1
|
Giganti F, Cole AP, Fennessy FM, Clinton T, Moreira PLDF, Bernardes MC, Westin CF, Krishnaswamy D, Fedorov A, Wollin DA, Langbein B, Frego N, Labban M, Badaoui JS, Chang SL, Briggs LG, Tokuda J, Ambrosi A, Kirkham A, Emberton M, Kasivisvanathan V, Moore CM, Allen C, Tempany CM. Promoting the use of the PI-QUAL score for prostate MRI quality: results from the ESOR Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis teaching fellowship. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:461-471. [PMID: 35771247 PMCID: PMC9244244 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08947-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score is a new metric to evaluate the diagnostic quality of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate. This study assesses the impact of an intervention, namely a prostate MRI quality training lecture, on the participant's ability to apply PI-QUAL. METHODS Sixteen participants (radiologists, urologists, physicists, and computer scientists) of varying experience in reviewing diagnostic prostate MRI all assessed the image quality of ten examinations from different vendors and machines. Then, they attended a dedicated lecture followed by a hands-on workshop on MRI quality assessment using the PI-QUAL score. Five scans assessed by the participants were evaluated in the workshop using the PI-QUAL score for teaching purposes. After the course, the same participants evaluated the image quality of a new set of ten scans applying the PI-QUAL score. Results were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The reference standard was the PI-QUAL score assessed by one of the developers of PI-QUAL. RESULTS There was a significant improvement in average area under the curve for the evaluation of image quality from baseline (0.59 [95 % confidence intervals: 0.50-0.66]) to post-teaching (0.96 [0.92-0.98]), an improvement of 0.37 [0.21-0.41] (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A teaching course (dedicated lecture + hands-on workshop) on PI-QUAL significantly improved the application of this scoring system to assess the quality of prostate MRI examinations. KEY POINTS • A significant improvement in the application of PI-QUAL for the assessment of prostate MR image quality was observed after an educational intervention. • Appropriate training on image quality can be delivered to those involved in the acquisition and interpretation of prostate MRI. • Further investigation will be needed to understand the impact on improving the acquisition of high-quality diagnostic prostate MR examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giganti
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St., W1W 7TS, London, UK.
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fiona M Fennessy
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy Clinton
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mariana Costa Bernardes
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carl-Fredrik Westin
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deepa Krishnaswamy
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andriy Fedorov
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Wollin
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bjoern Langbein
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicola Frego
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joy S Badaoui
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Logan G Briggs
- Division of Urological Surgery, Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Junichi Tokuda
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St., W1W 7TS, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St., W1W 7TS, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd Floor, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley St., W1W 7TS, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare M Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barrett T, de Rooij M, Giganti F, Allen C, Barentsz JO, Padhani AR. Quality checkpoints in the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:9-22. [PMID: 36168056 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00648-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI of the prostate is now recommended as the initial diagnostic test for men presenting with suspected prostate cancer, with a negative MRI enabling safe avoidance of biopsy and a positive result enabling MRI-directed sampling of lesions. The diagnostic pathway consists of several steps, from initial patient presentation and preparation to performing and interpreting MRI, communicating the imaging findings, outlining the prostate and intra-prostatic target lesions, performing the biopsy and assessing the cores. Each component of this pathway requires experienced clinicians, optimized equipment, good inter-disciplinary communication between specialists, and standardized workflows in order to achieve the expected outcomes. Assessment of quality and mitigation measures are essential for the success of the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Quality assurance processes including Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System, template biopsy, and pathology guidelines help to minimize variation and ensure optimization of the diagnostic pathway. Quality control systems including the Prostate Imaging Quality scoring system, patient-level outcomes (such as Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System MRI score assignment and cancer detection rates), multidisciplinary meeting review and audits might also be used to provide consistency of outcomes and ensure that all the benefits of the MRI-directed pathway are achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Maarten de Rooij
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jelle O Barentsz
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|