Aliasing-free reduced field-of-view parallel imaging

PURPOSE

To reconstruct aliasing-free full field-of-view (FOV) images for reduced FOV (rFOV) parallel imaging (PI) with Cartesian and Wave sampling, which suffers from aliasing artifacts using existing PI methods.

THEORY AND METHODS

The sensitivity encoding method (SENSE) was extended to the Soft-SENSE models supporting multiple-set coil sensitivity maps (CSM) and point spread functions (PSF) for Cartesian and Wave sampled rFOV PI, respectively. The multiple-set CSM and PSF were created from full FOV CSM and PSF according to the image folding process induced by rFOV sampling. The Soft-SENSE reconstructions could be solved by the same algorithms for the conventional full FOV SENSE reconstruction.

RESULTS

Soft-SENSE using multiple-set full FOV CSM and PSF successfully reconstruct aliasing-free full FOV image from rFOV PI data with Cartesian and Wave sampling. The proposed rFOV PI enables flexible control of the aliasing and achieves comparable geometry factors as the standard full FOV PI with the same net acceleration factor. Reduced FOV PI improves the computational efficiency of iterative compressed sensing (CS) and PI reconstruction, especially for high-resolution volumetric imaging, thanks to the reduced fast Fourier transform (FFT) size. Moreover, rFOV PI reconstruction provides a potential alternative to the phase oversampling for the FOV aliasing problem.

CONCLUSION

The proposed Soft-SENSE using full FOV CSM and PSF could reconstruct aliasing-free full FOV image for rFOV PI, and make it a viable solution enabling more flexible PI acceleration and effectively improving the computational efficiency of iterative CSPI reconstruction.

Acceleration of Brain TOF-MRA with Compressed Sensitivity Encoding: A Multicenter Clinical Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The clinical practice of three-dimensional TOF-MRA, despite its capability in brain artery assessment, has been hampered by the relatively long scan time, while recent developments in fast imaging techniques with random undersampling has shed light on an improved balance between image quality and imaging speed. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of TOF-MRA accelerated by compressed sensitivity encoding and to identify the optimal acceleration factors for routine clinical use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred subjects, enrolled at 5 centers, underwent 8 brain TOF-MRA sequences: 5 sequences using compressed sensitivity encoding with acceleration factors of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 (CS2, CS4, CS6, CS8, and CS10), 2 using sensitivity encoding with factors of 2 and 4 (SF2 and SF4), and 1 without acceleration as a reference sequence (RS). Five large arteries, 6 medium arteries, and 6 small arteries were evaluated quantitatively (reconstructed signal intensity, structural similarity, contrast ratio) and qualitatively (scores on arteries, artifacts, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence for aneurysm and stenosis). Comparisons were performed among the 8 sequences.

RESULTS

The quantitative measurements showed that the reconstructed signal intensities of the assessed arteries and the structural similarity consistently decreased as the compressed sensitivity encoding acceleration factor increased, and no significant difference was found for the contrast ratios in pair-wise comparisons among SF2, CS2, and CS4. Qualitative evaluations showed no significant difference in pair-wise comparisons among RS, SF2, and CS2 (P > .05). The visualization of all the assessed arteries was acceptable for CS2 and CS4, while 2 small arteries in images of CS6 were not reliably displayed, and the visualization of large arteries was acceptable in images of CS8 and CS10.

CONCLUSIONS

CS4 is recommended for routine brain TOF-MRA with balanced image quality and acquisition time; CS6, for examinations when small arteries are not evaluated; and CS10, for fast visualization of large arteries.

Novel Ultrafast Spiral Head MR Angiography Compared to Standard MR and CT Angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracranial vessel imaging by time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) is one of the most frequently performed investigations in clinical neuroradiology. Particularly in the acute setting, fast imaging is needed for diagnostics, with a sequence ideally depicting even small vessels. The purpose of this study was to compare image and diagnostic quality of a novel ultrashort TOF-MRA sequence accelerated by spiral imaging (TOF-Spiral-short) to a standard TOF-MRA sequence accelerated by compressed sensing (TOF-CS) and to CT angiography (CTA).

METHODS

Forty-one patients (36.6% showing vessel pathologies) who had undergone TOF-CS (acquisition duration: 4 minutes 8 seconds), TOF-Spiral-short (acquisition duration: 51 seconds; spiral imaging [accelerating factor 1.3], decreased field of view [accelerating factor 1.2], and increased voxel size [accelerating factor 3.3]), and CTA were retrospectively evaluated. Assessment of image quality, diagnostic confidence, and quantification of stenosis or aneurysm diameter were performed by two readers.

RESULTS

Image quality at the skull base was slightly reduced with TOF-Spiral-short compared to CTA and TOF-CS (P < .05). Delineation of small intracranial vessels was improved by TOF-Spiral-short compared to CTA (P < .0001). In TOF-Spiral-short, diagnostic confidence was not reduced compared to TOF-CS in patients with vessel pathologies. We observed no significant difference in quantitative pathology assessment between TOF-Spiral-short and the other two modalities. TOF-Spiral-short enabled the correct identification of all vessel pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerating TOF-MRA of brain-feeding arteries by a novel ultrashort spiral imaging sequence shows adequate image quality and sufficient diagnostic performance. Thus, TOF-Spiral-short holds potential for fast and reliable diagnostics of vessel pathologies, particularly in the acute setting.

High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Compressed Sensing for Intracranial and Extracranial Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging

Objective

To compare conventional sensitivity encoding (SENSE) to compressed sensing plus SENSE (CS) for high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) of intracranial and extracranial arteries.

Materials and Methods

HR-MRI was performed in 14 healthy volunteers. Three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and proton density-weighted imaging (PD) were acquired using CS or SENSE under the same total acceleration factors (AF_t)-5.5, 6.8, and 9.7 for T1WI and 3.2, 4.0, and 5.8 for PD-to achieve reduced scanning times in comparison with the original imaging sequence (SENSE T1WI, AF_t 3.5; SENSE PD, AF_t 2.0) using the 3-tesla system. Two neuroradiologists measured signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and used visual scoring systems to assess image quality. Acceptable imaging was defined as a visual score ≥ 2. Repeated measures analysis of variance and Cochran's Q test were performed.

Results

CS yielded better image quality and vessel delineation than SENSE in T1WI with AF_t of 5.5, 6.8, and 9.7, and in PD with AF_t of 5.8 (p < 0.05). CS T1WI with AF_t of 5.5 and CS PD with AF_t of 3.2 and 4.0 did not differ significantly from original imaging (p > 0.05). SNR and CNR in CS were higher than they were in SENSE, but lower than they were in the original images (p < 0.05). CS yielded higher proportions of acceptable imaging than SENSE (CS T1WI with AF_t of 6.8 and PD with AF_t of 5.8; p < 0.0167).

Conclusion

CS is superior to SENSE, and may be a reliable acceleration method for vessel HR-MRI using AF_t of 5.5 for T1WI, and 3.2 and 4.0 for PD.