1
|
Nguyen DL, Greenwood HI, Rahbar H, Grimm LJ. Evolving Treatment Paradigms for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Imaging Needs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2330503. [PMID: 38090808 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonobligate precursor to invasive cancer that classically presents as asymptomatic calcifications on screening mammography. The increase in DCIS diagnoses with organized screening programs has raised concerns about overdiagnosis, while a patientcentric push for more personalized care has increased awareness about DCIS overtreatment. The standard of care for most new DCIS diagnoses is surgical excision, but nonsurgical management via active monitoring is gaining attention, and multiple clinical trials are ongoing. Imaging, along with demographic and pathologic information, is a critical component of active monitoring efforts. Commonly used imaging modalities including mammography, ultrasound, and MRI, as well as newer modalities such as contrast-enhanced mammography and dedicated breast PET, can provide prognostic information to risk stratify patients for DCIS active monitoring eligibility. Furthermore, radiologists will be responsible for closely surveilling patients on active monitoring and identifying if invasive progression occurs. Active monitoring is a paradigm shift for DCIS care, but the success or failure will rely heavily on the interpretations and guidance of radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek L Nguyen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Heather I Greenwood
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lars J Grimm
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deng XY, Cao PW, Nan SM, Pan YP, Yu C, Pan T, Dai G. Differentiation Between Phyllodes Tumors and Fibroadenomas of Breast Using Mammography-based Machine Learning Methods: A Preliminary Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:729-736. [PMID: 37481337 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the diagnostic performance of a mammography-based radiomics model for distinguishing phyllodes tumors (PTs) from fibroadenomas (FAs) of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 156 patients were retrospectively included (75 with PTs, 81 with FAs) and divided into training and validation groups at a ratio of 7:3. Radiomics features were extracted from craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed to select features. Three machine learning classifiers, including logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbor classifier (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM), were implemented in the radiomics model, imaging model and combined model. Receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were computed. RESULTS Among 1084 features, the LASSO algorithm selected 17 features, and PCA further selected 6 features. Three machine learning classifiers yielded the same AUC of 0.935 in the validation group for the radiomics model. In the imaging model, KNN yielded the highest accuracy rate of 89.4% and AUC of 0.947 in the validation set. For the combined model, the SVM classifier reached the highest AUC of 0.918 with an accuracy rate of 86.2%, sensitivity of 83.9%, and specificity of 89.4% in the training group. In the validation group, LR yielded the highest AUC of 0.973. The combined model had a relatively higher AUC than the radiomics model or imaging model, especially in the validation group. CONCLUSIONS Mammography-based radiomics features demonstrate good diagnostic performance for discriminating PTs from FAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Ying Deng
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Pei-Wei Cao
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuai-Ming Nan
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yue-Peng Pan
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chang Yu
- Department of Pathology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ting Pan
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gang Dai
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang B, Yang D, Zhang X, Gong X, Xu T, Han J, Ren Y, Zou S, Li L, Wang Y. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in breast ductal abnormalities. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:25. [PMID: 36899406 PMCID: PMC10007791 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00539-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ductal lesions are an important, often overlooked, and poorly understood issue in breast imaging, which have a risk of underlying malignancy ranging from 5 to 23%. Ultrasonography (US), which has largely replaced galactography or ductography, has become an important imaging method to assess patients with ductal lesions. However, it is difficult to distinguish benign from malignant ductal abnormalities only by ultrasonography, most of which are recommended to be at least in subcategory 4A; these require biopsy according to the ACR BI-RADS®atlas 5th Edition-breast ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been shown to be valuable for differentiating benign from malignant tumors, but its value is unclear in breast ductal lesions. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to explore the characteristics of malignant ductal abnormalities on US and CEUS imaging and the diagnostic value of CEUS in breast ductal abnormalities. METHODS Overall, 82 patients with 82 suspicious ductal lesions were recruited for this prospective study. They were divided into benign and malignant groups according to the pathological results. Morphologic features and quantitative parameters of US and CEUS were analyzed by comparison and multivariate logistic regression to determine the independent risk factors. The diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS Shape, margin, inner echo, size, microcalcification and blood flow classification on US, wash-in time, enhancement intensity, enhancement mode, enhancement scope, blood perfusion defects, peripheral high enhancement and boundary on CEUS were identified as features correlated with malignant ductal lesions. However, multivariate logistic regression showed that only microcalcification (OR = 8.96, P = 0.047) and enhancement scope (enlarged, OR = 27.42, P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for predicting malignant ductal lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under the ROC curve of microcalcifications combined with an enlarged enhancement scope were 0.895, 0.886, 0.872, 0.907, 0.890, and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Microcalcification and enlarged enhancement scope are independent factors for predicting malignant ductal lesions. The combined diagnosis can greatly improve the diagnostic performance, indicating that CEUS can be useful in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions to formulate more appropriate management for ductal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Di Yang
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xuan Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - XuanTong Gong
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Tong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jie Han
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - YinPeng Ren
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - ShuangMei Zou
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Yong Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhak S, Baliski C, Bakos B. Factors influencing suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision following breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ. Am J Surg 2023; 225:866-870. [PMID: 36894415 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Re-excisions following breast conserving surgery (BCS) are common, occurring more frequently in ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) than its' malignant counterpart. Although one quarter of patients with breast cancer will have DCIS, there is limited information available regarding factors predisposing to inadequate pathologic margins, and the need for re-excision. METHODS Retrospective review of patients treated for DCIS between the years 2010-2016 was conducted. Patients with DCIS undergoing BCS were identified and evaluated for demographic and pathologic factors associated with suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision. Multivariate analysis with Wald Chi-Square testing was performed. RESULTS 241 patients underwent BCS with suboptimal margins (SOM) in 51.7% (123/238), with 27.8% undergoing re-excision (67/241). Tumor size was the most influential variable, positively associated with SOM (OR = 10.25, CI: 5.50-19.13) and re-excision (OR = 6.36, CI: 3.92-10.31). Patient age was inversely associated with SOM (OR = 0.58, CI: 0.39-0.85) and subsequent re-excisions (OR = 0.56, CI: 0.36-0.86). Low tumour grade was associated with re-excision (OR = 1.31, CI: 0.63-2.71), while ER negative disease was associated with SOM (OR = 2.24, CI: 1.21-4.14). DISCUSSION Inadequate pathologic margins following BCS, and subsequent re-excision rates are common in patients with DCIS, and consistent with the literature. Tumour size is the dominant factor driving this occurrence, with patient age and tumour grade also impacting outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahej Dhak
- University of British Columbia, Southern Medical Program, 1088 Discovery Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
| | - Christopher Baliski
- BC Cancer Sindi-Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for the Southern Interior, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC V1Y 5L3, Canada.
| | - Brendan Bakos
- BC Cancer Sindi-Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for the Southern Interior, 399 Royal Ave, Kelowna, BC V1Y 5L3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mehta TS, Lourenco AP, Niell BL, Bennett DL, Brown A, Chetlen A, Freer P, Ivansco LK, Jochelson MS, Klein KA, Malak SF, McCrary M, Mullins D, Neal CH, Newell MS, Ulaner GA, Moy L. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Breast Surgery. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S341-S356. [PMID: 36436961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Given that 20% to 40% of women who have percutaneous breast biopsy subsequently undergo breast surgery, knowledge of imaging women with a history of benign (including high-risk) disease or breast cancer is important. For women who had surgery for nonmalignant pathology, the surveillance recommendations are determined by their overall risk. Higher-than-average risk women with a history of benign surgery may require screening mammography starting at an earlier age before 40 and may benefit from screening MRI. For women with breast cancer who have undergone initial excision and have positive margins, imaging with diagnostic mammography or MRI can sometimes guide additional surgical planning. Women who have completed breast conservation therapy for cancer should get annual mammography and may benefit from the addition of MRI or ultrasound to their surveillance regimen. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejas S Mehta
- Director of Diversity, Equity Inclusion and Population Health in Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worchester, Massachusetts.
| | - Ana P Lourenco
- Panel Chair; Residency Program Director, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bethany L Niell
- Panel Vice-Chair; Section Chief of Breast Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Commission Government Relations Chair
| | - Debbie L Bennett
- Section Chief - Breast Imaging, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology/Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Ann Brown
- Assistant Section Chief, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Alison Chetlen
- Vice Chair of Education, Division Chief Breast Imaging, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Phoebe Freer
- Section Chief, Breast Imaging, University of Utah/Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah; ACR/SCBI Screening Leadership Group Inaugural Class
| | - Lillian K Ivansco
- Assistant Chief, Department of Radiology, Section Chief for Breast Imaging and Quality, Co-Chair, Breast Imaging Sourcing and Standards Team, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maxine S Jochelson
- Chief of the Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Marion McCrary
- Associate Director of Duke GME Coaching, Duke Signature Care, Durham, North Carolina; American College of Physicians; Governor-Elect, American College of Physicians, North Carolina Chapter
| | - David Mullins
- Chief of Staff, Princeton Community Hospital, Princeton, West Virginia; American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Mary S Newell
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; RADS Committee
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Linda Moy
- Specialty Chair, NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pandey M, Wen PX, Ning GM, Xing GJ, Wei LM, Kumar D, Mayuren J, Candasamy M, Gorain B, Jain N, Gupta G, Dua K. Intraductal delivery of nanocarriers for ductal carcinoma in situ treatment: a strategy to enhance localized delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2022; 17:1871-1889. [PMID: 36695306 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2022-0234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ describes the most commonly occurring, noninvasive malignant breast disease, which could be the leading factor in invasive breast cancer. Despite remarkable advancements in treatment options, poor specificity, low bioavailability and dose-induced toxicity of chemotherapy are the main constraint. A unique characteristic of nanocarriers may overcome these problems. Moreover, the intraductal route of administration serves as an alternative approach. The direct nanodrug delivery into mammary ducts results in the accumulation of anticancer agents at targeted tissue for a prolonged period with high permeability, significantly decreasing the tumor size and improving the survival rate. This review focuses mainly on the intraductal delivery of nanocarriers in treating ductal carcinoma in situ, together with potential clinical translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Pandey
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, 123031, India
| | - Pung Xiau Wen
- School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| | - Giam Mun Ning
- School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| | - Gan Jia Xing
- School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| | - Liu Man Wei
- School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| | - Dinesh Kumar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, 123031, India
| | - Jayashree Mayuren
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| | - Mayuren Candasamy
- Department of Life Sciences, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
| | - Bapi Gorain
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Technology, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, 835215, India
| | - Neha Jain
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University, Noida, India
| | - Gaurav Gupta
- School of Pharmacy, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jagatpura, Jaipur, 302017, India.,Department of Pharmacology, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, 602105, India.,Uttaranchal Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, 248007, India
| | - Kamal Dua
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Australian Research Centre in Complementary & Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu F, Cao L, Xu C, Cai G, Cai R, Qi W, Wang S, Shen K, Chai W, Chen J. A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Prognosis and Tailoring Local Therapy Decision for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ after Breast Conserving Surgery. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175188. [PMID: 36079116 PMCID: PMC9456583 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to explore the role of nomogram-combined biomarkers, mammographic microcalcification and inflammatory hematologic markers in guiding local therapy decisions in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subgroups with different ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) risk. Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2018, consecutive patients with DCIS and breast conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled and randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 181) and internally validation cohort (n = 78). Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of IBTR. Model performance was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. The time-to-event curves were calculated by the Kaplan−Meier methods and compared by the log-rank test. Results: In total, 259 patients were enrolled and 182 of them received whole breast irradiation (WBI). After a median follow-up of 51.02 months, 23 IBTR events occurred in the whole cohort. By multivariate analyses of training cohort, presence of microinvasion, Ki67 index >14%, mammographic-clustered fine linear microcalcifications and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio before BCS (preop-NLR), >1.1 remained independent risk factors of IBTR to develop a nomogram. The C-indexes of the nomogram were 0.87 and 0.86 in the training and internal validation set, respectively. Calibration plots illustrated good agreement between the predictions and actual observations for 5-year IBTR. Cut-off values of nomogram point were identified as 53 and 115 points, which divided all patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Significant differences in IBTR existed between low-, intermediate- and high-risk subgroups (p < 0.01). For the whole cohort and ER-positive tumours, the benefit of WBI was found only in the intermediate-risk subgroup, but not in those with low or high risk. Fourteen out of 23 IBTRs occurred outside the original quadrant and all occurred in the high-risk group. Conclusions: The novel nomogram demonstrated potential to separate the risk of IBTR and locations of IBTR. For the whole cohort and ER-positive tumours, the benefit of WBI was restricted to an intermediate-risk subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feifei Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Lu Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Gang Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Rong Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Weixiang Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Shubei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Kunwei Shen
- Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Weimin Chai
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20025, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-021-64370045; Fax: +86-021-64156886
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee SE, Kim GR, Han K, Kim EH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Yoon JH, Park VY, Moon HJ. US, Mammography, and Histopathologic Evaluation to Identify Low Nuclear Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. Radiology 2022; 303:276-284. [PMID: 35166586 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Low nuclear grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) identified at biopsy can be upgraded to intermediate to high nuclear grade DCIS at surgery. Methods that confirm low nuclear grade are needed to consider nonsurgical approaches for these patients. Purpose To develop a preoperative model to identify low nuclear grade DCIS and to evaluate factors associated with low nuclear grade DCIS at biopsy that was not upgraded to intermediate to high nuclear grade DCIS at surgery. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, 470 women (median age, 50 years; interquartile range, 44-58 years) with 477 pure DCIS lesions at surgical histopathologic evaluation were included (January 2010 to December 2015). Patients were divided into the training set (n = 330) or validation set (n = 147) to develop a preoperative model to identify low nuclear grade DCIS. Features at US (mass, nonmass) and at mammography (morphologic characteristics, distribution of microcalcification) were reviewed. The upgrade rate of low nuclear grade DCIS was calculated, and multivariable regression was used to evaluate factors for associations with low nuclear grade DCIS that was not upgraded later. Results A preoperative model that included lesions manifesting as a mass at US without microcalcification and no comedonecrosis at biopsy was used to identify low nuclear grade DCIS, with a high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.00) in the validation set. The upgrade rate of low nuclear grade DCIS at biopsy was 38.8% (50 of 129). Ki-67 positivity (odds ratio, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.0003, 0.43; P = .005) was inversely associated with constant low nuclear grade DCIS. Conclusion The upgrade rate of low nuclear grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at biopsy to intermediate to high nuclear grade DCIS at surgery occurred in more than a third of patients; low nuclear grade DCIS at final histopathologic evaluation could be identified if the mass was viewed at US without microcalcifications and had no comedonecrosis at histopathologic evaluation of biopsy. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Rahbar in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Eun Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Ga Ram Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Eun Hwa Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Eun-Kyung Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Min Jung Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Jung Hyun Yoon
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Vivian Youngjean Park
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| | - Hee Jung Moon
- From the Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea (S.E.L., E.K.K.); Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiologic Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K., K.H., M.J.K., J.H.Y., V.Y.P.); Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (E.H.K.); and Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea (H.J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee SE, Kim HY, Yoon JH, Kim EK, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim GR, Park YV, Moon HJ. Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8699-8709. [PMID: 34196861 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10378-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because no prior studies have evaluated the chronological trends of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) despite the increasing number of surgeries performed for DCIS, this study analyzed how the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic characteristics of DCIS changed during a 10-year period. METHODS Of 7123 patients who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at a single institution from 2006 to 2015, 792 patients with pure DCIS were included in this study. The chronological trends of age, symptoms, method for detecting either mammography or ultrasonography, tumor size, nuclear grade, comedonecrosis, and molecular markers were calculated using Poisson regression for all patients and asymptomatic patients. RESULTS During 10 years, DCIS surgery rates significantly increased (p < 0.001). Despite the high percentage of DCIS detected on mammography, the detection rate for DCIS by mammography significantly decreased (97.3% in 2006 to 67.6% in 2015; p = 0.025), whereas the detection rate by ultrasound significantly increased (2.7% to 31.0%; p < 0.001). Conservation surgery rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.058), low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates (OR, 1.069), and the absence of comedonecrosis (OR, 1.104) significantly increased over time (all p < 0.05). Estrogen receptor (ER) negativity (OR, 0.935) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity rates (OR, 0.953) significantly decreased (all p < 0.05). The same trends were observed for the 613 asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION The rate of DCIS detected on ultrasound only significantly increased during 10 years. Low-to-intermediate nuclear grade rates significantly increased, whereas ER negativity and HER2 positivity rates significantly decreased during the same period. These findings suggest that DCIS detected on screening ultrasound is less aggressive than DCIS detected on mammography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Ha Yan Kim
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Kyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Jee Ye Kim
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Jung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ga Ram Kim
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngjean Vivian Park
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Jung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fowler AM. Survival Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in the Era of Supplemental Screening. Radiology 2019; 292:49-50. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M. Fowler
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wis; and Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis
| |
Collapse
|