1
|
Winfree T, McCollough C, Yu L. Development and validation of a noise insertion algorithm for photon-counting-detector CT. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38923526 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inserting noise into existing patient projection data to simulate lower-radiation-dose exams has been frequently used in traditional energy-integrating-detector (EID)-CT to optimize radiation dose in clinical protocols and to generate paired images for training deep-learning-based reconstruction and noise reduction methods. Recent introduction of photon counting detector CT (PCD-CT) also requires such a method to accomplish these tasks. However, clinical PCD-CT scanners often restrict the users access to the raw count data, exporting only the preprocessed, log-normalized sinogram. Therefore, it remains a challenge to employ projection domain noise insertion algorithms on PCD-CT. PURPOSE To develop and validate a projection domain noise insertion algorithm for PCD-CT that does not require access to the raw count data. MATERIALS AND METHODS A projection-domain noise model developed originally for EID-CT was adapted for PCD-CT. This model requires, as input, a map of the incident number of photons at each detector pixel when no object is in the beam. To obtain the map of incident number of photons, air scans were acquired on a PCD-CT scanner, then the noise equivalent photon number (NEPN) was calculated from the variance in the log normalized projection data of each scan. Additional air scans were acquired at various mA settings to investigate the impact of pulse pileup on the linearity of NEPN measurement. To validate the noise insertion algorithm, Noise Power Spectra (NPS) were generated from a 30 cm water tank scan and used to compare the noise texture and noise level of measured and simulated half dose and quarter dose images. An anthropomorphic thorax phantom was scanned with automatic exposure control, and noise levels at different slice locations were compared between simulated and measured half dose and quarter dose images. Spectral correlation between energy thresholds T1 and T2, and energy bins, B1 and B2, was compared between simulated and measured data across a wide range of tube current. Additionally, noise insertion was performed on a clinical patient case for qualitative assessment. RESULTS The NPS generated from simulated low dose water tank images showed similar shape and amplitude to that generated from the measured low dose images, differing by a maximum of 5.0% for half dose (HD) T1 images, 6.3% for HD T2 images, 4.1% for quarter dose (QD) T1 images, and 6.1% for QD T2 images. Noise versus slice measurements of the lung phantom showed comparable results between measured and simulated low dose images, with root mean square percent errors of 5.9%, 5.4%, 5.0%, and 4.6% for QD T1, HD T1, QD T2, and HD T2, respectively. NEPN measurements in air were linear up until 112 mA, after which pulse pileup effects significantly distort the air scan NEPN profile. Spectral correlation between T1 and T2 in simulation agreed well with that in the measured data in typical dose ranges. CONCLUSIONS A projection-domain noise insertion algorithm was developed and validated for PCD-CT to synthesize low-dose images from existing scans. It can be used for optimizing scanning protocols and generating paired images for training deep-learning-based methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Winfree
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Lifeng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peters AA, Solomon JB, von Stackelberg O, Samei E, Alsaihati N, Valenzuela W, Debic M, Heidt C, Huber AT, Christe A, Heverhagen JT, Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Ebner L, Wielpütz MO. Influence of CT dose reduction on AI-driven malignancy estimation of incidental pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3444-3452. [PMID: 37870625 PMCID: PMC11126495 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10348-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of dose reduction on a commercially available lung cancer prediction convolutional neuronal network (LCP-CNN). METHODS CT scans from a cohort provided by the local lung cancer center (n = 218) with confirmed pulmonary malignancies and their corresponding reduced dose simulations (25% and 5% dose) were subjected to the LCP-CNN. The resulting LCP scores (scale 1-10, increasing malignancy risk) and the proportion of correctly classified nodules were compared. The cohort was divided into a low-, medium-, and high-risk group based on the respective LCP scores; shifts between the groups were studied to evaluate the potential impact on nodule management. Two different malignancy risk score thresholds were analyzed: a higher threshold of ≥ 9 ("rule-in" approach) and a lower threshold of > 4 ("rule-out" approach). RESULTS In total, 169 patients with 196 nodules could be included (mean age ± SD, 64.5 ± 9.2 year; 49% females). Mean LCP scores for original, 25% and 5% dose levels were 8.5 ± 1.7, 8.4 ± 1.7 (p > 0.05 vs. original dose) and 8.2 ± 1.9 (p < 0.05 vs. original dose), respectively. The proportion of correctly classified nodules with the "rule-in" approach decreased with simulated dose reduction from 58.2 to 56.1% (p = 0.34) and to 52.0% for the respective dose levels (p = 0.01). For the "rule-out" approach the respective values were 95.9%, 96.4%, and 94.4% (p = 0.12). When reducing the original dose to 25%/5%, eight/twenty-two nodules shifted to a lower, five/seven nodules to a higher malignancy risk group. CONCLUSION CT dose reduction may affect the analyzed LCP-CNN regarding the classification of pulmonary malignancies and potentially alter pulmonary nodule management. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Utilization of a "rule-out" approach with a lower malignancy risk threshold prevents underestimation of the nodule malignancy risk for the analyzed software, especially in high-risk cohorts. KEY POINTS • LCP-CNN may be affected by CT image parameters such as noise resulting from low-dose CT acquisitions. • CT dose reduction can alter pulmonary nodule management recommendations by affecting the outcome of the LCP-CNN. • Utilization of a lower malignancy risk threshold prevents underestimation of pulmonary malignancies in high-risk cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan A Peters
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Justin B Solomon
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Oyunbileg von Stackelberg
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ehsan Samei
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Njood Alsaihati
- Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Medical Physics Graduate Program, Clinical Imaging Physics Group, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Waldo Valenzuela
- University Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Manuel Debic
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Heidt
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adrian T Huber
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Christe
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johannes T Heverhagen
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of BioMedical Research, Experimental Radiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus P Heussel
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Ebner
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mark O Wielpütz
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou Z, Gong H, Hsieh S, McCollough CH, Yu L. Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38555876 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep-learning-based image reconstruction and noise reduction methods (DLIR) have been increasingly deployed in clinical CT. Accurate image quality assessment of these methods is challenging as the performance measured using physical phantoms may not represent the true performance of DLIR in patients since DLIR is trained mostly on patient images. PURPOSE In this work, we aim to develop a patient-data-based virtual imaging trial framework and, as a first application, use it to measure the spatial resolution properties of a DLIR method. METHODS The patient-data-based virtual imaging trial framework consists of five steps: (1) insertion of lesions into projection domain data using the acquisition geometry of the patient exam to simulate different lesion characteristics; (2) insertion of noise into projection domain data using a realistic photon statistical model of the CT system to simulate different dose levels; (3) creation of DLIR-processed images from projection or image data; (4) creation of ensembles of DLIR-processed patient images from a large number of noise and lesion realizations; and (5) evaluation of image quality using ensemble DLIR images. This framework was applied to measure the spatial resolution of a ResNet based deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) trained on patient images. Lesions in a cylindrical shape and different contrast levels (-500, -100, -50, -20, -10 HU) were inserted to the lower right lobe of the liver in a patient case. Multiple dose levels were simulated (50%, 25%, 12.5%). Each lesion and dose condition had 600 noise realizations. Multiple reconstruction and denoising methods were used on all the noise realizations, including the original filtered-backprojection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR), and the DCNN method with three different strength setting (DCNN-weak, DCNN-medium, and DCNN-strong). Mean lesion signal was calculated by performing ensemble averaging of all the noise realizations for each lesion and dose condition and then subtracting the lesion-present images from the lesion absent images. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) both in-plane and along the z-axis were calculated based on the mean lesion signals. The standard deviations of MTFs at each condition were estimated with bootstrapping: randomly sampling (with replacement) all the DLIR/FBP/IR images from the ensemble data (600 samples) at each condition. The impact of varying lesion contrast, dose levels, and denoising strengths were evaluated. Statistical analysis with paired t-test was used to compare the z-axis and in-plane spatial resolution of five algorithms for five different contrasts and three dose levels. RESULTS The in-plane and z-axis spatial resolution degradation of DCNN becomes more severe as the contrast or radiation dose decreased, or DCNN denoising strength increased. In comparison with FBP, a 59.5% and 4.1% reduction of in-plane and z-axis MTF (in terms of spatial frequencies at 50% MTF), respectively, was observed at low contrast (-10 HU) for DCNN with the highest denoising strength at 25% routine dose level. When the dose level reduces from 50% to 12.5% of routine dose, the in-plane and z-axis MTFs reduces from 92.1% to 76.3%, and from 98.9% to 95.5%, respectively, at contrast of -100 HU, using FBP as the reference. For most conditions of contrasts and dose levels, significant differences were found among the five algorithms, with the following relationship in both in-plane and cross-plane spatial resolution: FBP > DCNN-Weak > IR > DCNN-Medium > DCNN-Strong. The spatial resolution difference among algorithms decreases at higher contrast or dose levels. CONCLUSIONS A patient-data-based virtual imaging trial framework was developed and applied to measuring the spatial resolution properties of a DCNN noise reduction method at different contrast and dose levels using real patient data. As with other non-linear image reconstruction and post-processing techniques, the evaluated DCNN method degraded the in-plane and z-axis spatial resolution at lower contrast levels, lower radiation dose, and higher denoising strength.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongxing Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Hao Gong
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Scott Hsieh
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Lifeng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Pierpaoli L, Bruno A, Valeri T, Danti G, Bicci E, Gabelloni M, De Muzio F, Brunese MC, Bruno F, Palumbo P, Fusco R, Granata V, Gandolfo N, Miele V, Barile A, Giovagnoni A. Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach. Tomography 2023; 9:1153-1186. [PMID: 37368547 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9030095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This review has the purpose of illustrating schematically and comprehensively the key concepts for the beginner who approaches chest radiology for the first time. The approach to thoracic imaging may be challenging for the beginner due to the wide spectrum of diseases, their overlap, and the complexity of radiological findings. The first step consists of the proper assessment of the basic imaging findings. This review is divided into three main districts (mediastinum, pleura, focal and diffuse diseases of the lung parenchyma): the main findings will be discussed in a clinical scenario. Radiological tips and tricks, and relative clinical background, will be provided to orient the beginner toward the differential diagnoses of the main thoracic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Pierpaoli
- School of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- School of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Valeri
- School of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health, Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health, Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, 16149 Genoa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Svalkvist A, Fagman E, Vikgren J, Ku S, Diniz MO, Norrlund RR, Johnsson ÅA. Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13871. [PMID: 36583696 PMCID: PMC10018655 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The aims of the present study were to, for both a full-dose protocol and an ultra-low dose (ULD) protocol, compare the image quality of chest CT examinations reconstructed using TrueFidelity (Standard kernel) with corresponding examinations reconstructed using ASIR-V (Lung kernel) and to evaluate if post-processing using an edge-enhancement filter affects the noise level, spatial resolution and subjective image quality of clinical images reconstructed using TrueFidelity. METHODS A total of 25 patients were examined with both a full-dose protocol and an ULD protocol using a GE Revolution APEX CT system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA). Three different reconstructions were included in the study: ASIR-V 40%, DLIR-H, and DLIR-H with additional post-processing using an edge-enhancement filter (DLIR-H + E2). Five observers assessed image quality in two separate visual grading characteristics (VGC) studies. The results from the studies were statistically analyzed using VGC Analyzer. Quantitative evaluations were based on determination of two-dimensional power spectrum (PS), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and spatial resolution in the reconstructed patient images. RESULTS For both protocols, examinations reconstructed using TrueFidelity were statistically rated equal to or significantly higher than examinations reconstructed using ASIR-V 40%, but the ULD protocol benefitted more from TrueFidelity. In general, no differences in observer ratings were found between DLIR-H and DLIR-H + E2. For the three investigated image reconstruction methods, ASIR-V 40% showed highest noise and spatial resolution and DLIR-H the lowest, while the CNR was highest in DLIR-H and lowest in ASIR-V 40%. CONCLUSION The use of TrueFidelity for image reconstruction resulted in higher ratings on subjective image quality than ASIR-V 40%. The benefit of using TrueFidelity was larger for the ULD protocol than for the full-dose protocol. Post-processing of the TrueFidelity images using an edge-enhancement filter resulted in higher image noise and spatial resolution but did not affect the subjective image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelica Svalkvist
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Erika Fagman
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jenny Vikgren
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sara Ku
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Micael Oliveira Diniz
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rauni Rossi Norrlund
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Åse A Johnsson
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Inoue A, Johnson TF, Walkoff LA, Levin DL, Hartman TE, Burke KA, Rajendran K, Yu L, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG. Lung Cancer Screening Using Clinical Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography and Energy-Integrating-Detector Computed Tomography: A Prospective Patient Study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2023; 47:229-235. [PMID: 36573321 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic quality of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing lung cancer screening compared with conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT in a prospective multireader study. MATERIALS Patients undergoing lung cancer screening with conventional EID-CT were prospectively enrolled and scanned on a PCD-CT system using similar automatic exposure control settings and reconstruction kernels. Three thoracic radiologists blinded to CT system compared PCD-CT and EID-CT images and scored examinations using a 5-point Likert comparison score (-2 [left image is worse] to +2 [left image is better]) for artifacts, sharpness, image noise, diagnostic image quality, emphysema visualization, and lung nodule evaluation focusing on the border. Post hoc correction of Likert scores was performed such that they reflected PCD-CT performance in comparison to EID-CT. A nonreader radiologist measured objective image noise. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (mean, 66.9 ± 5.6 years; 11 female; body mass index; 30.1 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 ) were enrolled. Mean volume CT dose index for PCD-CT was lower (0.61 ± 0.21 vs 0.73 ± 0.22; P < 0.001). Pooled reader results showed significant differences between imaging modalities for all comparative rankings ( P < 0.001), with PCD-CT favored for sharpness, image noise, image quality, and emphysema visualization and lung nodule border, but not artifacts. Photon-counting detector CT had significantly lower image noise (74.4 ± 10.5 HU vs 80.1 ± 8.6 HU; P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Photon-counting detector CT with similar acquisition and reconstruction settings demonstrated improved image quality and less noise despite lower radiation dose, with improved ability to depict pulmonary emphysema and lung nodule borders compared with EID-CT at low-dose lung cancer CT screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akitoshi Inoue
- From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diagnostic Performance in Low- and High-Contrast Tasks of an Image-Based Denoising Algorithm Applied to Radiation Dose-Reduced Multiphase Abdominal CT Examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:73-85. [PMID: 35731096 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Anatomic redundancy between phases can be used to achieve denoising of multiphase CT examinations. A limitation of iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques is that they generally require use of CT projection data. A frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm applies denoising to the multiphase CT images themselves. This method does not require knowledge of the acquisition process or integration into the reconstruction system of the scanner, and it can be implemented as a supplement to commercially available IR algorithms. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the present study is to compare radiologists' performance for low-contrast and high-contrast diagnostic tasks (i.e., tasks for which differences in CT attenuation between the imaging target and its anatomic background are subtle or large, respectively) evaluated on multiphase abdominal CT between routine-dose images and radiation dose-reduced images processed by a frequency-split multiband-filtration denoising algorithm. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 47 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for known or suspected liver metastases (a low-contrast task) and 45 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for pancreatic cancer staging (a high-contrast task). Radiation dose-reduced images corresponding to dose reduction of 50% or more were created using a validated noise insertion technique and then underwent denoising using the frequency-split multi-band-filtration algorithm. Images were independently evaluated in multiple sessions by different groups of abdominal radiologists for each task (three readers in the low-contrast arm and four readers in the high-contrast arm). The noninferiority of denoised radiation dose-reduced images to routine-dose images was assessed using the jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) figure-of-merit (FOM; limit of noninferiority, -0.10) for liver metastases detection and using the Cohen kappa statistic and reader confidence scores (100-point scale) for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion. RESULTS. For liver metastases detection, the JAFROC FOM for denoised radiation dose-reduced images was 0.644 (95% CI, 0.510-0.778), and that for routine-dose images was 0.668 (95% CI, 0.543-0.792; estimated difference, -0.024 [95% CI, -0.084 to 0.037]). Intraobserver agreement for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion was substantial to near perfect when the two image sets were compared (κ = 0.53-1.00); the 95% CIs of all differences in confidence scores between image sets contained zero. CONCLUSION. Multiphase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images with a radiation dose reduction of 50% or greater that undergo denoising by a frequency-split multiband-filtration algorithm yield performance similar to that of routine-dose images for detection of liver metastases and vascular staging of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. The image-based denoising algorithm facilitates radiation dose reduction of multiphase examinations for both low- and high-contrast diagnostic tasks without requiring manufacturer-specific hardware or software.
Collapse
|
8
|
Vliegenthart R, Fouras A, Jacobs C, Papanikolaou N. Innovations in thoracic imaging: CT, radiomics, AI and x-ray velocimetry. Respirology 2022; 27:818-833. [PMID: 35965430 PMCID: PMC9546393 DOI: 10.1111/resp.14344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, pulmonary imaging has seen enormous progress, with the introduction, validation and implementation of new hardware and software. There is a general trend from mere visual evaluation of radiological images to quantification of abnormalities and biomarkers, and assessment of ‘non visual’ markers that contribute to establishing diagnosis or prognosis. Important catalysts to these developments in thoracic imaging include new indications (like computed tomography [CT] lung cancer screening) and the COVID‐19 pandemic. This review focuses on developments in CT, radiomics, artificial intelligence (AI) and x‐ray velocimetry for imaging of the lungs. Recent developments in CT include the potential for ultra‐low‐dose CT imaging for lung nodules, and the advent of a new generation of CT systems based on photon‐counting detector technology. Radiomics has demonstrated potential towards predictive and prognostic tasks particularly in lung cancer, previously not achievable by visual inspection by radiologists, exploiting high dimensional patterns (mostly texture related) on medical imaging data. Deep learning technology has revolutionized the field of AI and as a result, performance of AI algorithms is approaching human performance for an increasing number of specific tasks. X‐ray velocimetry integrates x‐ray (fluoroscopic) imaging with unique image processing to produce quantitative four dimensional measurement of lung tissue motion, and accurate calculations of lung ventilation. See relatedEditorial
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Data Science in Health (DASH), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Colin Jacobs
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nickolas Papanikolaou
- Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.,AI Hub, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Au C, Reeves R, Li Z, Gingold E, Halpern E, Sundaram B. Impact of multidetector computed tomography scan parameters, novel reconstruction settings, and lung nodule characteristics on nodule diameter measurements: A Phantom Study. Med Phys 2022; 49:3936-3943. [PMID: 35358333 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Novel CT reconstruction techniques strive to maintain image quality and processing efficiency. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a newer hybrid iterative reconstruction technique, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) in combination with various CT scan parameters on the semi-automated quantification using various lung nodules. METHODS A chest phantom embedded with eight spherical objects was scanned using varying CT parameters such as tube current and ASIR-V levels. We calculated absolute percentage error (APE) and mean APE (MAPE) using differences between the semi-automated measured diameters and known dimensions. Predictive variables were assessed using a multivariable general linear model. The linear regression slope coefficients (β) were reported to demonstrate effect size and directionality. RESULTS The APE of the semi-automated measured diameters was higher in ground-glass than solid nodules (β = 9.000, p<0.001). APE had an inverse relationship with nodule diameter (mm; β = -3.499, p<0.001) and tube current (mA; β = -0.006, p<0.001). MAPE did not vary based on the ASIR-V level (range: 5.7-13.1%). CONCLUSION Error is dominated by nodule characteristics with a small effect of tube current. Regardless of phantom size, nodule size accuracy is not affected by tube voltage or ASIR-V level, maintaining accuracy while maximizing radiation dose reduction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherry Au
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1620 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Russell Reeves
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| | - Zhenteng Li
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107.,The Vascular Center, St. Luke's Anderson Campus - Medical Office Building, 1700 St. Luke's Boulevard, Suite 301, Easton, PA
| | - Eric Gingold
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| | - Ethan Halpern
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| | - Baskaran Sundaram
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jungblut L, Blüthgen C, Polacin M, Messerli M, Schmidt B, Euler A, Alkadhi H, Frauenfelder T, Martini K. First Performance Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection System for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation in Dual-Source Photon-Counting Detector CT at Different Low-Dose Levels. Invest Radiol 2022; 57:108-114. [PMID: 34324462 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality (IQ) and performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system in photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for pulmonary nodule evaluation at different low-dose levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS An anthropomorphic chest-phantom containing 14 pulmonary nodules of different sizes (range, 3-12 mm) was imaged on a PCD-CT and on a conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). Scans were performed with each of the 3 vendor-specific scanning modes (QuantumPlus [Q+], Quantum [Q], and High Resolution [HR]) at decreasing matched radiation dose levels (volume computed tomography dose index ranging from 1.79 to 0.31 mGy) by adapting IQ levels from 30 to 5. Image noise was measured manually in the chest wall at 8 different locations. Subjective IQ was evaluated by 2 readers in consensus. Nodule detection and volumetry were performed using a commercially available AI-CAD system. RESULTS Subjective IQ was superior in PCD-CT compared with EID-CT (P < 0.001), and objective image noise was similar in the Q+ and Q-mode (P > 0.05) and superior in the HR-mode (PCD 55.8 ± 11.7 HU vs EID 74.8 ± 5.4 HU; P = 0.01). High resolution showed the lowest image noise values among PCD modes (P = 0.01). Overall, the AI-CAD system delivered comparable results for lung nodule detection and volumetry between PCD- and dose-matched EID-CT (P = 0.08-1.00), with a mean sensitivity of 95% for PCD-CT and of 86% for dose-matched EID-CT in the lowest evaluated dose level (IQ5). Q+ and Q-mode showed higher false-positive rates than EID-CT at lower-dose levels (IQ10 and IQ5). The HR-mode showed a sensitivity of 100% with a false-positive rate of 1 even at the lowest evaluated dose level (IQ5; CDTIvol, 0.41 mGy). CONCLUSIONS Photon-counting detector CT was superior to dose-matched EID-CT in subjective IQ while showing comparable to lower objective image noise. Fully automatized AI-aided nodule detection and volumetry are feasible in PCD-CT, but attention has to be paid to false-positive findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jungblut
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
| | | | | | - Michael Messerli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Andre Euler
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
| | - Hatem Alkadhi
- From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Karim M, Harun H, Kayun Z, Aljewaw O, Azizan S, Rafiz N, Muhammad N. Paediatric radiation dose and cancer risk associated with body effective diameter during CT thorax examination. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
12
|
Gong H, Hsieh SS, Holmes D, Cook D, Inoue A, Bartlett D, Baffour F, Takahashi H, Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG. An interactive eye-tracking system for measuring radiologists' visual fixations in volumetric CT images: Implementation and initial eye-tracking accuracy validation. Med Phys 2021; 48:6710-6723. [PMID: 34534365 PMCID: PMC8595866 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Eye-tracking approaches have been used to understand the visual search process in radiology. However, previous eye-tracking work in computer tomography (CT) has been limited largely to single cross-sectional images or video playback of the reconstructed volume, which do not accurately reflect radiologists' visual search activities and their interactivity with three-dimensional image data at a computer workstation (e.g., scroll, pan, and zoom) for visual evaluation of diagnostic imaging targets. We have developed a platform that integrates eye-tracking hardware with in-house-developed reader workstation software to allow monitoring of the visual search process and reader-image interactions in clinically relevant reader tasks. The purpose of this work is to validate the spatial accuracy of eye-tracking data using this platform for different eye-tracking data acquisition modes. METHODS An eye-tracker was integrated with a previously developed workstation designed for reader performance studies. The integrated system captured real-time eye movement and workstation events at 1000 Hz sampling frequency. The eye-tracker was operated either in head-stabilized mode or in free-movement mode. In head-stabilized mode, the reader positioned their head on a manufacturer-provided chinrest. In free-movement mode, a biofeedback tool emitted an audio cue when the head position was outside the data collection range (general biofeedback) or outside a narrower range of positions near the calibration position (strict biofeedback). Four radiologists and one resident were invited to participate in three studies to determine eye-tracking spatial accuracy under three constraint conditions: head-stabilized mode (i.e., with use of a chin rest), free movement with general biofeedback, and free movement with strict biofeedback. Study 1 evaluated the impact of head stabilization versus general or strict biofeedback using a cross-hair target prior to the integration of the eye-tracker with the image viewing workstation. In Study 2, after integration of the eye-tracker and reader workstation, readers were asked to fixate on targets that were randomly distributed within a volumetric digital phantom. In Study 3, readers used the integrated system to scroll through volumetric patient CT angiographic images while fixating on the centerline of designated blood vessels (from the left coronary artery to dorsalis pedis artery). Spatial accuracy was quantified as the offset between the center of the intended target and the detected fixation using units of image pixels and the degree of visual angle. RESULTS The three head position constraint conditions yielded comparable accuracy in the studies using digital phantoms. For Study 1 involving the digital crosshairs, the median ± the standard deviation of offset values among readers were 15.2 ± 7.0 image pixels with the chinrest, 14.2 ± 3.6 image pixels with strict biofeedback, and 19.1 ± 6.5 image pixels with general biofeedback. For Study 2 using the random dot phantom, the median ± standard deviation offset values were 16.7 ± 28.8 pixels with use of a chinrest, 16.5 ± 24.6 pixels using strict biofeedback, and 18.0 ± 22.4 pixels using general biofeedback, which translated to a visual angle of about 0.8° for all three conditions. We found no obvious association between eye-tracking accuracy and target size or view time. In Study 3 viewing patient images, use of the chinrest and strict biofeedback demonstrated comparable accuracy, while the use of general biofeedback demonstrated a slightly worse accuracy. The median ± standard deviation of offset values were 14.8 ± 11.4 pixels with use of a chinrest, 21.0 ± 16.2 pixels using strict biofeedback, and 29.7 ± 20.9 image pixels using general biofeedback. These corresponded to visual angles ranging from 0.7° to 1.3°. CONCLUSIONS An integrated eye-tracker system to assess reader eye movement and interactive viewing in relation to imaging targets demonstrated reasonable spatial accuracy for assessment of visual fixation. The head-free movement condition with audio biofeedback performed similarly to head-stabilized mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Gong
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | - Scott S. Hsieh
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | - David Holmes
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | - David Cook
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | - Akitoshi Inoue
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | | | | | - Shuai Leng
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | - Lifeng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of 0.3-mSv CT to Standard-Dose CT for Detection of Lung Nodules in Children and Young Adults With Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:1444-1451. [PMID: 34232694 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.26183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: CT is the imaging modality of choice to identify lung metastasis. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of reduced-dose CT for detection of lung nodules in children and young adults with cancer. Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients 4-21 years old with known or suspected malignancy who were undergoing clinically indicated chest CT. Study participants underwent an additional investigational reduced-dose chest CT in the same imaging encounter. Separated deidentified CT examinations were reviewed in blinded fashion by three independent radiologists. One reviewer performed a subsequent secondary review to match nodules between the standard- and reduced-dose examinations. Diagnostic performance was computed for the reduced-dose examinations, using clinical examinations as reference standard. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were calculated using Cohen's Kappa. Results: A total of 78 patients (44 male, 34 female; mean age 15.2±3.8 years) were enrolled. Mean estimated effective dose was 1.8±1.1 mSv for clinical CT and 0.3±0.1 mSv for reduced-dose CT, an 83% reduction. Forty-five (58%) patients had 162 total lung nodules (mean size 3.4±3.3 mm) detected on the clinical CT examinations. A total of 92% of nodules were visible on reduced-dose CT. Sensitivity and specificity of reduced-dose CT for nodules ranged from 63%-77% and 80%-90% respectively across the three reviewers. Intraobserver agreement between clinical and reduced-dose CT was moderate to substantial for presence of nodules (κ=0.45-0.67), and good to excellent for number of nodules (κ=0.68-0.84) and nodule size (κ=0.69-0.86). Interobserver agreement for the presence of nodules was moderate for both reduced-dose (κ=0.53) and clinical (κ=0.54) CT. A median of 1 nodule was present on clinical CT in patients with a falsely negative reduced-dose CT examination. Conclusion: Reduced-dose CT depicts greater than 90% of lung nodules in children and young adults with cancer. Reviewers identified the presence of nodules with moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Clinical Impact: CT performed at 0.3 mSv mean effective dose has acceptable diagnostic performance for lung nodule detection in children and young adults and has the potential to reduce patient dose or expand CT utilization (e.g., to replace radiography in screening or monitoring protocols).
Collapse
|
14
|
Emaminejad N, Wahi-Anwar MW, Kim GHJ, Hsu W, Brown M, McNitt-Gray M. Reproducibility of lung nodule radiomic features: Multivariable and univariable investigations that account for interactions between CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Med Phys 2021; 48:2906-2919. [PMID: 33706419 PMCID: PMC8273077 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent studies have demonstrated a lack of reproducibility of radiomic features in response to variations in CT parameters. In addition, reproducibility of radiomic features has not been well established in clinical datasets. We aimed to investigate the effects of a wide range of CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters on radiomic features in a realistic setting using clinical low dose lung cancer screening cases. We performed univariable and multivariable explorations to consider the effects of individual parameters and the simultaneous interactions between three different acquisition/reconstruction parameters of radiation dose level, reconstructed slice thickness, and kernel. METHOD A cohort of 89 lung cancer screening patients were collected that each had a solid lung nodule >4mm diameter. A computational pipeline was used to perform a simulation of dose reduction of the raw projection data, collected from patient scans. This was followed by reconstruction of raw data with weighted filter back projection (wFBP) algorithm and automatic lung nodule detection and segmentation using a computer-aided detection tool. For each patient, 36 different image datasets were created corresponding to dose levels of 100%, 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original dose level, three slice thicknesses of 0.6 mm, 1 mm, and 2 mm, as well as three reconstruction kernels of smooth, medium, and sharp. For each nodule, 226 well-known radiomic features were calculated at each image condition. The reproducibility of radiomic features was first evaluated by measuring the intercondition agreement of the feature values among the 36 image conditions. Then in a series of univariable analyses, the impact of individual CT parameters was assessed by selecting subsets of conditions with one varying and two constant CT parameters. In each subset, intraparameter agreements were assessed. Overall concordance correlation coefficient (OCCC) served as the measure of agreement. An OCCC ≥ 0.9 implied strong agreement and reproducibility of radiomic features in intercondition or intraparameter comparisons. Furthermore, the interaction of CT parameters in impacting radiomic feature values was investigated via ANOVA. RESULTS All included radiomic features lacked intercondition reproducibility (OCCC < 0.9) among all the 36 conditions. Out of 226 radiomic features analyzed, only 17 and 18 features were considered reproducible (OCCC ≥ 0.9) to dose and kernel variation, respectively, within the corresponding condition subsets. Slice thickness demonstrated the largest impact on radiomic feature values where only one to five features were reproducible at a few condition subsets. ANOVA revealed significant interactions (P < 0.05) between CT parameters affecting the variability of >50% of radiomic features. CONCLUSION We systematically explored the multidimensional space of CT parameters in affecting lung nodule radiomic features. Univariable and multivariable analyses of this study not only showed the lack of reproducibility of the majority of radiomic features but also revealed existing interactions among CT parameters, meaning that the effect of individual CT parameters on radiomic features can be conditional upon other CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters. Our findings advise on careful radiomic feature selection and attention to the inclusion criteria for CT image acquisition protocols within the datasets of radiomic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nastaran Emaminejad
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | | | - Grace Hyun J. Kim
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | - William Hsu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | - Matthew Brown
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | - Michael McNitt-Gray
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gong H, Marsh JF, Thorne J, Leng S, McCollough CH, Fletcher JG, Yu L. Deep-learning lesion and noise insertion for virtual clinical trial in Chest CT. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2021; 11595:115950S. [PMID: 35386510 PMCID: PMC8982986 DOI: 10.1117/12.2582106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Accurate and objective image quality assessment is essential for the task of radiation dose optimization in clinical CT. Standard method relies on multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) studies in which radiologists are tasked to interpret diagnostic image quality of many carefully-collected positive and negative cases. The efficiency of such MRMC studies is frequently challenged by the lengthy and expensive procedure of case collection and the establishment of clinical reference standard. To address this challenge, multiple methods of virtual clinical trial to synthesize patient cases at different conditions have been proposed. Projection-domain lesion- / noise-insertion methods require the access to patient raw data and vendor-specific proprietary tools which are frequently not accessible to most users. The conventional image-domain noise-insertion methods are often challenged by the over-simplified lesion models and CT system models which may not represent conditions in real scans. In this work, we developed deep-learning lesion and noise insertion techniques that can synthesize chest CT images at different dose levels with and without lung nodules using existing patient cases. The proposed method involved a nodule-insertion convolutional neural network (CNN) and a noise-insertion CNN. Both CNNs demonstrated comparable quality to our previously-validated projection domain lesion- / noise-insertion techniques: mean structural similarity index (SSIM) of inserted nodules 0.94 (routine dose), and mean percent noise difference ~5% (50% of routine dose). The proposed deep-learning techniques for chest CT virtual clinical trial operate directly on image domain, which is more widely applicable than projection-domain techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Gong
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901
| | | | - Jamison Thorne
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901
| | - Shuai Leng
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901
| | | | | | - Lifeng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moen TR, Chen B, Holmes DR, Duan X, Yu Z, Yu L, Leng S, Fletcher JG, McCollough CH. Low-dose CT image and projection dataset. Med Phys 2020; 48:902-911. [PMID: 33202055 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe a large, publicly available dataset comprising computed tomography (CT) projection data from patient exams, both at routine clinical doses and simulated lower doses. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS The library was developed under local ethics committee approval. Projection and image data from 299 clinically performed patient CT exams were archived for three types of clinical exams: noncontrast head CT scans acquired for acute cognitive or motor deficit, low-dose noncontrast chest scans acquired to screen high-risk patients for pulmonary nodules, and contrast-enhanced CT scans of the abdomen acquired to look for metastatic liver lesions. Scans were performed on CT systems from two different CT manufacturers using routine clinical protocols. Projection data were validated by reconstructing the data using several different reconstruction algorithms and through use of the data in the 2016 Low Dose CT Grand Challenge. Reduced dose projection data were simulated for each scan using a validated noise-insertion method. Radiologists marked location and diagnosis for detected pathologies. Reference truth was obtained from the patient medical record, either from histology or subsequent imaging. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES Projection datasets were converted into the previously developed DICOM-CT-PD format, which is an extended DICOM format created to store CT projections and acquisition geometry in a nonproprietary format. Image data are stored in the standard DICOM image format and clinical data in a spreadsheet. Materials are provided to help investigators use the DICOM-CT-PD files, including a dictionary file, data reader, and user manual. The library is publicly available from The Cancer Imaging Archive (https://doi.org/10.7937/9npb-2637). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS This CT data library will facilitate the development and validation of new CT reconstruction and/or denoising algorithms, including those associated with machine learning or artificial intelligence. The provided clinical information allows evaluation of task-based diagnostic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor R Moen
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Baiyu Chen
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David R Holmes
- Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xinhui Duan
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Zhicong Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lifeng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shuai Leng
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
White CS, Kazerooni EA. Assessing Pulmonary Nodules by Using Lower Dose at CT. Radiology 2020; 297:708-709. [PMID: 32996874 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020203501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles S White
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (C.S.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.A.K.)
| | - Ella A Kazerooni
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (C.S.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (E.A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|