Preoperative CT features for characterization of vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters in hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To explore the capability of preoperative CT imaging features, in combination with clinical indicators, for predicting vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC) pattern and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2015 to May 2022, patients with HCC who underwent curative resection and preoperative enhanced CT were retrospectively included. Clinical indicators and imaging featuresassociated with the VETC pattern were determined by logistic regression analyses. The early recurrence (ER) rate was determined using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Factors associated with ER after surgical resection were identified by Cox regression analyses.

RESULT

A total of 243 patients with HCCwere evaluated. The total bilirubin > 17.1 μmol/L (odds ratio [OR] 3.43, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 1.70, 6.91, p = 0.001), serum α-fetoprotein > 100 ng/mL (OR 2.41, 95 % CI 1.25, 4.67, p = 0.009), intratumor artery (IA) (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.04, 3.86,p = 0.039) and arterial peritumoral enhancement (OR 2.60, 95 % CI 1.13, 5.96, p = 0.025) were independent risk factors for VETC+-HCC. The VETC+status andCT feature ofIA were associated with an increased risk of recurrence, with a shorter median RFS, compared to those without these factors (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019, respectively). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the VETC+(hazard ratio [HR] 2.60, 95 % CI 1.66, 4.09, p < 0.001), morphological patterns of confluent multinodular growth (HR 1.79, 95 % CI 1.10, 2.91,p = 0.019), the number of the tumors (≥2) (HR 2.69, 95 % CI 1.56, 4.65, p < 0.001), and the IA (HR 1.73, 95 % CI 1.12, 2.66, p = 0.013) were independent predictors of ER in patients with HCC after surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CT features combined with clinical indicators could predict VETC pattern, and the CT features, along with VETC status, were of prognostic significance for early postoperative recurrence in patients with HCC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Preoperative CT features combined with clinical indicators could predict VETC pattern, and the CT features, along with VETC status, were of prognostic significance for early recurrence in patients with HCC after surgical resection.

Inter-reader agreement for CT/MRI LI-RADS category M imaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

To systematically evaluate inter-reader agreement in the assessment of individual liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) imaging features in computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) LIRADS v2018, and to explore the causes of poor agreement in LR-M assignment.

METHODS

Original studies reporting inter-reader agreement for LR-M features on multiphasic CT or MRI were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The pooled kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In total, 24 eligible studies with 5,163 hepatic observations were included. The pooled κ values were 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.78) for rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.39-0.65) for peripheral washout, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50-0.70) for delayed central enhancement, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.78) for targetoid restriction, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83) for targetoid transitional phase/hepatobiliary phase appearance, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.49-0.78) for infiltrative appearance, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30-0.68) for marked diffusion restriction, and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.48-0.73) for necrosis or severe ischemia. Substantial study heterogeneity was observed for all LR-M features (Cochran's Q test, P<0.01; I2≥89.2%). Studies with a mean observation size of <3 cm, those performed using 1.5-T MRI, and those with multiple image readers, were significantly associated with poor agreement of LR-M features.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement for peripheral washout and marked diffusion restriction was limited. The LI-RADS should focus on improving the agreement of LR-M features.

Performance of LI-RADS category 5 vs combined categories 4 and 5: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) category 5 has high specificity and modest sensitivity for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of LR-5 vs combined LR-4 and LR-5 (LR-4/5) for HCC diagnosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through January 03, 2023 were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 and combined LR-4/5 for HCC diagnosis, using CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation diagnostic performance. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies (15,108 observations, 9928 (65.7%) HCCs) were included. Compared to LR-5, combined LR-4/5 showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (83.0% (95% CI [80.3-85.8%]) vs 65.7% (95% CI [62.4-69.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled specificity (75.0% (95% CI [70.5-79.6%]) vs 91.7% (95% CI [90.2-93.1%]); p < 0.001), lower pooled positive likelihood ratio (3.60 (95% CI [3.06-4.23]) vs 6.18 (95% CI [5.35-7.14]); p < 0.001), and lower pooled negative likelihood ratio (0.22 (95% CI [0.19-0.25]) vs 0.38 (95% CI [0.35-0.41]) vs; p < 0.001). Similar results were seen in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that combining LR-4 and LR-5 would increase sensitivity but decrease specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio. These findings may inform management guidelines and individualized management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This meta-analysis estimated the magnitude of changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria when LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 were combined; these findings can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

KEY POINTS

There is no single worldwide reporting system for liver imaging, partly due to regional needs. Combining LI-RADS categories 4 and 5 increased sensitivity and decreased specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Changes in the sensitivity and specificity of imaging criteria can inform management guidelines and individualized management.

Systematic training of LI-RADS CT v2018 improves interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions

AIM

To retrospectively explored whether systematic training in the use of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 on computed tomography (CT) can improve the interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions (FLLs) among different radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 18 visiting radiologists and the liver multiphase CT images of 70 hepatic observations in 63 patients at high risk of HCC were included in this study. The LI-RADS v2018 training procedure included three thematic lectures, with an interval of 1 month. After each seminar, the radiologists had 1 month to adopt the algorithm into their daily work. The interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for FLLs among the radiologists before and after training were compared.

RESULTS

After training, the interobserver agreements in classifying the LR categories for all radiologists were significantly increased for most LR categories (P < 0.001), except for LR-1 (P = 0.053). After systematic training, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for LR categorization performance for all participants were significantly increased for most LR categories (P < 0.001), except for LR-1 (P = 0.062).

CONCLUSION

Systematic training in the use of the LI-RADS can improve the interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for FLLs among radiologists with different levels of experience.

A Modified Targetoid Feature Emphasizing Thin-Rim APHE to Improve the Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS for Malignant Hepatic Tumors

Objective

To identify imaging features that help distinguish between HCCs and non-HCC malignancies assigned to LI-RADS M (LR-M) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of a LI-RADS with targetoid criteria using thin-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE).

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 381 patients (387 observations) at high-risk for HCC who underwent enhanced-MRI before surgery. Three radiologists reviewed images for LI-RADS categorization of hepatic observations. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to determine reliable features to differentiate between HCC and non-HCC malignancies among the LR-M lesions. The thin-rim (<30%) APHE was defined based on the thickest thickness of rim APHE compared with the tumor radius, and a modified LI-RADS emphasizing thin-rim APHE as a specific feature of LR-M was established. We compared the diagnostic performance of modified LR-M and LI-RADS 5 (LR-5) with the conventional one.

Results

Thin-rim APHE and targetoid diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were found as independent predictive factors of non-HCC malignancies, while enhancing capsule, thick-rim APHE and peripheral washout were noted as independent variables significantly associated with HCC of LR-M (P<0.05). The noticeable diagnostic performance of thin-rim APHE in distinguishing non-HCC malignancies from HCCs using the ROC curve. Emphasizing thin-rim APHE on targetoid features, the modified LR-M revealed significantly superior specificity and accuracy (89.4% vs 81.1%, P=0.004; and 87.9% vs 82.2%, P=0.027, respectively) while maintaining high sensitivity (82.2% vs 86.0%; P=0.529) compared with the LR-M. Meanwhile, the modified LR-5 achieved greater sensitivity and accuracy (88.6% vs 79.7%, P=0.004; and 85.8% vs 80.1%, P=0.036, respectively) for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity (78.3% vs.81.1%; P=0.608) compared with the LR-5.

Conclusion

Thin-rim APHE may be the specific imaging feature for differentiating non-HCC malignancies from HCCs within LR-M. The modified targetoid criteria emphasizing thin-rim APHE can improve the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for hepatic malignancies.

Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 category 5 for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We performed an updated meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) 5 category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018), and to evaluate differences by imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the performance of LR-5 using v2018 for diagnosing HCC. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analysis was performed based on imaging modalities and type of MRI contrast material.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies qualified for the meta-analysis, comprising 9031 patients, 10,547 observations, and 7216 HCCs. The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC were 66% (95% CI, 61-70%) and 91% (95% CI, 89-93%), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, MRI with extracellular agent (ECA-MRI) showed significantly higher pooled sensitivity (77% [95% CI, 70-82%]) than CT (66% [95% CI, 58-73%]; p = 0.023) or MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI) (65% [95% CI, 60-70%]; p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference between ECA-MRI and MRI with gadobenate (gadobenate-MRI) (73% [95% CI, 61-82%]; p = 0.495). Pooled specificities were 88% (95% CI, 80-93%) for CT, 92% (95% CI, 86-95%) for ECA-MRI, 93% (95% CI, 91-95%) for Gx-MRI, and 91% (95% CI, 84-95%) for gadobenate-MRI without significant differences (p = 0.084-0.803).

CONCLUSIONS

LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material, while ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT or Gx-MRI.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Refinement of the criteria for improving sensitivity while maintaining high specificity of LR-5 for HCC diagnosis may be an essential future direction.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled per-observation sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC using LI-RADSv2018 were 66% and 91%, respectively. • ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity than CT (77% vs 66%, p = 0.023) or Gx-MRI (77% vs 65%, p = 0.001). • LI-RADS v2018 LR-5 provides high specificity (88-93%) for HCC diagnosis regardless of modality or contrast material type.

Feeding artery: a valuable feature for differentiation of regenerative nodule, dysplastic nodules and small hepatocellular carcinoma in CEUS LI-RADS

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the feeding artery (FA) feature can aid in discriminating small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) from precancerous lesions.

METHODS

Between June 2017 and May 2021, a total of 347 patients with 351 precancerous liver lesions or small HCCs who underwent CEUS were enrolled. Two independent radiologists assigned LI-RADS categories to all lesions and assessed the presence of the FA feature, which was used as an ancillary feature to either upgrade or downgrade the LI-RADS category. The diagnostic performance of CEUS LI-RADS, both with and without the FA feature, was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

RESULTS

The FA feature was found to be more prevalent in HCC (85.54%, p < 0.001) than in regenerative nodules (RNs, 29.73%), low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDNs, 33.33%), and high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs, 55.26%). Furthermore, the presence of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout (WO), and FA in liver nodules was associated with a higher expression of GPC-3 and Ki-67 compared to the group without these features (p < 0.001). After adjusting, the sensitivity and accuracy of LR-5 for HCC improved from 68.67% (95%CI: 62.46%, 74.30%) to 77.51% (95%CI: 71.72%, 82.44%) and from 69.23% (95%CI: 64.11%, 74.02%) to 73.79% (95%CI: 68.86%, 78.31%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The FA feature is a valuable feature for distinguishing small HCC and precancerous lesions and could be added as a possible ancillary feature in CEUS LI-RADS which was backed up by biomarkers.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The presence of a feeding artery is a valuable imaging feature in the differentiation of HCC and precancerous lesions. Incorporating this characteristic in the CEUS LI-RADS can enhance the diagnostic ability.

KEY POINTS

• Feeding artery is more frequent in HCC than in regenerative nodules, low-grade dysplastic nodules, and high-grade dysplastic nodules. • Feeding artery feature is a valuable ancillary feature for CEUS LI-RADS to differentiate regenerative nodules, low-grade dysplastic nodules, high-grade dysplastic nodules, and HCC. • The existence of feeding artery, arterial phase hyperenhancement, and washout is associated with more GPC-3 positive expression and higher Ki-67 expression than the group without these features.

Evidence Supporting Diagnostic Value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Based on the Liver Imaging Data and Reporting System (LI-RADS) guidelines, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed using imaging criteria in patients at risk of HCC.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of LI-RADS in high-risk patients with HCC.

Material and Methods

This systematic review is conducted on international databases, including Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, PROQUEST, and Cochrane Library, with appropriate keywords. Using the binomial distribution formula, the variance of each study was calculated, and all the data were analyzed using STATA version 16. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined using a random-effects meta-analysis approach. Also, we used the chi-squared test and I2 index to calculate heterogeneity among studies, and Funnel plots and Egger tests were used for evaluating publication bias.

Results

The pooled sensitivity was estimated at 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). According to different types of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS), the highest pooled sensitivity was in version 2018 (0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) (I2: 80.6%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001). The pooled specificity was estimated as 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.92). According to different types of LI-RADS, the highest pooled specificity was in version 2014 (93.0 (95% CI 89.0-96.0) (I2: 81.7%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001).

Conclusion

LI-RADS can assist radiologists in achieving the required sensitivity and specificity in high-risk patients suspected to have HCC. Therefore, this strategy can serve as an appropriate tool for identifying HCC.

Association of LI-RADS and Histopathologic Features with Survival in Patients with Solitary Resected Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background Both Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and histopathologic features provide prognostic information in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but whether LI-RADS is independently associated with survival is uncertain. Purpose To assess the association of LI-RADS categories and features with survival outcomes in patients with solitary resected HCC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with solitary resected HCC from three institutions examined with preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI between January 2008 and December 2019. Three independent readers evaluated the LI-RADS version 2018 categories and features. Histopathologic features including World Health Organization tumor grade, microvascular and macrovascular invasion, satellite nodules, and tumor capsule were recorded. Overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed with Cox regression models. Marginal effects of nontargetoid features on survival were estimated using propensity score matching. Results A total of 360 patients (median age, 64 years [IQR, 56-70 years]; 280 male patients) were included. At CT and MRI, the LI-RADS LR-M category was associated with increased risk of recurrence (CT: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.83 [95% CI: 1.26, 2.66], P = .001; MRI: HR = 2.22 [95% CI: 1.56, 3.16], P < .001) and death (CT: HR = 2.47 [95% CI: 1.72, 3.55], P < .001; MRI: HR = 1.80 [95% CI: 1.32, 2.46], P < .001) independently of histopathologic features. The presence of at least one nontargetoid feature was associated with an increased risk of recurrence (CT: HR = 1.80 [95% CI: 1.36, 2.38], P < .001; MRI: HR = 1.93 [95% CI: 1.81, 2.06], P < .001) and death (CT: HR = 1.51 [95% CI: 1.10, 2.07], P < .010) independently of histopathologic features. In matched samples, recurrence was associated with the presence of at least one nontargetoid feature at CT (HR = 2.06 [95% CI: 1.15, 3.66]; P = .02) or MRI (HR = 1.79 [95% CI: 1.01, 3.20]; P = .048). Conclusion In patients with solitary resected HCC, LR-M category and nontargetoid features were negatively associated with survival independently of histopathologic characteristics. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kartalis and Grigoriadis in this issue.

A multi-center diagnostic system for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma based on preoperative MRI and clinical features

OBJECTIVES

To establish a non-invasive diagnostic system for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) via decision tree analysis.

METHODS

Totally 1008 patients with 504 pathologically confirmed IMCCs and proportional hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinomas (cHCC-CC) from multi-centers were retrospectively included (internal cohort n = 700, external cohort n = 308). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to evaluate the independent clinical and MRI predictors for IMCC, and the selected features were used to develop a decision tree-based diagnostic system. Diagnostic efficacy of the established system was calculated by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the internal training-testing and external validation cohorts, and also in small lesions  ≤ 3 cm.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that female, no chronic liver disease or cirrhosis, elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, normal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, lobulated tumor shape, progressive or persistent enhancement pattern, no enhancing tumor capsule, targetoid appearance, and liver surface retraction were independent characteristics favoring the diagnosis of IMCC over HCC or cHCC-CC (odds ratio = 3.273-25.00, p < 0.001 to p = 0.021). Among which enhancement pattern had the highest weight of 0.816. The diagnostic system incorporating significant characteristics above showed excellent performance in the internal training (area under the curve (AUC) 0.971), internal testing (AUC 0.956), and external validation (AUC 0.945) cohorts, as well as in small lesions  ≤ 3 cm (AUC 0.956).

CONCLUSIONS

In consideration of the great generalizability and clinical efficacy in multi-centers, the proposed diagnostic system may serve as a non-invasive, reliable, and easy-to-operate tool in IMCC diagnosis, providing an efficient approach to discriminate IMCC from other HCC-containing primary liver cancers.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study established a non-invasive, easy-to-operate, and explainable decision tree-based diagnostic system for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, which may provide essential information for clinical decision-making.

KEY POINTS

• Distinguishing intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) from other primary liver cancers is important for both treatment planning and outcome prediction. • The MRI-based diagnostic system showed great performance with satisfying generalization ability in the diagnosis and discrimination of IMCC. • The diagnostic system may serve as a non-invasive, easy-to-operate, and explainable tool in the diagnosis and risk stratification for IMCC.

Radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma does not preclude biopsy before treatment

Background & Aims

The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis relies on non-invasive criteria based on international guidelines. The advent of systemic therapies warrants reconsideration of the role of biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of HCC. Accordingly, we investigated the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS 2018 and the AASLD 2011 criteria.

Methods

Consecutive patients with cirrhosis who underwent a biopsy for suspected HCC between 2015 and 2020 were included. The available imaging studies (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging) were blindly reviewed by two independent radiologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed for LI-RADS, AASLD, and biopsies.

Results

In total, 167 patients underwent both available biopsy and imaging. Of the 137 relevant biopsies, 114 patients had HCC (83.2%), 12 (9%) had non-HCC malignant lesions, and 11 (8%) had benign nodules. The PPV and NPV of the biopsies were 100% and 62%, respectively; 30 biopsies were non-contributive. The PPV and NPV of the LI-RADS categories were 89% and 32.8% for LR-5 and 85.5% and 54.5% for LR-4 + 5 + TIV, respectively. The PPV and NPV of the 2011 AASLD criteria were 93.2% and 35.6%, respectively. The interobserver kappa (k = 0.380) for the LR-5 categories was reasonable. Of 100 LR-5 nodules, 11 were misclassified, in particular one case was a colorectal metastasis, and two cases were cholangiocarcinomas, of which nine were identified through biopsy, whereas six were correctly classified according to LI-RADS (LR-M or LR-TIV). Fifty percent of macrotrabecular HCC and 48.4% of poorly differentiated HCC (Edmonson 3 and 4) were not classified as LR-5.

Conclusions

LI-RADS 2018 did not outperform the AASLD 2011 score as a non-invasive diagnosis of HCC. Tumor biopsy allowed restoration of an accurate diagnosis in 11% of LR-5 cases. A combined radiological and histological diagnosis should be considered mandatory for good treatment assessment.

Impact and Implications

Although biopsy is not required for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis when the LI-RADS criteria are met according to current guidelines, our study underscores the limits of radiology and the need for biopsy when hepatocellular carcinoma is suspected. Histological findings could change therapeutics of liver tumors even if only for a small proportion of patients. Histological proof of the type of cancer is a standard in oncology.

Threshold growth has a limited role in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from other focal hepatic lesions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of threshold growth, as one of the major features (MFs) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is inconsistent. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance for HCC when threshold growth was removed or replaced by independently significant ancillary features (AFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included patients with a high HCC risk who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs. The MRI findings were consistent with pathologically proven focal hepatic observations. The pathological results were used as the gold standard reference. The sizes of the lesions with and without threshold growth were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to confirm the independently significant AFs of HCC. In addition to the classification criteria of LI-RADS version 2018 (LI-RADS v2018), the lesions were also reclassified according to the following two schemes: scheme A, using all MFs except threshold growth, with threshold growth feature treated as an AF favouring malignancy; and scheme B, replacing the threshold growth feature with independently significant AFs and treated them as new MFs. The diagnostic performance of the above two LI-RADS schemes for HCC was calculated and compared with that of LI-RADS v2018. RESULTS: A total of 379 patients and 426 observations were included. Threshold growth was not an independent significant MF for HCC diagnosis [odds ratio (OR), 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-1.8; p = 0.927]. For all three groups of observations (HCCs, non-HCC malignancies, and benign lesions), the mean size with threshold growth was smaller than that without threshold growth (all p < 0.05). The nodule-in-nodule feature was an independent significant AF (OR, 9.8; 95% CI, 1.2-79.3; p = 0.032) and was used to replace threshold growth as a new MF in scheme B. The sensitivities of schemes A and B were 74.0% and 75.6%, respectively. The specificities of schemes A and B were the same (88.6%). None of the diagnostic performance metrics for HCC (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) of either scheme A or B was significantly different from those of LI-RADS v2018 (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Threshold growth is not an independently significant MF for HCC diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for HCC is not affected regardless of whether threshold growth is removed from the list of MFs or replaced with an independently significant and more HCC-specific AF, which is the nodule-in-nodule feature.

Chemoembolization Plus Ablation: Current Status

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The treatment landscape for HCC has evolved significantly over the past decade, with several modalities available to treat various stages of disease. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system provides a foundation for treatment guidance. However, given the complex nature of HCC, a more nuanced approach is often required, especially for lesions sized between 3 and 5 cm. This review aims to analyze the available treatments for early-stage HCC lesions between 3 and 5 cm, with a focus on the therapeutic potential and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)-ablation. Additional therapies including TACE, ablation, transarterial radioembolization, and surgical resection are also reviewed and compared with TACE-ablation. TACE-ablation is a viable therapeutic option for early-stage HCC lesions between 3 and 5 cm. Surgical resection remains the gold standard. Although recent studies suggest radiation segmentectomy may be a curative approach for this patient population, further studies are needed to compare the relative efficacies between TACE-ablation and radiation segmentectomy.

Update on Locoregional Therapies for Liver Cancer: Radiation Segmentectomy

Over 900,000 people worldwide were diagnosed with liver cancer in 2022 alone, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for 75-85% of cases. Treatment for HCC includes some combination of systemic therapies, surgery, liver transplantation, ablation, and intra-arterial therapies with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Currently, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines have acknowledged liver transplantation, surgical resection, and thermal ablation as curative therapies in very early to early stage HCC (BCLC-0 and BCLC-A). While these modalities are the preferred curative treatments for a very early to early stage disease, there are challenges associated with these options, such as organ availability and patient eligibility. Current data shows the role of radiation segmentectomy as a curative therapeutic option for very early to early stage HCC that is unresectable and not amenable to ablation. As future data continues to elucidate the ability for radiation segmentectomy to achieve complete pathologic necrosis, the goal is for the BCLC staging model to acknowledge its role as a curative treatment in this patient population and incorporate it into the ever-evolving guidelines.

A Reliable and Repeatable Model for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The reproducibility of imaging models for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains questionable due to inconsistent interpretation of image signs. Our aim was to screen for high-consensus MRI features to develop a repeatable model for predicting MVI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 219 patients with HCC who underwent surgical resection, and patients were divided into a training cohort (n = 145) and a validation cohort (n = 74). Morphological characteristics, signal features on hepatobiliary phases, and dynamic enhancement patterns were qualitatively interobserver evaluated. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Cohen's κ for selecting features with high interobserver agreement. Risk factors that were significant in stepwise multivariate analysis and that could be measured with good interobserver agreement were used to construct a predictive model, which was assessed in the validation cohort. The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified nonsmooth tumor margin, absence of radiologic capsule, and intratumoral artery as independent risk factors of MVI. These MRI-based features showed good or nearly perfect interobserver agreement between radiologists (κ > 0.6). The predictive model predicted MVI well in the training (AUC 0.734) and validation cohorts (AUC 0.759) and fitted well to calibration curves.

CONCLUSION

MRI features included nonsmooth tumor margin, absence of radiologic capsule, and intratumoral artery that can be assessed with high interobserver agreement can predict MVI in HCC patients. The predictive model described here may be useful to radiologists, regardless of experience level.

Comparison of noncontrast, dynamic, and hepatobiliary phase abbreviated MRI protocols for detection of hepatic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Abbreviated MRI for surveillance in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently gained interest.

PURPOSE

To compare the performance among the three types of abbreviated MRI protocols for the detection of hepatic malignancies in patients at risk for HCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective review using data from a prospective-registry study included 221 patients with one or more hepatic nodules detected during surveillance for chronic liver disease. Patients underwent MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI) and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) before surgery. Sequences from each MRI were extracted to create three simulated abbreviated MRI (aMRI) sets: noncontrast aMRI (NC-aMRI), dynamic aMRI (Dyn-aMRI), and hepatobiliary phase aMRI (HBP-aMRI). Two readers evaluated each set and reported the probability of malignancy and possibility of non-HCC malignancy per lesion. Using the pathology report as reference, the diagnostic performance of each aMRI was compared.

RESULTS

This study included 289 observations (219 HCCs, 22 non-HCC malignancies, and 48 benign lesions). Defining category definite malignancy as test positive, the performance of each aMRI was as follows: sensitivity, 94.6%, 88.8%, and 92.5%; and specificity, 83.3%, 91.7%, and 85.4% for HBP-aMRI, Dyn-aMRI, and NC-aMRI, respectively. Pairwise comparison revealed higher sensitivity of HBP-aMRI than both Dyn-aMRI (P = 0.003) and NC-aMRI (P = 0.025), and higher specificity of Dyn-aMRI than HBP-aMRI (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

HBP-aMRI showed better sensitivity than Dyn-aMRI or NC-aMRI, whereas the sensitivity of NC-aMRI was comparable to Dyn-aMRI in the detection of malignancy in high-risk patients. Dyn-aMRI showed better specificity than HBP-aMRI.

A Multicenter Assessment of Interreader Reliability of LI-RADS Version 2018 for MRI and CT

Background Various limitations have impacted research evaluating reader agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Purpose To assess reader agreement of LI-RADS in an international multicenter multireader setting using scrollable images. Materials and Methods This retrospective study used deidentified clinical multiphase CT and MRI and reports with at least one untreated observation from six institutions and three countries; only qualifying examinations were submitted. Examination dates were October 2017 to August 2018 at the coordinating center. One untreated observation per examination was randomly selected using observation identifiers, and its clinically assigned features were extracted from the report. The corresponding LI-RADS version 2018 category was computed as a rescored clinical read. Each examination was randomly assigned to two of 43 research readers who independently scored the observation. Agreement for an ordinal modified four-category LI-RADS scale (LR-1, definitely benign; LR-2, probably benign; LR-3, intermediate probability of malignancy; LR-4, probably hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]; LR-5, definitely HCC; LR-M, probably malignant but not HCC specific; and LR-TIV, tumor in vein) was computed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Agreement was also computed for dichotomized malignancy (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M, and LR-TIV), LR-5, and LR-M. Agreement was compared between research-versus-research reads and research-versus-clinical reads. Results The study population consisted of 484 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 10 [SD]; 156 women; 93 CT examinations, 391 MRI examinations). ICCs for ordinal LI-RADS, dichotomized malignancy, LR-5, and LR-M were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.73), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.70), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.66), and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.61) respectively. Research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical agreement for modified four-category LI-RADS (ICC, 0.68 vs 0.62, respectively; P = .03) and for dichotomized malignancy (ICC, 0.63 vs 0.53, respectively; P = .005), but not for LR-5 (P = .14) or LR-M (P = .94). Conclusion There was moderate agreement for LI-RADS version 2018 overall. For some comparisons, research-versus-research reader agreement was higher than research-versus-clinical reader agreement, indicating differences between the clinical and research environments that warrant further study. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorials by Johnson and Galgano and Smith in this issue.

Optimizing CT and MRI criteria for differentiating intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) is crucial with regard to the choice of patient management and treatment options.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS M (LR-M) targetoid criteria on computed tomography (CT) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) in differentiating IMCC from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 118 patients with IMCC and HCC were included who underwent CT and EOB-MRI examinations. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the strongest predictors differentiating IMCC from HCC. Using these predictors, a predictive model for differentiating IMCC from HCC was constructed and the performance of the model was confirmed using the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses revealed rim-like arterial phase hyperenhancement (rim APHE) on CT and rim APHE, delayed central enhancement (DCE), and targetoid hepatobiliary phase (HBP) on MRI as independent variables significantly differentiating IMCC from HCC. The multivariate logistic regression model incorporating the three variables on EOB-MRI was constructed with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.946, sensitivity of 87.80%, specificity of 92.21%, and accuracy of 94.60%. Per the DeLong test, the multivariate logistic regression model showed significantly higher AUC than rim APHE on CT (0.946 vs. 0.871; P = 0.008) and MRI (0.946 vs. 0.876; P = 0.003), whereas rim APHE on CT and MRI did not differ significantly (P = 0.809).

CONCLUSION

The multivariate logistic regression model based on rim APHE, DCE, and targetoid HBP on EOB-MRI can effectively distinguish IMCC from HCC and is superior to any other targetoid appearance criterion of LI-RADS on CT and EOB-MRI.

Percentages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LI-RADS Categories with CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT and MRI algorithm applies equally to CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI), and MRI with gadoxetate (Gx-MRI). Purpose To estimate pooled percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall malignancy for each LI-RADS category with CT and MRI. Materials and Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for research articles (January 2014-April 2021) reporting the percentages of observations in each LI-RADS category with use of versions 2014, 2017, or 2018. Study design, population characteristics, imaging modality, reference standard, and numbers of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in each category were recorded. A random-effects model evaluated the pooled percentage of HCC and overall malignancy for each category. Results There were 49 studies with 9620 patients and a total 11 562 observations, comprising 7921 HCCs, 1132 non-HCC malignancies, and 2509 benign entities. No HCC or non-HCC malignancies were reported with any modality in the LR-1 category. The pooled percentages of HCC for CT, ECA-MRI, and Gx-MRI, respectively, were 10%, 6%, and 1% for LR-2 (P = .16); 48%, 31%, and 38% for LR-3 (P = .42); 76%, 64%, and 77% for LR-4 (P = .62); 96%, 95%, and 96% for LR-5 (P = .76); 88%, 76%, and 78% for LR-5V or LR-TIV (tumor in vein) (P = .42); and 20%, 30%, and 35% for LR-M (P = .32). Most LR-M (93%-100%) and LR-5V or LR-TIV (99%-100%) observations were malignant, regardless of modality. Conclusion There was no difference in percentages of hepatocellular carcinoma and overall malignancy between CT, MRI with extracellular contrast agents, and MRI with gadoxetate for any Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categories. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Ronot in this issue.

Prognosis of Primary Liver Cancer Based on LI-RADS Classification with Extracellular Agent-Enhanced MRI

Objective

The prognostic value of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 2018 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other primary liver cancers (PLC) with cirrhosis is unclear. We aim to evaluate the value of LI-RADS 2018 with agent-enhanced MRI in the postoperative prognosis of PLC patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

Between 2016 and 2021, 432 patients with cirrhosis and surgically proven single primary liver cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Two radiologists evaluated the preoperative MRI features independently and assigned each lesion a LI-RADS category. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and their associated factors were evaluated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, Log rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The mean age of 432 patients (239 HCCs, 93 ICCs, and 100 cHCC-CCAs) was 57.27±10.92 years. The LR-M category showed poorer OS and RFS than the LR-4 or LR-5 category did for all primary liver cancers (P <0.001 for both), and so did HCCs with tumor size less than 30mm (P =0.003 and P =0.04, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, the LI-RADS category and tumor size > 30 mm had independent correlations with OS and RFS (all P < 0.05). Multivariable Cox analysis identified rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) as independent determinants of poor OS and RFS in primary liver cancers (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The LI-RADS categories can predict the postsurgical prognosis of primary liver cancers independently.

Efficacy of LR-5 and LR-4/5 by Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (MRI) for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

To comprehensive investigate the diagnostic efficacy of LR-5 and LR-4/5 by MRI LI-RADS of suspected liver nodules. A comprehensive search of authenticated international databases including PubMed/Medline, Ovid, Embase, Web of Science as well as a series of nation-level databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure was carried out to look for related studies with respect to the diagnostic performance of MRI LR-5 or LR-4/5 for HCC. Subsequently, main data including the basic information of the articles incorporated as well as main outcomes, including diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or original data like true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative values were extracted. Next, forest plots were generated to reveal the pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity of LR-5 and LR-4/5 by LI-RADS were comparatively satisfactory. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MRI LR-5 with respect to pathologically diagnosed HCC were 0.73 [95% CI 0.7-0.75] and 0.88 [95% CI 0.86-0.90] respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI LR-4/5 were 0.77 [95% CI 0.75-0.80] and 0.82 [95% CI 0.79-0.85] respectively. Through this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a promisingly satisfactory diagnostic efficacy of LR-5 and LR-4/5 by MRI LI-RADS of suspected malignant liver nodules, manifested by optimal diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

[CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS): Standardization, Evidence, and Future Direction]

The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) has been developed with the support of the American College of Radiology to standardize the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018 has been incorporated in the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guidance. This review examines the effect of CT/MRI LI-RADS on the standardized reporting of liver imaging, and the evidence in diagnosing HCC and evaluating treatment response after locoregional treatment using CT/MRI LI-RADS. The results are compared with other HCC diagnosis guidelines, and future directions are described.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common cancers worldwide and represents a major global health-care challenge. Although viral hepatitis and alcohol remain important risk factors, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is rapidly becoming a dominant cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. A broad range of treatment options are available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, including liver transplantation, surgical resection, percutaneous ablation, and radiation, as well as transarterial and systemic therapies. As such, clinical decision making requires a multidisciplinary team that longitudinally adapts the individual treatment strategy according to the patient's tumour stage, liver function, and performance status. With the approval of new first-line agents and second-line agents, as well as the establishment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies as standard of care, the treatment landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is more diversified than ever. Consequently, the outlook for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma has improved. However, the optimal sequencing of drugs remains to be defined, and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to inform treatment selection. In this Seminar, we present an update on the causes, diagnosis, molecular classification, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

LI-RADS Version 2018 Targetoid Appearances on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance for the Differentiation of HCC and Non-HCC Malignancy

BACKGROUND. In LI-RADS version 2018, observations showing at least one of five targetoid appearances in different sequences or postcontrast phases are categorized LR-M, indicating likely non-hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignancy. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver agreement for LI-RADS targetoid appearances among a large number of radiologists of varying experience and the diagnostic performance of targetoid appearances for differentiating HCC from non-HCC malignancy. METHODS. This retrospective study included 100 patients (76 men, 24 women; mean age, 58 ± 9 [SD] years) at high risk of HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI within 30 days before hepatic tumor resection (25 randomly included patients with non-HCC malignancy [13, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; 12, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma]; 75 matched patients with HCC). Eight radiologists (four more experienced [8-15 years]; four less experienced [1-5 years]) from seven institutions independently assessed observations for the five targetoid appearances and LI-RADS categorization. Interobserver agreement and diagnostic performance for non-HCC malignancy were evaluated. RESULTS. Interobserver agreement was poor for peripheral washout (κ = 0.20); moderate for targetoid transitional phase or hepatobiliary phase appearance (κ = 0.33), delayed central enhancement (κ = 0.37), and targetoid restriction (κ = 0.43); and substantial for rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (κ = 0.61). Agreement was fair for at least one targetoid appearance (κ = 0.36) and moderate for at least two, three, or four targetoid appearances (κ = 0.43-0.51). Agreement for individual targetoid appearances was not significantly different between more experienced and less experienced readers other than for targetoid restriction (κ = 0.63 vs 0.43; p = .001). Agreement for at least one targetoid appearance was fair among more experienced (κ = 0.29) and less experienced (κ = 0.37) reviewers. Agreement for at least two, three, or four targetoid appearances was moderate to substantial among more experienced reviewers (κ = 0.45-0.63) and moderate among less experienced reviewers (κ = 0.42-0.56). Existing LR-M criteria of at least one targetoid appearance had median accuracy for non-HCC malignancy of 62%, sensitivity of 84%, and specificity of 54%. For all reviewers, accuracy was highest when at least three (median accuracy, 79%; sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 82%) or four (median accuracy, 80%; sensitivity, 54%; specificity, 88%) targetoid appearances were required. CONCLUSION. Targetoid appearances and LR-M categorization exhibited considerable interobserver variation among both more and less experienced reviewers. CLINICAL IMPACT. Requiring multiple targetoid appearances for LR-M categorization improved interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy for non-HCC malignancy.

A Narrative Review on LI-RADS Algorithm in Liver Tumors: Prospects and Pitfalls

Liver cancer is the sixth most detected tumor and the third leading cause of tumor death worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy with specific risk factors and a targeted population. Imaging plays a major role in the management of HCC from screening to post-therapy follow-up. In order to optimize the diagnostic-therapeutic management and using a universal report, which allows more effective communication among the multidisciplinary team, several classification systems have been proposed over time, and LI-RADS is the most utilized. Currently, LI-RADS comprises four algorithms addressing screening and surveillance, diagnosis on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diagnosis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and treatment response on CT/MRI. The algorithm allows guiding the radiologist through a stepwise process of assigning a category to a liver observation, recognizing both major and ancillary features. This process allows for characterizing liver lesions and assessing treatment. In this review, we highlighted both major and ancillary features that could define HCC. The distinctive dynamic vascular pattern of arterial hyperenhancement followed by washout in the portal-venous phase is the key hallmark of HCC, with a specificity value close to 100%. However, the sensitivity value of these combined criteria is inadequate. Recent evidence has proven that liver-specific contrast could be an important tool not only in increasing sensitivity but also in diagnosis as a major criterion. Although LI-RADS emerges as an essential instrument to support the management of liver tumors, still many improvements are needed to overcome the current limitations. In particular, features that may clearly distinguish HCC from cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and combined HCC-CCA lesions and the assessment after locoregional radiation-based therapy are still fields of research.

Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Primary Liver Cancer in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis on Enhanced MRI

Purpose

The study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from primary liver cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis based on the updated 2019 WHO classification.

Materials and Methods

From 2016 to 2021, 300 patients with surgically confirmed primary liver cancer (PLC) and liver cirrhosis based on the updated 2019 WHO classification were eligible for this retrospective study (100 cases in each of three groups including HCC, ICC, and cHCC-CCA). Two radiologists were blinded to the final diagnosis and independently assigned an LI-RADS category to each liver nodule. The diagnostic performances of the LR-5 category (definitely HCC), and the LR-M category (probably or definitely malignant, but not specific for HCC) were calculated in overall and small observations (<20 mm). Comparisons between groups of categorical variables were performed by one-way analysis of variance and the Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

The mean age of 300 patients (226 men and 74 women) was 57.40 ± 11.05 years. The sensitivity and specificity of the LR-5 category for differentiating HCCs from other primary liver cancers were 81% (81 of 100) and 82% (164 of 200), respectively. The LR-M category had a sensitivity of 63% (126 of 200) for diagnosing non-HCCs (ICCs and cHCC-CCAs), with a specificity of 90% (90 of 100). The LR-5 category had a sensitivity of 82.5% (33 of 40) for diagnosing HCCs in small observations (<20 mm) with a specificity of 76.6% (59 of 77). On the contrary, LR-M demonstrated slightly higher specificity (93.8%) and sensitivity (73.8%) for diagnosing non-HCCs with tumor size <20 mm.

Conclusion

The LR-5 category as well as the LR-M category of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 can effectively distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from other primary hepatic malignancies in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially for small observations (<20 mm).

Atypical Manifestation of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatic Malignancy Mimicking Lesions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively on multiphasic CT and MRI based on its distinctive imaging findings. These features include arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, radiologists face significant diagnostic challenges because some HCCs exhibit atypical imaging characteristics. In addition to many HCC-mimicking lesions, such as arterioportal shunts, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hemangioma present a challenge for radiologists in actual clinical practice. The ability to distinguish HCCs from mimickers on initial imaging examinations is crucial for appropriate management and treatment decisions. Therefore, this pictorial review presents the imaging findings of atypical HCCs and HCCs mimicking malignant and benign lesions and discusses important clues that may help narrow down the differential diagnosis.

Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 on CT for Determining Eligibility for Liver Transplant According to Milan Criteria in Patients at High Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND. LI-RADS has been investigated primarily in terms of detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with less attention given to its performance, particularly on CT, in determining eligibility for liver transplant (LT). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to assess the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018) on CT for the diagnosis of HCC and determination of LT eligibility according to the Milan criteria (MC). METHODS. This retrospective study included 136 patients (110 men, 26 women; mean age, 53.9 ± 8.1 [SD] years) at high-risk for HCC who underwent liver protocol CT within 3 months before LT between January 2010 and December 2018. Two radiologists independently reviewed CT examinations using LI-RADS v2018; Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) classes were constructed from the LI-RADS interpretations. Histopathologic analysis of liver explants served as the reference standard for determining the presence of HCC and LT eligibility based on MC. Diagnostic performance was evaluated. Overall survival (OS) was assessed based on medical record review. RESULTS. Based on histopathologic evaluation of liver explants in the 136 patients, 27 patients had no malignancy, 77 were eligible for LT due to HCC within MC, and 32 were unsuitable for LT (i.e., HCC beyond MC in 16 patients, HCC with macrovascular invasion in 12, non-HCC malignancy in four). LR-5 exhibited per-lesion sensitivity and PPV for HCC of 55.9% and 92.8%, respectively, for reader 1 and 39.8% and 86.5% for reader 2. When considering LR-5 observations to represent HCC in assessing MC, LI-RADS had accuracy for determining LT eligibility of 92.7% for reader 1 and 85.3% for reader 2; OPTN criteria had accuracy for determining LT eligibility of 89.0% for reader 1 and 84.4% for reader 2. Five-year OS for patients within MC versus 5-year OS for patients unsuitable for LT was 92.2 months versus 56.0 months for LI-RADS, 92.6 months versus 47.6 months for OPTN criteria, and 93.3 months versus 55.1 months for histopathologic assessment of liver explants. CONCLUSION. LI-RADS v2018, as evaluated on CT in high-risk patients, shows high PPV for HCC detection and high accuracy for determining LT eligibility based on MC. LT eligibility based on preoperative LI-RADS evaluation is associated with post-LT survival. CLINICAL IMPACT. These findings support the use of LI-RADS on CT in assessing eligibility in patients who are candidates for LT.

A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based multivariable model using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To identify imaging features of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC) using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features and to develop a gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI)-based model for pretreatment prediction of MTM-HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 93 patients with pathologically proven HCC (39 MTM-HCC and 54 non-MTM-HCC) were retrospectively evaluated with EOB-MRI at 3 T. Imaging analysis according to LI-RADS v2018 was evaluated by two readers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors for MTM-HCC. Different logistic regression models were built based on MRI features, including model A (enhancing capsule, blood products in mass and ascites), model B (enhancing capsule and ascites), model C (blood products in mass and ascites), and model D (blood products in mass and enhancing capsule). Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

After multivariate analysis, absence of enhancing capsule (odds ratio = 0.102, p = 0.010), absence of blood products in mass (odds ratio = 0.073, p = 0.030), and with ascites (odds ratio = 55.677, p = 0.028) were identified as independent differential factors for the presence of MTM-HCC. Model A yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 35.90% (21.20,52.80), 94.44% (84.60, 98.80), and 0.731 (0.629, 0.818). Model A achieved a comparable AUC than model D (0.731 vs. 0.699, p = 0.333), but a higher AUC than model B (0.731 vs. 0.644, p = 0.048) and model C (0.731 vs. 0.650, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The EOB-MRI-based model is promising for noninvasively predicting MTM-HCC and may assist clinicians in pretreatment decisions.

New strategy for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M to improve diagnostic performance of MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine a new strategy for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category M (LR-M) criteria to improve the diagnosis of HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A total of 463 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations ≤ 3.0 cm (375 HCCs, 32 other malignancies, 56 benignities) in 384 patients at risk of HCC who underwent gadoxetate-enhanced MRI were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists evaluated the presence of major, ancillary, and LR-M features according to LI-RADS v2018. Of the ten LR-M features, those significantly associated with non-HCC malignancy were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis, and new LR-M criteria for improving the diagnosis of HCC were investigated. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC using the new LR-M criteria with values calculated using the original LR-M criteria. p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

RESULTS

Of ten LR-M features, rim arterial-phase hyperenhancement, delayed central enhancement, targetoid restriction, and targetoid transitional-phase/hepatobiliary-phase appearance were independently significantly associated with non-HCC malignancy (adjusted odds ratio ≥ 6.2; p ≤ 0.02). Using the new LR-M criteria (two or more of these significant features), the sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC was higher than that with the original LR-M criteria (69% [95% confidence interval 64-73%] vs. 65% [61-70%], p = 0.002), whereas the specificity was similar (90% [82-95%] vs. 92% [83-96%], p = 0.28).

CONCLUSION

The new LR-M criteria (two or more significant features) can improve the sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm, without compromising specificity.

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: What the Multidisciplinary Team Should Know

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare type of primary liver malignancy. Among the risk factors, hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections, cirrhosis, and male gender are widely reported. The clinical appearance of cHCC-CCA is similar to that of HCC and iCCA and it is usually silent until advanced states, causing a delay of diagnosis. Diagnosis is mainly based on histology from biopsies or surgical specimens. Correct pre-surgical diagnosis during imaging studies is very problematic and is due to the heterogeneous characteristics of the lesion in imaging, with overlapping features of HCC and CCA. The predominant histological subtype within the lesion establishes the predominant imaging findings. Therefore, in this scenario, the radiological findings characteristic of HCC show an overlap with those of CCA. Since cHCC-CCAs are prevalent in patients at high risk of HCC and there is a risk that these may mimic HCC, it is currently difficult to see a non-invasive diagnosis of HCC. Surgery is the only curative treatment of HCC-CCA. The role of liver transplantation (LT) in the treatment of cHCC-CCA remains controversial, as is the role of ablative or systemic therapies in the treatment of this tumour. These lesions still remain challenging, both in diagnosis and in the treatment phase. Therefore, a pre-treatment imaging diagnosis is essential, as well as the identification of prognostic factors that could stratify the risk of recurrence and the most adequate therapy according to patient characteristics.

Conventional, functional and radiomics assessment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

This paper offers an assessment of diagnostic tools in the evaluation of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

Several electronic datasets were analysed to search papers on morphological and functional evaluation in ICC patients. Papers published in English language has been scheduled from January 2010 to December 2021.

Results

We found that 88 clinical studies satisfied our research criteria. Several functional parameters and morphological elements allow a truthful ICC diagnosis. The contrast medium evaluation, during the different phases of contrast studies, support the recognition of several distinctive features of ICC. The imaging tool to employed and the type of contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging, extracellular or hepatobiliary, should change considering patient, departement, and regional features. Also, Radiomics is an emerging area in the evaluation of ICCs.

Post treatment studies are required to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of therapies so as the patient surveillance.

Conclusions

Several morphological and functional data obtained during Imaging studies allow a truthful ICC diagnosis.

CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) assigns a risk category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to imaging observations. Establishing the contributions of major features can inform the diagnostic algorithm. Purpose To perform a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to establish the probability of HCC for each LI-RADS major feature using CT/MRI and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) LI-RADS in patients at high risk for HCC. Materials and Methods Multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched for studies from January 2014 to September 2019 that evaluated the accuracy of CT, MRI, and CEUS for HCC detection using LI-RADS (CT/MRI LI-RADS, versions 2014, 2017, and 2018; CEUS LI-RADS, versions 2016 and 2017). Data were centralized. Clustering was addressed at the study and patient levels using mixed models. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were determined for each major feature using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42020164486). Results A total of 32 studies were included, with 1170 CT observations, 3341 MRI observations, and 853 CEUS observations. At multivariable analysis of CT/MRI LI-RADS, all major features were associated with HCC, except threshold growth (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 0.7, 3.6; P = .07). Nonperipheral washout (OR, 13.2; 95% CI: 9.0, 19.2; P = .01) and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (OR, 10.3; 95% CI: 6.7, 15.6; P = .01) had stronger associations with HCC than enhancing capsule (OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.5; P = .03). On CEUS images, APHE (OR, 7.3; 95% CI: 4.6, 11.5; P = .01), late and mild washout (OR, 4.1; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6; P = .01), and size of at least 20 mm (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.5; P = .04) were associated with HCC. Twenty-five studies (78%) had high risk of bias due to reporting ambiguity or study design flaws. Conclusion Most Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System major features had different independent associations with hepatocellular carcinoma; for CT/MRI, arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout had the strongest associations, whereas threshold growth had no association. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[Small hepatocellular carcinoma : Diagnostics according to guidelines and established in the clinical setting]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-especially the characterization of small lesions <2 cm-continues to be a radiological challenge.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

In the current S3 guideline on diagnosis and therapy of HCC, contrast-enhanced imaging examinations, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are still the diagnostic standard.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

HCC in the cirrhotic liver should be diagnosed by its typical contrast-enhanced pattern in the MRI. In addition, the use of quality assurance instruments such as LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) contributes to the desired consistency of findings, even with small ambiguous findings.

PERFORMANCE

Many studies have shown that the LI-RADS classification reflects the likelihood of HCC and other malignant liver lesions.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Guidelines and quality assurance instruments contribute to a more precise diagnosis in patients with suspected HCC.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

A guideline-compliant diagnostic algorithm and the LI-RADS should be used across the board for accurate HCC diagnostics.

MRI-diagnosis of category LR-M observations in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We performed a meta-analysis to determine the probability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-HCC malignancies in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category M (LR-M) observations and the frequency of defined LR-M imaging features on MRI using LI-RADS v2018.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify studies published from 1 January 2018 to 16 March 2021 reporting the probability of category LR-M in HCC and non-HCC malignancies on MRI. The pooled percentages of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in the LR-M observations were evaluated. Meta-regression analysis was performed to identify factors for study heterogeneity. The frequencies of defined LR-M imaging features were also calculated. Risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies reporting the diagnostic performance of the LR-M category (3,812 observations in 3,615 patients), with nine studies reporting the frequencies of LR-M imaging features. The pooled percentages of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in the LR-M observations were 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21-38%) and 67% (95%CI, 57-77%), respectively. The study type and inclusion of benign lesions were significant factors for study heterogeneity. Of the 10 LR-M imaging features, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) showed the highest frequency in non-HCC malignancies (68%; 95%CI, 61-75%).

CONCLUSIONS

The LR-M category was commonly used to characterize non-HCC malignancies, but also included 29% of HCC. The frequencies of the different LR-M imaging features were variable, with rim APHE showing the highest frequency in non-HCC malignancies.

KEY POINTS

• In the LR-M category using LI-RADS v2018 for MRI, the pooled percentage of malignancies in general was 96%, with 29% HCC and 67% non-HCC malignancies, while the remaining 4% was benign entity. • The study type and inclusion of benign lesions were significant factors contributing to substantial heterogeneity among included studies. • The frequencies of the different LR-M imaging features were variable, with rim APHE showing the highest frequency in non-HCC malignancies.

The Course of LIRADS 3 and 4 Hepatic Abnormalities as Correlated With Explant Pathology: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Liver Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is the standard classification of imaging findings of hepatic abnormalities for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. We aimed to study the course of LI-RADS 3 and 4 (LR-3 and LR-4) abnormalities through correlations with explant pathology.

METHODS

A single center retrospective study of liver transplant recipients between January 2016 and September 2019 with HCC on explant pathology was conducted. Eligible patients were divided into three subgroups based on their LI-RADS classification: LR-3/4, LR-5 only, and combination of LR-3/4/5.

RESULTS

There were 116 eligible patients with 99 LR-3/4 observations (60 LR-3 and 39 LR-4); the rest had LR-5 lesions. LR-4 more often than LR-3 observations progressed to LR-5 (36% vs 12%) and with shorter duration during follow-up (median 175 days and 196 days). Mean size growth of LR-3 and LR-4 abnormalities were 2.6 and 3.8 mm; median growth rates were 0.2 and 0.4 mm/month, respectively. Numbers of HCC lesions per explant, largest HCC lesion size, and cumulative size were higher in LR-3/4/5 subgroup than LR-5 subgroup (P = 0.007, 0.007 and 0.006, respectively); 68% of LR-3 and 82% of LR-4 abnormalities were confirmed HCC on explant (P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Compared to LR-3, more LR-4 abnormalities progressed to LR-5 (12% and 36%, respectively) in a shorter time and with faster growth rate. A high proportion of LR-3 and LR-4 lesions (68% and 82%, respectively) were confirmed HCC on explant, raising the question of whether excluding HCC based on radiologic criteria alone is adequate in those with LR-3/4 abnormalities.

Accuracy of Various Forms of Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Contrast-enhanced MRI can be used to identify patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, studies around the world have found differing diagnostic accuracies for the technique. Hence, we designed this meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI for HCC diagnosis.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search for all studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI for HCC in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from inception until January 2021. We used the "Midas" package from the STATA software to perform the meta-analysis.

Results

Our study was based on 21 publications with 5,361 patients. The pooled HCC diagnosis sensitivity and specificity were 75% (95% CI, 70%-80%) and 90% (95% CI, 88%-92%), respectively, for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI; and they were 70% (95% CI, 57%-81%) and 94% (95% CI, 85%-97%), respectively, for MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI). We found significant heterogeneity with a significant chi-square test and an I ² statistic >75%. We also found significant publication bias as per Deeks' test results and funnel plot.

Conclusion

We found that both types of contrast-enhanced MRI are accurate diagnostic and surveillance tools for HCC and offer high sensitivity and specificity. Further studies on different ethnic populations are required to strengthen our findings.

Imaging Features at the Periphery: Hemodynamics, Pathophysiology, and Effect on LI-RADS Categorization

Liver lesions have different enhancement patterns at dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) applies the enhancement kinetic of liver observations in its algorithms for imaging-based diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in at-risk populations. Therefore, careful analysis of the spatial and temporal features of these enhancement patterns is necessary to increase the accuracy of liver mass characterization. The authors focus on enhancement patterns that are found at or around the margins of liver observations-many of which are recognized and defined by LI-RADS, such as targetoid appearance, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral washout, peripheral discontinuous nodular enhancement, enhancing capsule appearance, nonenhancing capsule appearance, corona enhancement, and periobservational arterioportal shunts-as well as peripheral and periobservational enhancement in the setting of posttreatment changes. Many of these are considered major or ancillary features of HCC, ancillary features of malignancy in general, features of non-HCC malignancy, features associated with benign entities, or features related to treatment response. Distinction between these different patterns of enhancement can help with achieving a more specific diagnosis of HCC and better assessment of response to local-regional therapy. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Hepatobiliary phase signal intensity: A potential method of diagnosing HCC with atypical imaging features among LR-M observations

Herein, we assessed whether hepatobiliary phase (HBP) signal intensity (SI) can be used to differentiate HCC and non-HCC malignancies within LR-M observations. 106 LR-M patients based on LI-RADS v2018 who underwent gadoxetate-disodium magnetic resonance imaging and surgery from January 2009 to December 2018 were included. SI of LR-M observation on HBP was analyzed by two radiologists and categorized into dark, low and iso-to-high groups. Tumor was classified as dark when more than 50% of tumor showed hypointensity compared to spleen, as low when more than 50% of tumor showed hyperintensity compared to spleen but hypointensity compared to liver parenchyma, and as iso-to-high if there was even a focal iso-intensity or hyperintensity compared to liver parenchyma. Analysis of clinicopathological factors and association between imaging and histology was performed. Out of 106 LR-M, 42 (40%) were showed dark, 61 (58%) showed low, and 3 (3%) showed iso-to-high SI in HBP. Three iso-to-high SI LR-M were HCCs (P = 0.060) and their major histologic differentiation was Edmondson grade 1 (P = 0.001). 43 out of 61 (71%) low SI LR-M were iCCA or cHCC-CCA (P = 0.002). Inter-reader agreement of HBP SI classification was excellent, with a kappa coefficient of 0.872. LR-M with iso-to-high SI in HBP is prone to being HCC while LR-M with low SI in HBP is prone to being tumor with fibrous stroma such as iCCA and cHCC-CCA. Classification of LR-M based on HBP SI may be a helpful method of differentiating HCC from non-HCC malignancies.

CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018 versus CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 in the diagnosis of primary hepatic nodules in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to explore the application value of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS version 2017 in high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and to conduct a comparative analysis.

Methods

This study enrolled 250 high-risk HCC patients with 259 primary hepatic nodules from June 2017 to June 2020. Two investigators used a single-blind method to classify all nodules. The u-test, t-test, and Kappa test were performed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value and receiver operating characteristic curves of LR-5 and LR-M in the diagnosis of HCC and non-HCC malignancy were respectively calculated.

Results

CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 showed substantial agreement inter-observers, and there was a moderate agreement inter-modality. The specificity and PPV of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in CT/MRI LR-5/M were higher than CEUS. The areas under the curve (AUC) of CT/MRI LR-5 and LR-M were 0.794 and 0.777, and the AUC of CEUS LR-5 and LR-M were 0.720 and 0.718, respectively.

Conclusions

Two modalities have substantial agreement inter-observers and moderate agreement inter-modalities. The diagnostic accuracy of HCC of CT/MRI LR-5 and non-HCC malignancy of CT/MRI LR-M are higher than CEUS.

A modified LI-RADS: targetoid tumors with enhancing capsule can be diagnosed as HCC instead of LR-M lesions

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate whether the presence of enhancing capsule can be applied to establish a modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC malignancies in extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced and hepatobiliary agent (HBA)-enhanced MRI.

METHODS

We enrolled 198 participants (161 men; mean age, 56.3 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI before surgery for de novo hepatic nodule(s). Two reviewers assigned LI-RADS categories (v2018). We defined a "modified LR-5 category, which emphasizes enhancing capsule (mLR-5C)" over targetoid features and classifies tumors with both targetoid appearance and enhancing capsule as HCC instead of LR-M. We compared the diagnostic performance of conventional LI-RADS and modified LI-RADS criteria for both MRIs.

RESULTS

A total of 258 hepatic nodules (194 HCCs, 43 benign lesions, and 21 non-HCC malignancies; median size, 19 mm) were analyzed. By conventional LI-RADS, 47 (18.2%) nodules (31 HCCs and 16 non-HCC malignancies) were categorized as LR-M. The mLR-5C criterion showed superior sensitivity (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%; both p < 0.05) while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05) compared with the LR-5 criterion. Using the mLR-5C criterion, ECA-MRI exhibited higher sensitivity than HBA-MRI (76.6% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.001) and similar specificity (93.8% vs. 95.3%, p > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Our modified LI-RADS achieved superior sensitivity for diagnosing HCC, without compromising specificity compared with LR-5. ECA-MRI showed higher sensitivity in diagnosing HCC than HBA-MRI by applying the mLR-5C for LR-M lesions.

KEY POINTS

• By conventional LI-RADS, 31 (16.0%) of 194 HCCs were categorized as LR-M. • Among 31 HCCs categorized as LR-M, 19 HCCs or 8 HCCs were recategorized as HCC on ECA-MRI or HBA-MRI, respectively, after applying the modified LR-5 category, which allocates targetoid lesions with enhancing capsule as mLR-5C instead of LR-M. • The mLR-5C showed superior sensitivity compared with the LR-5 in both MRIs (ECA-MRI, 76.6% vs. 67.0%; HBA-MRI, 60.4% vs. 56.3%, both p < 0.05), while maintaining high specificity (ECA-MRI, 93.8% vs. 98.4%; HBA-MRI, 95.3% vs. 98.4%; both p > 0.05).

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nonhepatocellular Malignancies in Chronic Liver Disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy associated with chronic liver disease. Nonhepatocellular malignancies may also arise in the setting of chronic liver disease. The imaging diagnosis of non-HCC malignancies may be challenging. Non-HCC malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease most commonly include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and less commonly hepatic lymphomas and metastases. On MR imaging, non-HCC malignancies often demonstrate a targetoid appearance, manifesting as rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, peripheral washout, central delayed enhancement, and peripheral restricted diffusion. When applying the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System algorithm, observations with targetoid appearance are categorized as LR-M.

How to Use LI-RADS to Report Liver CT and MRI Observations

Primary liver cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comprising the vast majority of primary liver malignancies. Imaging plays a central role in HCC diagnosis and management. As a result, the content and structure of radiology reports are of utmost importance in guiding clinical management. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) provides guidance for standardized reporting of liver observations in patients who are at risk for HCC. LI-RADS standardized reporting intends to inform patient treatment and facilitate multidisciplinary communication and decisions, taking into consideration individual clinical factors. Depending on the context, observations may be reported individually, in aggregate, or as a combination of both. LI-RADS provides two templates for reporting liver observations: in a single continuous paragraph or in a structured format with keywords and imaging findings. The authors clarify terminology that is pertinent to reporting, highlight the benefits of structured reports, discuss the applicability of LI-RADS for liver CT and MRI, review the elements of a standardized LI-RADS report, provide guidance on the description of LI-RADS observations exemplified with two case-based reporting templates, illustrate relevant imaging findings and components to be included when reporting specific clinical scenarios, and discuss future directions. An invited commentary by Yano is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA.

Diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatments assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma

This article provides an overview of diagnostic evaluation and ablation treatment assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Only studies, in the English language from January 2010 to January 202, evaluating the diagnostic tools and assessment of ablative therapies in HCC patients were included. We found 173 clinical studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria.HCC may be noninvasively diagnosed by imaging findings. Multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging is necessary to assess HCC. Intravenous extracellular contrast agents are used for CT, while the agents used for MRI may be extracellular or hepatobiliary. Both gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine may be used in hepatobiliary phase imaging. For treatment-naive patients undergoing CT, unenhanced imaging is optional; however, it is required in the post treatment setting for CT and all MRI studies. Late arterial phase is strongly preferred over early arterial phase. The choice of modality (CT, US/CEUS or MRI) and MRI contrast agent (extracelllar or hepatobiliary) depends on patient, institutional, and regional factors. MRI allows to link morfological and functional data in the HCC evaluation. Also, Radiomics is an emerging field in the assessment of HCC patients.Postablation imaging is necessary to assess the treatment results, to monitor evolution of the ablated tissue over time, and to evaluate for complications. Post- thermal treatments, imaging should be performed at regularly scheduled intervals to assess treatment response and to evaluate for new lesions and potential complications.

Enhancing capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma: intra-individual comparison between CT and MRI with extracellular contrast agent

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to that of magnetic resonance imaging obtained with extracellular contrast agent (ECA-MRI) for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using histopathologic findings as the standard of reference.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with pathologically-proven resected HCCs with available preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and ECA-MRI examinations. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed contrast-enhanced CT and ECA-MRI examinations to assess the presence of an enhancing capsule. The histopathological analysis of resected specimens was used as reference for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule. The sensitivity and specificity of CT and ECA-MRI for the diagnosis of a tumor capsule were determined, and an intra-individual comparison of imaging modalities was performed using McNemar test. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Kappa test.

RESULTS

The study population included 199 patients (157 men, 42 women; mean age: 61.3 ± 13.0 [SD] years) with 210 HCCs (mean size 56.7 ± 43.7 [SD] mm). A tumor capsule was present in 157/210 (74.8%) HCCs at histopathologic analysis. Capsule enhancement was more frequently visualized on ECA-MRI (R1, 68.6%; R2, 71.9%) than on CT (R1, 44.3%, P < 0.001; R2, 47.6%, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of ECA-MRI was better for the diagnosis of histopathological tumor capsule (R1, 76.4%; R2, 79.6%; P < 0.001), while CT had a greater specificity (R1, 84.9%; R2, 83.0%; P < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was moderate both on CT (kappa = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.66) and ECA-MRI (kappa = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.45-0.70).

CONCLUSION

Capsule enhancement was more frequently visualized on ECA-MRI than on CT. The sensitivity of ECA-MRI was greater than that of CT, but the specificity of CT was better than that of ECA-MRI.

Should Threshold Growth Be Considered a Major Feature in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using LI-RADS?

OBJECTIVE

Based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 (LI-RADS, v2018), this study aimed to analyze LR-5 diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when threshold growth as a major feature is replaced by a more HCC-specific ancillary feature, as well as the frequency of threshold growth in HCC and non-HCC malignancies and its association with tumor size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included treatment-naive patients who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRIs for focal hepatic lesions and surgery between January 2009 and December 2016. The frequency of major and ancillary features was evaluated for HCC and non-HCC malignancies, and the LR-category was assessed. Ancillary features that were significantly more prevalent in HCC were then used to either replace threshold growth or were added as additional major features, and the diagnostic performance of the readjusted LR category was compared to the LI-RADS v2018.

RESULTS

A total of 1013 observations were analyzed. Unlike arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, or enhancing capsule which were more prevalent in HCCs than in non-HCC malignancies (521/616 vs. 18/58, 489/616 vs. 19/58, and 181/616 vs. 5/58, respectively; p < 0.001), threshold growth was more prevalent in non-HCC malignancies than in HCCs (11/23 vs. 17/119; p < 0.001). The mean size of non-HCC malignancies showing threshold growth was significantly smaller than that of non-HCC malignancies without threshold growth (22.2 mm vs. 42.9 mm, p = 0.040). Similar results were found for HCCs; however, the difference was not significant (26.8 mm vs. 33.1 mm, p = 0.184). Additionally, Fat-in-nodule was more frequent in HCCs than in non-HCC malignancies (99/616 vs. 2/58, p = 0.010). When threshold growth and fat-in-nodule were considered as ancillary and major features, respectively, LR-5 sensitivity (73.2% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.289) and specificity (98.2% vs. 98.5%, p > 0.999) were comparable to the LI-RADS v2018.

CONCLUSION

Threshold growth is not a significant diagnostic indicator of HCC and is more common in non-HCC malignancies. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 was comparable when threshold growth was recategorized as an ancillary feature and replaced by a more HCC-specific ancillary feature.

A Nomogram Based on Combining Clinical Features and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound LI-RADS Improves Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSES

To establish a predictive model incorporating clinical features and contrast enhanced ultrasound liver imaging and reporting and data system (CEUS LI-RADS) for estimation of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

METHODS

In the retrospective study, 127 HCC patients from two hospitals were allocated as training cohort (n=98) and test cohorts (n=29) based on cutoff time-point, June 2020. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent indicators for developing predictive nomogram models. The area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was also determined to establish the diagnostic performance of different predictive models. Corresponding sensitivities and specificities of different models at the cutoff nomogram value were compared.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, clinical information (larger tumor size, higher AFP level) and CEUS LR-M were significantly correlated with the presence of MVI (all p<0.05). By incorporating clinical information and CEUS LR-M, the predictive model (LR-M+Clin) achieved a desirable diagnostic performance (AUC=0.80 and 0.84) in both cohorts at nomogram cutoff score value of 89. The sensitivity of LR-M+Clin when predicting MVI in HCC patients was higher than that of the clinical model alone (86.7% vs. 46.7%, p=0.027), while specificities were 78.6% and 85.7% (p=0.06), respectively, in the test cohort. In addition, LR-M+Clin exhibited similar AUC and specificity, but a significantly higher sensitivity (86.7%) than those of LR-M alone and LR-5(No)+Clin (both sensitivities=73.3%, both p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

The predictive model incorporating CEUS LR-M and clinical features was able to predict the MVI status of HCC and is a potential reliable preoperative tool for informing treatment.

Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in high-risk patients matched to MR field strength: diagnostic performance of LI-RADS version 2018

PURPOSE

To eliminate the effects of field strength in determining the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS version 2018 (LI-RADS v2018) in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC primary liver malignancy in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Patients who were pathologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) or combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with HCC were matched to the iCCA or cHCC-CCA patients on age, tumor size, MR scanner, and number of tumors. Two readers independently evaluated the lesions according to LI-RADS v2018. Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018 in differentiating HCC from non-HCC primary liver malignancy were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients with 204 lesions (102 HCCs, 78 iCCAs, and 24 cHCC-CCAs) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 or LR-TIV (definitely due to HCC) in diagnosing HCC were 68.63% and 85.29%, respectively. LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) had a sensitivity of 72.55% and a specificity of 86.27% in diagnosing non-HCC malignancy. The sensitivity of LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy) for iCCA and cHCC-CCA was 82.05% and 41.67%, respectively. Nearly half (11/24, 45.83%) of cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-5. Three tesla MR showed higher sensitivity than 1.5 T in diagnosing HCC (80.00% vs 57.69%, P = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

When the effect of field strength was eliminated, LI-RADS v2018 demonstrated high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity in distinguishing HCC from non-HCC primary liver carcinomas. Most iCCAs were categorized as LR-M or LR-TIV (may be due to non-HCC malignancy). However, nearly half of cHCC-CCAs were assigned as LR-5.

Imaging of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatic malignancy and is a heterogeneous tumor of biliary epithelium. We discuss the risk factors, anatomic classification of cholangiocarcinoma (CC) as well as the different morphologic subtypes of CC. Imaging findings of CC on different modalities are described, focusing on intrahepatic CC. Recently recognized imaging features that carry prognostic significance, such as a worse prognosis in tumors that have more desmoplastic stroma, are detailed. Other benign and malignant entities that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CC will also be discussed.