How We Do It: Managing the Indeterminate Renal Mass with the MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score

High-resolution and highly accelerated MRI T2 mapping as a tool to characterise renal tumour subtypes and grades

BACKGROUND

Clinical imaging tools to probe aggressiveness of renal masses are lacking, and T2-weighted imaging as an integral part of magnetic resonance imaging protocol only provides qualitative information. We developed high-resolution and accelerated T2 mapping methods based on echo merging and using k-t undersampling and reduced flip angles (TEMPURA) and tested their potential to quantify differences between renal tumour subtypes and grades.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with treatment-naïve renal tumours were imaged: seven renal oncocytomas (RO); one eosinophilic/oncocytic renal cell carcinoma; two chromophobe RCCs (chRCC); three papillary RCCs (pRCC); and twelve clear cell RCCs (ccRCC). Median, kurtosis, and skewness of T2 were quantified in tumours and in the normal-adjacent kidney cortex and were compared across renal tumour subtypes and between ccRCC grades.

RESULTS

High-resolution TEMPURA depicted the tumour structure at improved resolution compared to conventional T2-weighted imaging. The lowest median T2 values were present in pRCC (high-resolution, 51 ms; accelerated, 45 ms), which was significantly lower than RO (high-resolution; accelerated, p = 0.012) and ccRCC (high-resolution, p = 0.019; accelerated, p = 0.008). ROs showed the lowest kurtosis (high-resolution, 3.4; accelerated, 4.0), suggestive of low intratumoural heterogeneity. Lower T2 values were observed in higher compared to lower grade ccRCCs (grades 2, 3 and 4 on high-resolution, 209 ms, 151 ms, and 106 ms; on accelerated, 172 ms, 160 ms, and 102 ms, respectively), with accelerated TEMPURA showing statistical significance in comparison (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Both high-resolution and accelerated TEMPURA showed marked potential to quantify differences across renal tumour subtypes and between ccRCC grades.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03741426 . Registered on 13 November 2018.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The newly developed T2 mapping methods have improved resolution, shorter acquisition times, and promising quantifiable readouts to characterise incidental renal masses.

Diagnostic accuracy of the Clear Cell Likelihood Score and selected MRI parameters in the characterization of indeterminate renal masses - a single-institution study

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) and value of other selected magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features in the characterization of indeterminate small renal masses (SRMs).

METHODS

Fifty patients with indeterminate SRMs discovered on MRI between 2012 and 2023 were included. The ccLS for the characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) was calculated and compared to the final diagnosis (ccRCC vs. 'all other' masses).

RESULTS

The ccLS = 5 had a satisfactory accuracy of 64.0% and a very high specificity of 96.3%; however, its sensitivity of 26.1% was relatively low. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis revealed that from the selected MRI features, only T1 ratio and arterial to delayed enhancement (ADER) were good discriminators between ccRCC and other types of renal masses (area under curve, AUC = 0.707, p = 0.01; AUC = 0.673, p = 0.03; respectively). The cut-off points determined in ROC analysis using the Youden index were 0.73 (p = 0.01) for T1 ratio and 0.99 for ADER (p = 0.03). The logistic regression model demonstrated that ccLS = 5 and T1 ratio (OR = 15.5 [1.1-218.72], p = 0.04; OR = 0.002 [0.00-0.81], p = 0.04) were significant predictors of ccRCC.

CONCLUSIONS

The ccLS algorithm offers an encouraging method for the standardization of imaging protocols to aid in the diagnosis and management of SRMs in daily clinical practice by enhancing detectability of ccRCC and reducing the number of unnecessary invasive procedures for benign or indolent lesions. However, its diagnostic performance needs multi-center large cohort studies to validate it before it can be incorporated as a diagnostic algorithm and will guide future iterations of clinical guidelines. The retrospective nature of our study and small patient population confined to a single clinical center may impact the generalizability of the results; thus, future studies are required to define whether employment of the T1 ratio or ADER parameter may strengthen the diagnostic accuracy of ccRCC diagnosis.

Clear cell likelihood score may improve diagnosis and management of renal masses

The detection of solid renal masses has increased over time due to incidental findings during imaging studies conducted for unrelated medical conditions. Approximately 20% of lesions measuring less than 4 cm are benign and 80% are malignant. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most frequent among renal carcinomas, responsible for 65-80% of cases. The increased detection of renal masses facilitates early diagnosis and treatment. However, it also leads to more invasive interventions, which result in higher morbidity and costs. Currently, only histological analysis can offer an accurate diagnosis. Surgical nephron loss significantly elevates morbidity and mortality rates. Active surveillance represents a conservative management approach for patients diagnosed with a solid renal mass that is endorsed by both American Urological Association and the European Society for Medical Oncology. However, active surveillance is used in a minority of patients and varies across institutions. The lack of clinical studies using a standardized approach to incidentally detected small renal masses precludes the widespread use of active surveillance. Hence, there is an urgent need for better patient selection, distinguishing those who require surgery from those suitable for active surveillance. The clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) represents a novel MRI tool for assessing the probability of a renal mass being a ccRCC. In this study, we present a comprehensive review of renal masses and their evaluation using the ccLS to facilitate shared decision between urologists and patients.

Evaluation of a multiparametric renal CT algorithm for diagnosis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma among small (≤ 4 cm) solid renal masses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a recently proposed CT-based algorithm for diagnosis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) among small (≤ 4 cm) solid renal masses diagnosed by renal mass biopsy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 51 small renal masses in 51 patients with renal-mass CT and biopsy between 2014 and 2021. Three radiologists independently evaluated corticomedullary phase CT for the following: heterogeneity and attenuation ratio (mass:renal cortex), which were used to inform the CT score (1-5). CT score ≥ 4 was considered positive for ccRCC. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for each reader and overall using fixed effects logistic regression modelling.

RESULTS

There were 51% (26/51) ccRCC and 49% (25/51) other masses. For diagnosis of ccRCC, area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.76), 78% (68-86%), 59% (46-71%), and 67% (54-79%), respectively. CT score ≤ 2 had a negative predictive value 97% (92-99%) to exclude diagnosis of ccRCC. For diagnosis of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC), CT score ≤ 2, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were 0.89 (0.81-0.98), 81% (58-94%), 98% (93-99%), and 85% (62-97%), respectively. Pooled inter-observer agreement for CT scoring was moderate (Fleiss weighted kappa = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

The CT scoring system for prediction of ccRCC was sensitive with a high negative predictive value and moderate agreement. The CT score is highly specific for diagnosis of pRCC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The CT score algorithm may help guide renal mass biopsy decisions in clinical practice, with high sensitivity to identify clear-cell tumors for biopsy to establish diagnosis and grade and high specificity to avoid biopsy in papillary tumors.

KEY POINTS

• A CT score ≥ 4 had high sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) among solid ≤ 4-cm renal masses. • A CT score ≤ 2 was highly specific for diagnosis of papillary RCC among solid ≤ 4-cm renal masses. • Inter-observer agreement for CT score was moderate.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Clear Cell Likelihood Score Against Renal Mass Biopsy for Evaluating Small Renal Masses

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cost-effectiveness of the clear cell likelihood score compared to renal mass biopsy (RMB) alone.

METHODS

The clear cell likelihood score, a new grading system based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, has been proposed as a possible alternative to percutaneous RMB for identifying clear cell renal carcinoma in small renal masses and expediting treatment of high-risk patients. A decision analysis model was developed to compare a RMB strategy where all patients undergo biopsy and a clear cell likelihood score strategy where only patients that received an indeterminant score of 3 undergo biopsy. Effectiveness was assigned 1 for correct diagnoses and 0 for incorrect or indeterminant diagnoses. Costs were obtained from institutional fees and Medicare reimbursement rates. Probabilities were derived from literature estimates from radiologists trained in the clear cell likelihood score.

RESULTS

In the base case model, the clear cell likelihood score was both more effective (0.77 vs 0.70) and less expensive than RMB ($1629 vs $1966). Sensitivity analysis found that the nondiagnostic rate of RMB and the sensitivity of the clear cell likelihood score had the greatest impact on the model. In threshold analyses, the clear cell likelihood score was the preferred strategy when its sensitivity was greater than 62.7% and when an MRI cost less than $5332.

CONCLUSION

The clear cell likelihood score is a more cost-effective option than RMB alone for evaluating small renal masses for clear cell renal carcinoma.

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of renal biopsy cytology

BACKGROUND

The role of fine needle biopsy cytology in the workup of renal mass lesions remains controversial. With advances in imaging technology and clinical management for renal masses, a critical reevaluation of the role of renal biopsy is needed. This study was designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the performance and clinical impact of fine needle biopsy in patients with renal masses.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective study of ultrasound or computer tomography (CT)-guided fine needle biopsies of renal masses diagnosed via cytopathology was conducted. Overall diagnostic rate, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Further analysis of the impact of fine needle biopsy cytology on clinical management was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 227 cases of fine-needle aspiration and/or biopsy (FNA/B) of renal masses were identified, including 76 with subsequent nephrectomies. Complications were rare (<1%). The diagnostic rate and sensitivity of FNA/B were 83.3% and 89.5%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 98.7% at the major categorical level and 94.7% at the tumor subtype level. Subsequent clinical actions were associated with a definitive cytologic diagnosis of malignancy/neoplasia (p < .05) and were affected by tumor subtype (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that FNA/B of renal masses is a safe and reliable minimally invasive diagnostic tool with excellent accuracy in confirmation of malignancy and subclassification of tumors. Diagnoses made on FNA/B play a key role in guiding a personalized clinical treatment plan.

Update on Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis with Novel Imaging Approaches

This review highlights recent advances in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) imaging. It begins with dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), which has demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of renal masses. Several studies have suggested the potential benefits of iodine quantification, particularly for distinguishing low-attenuation, true enhancing solid masses from hyperdense cysts. By determining whether or not a renal mass is present, DECT could avoid the need for additional imaging studies, thereby reducing healthcare costs. DECT can also provide virtual unenhanced images, helping to reduce radiation exposure. The review then provides an update focusing on the advantages of multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performance in the histological subtyping of RCC and in the differentiation of benign from malignant renal masses. A proposed standardized stepwise reading of images helps to identify clear cell RCC and papillary RCC with a high accuracy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound may represent a promising diagnostic tool for the characterization of solid and cystic renal masses. Several combined pharmaceutical imaging strategies using both sestamibi and PSMA offer new opportunities in the diagnosis and staging of RCC, but their role in risk stratification needs to be evaluated. Although radiomics and tumor texture analysis are hampered by poor reproducibility and need standardization, they show promise in identifying new biomarkers for predicting tumor histology, clinical outcomes, overall survival, and the response to therapy. They have a wide range of potential applications but are still in the research phase. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown encouraging results in tumor classification, grade, and prognosis. It is expected to play an important role in assessing the treatment response and advancing personalized medicine. The review then focuses on recently updated algorithms and guidelines. The Bosniak classification version 2019 incorporates MRI, precisely defines previously vague imaging terms, and allows a greater proportion of masses to be placed in lower-risk classes. Recent studies have reported an improved specificity of the higher-risk categories and better inter-reader agreement. The clear cell likelihood score, which adds standardization to the characterization of solid renal masses on MRI, has been validated in recent studies with high interobserver agreement. Finally, the review discusses the key imaging implications of the 2017 AUA guidelines for renal masses and localized renal cancer.

Diagnostic Value of Clear Cell Likelihood Score v1.0 and v2.0 for Common Subtypes of Small Renal Masses: A Multicenter Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) is reliable for diagnosing small renal masses (SRMs). However, the diagnostic value of Clear cell likelihood score version 1.0 (ccLS v1.0) and v2.0 for common subtypes of SRMs might be a potential score extension.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of ccLS v1.0 and v2.0 for characterizing five common subtypes of SRMs.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

797 patients (563 males, 234 females; mean age, 53 ± 12 years) with 867 histologically proven renal masses.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES

3.0 and 1.5 T/T2 weighted imaging, T1 weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, a dual-echo chemical shift (in- and opposed-phase) T1 weighted imaging, multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.

ASSESSMENT

Six abdominal radiologists were trained in the ccLS algorithm and independently scored each SRM using ccLS v1.0 and v2.0, respectively. All SRMs had definite pathological results. The pooled area under curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ccLS v1.0 and v2.0 for characterizing common subtypes of SRMs. The average κ values were calculated to evaluate the interobserver agreement of the two scoring versions.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Random-effects logistic regression; Receiver operating characteristic analysis; DeLong test; Weighted Kappa test; Z test. The statistical significance level was P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The pooled AUCs of clear cell likelihood score version 2.0 (ccLS v2.0) were statistically superior to those of ccLS v1.0 for diagnosing clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (0.907 vs. 0.851), papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) (0.926 vs. 0.888), renal oncocytoma (RO) (0.745 vs. 0.679), and angiomyolipoma without visible fat (AMLwvf) (0.826 vs. 0.766). Interobserver agreement for SRMs between ccLS v1.0 and v2.0 is comparable and was not statistically significant (P = 0.993).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of ccLS v2.0 surpasses that of ccLS v1.0 for characterizing ccRCC, pRCC, RO, and AMLwvf. Especially, the standardized algorithm has optimal performance for ccRCC and pRCC. ccLS has potential as a supportive clinical tool.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

Deep Learning Assessment of Small Renal Masses at Contrast-enhanced Multiphase CT

Background Accurate characterization of suspicious small renal masses is crucial for optimized management. Deep learning (DL) algorithms may assist with this effort. Purpose To develop and validate a DL algorithm for identifying benign small renal masses at contrast-enhanced multiphase CT. Materials and Methods Surgically resected renal masses measuring 3 cm or less in diameter at contrast-enhanced CT were included. The DL algorithm was developed by using retrospective data from one hospital between 2009 and 2021, with patients randomly allocated in a training and internal test set ratio of 8:2. Between 2013 and 2021, external testing was performed on data from five independent hospitals. A prospective test set was obtained between 2021 and 2022 from one hospital. Algorithm performance was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared with the results of seven clinicians using the DeLong test. Results A total of 1703 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 12 [SD]; 619 female) with a single renal mass per patient were evaluated. The retrospective data set included 1063 lesions (874 in training set, 189 internal test set); the multicenter external test set included 537 lesions (12.3%, 66 benign) with 89 subcentimeter (≤1 cm) lesions (16.6%); and the prospective test set included 103 lesions (13.6%, 14 benign) with 20 (19.4%) subcentimeter lesions. The DL algorithm performance was comparable with that of urological radiologists: for the external test set, AUC was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.85) versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.88) (P = .61); for the prospective test set, AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.93) versus 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) (P = .70). For subcentimeter lesions in the external test set, the algorithm and urological radiologists had similar AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.83) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.92) (P = .78), respectively. Conclusion The multiphase CT-based DL algorithm showed comparable performance with that of radiologists for identifying benign small renal masses, including lesions of 1 cm or less. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

Characterization of Demographical Histologic Diversity in Small Renal Masses With the Clear Cell Likelihood Score

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a diagnostic model to estimate the distribution of small renal mass (SRM; ≤4 cm) histologic subtypes for patients with different demographic backgrounds and clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) designations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A bi-institution retrospective cohort study was conducted where 347 patients (366 SRMs) underwent magnetic resonance imaging and received a ccLS before pathologic confirmation between June 2016 and November 2021. Age, sex, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, body mass index (BMI), and the ccLS were tabulated. The socioeconomic status for each patient was determined using the Area Deprivation Index associated with their residential address. The magnetic resonance imaging-derived ccLS assists in the characterization of SRMs by providing a likelihood of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Pathological subtypes were grouped into four categories (ccRCC, papillary renal cell carcinoma, other renal cell carcinomas, or benign). Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate probabilities of the pathological subtypes across different patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Race and ethnicity, BMI, and ccLS were significant predictors of histology (all P < 0.001). Obese (BMI, ≥30 kg/m 2 ) Hispanic patients with ccLS of ≥4 had the highest estimated rate of ccRCC (97.1%), and normal-weight (BMI, <25 kg/m 2 ) non-Hispanic Black patients with ccLS ≤2 had the lowest (0.2%). The highest estimated rates of papillary renal cell carcinoma were found in overweight (BMI, 25-30 kg/m 2 ) non-Hispanic Black patients with ccLS ≤2 (92.3%), and the lowest, in obese Hispanic patients with ccLS ≥4 (<0.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient race, ethnicity, BMI, and ccLS offer synergistic information to estimate the probabilities of SRM histologic subtypes.

Applicability of Bosniak 2019 for renal mass classification on portal venous phase at the era of spectral CT imaging using rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the applicability of Bosniak 2019 criteria on a monophasic portal venous phase using rapid kilovoltage-switching DECT (rsDECT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-seven renal masses assessed on rsDECT were included, classified according to Bosniak 2019 classification using MRI as the reference standard. Using the portal venous phase, virtual monochromatic images at 40, 50, and 77 keV; virtual unenhanced (VUE) images; and iodine map images were reconstructed. Changes in attenuation values between VUE and 40 keV, 50 keV, and 77 keV measurements were computed and respectively defined as ∆HU40keV, ∆HU50keV, and ∆HU77keV. The values of ∆HU40keV, ∆HU50keV, and ∆HU77keV thresholds providing the optimal diagnostic performance for the detection of internal enhancement were determined using Youden index.

RESULTS

Population study included 25 solid renal masses (25/127, 20%) and 102 cystic renal masses (102/127, 80%). To differentiate solid to cystic masses, the specificity of the predefined 20 HU threshold reached 88% (95%CI: 82, 93) using ∆HU77keV and 21% (95%CI: 15, 28) using ∆HU40keV. The estimated optimal threshold of attenuation change was 19 HU on ∆HU77keV, 69 HU on ∆HU50eV, and 111 HU on ∆HU40eV. The rsDECT classification was highly similar to that of MRI for solid renal masses (23/25, 92%) and for Bosniak 1 masses (62/66, 94%). However, 2 hyperattenuating Bosniak 2 renal masses (2/26, 8%) were classified as solid renal masses on rsDECT.

CONCLUSION

DECT is a promising tool for Bosniak classification particularly to differentiate solid from Bosniak I-II cyst. However, known enhancement thresholds must be adapted especially to the energy level of virtual monochromatic reconstructions.

CLINICAL STATEMENT

DECT is a promising tool for Bosniak classification; however, known enhancement thresholds must be adapted according to the types of reconstructions used and especially to the energy level of virtual monochromatic reconstructions.

KEY POINTS

• To differentiate solid to cystic renal masses, predefined 20 HU threshold had a poor specificity using 40 keV virtual monochromatic images. • Most of Bosniak 1 masses according to MRI were also classified as Bosniak 1 on rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT). • Bosniak 2 hyperattenuating renal cysts mimicked solid lesion on rsDECT.

Differentiation between renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma using clear cell likelihood score

PURPOSE

Clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) may be a reliable diagnostic method for distinguishing renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). In this study, we aim to explore the value of ccLS in differentiating EAML from ccRCC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis in which 27 EAML patients and 60 ccRCC patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at our institution. Two radiologists trained in the ccLS algorithm scored independently and the consistency of their interpretation was evaluated. The difference of the ccLS score was compared between EAML and ccRCC in the whole study cohort and two subgroups [small renal masses (SRM; ≤ 4 cm) and large renal masses (LRM; > 4 cm)].

RESULTS

In total, 87 patients (59 men, 28 women; mean age, 55±11 years) with 90 renal masses (EAML: ccRCC = 1: 2) were identified. The interobserver agreement of two radiologists for the ccLS system to differentiate EAML from ccRCC was good (k = 0.71). The ccLS score in the EAML group and the ccRCC group ranged from 1 to 5 (73.3% in scores 1-2) and 2 to 5 (76.7% in scores 4-5), respectively, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). With the threshold value of 2, ccLS can distinguish EAML from ccRCC with the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.8%, 95.0%, 73.3%, 87.7%, and 88.0%, respectively. The AUC (area under the curve) was 0.913. And the distribution of the ccLS score between the two diseases was not affected by tumor size (P = 0.780).

CONCLUSION

The ccLS can distinguish EAML from ccRCC with high accuracy and efficiency.

Association of sex-specific abdominal adipose tissue with WHO/ISUP grade in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To explore the association between computed tomography (CT)-measured sex-specific abdominal adipose tissue and the pathological grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 560 patients (394 males and 166 females) with pathologically proven ccRCC (467 low- and 93 high-grade). Abdominal CT images were used to assess the adipose tissue in the subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular regions. Subcutaneous fat index (SFI), visceral fat index (VFI), intermuscular fat index (IFI), total fat index (TFI), and relative visceral adipose tissue (rVAT) were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed according to sex to identify the associations between fat-related parameters and pathological grade.

RESULTS

IFI was significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC patients than in low-grade patients for both men and women. For male patients with high-grade tumors, the SFI, VFI, TFI, and rVAT were significantly lower, but not for female patients. In both univariate and multivariate studies, the IFI continued to be a reliable and independent predictor of high-grade ccRCC, regardless of sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermuscular fat index proved to be a valuable biomarker for the pathological grade of ccRCC and could be used as a reliable independent predictor of high-grade ccRCC for both males and females.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Sex-specific fat adipose tissue can be used as a new biomarker to provide a new dimension for renal tumor-related research and may provide new perspectives for personalized tumor management decision-making approaches.

KEY POINTS

• There are sex differences in distribution of subcutaneous fat and visceral fat. • The SFI, VFI, TFI, and rVAT were significantly lower in high-grade ccRCC male patients, but not for female patients. • Intermuscular fat index can be used as a reliable independent predictor of high-grade ccRCC for both males and females.

Utility of multiparametric renal CT for differentiation of low-grade from high-grade cT1a clear cell renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine if CT can differentiate low-grade from high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in cT1a solid ccRCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated 78 < 4 cm solid (>25% enhancing) ccRCC in 78 patients with renal CT within 12 months of surgery between January 2016 and December 2019. Two radiologists (R1/R2), blinded to pathology, independently recorded mass:size, calcification, attenuation and heterogeneity (5-point Likert scale) and recorded a 5-point ccRCC CT Score. Multivariate logistic regression (LR) was performed.

RESULTS

There were 64.1% (50/78) low-grade (5/50 Grade 1 and 45/50 Grade 2) and 35.9% (28/78) high-grade (27/28 Grade 3 and 1/28 Grade 4) tumors.Unenhanced CT attenuation was higher (35.9±10.3 R1 and 34.9±10.7 R2 high-grade vs 29.7±10.2 R1 and 29.5±9.8 R2 low-grade, p=0.01-0.02), absolute corticomedullary phase attenuation ratio (CMphase-ratio; 0.67±0.16 R1 and 0.66±0.16 R2 vs 0.93±0.83 R1 and 0.80±0.33 R2, p=0.04-0.05) and 3-tiered stratification of CMphase-ratio (p=0.02) lower in high-grade tumors.A two-variable LR-model including unenhanced CT attenuation and CM.phase-ratio achieved area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of: 73% (95% confidence intervals 59-86%) and 72% (59-84%) for R1 and R2.ccRCC CT score differed by ccRCC grade (p<0.01 R1, R2) with high-grade tumors occurring most commonly in moderately enhancing ccRCC score 4 (46.4% [13/28] R1 and 54% [15/28]).

CONCLUSION

Among cT1a ccRCC, high-grade tumors have higher unenhanced CT attenuation and are less avidly enhancing.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

High-grade ccRCC have higher attenuation (possibly due to less microscopic fat) and lower corticomedullary phase enhancement compared to low-grade tumors. This may result in categorization of high-grade tumors in lower ccRCC diagnostic algorithm categories.

CT-derived textural analysis parameters discriminate high-attenuation renal cysts from solid renal neoplasms

AIM

To assess the utility of textural features on computed tomography (CT) to differentiate high-attenuation cysts from solid renal neoplasms among indeterminate renal lesions detected incidentally on CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included if they had an indeterminate renal lesion on CT that was subsequently characterised on ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Up to three lesions per patient were included if they had a size ≥10 mm and density of 20-70 HU on unenhanced CT or any single phase of contrast-enhanced CT. Cases were categorised as benign or most likely benign cysts (Bosniak II and IIF) versus indeterminate (Bosniak III), mixed solid and cystic (Bosniak IV), or solid renal lesions. A random forest model was generated using 95 textural parameters and four clinical parameters for each lesion.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-four patients were included who had a total of 278 lesions. Of these, 193 (69%) were benign or most likely benign cysts and 85 (31%) were indeterminate, mixed cystic and solid, or solid renal lesions. The random forest model had an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 0.78), with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.2% and 38.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A multivariate model including textural and clinical parameters had moderate overall performance for discriminating benign or likely benign cysts from indeterminate, mixed solid and cystic, or solid renal lesions. This study serves as a proof of concept and may reduce the need for further follow-up by characterising a significant portion of indeterminate lesions on CT as benign.

Peripheral nodular enhancement in adrenal and renal hematomas: A report of 3 cases

There are a wide range of benign and malignant pathologies that the radiologist may encounter in the adrenal glands and kidneys, often incidentally when imaging is performed for other indications. Many imaging modalities including CT, MR, and US are often used in an attempt to characterize these lesions. A definitive radiological diagnosis, however, is not always possible. This is at times due to atypical presentations of typical lesions which may be mistaken for more aggressive or concerning pathologic conditions. Adrenal lesions that do not demonstrate characteristic benign imaging features might require surgical excision. Similarly, cystic renal lesions that demonstrate nodular enhancement are concerning for Bosniak IV lesions and require surgical management. We report 3 cases in 3 different patients of incidentally discovered hematomas with peripheral enhancement, 2 involving the adrenal gland and 1 involving the kidney. All 3 of these histologically proven hematomas demonstrated similar radiological manifestations of peripheral nodular progressive enhancement, mimicking neoplastic conditions, and necessitating surgical removal.

Insights into Renal Cell Carcinoma with Novel Imaging Approaches

This article presents a comprehensive overview of new imaging approaches and techniques for improving the assessment of renal masses and renal cell carcinoma. The Bosniak classification, version 2019, as well as the clear cell likelihood score, version 2.0, will be discussed as new imaging algorithms using established techniques. Additionally, newer modalities, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dual energy computed tomography, and molecular imaging, will be discussed in conjunction with emerging radiomics and artificial intelligence techniques. Current diagnostic algorithms combined with newer approaches may be an effective way to overcome existing limitations in renal mass and RCC characterization.

Renal Mass Imaging with MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score: A User's Guide

Small solid renal masses (SRMs) are frequently detected at imaging. Nearly 20% are benign, making careful evaluation with MRI an important consideration before deciding on management. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal cell carcinoma subtype with potentially aggressive behavior. Thus, confident identification of ccRCC imaging features is a critical task for the radiologist. Imaging features distinguishing ccRCC from other benign and malignant renal masses are based on major features (T2 signal intensity, corticomedullary phase enhancement, and the presence of microscopic fat) and ancillary features (segmental enhancement inversion, arterial-to-delayed enhancement ratio, and diffusion restriction). The clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) system was recently devised to provide a standardized framework for categorizing SRMs, offering a Likert score of the likelihood of ccRCC ranging from 1 (very unlikely) to 5 (very likely). Alternative diagnoses based on imaging appearance are also suggested by the algorithm. Furthermore, the ccLS system aims to stratify which patients may or may not benefit from biopsy. The authors use case examples to guide the reader through the evaluation of major and ancillary MRI features of the ccLS algorithm for assigning a likelihood score to an SRM. The authors also discuss patient selection, imaging parameters, pitfalls, and areas for future development. The goal is for radiologists to be better equipped to guide management and improve shared decision making between the patient and treating physician. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Pedrosa in this issue.

Using the "2 standard deviations" rule with Dixon MRI to differentiate renal cell carcinoma types

BACKGROUND

Clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are distinguishable based on microscopic fat, detectable by chemical shift MRI. However, these assessments are often subjective. Conversely, Dixon MRIs and the "2 standard deviations" rule (2SDR) are quantitative methods that may decrease diagnostic subjectivity. Therefore, this study assessed the value of the 2SDR for detecting microscopic fat and thus differentiating clear cell and non-clear cell RCC using Dixon MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with RCC who underwent preoperative Dixon MRI. The patients were grouped based on tumor type: clear cell RCC and non-clear cell RCC. The 2SDR value was calculated based on in-phase and opposed-phase images and then compared between the two groups. 2SDR values >0 indicated clear cell RCCs, whereas values <0 indicated non-clear cell RCC.

RESULTS

We included 151 patients; 114 patients had clear cell RCC, of which 106 had a 2SDR value >0. Furthermore, 37 patients had non-clear cell RCC, of which 3 had a 2SDR value >0. The 2SDR value was significantly higher in the clear cell RCC group than in the non-clear cell RCC group (p = 0.000). Overall, 93.0% (106/114) and 8.1% (3/37) of patients with clear cell and non-clear cell RCC, respectively, had microscopic fat. The evaluation indices for this 2SDR method were: accuracy: 92.72%, sensitivity: 92.98%, specificity: 91.89%, positive predictive value: 97.25%, and negative predictive value: 80.95%.

CONCLUSIONS

2SDR values calculated from Dixon magnetic resonance images can differentiate clear cell from non-clear cell RCCs by detecting microscopic fat.

PRECIS

The "2 standard deviations" rule value calculated from Dixon MR images differentiates clear cell from non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma with high efficiency by detecting microscopic fat.

Radiologist's Disease: Imaging for Renal Cancer

There is a clear benefit of imaging-based differentiation of small indeterminate masses to its subtypes of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), chromophobe RCC, papillary RCC, fat poor angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma because it helps determine the next step options for the patients. The work thus far in radiology has explored different parameters in computed tomography, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound with the discovery of many reliable imaging features that suggest certain tissue subtypes. Likert score-based risk stratification systems can help determine management, and new techniques such as perfusion, radiogenomics, single-photon emission tomography, and artificial intelligence can add to the imaging-based evaluation of indeterminate renal masses.

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Solid Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Biparametric (bp)-MRI and multiparametric (mp)-MRI may improve the diagnostic accuracy of renal mass histology.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the available evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of bp-MRI and mp-MRI for solid renal masses in differentiating malignant from benign, aggressive from indolent, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other histology.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review.

POPULATION

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to January 11, 2022 were searched.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5 or 3 Tesla.

ASSESSMENT

Eligible studies evaluated the accuracy of MRI (with at least two sequences: T2, T1, dynamic contrast and diffusion-weighted imaging) for diagnosis of solid renal masses in adult patients, using histology as reference standard. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed using QUADAS-2.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Meta-analysis using a bivariate logitnormal random effects model.

RESULTS

We included 10 studies (1239 masses from approximately 1200 patients). The risk of bias was high in three studies, unclear in five studies and low in two studies. The diagnostic accuracy of malignant (vs. benign) masses was assessed in five studies (64% [179/281] malignant). The summary estimate of sensitivity was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77%-99%), and specificity was 63% (95% CI: 46%-77%). No study assessed aggressive (vs. indolent) masses. The diagnostic accuracy of ccRCC (vs. other subtypes) was evaluated in six studies (47% [455/971] ccRCC): the summary estimate of sensitivity was 85% (95% CI: 77%-90%) and specificity was 77% (95% CI: 73%-81%).

DATA CONCLUSION

Our study reveals deficits in the available evidence on MRI for diagnosis of renal mass histology. The number of studies was limited, at unclear/high risk of bias, with heterogeneous definitions of solid masses, imaging techniques, diagnostic criteria, and outcome measures.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Performance of clear cell likelihood scores in characterizing solid renal masses at multiparametric MRI: an external validation study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver agreement of ccLS in diagnosing clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study evaluated consecutive patients with solid renal masses who underwent mpMRI followed by percutaneous biopsy and/or surgical excision between January 2010 and December 2020. Predominantly (> 75%) cystic masses, masses with macroscopic fat and infiltrative masses were excluded. Two abdominal radiologists independently scored each renal mass according to the proposed ccLS algorithm. The diagnostic performance of ccLS categories for ccRCC was calculated using logistic regression modeling. Diagnostic accuracy for predicting ccRCC was calculated using 2 × 2 contingency tables. Interobserver agreement for ccLS was evaluated with Cohen's k statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 12 [SD], 50 men) with 81 renal masses were evaluated. The mean size was 36 mm ± 28 (range 10-160). Of the renal masses included, 44% (36/81) were ccRCC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95). Using ccLS ≥ 4 to diagnose ccRCC, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 93% (95% CI 79, 99), 63% (95% CI 48, 77), and 67% (95% CI 58, 75), respectively. The negative predictive value of ccLS ≤ 2 was 93% (95% CI 64, 99). The proportion of ccRCC by ccLS category 1 to 5 were 10%, 0%, 10%, 57%, and 84%, respectively. Interobserver agreement was moderate (k = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

In this study, clear cell likelihood score had moderate interobserver agreement and resulted in 96% negative predictive value in excluding ccRCC.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Virtual Biopsy of Common Solid Renal Masses-A Pictorial Review

ABSTRACT

The expanded application of radiologic imaging resulted in an increased incidence of renal masses in the recent decade. Clinically, it is difficult to determine the malignant potential of the renal masses, thus resulting in complex management. Image-guided biopsies are the ongoing standard of care to identify molecular variance but are limited by tumor accessibility and heterogeneity. With the evolving importance of individualized cancer therapies, radiomics has displayed promising results in the identification of tumoral mutation status on routine imaging. This article discusses how magnetic resonance imaging features can guide a radiologist toward identifying renal mass characteristics.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Renal Tumors

Renal cell carcinomas accounts for 2% of all the cancers globally. Most of the renal tumors are detected incidentally. Ultrasound remains the main screening modality to evaluate the renal masses. A multi -phase contrast enhanced computer tomography is must for characterizing the renal lesions. Imaging plays an important role in staging, treatment planning and follow up of renal cancers. In this review , we discuss the imaging guidelines for the management of renal tumors.

Diagnostic Performance and Interreader Agreement of the MRI Clear Cell Likelihood Score for Characterization of cT1a and cT1b Solid Renal Masses: An External Validation Study

BACKGROUND. The clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) has been proposed for the noninvasive differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other renal neoplasms on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), though further external validation remains needed. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of the ccLS version 2.0 (v2.0) for characterizing solid renal masses as ccRCC. METHODS. This retrospective study included 102 patients (67 men, 35 women; mean age, 56.9 ± 12.8 [SD] years) who underwent mpMRI between January 2013 and February 2018, showing a total of 108 (≥ 25% enhancing tissue) solid renal masses measuring 7 cm or smaller (83 cT1a [≤ 4 cm] and 25 cT1b [> 4 cm and ≤ 7 cm]), all with a histologic diagnosis. Three abdominal radiologists independently reviewed the MRI examinations using ccLS v2.0. Median reader sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were computed for predicting ccRCC by ccLS of 4 or greater, and individual reader AUCs were derived. The percentage of masses that were ccRCC was calculated, stratified by ccLS. Interobserver agreement was assessed by the Fleiss kappa statistic. RESULTS. The sample included 45 ccRCCs (34 cT1a, 11 cT1b), 30 papillary renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 13 chromophobe RCCs, 14 oncocytomas, and six fat-poor angiomyolipomas. Median reader sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting ccRCC by ccLS of 4 or greater were 85%, 82%, and 83% among cT1a masses and 82%, 100%, and 92% among cT1b masses. The three readers' AUCs for predicting ccRCC by ccLS for cT1a masses were 0.90, 0.84, and 0.89 and for cT1b masses were 0.99, 0.97, and 0.92. Across readers, the percentage of masses that were ccRCC among cT1a masses was 0%, 0%, 20%, 68%, and 93% for ccLS of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively; among cT1b masses, the percentage of masses that were ccRCC was 0%, 0%, 32%, 90%, and 100% for ccLS of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Interobserver agreement among cT1a and cT1b masses for ccLS of 4 or greater was 0.82 and 0.83 and for ccLS of 1-5 overall was 0.65 and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSION. This study provides external validation of the ccLS, finding overall high measures of diagnostic performance and interreader agreement. CLINICAL IMPACT. The ccLS provides a standardized approach to the noninvasive diagnosis of ccRCC by MRI.

Development of a Multiparametric Renal CT Algorithm for Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Among Small (≤ 4 cm) Solid Renal Masses

BACKGROUND. The MRI clear cell likelihood score predicts the likelihood that a renal mass is clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). A CT-based algorithm has not yet been established. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to develop and evaluate a CT-based algorithm for diagnosing ccRCC among small (≤ 4 cm) solid renal masses. METHODS. This retrospective study included 148 patients (73 men, 75 women; mean age, 58 ± 12 [SD] years) with 148 small (≤ 4 cm) solid (> 25% enhancing tissue) renal masses that underwent renal mass CT (unenhanced, corticomedullary, and nephrographic phases) before resection between January 2016 and December 2019. Two radiologists independently evaluated CT examinations and recorded calcification, mass attenuation in all phases, mass-to-cortex corticomedullary attenuation ratio, and heterogeneity score (score on a 5-point Likert scale, assessed in corticomedullary phase). Features associated with ccRCC were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis and then used to create a five-tiered CT score for diagnosing ccRCC. RESULTS. The masses comprised 53% (78/148) ccRCC and 47% (70/148) other histologic diagnoses. The mass-to-cortex corticomedullary attenuation ratio was higher for ccRCC than for other diagnoses (reader 1: 0.84 ± 0.68 vs 0.68 ± 0.65, p = .02; reader 2: 0.75 ± 0.29 vs 0.59 ± 0.25, p = .02). The heterogeneity score was higher for ccRCC than other diagnoses (reader 1: 4.0 ± 1.1 vs 1.5 ± 1.6, p < .001; reader 2: 4.4 ± 0.9 vs 3.3 ± 1.5, p < .001). Other features showed no difference. A five-tiered diagnostic algorithm including the mass-to-cortex corticomedullary attenuation ratio and heterogeneity score had interobserver agreement of 0.71 (weighted κ) and achieved an AUC for diagnosing ccRCC of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.82) for reader 1 and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.82) for reader 2. A CT score of 4 or greater achieved sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of 71% (95% CI, 59-80%), 79% (95% CI, 67-87%), and 79% (95% CI, 67-87%) for reader 1 and 42% (95% CI, 31-54%), 81% (95% CI, 70-90%), and 72% (95% CI, 56-84%) for reader 2. A CT score of 2 or less had NPV of 85% (95% CI, 69-95%) for reader 1 and 88% (95% CI, 69-97%) for reader 2. CONCLUSION. A five-tiered renal CT algorithm, including the mass-to-cortex corticomedullary attenuation ratio and heterogeneity score, had substantial interobserver agreement, moderate AUC and PPV, and high NPV for diagnosing ccRCC. CLINICAL IMPACT. The CT algorithm, if validated, may represent a useful clinical tool for diagnosing ccRCC.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of multiparametric MRI clear cell likelihood scores for classification of small renal masses

Purpose

To systematically assess the multiparametric MRI clear cell likelihood score (ccLS) algorithm for the classification of small renal masses (SRM).

Methods

We conducted an electronic literature search on Web of Science, MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar to identify relevant articles from 2017 up to June 30, 2022. We included studies reporting the diagnostic performance of the ccLS for characterization of solid SRM. The bivariate model and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model were used to pool sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The quality evaluation was performed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Results

A total of 6 studies with 825 renal masses (785 patients) were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for cT1a renal masses were 0.80 (95% CI 0.75–0.85) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.65–0.81) at the threshold of ccLS ≥4, the pooled LR+, LR−, and DOR were 3.04 (95% CI 2.34-3.95), 0.27 (95% CI 0.22–0.33), and 11.4 (95% CI 8.2-15.9), respectively. The area under the HSROC curve was 0.84 (95% CI 0.81–0.87). For all cT1 renal masses, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 (95% CI 0.74–0.85) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.67–0.83).

Conclusions

The ccLS had moderate to high accuracy for identifying ccRCC from other RCC subtypes and with a moderate inter-reader agreement. However, its diagnostic performance remain needs multi-center, large cohort studies to validate in the future.

Acquired cystic disease subtype renal cell carcinoma (ACD-RCC): prevalence and imaging features at a single institution

PURPOSE

Acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) is commonly seen in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and patients with ACKD have an increased risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Acquired cystic disease-associated RCC (ACD-RCC) was incorporated into the 2016 World Health Organization Classification. This study aims to describe the imaging features of ACD-RCC, which are not well reported previously.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with ACKD who underwent total nephrectomy for concern of a renal mass between 2016 and 2021 yielded 122 nephrectomies in 107 patients. Pathology reports were searched for type and subtype of mass. In ACD-RCC subtypes, imaging studies were evaluated for modality and contrast enhancement (CE). Imaging findings assessed included cystic/solid nature, unenhanced CT (NECT) attenuation, enhancement characteristics [non-enhancing (< 10 HU difference), equivocal (10-20 HU), enhancing (> 20 HU)], subjective MRI enhancement, T1 and T2 signal intensity, restricted diffusion, ultrasound (US) echogenicity, and subjective CEUS enhancement.

RESULTS

148 masses were identified, 122 (82%) of which were malignant and 26 (18%) benign. The three most common tumors were clear cell RCC (n = 47), papillary RCC (n = 35), and ACD-RCC (n = 21). Of the 21 cases of ACD-RCC, 16 had preoperative imaging: CT (15: 6 NECT only, 2 CECT only, 7 combined NECT and CECT), MRI (4), CEUS (5). Ten of these tumors were solid/mostly solid and 6 mixed cystic/solid. On NECT, the average attenuation was 35 HU (range 13-52). Of those with multiphasic CTs, 1 was non-enhancing, 3 were equivocal, and 3 enhanced. All 3 masses imaged with CE-MRI showed enhancement. All 4 tumors evaluated by MRI demonstrated T2 hypointensity and restricted diffusion. All five masses enhanced on CEUS.

CONCLUSION

ACD-RCC subtype was the third most common renal neoplasm in ACKD patients. Our findings found that no single imaging feature is pathognomonic for ACD-RCC. However, ACD-RCCs are typically solid masses with most demonstrating equivocal or mild enhancement on CT. T2 hypointensity and restricted diffusion were the most common MRI features.

Novel Imaging Methods for Renal Mass Characterization: A Collaborative Review

CONTEXT

The incidental detection of localized renal masses has been rising steadily, but a significant proportion of these tumors are benign or indolent and, in most cases, do not require treatment. At the present time, a majority of patients with an incidentally detected renal tumor undergo treatment for the presumption of cancer, leading to a significant number of unnecessary surgical interventions that can result in complications including loss of renal function. Thus, there exists a clinical need for improved tools to aid in the pretreatment characterization of renal tumors to inform patient management.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence on noninvasive, imaging-based tools for solid renal mass characterization.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The MEDLINE database was systematically searched for relevant studies on novel imaging techniques and interpretative tools for the characterization of solid renal masses, published in the past 10 yr.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Over the past decade, several novel imaging tools have offered promise for the improved characterization of indeterminate renal masses. Technologies of particular note include multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney, molecular imaging with targeted radiopharmaceutical agents, and use of radiomics as well as artificial intelligence to enhance the interpretation of imaging studies. Among these, 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT) for the identification of benign renal oncocytomas and hybrid oncocytic chromophobe tumors, and positron emission tomography/CT imaging with radiolabeled girentuximab for the identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, are likely to be closest to implementation in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of novel imaging tools stand poised to aid in the noninvasive characterization of indeterminate renal masses. In the future, these tools may aid in patient management by providing a comprehensive virtual biopsy, complete with information on tumor histology, underlying molecular abnormalities, and ultimately disease prognosis.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Not all renal tumors require treatment, as a significant proportion are either benign or have limited metastatic potential. Several innovative imaging tools have shown promise for their ability to improve the characterization of renal tumors and provide guidance in terms of patient management.