1
|
Delaloge S, Khan SA, Wesseling J, Whelan T. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: finding the balance between overtreatment and undertreatment. Lancet 2024; 403:2734-2746. [PMID: 38735296 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00425-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 15-25% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Its prognosis is excellent overall, the main risk being the occurrence of local breast events, as most cases of DCIS do not progress to invasive cancer. Systematic screening has greatly increased the incidence of this non-obligate precursor of invasion, lending urgency to the need to identify DCIS that is prone to invasive progression and distinguish it from non-invasion-prone DCIS, as the latter can be overdiagnosed and therefore overtreated. Treatment strategies, including surgery, radiotherapy, and optional endocrine therapy, decrease the risk of local events, but have no effect on survival outcomes. Active surveillance is being evaluated as a possible new option for low-risk DCIS. Considerable efforts to decipher the biology of DCIS have led to a better understanding of the factors that determine its variable natural history. Given this variability, shared decision making regarding optimal, personalised treatment strategies is the most appropriate course of action. Well designed, risk-based de-escalation studies remain a major need in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Interception Programme, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Seema Ahsan Khan
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Divisions of Molecular Pathology & Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Timothy Whelan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rizzo V, Cicciarelli F, Galati F, Moffa G, Maroncelli R, Pasculli M, Pediconi F. Could breast multiparametric MRI discriminate between pure ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma? Acta Radiol 2024; 65:565-574. [PMID: 38196268 DOI: 10.1177/02841851231225807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is often reclassified as invasive cancer in the final pathology report of the surgical specimen. It is of significant clinical relevance to acknowledge the possibility of underestimating invasive disease when utilizing preoperative biopsies for a DCIS diagnosis. In cases where such histologic upgrades occur, it is imperative to consider them in the preoperative planning process, including the potential inclusion of sentinel lymph node biopsy due to the risk of axillary lymph node metastasis. PURPOSE To assess the capability of breast multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) in differentiating between pure DCIS and microinvasive carcinoma (MIC). MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2018 and November 2022, this retrospective study enrolled patients with biopsy-proven DCIS who had undergone preoperative breast MP-MRI. We assessed various MP-MRI features, including size, morphology, margins, internal enhancement pattern, extent of disease, presence of peritumoral edema, time-intensity curve value, diffusion restriction, and ADC value. Subsequently, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association of these features with the pathological outcome. RESULTS Of 129 patients with biopsy-proven DCIS, 36 had foci of micro-infiltration on surgical specimens and eight were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The presence of micro-infiltration foci was significantly associated with several MP-MRI features, including tumor size (P <0.001), clustered ring enhancement (P <0.001), segmental distribution (P <0.001), diffusion restriction (P = 0.005), and ADC values <1.3 × 10-3 mm2/s (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION Breast MP-MRI has the potential to predict the presence of micro-infiltration foci in biopsy-proven DCIS and may serve as a valuable tool for guiding therapeutic planning.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Middle Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Aged
- Adult
- Diagnosis, Differential
- Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Breast/diagnostic imaging
- Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnostic imaging
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Aged, 80 and over
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Rizzo
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences; Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Cicciarelli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences; Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Galati
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences; Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana Moffa
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences; Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Maroncelli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences; Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcella Pasculli
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences; Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Pediconi
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences; Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buchheit JT, Schacht D, Kulkarni SA. Update on Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:292-300. [PMID: 38216382 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 18% to 25% of all diagnosed breast cancers, and is a noninvasive, nonobligate precursor lesion to invasive cancer. The diagnosis of DCIS represents a wide range of disease, including lesions with both low and high risk of progression to invasive cancer and recurrence. Over the past decade, research on the topic of DCIS has focused on the possibility of tailoring treatment for patients according to their risk for progression and recurrence, which is based on clinicopathologic, biomolecular and genetic factors. These efforts are ongoing, with recently completed and continuing clinical trials spanning the continuum of cancer care. We conducted a review to identify recent advances on the topic of diagnosis, risk stratification and management of DCIS. While novel imaging techniques have increased the rate of DCIS diagnosis, questions persist regarding the optimal management of lesions that would not be identified with conventional methods. Additionally, among trials investigating the potential for omission of surgery and use of active surveillance, 2 trials have completed accrual and 2 clinical trials are continuing to enroll patients. Identification of novel genetic patterns is expanding our potential for risk stratification and aiding our ability to de-escalate radiation and systemic therapies for DCIS. These advances provide hope for tailoring of DCIS treatment in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna T Buchheit
- Northwestern Quality Improvement, Research, & Education in Surgery (NQUIRES), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - David Schacht
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Swati A Kulkarni
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cozzi A, Di Leo G, Houssami N, Gilbert FJ, Helbich TH, Álvarez Benito M, Balleyguier C, Bazzocchi M, Bult P, Calabrese M, Camps Herrero J, Cartia F, Cassano E, Clauser P, de Lima Docema MF, Depretto C, Dominelli V, Forrai G, Girometti R, Harms SE, Hilborne S, Ienzi R, Lobbes MBI, Losio C, Mann RM, Montemezzi S, Obdeijn IM, Aksoy Ozcan U, Pediconi F, Pinker K, Preibsch H, Raya Povedano JL, Rossi Saccarelli C, Sacchetto D, Scaperrotta GP, Schlooz M, Szabó BK, Taylor DB, Ulus SÖ, Van Goethem M, Veltman J, Weigel S, Wenkel E, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Preoperative breast MRI positively impacts surgical outcomes of needle biopsy-diagnosed pure DCIS: a patient-matched analysis from the MIPA study. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3970-3980. [PMID: 37999727 PMCID: PMC11166778 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10409-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the influence of preoperative breast MRI on mastectomy and reoperation rates in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS The MIPA observational study database (7245 patients) was searched for patients aged 18-80 years with pure unilateral DCIS diagnosed at core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy (CNB/VAB) and planned for primary surgery. Patients who underwent preoperative MRI (MRI group) were matched (1:1) to those who did not receive MRI (noMRI group) according to 8 confounding covariates that drive referral to MRI (age; hormonal status; familial risk; posterior-to-nipple diameter; BI-RADS category; lesion diameter; lesion presentation; surgical planning at conventional imaging). Surgical outcomes were compared between the matched groups with nonparametric statistics after calculating odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS Of 1005 women with pure unilateral DCIS at CNB/VAB (507 MRI group, 498 noMRI group), 309 remained in each group after matching. First-line mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 20.1% (62/309 patients, OR 2.03) compared to 11.0% in the noMRI group (34/309 patients, p = 0.003). The reoperation rate was 10.0% in the MRI group (31/309, OR for reoperation 0.40) and 22.0% in the noMRI group (68/309, p < 0.001), with a 2.53 OR of avoiding reoperation in the MRI group. The overall mastectomy rate was 23.3% in the MRI group (72/309, OR 1.40) and 17.8% in the noMRI group (55/309, p = 0.111). CONCLUSIONS Compared to those going directly to surgery, patients with pure DCIS at CNB/VAB who underwent preoperative MRI had a higher OR for first-line mastectomy but a substantially lower OR for reoperation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT When confounding factors behind MRI referral are accounted for in the comparison of patients with CNB/VAB-diagnosed pure unilateral DCIS, preoperative MRI yields a reduction of reoperations that is more than twice as high as the increase in overall mastectomies. KEY POINTS • Confounding factors cause imbalance when investigating the influence of preoperative MRI on surgical outcomes of pure DCIS. • When patient matching is applied to women with pure unilateral DCIS, reoperation rates are significantly reduced in women who underwent preoperative MRI. • The reduction of reoperations brought about by preoperative MRI is more than double the increase in overall mastectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cozzi
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Di Leo
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- The Daffodil Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney (Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW), Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas H Helbich
- Division of General and Paediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Corinne Balleyguier
- Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Biomaps, UMR1281 INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Massimo Bazzocchi
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Peter Bult
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Calabrese
- Unit of Oncological and Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Julia Camps Herrero
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, Alzira, Spain
- Ribera Salud Hospitals, Valencia, Spain
| | - Francesco Cartia
- Unit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Clauser
- Division of General and Paediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Catherine Depretto
- Unit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Dominelli
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gábor Forrai
- Department of Radiology, MHEK Teaching Hospital, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Radiology, Duna Medical Center, GE-RAD Kft, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Steven E Harms
- Breast Center of Northwest Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
| | - Sarah Hilborne
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raffaele Ienzi
- Department of Radiology, Di.Bi.MED, Policlinico Universitario Paolo Giaccone Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Claudio Losio
- Department of Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefania Montemezzi
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Inge-Marie Obdeijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Umit Aksoy Ozcan
- Department of Radiology, Acıbadem Atasehir Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Federica Pediconi
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Katja Pinker
- Division of General and Paediatric Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heike Preibsch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniela Sacchetto
- Kiwifarm S.R.L., La Morra, Italy
- Disaster Medicine Service 118, ASL CN1, Levaldigi, Italy
| | | | - Margrethe Schlooz
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Botond K Szabó
- Department of Radiology, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Donna B Taylor
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Sila Ö Ulus
- Department of Radiology, Acıbadem Atasehir Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mireille Van Goethem
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Radiology, Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Veltman
- Maatschap Radiologie Oost-Nederland, Oldenzaal, The Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Weigel
- Clinic for Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Chiara Zuiani
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nguyen DL, Greenwood HI, Rahbar H, Grimm LJ. Evolving Treatment Paradigms for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Imaging Needs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2330503. [PMID: 38090808 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonobligate precursor to invasive cancer that classically presents as asymptomatic calcifications on screening mammography. The increase in DCIS diagnoses with organized screening programs has raised concerns about overdiagnosis, while a patientcentric push for more personalized care has increased awareness about DCIS overtreatment. The standard of care for most new DCIS diagnoses is surgical excision, but nonsurgical management via active monitoring is gaining attention, and multiple clinical trials are ongoing. Imaging, along with demographic and pathologic information, is a critical component of active monitoring efforts. Commonly used imaging modalities including mammography, ultrasound, and MRI, as well as newer modalities such as contrast-enhanced mammography and dedicated breast PET, can provide prognostic information to risk stratify patients for DCIS active monitoring eligibility. Furthermore, radiologists will be responsible for closely surveilling patients on active monitoring and identifying if invasive progression occurs. Active monitoring is a paradigm shift for DCIS care, but the success or failure will rely heavily on the interpretations and guidance of radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek L Nguyen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Heather I Greenwood
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lars J Grimm
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao MR, Ma WJ, Song XC, Li ZJ, Shao ZZ, Lu H, Zhao R, Guo YJ, Ye ZX, Liu PF. Feasibility analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics features for preoperative prediction of nuclear grading of ductal carcinoma in situ. Gland Surg 2023; 12:1209-1223. [PMID: 37842532 PMCID: PMC10570967 DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Background The nuclear grading of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) affects its clinical risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of predicting the nuclear grading of DCIS, by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics features. And to develop a nomogram combining radiomics features and MRI semantic features to explore the potential role of MRI radiomic features in the assessment of DCIS nuclear grading. Methods A total of 156 patients (159 lesions) with DCIS and DCIS with microinvasive (DCIS-MI) were enrolled in this retrospective study, with 112 lesions included in the training cohort and 47 lesions included in the validation cohort. Radiomics features were extracted from Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) phases 1st and 5th. After feature selection, radiomics signature was constructed and radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. Multivariate analysis was used to identify MRI semantic features that were significantly associated with DCIS nuclear grading and combined with Rad-score to construct a Nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the predictive performance of Rad-score and Nomogram, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical utility. Results In multivariate analyses of MRI semantic features, larger tumor size and heterogeneous enhancement pattern were significantly associated with high-nuclear grade DCIS (HNG DCIS). In the training cohort, Nomogram had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.879 and Rad-score had an AUC of 0.828. Similarly, in the independent validation cohort, Nomogram had an AUC value of 0.828 and Rad-score had an AUC of 0.772. In both the training and validation cohorts, Nomogram had a significantly higher AUC value than Rad-score (P<0.05). DCA confirmed that Nomogram had a higher net clinical benefit. Conclusions MRI-based radiomic features can be used as potential biomarkers for assessing nuclear grading of DCIS. The nomogram constructed by radiomic features combined with semantic features is feasible in discriminating non-HNG and HNG DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Ran Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Wen-Juan Ma
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiang-Chao Song
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhi-Jun Li
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhen-Zhen Shao
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Rui Zhao
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Yi-Jun Guo
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhao-Xiang Ye
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Pei-Fang Liu
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cozzi A, Di Leo G, Houssami N, Gilbert FJ, Helbich TH, Álvarez Benito M, Balleyguier C, Bazzocchi M, Bult P, Calabrese M, Camps Herrero J, Cartia F, Cassano E, Clauser P, de Lima Docema MF, Depretto C, Dominelli V, Forrai G, Girometti R, Harms SE, Hilborne S, Ienzi R, Lobbes MBI, Losio C, Mann RM, Montemezzi S, Obdeijn IM, Ozcan UA, Pediconi F, Pinker K, Preibsch H, Raya Povedano JL, Rossi Saccarelli C, Sacchetto D, Scaperrotta GP, Schlooz M, Szabó BK, Taylor DB, Ulus ÖS, Van Goethem M, Veltman J, Weigel S, Wenkel E, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Screening and diagnostic breast MRI: how do they impact surgical treatment? Insights from the MIPA study. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:6213-6225. [PMID: 37138190 PMCID: PMC10415233 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09600-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report mastectomy and reoperation rates in women who had breast MRI for screening (S-MRI subgroup) or diagnostic (D-MRI subgroup) purposes, using multivariable analysis for investigating the role of MRI referral/nonreferral and other covariates in driving surgical outcomes. METHODS The MIPA observational study enrolled women aged 18-80 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer destined to have surgery as the primary treatment, in 27 centres worldwide. Mastectomy and reoperation rates were compared using non-parametric tests and multivariable analysis. RESULTS A total of 5828 patients entered analysis, 2763 (47.4%) did not undergo MRI (noMRI subgroup) and 3065 underwent MRI (52.6%); of the latter, 2441/3065 (79.7%) underwent MRI with preoperative intent (P-MRI subgroup), 510/3065 (16.6%) D-MRI, and 114/3065 S-MRI (3.7%). The reoperation rate was 10.5% for S-MRI, 8.2% for D-MRI, and 8.5% for P-MRI, while it was 11.7% for noMRI (p ≤ 0.023 for comparisons with D-MRI and P-MRI). The overall mastectomy rate (first-line mastectomy plus conversions from conserving surgery to mastectomy) was 39.5% for S-MRI, 36.2% for P-MRI, 24.1% for D-MRI, and 18.0% for noMRI. At multivariable analysis, using noMRI as reference, the odds ratios for overall mastectomy were 2.4 (p < 0.001) for S-MRI, 1.0 (p = 0.957) for D-MRI, and 1.9 (p < 0.001) for P-MRI. CONCLUSIONS Patients from the D-MRI subgroup had the lowest overall mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together with P-MRI (8.5%). This analysis offers an insight into how the initial indication for MRI affects the subsequent surgical treatment of breast cancer. KEY POINTS • Of 3065 breast MRI examinations, 79.7% were performed with preoperative intent (P-MRI), 16.6% were diagnostic (D-MRI), and 3.7% were screening (S-MRI) examinations. • The D-MRI subgroup had the lowest mastectomy rate (24.1%) among MRI subgroups and the lowest reoperation rate (8.2%) together with P-MRI (8.5%). • The S-MRI subgroup had the highest mastectomy rate (39.5%) which aligns with higher-than-average risk in this subgroup, with a reoperation rate (10.5%) not significantly different to that of all other subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cozzi
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Leo
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- The Daffodil Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney (Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW), Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas H Helbich
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Corinne Balleyguier
- Department of Radiology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- BioMaps (UMR1281), INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Massimo Bazzocchi
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Peter Bult
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Calabrese
- Unit of Oncological and Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Cartia
- Unit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Clauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Catherine Depretto
- Unit of Breast Imaging, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Dominelli
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gábor Forrai
- Department of Radiology, MHEK Teaching Hospital, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Steven E Harms
- Breast Center of Northwest Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
| | - Sarah Hilborne
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raffaele Ienzi
- Department of Radiology, Di.Bi.MED, Policlinico Universitario Paolo Giaccone, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Claudio Losio
- Department of Breast Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefania Montemezzi
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Inge-Marie Obdeijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Umit A Ozcan
- Unit of Radiology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Federica Pediconi
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Katja Pinker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Structural Preclinical Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heike Preibsch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniela Sacchetto
- Kiwifarm S.r.l, La Morra, Italy
- Disaster Medicine Service 118, ASL CN1, Saluzzo, Italy
- CRIMEDIM, Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale "Amedeo Avogadro", Novara, Italy
| | | | - Margrethe Schlooz
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Botond K Szabó
- Department of Radiology, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Donna B Taylor
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Özden S Ulus
- Unit of Radiology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mireille Van Goethem
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Radiology, Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Veltman
- Maatschap Radiologie Oost-Nederland, Oldenzaal, The Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Weigel
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Reference Center for Mammography, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Chiara Zuiani
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Ospedale Universitario S. Maria della Misericordia, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yilmaz F, Hacking SM, Donegan L, Wang L, Yakirevich E, Wang Y. In Search of Calcifications : Histologic Analysis and Diagnostic Yield of Stereotactic Core Needle Breast Biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 2023:7160379. [PMID: 37167599 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) is used in the diagnostic assessment of suspicious mammographic calcifications to rule out breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). With advances in imaging technology and increased biopsy tissue volume, the detection rate of calcifications and DCIS in SCNB is unclear. METHODS This retrospective study included 916 consecutive SCNBs for calcifications performed on 893 patients in a 2-year period. RESULTS We found the cancer detection rate was 27.1% (DCIS, 23.7%; invasive, 3.4%). The detection rate for calcifications was 74.8% with the standard 3 levels. Additional leveling of calcification-negative cases further increased the detection of both calcifications (to 99.4% of cases) and DCIS (to 32.9% of cases). Lobular neoplasia (LN) was diagnosed in 41 cases. Twenty-five (61.0%) cases of LN were incidental without associated calcification. Of 32 invasive carcinomas detected on SCNB, 87.5% were T1a or less, and calcifications were associated with atypical ductal hyperplasia/DCIS or LCIS. The common benign lesions associated with calcifications were fibrocystic change (32.5%), fibroadenomatous change (30.2%), and columnar cell change and hyperplasia (8.2%). CONCLUSIONS We determined the up-to-date detection rates of calcification and DCIS in SCNB, as well as the common benign and malignant breast lesions associated with calcifications. Additional levels significantly increase the detection rate when standard levels show only stromal or scant/absent calcifications. Lobular neoplasia is often an incidental finding in SCNB for calcifications. When calcifications are present with LN, they are commonly florid, pleomorphic LCIS, or with concurrent invasive carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sean M Hacking
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Linda Donegan
- Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tabár L, Dean PB, Lee Tucker F, Yen AMF, Chang RWJ, Hsu CY, Smith RA, Duffy SW, Chen THH. Breast cancers originating from the major lactiferous ducts and the process of neoductgenesis: Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Breast, DAB. Eur J Radiol 2022; 153:110363. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
10
|
Lee SA, Lee Y, Ryu HS, Jang MJ, Moon WK, Moon HG, Lee SH. Diffusion-weighted Breast MRI in Prediction of Upstaging in Women with Biopsy-proven Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. Radiology 2022; 305:307-316. [PMID: 35787199 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.213174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Accurate preoperative prediction of upstaging in women with biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is important for surgical planning, but published models using predictive MRI features remain lacking. Purpose To develop and validate a predictive model based on preoperative breast MRI to predict upstaging in women with biopsy-proven DCIS and to select high-risk women who may benefit from sentinel lymph node biopsy at initial surgery. Materials and methods Consecutive women with biopsy-proven DCIS who underwent preoperative 3.0-T breast MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and who underwent surgery between June 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively identified (development set) from an academic medical center. The apparent diffusion coefficients of lesions from DWI, lesion size and morphologic features on DCE MRI scans, mammographic findings, age, symptoms, biopsy method, and DCIS grade at biopsy were collected. The presence of invasive cancer and axillary metastases was determined with surgical pathology. A predictive model for upstaging was developed by using multivariable logistic regression and validated in a subsequent prospective internal validation set recruited between July 2020 and April 2021. Results Fifty-seven (41%) of 140 women (mean age, 53 years ± 11 [SD]) in the development set and 43 (41%) of 105 women (mean age, 53 years ± 10) in the validation set were upstaged after surgery. The predictive model combining DWI and clinical-pathologic factors showed the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve at 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.92) in the development set and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.84) in the validation set. The predicted probability of invasive cancer showed good interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.79); the positive predictive value was 85% (28 of 33), and the negative predictive value was 92% (22 of 24). Conclusion A predictive model based on diffusion-weighted breast MRI identified women at high risk of upstaging. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Baltzer in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Ae Lee
- From the Departments of Surgery (S.A.L., H.G.M.), Radiology (Y.L., W.K.M., S.H.L.), and Pathology (H.S.R.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.)
| | - Youkyoung Lee
- From the Departments of Surgery (S.A.L., H.G.M.), Radiology (Y.L., W.K.M., S.H.L.), and Pathology (H.S.R.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.)
| | - Han Suk Ryu
- From the Departments of Surgery (S.A.L., H.G.M.), Radiology (Y.L., W.K.M., S.H.L.), and Pathology (H.S.R.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.)
| | - Myoung-Jin Jang
- From the Departments of Surgery (S.A.L., H.G.M.), Radiology (Y.L., W.K.M., S.H.L.), and Pathology (H.S.R.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.)
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- From the Departments of Surgery (S.A.L., H.G.M.), Radiology (Y.L., W.K.M., S.H.L.), and Pathology (H.S.R.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.)
| | - Hyeong-Gon Moon
- From the Departments of Surgery (S.A.L., H.G.M.), Radiology (Y.L., W.K.M., S.H.L.), and Pathology (H.S.R.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.)
| | - Su Hyun Lee
- From the Departments of Surgery (S.A.L., H.G.M.), Radiology (Y.L., W.K.M., S.H.L.), and Pathology (H.S.R.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Anderson B, Burstein HJ, Chew H, Dang C, Elias AD, Giordano SH, Goetz MP, Goldstein LJ, Hurvitz SA, Isakoff SJ, Jankowitz RC, Javid SH, Krishnamurthy J, Leitch M, Lyons J, Mortimer J, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Rosenberger LH, Rugo HS, Sitapati A, Smith KL, Smith ML, Soliman H, Stringer-Reasor EM, Telli ML, Ward JH, Wisinski KB, Young JS, Burns J, Kumar R. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:691-722. [PMID: 35714673 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 363] [Impact Index Per Article: 181.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jame Abraham
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Rebecca Aft
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Doreen Agnese
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Chau Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara H Javid
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington
| | | | | | - Janice Lyons
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John H Ward
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fazeli S, Snyder BS, Gareen IF, Lehman CD, Khan SA, Romanoff J, Gatsonis CA, Corsetti RL, Rahbar H, Spell DW, Blankstein KB, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Comstock CE, Wagner LI, Carlos RC. Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112). JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2210331. [PMID: 35536580 PMCID: PMC9092204 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.10331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Guiding treatment decisions for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) requires understanding patient preferences and the influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgeon recommendation. Objective To identify factors associated with surgery preference and surgery receipt among a prospective cohort of women with newly diagnosed DCIS. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective cohort study was conducted at 75 participating institutions, including community practices and academic centers, across the US between March 25, 2015, and April 27, 2016. Data were analyzed from August 2 to September 24, 2021. This was an ancillary study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112). Women with recently diagnosed unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision and had a diagnostic mammogram within 3 months of study registration were included. Participants who had documented surgery and completed the baseline patient-reported outcome questionnaires were included in this substudy. Exposures Women received preoperative MRI and surgeon consultation and then underwent wide local excision or mastectomy. Participants will be followed up for recurrence and overall survival for 10 years from the date of surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient-reported outcome questionnaires assessed treatment goals and concerns and surgery preference before MRI and after MRI and surgeon consultation. Results Of the 368 participants enrolled 316 (86%) were included in this substudy (median [range] age, 59.5 [34-87] years; 45 women [14%] were Black; 245 [78%] were White; and 26 [8%] were of other race). Pre-MRI, age (odds ratio [OR] per 5-year increment, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.80; P = .007) and the importance of keeping one's breast (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.72; P < .001) vs removal of the breast for peace of mind (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.76; P = .03) were associated with surgery preference for mastectomy. After MRI and surgeon consultation, MRI upstaging (48 of 316 [15%]) was associated with patient preference for mastectomy (OR, 8.09; 95% CI, 2.51-26.06; P < .001). The 2 variables with the highest ORs for initial receipt of mastectomy were MRI upstaging (OR, 12.08; 95% CI, 4.34-33.61; P < .001) and surgeon recommendation (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.99-11.83; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, change in patient preference for DCIS surgery and surgery received were responsive to MRI results and surgeon recommendation. These data highlight the importance of ensuring adequate information and ongoing communication about the clinical significance of MRI findings and the benefits and risks of available treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soudabeh Fazeli
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego
| | - Bradley S. Snyder
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Constance D. Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Seema A. Khan
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Justin Romanoff
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Constantine A. Gatsonis
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ralph L. Corsetti
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | | | - Linda K. Han
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Jennifer L. Sabol
- Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
| | - John R. Bumberry
- Department of Surgery, Mercy Hospital Springfield, Springfield, Missouri
| | - Kathy D. Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | | | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Ruth C. Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Program for Women’s Health Effectiveness Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Institute for Health Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nissan N, Bauer E, Moss Massasa EE, Sklair-Levy M. Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:71. [PMID: 35397082 PMCID: PMC8994812 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01214-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The breast experiences substantial changes in morphology and function during pregnancy and lactation which affects its imaging properties and may reduce the visibility of a concurrent pathological process. The high incidence of benign gestational-related entities may further add complexity to the clinical and radiological evaluation of the breast during the period. Consequently, pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is often a delayed diagnosis and carries a poor prognosis. This state-of-the-art pictorial review illustrates how despite currently being underutilized, technical advances and new clinical evidence support the use of unenhanced breast MRI during pregnancy and both unenhanced and dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) during lactation, to serve as effective supplementary modalities in the diagnostic work-up of PABC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noam Nissan
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel. .,Sackler Medicine School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Ethan Bauer
- Sackler Medicine School, New-York Program, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Efi Efraim Moss Massasa
- Joint Medicine School Program of Sheba Medical Center, St. George's, University of London and the University of Nicosia, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Medicine School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grimm LJ, Rahbar H, Abdelmalak M, Hall AH, Ryser MD. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review. Radiology 2021; 302:246-255. [PMID: 34931856 PMCID: PMC8805655 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonobligate precursor of invasive cancer, and its detection, diagnosis, and management are controversial. DCIS incidence grew with the expansion of screening mammography programs in the 1980s and 1990s, and DCIS is viewed as a major driver of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. For pathologists, the diagnosis and classification of DCIS is challenging due to undersampling and interobserver variability. Understanding the progression from normal breast tissue to DCIS and, ultimately, to invasive cancer is limited by a paucity of natural history data with multiple proposed evolutionary models of DCIS initiation and progression. Although radiologists are familiar with the classic presentation of DCIS as asymptomatic calcifications at mammography, the expanded pool of modalities, advanced imaging techniques, and image analytics have identified multiple potential biomarkers of histopathologic characteristics and prognosis. Finally, there is growing interest in the nonsurgical management of DCIS, including active surveillance, to reduce overtreatment and provide patients with more personalized management options. However, current biomarkers are not adept at enabling identification of occult invasive disease at biopsy or accurately predicting the risk of progression to invasive disease. Several active surveillance trials are ongoing and are expected to better identify women with low-risk DCIS who may avoid surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars J. Grimm
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Monica Abdelmalak
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Allison H. Hall
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Marc D. Ryser
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|