An Image Quality-informed Framework for CT Characterization

E., Khedr YI, Soula MA, Ali MA. Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of the Image Quality of MDCT Multiphasic Liver Scans in HCC Patients

Background: The quality of CT images obtained from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is complex, affecting diagnostic accuracy, precision, and radiation dose assessment due to increased exposure risks. Objectives: The study evaluated image quality qualitatively and quantitatively by comparing quality levels with an effective radiation dose to ensure acceptable quality accuracy. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 100 known HCC patients (Li-RADS-5) who underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) multiphasic scans for follow-up of their health condition between January and October 2023. The evaluation involved quantitative and qualitative analyses of parameters such as SD, SNR, and CNR, as well as a qualitative assessment by two radiology consultants. The outcomes were compared, and the effective dose was calculated and compared with both quantitative and qualitative assessments of image quality. Results: ROC curve analysis revealed significant differences in CT image quality, with high to moderate specificity and sensitivity across all the quantitative parameters. However, multivariate examination revealed decreasing importance levels, except for CNR (B, 0.203; p = 0.001) and SD BG (B, 0.330; p = 0.002), which increased in B. The CNR and SD BG remained independent variables for CT image quality prediction, but no statistically significant relationship was found between the effective dose and image quality, either quantitatively or qualitatively. Conclusion: This study underscores the vital role of both quantitative and qualitative assessments of CT images in evaluating their quality for patients with HCC and highlights the predictive importance of CNR, SNR, and SD. These findings emphasize the value of these devices in assessing and predicting outcomes to minimize the effective dose.

Ranking the Relative Importance of Image Quality Features in CT by Consensus Survey

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to determine consensus opinions from subspecialty radiologists and imaging physicists on the relative importance of image quality features in CT.

METHODS

A prospective survey of subspecialty radiologists and medical physicists was conducted to collect consensus opinions on the relative importance of 10 image quality features: axial sharpness, blooming, contrast, longitudinal sharpness, low-contrast axial sharpness, metal artifact, motion, noise magnitude, noise texture, and streaking. The survey was first sent to subspecialty radiologists in volunteer leadership roles in the ACR and RSNA, thereafter relying on snowball sampling. Surveyed subspecialties were abdominal, cardiac, emergency, musculoskeletal, neuroradiology, pediatric, and thoracic radiology and medical physics. Individual respondents' ratings were normalized for calculation of mean normalized ratings and priority rankings for each feature within subspecialties. Also calculated were intraclass correlation coefficients across image quality features within subspecialties and analysis of variance across subspecialties within each feature.

RESULTS

Most subspecialties had moderate to excellent intraclass agreement. For every radiology subspecialty except musculoskeletal, motion was the most important image quality feature. There was agreement across subspecialties that axial sharpness and contrast are only moderately important. There was disagreement across subspecialties on the relative importance of noise magnitude. Blooming was highly important to cardiac radiologists, and noise texture was highly important to musculoskeletal radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Image quality preferences differ based on clinical tasks and challenges in each anatomical radiology subspecialty. CT image analysis and development of quantitative measures of quality and protocol optimization-and related policy initiatives-should be specific to radiology subspecialty.

[Research Report on the Consistency of Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR)]

In 2020, recording and management of exposure doses for computed tomography (CT) became mandatory. In terms of dose management, information regarding the imaged body part is particularly important information for proper tabulation. However, the actual body part to be imaged and the body part information obtained from the device may differ. In this study, we investigated the difference between the imaged area information obtained from a CT device and the dose index when the area is divided into actual areas to be examined using a facility's unique imaging protocol. We collected 734784 radiation dose structured reports (RDSR) examined from 2014 to 2021 on CT equipment at 8 facilities and analyzed each facility's volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP). The median values were tabulated and compared. Pre- and post-classing the body part, for CTDIvol, increasing tendency was observed only in the head and abdomen. A similar trend was observed for DLP. Regarding dose management using RDSR as an information source, there were no major differences in dose information depending on the classification of the body part to be imaged. We hope that the accuracy of dose management will be improved by accurately classifying the body parts to be imaged.

Improving the Safety of Computed Tomography Through Automated Quality Measurement: A Radiologist Reader Study of Radiation Dose, Image Noise, and Image Quality

OBJECTIVES

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services funded the development of a computed tomography (CT) quality measure for use in pay-for-performance programs, which balances automated assessments of radiation dose with image quality to incentivize dose reduction without compromising the diagnostic utility of the tests. However, no existing quantitative method for assessing CT image quality has been validated against radiologists' image quality assessments on a large number of CT examinations. Thus to develop an automated measure of image quality, we tested the relationship between radiologists' subjective ratings of image quality with measurements of radiation dose and image noise.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Board-certified, posttraining, clinically active radiologists rated the image quality of 200 diagnostic CT examinations from a set of 734, representing 14 CT categories. Examinations with significant distractions, motion, or artifact were excluded. Radiologists rated diagnostic image quality as excellent, adequate, marginally acceptable, or poor; the latter 2 were considered unacceptable for rendering diagnoses. We quantified the relationship between ratings and image noise and radiation dose, by category, by analyzing the odds of an acceptable rating per standard deviation (SD) increase in noise or geometric SD (gSD) in dose.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five radiologists contributed 24,800 ratings. Most (89%) were acceptable. The odds of an examination being rated acceptable statistically significantly increased per gSD increase in dose and decreased per SD increase in noise for most categories, including routine dose head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis, which together comprise 60% of examinations performed in routine practice. For routine dose abdomen-pelvis, the most common category, each gSD increase in dose raised the odds of an acceptable rating (2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-3.24), whereas each SD increase in noise decreased the odds (0.90; 0.79-0.99). For only 2 CT categories, high-dose head and neck/cervical spine, neither dose nor noise was associated with ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation dose and image noise correlate with radiologists' image quality assessments for most CT categories, making them suitable as automated metrics in quality programs incentivizing reduction of excessive radiation doses.

Large variation in radiation dose for routine abdomen CT: reasons for excess and easy tips for reduction

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the use and impact of radiation dose reduction techniques in actual practice for routine abdomen CT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive routine abdomen CT scans in adults from a large dose registry, contributed by 95 hospitals and imaging facilities. Grouping exams into deciles by, first, patient size, and second, size-adjusted dose length product (DLP), we summarized dose and technical parameters and estimated which parameters contributed most to between-protocols dose variation. Lastly, we modeled the total population dose if all protocols with mean size-adjusted DLP above 433 or 645 mGy-cm were reduced to these thresholds.

RESULTS

A total of 748,846 CTs were performed using 1033 unique protocols. When sorted by patient size, patients with larger abdominal diameters had increased dose and effective mAs (milliampere seconds), even after adjusting for patient size. When sorted by size-adjusted dose, patients in the highest versus the lowest decile in size-adjusted DLP received 6.4 times the average dose (1680 vs 265 mGy-cm) even though diameter was no different (312 vs 309 mm). Effective mAs was 2.1-fold higher, unadjusted CTDIvol 2.9-fold, and phase 2.5-fold for patients in the highest versus lowest size-adjusted DLP decile. There was virtually no change in kV (kilovolt). Automatic exposure control was widely used to modulate mAs, whereas kV modulation was rare. Phase was the strongest driver of between-protocols variation. Broad adoption of optimized protocols could result in total population dose reductions of 18.6-40%.

CONCLUSION

There are large variations in radiation doses for routine abdomen CT unrelated to patient size. Modification of kV and single-phase scanning could result in substantial dose reduction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Radiation dose-optimization techniques for routine abdomen CT are routinely under-utilized leading to higher doses than needed. Greater modification of technical parameters and number of phases could result in substantial reduction in radiation exposure to patients.

KEY POINTS

• Based on an analysis of 748,846 routine abdomen CT scans in adults, radiation doses varied tremendously across patients of the same size and optimization techniques were routinely under-utilized. • The difference in observed dose was due to variation in technical parameters and phase count. Automatic exposure control was commonly used to modify effective mAs, whereas kV was rarely adjusted for patient size. Routine abdomen CT should be performed using a single phase, yet multi-phase was common. • kV modulation by patient size and restriction to a single phase for routine abdomen indications could result in substantial reduction in radiation doses using well-established dose optimization approaches.

Dose length product to effective dose coefficients in adults

OBJECTIVES

The most accurate method for estimating patient effective dose (a principal metric for tracking patient radiation exposure) from computed tomography (CT) requires time-intensive Monte Carlo simulation. A simpler method multiplies a scalar coefficient by the widely available scanner-reported dose length product (DLP) to estimate effective dose. We developed new adult effective dose coefficients using actual patient scans and assessed their agreement with Monte Carlo simulation.

METHODS

A multicenter sample of 216,906 adult CT scans was prospectively assembled in 2015-2020 from the University of California San Francisco International CT Dose Registry and the University of Florida library of computational phantoms. We generated effective dose coefficients for eight body regions, stratified by patient sex, diameter, and scanner manufacturer. We applied the new coefficients to DLPs to calculate effective doses and assess their correlations with Monte Carlo radiation transport-generated effective dose.

RESULTS

Effective dose coefficients varied by body region and decreased in magnitude with increasing patient diameter. Coefficients were approximately twofold higher for torso scans in smallest compared with largest diameter categories. For example, abdomen and pelvis coefficients decreased from 0.027 to 0.013 mSv/mGy-cm between the 16-20 cm and 41+ cm categories. There were modest but consistent differences by sex and manufacturer. Diameter-based coefficients used to estimate effective dose produced strong correlations with the reference standard (Pearson correlations 0.77-0.86). The reported conversion coefficients differ from previous studies, particularly in neck CT.

CONCLUSIONS

New effective dose coefficients derived from empirical clinical scans can be used to easily estimate effective dose using scanner-reported DLP.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Scalar coefficients multiplied by DLP offer a simple approximation to effective dose, a key radiation dose metric. New effective dose coefficients from this study strongly correlate with gold standard, Monte Carlo-generated effective dose, and differ somewhat from previous studies.

KEY POINTS

• Previous effective dose coefficients were derived from theoretical models rather than real patient data. • The new coefficients (from a large registry/phantom library) differ from previous studies. • The new coefficients offer reasonably reliable values for estimating effective dose.

CT acquisition parameter selection in the real world: impacts on radiation dose and variation amongst 155 institutions

OBJECTIVE

Quantify the relationship between CT acquisition parameters and radiation dose, how often parameters are adjusted in real-world practice, and their degree of contribution to real-world dose distribution. Identify discrepancies between parameters that are impactful in theory and impactful in practice.

METHODS

This study analyses 1.3 million consecutive adult routine abdomen exams performed between November 2015 and Jan 2021 included in the University of California, San Francisco International CT Dose Registry of 155 institutions. We calculated geometric standard deviation (gSD) for five parameters (kV, mAs, spiral pitch, number of phases, scan length) to assess variation in practice. A Gaussian mixed regression model was performed to predict the radiation dose-length product (DLP) using the parameters. Three conceptualizations of "impact" were computed for each parameter. To reflect the theoretical impact, we predict the increase in DLP per 10% (and 15%) increase in the parameter. To reflect the real-world practical impact, we predict the increase in DLP per gSD increase in the parameter.

RESULTS

Among studied examinations, mAs, number of phases, and scan length were frequently manipulated (gSD 1.52-1.70); kV was rarely manipulated (gSD 1.07). Theoretically, kV is the most impactful parameter (29% increase in DLP per 10% increase in kV, versus 5-9% increase for other parameters). In real-world practice, kV is less impactful; for each gSD increase in kV, the DLP increases by 20%, versus 22-69% for other parameters.

CONCLUSION

Despite the potential impact of kV on radiation dose, this parameter is rarely manipulated in common practice and this potential remains untapped.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

CT beam energy (kV) modulation has the potential to strongly reduce radiation over-dosage to the patient, theoretically more so than similar degrees of modulation in other CT acquisition parameters. Despite this, beam energy modulation rarely occurs in practice, leaving its potential untapped.

KEY POINTS

• The relationship between CT acquisition parameter selection and radiation dose roughly coincided with established theoretical understanding. • CT acquisition parameters differ from each other in frequency and magnitude of manipulation, with beam energy (kV) being rarely manipulated. • Beam energy (kV) has the potential to substantially impact radiation dose, but because it is rarely manipulated, it is the least impactful CT acquisition parameter affecting radiation dose in practice.

Dose length product to effective dose coefficients in children

BACKGROUND

The most accurate method for estimating effective dose (the most widely understood metric for tracking patient radiation exposure) from computed tomography (CT) requires time-intensive Monte Carlo simulation. A simpler method multiplies a scalar coefficient by the widely available scanner-reported dose length product (DLP) to estimate effective dose.

OBJECTIVE

Develop pediatric effective dose coefficients and assess their agreement with Monte Carlo simulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multicenter, population-based sample of 128,397 pediatric diagnostic CT scans prospectively assembled in 2015-2020 from the University of California San Francisco International CT Dose Registry and the University of Florida library of highly realistic hybrid computational phantoms. We generated effective dose coefficients for seven body regions, stratified by patient age, diameter, and scanner manufacturer. We applied the new coefficients to DLPs to calculate effective doses and assessed their correlations with Monte Carlo radiation transport-generated effective doses.

RESULTS

The reported effective dose coefficients, generally higher than previous studies, varied by body region and decreased in magnitude with increasing age. Coefficients were approximately 4 to 13-fold higher (across body regions) for patients  <1 year old compared with patients 15-21 years old. For example, head CT (54% of scans) dose coefficients decreased from 0.039 to 0.003 mSv/mGy-cm in patients  <1 year old vs. 15-21 years old. There were minimal differences by manufacturer. Using age-based conversion coefficients to estimate effective dose produced moderate to strong correlations with Monte Carlo results (Pearson correlations 0.52-0.80 across body regions).

CONCLUSIONS

New pediatric effective dose coefficients update existing literature and can be used to easily estimate effective dose using scanner-reported DLP.

Comparison of Strategies to Conserve Iodinated Intravascular Contrast Media for Computed Tomography During a Shortage

This study models the amount of contrast that could be conserved in computed tomographic examinations in the context of the current global shortage of iodinated contrast media.

Supervised Learning Models for the Preliminary Detection of COVID-19 in Patients Using Demographic and Epidemiological Parameters

The World Health Organization labelled the new COVID-19 breakout a public health crisis of worldwide concern on 30 January 2020, and it was named the new global pandemic in March 2020. It has had catastrophic consequences on the world economy and well-being of people and has put a tremendous strain on already-scarce healthcare systems globally, particularly in underdeveloped countries. Over 11 billion vaccine doses have already been administered worldwide, and the benefits of these vaccinations will take some time to appear. Today, the only practical approach to diagnosing COVID-19 is through the RT-PCR and RAT tests, which have sometimes been known to give unreliable results. Timely diagnosis and implementation of precautionary measures will likely improve the survival outcome and decrease the fatality rates. In this study, we propose an innovative way to predict COVID-19 with the help of alternative non-clinical methods such as supervised machine learning models to identify the patients at risk based on their characteristic parameters and underlying comorbidities. Medical records of patients from Mexico admitted between 23 January 2020 and 26 March 2022, were chosen for this purpose. Among several supervised machine learning approaches tested, the XGBoost model achieved the best results with an accuracy of 92%. It is an easy, non-invasive, inexpensive, instant and accurate way of forecasting those at risk of contracting the virus. However, it is pretty early to deduce that this method can be used as an alternative in the clinical diagnosis of coronavirus cases.