Allergic-like Hypersensitivity Reactions to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: An 8-year Cohort Study of 154 539 Patients

Clinical Safety of Gadobutrol: Review of Over 25 Years of Use Exceeding 100 Million Administrations

BACKGROUND

The macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent gadobutrol was introduced to the market in February 1998. Over the last 25 years, gadobutrol has been administered more than 100 million times worldwide providing a wealth of data related to safety.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a thorough review and status update on gadobutrol's safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Safety data from the clinical phase II-IV program and postmarketing surveillance were descriptively analyzed from February 1998 until December 31, 2022. Literature on special at-risk populations and specific safety aspects was critically summarized.

RESULTS

Forty-five clinical phase II-IV studies recruited 7856 patients receiving gadobutrol. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3.4% and serious AEs in <0.1% of patients. Nausea (0.7%) and dysgeusia (0.4%) were the most reported AEs. All other drug-related AEs occurred ≤0.3%. After more than 100 million gadobutrol administrations, overall adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from postmarketing surveillance (including clinical trials) were rare with an overall reporting rate of 0.0356%, hypersensitivity reactions (0.0147%), nausea (0.0032%), vomiting (0.0025%), and dyspnea (0.0010%). All other ADRs were <0.001%. No trend for higher rates of AEs was found in patients with reduced renal or liver function. Seven clinical studies reported safety findings in 7292 children ≤18 years, thereof 112 newborns/toddlers younger than 2 years. Overall, 61 ADRs (0.84%) were reported, including 3 serious ones. Adverse events in patients ≥65 years of age ("elderly") were significantly less frequent than in younger patients. A total of 4 reports diagnostic of or consistent with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis have been received. No causal relationship has been established between clinical signs and symptoms and the presence of small amounts of gadolinium in the body in patients with normal renal function after use of gadobutrol.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 100 million administrations worldwide have shown gadobutrol's well-established benefit-risk profile in any approved indication and populations.

Differences in hypersensitivity reactions and gadolinium deposition disease/symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents: new insights based on global databases VigiBase, FAERS, and IQVIA-MIDAS

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) can occur unexpectedly and be life-threatening when gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are used. Gadolinium deposition disease (GDD) and symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure (SAGE) have been controversial for a long time. However, similar studies are currently incomplete or outdated. Therefore, comparing the safety of different GBCAs in terms of HSRs and GDD/SAGE using the latest post-marketing safety data should yield further insights into safely using GBCAs.

METHODS

The safety differences between all GBCAs to GDD and the spectrum of GBCA-related HSRs were all compared and analyzed by using the World Health Organization database VigiBase and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database in this study. A further analysis of SAGE was also conducted using FAERS data. The lower limit of the reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% confidence interval was used for signal detection. Moreover, the frequency of HSRs was calculated by dividing the number of reports in VigiBase by the total sales volume (measured in millions) from 2008 to 2022 in the IQVIA Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System. All adverse events were standardized using the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 26.0.

RESULTS

This study shows that all GBCAs have the potential to induce HSRs, with nonionic linear GBCAs exhibiting a comparatively lower signal. According to standardized MedDRA query stratification analysis, gadobutrol had a greater ROR025 for angioedema. The ROR025 of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoteridol is larger for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock conditions. Regarding severe cutaneous adverse reactions, only gadoversetamide and gadodiamide showed signals in FAERS and VigiBase. There were also differences in the frequency of HSRs between regions. Regarding GDD, gadoterate meglumine, and gadoteridol had a lower ROR025. An analysis of the 29 preferred terms linked to SAGE indicated that special consideration should be given to the risk of skin induration associated with gadoversetamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoteridol. Additionally, gadodiamide and gadoteridol pose a greater risk of skin tightness compared to other GBCAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk differences among GBCAs using data from several sources were compared in this study. However, as a hypothesis-generating method, a clear causal relationship would require further research and validation.

How I do it: Sternocleidomastoid sparing approach for the right vertebral artery to common carotid artery transposition

BACKGROUND

Direct surgery is an important option to treat vertebral artery (VA) stenosis.

METHOD

A patient with symptomatic stenosis at the origin of the right VA underwent transposition of the right VA to the common carotid artery (CCA). Using the sternocleidomastoid sparing approach, the VA was anastomosed to the posterior wall of the CCA by twisting the CCA to expose its posterior wall to face the operative field.

CONCLUSION

This approach, consisting of securing the proximal VA and then following it to its distal end, not only preserves the sternocleidomastoid muscle but also protects the sympathetic chains and thoracic duct.

Safety of Gadoxetate Disodium for Hepatobiliary MRI in Children and Adolescents

Background Despite a proven role in the characterization of liver lesions, use of the gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadoxetate disodium at MRI is limited in children due to a lack of comparative safety data. Purpose To evaluate the safety of the GBCA gadoxetate disodium (a linear ionic hepatobiliary contrast agent [HBA]) in children and adolescents, compared with extracellular contrast agents (ECA). Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger who underwent HBA-enhanced MRI at one of three tertiary hospitals from January 2010 to December 2022. The incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events was compared between MRI examinations with a HBA and those with ECA. Severity was categorized according to American College of Radiology guidelines (mild, moderate, or severe). (a) Propensity score matching using multivariable logistic regression models and (b) inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis based on nine covariates (age, sex, asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria or atopy, food allergy, drug allergy, premedication, and history of GBCA-associated adverse events) were used for confounder adjustment. Results A total of 1629 MRI examinations (ECA, n = 1256; HBA, n = 373) in 1079 patients were included (mean age, 8.6 years ± 6.5; 566 girls). The per-examination incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events showed no evidence of a difference, with rates of 0.9% (11 of 1256 examinations) for ECA and 1.3% (five of 373 examinations) for HBA (odds ratio [OR], 1.55 [95% CI: 0.54, 4.46]; P = .42). Acute adverse events were all mild with ECA, whereas with HBA, they were mild for four patients and moderate for one patient. There was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of acute adverse events, even in propensity score matching (OR, 1.33 [95% CI: 0.30, 5.96]; P = .71) and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (OR, 0.84 [95% CI: 0.25, 2.86]; P = .78). Conclusion Gadoxetate disodium showed no difference in acute adverse events compared with ECA in children and adolescents, with further large-scale pediatric studies required to confirm its safety. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Otero in this issue.

Relationship Between Patient-Friendly Audiovisual Systems and MRI Contrast Agent to Adverse Reactions

BACKGROUND

Patient-friendly audiovisual (AV) systems in head MRI examinations can potentially reduce patient anxiety and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) adverse reactions to gadolinium.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a patient-friendly AV system reduces the rate of adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Four thousand eight hundred thirty-two outpatients (2462 female) attending for clinical CE-MRI studies. (Gadoteridol: 1971, Meglumine gadoterate: 2733, Gadobutrol: 128.) FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Routine CE-MRI of head and neck using a 1.5 T or 3 T scanner with or without a patient-friendly AV system.

ASSESSMENT

One thousand one hundred fifty-nine patients were scanned on MRI machines equipped with patient-friendly AV systems (AV group) and 3673 on MRI machines without AV systems (control group). Adverse reaction rate and symptoms were reviewed by referring to the system database and electronic medical records and compared between the two groups. Adverse reactions were defined as physiological reactions, such as vomiting and allergic-like reactions, such as urticaria, occurring within 1 hour of contrast injection. We compare patient backgrounds, adverse reaction rate, adverse reactions symptoms and the severity between the two groups.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Adverse reaction rate with and without a patient-friendly AV system were compared using Fisher's exact test. The relationship between patient-friendly AV systems and the occurrence of adverse reactions was evaluated with logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 4832 patients enrolled, 65 (1.35%) experienced adverse reactions. The most common adverse reactions in both groups were urticaria and pruritus. Adverse reaction rate was significantly lower in the AV group than in the control group (0.7% vs. 1.6%). No significant difference was observed in the severity (P = 1.000) of adverse reactions and symptoms (allergic-like reaction: P = 0.08, physiologic reaction: P = 1.000) between the two groups.

DATA CONCLUSION

The patient-friendly AV system significantly reduce adverse reaction occurrence to gadolinium-based contrast agents.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

A retrospective study on adverse events of intravenous administration of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in abdominal and superficial applications in 83,778 patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the rate of adverse events (AEs) caused by intravenous administration of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in abdominal and superficial applications retrospectively and to explore practical measures for prevention and treatment of them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study enrolled 83,778 contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations using sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles intravenously performed during 11 years. Age, gender, and target organs of all CEUS patients were recorded. For cases of AEs, their medical history and laboratory results were also collected. The process of AEs was assessed and categorized. Besides, the management of AEs were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty patients had sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles-related AEs. The AE rate was 0.024%. No significant difference was observed between patients with AEs and the whole group for age and sex distribution. All AEs happened in liver examinations. Among them, 7 (35%) were mild, 8 (40%) were moderate, and 5 (25%) were severe. They were categorized into 15 allergic-like reactions and 5 physiologic reactions. The manifestations of mild and moderate AEs mainly include urticaria, chills, and mild hypoxia, which could be eased by simple management. Severe cases had anaphylactic shock, generalized convulsions, and diffuse erythema with hypotension respectively. They need close monitoring and oxygen inhalation with anti-shock and anti-anaphylactic treatment. Most cases started within 30 min and recovered within 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in abdominal and superficial applications was safe with rare AEs. AEs were more likely to happen in abdominal applications than superficial ones. A well-designed emergency plan should be available for clinical use of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles to reduce AEs and to deal with AEs properly.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Intravenous administration of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in abdominal and superficial applications reported few AEs and could be considered safe but severe AEs are life-threatening. We analyzed the influence factors of AEs and propose some methods for prevention and treatment of them, which can further improve the safety of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

• The AE rate of sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles in abdominal and superficial applications was 0.024%. • Patients were more likely to have AEs in abdominal applications than superficial ones. • Severe AEs are life-threatening and need prompt identification and treatment. • We summarized some detailed suggestions for clinical prevention and treatment of AEs.

Gender Differences in Pharmacokinetics: A Perspective on Contrast Agents

Gender is an important risk factor for adverse drug reactions. Women report significantly more adverse drug reactions than men. There is a growing consensus that gender differences in drug PK is a main contributor to higher drug toxicity in women. These differences stem from physiological differences (body composition, plasma protein concentrations, and liver and kidney function), drug interactions, and comorbidities. Contrast agents are widely used to enhance diagnostic performance in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Despite their broad use, these contrast agents can lead to important adverse reactions including hypersensitivity reactions, nephropathy, and hyperthyroidism. Importantly, female gender is one of the main risk factors for contrast agent toxicity. As these adverse reactions may be related to gender differences in PK, this perspective aims to describe distribution and elimination pathways of commonly used contrast agents and to critically discuss gender differences in these processes.

Where does the gadolinium go? A review into the excretion and retention of intravenous gadolinium

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are commonly used in medical imaging. Most intravenously (IV) administered gadolinium is excreted via the kidneys, and pathological retention in renal failure leading to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is well described. More recently, retention of gadolinium in the body in the absence of renal disease has been identified, with unknown clinical consequences. Many patients are aware of this, either through the media or via comprehensive consent documentation. Some internet sites, without hard evidence, have suggested a constellation of possible symptoms associated with GBCA retention. Recent experience with patients ascribing symptoms to a contrast-enhanced MRI examination prompted this review of the fate of injected GBCA after MRI study, and of information available to patients online regarding gadolinium retention.

Safety considerations related to intravenous contrast agents in pediatric imaging

Intravenous contrast media are used in MRI, CT and US studies for anatomical evaluation and lesion characterization. Safety is always of paramount importance when administering any contrast media to children, and it is important for radiologists and ordering providers to be knowledgeable of the safety profiles and potential adverse events that can occur. This manuscript reviews the frequency and types of adverse events associated with intravenous contrast agents reported in the pediatric literature. Overall, intravenous contrast agents are very safe to use in children. However, familiarity with how to treat and prevent these uncommon events is crucial in preventing poor outcomes. In addition, an understanding of gadolinium deposition in tissues can help facilitate conversations with concerned physicians and parents. This review provides a concise yet comprehensive reference for radiologists and ordering providers on intravenous contrast safety considerations in the pediatric patient.

Diagnosis and Prevention of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) have become one of the major causes of drug hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) related to increasing numbers of ICM-based radiological imaging procedures. Strategies for diagnosing and preventing ICM-induced HSRs have not been uniformly standardized yet. However, advances have been made based on the results of recent research. A previous history of hypersensitivity to ICM is the most significant risk factor for developing HSR by ICM. Avoidance of culprit agents and premedication is the main strategy to prevent recurrences of HSRs in high-risk patients. In addition, we strongly recommend identifying sensitized ICM using skin tests to determine immunoglobulin E-mediated or delayed-type allergy and to guide the choice of an alternative contrast agent. ICM provocation test procedures have been established and are helpful in selected cases. In this paper, we review how to evaluate patients who have experienced immediate or delayed HSRs caused by ICM to minimize the risk of recurrence and discuss unmet needs that require further research.