Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis

[Relationship between Radiation Quality and Image Quality in Digital Chest Radiography: Validation Study Using Human Soft Tissue-equivalent Phantom]

PURPOSE

To evaluate image quality for chest radiography at different radiation qualities, using phantoms with scatter fractions similar to those of lungs.

METHODS

Two base phantoms with 10 and 4 cm thicknesses, respectively, made of a soft tissue-equivalent material, were used to mimic the X-ray attenuation of the human lung. Two plates with soft tissue- and bone-equivalent materials, respectively, were placed on the base phantom as contrast objects. The image data were obtained with the same entrance surface dose in each radiation quality. Six radiation qualities generated using 120 and 90 kV, and additional copper filters with thicknesses 0, 0.1, and 0.2 mm were selected. The signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SdNR) and a contrast ratio of the soft tissue to the bone were measured for the six radiation qualities.

RESULTS

The thicker the additional filter, the better the SdNR at both tube voltages. The SdNR values were not significantly different between 120 and 90 kV for the same filter thickness. The contrast ratio was higher at 120 than at 90 kV by approximately 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the advantage of the contrast ratio and the highest SdNR, the radiation quality with 120 kV and 0.2-mm copper filtration was the best. It was indicated that the conventional tube voltage of 120 kV remains to be better than the lower tube voltage of 90 kV.

Optimisation of radiographic acquisition parameters for direct digital radiography: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this systematic review was to uncover and synthesise all available literature regarding appropriate acquisition parameters for direct digital radiography. It sought to either confirm current practices as optimal, or to uncover practices that may produce more optimised results.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of published and unpublished literature was undertaken to find studies that evaluated how adjustment of different acquisition parameters affected subjective image quality and patient radiation dose. Eight hundred and fifty-eight studies were retrieved for title and abstract screening. Eighty-nine studies were retrieved for full-text screening, and 23 were included for review and methodological quality screening.

RESULTS

Narrative synthesis of the 23 included studies revealed limited evidence to guide any potential change or acceptance of currently accepted best practice. Meta-analysis was unable to be performed for any of the included studies due to high levels of methodological heterogeneity. A key finding of this review was that the goals of optimisation research varied greatly across the included studies.

CONCLUSION

Significant methodological heterogeneity in the included studies limited the number of clinically relevant findings that would give evidence to an acceptance of, or suggest changes to, currently accepted best practice. Improving consistency in approach across future works of technique optimisation will ensure future systematic reviews will be able to provide strong evidence and meta-analysis will be able to be performed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review highlights that in the literature, studies of optimisation of radiographic acquisition parameters have varying goals. This methodological heterogeneity limits the applicability of systematic reviews and precludes the use of meta-analysis. The authors recommend that a framework for optimisation research be produced as a priority to help improve homogeneity in future research.

Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the relationship between entrance surface dose (ESD) and physical image quality of original and bone-suppressed chest radiographs acquired using high and low tube voltages.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic chest phantom and a 12-mm diameter spherical simulated nodule with a CT value of approximately + 100 HU were used. The lung field in the chest radiograph was divided into seven areas, and the nodule was set in a total of 66 positions. A total of 264 chest radiographs were acquired using four ESD conditions: approximately 0.3 mGy at 140 and 70 kVp and approximately 0.2 and 0.1 mGy at 70 kVp. The radiographs were processed to produce bone-suppressed images. Differences in contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values of the nodule between each condition and between the original and bone-suppressed images were analyzed by a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

In the areas not overlapping with the ribs, both contrast and CNR values were significantly increased with the bone-suppression technique (p < 0.01). In the bone-suppressed images, these values of the three conditions at 70 kVp were equal to or significantly higher than those of the condition at 140 kVp. There was no apparent decrease in these values between the ESD of approximately 0.3 and 0.1 mGy at 70 kVp.

CONCLUSION

By using the shortest exposure time and the lowest tube voltage possible not to increase in blurring artifact and image noise, it is possible to improve the image quality of bone-suppressed images and reduce the patient dose.

KEY POINTS

• The effectiveness of bone-suppression techniques differs in areas of lung field. • Image quality of bone-suppressed chest radiographs is improved by lower tube voltage. • Applying lower tube voltage to bone-suppressed chest radiographs leads to dose reduction.

Low-dose CT screening using hybrid iterative reconstruction: confidence ratings of diagnoses of simulated lesions other than lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the confidence ratings of diagnoses of simulated lesions other than lung cancer on low-dose screening CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

METHODS

Simulated lesions (emphysema, mediastinal masses and interstitial pneumonia) in a chest phantom were scanned by a 320-row area detector CT. The scans were performed by 64-row and 160-row helical scans at various dose levels and were reconstructed by filtered back projection (FBP) and IR. Emphysema, honeycombing and reticular opacity were visually scored on a four-point scale by six thoracic radiologists. The ground-glass opacity as a percentage of total lung volume (%GGO), CT value and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of mediastinal masses were calculated. These scores and values were compared between FBP and IR. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used (p < 0.05). Interobserver agreements were evaluated by κ statistics.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in visual assessment. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect. CT values were almost equivalent between FBP and IR, whereas CNR with IR was significantly higher than that with FBP. %GGO significantly increased at low-dose levels with FBP; however, IR suppressed the elevation.

CONCLUSION

The confidence ratings of diagnoses of simulated lesions other than lung cancer on low-dose CT screening were not degraded with hybrid IR compared with FBP.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Hybrid IR did not degrade the confidence ratings of diagnoses on visual assessment and differential diagnoses based on CT value of mediastinal masses, and it showed the advantage of higher GGO conspicuity at low-dose level. Radiologists can analyse images of hybrid IR alone on low-dose CT screening for lung cancer.

Detectability of simulated interstitial pneumonia on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography

OBJECTIVE

To compare the detectability of simulated interstitial pneumonia on chest radiographs between an irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector (ISS-FPD) and computed radiography (CR).

METHODS

Simulated interstitial pneumonia findings (ground-glass opacity, reticular opacity and honeycomb lung) were superimposed on an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Chest radiographs were acquired under three exposure levels (4.0, 3.2 and 2.0 mAs) with an ISS-FPD and with CR. 5 thoracic radiologists evaluated 72 images for the presence or absence of a lesion over each of 6 areas. A total of 1296 observations were analysed in a receiver-operating characteristic analysis. A jackknife method was used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The areas under the curves (AUCs) for the detection of simulated honeycomb lung obtained with the ISS-FPD were significantly larger than those obtained with CR at all exposure conditions. For the detection of simulated ground-glass opacity and reticular opacity, there were no significant differences between the two systems. In addition, the AUCs for the detectability of simulated honeycomb lung obtained with the ISS-FPD at all exposure levels were significantly larger than those obtained with CR at 4 mAs.

CONCLUSION

The ISS-FPD was superior to CR for the detection of simulated honeycomb lung. Provided that the chosen model is representative of interstitial pneumonia, the use of an ISS-FPD might reduce a patient's exposure dose during the detection of interstitial pneumonia.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The ISS-FPD has shown its advantage compared with CR in the detection of honeycombing, one sign of interstitial pneumonia.

Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose

Although the transition from conventional screen-film imaging to digital image acquisition has been almost completed during the last couple of years, examination parameters, such as tube voltage, tube current, and filtration have been adopted from screen-film technology without further adjustments. Digital systems, however, are characterised by their flexibility: the acquisition dose can be reduced at the expense of image quality and vice versa. The imaging parameters must be optimised according to the best performance of a particular system. The traditional means of dose containment, such as positioning and collimation, are as valid for digital techniques as they were for conventional techniques. Digital techniques increasingly offer options for dose reduction. At the same time, there is a risk of substantially increasing the patient dose, possibly unawares, due to the lack of visual control. Therefore, implementation of dose indicators and dose monitoring is mandatory for digital radiography. The use of image quality classes according to the dose requirements of given clinical indications are a further step toward modern radiation protection.

Dose and perceived image quality in chest radiography

Chest radiography is the most commonly performed diagnostic X-ray examination. The radiation dose to the patient for this examination is relatively low but because of its frequent use, the contribution to the collective dose is considerable. Consequently, optimization of dose and image quality offers a challenging area of research. In this article studies on dose reduction, different detector technologies, optimization of image acquisition and new technical developments in image acquisition and post processing will be reviewed. Studies indicate that dose reduction in PA chest images to at least 50% of commonly applied dose levels does not affect diagnosis in the lung fields; however, dose reduction in the mediastinum, upper abdomen and retrocardiac areas appears to directly deteriorate diagnosis. In addition to patient dose, also the design of the various digital detectors seems to have an effect on image quality. With respect to image acquisition, studies showed that using a lower tube voltage improves visibility of anatomical structures and lesions in digital chest radiographs but also increases the disturbing appearance of ribs. New techniques that are currently being evaluated are dual energy, tomosynthesis, temporal subtraction and rib suppression. These technologies may improve diagnostic chest X-ray further. They may for example reduce the negative influence of over projection of ribs, referred to as anatomic noise. In chest X-ray this type of noise may be the dominating factor in the detection of nodules. In conclusion, optimization and new developments will enlarge the value of chest X-ray as a mainstay in the diagnosis of chest diseases.

Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality

The introduction of digital radiography not only has revolutionized communication between radiologists and clinicians, but also has improved image quality and allowed for further reduction of patient exposure. However, digital radiography also poses risks, such as unnoticed increases in patient dose and suboptimum image processing that may lead to suppression of diagnostic information. Advanced processing techniques, such as temporal subtraction, dual-energy subtraction and computer-aided detection (CAD) will play an increasing role in the future and are all targeted to decrease the influence of distracting anatomic background structures and to ease the detection of focal and subtle lesions. This review summarizes the most recent technical developments with regard to new detector techniques, options for dose reduction and optimized image processing. It explains the meaning of the exposure indicator or the dose reference level as tools for the radiologist to control the dose. It also provides an overview over the multitude of studies conducted in recent years to evaluate the options of these new developments to realize the principle of ALARA. The focus of the review is hereby on adult applications, the relationship between dose and image quality and the differences between the various detector systems.

Information loss in visual assessments of medical images

We applied information theory to quantify information losses in assessing contrast-detail (C-D) analysis. Images of a C-D phantom were acquired with a flat panel detector (FPD) and a computed radiography (CR) by changing surface entrance doses. Six phantom radiographs (FPD: five images; CR: one image) were prepared for visual evaluations. Thirteen radiographers and two radiologists participated in the observation test. Detectability was defined as the shortest length of the cylinders of which border the observers could recognize from the background, and was recorded using row number. Information content was defined as the entropy summation operatorp(i)log(1/p(i)) with detection probabilities p(i), which were calculated from distribution of detection rate of the ith column. Information loss, in unit of bits, was calculated as the difference between information obtained and information content when all the columns were detected. The information losses decreased with the increase in cylinder diameters and with the increase in surface entrance dose. Because the information loss varies depending on distribution of detection rate, this method of using the information theory was expected to be more sensitive in evaluating the C-D image quality than using the averaged values of detectability.

Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography

PURPOSE

To determine to what extent dose reduction results in decreased detection of simulated nodules on patient digital posteroanterior (PA) chest radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Raw data from 20 clinical digital PA chest images that were reported as having normal findings and that were obtained with a slot-scan charge-coupled device system were used. For research protocol that concerns data with patient identities concealed, institutional review board approval is not required. One hundred twenty nodules varying in size and signal intensity were digitally simulated and added to the chest images. Hard copies were printed to represent a 100% dose and, by adding noise, to represent simulated patient doses of 50%, 25%, and 12%. Four radiologists reviewed images. Each lesion was registered as "detected" or "not detected." A semiparametric logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The decrease in radiation dose from 100% to 50%, 25%, or 12% had no effect on lesion detection in the lungs. The decrease in radiation dose had an effect on lesion detection in the mediastinum, as probabilities deteriorated from the 100% dose to the 50%, 25%, and 12% dose with each step. Probabilities of smaller detection rates when compared with that of the reference category (100% dose) were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.86, 0.012) for the 50% dose, 1 (CI: -0.59, -0.61) for the 25% dose, and 1 (CI: -2.41, -1.22) for the 12% dose. CIs for the effects were on the log(odds). Detection probability decreased with smaller and lower signal intensity lesions.

CONCLUSION

At clinical digital radiography, dose reduction resulted in decreased observer detection of simulated nodules in the mediastinum but not in the lungs.