv. The sensitivity and specificity values for diagnosis of stones measuring ≥3 mm was 95.1% and 100% for sub-mSv CT. The sensitivity and specificity for all stone detection was 74.9% and 97.8%, respectivey, for sub-mSv CT. The image quality was lower for sub-mSv CT than for standard-dose CT (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Sub-mSv CT can be achieved with radiation doses close to KUB radiography. Sub-mSv CT with spectral filtration can be used to detect stones measuring ≥3 mm and be used as a follow-up imaging modality as an alternative to KUB radiography.

Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction Negatively Impacts the Risk Category Based on Agatston Score: A Study Combining Coronary Calcium Score Measurement and Coronary CT Angiography

Purpose

To assess the impact of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) on risk category for coronary artery disease by combining coronary calcium score measurement and coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

Materials and Methods

Eighty-nine patients (64.0% male) older than 18 years (64.4 ± 10.3 years) underwent coronary artery calcium scanning and prospectively ECG-triggered sequential CCTA examination. All raw data acquired in coronary artery calcium scanning were reconstructed by both filtered back projection (FBP) and SAFIRE algorithms with 5 different levels. Objective image quality and calcium quantification were evaluated and compared between FBP and all SAFIRE levels by the Sphericity Assumed test or Greenhouse-Geisser ε correction coefficient. Coronary artery stenosis was assessed in CCTA. Risk categories of all patients and of the patients with coronary artery stenosis in CCTA were compared between FBP and all SAFIRE levels by the Friedman test.

Results

The reconstruction protocol from traditional FBP to SAFIRE 5 was associated with a gradual reduction in CT value and image noise (P < 0.001) but associated with a gradual improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio (P < 0.001). There was a gradual reduction in coronary calcification quantification (Agatston score: from 73.5 in FBP to 38.1 in SAFIRE 5, P < 0.001) from traditional FBP to SAFIRE 5. There was a significant difference for the risk category between FBP and all levels of SAFIRE in all patients (from 3.5 in FBP to 3.2 in SAFIRE 5, P < 0.001) and in the patients with coronary artery stenosis in CCTA (from 4.0 in FBP to 3.6 in SAFIRE 5, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SAFIRE significantly reduces coronary calcification quantification compared to FBP, resulting in the reduction of risk categories based on the Agatston score. The risk categories of the patients with coronary artery stenosis in CCTA may also decline. Thus, SAFIRE may lead risk categories to underestimate the existence of significant coronary artery stenosis.

Comparison of standard-dose and half-dose dual-source abdominopelvic CT scans for evaluation of acute abdominal pain

Background

With the increasing number of computed tomography (CT) scans used for evaluation of acute abdominal pain, patient radiation exposure has increased rapidly.

Purpose

To determine whether the diagnostic performance of half-dose abdominopelvic CT is non-inferior to that of standard-dose CT for patients with acute abdominal pain.

Material and Methods

Ninety-eight patients with acute abdominal pain underwent dual-source abdominopelvic CT. Three sets of CT images were reconstructed: standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP); half-dose FBP; and half-dose sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE3). Diagnostic performance of the standard-dose scan was compared with that of the half-dose scans by using a non-inferiority test with a 10% margin. The overall image quality was subjectively measured.

Results

Diagnostic performance for overall disease diagnosis with half-dose scans (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.835 for FBP, 0.881 for SAFIRE3) was non-inferior to that of standard-dose FBP (AUC = 0.891) (95% confidence interval lower limit difference = −5.6% [half-dose FBP], −1.2% [half-dose SAFIRE3]). The diagnostic sensitivity for detection of neoplastic disease was lower with half-dose (75.0%) than with standard-dose FBP (91.7%). Effective dose and dose-length product with standard-dose imaging were 7.99 ± 2.55 mSv and 533.1 ± 170.3 mGy·cm, respectively; those of half-dose imaging were 3.99 ± 1.28 mSv and 266.6 ± 85.2 mGy·cm, respectively. The image quality was lower with half-dose than with standard-dose FBP scans ( P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Diagnostic performance of half-dose CT is non-inferior to that of standard-dose scan for evaluation of acute abdominal pain, despite inferior image quality.

Increased urinary bladder volume improves the detectability of urinary stones at the ureterovesical junction in non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of the urinary bladder volume on the detectability of urolithiasis at the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) using a low-dose CT (LD-CT) with iterative reconstruction (IR) and a standard-dose CT (SD-CT) without IR in a large cohort.

METHODS

Four hundred patients (278 males (69.5%), mean 44.6 ± 14.7 years) with urolithiasis at the UVJ were investigated either by an LD-CT with IR (n = 289, 72%) or an SD-CT without IR (n = 111, 28%) protocol. The detectability of distal urolithiasis was assessed by a dichotomous assessment (definite or questionable) by two radiologists in consensus and by a quantitative analysis of the signal density distribution across a line drawn parallel to the distal ureter. Based on the resulting graph, minimum/maximum density values and mean/maximum upslopes and downslopes were derived and calculated automatically. In all patients, the total bladder volume was calculated by a slice-by-slice approach on axial CT images.

RESULTS

Patients with definite stones showed significantly higher urinary bladder volumes compared to patients with questionable stones in both LD-CT and SD-CT (p < 0.01). These results were independent of stones' length and patients' BMI values. Using cutoffs of 92 ml for LD-CT and 69 ml for SD-CT, high positive predictive values/accuracy rates of 96%/85% (LD-CT) and 98%/86% (SD-CT) were observed to identify definite urinary stones.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary bladder volume has a significant impact on the detectability of distal urolithiasis. Moderate bladder filling by pre-CT hydration with subsequent CT scan at the time of high urge to void increases the detectability of urinary stones at the UVJ in clinical routine.

KEY POINTS

• Urinary bladder volume significantly affects the detectability of distal urolithiasis • Higher bladder volumes are associated with improved detectability of distal urinary stones • Oral pre-CT hydration for urolithiasis is easily applicable and cost-effective.

Bone mineral density assessment using iterative reconstruction compared with quantitative computed tomography as the standard of reference

This study examines the influence of iterative reconstruction on bone mineral density (BMD) measurement by comparison with standard quantitative computed tomography (QCT; reference) and two other protocols based on filtered back projection. Ten human cadaver specimens of the lumbar spine with a hydroxyapatite calibration phantom underneath, were scanned with 4 protocols: 1. standard QCT, 2. volume scan with FBP, 3. helical scan with FBP, and 4. helical scan with IR (Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR3D)). Radiation doses were recorded as CT dose index (CTDIvol) and BMD, signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. Mean hydroxyapatite concentration (HOA) did not differ significantly between protocols, ranging from 98.58 ± 31.09 mg cm3 (protocol 4) to 100.47 ± 30.82 mg cm3 (protocol 2). Paired sample correlations of HOA values for protocol 4 and protocols 1, 2 and 3 were nearly perfect with coefficients of 0.980, 0.979 and 0.982, respectively (p < 0.004). CTDIvol were 7.50, 5.00, 6.82 (±2.03) and 1.72 (±0.50) mGy for protocols 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Objective image quality was highest for protocol 4. The use of IR for BMD assessment significantly lowers radiation exposure compared to standard QCT and protocols with FBP while not degrading BMD measurement.

Comparison of Full- and Half-Dose Image Reconstruction With Filtered Back Projection or Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction in Dual-Source Single-Energy MDCT Urography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the image quality of and confidence in the presence of a lesion on CT urography images acquired using filtered back projection (FBP) with 100% and 50% radiation doses with those for images simultaneously acquired using sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction with strength 3 (SAFIRE) with 50% and 25% radiation doses for patients with a high risk for urothelial carcinomas.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 150 patients randomly underwent CT urography examinations performed using a dual-source single-energy scanner. After the radiation output of each tube was adjusted, datasets at three radiation dose levels were reconstructed using FBP and SAFIRE. Seven radiologists subjectively assessed image quality and confidence in the presence of a lesion for a total of 1200 datasets. Nonparametric methods for cluster data were used to estimate AUC values for variance methods on the basis of a noninferiority margin of 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean AUC value for image quality in SAFIRE with a 25% radiation dose was significantly lower than that of FBP with 100% radiation dose (p < 0.05 for all). The mean AUC values for the presence of a lesion were 0.907 and 0.894 for FBP, respectively, at 100% and 50% radiation doses, respectively, and 0.900 and 0.799 for SAFIRE at 50% and 25% radiation doses, respectively. However, the image quality of images acquired with SAFIRE at a 25% radiation dose was significantly inferior to that of images acquired with FBP at a 100% radiation dose.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of the experience of the radiologist, CT urography images acquired with FBP and SAFIRE with a 50% radiation dose were noninferior to those acquired with FBP with a 100% radiation dose in terms of image quality and confidence in the presence of a lesion, whereas those acquired with SAFIRE with 25% radiation dose were inferior.

Low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urinary stone

Purpose

To prospectively determine the diagnostic performance of low-dose CT (LDCT) with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) technique for the detection of urinary stone disease.

Results

The average DLP and ED was 408.16 ± 119.04 mGy and 6.12 ± 1.79 mSv in CDCT, and 138.19 ± 76.87 mGy and 2.07 ± 1.15 mSv in LDCT, respectively. The dose reduction rate of LDCT was nearly 66.1% for both DLP and ED (P < 0.05). LDCT–80% ASIR images showed great image quality (mean score = 4.09), which was similar to CDCT-FBP images (mean score = 4.17) (P > 0.05), but higher than LDCT-FBP images (mean score = 2.77) (P < 0.05).

Materials and Methods

70 consetutive patients with clinically suspected urolithiasis underwent non-enhanced CT. Followed by both conventional-dose CT (CDCT) and low-dose CT (LDCT) scans. Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) scanning was used, with a noise index setting of 13 in CDCT and 25 in LDCT. Reconstructions were performed with filtered back projection (FBP) and different settings of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [ASIR(40%, 60%, 80%)]. Urinary calculi (size, location, number), image quality (scale 1–5), image noise (scale 1–3) and diagnostic confidence levels (scale 1–3) were evaluated and measured by two radiologists independently. Radiation dose was recorded by calculating dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED). Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U test and Paired t tests.

Conclusions

LDCT with ASIR can reduce the radiation dose while maintain relatively high image quality in the diagnosis of urinary stone diseases.

Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT

Background Patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain often undergo abdominal computed tomography (CT). However, abdominal CT is associated with high radiation exposure. Purpose To evaluate diagnostic performance of a reduced-dose 100 kVp CT protocol with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction as compared to a linearly blended 120 kVp protocol for assessment of acute, non-traumatic abdominal pain. Material and Methods Two radiologists assessed 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series of 112 consecutive patients with acute non-traumatic pain (onset < 48 h) regarding image quality, noise, and artifacts on a five-point Likert scale. Both radiologists assessed both series for abdominal pathologies and for diagnostic confidence. Both 100 kVp and linearly blended 120 kVp series were quantitatively evaluated regarding radiation dose and image noise. Comparative statistics and diagnostic accuracy was calculated using receiver operating curve (ROC) statistics, with final clinical diagnosis/clinical follow-up as reference standard. Results Image quality was high for both series without detectable significant differences ( P = 0.157). Image noise and artifacts were rated low for both series but significantly higher for 100 kVp ( P ≤ 0.021). Diagnostic accuracy was high for both series (120 kVp: area under the curve [AUC] = 0.950, sensitivity = 0.958, specificity = 0.941; 100 kVp: AUC ≥ 0.910, sensitivity ≥ 0.937, specificity = 0.882; P ≥ 0.516) with almost perfect inter-rater agreement (Kappa = 0.939). Diagnostic confidence was high for both dose levels without significant differences (100 kVp 5, range 4-5; 120 kVp 5, range 3-5; P = 0.134). The 100 kVp series yielded 26.1% lower radiation dose compared with the 120 kVp series (5.72 ± 2.23 mSv versus 7.75 ± 3.02 mSv, P < 0.001). Image noise was significantly higher in reduced-dose CT (13.3 ± 2.4 HU versus 10.6 ± 2.1 HU; P < 0.001). Conclusion Reduced-dose abdominal CT using 100 kVp yields excellent image quality and high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Dual-Source Single-Energy Multidetector CT Used to Obtain Multiple Radiation Exposure Levels within the Same Patient: Phantom Development and Clinical Validation

Purpose To develop, in a phantom environment, a method to obtain multidetector computed tomographic (CT) data sets at multiple radiation exposure levels within the same patient and to validate its use for potential dose reduction by using different image reconstruction algorithms for the detection of liver metastases. Materials and Methods The American College of Radiology CT accreditation phantom was scanned by using a dual-source multidetector CT platform. By adjusting the radiation output of each tube, data sets at six radiation exposure levels (100%, 75%, 50%, 37.5%, 25%, and 12.5%) were reconstructed from two consecutive dual-source single-energy (DSSE) acquisitions, as well as a conventional single-source acquisition. A prospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed by using the same DSSE strategy in 19 patients who underwent multidetector CT of the liver for metastatic colorectal cancer. All images were reconstructed by using conventional weighted filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction with strength level of 3 (SAFIRE-3). Objective image quality metrics were compared in the phantom experiment by using multiple linear regression analysis. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze image quality metrics and diagnostic performance for lesion detection by readers. Results The phantom experiment showed comparable image quality between DSSE and conventional single-source acquisition. In the patient study, the mean size-specific dose estimates for the six radiation exposure levels were 13.0, 9.8, 5.8, 4.4, 3.2, and 1.4 mGy. For each radiation exposure level, readers' perception of image quality and lesion conspicuity was consistently ranked superior with SAFIRE-3 when compared with FBP (P ≤ .05 for all comparisons). Reduction of up to 62.5% in radiation exposure by using SAFIRE-3 yielded similar reader rankings of image quality and lesion conspicuity when compared with routine-dose FBP. Conclusion A method was developed and validated to synthesize multidetector CT data sets at multiple radiation exposure levels within the same patient. This technique may provide a foundation for future clinical trials aimed at estimating potential radiation dose reduction by using iterative reconstructions. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm

Purpose To determine the effect of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction (IR) on noise, contrast, resolution, and observer-based detectability of subtle hypoattenuating liver lesions and to estimate the dose reduction potential of the IR algorithm in question. Materials and Methods This prospective, single-center, HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. A dual-source computed tomography (CT) system was used to reconstruct CT projection data from 21 patients into six radiation dose levels (12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) on the basis of two CT acquisitions. A series of virtual liver lesions (five per patient, 105 total, lesion-to-liver prereconstruction contrast of -15 HU, 12-mm diameter) were inserted into the raw CT projection data and images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) (B31f kernel) and sinogram-affirmed IR (SAFIRE) (I31f-5 kernel). Image noise (pixel standard deviation), lesion contrast (after reconstruction), lesion boundary sharpness (average normalized gradient at lesion boundary), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared. Next, a two-alternative forced choice perception experiment was performed (16 readers [six radiologists, 10 medical physicists]). A linear mixed-effects statistical model was used to compare detection accuracy between FBP and SAFIRE and to estimate the radiation dose reduction potential of SAFIRE. Results Compared with FBP, SAFIRE reduced noise by a mean of 53% ± 5, lesion contrast by 12% ± 4, and lesion sharpness by 13% ± 10 but increased CNR by 89% ± 19. Detection accuracy was 2% higher on average with SAFIRE than with FBP (P = .03), which translated into an estimated radiation dose reduction potential (±95% confidence interval) of 16% ± 13. Conclusion SAFIRE increases detectability at a given radiation dose (approximately 2% increase in detection accuracy) and allows for imaging at reduced radiation dose (16% ± 13), while maintaining low-contrast detectability of subtle hypoattenuating focal liver lesions. This estimated dose reduction is somewhat smaller than that suggested by past studies. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis

Pediatric urolithiasis is an important and increasingly prevalent cause of pediatric morbidity and hospital admission. Ultrasound (US) is the recommended primary imaging modality for suspected urolithiasis in children. There is, however, widespread use of CT as a first-line study for abdominal pain in many institutions involved in pediatric care. The objective of this review is to outline state-of-the-art imaging modalities and methods for diagnosing urolithiasis in children. The pediatric radiologist plays a key role in ensuring that the appropriate imaging modality is performed in the setting of suspected pediatric urolithiasis. Our proposed imaging algorithm starts with US, and describes the optimal technique and indications for the use of CT. We emphasize the importance of improved communication with a greater collaborative approach between pediatric and general radiology departments so children undergo the appropriate imaging evaluation.

Determining the composition of urinary tract calculi using stone-targeted dual-energy CT: evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol in a clinical environment

OBJECTIVE

This study will evaluate the accuracy of dual-energy CT (DECT) in characterizing urinary tract stone composition on patients presenting to a UK hospital with renal colic. The study will also assess the additional radiation dose burden of DECT over standard protocol.

METHODS

Data from 106 DECTs between October 2011 and October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were imaged using a Toshiba Aquilion ONE^™ CT scanner (Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara-shi, Japan). All patients received a low-dose non-contrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis prior to stone-targeted DECT at 80 and 135 kVp and 40-mm field of view. Radiation dose output was evaluated using dose-length product (DLP). 19 stones were recovered and their compositions were analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

RESULTS

137 stones were characterized. Mean stone diameter was 8.8 mm (range 3-48 mm). There was an 18.7% increase in mean DLP for DECT over standard CT protocol (319.4 vs 269.1 mGy cm; p < 0.001). Infrared spectroscopy analysis of 19 recovered stones identified 15 stones as calcium, 2 stones as cystine and 2 stones as mixed composition. Dual energy correctly predicted 11 (78.6%) of 14 calcium stones, 2 (100%) of 2 mixed composition stones and 0 (0%) of 2 cystine stones, resulting in a fair agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.374, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

DECT is able to determine the composition of urinary tract stones with fair accuracy. Its utility is offset by a small but significant supplementary radiation exposure. Advances in knowledge: DECT can provide urological surgeons with useful diagnostic stone material information prior to planning optimal management of stone disease.

Radiation Dose Reduction in Pediatric Body CT Using Iterative Reconstruction and a Novel Image-Based Denoising Method

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose reduction potential of a novel image-based denoising technique in pediatric abdominopelvic and chest CT examinations and compare it with a commercial iterative reconstruction method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from 50 (25 abdominopelvic and 25 chest) clinically indicated pediatric CT examinations. For each examination, a validated noise-insertion tool was used to simulate half-dose data, which were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) methods. A newly developed denoising technique, adaptive nonlocal means (aNLM), was also applied. For each of the 50 patients, three pediatric radiologists evaluated four datasets: full dose plus FBP, half dose plus FBP, half dose plus SAFIRE, and half dose plus aNLM. For each examination, the order of preference for the four datasets was ranked. The organ-specific diagnosis and diagnostic confidence for five primary organs were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean (± SD) volume CT dose index for the full-dose scan was 5.3 ± 2.1 mGy for abdominopelvic examinations and 2.4 ± 1.1 mGy for chest examinations. For abdominopelvic examinations, there was no statistically significant difference between the half dose plus aNLM dataset and the full dose plus FBP dataset (3.6 ± 1.0 vs 3.6 ± 0.9, respectively; p = 0.52), and aNLM performed better than SAFIRE. For chest examinations, there was no statistically significant difference between the half dose plus SAFIRE and the full dose plus FBP (4.1 ± 0.6 vs 4.2 ± 0.6, respectively; p = 0.67), and SAFIRE performed better than aNLM. For all organs, there was more than 85% agreement in organ-specific diagnosis among the three half-dose configurations and the full dose plus FBP configuration.

CONCLUSION

Although a novel image-based denoising technique performed better than a commercial iterative reconstruction method in pediatric abdominopelvic CT examinations, it performed worse in pediatric chest CT examinations. A 50% dose reduction can be achieved while maintaining diagnostic quality.

Iterative Reconstruction Leads to Increased Subjective and Objective Image Quality in Cranial CT in Patients With Stroke

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether iterative reconstruction improves the quality of cranial CT (CCT) images of stroke patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one CCT studies of patients with infarction performed with either a low (260 mAs; n = 21) or standard (340 mAs; n = 30) dose were reconstructed with both filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) with five strength levels (S1-S5). The resulting six image sets (one FBP and one each for SAFIRE levels S1-S5) were rated separately by two blinded radiologists in terms of conspicuity of infarcted areas on a 5-point scale. Noise and infarct-to-normal brain as well as medullary-to-cortical contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured. Ratings, noise, and CNRs were intraindividually compared within the same dose group (Fisher exact test) and interindividually between the different dose groups (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test).

RESULTS

The strength level S4 showed the best conspicuity of infarcted areas. Compared with FBP, SAFIRE S4 statistically significantly (p < 0.01) reduced noise and improved CNRs without statistically significant differences in all subjective and objective criteria (p > 0.01) when the dose was reduced. Patients examined with a 260-mAs low-dose were exposed to a statistically significantly lower dose (1.77 vs 2.33 mSv; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE at strength level S4) leads to increased subjective and objective image quality in CCT and allows dose reduction (-24%) without losses in the demarcation of ischemic lesions.

Benefits of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction in 0.4 mSv ultra-low-dose CT of the upper abdomen following transarterial chemoembolisation: comparison to low-dose and standard-dose CT and filtered back projection technique

AIM

To evaluate the advantage of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SIR) compared to filtered back projection (FBP) in upper abdomen computed tomography (CT) after transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) at different tube currents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Post-TACE CT was performed with different tube currents successively varied in four steps (180, 90, 45 and 23 mAs) with 40 patients per group (mean age: 60±12 years, range: 23-85 years, sex: 70 female, 90 male). The data were reconstructed with standard FBP and five different SIR strengths. Image quality was independently rated by two readers on a five-point scale. High (Lipiodol-to-liver) as well as low (liver-to-fat) contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were intra-individually compared within one dose to determine the optimal strength (S1-S5) and inter-individually between different doses to determine the possibility of dose reduction using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Subjective image quality and objective CNR analysis were concordant: intra-individually, SIR was significantly (p<0.001) superior to FBP. Inter-individually, regarding different doses (180 versus 23 ref mAs), there was no significant (p=1.00) difference when using S5 SIR at 23 mAs instead of FBP.

CONCLUSION

SIR allows for an 88% dose reduction from 3.43 to 0.4 mSv in unenhanced CT of the liver following TACE without subjective or objective loss in image quality.

[Infectious diseases and injuries of bladder and urinary tract]

Urinary tract infections are the most common infectious diseases in Germany. In most cases clarification does not rely on imaging techniques other than sonography and is made mostly based on clinical symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used in selected cases to find the cause and detection or exclusion of complications, e.g. recurrent or atypical and complicated courses. The method of choice for clarification of urolithiasis is CT. Using low-dose techniques, detection or exclusion of urinary stones can be achieved with a high sensitivity and specificity as well as an acceptable level of radiation exposure. Native stone CT supplies additional fundamental information that can substantially influence further therapy planning. The diagnosis of ureteral injuries is clinically and radiologically not trivial and clarification is aided by urographic contrast media. The method of CT cystography has an important role in the diagnostics of urinary bladder injuries.