Effects of CT Irradiation on Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices1

Interference of cardiac implantable electronic devices and computed tomography imaging in the current era with a phantom model

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac implantable electronic devices are used in patients with cardiac rhythm disorders. Computed tomography irradiation is not prohibited for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, despite adverse events being reported. Hence, appropriate preparation and knowledge are required before computed tomography irradiation can be carried out in these patients. Since there is limited knowledge or literature about the influence of computed tomography irradiation in cases with recent cardiac implantable electronic devices, we aimed to evaluate the adverse events and elucidate the necessary and sufficient safety measures associated with this therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We placed cardiac implantable electronic devices on an anthropomorphic phantom model and observed their electrical activity in electrograms, while various protocols of computed tomography irradiation were implemented and adverse events evaluated. Oversensing with pauses of up to 3.2 s was observed in standard computed tomography protocols, but ventricular tachyarrhythmia or other clinically significant events could not be confirmed. Oversensing with pauses of up to 8.0 s was observed and ventricular tachyarrhythmia was detected in the maximum-dose protocols. However, treatments such as antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmia were not observed because of their absence.

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography irradiation for patients using cardiac implantable electronic devices is highly unlikely to cause clinically significant adverse events with the device settings and computed tomography protocols currently being used. Changing or monitoring the device settings routinely before computed tomography irradiation is not necessarily required for most patients.

Impact of X-Ray Exposure From Computed Tomography on Wearable Insulin Delivery Devices

BACKGROUND

To investigate the impact of radiation exposure from a computed tomography (CT) scanner on the functional integrity of a wearable insulin delivery system.

METHODS

A total of 160 Omnipods and four personal diabetes managers (PDMs) were evenly divided into four groups: (1) control group (no radiation exposure), (2) typical radiation exposure group, (3) 4× typical radiation exposure group, and (4) scatter radiation group. Pods were attached to an anthropomorphic torso phantom on the abdomen (direct irradiation) or shoulder (scatter radiation) region. A third-generation dual-source CT scanner was used to scan the pods using either a typical exposure (used for routine CT abdominal study of a median size patient) or 4× typical exposure. A manufacturer-recommended 20-step functionality test was performed for all 160 Omnipods.

RESULTS

The radiation dose (measured in volume CT Dose index) was 16 mGy for a typical exposure, and 64 mGy for 4× typical exposure. The scatter radiation is less than 0.1 mGy. All Pods passed the functionality test except one pod in the scatter radiation group, which sounded an alarm due to occlusion. The blockage to the fluid was due to a kink in the soft cannula, a mechanical issue not caused by the radiation exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests X-ray exposure levels used in radiological imaging procedures do not negatively impact the functional integrity of Omnipods. This finding may support the potential for the manufacturer to remove the warning that patients should remove the Pod for X-ray imaging procedures, which will have a huge impact on patient care.

Safety Considerations in MRI and CT

OBJECTIVE

MRI and CT are indispensable imaging modalities for the evaluation of patients with neurologic disease, and each is particularly well suited to address specific clinical questions. Although both of these imaging modalities have excellent safety profiles in clinical use as a result of concerted and dedicated efforts, each has potential physical and procedural risks that the practitioner should be aware of, which are described in this article.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Recent advancements have been made in understanding and reducing safety risks with MR and CT. The magnetic fields in MRI create risks for dangerous projectile accidents, radiofrequency burns, and deleterious interactions with implanted devices, and serious patient injuries and deaths have occurred. Ionizing radiation in CT may be associated with shorter-term deterministic effects on biological tissues at extremely high doses and longer-term stochastic effects related to mutagenesis and carcinogenesis at low doses. The cancer risk of radiation exposure in diagnostic CT is considered extremely low, and the benefit of an appropriately indicated CT examination far outweighs the potential risk. Continuing major efforts are centered on improving image quality and the diagnostic power of CT while concurrently keeping radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

An understanding of these MRI and CT safety issues that are central to contemporary radiology practice is essential for the safe and effective treatment of patients with neurologic disease.

Incidence and Predictors of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Malfunction with Radiotherapy Treatment

Aims: To investigate the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) malfunction with radiotherapy (RT) treatment and assess predictors of CIED malfunction. Methods: A 6-year retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RT with CIED identified through the radiation oncology electronic database. Clinical, RT (cumulative dose, dose per fraction, beam energy, beam energy dose, and anatomical area of RT) and CIED details (type, manufacturer, and device malfunction) were collected from electronic medical records. Results: We identified 441 patients with CIED who underwent RT. CIED encountered a permanent pacemaker (PPM) (78%), cardiac resynchronization therapy—pacing (CRT-P) (2%), an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (10%), and a CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) (10%). The mean cumulative dose of RT was 36 gray (Gy) (IQR 1.8–80 Gy) and the most common beam energy used was photon ≥10 megavolt (MV) with a median dose of 7 MV (IQR 5–18 MV). We further identified 17 patients who had CIED malfunction with RT. This group had a higher cumulative RT dose of 42.5 Gy (20–77 Gy) and a photon dose of 14 MV (12–18 MV). None of the malfunctions resulted in clinical symptoms. Using logistic regression, the predictors of CIED malfunction were photon beam energy use ≥10 MV (OR 5.73; 95% CI, 1.58–10.76), anatomical location of RT above the diaphragm (OR 5.2, 95% CI, 1.82–15.2), and having a CIED from the ICD group (OR 4.6, 95% CI, 0.75–10.2). Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of predictors of CIED malfunction with RT to ensure the safety of patients.

Current Clinical Practice in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) Undergoing Radiotherapy (RT)

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) undergoing radiotherapy (RT) are more common due to ageing of the population. With newer CIEDs implementing the complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology which allows the miniaturisation of CIED, it is also more susceptible to RT. Effects of RT on CIED ranges from device interference, device operational/memory errors of permanent damage. These malfunctions can cause life threatening clinical effects. Cumulative dose is not the only component of RT that causes CIED malfunction, as neutron use and dose rate effect also affects CIEDs. The management of this patient cohort in clinical practice is inconsistent due to lack of a consistent guideline from manufacturers and physician specialty societies. Our review will focus on the current clinical practice and the recent updated guidelines of managing patients with CIED undergoing RT. We aim to simplify the evidence and provide a simple and easy to use guide based on the recent guidelines.

Current clinical practice in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing radiotherapy: a literature review

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) undergoing radiotherapy (RT) are more common due to the ageing of the population. With newer CIEDs' implementing the complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology which allows the miniaturization of CIED, it is also more susceptible to RT. Effects of RT on CIED ranges from device interference, device operational/memory errors of permanent damage. These malfunctions can cause life-threatening clinical effects. Cumulative dose is not the only component of RT that causes CIED malfunction, as neutron use and dose rate effect also affects CIEDs. The management of this patient cohort in clinical practice is inconsistent due to the lack of a consistent guideline from manufacturers and physician specialty societies. Our review will focus on the current clinical practice and the recently updated guidelines of managing patients with CIED undergoing RT. We aim to simplify the evidence and provide a simple and easy to use guide based on the recent guidelines.

Initial testing of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta Onpro) on-body injector in multiple radiological imaging environments

Purpose

An increasing number of implantable or external devices can impact whether patients can receive radiological imaging examinations. This study examines and tests the Neulasta (pegfilgrastim) Onpro on‐body injector in multiple imaging environments.

Methods

The injector was analyzed for four imaging modalities with testing protocols and strategies developed for each modality. In x‐ray and computed tomography (CT), scans with much higher exposure than clinical protocols were performed with the device attached to an anthropomorphic phantom. The device was monitored until the completion of drug delivery. For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the device was assessed using a hand‐held magnet and underwent the magnetically induced displacement testing in a 1.5T clinical MRI scanner room. For ultrasound, magnetic field changes were measured around an ultrasound scanner system with three transducers.

Results

For x‐ray and CT no sign of device error was identified during or after the high radiation exposure scans. Drug delivery was completed at expected timing with expected volume. For MRI the device showed significant attractive force towards the hand‐held magnet and a 50‐degree deflection angle at 50 cm from the opening of the scanner bore. No further assessment from the gradient or radiofrequency field was deemed necessary. For ultrasound the maximum magnetic field change from baseline was measured to be +11.7 μT in comparison to +74.2 μT at 4 inches from a working microwave.

Conclusions

No device performance issue was identified under the extreme test conditions in x‐ray or CT. The device was found to be MR Unsafe. Magnetic field changes around an ultrasound system met the limitation set by manufacture. Patient ultrasound scanning is considered safe as long as the transducers do not inadvertently loosen the device.

Effects of high-energy photon beam radiation therapy on Jarvik 2000 LVAD: in vitro evaluation

PURPOSE

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is considered a standard care for patients with advanced heart failure. The aim of this work was to study in vitro the effects of direct exposure of the Jarvik 2000 LVAD to 10-MV photon beams.

METHODS

Jarvik 2000 pump was immersed in a siliconized box filled with deionized water. A 30 × 30 × 15 cm RW3 slabs were added forth and back to the box. A treatment plan consisting of a single direct 10 × 10 cm² field size beam was used to deliver 1000 MU at the center of the pump. During irradiation, the external Flow Maker controller and the lithium battery were positioned away from the beam. Pump parameter data (included voltage, current and frequency) were measured, recorded and analyzed for changes in pump function among baseline, pre-irradiation, during irradiation, post-irradiation and after 6 months. The whole session lasted 6 months. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the repeated measurements. X-ray radiation attenuation was also studied.

RESULTS

The parameters investigated remained stable over the 6 months; that is, no pump stops, alarms, events, operational changes or abnormalities during the discharge rate of the connected power sources, were encountered, confirmed by the Mann-Whitney U test applied to all sessions (p > 0.1). The measured X-ray attenuation differed from the calculated one by TPS by 34%.

CONCLUSION

The Jarvik 2000 resulted stable under direct X-ray beam of 10-MV energy. Its strong attenuation, however, can affect dose deposition in the pump in TPS, and it must be taken into account.

Management of radiotherapy patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators: A Report of the AAPM TG-203†

Managing radiotherapy patients with implanted cardiac devices (implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) has been a great practical and procedural challenge in radiation oncology practice. Since the publication of the AAPM TG-34 in 1994, large bodies of literature and case reports have been published about different kinds of radiation effects on modern technology implantable cardiac devices and patient management before, during, and after radiotherapy. This task group report provides the framework that analyzes the potential failure modes of these devices and lays out the methodology for patient management in a comprehensive and concise way, in every step of the entire radiotherapy process.

Potential effects of low-dose average CT on cardiac implantable electronic devices

BACKGROUND

Average CT has been shown to be more accurate than conventional helical CT in quantitation of the PET data. The risk of CT irradiation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) causing an adverse event is low and is generally outweighed by the clinical benefit of a medically indicated examination. However, irradiation of CIED over one breath cycle in cine CT scan for average CT could impose risks on a patient who is pacing dependent. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that low-dose average CT can be safe for CIED.

METHODS

A Medtronic CIED of model Protecta VR was submerged in a saline bath for a series of 4-s cine CT scans on a GE CT scanner programmed to deliver a 2-cm-wide radiation at a dose rate of 0.9 to 41.2 mGy/s to the CIED. The number of over-sensings was recorded as the interference of radiation to the CIED.

RESULTS

Dose rates ≥ 1.9 mGy/s caused over-sensing. The higher the dose rate, the more over-sensings there were. The lowest dose rate of 0.9 mGy/s did not cause any over-sensing.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose average CT at 0.9 mGy/s can be safe for a CIED patient who is pacing dependent.

Overranging and overbeaming measurement in area detector computed tomography: A method for simultaneous measurement in volume helical acquisition

Purpose

We propose a novel method to assess overbeaming and overranging, as well as the effect of reducing longitudinal exposure range, by using a dynamic z‐collimator in area detector computed tomography.

Methods and materials

A 500‐mm diameter cylindrical imaging plate was exposed by helical scanning in a dark room. The beam collimation of the helical acquisitions was set at 32 and 80 mm. Overbeaming and overranging with the dynamic z‐collimator were measured.

Results

The actual beam widths were approximately 39 and 88 mm at 32 and 80 mm collimation, respectively, and were relatively reduced owing to increased beam collimation. Overranging was 27.0 and 48.2 mm with a pitch of 0.83 and 1.49 at 32 mm collimation and 72.5 and 83.1 mm with a pitch of 0.87 and 0.99 at 80 mm collimation. The dynamic z‐collimator relatively reduced the overranging by 17.3% and 17.1% for the 32 and 80 mm collimation, respectively.

Conclusion

We devised a method to simultaneously measure overbeaming and overranging with only one helical acquisition. Although the dynamic z‐collimator reduced the overranging by approximately 17%, wider collimation widths and higher pitch settings would increase the exposure dose outside the scan range.

Reduced artifacts and improved diagnostic value of 640-slice computed tomography in patients with cardiac pacemakers

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility of 640-slice with 64-slice computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography for diagnosing coronary lesions in patients with pacemakers.

Methods

Forty-five and 50 patients with pacemakers and with suspected or known coronary artery disease underwent 64-slice (64 group) and 640-slice (640 group) CT scans, respectively. All segments of the vessels were evaluated according to the 15-segment model recommended by the American Heart Association.

Results

The incidence of moderate or severe artifacts was significantly lower (7.27% vs. 32.17%) and the diagnosable rate for coronary lesions was higher (98.91% vs. 94.19%) in the 640 compared with the 64 group. In the 64 group, the incidence of artifacts in patients with a heart rate >65 bpm (20.98%) was higher than in those with a heart rate <65 bpm (15.67%), although the difference was not significant, while the incidence of artifacts was significantly higher in patients with heart arrhythmia (21.40%) compared with in those with normal heart rhythm (15.09%).

Conclusions

Among patients with pacemakers and a higher heart rate or heart arrhythmia, 640-slice CT may be more effective than 64-slice CT for diagnosing coronary lesions, by reducing moderate and severe artifacts.

Do we need to establish guidelines for patients with neuromodulation implantable devices, including spinal cord stimulators undergoing nonspinal surgeries?

Background:

Spinal cord stimulation is currently approved to treat chronic intractable pain of the trunk and limbs. However, such implantable electronic devices are vulnerable to external electrical currents and magnetic fields. Within the hospitals and modern operating rooms (ORs), there is an abundance of electrical devices and other types of equipment that could interfere with such devices. Despite the increasing number of patients with neuromodulation implantable devices, there are no written guidelines available or consensus of cautions for such patients undergoing unrelated surgery.

Case Descriptions:

A 60-year-old female with a permanent St. Jude's spinal cord stimulator (SCS) presented for open total abdominal hysterectomy. Both the anesthesia and gynecology staffs were aware of the device presence, but were unaware of any precautions regarding intraoperative management. The device was found to be nonmagnetic resonance imaging compatible, and bipolar cautery was used instead of monopolar cautery. A 59-year-old female with a 9-year-old permanent Medtronic SCS, presented for right total hip arthroplasty. The device was switched off prior to entering the OR, bipolar cautery was used, and grounding pads were placed away from her battery site. In each case, the manufacturer's representative was contacted preoperative. Both surgeries proceeded uneventfully.

Conclusions:

The Food and Drug Administration safety information manual warns about the use of diathermy, concomitant implanted stimulation devices, lithotripsy, external defibrillation, radiation therapy, ultrasonic scanning, and high-output ultrasound, all of which can lead to permanent implant damage if not turned off prior to undertaking procedures. Lack of uniform guidelines makes intraoperative management, as well as remote anesthesia care of patients with previously implanted SCSs unsafe.

Spinal cord stimulation: a review of the safety literature and proposal for perioperative evaluation and management

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There is currently no consensus on appropriate perioperative management of patients with spinal cord stimulator implants. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered safe under strict labeling conditions. Electrocautery is generally not recommended in these patients but sometimes used despite known risks.

PURPOSE

The aim was to discuss the perioperative evaluation and management of patients with spinal cord stimulator implants.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review, summary of device labeling, and editorial were performed, regarding the safety of spinal cord stimulator devices in the perioperative setting.

METHODS

A literature review was performed, and the labeling of each Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved spinal cord stimulation system was reviewed. The literature review was performed using PubMed and the FDA website (www.fda.gov).

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging safety recommendations vary between the models. Certain systems allow for MRI of the brain to be performed, and only one system allows for MRI of the body to be performed, both under strict labeling conditions. Before an MRI is performed, it is imperative to ascertain that the system is intact, without any lead breaks or low impedances, as these can result in heating of the spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and injury to the patient. Monopolar electrocautery is generally not recommended for patients with SCS; however, in some circumstances, it is used when deemed required by the surgeon. When cautery is necessary, bipolar electrocautery is recommended. Modern electrocautery units are to be used with caution as there remains a risk of thermal injury to the tissue in contact with the SCS. As with MRI, electrocautery usage in patients with SCS systems with suspected breaks or abnormal impedances is unsafe and may cause injury to the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal cord stimulation is increasingly used in patients with pain of spinal origin, particularly to manage postlaminectomy syndrome. Knowledge of the safety concerns of SCS and appropriate perioperative evaluation and management of the SCS system can reduce risks and improve surgical planning.

Radiotherapy in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a literature review

An increasing number of patients with implantable cardiac rhythm devices undergo radiotherapy (RT) for cancer and are thereby exposed to the risk of device failure. Current safety recommendations seem to have limitations by not accounting for the risk of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators malfunctioning at low radiation doses. Besides scant knowledge about optimal safety measures, only little is known about the exact prevalence of patients with devices undergoing RT. In this review, we provide a short overview of the principles of RT and present the current evidence on the predictors and mechanisms of device malfunctions during RT. We also summarize practical recommendations from recent publications and from the industry. Strongly associated with beam energy of photon RT, device malfunctions occur at ∼3% of RT courses, posing a substantial issue in clinical practice. Malfunctions described in the literature typically consist of transient software disturbances and only seldom manifest as a permanent damage of the device. Through close cooperation between cardiologists and oncologists, a tailored individualized approach might be necessary in this patient group in waiting time for updated international guidelines in the field.

DEGRO/DGK guideline for radiotherapy in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

An increasing number of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) have cardiac implantable electronic devices [CIEDs, cardiac pacemakers (PMs) and implanted cardioverters/defibrillators (ICDs)]. Ionizing radiation can cause latent and permanent damage to CIEDs, which may result in loss of function in patients with asystole or ventricular fibrillation. Reviewing the current literature, the interdisciplinary German guideline (DEGRO/DGK) was developed reflecting patient risk according to type of CIED, cardiac condition, and estimated radiation dose to the CIED. Planning for RT should consider the CIED specifications as well as patient-related characteristics (pacing-dependent, previous ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation). Antitachyarrhythmia therapy should be suspended in patients with ICDs, who should be under electrocardiographic monitoring with an external defibrillator on stand-by. The beam energy should be limited to 6 (to 10) MV CIEDs should never be located in the beam, and the cumulative scatter radiation dose should be limited to 2 Gy. Personnel must be able to respond adequately in the case of a cardiac emergency and initiate basic life support, while an emergency team capable of advanced life support should be available within 5 min. CIEDs need to be interrogated 1, 3, and 6 months after the last RT due to the risk of latent damage.

Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy

A formal communication process was established and evaluated for the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) receiving radiation therapy (RT). Methods to estimate dose to the CIED were evaluated for their appropriateness in the management of these patients. A retrospective, institutional review board (IRB) approved study of 69 patients with CIEDs treated with RT between 2005 and 2011 was performed. The treatment sites, techniques, and the estimated doses to the CIEDs were analyzed and compared to estimates from published peripheral dose (PD) data and three treatment planning systems (TPSs) — UMPlan, Eclipse's AAA and Acuros algorithms. When measurements were indicated, radiation doses to the CIEDs ranged from 0.01–5.06 Gy. Total peripheral dose estimates based on publications differed from TLD measurements by an average of 0.94 Gy (0.05–4.49 Gy) and 0.51 Gy (0–2.74 Gy) for CIEDs within 2.5 cm and between 2.5 and 10 cm of the treatment field edge, respectively. Total peripheral dose estimates based on three TPSs differed from measurements by an average of 0.69 Gy (0.02–3.72 Gy) for CIEDs within 2.5 cm of the field edge. Of the 69 patients evaluated in this study, only two with defibrillators experienced a partial reset of their device during treatment. Based on this study, few CIED‐related events were observed during RT. The only noted correlation with treatment parameters for these two events was beam energy, as both patients were treated with high‐energy photon beams (16 MV). Differences in estimated and measured CIED doses were observed when using published PD data and TPS calculations. As such, we continue to follow conservative guidelines and measure CIED doses when the device is within 10 cm of the field or the estimated dose is greater than 2 Gy for pacemakers or 1 Gy for defibrillators.

PACS number: 87.55.N‐

Management of radiation oncology patients with a pacemaker or ICD: a new comprehensive practical guideline in The Netherlands. Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO)

Current clinical guidelines for the management of radiotherapy patients having either a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (both CIEDs: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices) do not cover modern radiotherapy techniques and do not take the patient’s perspective into account. Available data on the frequency and cause of CIED failure during radiation therapy are limited and do not converge. The Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO) initiated a multidisciplinary task group consisting of clinical physicists, cardiologists, radiation oncologists, pacemaker and ICD technologists to develop evidence based consensus guidelines for the management of CIED patients. CIED patients receiving radiotherapy should be categorised based on the chance of device failure and the clinical consequences in case of failure. Although there is no clear cut-off point nor a clear linear relationship, in general, chances of device failure increase with increasing doses. Clinical consequences of device failures like loss of pacing, carry the most risks in pacing dependent patients. Cumulative dose and pacing dependency have been combined to categorise patients into low, medium and high risk groups. Patients receiving a dose of less than 2 Gy to their CIED are categorised as low risk, unless pacing dependent since then they are medium risk. Between 2 and 10 Gy, all patients are categorised as medium risk, while above 10 Gy every patient is categorised as high risk. Measures to secure patient safety are described for each category. This guideline for the management of CIED patients receiving radiotherapy takes into account modern radiotherapy techniques, CIED technology, the patients’ perspective and the practical aspects necessary for the safe management of these patients. The guideline is implemented in The Netherlands in 2012 and is expected to find clinical acceptance outside The Netherlands as well.

Cardiac CT: Imaging of and Through Cardiac Devices

For patients with cardiac devices, cardiac computed tomography (CT) remains the mainstay for imaging due to its superior resolution as compared with echocardiography and nuclear studies and no contraindication to metal as with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. This review focuses on the evaluation and pitfalls of coronary arterial imaging in patients with devices, such as pacemakers, implantable defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), as well as complications such as lead perforation and safety concerns of CT interference. We discuss both pre- and post-procedural CRT assessment for coronary venous imaging and pre-procedural myocardial scar assessment to localize regions of scar and peri-infarct zone to facilitate ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with devices. We describe potential new research on dyssynchrony and integration with myocardial scar and site of latest activation for patients with or being considered for CRT. We detail the utility of CT for the assessment of proper function and complications in patients with left ventricular assist device implantation.

Proton dose perturbations caused by high-voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators

An increasing number of patients undergoing proton radiotherapy have cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs). We recently encountered a situation in which a high‐voltage coil on a lead from an implanted cardiac defibrillator was located within the clinical treatment volume for a patient receiving proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. To study the effects of the lead on the dose delivery, we placed a high‐Z CIED lead at both the center and the distal edge of a clinical spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) in a water phantom, in both a stationary position and with the lead moving in a periodic pattern to simulate cardiorespiratory movement. We then calculated planned doses using a commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS), and compared them with the doses delivered in the phantom, measured using radiographic film. Dose profiles from TPS‐calculated and measured dose distributions showed large pertubrations in the delivered proton dose in the vicinity of the CIED lead when it was not moving. The TPS predicted perturbations up to 20% and measurements revealed perturbations up to 35%. However, the perturbations were less than 3% when the lead was moving. Greater dose perturbations were seen when the lead was placed at the distal edge of the SOBP than when it was placed in the center of the SOBP. We conclude that although cardiorespiratory motion of the lead mitigates some of the perturbations, the effects of the leads should be considered and steps taken to reduce these effects during the treatment planning process.

PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐,87.55.ne, 87.85.M

Electromagnetic interference and implanted cardiac devices: the medical environment (part II)

Electromagnetic interference produced by medical equipment can interact with implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. The most commonly observed interaction is in the operating room with electrosurgery. The risk of interactions can often be mitigated by close communication between the cardiac-device specialist and the anesthesiology/surgical team to develop a patient-specific strategy that accounts for factors such as type of device, type of surgery, and whether the patient is pacemaker dependent. Although magnetic resonance imaging should generally not be used in patients with implanted cardiac devices, several published guidelines provide strategies and recommendations for managing risks if magnetic resonance imaging is required with no suitable diagnostic alternatives. Other common sources of electromagnetic interference in the medical environment are ionizing radiation and left ventricular assist devices.

[Partial electrical reset of CT irradiation on implantable cardiac devices: relationship between reset and tube voltage, tube current, and rotation time]

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between partial electrical reset (PER) and CT scan parameters (tube voltage, tube current, rotation time, and product of tube current and rotation time in mAs). A cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (Insync 8040, Medtronic Inc., Tokyo) and 320 area detector CT scanner (Aquilion ONE, Toshiba medical systems, Otawara, Japan) with volume scan were used. The pacemaker was put in DDD mode. The PERs were interpreted using both the programmer's wave forms and error messages. The exposure was repeated 5 times per CT setting. The pacemaker was placed on the anterior wall and upper side of a chest phantom. Each CT scan was performed using the following parameters: tube voltage of 80, 100, 120, and 135 kV; tube current of 50-550 mA; and rotation time of 0.35-1.5 s. PERs were observed at 100, 120, and 135 kV, and more PERs were observed as the tube voltage increased. The PER tube current decreased as the rotation time was increased. In contrast, the PER tube current and rotation time product (mAs) increased as the rotation time was increased. More specifically, the radiation dose rate was the affected factor of the PERs. To avoid PER of pacemakers, CT scan parameters with lower radiation dose rates (low rather than high tube current and rotational time) is recommended. In conclusion, our results will help with CT scans of patients who have implantable cardiac devices (included pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators).

Computed tomography in patients with cardiac pacemakers: difficulties and solutions

The presence of cardiac pacemaker systems may significantly limit interpretation of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) images. In 80 patients (45 men; aged 69.5 ± 13.4) with previously implanted anti-arrhythmic devices, a 64-slice CT (Aquilion-64) was performed. In 61 patients (76.3%), ECG gating was used (coronaries visualization) and in 19 patients (23.7%) without ECG gating (not coronaries visualization). In all 19 patients without ECG gating MSCT images were diagnostic. In 37 (60.6%) patients of 61, there was no problem with gating process and image quality was diagnostic. In 24 (39.4%) with visible spikes in the ECG-gating group, there were difficulties in differentiating the R spike from an artificial spike (unipolar pacing) by MSCT software. In 15 patients (24.6%) after reprogramming, it was possible to obtain good quality images. In nine (14.7%) patients, it was not possible to reprogram devices due to old unipolar leads, but in two cases (3.3%), ECG gating was corrected manually and good image quality was obtained. In seven (11.5%) patients, it was not possible to perform ECG gating. The ECG gating process was identified as the main cause of the imaging problems. Bipolar leads working as bipolar pacing seem to be necessary to perform MSCT with ECG gating. A unipolar system lead may cause serious problems with reconstructions.

X-ray radiation causes electromagnetic interference in implantable cardiac pacemakers

BACKGROUND

X-rays are not thought to cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) in implantable cardiac pacemakers. However, x-ray radiation during computed tomography (CT) scanning has been reported to cause EMI in some implantable cardiac pacemakers. The objectives of this study were to identify the location within the pacemakers where x-ray radiation causes EMI and to investigate the association of EMI with the x-ray radiation conditions.

METHODS

We verified the location where x-ray radiation caused EMI using a CT scanner and conventional radiographic x-ray equipment. An inhibition test and an asynchronous test were performed using five types of implantable cardiac pacemakers.

RESULTS

X-ray radiation inhibited the pacing pulses of four types of implantable cardiac pacemakers when the body of each implantable cardiac pacemaker, containing a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS), was scanned using a CT scanner. We confirmed that x-ray-induced EMI depends on the x-ray radiation conditions, that is, the tube voltage, tube current, x-ray dose, and direction of x-ray radiation, as well as the sensing thresholds of the implantable cardiac pacemakers.

CONCLUSIONS

X-ray radiation caused EMI in some implantable cardiac pacemakers, probably because the CMOS component was irradiated. The occurrence of EMI depended on the pacemaker model, sensing threshold of the pacemaker, and x-ray radiation conditions.

Update on tetralogy of Fallot for the adult cardiologist including a brief historical and surgical perspective

There has been a steady rise in the prevalence of severe congenital heart disease (CHD) in adults because of improved treatment and survival during childhood. This has resulted in a shift in CHD morbidity and mortality beyond 18 years of age. The healthcare community must be prepared to meet this new challenge. Adult cardiologists need to be aware of common CHD, such as tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), as they will encounter adults with this CHD in their practice. With routine monitoring, cardiac imaging, early intervention, and treatment as highlighted in this report, continued improvement in the long-term fitness and avoidance of late complications for adult TOF patient is anticipated.

Absorbed dose and dose rate using the Varian OBI 1.3 and 1.4 CBCT system

According to published data, the absorbed dose used for a CBCT image acquisition with Varian OBI v1.3 can be as high as 100 mGy. In 2008 Varian released a new OBI version (v1.4), which promised to reduce the imaging dose. In this study, absorbed doses used for CBCT image acquisitions with the default irradiation techniques of Varian OBI v1.3 and v1.4 are measured.

TLDs are used to derive dose distributions at three planes inside an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition, point doses and dose profiles inside a ‘stack’ of three CTDI body phantoms are measured using a new solid state detector, the CT Dose Profiler. With the CT Dose Profiler, the individual pulses from the X‐ray tube are also studied. To verify the absorbed dose measured with the CT Dose Profiler, it is compared to TLD. The image quality is evaluated using a Catphan phantom.

For OBI v1.3, doses measured in transverse planes of the Alderson phantom range between 64 mGy and 144 mGy. The average dose is around 100 mGy. For OBI v1.4, doses measured in transverse planes of the Alderson phantom range between 1 mGy and 51 mGy. Mean doses range between 3‐35 mGy depending on CBCT mode. CT Dose Profiler data agree with TLD measurements in a CTDI phantom within the uncertainty of the TLD measurements (estimated SD ±10%). Instantaneous dose rate at the periphery of the phantom can be higher than 20 mGy/s, which is 10 times the dose rate at the center. The spatial resolution in v1.4 is not as high as in v1.3.

In conclusion, measurements show that the imaging doses for default modes in Varian OBI v1.4 CBCT system are significantly lower than in v1.3. The CT Dose Profiler is proven fast and accurate for CBCT applications.

PACS number: 87.53.Bn

Establishing radiation therapy treatment planning effects involving implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Recent improvements to the functionality and stability of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter‐defibrillators involve changes that include efficient battery power consumption and radiation hardened electrical circuits. Manufacturers have also pursued MRI‐compatibility for these devices. While such newer models of pacemakers and cardioverter‐defibrillators are similar in construction to previously marketed devices – even for the recent MRI‐compatible designs currently in clinical trials – there is increased interest now with regard to radiation therapy dose effects when a device is near or directly in the field of radiation. Specifically, the limitation on dose to the device from therapeutic radiation beams is being investigated for a possible elevation in limiting dose above 200 cGy. We present here the first‐ever study that evaluates dosimetric effects from implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators in high energy X‐ray beams from a medical accelerator. Treatment plan simulations were analyzed for four different pacemakers and five different implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators and intercompared with direct measurements from a miniature ionization chamber in water. All defibrillators exhibited the same results and all pacemakers were seen to display the same consequences, within only a a±1.8% deviation for all X‐ray energies studied. Attenuation, backscatter, and lateral scatter were determined to be −13.4%, 2.1% and 1.5% at 6 MV, and −6.1%, 3.1% and 5.1% at 18 MV for the defibrillator group. For the pacemaker group, this research showed results of −15.9%, 2.8% and 2.5% at 6 MV, and −9.4%, 3.4% and 5.7% at 18 MV, respectively. Limited results were discovered from scattering processes through computer modeling. Strong verification from measurements was concluded with respect to simulating attenuation characteristics. For IP and ICD leads, measured dose changes were less than 4%, existing as attenuation processes only, and invariant with regard to X‐ray energy.

PACS number: 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Dq, 87.53.Tf, 87.66.Jj

Computed Tomography Scan and ICD Interaction

Although it has been considered a safe procedure, computed tomography scanning uses high doses of radiation and can cause malfunctioning in those patients with ICD when the radiation is directly incident on the device. We present a case of ventricular oversensing during a thoracic computed tomography.

Safety and imaging quality of MRI in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease patients with pacemakers

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard of care in evaluating many disease processes. Given concerns about device damage or movement, programming changes, lead heating, inappropriate pacing, and image artifact, MRI is contraindicated in pacemaker patients. Despite this, studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy of MRI in adults with acquired heart disease and endocardial pacing leads. We sought to evaluate MRI use in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients with predominantly epicardial pacing leads.

METHODS

From July 2007 to October 2008, MRI (1.5 Tesla) was performed in 11 patients without alternative imaging modality who were not pacemaker dependent or possessing abandoned leads. Pacing was disabled during MRI. An electrophysiologist monitored electrocardiogram and hemodynamic parameters throughout each study. Device and lead function were evaluated before and after MRI, and at subsequent clinic visits.

RESULTS

Eleven MRIs (four cardiac, seven noncardiac) were performed in eight patients. Mean patient age was 16.5 +/- 9.2 years (range 1.7-24.5) with five patients under the age of 16 years. Diagnoses included structural CHD in six patients and long QT syndrome and congenital heart block in one each. There were three dual- and five single- (three atrial, two ventricular) chamber devices, two endocardial, and nine epicardial leads. No inappropriate pacing or significant change in generator or lead parameters was noted. All MRI studies were of diagnostic quality.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic quality MRI can be performed safely in nonpacemaker-dependent CHD patients with predominantly epicardial leads. Further studies will define safe practice measures in this population, as well as in CHD patients with pacemaker dependency.