1
|
Risk Factors of Ureteral Stenosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Study in National Referral Hospital in Indonesia. Adv Urol 2021; 2021:2410951. [PMID: 33510785 PMCID: PMC7822702 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2410951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Ureteral stenosis is one of the most common urological complications following kidney transplantations. It is occurred in 2–10% of patients and poses a significant problem to the patients as it may lead to permanent damage to renal damage. Identification of risk factors is important to prevent the incidence of ureteral stenosis. Thus, we aim to determine the risk factors of ureteral stenosis in the Indonesian population. This is a retrospective analysis of 487 kidney transplant patients performed in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital between 2014 and 2018. We collected and compared donor and recipient demography data in recipients who developed ureteral stenosis and recipients who did not develop ureteral stenosis. Ureteral stenosis was defined as the presence of hydronephrosis from ultrasound and increased number of serum creatinine. The overall incidence of ureteral stenosis post-kidney transplantation in our center is 6.6% (32 from 487 patients) from January 2014 until June 2018. We found that older donor and recipient age more frequent in developing ureteral stenosis post-kidney transplantation (p < 0.001). We also found that donors with number of arteries more than 2 (p < 0.001) and prolonged warm ischemic time (p < 0.05) are more frequently to develop ureteral stenosis post-kidney transplantation. There is no association between type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension with ureteral stenosis in this study. Donor age, recipient age, donor number of arteries more than 2, and prolonged warm ischemia time are associated with ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Retrospective Analysis of the first 100 Kidney Transplants at the Istanbul Okan University, Health Application and Research Center. MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL 2020; 53:221-227. [PMID: 32377087 PMCID: PMC7192273 DOI: 10.14744/semb.2019.54533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: The renal transplant program of Istanbul Okan University Hospital started in August 2017. Five cadaveric and 95 living donor kidney transplants have been performed for over 16 months. In this study, we aimed to share our experiences regarding kidney transplantation. Methods: In this study, a retrospective analysis of 100 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at the Istanbul Okan University over 16 months, the Health Application and Research Center was carried out. Patients’ demographics, creatinine levels of donors and recipients, co-morbid conditions, postoperative complications, features of arterial anastomosis and arterial variations observed on computed tomography angiography of donor-patient were assessed. Results: Mean age of donor patients was 44.05±13.76 (18-71) years. All living donors had computed tomography angiography for assessment of the vascular structure of both kidneys. Accessory right kidney artery was the most dominant vascular variation (16.5%). The primary cause of chronic renal disease was diabetes mellitus (36.4%) and hypertension (15.6%). Mean warm and cold ischemia time was 1.82±0.44 (1-3) and 40.25±6.12 (31-57) minutes, respectively. The most observed postoperative complication was stenosis of ureter anastomosis (4.1%). End-to-end arterial anastomosis between renal and internal iliac arteries was the most preferred anastomosis (57.2%). Conclusion: Increasing kidney transplantation, which is the most appropriate treatment in terms of cost-effectiveness, will be beneficial for patient health and economy of the country.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Urologic complications of renal transplant occur commonly and can have significant impact on graft function, survival, and patient morbidity. This review examines the prevalence of urologic complications, risk factors, diagnosis and options for management of the most common urologic complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah R Choate
- Presbyterian Transplant Services, Presbyterian HealthCare Services, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Laura A Mihalko
- Division of Urology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Bevan T Choate
- Department of Urology, Raymond G. Murphy VA Health Medical Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu C, Zhang W, Peng Y, Li L, Gao X, Liu M, Fang Z, Wang Z, Ming S, Dong H, Shen R, Xie F, Sun Y, Gao X. Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in the Treatment of Benign Ureteral Strictures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. J Endourol 2019; 33:255-262. [PMID: 30628477 DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Although balloon dilatation is one of the main endoscopic procedures used to treat benign ureteral strictures, its precise efficacy remains controversial. We aimed to identify, combine, and analyze existing published data to ascertain the efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign ureteral strictures. METHODS In December 2018, a literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We included reports in which the study population consisted of patients who underwent endoscopic balloon dilatation for the treatment of benign ureteral strictures. Technical, short-term, and long-term success rates (expressed as mean ± standard error) were adopted as the outcome measures. RESULTS Using our search strategy, a total of 19 studies (all series reports) were included for analysis. Using a random-effects model, the pooled technical success rate of endoscopic balloon dilatation for benign ureteral strictures was found to be 89% ± 4%. Furthermore, the short-term success rate (i.e., 3 months after surgery) was 60% ± 10%, and the long-term success rate (i.e., 6-12 months after surgery) was 54% ± 14%. In the subgroup analysis, the success rate of endoscopic balloon dilatation for ≤2-cm benign ureteral strictures was significantly higher than that for >2-cm ones (odds ratio [OR]: 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.35). In addition, the success rate in cases with strictures of onset timing ≤3 months was relatively higher than that in cases with strictures of onset timing >3 months (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.15-1.43). CONCLUSION Our study indicates that endoscopic balloon dilatation has a high success rate in the treatment of benign ureteral strictures with length ≤2 cm and onset timing ≤3 months. However, there is still no consensus on balloon type, dilatation pressure, expansion number, postoperative ureteral stent type, and stent retention time for the balloon dilatation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoyue Lu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yonghan Peng
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaomin Gao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ziyu Fang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zeyu Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaoxiong Ming
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Dong
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Shen
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fei Xie
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinghao Sun
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaofeng Gao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patel U, Kumar S, Johnson OW, Jeon JH, Das R. Long-term Graft and Patient Survival after Percutaneous Angioplasty or Arterial Stent Placement for Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis: A 21-year Matched Cohort Study. Radiology 2018; 290:555-563. [PMID: 30398440 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To compare long-term graft and patient survival after percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) or stent placement for transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) with a control cohort without TRAS. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective matched cohort study of 41 patients (median age, 49 years; range, 18-72 years), including 27 male patients (median age, 48 years; range, 18-67 years) and 14 female patients (median age, 52 years; range, 24-68 years), with TRAS from December 1995 through 2016. Primary end points were death-censored graft and patient survival, compared by using log-rank test and Cox proportional regression. Secondary outcomes were improvement in renal function, blood pressure (BP), and complications. Results Twenty-four patients underwent PTA and 17 received stent placements. Ten-year graft survival was 92.1% (range, 83.2%-100%) versus 81.4% (range, 67.8%-95.3%) (P = .56), and 10-year patient survival was 89.9% (79.1%-100%) versus 84.7% (72.1%-97.5%) (P = .49), for the study and control groups, respectively. Five patients (12%) resumed dialysis in each group and a total of 17 patients died (eight in the study group and nine in the control group). Most patients died with a functioning graft (seven of eight in the study group and seven of nine in the control group). Posttreatment median systolic and diastolic BP improved by 12% and 7.4%, respectively, and serum creatinine improved by 27%. Normal systolic BP and serum creatinine level at 1 year after treatment were associated with better survival for patients (P = .04; hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0, 1.075) and grafts (P < .001; HR, 1.02; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.027). Other covariates, including PTA versus renal stent placement, intra-arterial pressure gradient greater than 10%, diastolic BP, age at transplantation, sex, graft type, rejection, and delayed graft function, were not significant. Five patients (12.2%) had a complication (Society of Interventional Radiology class A, two of 41 [4.9%]; class B, two of 41 [4.9%]; and class D, one of 41 [2.4%]); 30-day graft loss and patient mortality were zero. Conclusion Long-term graft and patient survival after endovascular correction of transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) was similar to that without TRAS and most patients avoided returning to dialysis. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Dickey and Durrani in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uday Patel
- From the Department of Interventional Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Medical School, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, England (U.P., R.D.); Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, England (S.K.); Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England (O.W.J.); and Department of Radiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England (J.H.J.)
| | - Shankar Kumar
- From the Department of Interventional Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Medical School, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, England (U.P., R.D.); Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, England (S.K.); Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England (O.W.J.); and Department of Radiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England (J.H.J.)
| | - Oscar William Johnson
- From the Department of Interventional Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Medical School, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, England (U.P., R.D.); Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, England (S.K.); Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England (O.W.J.); and Department of Radiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England (J.H.J.)
| | - Justyn Hwee Jeon
- From the Department of Interventional Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Medical School, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, England (U.P., R.D.); Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, England (S.K.); Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England (O.W.J.); and Department of Radiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England (J.H.J.)
| | - Raj Das
- From the Department of Interventional Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Medical School, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, England (U.P., R.D.); Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, England (S.K.); Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England (O.W.J.); and Department of Radiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, England (J.H.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arpali E, Al-Qaoud T, Martinez E, Redfield RR, Leverson GE, Kaufman DB, Odorico JS, Sollinger HW. Impact of ureteral stricture and treatment choice on long-term graft survival in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:1977-1985. [PMID: 29446225 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 01/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the influence of urological complications occurring within the first year after kidney transplantation on long-term patient and graft outcomes, and sought to examine the impact of the management approach of ureteral strictures on long-term graft function. We collected data on urological complications occurring within the first year posttransplant. Graft survivals, patient survival, and rejection rates were compared between recipients with and without urological complications. Male gender of the recipient, delayed graft function, and donor age were found to be significant risk factors for urological complications after kidney transplantation (P < .05). Death censored graft survival analysis showed that only ureteral strictures had a negative impact on long-term graft survival (P = .0009) compared to other complications. Death censored graft survival was significantly shorter in kidney recipients managed initially with minimally invasive approach when compared to the recipients with no stricture (P = .001). However, graft survival was not statistically different in patients managed initially with open surgery (P = .47). Ureteral strictures following kidney transplantation appear to be strongly negatively correlated with long-term graft survival. Our analysis suggests that kidney recipients with ureteral stricture should be managed initially with open surgery, with better long-term graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Arpali
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - T Al-Qaoud
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - E Martinez
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - R R Redfield
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - G E Leverson
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - D B Kaufman
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - J S Odorico
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - H W Sollinger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Complications chirurgicales de la transplantation rénale. Prog Urol 2016; 26:1066-1082. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.09.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|