Safety of Intrathecal Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents and Benefit versus Risk

An immunological puzzle: The adaptive immune system fuels Alzheimer's disease pathology

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a concerning rise in prevalence. It is projected that the number of affected individuals will reach a staggering 150 million by 2050. While recent advancements in monoclonal antibodies targeting Aβ have shown some clinical effects, there is an urgent need for improved therapies to effectively address the impeding surge of AD patients worldwide. To achieve this, a deeper understanding of the intricate mechanisms underlying the disease is crucial. In recent years, mounting evidence has underscored the vital role of the innate immune system in AD pathology. However, limited findings persist regarding the involvement of the adaptive immune system. Here, we report on the impact of the adaptive immune system on various aspects of AD by using AppNL-G-F mice crossed into a Rag2-/- background lacking mature adaptive immune cells. In addition, to simulate the continuous exposure to various challenges such as infections that is commonly observed in humans, the innate immune system was activated through the repetitive induction of peripheral inflammation. We observed a remarkably improved performance on complex cognitive tasks when a mature adaptive immune system is absent. Notably, this observation is pathologically associated with lower Aβ plaque accumulation, reduced glial activation, and better-preserved neuronal networks in the mice lacking a mature adaptive immune system. Collectively, these findings highlight the detrimental role of the adaptive immune system in AD and underscore the need for effective strategies to modulate it for therapeutic purposes.

Prospective Safety Study of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Different Doses

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In our clinical practice, we increasingly use intrathecal contrast-enhanced glymphatic MR imaging to assess CSF disturbances. However, because intrathecal MR imaging contrast agents such as gadobutrol (Gadovist; 1.0 mmol/mL) are used off-label, a thorough understanding of the safety profile is required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective safety study from August 2020 to June 2022 of intrathecal gadobutrol, including consecutive patients who received either 0.50, 0.25, or 0.10 mmol. Serious and nonserious adverse events were recorded systematically at 1-3 days, 4 weeks, and >6 months after the intrathecal administration.

RESULTS

The study included 196 patients who received intrathecal gadobutrol, including patients assessed for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH, n = 144) or patients examined for other CSF disorders (non-iNPH cohort; n = 52). The intrathecal gadobutrol doses were either 0.50 mmol (n = 56), 0.25 mmol (n = 111), or 0.10 mmol (n = 29). No serious adverse events were observed. Nonserious adverse events on days 1-3 after intrathecal gadobutrol were, to some degree, dose-dependent but mild-to-moderate, including severe headache, nausea, and/or dizziness in 6/196 (6.3%) patients, and they were more common in the non-iNPH than in the iNPH cohort. At 4 weeks, none reported severe nonserious adverse events, and 9/179 (5.0%) patients had mild-to-moderate symptoms. After >6 months, 2 patients reported mild headache.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study adds to the accumulating evidence that intrathecal gadobutrol in doses up to 0.50 is safe.

Investigation of Human Intrathecal Solute Transport Dynamics Using a Novel in vitro Cerebrospinal Fluid System Analog

BACKGROUND

Understanding the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) injection parameters is essential to improve treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders.

METHODS

An anatomically detailed in vitro model of the complete CSF system was constructed. Patient-specific cardiac- and respiratory-induced CSF oscillations were input to the model in the subarachnoid space and within the ventricles. CSF production was input at the lateral ventricles and CSF absorption at the superior sagittal sinus. A model small molecule simulated drug product containing fluorescein was imaged within the system over a period of 3-h post-lumbar ITDD injections and used to quantify the impact of (a) bolus injection volume and rate, (b) post-injection flush volume, rate, and timing, (c) injection location, and (d) type of injection device. For each experiment, neuraxial distribution of fluorescein in terms of spatial temporal concentration, area-under-the-curve (AUC), and percent of injected dose (%ID) to the brain was quantified at a time point 3-h post-injection.

RESULTS

For all experiments conducted with ITDD administration in the lumbar spine, %ID to the brain did not exceed 11.6% at a time point 3-h post-injection. Addition of a 12 mL flush slightly increased solute transport to the brain up to +3.9%ID compared to without a flush (p < 0.01). Implantation of a lumbar catheter with the tip at an equivalent location to the lumbar placed needle, but with rostral tip orientation, resulted in a small improvement of 1.5%ID to the brain (p < 0.05). An increase of bolus volume from 5 to 20 mL improved solute transport to the brain from 5.0 to 6.3%ID, but this improvement was not statistically significant. Increasing bolus injection rate from 5 to 13.3 mL/min lacked improvement of solute transport to the brain, with a value of 6.3 compared to 5.7%ID.

CONCLUSION

The in vitro modeling approach allowed precisely controlled and repeatable parametric investigation of ITDD injection protocols and devices. In combination, the results predict that parametric changes in lumbar spine ITDD-injection related parameters and devices can alter %ID to the brain and be tuned to optimize therapeutic benefit to CNS targets.