Pelvic Evaluation in Thoracolumbar Corrective Spine Surgery: How I Do It

The Role of Pelvic Compensation in Sagittal Balance and Imbalance: The Impact of Pelvic Compensation on Spinal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab system does not include a pelvic compensation (PC) subtype, potentially contributing to gaps in clinical characteristics and treatment strategy for deformity correction. It also remains uncertain as to whether PC has differing roles in sagittal balance (SB) or imbalance (SI) status. To compare radiological parameters and SRS-22r domains between patients with failed pelvic compensation (FPC) and successful pelvic compensation (SPC) based on preoperative SB and SI.

METHODS

A total of 145 adult spinal deformity patients who received deformity correction were analyzed. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were collected for statistical analysis. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on the median value of PT/PI ratio (PTr) and the cutoff value of SB. Patients with low PTr and high PTr were defined as FPC and SPC, respectively. Radiographic and clinical characteristics of different groups were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with SPC exhibited significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, PTr, and T1 pelvic angle as compared to patients with FPC, irrespective of SB or SI. No apparent differences in any of SRS-22r domains were observed at follow-up when comparing the SB-FPC and SB-SPC patients. However, patients with SI-SPC exhibited significantly better function, self-image, satisfaction, and subtotal domains at follow-up relative to those with SI-FPC. When SI-FPC and SI-SPC patients were subdivided further based on the degree of PI-LL by adjusting for age, the postoperative function and self-image domains were significantly better in the group with overcorrection of PI-LL than undercorrection of PI-LL in SI-FPC patients. However, no differences in these SRS-22r scores were observed when comparing the subgroups in SI-SPC patients.

CONCLUSION

Flexible pelvic rotation is associated with benefits to the correction of sagittal parameters, irrespective of preoperative SB or SI status. However, PC is only significantly associated with clinical outcomes under SI. Patients with SI-FPC exhibit poorer postoperative clinical outcomes, which should be recommended to minimize PI-LL.

Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?

BACKGROUND

There are few data on the impact of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) on sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Prior studies have attempted to delineate the relationship by performing measurements on AP radiographs and using mathematical models to determine changes in postoperative pelvic tilt. This information is clinically significant to a surgeon when evaluating acetabular/pelvic position intraoperatively and understanding spinopelvic alignment changes postoperatively; therefore, radiographic changes from PAO should be described in more detail.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this study, we asked: (1) Does the performance of PAO result in consistent changes in spinopelvic alignment, as measured on EOS radiographs? (2) Does this differ for unilateral versus bilateral PAOs? (3) Does this differ in the setting of a mobile spine versus an immobile spine? (4) Does this differ based on preoperative pelvic tilt?

METHODS

Mean preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative (15 ± 8 months from surgery, minimum 11 months, maximum 65 months) EOS hip-to-ankle standing and sitting radiographs for 55 patients in a prospectively collected registry who underwent PAO with a single surgeon from January 1, 2019, to January 11, 2022, were measured for pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis, lateral center-edge angle, L1 pelvic angle, and pubic symphysis to the sacroiliac index. Normality was assessed and paired sample t-tests (normally distributed data) or Wilcoxon signed rank tests (not normally distributed data) were utilized to assess if any measurements changed from preoperative to postoperative. Patients were then divided based on whether they had unilateral or bilateral dysplasia and unilateral or bilateral surgery, and these subgroups were analyzed the same way as the entire cohort. Two more subgroups were then formed based on lumbar mobility, defined as a change in sitting-to-standing lumbar lordosis less or greater than 1 SD from the population mean preoperatively, and the subgroups were analyzed the same way as the entire cohort. Finally, two additional subgroups were formed, preoperative standing pelvic tilt less than 10° and more than 20°, and analyzed the same as the entire cohort.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, the median (IQR) standing lateral-center edge angle increased 17°, from a median of 21° (10°) to a median of 38° (8° [95% confidence interval (CI) 16° to 20°; p < 0.001). The median sitting lateral center-edge angle increased 17°, from a median of 18° (8°) to a median of 35° (8° [95% CI 14° to 19°]; p < 0.001). Standing pelvic incidence increased from 50° ± 11° to 52° ± 12° (mean difference 2° [95% CI 1° to 3°]; p = 0.004), but there were no changes for other measured parameters. There were no changes in any of the spinopelvic parameters for patients with unilateral dysplasia receiving a unilateral PAO, but patients with bilateral dysplasia who underwent bilateral PAOs demonstrated an increase in pelvic incidence from 57° (14°) to 60° (16°) (95% CI 1° to 5°; p = 0.02) and a decrease in pubic symphysis to sacroiliac index from 84 mm (24 mm) to 77 mm (23 mm) (95% CI -7° to -2°; p = 0.007). Patients with mobile lumbar spines preoperatively did not exhibit any changes in sagittal spinopelvic alignment, but patients with immobile lumbar spines preoperatively experienced several changes after surgery. Patients with less than 10° of standing pelvic tilt demonstrated a median (IQR) 2° increase in pelvic incidence from median 43° (9°) to 45° (12° [95% CI 0.3° to 4°]; p = 0.03), but they did not experience any other changes in sagittal spinopelvic alignment parameters postoperatively. Patients with preoperative pelvic tilt more than 20° did not experience any change in sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

CONCLUSION

PAO increases pelvic incidence, potentially because of anterior translation of the hip center. There were no changes in other spinopelvic parameters postoperatively except after bilateral PAO. Additionally, patients lacking spine mobility preoperatively, indicated by a minimal change in lumbar lordosis between standing and sitting positions, may experience several changes in spinopelvic alignment, including increased mobility of their spine after PAO. This may be because of decreased compensatory spine splinting after increasing acetabular coverage, but further research including patient-reported outcomes is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

The role of femoral obliquity angle and T1 pelvic angle in predicting quality of life after spinal surgery in adult spinal deformities

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformities (ASD) represent a growing clinical condition related to chronic pain, disability and reduction in quality of life (QoL). A strong correlation among spinal alignment, spinopelvic parameters and QoL after spinal fusion surgery in ASD patients was thoroughly investigated over the last decade, However, only few studies focused on the relationship between lumbo-pelvic-femoral parameters - such as Femoral Obliquity Angle (FOA), T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA) and QoL.

METHODS

Radiological and clinical data from 43 patients surgically treated with thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion for ASD between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were the correlation between preoperative spino-pelvic-femoral parameters and postoperative clinical, functional outcomes and QoL. Secondary outcomes were: changes in sagittal radiographic parameters spino-pelvic-femoral, clinical and functional outcomes and the rate of complications after surgery.

RESULTS

Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, spinopelvic femoral parameters (FOA, TPA, pre and post-operative) are directly statistically correlated to the quality of life (ODI, SRS-22, pre and post-operative; > 0,6 strong correlation, p <  0.05). Stratifying the patients according pre preoperative FOA value (High FOA ≥ 10 and Normal/Low FOA <  10), those belonging to the first group showed worse clinical (VAS: 5.2 +/- 1.4 vs 2.9 +/- 0.8) and functional outcomes (ODI: 35.6+/- 6.8 vs 23.2 +/- 6.5) after 2 years of follow-up and a greater number of mechanical complications (57.9% vs 8.3% p <  0.0021).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, preoperative FOA and TPA could be important prognostic parameters for predicting disability and quality of life after spinal surgery in ASD patients and early indicators of possible spinal sagittal malalignment. FOA and TPA, like other and better known spinopelvic parameters, should always be considered when planning corrective surgery in ASD patients.

Vertebral Fractures Associated with Spinal Sagittal Imbalance and Quality of Life in Acromegaly: A Radiographic Study with EOS 2D/3D Technology

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is commonly complicated by arthropathy and skeletal fragility with high risk of vertebral fractures (VFs).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether VFs may be associated with sagittal spine deformities, arthropathy, impaired quality of life (QoL), pain, and disability.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with acromegaly (median age: 55 years, 20 males) and 38 matched control subjects were evaluated by a low-dose sagittal and coronal planes, X-ray imaging system (EOS®-2D/3D) for morphometric VFs, radiological signs of spine arthropathy, and spine deformities (Cobb thoracic index ≥40°, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis ≥10°, pelvic tilt >20°, and sagittal vertical axis ≥4 cm) determining sagittal spine imbalance. Acromegalic patients were also evaluated by questionnaires for QoL (Acromegaly QoL Questionnaire [AcroQoL] and Short Form-36 [SF-36]) and pain and disability (Western Ontario and McMaster University [WOMAC]).

RESULTS

Acromegalic patients showed higher prevalence of thoracic hyperkyphosis (i.e., Cobb thoracic index ≥40°; p = 0.04) and pelvic tilt >20° (p = 0.02) than control subjects. VFs were found in 34.2% of acromegalic patients (p = 0.003 vs. control subjects), in relationship with higher prevalence of hyperkyphosis (p = 0.03), pelvic tilt >20° (p = 0.04), sagittal vertical axis ≥4 cm (p = 0.03), and moderate/severe subchondral degeneration (p = 0.01). Moreover, patients with VFs had lower AcroQoL general health (p = 0.007) and SF-36 general health (p = 0.002) scores and higher WOMAC pain (p = 0.003) and global (p = 0.009) scores than patients who did not fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

In acromegaly, VFs may be associated with spine deformities and sagittal imbalance, spine arthropathy, impaired QoL, and disability.

The severity of developmental dysplasia of the hip does not correlate with the abnormality in pelvic incidence

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the severity of Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and the abnormality in pelvic incidence (PI).

Methods

This was a retrospective study analyzing 53 DDH patients and 53 non-DDH age-matched controls. Computed tomography images were used to construct three-dimensional pelvic model. The Crowe classification was used to classify the severity of DDH. The midpoint of the femoral head centers and sacral endplates were projected to the sagittal plane of the pelvis. The PI was defined as the angle between a line perpendicular to the sacral plate at its midpoint and a line connecting this point to the axis of the femoral heads. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the differences between the PI of DDH group and the non-DDH controls group. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was used to determine the correlation between the severity of DDH and PI.

Results

Patients with DDH had a significantly (p = 0.041) higher PI than the non-DDH controls (DDH 47.6 ± 8.2°, normal 44.2 ± 8.8°). Crowe type I patients had a significantly (p = 0.038) higher PI (48.2 ± 7.6°) than the non-DDH controls. No significant difference between the PI in Crowe type II or III patients and the PI in non-DDH controls were found (Crowe type II, 50.2 ± 9.6°, p = 0.073; Crowe type III, 43.8 ± 7.2°, p = 0.930). No correlation was found between the severity of DDH and the PI (r = 0.091, p = 0.222).

Conclusions

No correlation was found between the severity of DDH and the PI. The study confirmed that the PI in DDH (Crowe type I) group was higher than that of the non-DDH control group, while the PI does not correlate with the severity of DDH.

Correlations between radiographic spinopelvic parameters and health-related quality of life: A prospective evaluation of 37 patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between spinopelvic parameters and health-related quality of life.

METHODS

Patients with Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) were asked to volunteer to participate in this study from April 2018 to December 2019. Patient data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and duration of the diagnosis of FSHD were obtained. Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire was completed for all patients. All patients underwent lateral radiography of the whole spine. The radiographic parameters examined were pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1 SPI), thoracic kyphosis (TK), Pelvic incidence- lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (16 females and 21 males) were included in the study, with a mean age of 39.1 years. The mean duration of diagnosis was 13.5 ± 11.4 years and mean BMI was 24.2 kg/m2. Physical composite score (PCS) was 38.7 and mental composite score (MCS) 60.8 detected. Radiographic analyses included the following: the mean PT was 9.1°, PI 52.1°, SS 43.5°, LL 67.9°, CL 9.8°, T1 SPI -2.5°, TK 23.1°, SVA 37.6 mm. PI-LL was -13.1°. We identified 31 patients with match (left) PI-LL and six patients with mismatch (right) PI-LL.

CONCLUSION

Hyperlordosis inlumbar spine, hypolordosis in cervical spine and negative sagittal balance were the most common spinal misalignments in patients with FSHD. These patients have lower composite PCS than composite MCS. There was a significantly negative correlation between LL, PI-LL and PCS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV Cross-sectional study.

Alphabet Soup: Sagittal Balance Correction Osteotomies of the Spine-What Radiologists Should Know

Global sagittal malalignment has been demonstrated to have correlation with clinical symptoms and is a key component to be restored in adult spinal deformity. In this article, various types of sagittal balance-correction osteotomies are reviewed primarily on the basis of the 3 most commonly used procedures: Smith-Petersen osteotomy, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and vertebral column resection. Familiarity with the expected imaging appearance and commonly encountered complications seen on postoperative imaging studies following correction osteotomies is crucial for accurate image interpretation.