1
|
Farber R, Houssami N, McGeechan K, Barratt A, Bell KJL. Breast Cancer Stage and Size Detected with Film versus Digital Mammography in New South Wales, Australia: A Population-Based Study Using Routinely Collected Data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:671-680. [PMID: 38407377 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital mammography has replaced film mammography in breast-screening programs globally, including Australia. This led to an increase in the rate of detection, but whether there was increased detection of clinically important cancers is uncertain. METHODS In this population-wide retrospective cohort study in New South Wales, Australia spanning 2004 to 2016 and including 4,631,656 screens, there were 22,965 cancers in women screened with film (n = 11,040) or digital mammography (n = 11,925). We examined the change in tumor characteristics overall and how these rates changed over time, accounting for changes in background rates using an interrupted time-series. Comparisons were made with unscreened women (n = 26,326) during this time. RESULTS We found increased detection of in situ cancer (3.36 per 10,000 screens), localized invasive, and smaller-sized breast cancers attributable to the change in mammography technology, whereas screen-detected intermediate-sized and metastatic breast cancers decreased. Rates of early-stage and intermediate-sized interval cancers increased, and late-stage (-1.62 per 10,000 screens) and large interval cancers decreased. In unscreened women, there were small increases in the temporal trends of cancers across all stages. CONCLUSIONS At least some of the increased detection of smaller early-stage cancers may have translated into a reduction in larger and late-stage cancers, indicating beneficial detection of cancers that would have otherwise progressed. However, the increased detection of smaller early-stage and small cancers may also have increased over-diagnosis of lesions that would otherwise have not caused harm. IMPACT Robust evaluation of potential benefits and harms is needed after changes to screening programs. See related In the Spotlight, p. 638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Farber
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katy J L Bell
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farber R, Marinovich ML, Pinna A, Houssami N, McGeechan K, Barratt A, Bell KJL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic characteristics for breast cancers in populations with digital vs film mammography indicate the transition may have increased both early detection and overdiagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 171:111339. [PMID: 38570078 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Film mammography has been replaced by digital mammography in breast screening programs globally. This led to a small increase in the rate of detection, but whether the detection of clinically important cancers increased is uncertain. We aimed to assess the impact on tumor characteristics of screen-detected and interval breast cancers. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We searched seven databases from inception to October 08, 2023, for publications comparing film and digital mammography within the same population of asymptomatic women at population (average) risk of breast cancer. We recorded reported tumor characteristics and assessed risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool. We synthesized results using meta-analyses of random effects. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included in the analysis from 8 countries, including 11,592,225 screening examinations (8,117,781 film; 3,474,444 digital). There were no differences in tumor size, morphology, grade, node status, receptor status, or stage in the pooled differences for screen-detected and interval invasive cancer tumor characteristics. There were statistically significant increases in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) across all grades: 0.05 (0.00-0.11), 0.14 (0.05-0.22), and 0.19 (0.05-0.33) per 1000 screens for low, intermediate, and high-grade DCIS, respectively. There were similar (non-statistically significant) increases in screen-detected invasive cancer across all grades. CONCLUSION The increased detection of all grades of DCIS and invasive cancer may indicate both increased early detection of more aggressive disease and increased overdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Farber
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Michael L Marinovich
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Audrey Pinna
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; Department of medical imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - Katy J L Bell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim H, Choi JS, Kim K, Ko ES, Ko EY, Han BK. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:7186-7198. [PMID: 37188881 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09692-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) can improve radiologists' performance when used to support radiologists' interpretation of digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. METHODS A retrospective database search identified 3158 asymptomatic Korean women who consecutively underwent screening DM between January and December 2019 without AI-CAD support, and screening DM between February and July 2020 with image interpretation aided by AI-CAD in a tertiary referral hospital using single reading. Propensity score matching was used to match the DM with AI-CAD group in a 1:1 ratio with the DM without AI-CAD group according to age, breast density, experience level of the interpreting radiologist, and screening round. Performance measures were compared with the McNemar test and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS A total of 1579 women who underwent DM with AI-CAD were matched with 1579 women who underwent DM without AI-CAD. Radiologists showed higher specificity (96% [1500 of 1563] vs 91.6% [1430 of 1561]; p < 0.001) and lower abnormal interpretation rates (AIR) (4.9% [77 of 1579] vs 9.2% [145 of 1579]; p < 0.001) with AI-CAD than without. There was no significant difference in the cancer detection rate (CDR) (AI-CAD vs no AI-CAD, 8.9 vs 8.9 per 1000 examinations; p = 0.999), sensitivity (87.5% vs 77.8%; p = 0.999), and positive predictive value for biopsy (PPV3) (35.0% vs 35.0%; p = 0.999) according to AI-CAD support. CONCLUSIONS AI-CAD increases the specificity for radiologists without decreasing sensitivity as a supportive tool in the single reading of DM for breast cancer screening. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This study shows that AI-CAD could improve the specificity of radiologists' DM interpretation in the single reading system without decreasing sensitivity, suggesting that it can benefit patients by reducing false positive and recall rates. KEY POINTS • In this retrospective-matched cohort study (DM without AI-CAD vs DM with AI-CAD), radiologists showed higher specificity and lower AIR when AI-CAD was used to support decision-making in DM screening. • CDR, sensitivity, and PPV for biopsy did not differ with and without AI-CAD support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haejung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Ji Soo Choi
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Department of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Data Convergence & Future Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Sook Ko
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Eun Young Ko
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Boo-Kyung Han
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hong S, Song SY, Park B, Suh M, Choi KS, Jung SE, Kim MJ, Lee EH, Lee CW, Jun JK. Effect of Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of More than 8 Million Korean Women. Radiology 2019; 294:247-255. [PMID: 31793847 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) has been accepted as a superior modality for breast cancer screening compared with conventional screen-film mammography (SFM), especially in women younger than 50 years or with dense breasts. Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of FFDM for breast cancer screening. Materials and Methods Data from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 in the database from a nationwide breast cancer screening program linked with the national cancer registry were retrospectively analyzed. The study included Korean women aged 40-79 years who had undergone screening mammography with SFM, computed radiography (CR), or FFDM. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and absolute and relative differences among these modalities were calculated, followed by pairwise comparison tests with multiple testing corrections. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were also estimated and compared by using the DeLong method with Bonferroni correction. Results Among the 8 482 803 women included (mean age, 55 years ± 10), 34.4% (2 920 279 of 8 482 803), 51.7% (4 385 807 of 8 482 803), and 13.9% (1 176 717 of 8 482 803) underwent SFM, CR, and FFDM, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV were higher for FFDM than for SFM (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.62, 1.95] for sensitivity and 1.36 [95% CI: 1.29, 1.43] for PPV) and CR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70 [95% CI: 1.56, 1.85] for sensitivity and 1.26 [95% CI: 1.20, 1.32] for PPV), whereas specificity was lower with FFDM. The overall AUC for FFDM was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.81), which was higher than that for SFM (0.75 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.76]) and CR (0.76 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.76]). P < .05 was found for differences in sensitivity, PPV, and AUC among modalities overall and in most of the subgroups of age, breast density, and screening round. Conclusion Full-field digital mammography allows better discrimination or prediction of breast cancer in the general female population than screen-film mammography or computed radiography, regardless of age, breast density, or screening round. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seri Hong
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Soo Yeon Song
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Boyoung Park
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Mina Suh
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Kui Son Choi
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Seung Eun Jung
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Min Jung Kim
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Eun Hye Lee
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Chan Wha Lee
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| | - Jae Kwan Jun
- From the National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea (S.H., S.Y.S., B.P., M.S., K.S.C., J.K.J.); Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (K.S.C., J.K.J.); Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.E.J.); Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.K.); Department of Radiology, Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea (E.H.L.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea (C.W.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoon JH, Han K, Koh J, Kim GR, Kim HJ, Park YM, Youk JH, Chung J, Chae IH, Choi EJ, Moon HJ. Outcomes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Detection Modality: A Multicenter Study Comparing Recurrence Between Mammography and Breast US. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2019; 45:2623-2633. [PMID: 31351671 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.06.420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether disease recurrence and intrinsic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are associated with the imaging method of detection in asymptomatic women. This multicenter, retrospective study included 844 women treated for asymptomatic DCIS who had pre-operative mammography and breast ultrasonography (US) studies available. Of the 844 women, 25 (3.0%) developed recurrences. Patients in the US group had significantly lower 5- and 10-y recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates compared with patients in the mammography group (p = 0.011). US-detected DCIS showed significantly lower 5-and 10-y RFS rates compared with mammography-detected DCIS in patients <50 y or with mammographically dense breasts (p = 0.002 and 0.002, respectively). US as the detection modality (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.451; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.530, 12.950; p = 0.006) and HER2 positivity (HR: 4.036; 95% CI: 1.438; 11.330; p = 0.008) were significantly associated with recurrence. We concluded that US as the detection modality and HER2 positivity were significantly associated with recurrence in patients treated for asymptomatic DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Hyun Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jieun Koh
- Department of Radiology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Ga Ram Kim
- Department of Radiology, Inha University, College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hye Jung Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Young Mi Park
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Youk
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Chung
- Department of Radiology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Hye Chae
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eun Jung Choi
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Chonbuk National University, Medical School, Jeollabuk-do, Korea
| | - Hee Jung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes? Eur J Radiol 2018; 110:81-87. [PMID: 30599878 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate how breast density affects screening performance indicators in a digital mammography context. METHODS We assessed the effect of breast density over the screen-detected and interval cancers rates, false-positives, specificity, sensitivity, recall rate, positive predictive value of recall (PPV-1), and PPV of invasive tests (PPV-2). Radiologists classified breast density using the BIRADS System. We used generalized estimating equations to account for within-woman correlation by means of the robust Huber-White variance estimator. RESULTS We included 177,164 women aged 50-69 years who underwent 499,251 digital mammograms from 2004 to 2015 in Spain. According to the fibroglandular tissue percentage, 24.7% of mammograms were classified as BI-RADS 1 (<25% glandular), 54.7% as BI-RADS 2 (25-50% glandular), 14.0% as BI-RADS 3 (51-75% glandular) and 6.6% as BI-RADS 4 (>75% glandular). Overall, women with BI-RADS 3 had the highest screen-detected cancer rate (5.9 per 1000) and BI-RADS 4 the highest interval cancer rate (2.4 per 1000). Sensitivity decreased from 89.2% in women with BI-RADS 1 to 67.9% in BI-RADS 4. Both PPV-1 and PPV-2 decreased from 10.4% to 5.7% and from 49.8% to 32.4% in women with BI-RADS 1 and BI-RADS 4, respectively. Women aged 60-69 years with BI-RADS 4 had the lowest sensitivity (54.9%) and the highest interval cancer rate (3.8 per 1000). CONCLUSIONS Performance screening measures are negatively affected by breast density falling to a lower sensitivity and PPV, and higher interval cancer rate as breast density increases. Particularly women aged 60-69 years with >75% glandular breasts had the worst results and therefore may be candidates for screening using other technologies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Roubidoux MA, Shih-Pei Wu P, Nolte ELR, Begay JA, Joe AI. Availability of prior mammograms affects incomplete report rates in mobile screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 171:667-673. [PMID: 29951970 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4861-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mobile mammography can improve access to screening mammography in rural areas and underserved populations. We evaluated the frequency of incomplete reports in mobile mammography screening and the relationships between prior mammograms and recall rates. METHODS The frequency of incomplete mammogram reports, the subgroups of those needing prior comparison mammograms, recalls for additional imaging, and availability of prior mammograms of a mobile screening mammography unit were compared with fixed site mammography from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009. All mobile unit mammograms were full field digital mammography (FFDM). Differences between rates of recall, incomplete reports, and availability of prior mammograms were calculated using the Chi-Square statistic. RESULTS Of 2640 mobile mammography cases, 21.9% (578) reports were incomplete, versus 15.2% (7653) (p ≤ 0.001) of 50325 fixed site reports. Of incomplete cases, recall for additional imaging occurred among 8.3% (218) of mobile mammography reports versus 11.3% (5708) (p ≤ 0.001) of fixed site reports. Prior mammograms were needed among 13.6% (360) of mobile mammography versus 3.9% (1945) (p ≤ 0.001) of fixed site reports. Mobile mammography recall rate varied with availability of prior mammograms: 16.0% (54) when no prior mammograms, 7.6% (127) when prior mammograms were elsewhere but unavailable and 5.9% (37) when prior FFDM were immediately available (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Incomplete reports were more frequent in mobile mammography than the fixed site. The availability of prior comparison mammograms at time of interpretation decreased the rate of incomplete mammogram reports. Recall rates were higher without prior comparison mammograms and lowest when comparison FFDM mammograms were available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn A Roubidoux
- Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan, University of Michigan Health System, 2910H Taubman Center, SPC 5326, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 2902TC, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Peggy Shih-Pei Wu
- Kaiser Permanente, South Sacramento Medical Group, 6600 Bruceville Rd, 1st Floor, Sacramento, CA, 95823, USA
| | - Emily L Roen Nolte
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Greenbay Rd, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA
| | - Joel A Begay
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Annette I Joe
- Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan, University of Michigan Health System, 2910H Taubman Center, SPC 5326, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 2902TC, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sankatsing VDV, Fracheboud J, de Munck L, Broeders MJM, van Ravesteyn NT, Heijnsdijk EAM, Verbeek ALM, Otten JDM, Pijnappel RM, Siesling S, de Koning HJ. Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:256. [PMID: 29506487 PMCID: PMC5839006 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4122-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Between 2003 and 2010 digital mammography (DM) gradually replaced screen-film mammography (SFM) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme (BCSP). Previous studies showed increases in detection rate (DR) after the transition to DM. However, national interval cancer rates (ICR) have not yet been reported. Methods We assessed programme sensitivity and specificity during the transition period to DM, analysing nationwide data on screen-detected and interval cancers. Data of 7.3 million screens in women aged 49–74, between 2004 and 2011, were linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry to obtain data on interval cancers. Age-adjusted DRs, ICRs and recall rates (RR) per 1000 screens and programme sensitivity and specificity were calculated by year, age and screening modality. Results 41,662 screen-detected and 16,160 interval cancers were analysed. The DR significantly increased from 5.13 (95% confidence interval (CI):5.00–5.30) in 2004 to 6.34 (95% CI:6.15–6.47) in 2011, for both in situ (2004:0.73;2011:1.24) and invasive cancers (2004:4.42;2011:5.07), whereas the ICR remained stable (2004: 2.16 (95% CI2.06–2.25);2011: 2.13 (95% CI:2.04–2.22)). The RR changed significantly from 14.0 to 21.4. Programme sensitivity significantly increased, mainly between ages 49–59, from 70.0% (95% CI:68.9–71.2) to 74.4% (95% CI:73.5–75.4) whereas specificity slightly declined (2004:99.1% (95% CI:99.09–99.13);2011:98.5% (95% CI:98.45–98.50)). The overall DR was significantly higher for DM than for SFM (6.24;5.36) as was programme sensitivity (73.6%;70.1%), the ICR was similar (2.19;2.20) and specificity was significantly lower for DM (98.5%;98.9%). Conclusions During the transition from SFM to DM, there was a significant rise in DR and a stable ICR, leading to increased programme sensitivity. Although the recall rate increased, programme specificity remained high compared to other countries. These findings indicate that the performance of DM in a nationwide screening programme is not inferior to, and may be even better, than that of SFM. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4122-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie D V Sankatsing
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3015, CN, The Netherlands.
| | - Jacques Fracheboud
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3015, CN, The Netherlands
| | - Linda de Munck
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), PO Box 19079, Utrecht, 3501, DB, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands.,Dutch Reference Center for Screening, PO Box 6873, Nijmegen, 6503, GJ, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eveline A M Heijnsdijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3015, CN, The Netherlands
| | - André L M Verbeek
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes D M Otten
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Dutch Reference Center for Screening, PO Box 6873, Nijmegen, 6503, GJ, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), PO Box 19079, Utrecht, 3501, DB, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology & Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, PO Box 217, Enschede, 7500, AE, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3015, CN, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Timmermans L, Bleyen L, Bacher K, Van Herck K, Lemmens K, Van Ongeval C, Van Steen A, Martens P, De Brabander I, Goossens M, Thierens H. Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:3810-3819. [PMID: 28289944 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4757-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate if direct radiography (DR) performs better than screen-film mammography (SF) and computed radiography (CR) in dense breasts in a decentralized organised Breast Cancer Screening Programme. To this end, screen-detected versus interval cancers were studied in different BI-RADS density classes for these imaging modalities. METHODS The study cohort consisted of 351,532 women who participated in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme in 2009 and 2010. Information on screen-detected and interval cancers, breast density scores of radiologist second readers, and imaging modality was obtained by linkage of the databases of the Centre of Cancer Detection and the Belgian Cancer Registry. RESULTS Overall, 67% of occurring breast cancers are screen detected and 33% are interval cancers, with DR performing better than SF and CR. The interval cancer rate increases gradually with breast density, regardless of modality. In the high-density class, the interval cancer rate exceeds the cancer detection rate for SF and CR, but not for DR. CONCLUSIONS DR is superior to SF and CR with respect to cancer detection rates for high-density breasts. To reduce the high interval cancer rate in dense breasts, use of an additional imaging technique in screening can be taken into consideration. KEY POINTS • Interval cancer rate increases gradually with breast density, regardless of modality. • Cancer detection rate in high-density breasts is superior in DR. • IC rate exceeds CDR for SF and CR in high-density breasts. • DR performs better in high-density breasts for third readings and false-positives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lore Timmermans
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, QCC-Gent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Luc Bleyen
- Centrum voor Preventie en Vroegtijdige Opsporing van Kanker, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Klaus Bacher
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, QCC-Gent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Herck
- Centrum voor Preventie en Vroegtijdige Opsporing van Kanker, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kim Lemmens
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Andre Van Steen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Hubert Thierens
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, QCC-Gent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Impact of the Introduction of Digital Mammography in an Organized Screening Program on the Recall and Detection Rate. J Digit Imaging 2017; 29:235-42. [PMID: 26537932 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9843-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2012, the Reggio Emilia Breast Cancer Screening Program introduced digital mammography in all its facilities at the same time. The aim of this work is to analyze the impact of digital mammography introduction on the recall rate, detection rate, and positive predictive value. The program actively invites women aged 45-74 years. We included women screened in 2011, all of whom underwent film-screen mammography, and all women screened in 2012, all of whom underwent digital mammography. Double reading was used for all mammograms, with arbitration in the event of disagreement. A total of 42,240 women underwent screen-film mammography and 45,196 underwent digital mammography. The recall rate increased from 3.3 to 4.4% in the first year of digital mammography (relative recall adjusted by age and round 1.46, 95% CI = 1.37-1.56); the positivity rate for each individual reading, before arbitration, rose from 3 to 5.7%. The digital mammography recall rate decreased during 2012: after 12 months, it was similar to the recall rate with screen-film mammography. The detection rate was similar: 5.9/1000 and 5.2/1000 with screen-film and digital mammography, respectively (adjusted relative detection rate 0.95, 95% CI = 0.79-1.13). The relative detection rate for ductal carcinoma in situ remained the same. The introduction of digital mammography to our organized screening program had a negative impact on specificity, thereby increasing the recall rate. The effect was limited to the first 12 months after introduction and was attenuated by the double reading with arbitration. We did not observe any relevant effects on the detection rate.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ding H, Sennung D, Cho HM, Molloi S. Quantification of breast lesion compositions using low-dose spectral mammography: A feasibility study. Med Phys 2016; 43:5527. [PMID: 27782705 PMCID: PMC5035310 DOI: 10.1118/1.4962481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Revised: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The positive predictive power for malignancy can potentially be improved, if the chemical compositions of suspicious breast lesions can be reliably measured in screening mammography. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of quantifying breast lesion composition, in terms of water and lipid contents, with spectral mammography. METHODS Phantom and tissue samples were imaged with a spectral mammography system based on silicon-strip photon-counting detectors. Dual-energy calibration was performed for material decomposition, using plastic water and adipose-equivalent phantoms as the basis materials. The step wedge calibration phantom consisted of 20 calibration configurations, which ranged from 2 to 8 cm in thickness and from 0% to 100% in plastic water density. A nonlinear rational fitting function was used in dual-energy calibration of the imaging system. Breast lesion phantoms, made from various combinations of plastic water and adipose-equivalent disks, were embedded in a breast mammography phantom with a heterogeneous background pattern. Lesion phantoms with water densities ranging from 0% to 100% were placed at different locations of the heterogeneous background phantom. The water density in the lesion phantoms was measured using dual-energy material decomposition. The thickness and density of the background phantom were varied to test the accuracy of the decomposition technique in different configurations. In addition, an in vitro study was also performed using mixtures of lean and fat bovine tissue of 25%, 50%, and 80% lean weight percentages as the background. Lesions were simulated by using breast lesion phantoms, as well as small bovine tissue samples, composed of carefully weighed lean and fat bovine tissues. The water densities in tissue samples were measured using spectral mammography and compared to measurement using chemical decomposition of the tissue. RESULTS The thickness of measured and known water contents was compared for various lesion configurations. There was a good linear correlation between the measured and the known values. The root-mean-square errors in water thickness measurements were 0.3 and 0.2 mm for the plastic phantom and bovine tissue backgrounds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that spectral mammography can be used to accurately characterize breast lesion composition in terms of their equivalent water and lipid contents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanjun Ding
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - David Sennung
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Hyo-Min Cho
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| | - Sabee Molloi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Le MT, Mothersill CE, Seymour CB, McNeill FE. Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high? Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20160045. [PMID: 27187600 PMCID: PMC5124917 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The practice of investigating pathological abnormalities in the breasts of females who are asymptomatic is primarily employed using X-ray mammography. The importance of breast screening is reflected in the mortality-based benefits observed among females who are found to possess invasive breast carcinoma prior to the manifestation of clinical symptoms. It is estimated that population-based screening constitutes a 17% reduction in the breast cancer mortality rate among females affected by invasive breast carcinoma. In spite of the significant utility that screening confers in those affected by invasive cancer, limitations associated with screening manifest as potential harms affecting individuals who are free of invasive disease. Disease-free and benign tumour-bearing individuals who are subjected to diagnostic work-up following a screening examination constitute a population of cases referred to as false positives (FPs). This article discusses factors contributing to the FP rate in mammography and extends the discussion to an assessment of the consequences associated with FP reporting. We conclude that the mammography FP rate in North America is in excess based upon the observation of overtreatment of in situ lesions and the disproportionate distribution of detriment and benefit among the population of individuals recalled for diagnostic work-up subsequent to screening. To address the excessive incidence of FPs in mammography, we investigate solutions that may be employed to remediate the current status of the FP rate. Subsequently, it can be suggested that improvements in the breast-screening protocol, medical litigation risk, image interpretation software and the implementation of image acquisition modalities that overcome superimposition effects are promising solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle T Le
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carmel E Mothersill
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Colin B Seymour
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fiona E McNeill
- Medical Physics & Applied Radiation Sciences Department, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carbonaro LA, Di Leo G, Clauser P, Trimboli RM, Verardi N, Fedeli MP, Girometti R, Tafà A, Bruscoli P, Saguatti G, Bazzocchi M, Sardanelli F. Impact on the recall rate of digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography in the screening setting. A double reading experience and review of the literature. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85:808-14. [PMID: 26971428 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the impact on recall rate (RR) of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) associated with digital mammography (DM+DBT), compared to DM alone, evaluate the impact of double reading (DR) and review the literature. METHODS Ethics committees approved this multicenter study. Patients gave informed consent. Women recalled from population-based screening reading were included. Reference standard was histology and/or ≥ 1 year follow up. Negative multiple assessment was considered for patients lost at follow up. Two blinded readers (R1, R2) evaluated first DM and subsequently DM+DBT. RR, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), were calculated for R1, R2, and DR. Cohen κ and χ(2) were used for R1-R2 agreement and RR related to breast density. RESULTS We included 280 cases (41 malignancies, 66 benign lesions, and 173 negative examinations). The RR reduction was 43% (R1), 58% (R2), 43% (DR). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were: 93%, 67%, 71%, 33%, 98% for R1; 88%, 73%, 75%, 36%, 97% for R2; 98%, 55%, 61%, 27%, 99% for DR. The agreement was higher for DM+DBT (κ=0.459 versus κ=0.234). Reduction in RR was independent from breast density (p=0.992). CONCLUSION DBT was confirmed to reduce RR, as shown by 13 of 15 previous studies (reported reduction 6-82%, median 31%). This reduction is confirmed when using DR. DBT allows an increased inter-reader agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca A Carbonaro
- Radiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Leo
- Radiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Clauser
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Rubina M Trimboli
- Radiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Verardi
- Radiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria P Fedeli
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Alfredo Tafà
- Unità Operativa di Senologia, Ospedale Maggiore, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paola Bruscoli
- Unità Operativa di Senologia, Ospedale Maggiore, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianni Saguatti
- Unità Operativa di Senologia, Ospedale Maggiore, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimo Bazzocchi
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Radiology Unit, Research Hospital Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sala M, Domingo L, Macià F, Comas M, Burón A, Castells X. Does digital mammography suppose an advance in early diagnosis? Trends in performance indicators 6 years after digitalization. Eur Radiol 2014; 25:850-9. [PMID: 25257856 PMCID: PMC4328118 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3431-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Revised: 08/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To provide a complete evaluation of the long-term impact of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) on the improvement of early diagnosis in a population-based screening program. Methods We included 82,961 screen-film mammograms (SFM) and 79,031 FFDM from women aged 50–69 screened biennially from 1995–2010 in Spain and followed-up to 2012. The first screening round of the program was excluded. Rates of cancer detection, interval cancer, tumoral characteristics and other quality indicators were compared between SFM and FFDM periods using the Chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted. Results Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) significantly increased with FFDM (0.05 % vs 0.09 %; p = 0.010), along with the proportion of small invasive cancers (<20 mm) (69.37 % vs 78.90 %; p = 0.040). The false-positive rate decreased with FFDM (4.79 % vs 3.38 %; p < 0.001) without differences in the cancer detection rate (0.42 % vs 0.43 %; p = 0.685) or in the interval cancer rate (0.14 % vs 0.14 %; p = 0.816). Adjusted models showed a significant increase in the detection of DCIS in the FFDM periods. Conclusion Digitalization has supposed an improvement in early diagnosis because DCIS and small invasive cancers increased without a change in detection rate. Moreover, false-positive reduction without an increase in the interval cancer rate was confirmed. Key Points • Cancer detection did not increase after 6 years of digital mammography • Ductal carcinoma in situ rates remained higher throughout the digital period • The proportion of small invasive cancers was higher with digital mammography • We observed an improvement in early diagnosis with digital mammography • False-positive rates remained lower throughout the digital period without interval cancer increase
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Pg. Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Comas M, Arrospide A, Mar J, Sala M, Vilaprinyó E, Hernández C, Cots F, Martínez J, Castells X. Budget impact analysis of switching to digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: a discrete event simulation model. PLoS One 2014; 9:e97459. [PMID: 24832200 PMCID: PMC4022526 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 04/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the budgetary impact of switching from screen-film mammography to full-field digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program. Methods A discrete-event simulation model was built to reproduce the breast cancer screening process (biennial mammographic screening of women aged 50 to 69 years) combined with the natural history of breast cancer. The simulation started with 100,000 women and, during a 20-year simulation horizon, new women were dynamically entered according to the aging of the Spanish population. Data on screening were obtained from Spanish breast cancer screening programs. Data on the natural history of breast cancer were based on US data adapted to our population. A budget impact analysis comparing digital with screen-film screening mammography was performed in a sample of 2,000 simulation runs. A sensitivity analysis was performed for crucial screening-related parameters. Distinct scenarios for recall and detection rates were compared. Results Statistically significant savings were found for overall costs, treatment costs and the costs of additional tests in the long term. The overall cost saving was 1,115,857€ (95%CI from 932,147 to 1,299,567) in the 10th year and 2,866,124€ (95%CI from 2,492,610 to 3,239,638) in the 20th year, representing 4.5% and 8.1% of the overall cost associated with screen-film mammography. The sensitivity analysis showed net savings in the long term. Conclusions Switching to digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program saves long-term budget expense, in addition to providing technical advantages. Our results were consistent across distinct scenarios representing the different results obtained in European breast cancer screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercè Comas
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Arantzazu Arrospide
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain
- Gipuzkoa Oeste Research Unit, Hospital Alto Deba, Arrasate, Spain
| | - Javier Mar
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain
- Gipuzkoa Oeste Research Unit, Hospital Alto Deba, Arrasate, Spain
| | - Maria Sala
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain
| | - Ester Vilaprinyó
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain
- Basic Medical Sciences Department, Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRBLLEIDA)-University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Cristina Hernández
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Cots
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain
- Management Control Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Martínez
- Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Impact of the digitalisation of mammography on performance parameters and breast dose in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Eur Radiol 2014; 24:1808-19. [PMID: 24816932 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3169-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2013] [Revised: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
17
|
Ding H, Klopfer MJ, Ducote JL, Masaki F, Molloi S. Breast tissue characterization with photon-counting spectral CT imaging: a postmortem breast study. Radiology 2014; 272:731-8. [PMID: 24814180 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of breast tissue characterization in terms of water, lipid, and protein contents with a spectral computed tomographic (CT) system based on a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) photon-counting detector by using postmortem breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nineteen pairs of postmortem breasts were imaged with a CZT-based photon-counting spectral CT system with beam energy of 100 kVp. The mean glandular dose was estimated to be in the range of 1.8-2.2 mGy. The images were corrected for pulse pile-up and other artifacts by using spectral distortion corrections. Dual-energy decomposition was then applied to characterize each breast into water, lipid, and protein contents. The precision of the three-compartment characterization was evaluated by comparing the composition of right and left breasts, where the standard error of the estimations was determined. The results of dual-energy decomposition were compared by using averaged root mean square to chemical analysis, which was used as the reference standard. RESULTS The standard errors of the estimations of the right-left correlations obtained from spectral CT were 7.4%, 6.7%, and 3.2% for water, lipid, and protein contents, respectively. Compared with the reference standard, the average root mean square error in breast tissue composition was 2.8%. CONCLUSION Spectral CT can be used to accurately quantify the water, lipid, and protein contents in breast tissue in a laboratory study by using postmortem specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanjun Ding
- From the Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Medical Sciences I, B-140, Irvine, CA 92697
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hofvind S, Skaane P, Elmore JG, Sebuødegård S, Hoff SR, Lee CI. Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography. Radiology 2014; 272:52-62. [PMID: 24689858 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare performance measures before, during, and after the transition from screen-film mammography (SFM) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a population-based screening program. MATERIALS AND METHODS No institutional review board approval was required for this analysis involving anonymized data for women aged 50-69 years enrolled in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program during 1996-2010. The χ(2) test was used to examine the equality of proportions of recall rates, positive predictive value of recall examinations and of invasive procedures, in addition to rates of screening-detected and interval cancers in women initially screened with SFM and FFDM and for women subsequently screened with SFM after SFM, FFDM after SFM, and FFDM after FFDM. RESULTS The recall rate was 3.4% (47 091 of 1 391 188) for SFM and 2.9% (13 130 of 446 172) for FFDM (P < .001). The biopsy rate was 1.4% (19 776 of 1 391 188) for SFM and 1.1% (5108 of 446 172) for FFDM (P < .001). The rate of screening-detected ductal carcinoma in situ was higher (P = .019) while the rate of invasive breast cancer was lower (P < .001) for FFDM compared with those for SFM. The rate of both invasive screening-detected and interval breast cancer remained stable during the transition from SFM to FFDM (when the previous examination was SFM) and after FFDM was firmly established (when the previous examination was FFDM, >25 months after FFDM adoption) (P < .05). The positive predictive value of recall examinations and of invasive procedures increased from 19.3% (4559 of 23 598) and 48.3% (4651 of 9623) to 22.7% (681 of 2995) and 57.5% (689 of 1198), respectively, after adoption of FFDM (P < .001). CONCLUSION After the initial transitional phase from SFM to FFDM, population-based screening with FFDM is associated with less harm because of lower recall and biopsy rates and higher positive predictive values after biopsy than screening with SFM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveig Hofvind
- From the Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, PO Box 5313, 0304 Oslo, Norway (S.H., S.S.); Faculty of Health Science, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway (S.H.); Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway (P.S.); Departments of Medicine (J.G.E.) and Radiology (C.I.L.), School of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health (J.G.E.), University of Washington, Seattle, Wash; and Department of Radiology, Aalesund Hospital, Møre og Romsdal, Norway (S.R.H.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ding H, Ducote JL, Molloi S. Measurement of breast tissue composition with dual energy cone-beam computed tomography: a postmortem study. Med Phys 2014; 40:061902. [PMID: 23718593 DOI: 10.1118/1.4802734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of a three-material compositional measurement of water, lipid, and protein content of breast tissue with dual kVp cone-beam computed tomography (CT) for diagnostic purposes. METHODS Simulations were performed on a flat panel-based computed tomography system with a dual kVp technique in order to guide the selection of experimental acquisition parameters. The expected errors induced by using the proposed calibration materials were also estimated by simulation. Twenty pairs of postmortem breast samples were imaged with a flat-panel based dual kVp cone-beam CT system, followed by image-based material decomposition using calibration data obtained from a three-material phantom consisting of water, vegetable oil, and polyoxymethylene plastic. The tissue samples were then chemically decomposed into their respective water, lipid, and protein contents after imaging to allow direct comparison with data from dual energy decomposition. RESULTS Guided by results from simulation, the beam energies for the dual kVp cone-beam CT system were selected to be 50 and 120 kVp with the mean glandular dose divided equally between each exposure. The simulation also suggested that the use of polyoxymethylene as the calibration material for the measurement of pure protein may introduce an error of -11.0%. However, the tissue decomposition experiments, which employed a calibration phantom made out of water, oil, and polyoxymethylene, exhibited strong correlation with data from the chemical analysis. The average root-mean-square percentage error for water, lipid, and protein contents was 3.58% as compared with chemical analysis. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that the water, lipid, and protein contents can be accurately measured using dual kVp cone-beam CT. The tissue compositional information may improve the sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanjun Ding
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: Observations in 6 million screens. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49:3517-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2013] [Revised: 06/15/2013] [Accepted: 06/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
21
|
Otten J, Fracheboud J, den Heeten G, Otto S, Holland R, de Koning H, Broeders M, Verbeek A. Likelihood of early detection of breast cancer in relation to false-positive risk in life-time mammographic screening: population-based cohort study. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:2501-2506. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
|
22
|
Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA, Prummel MV, Muradali D, Majpruz V, Done SJ, Brown P, Shumak RS, Yaffe MJ. Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Performance Measures in Concurrent Cohorts within an Organized Breast Screening Program. Radiology 2013; 268:684-93. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
23
|
Bosmans H, De Hauwere A, Lemmens K, Zanca F, Thierens H, Van Ongeval C, Van Herck K, Van Steen A, Martens P, Bleyen L, Vande Putte G, Kellen E, Mortier G, Van Limbergen E. Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:2891-8. [PMID: 23689308 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2876-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2012] [Revised: 03/19/2013] [Accepted: 03/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare technical and clinical screening performance parameters between computed radiography (CR) and direct digital radiography (DR) systems. METHODS The number of women screened with CR was 73,008 and with DR 116,945. Technical and patient dose survey data of 25 CR and 37 DR systems were available. Technical performance was expressed by threshold thickness values at the mean glandular dose (MGD) level of routine practice. Clinical indicators included recall rate (RR), cancer detection rate (CDR), percentage of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), percentage of cancers with T-scores smaller than 1 cm and positive predictive value (PPV). RESULTS Contrast threshold values for the 0.1-mm gold disk were 1.44 μm (SD 0.13 μm) for CR and 1.20 μm (SD 0.13 μm for DR). MGD was 2.16 mGy (SD 0.36 mGy) and 1.35 mGy (SD 0.32 mGy) for CR and DR respectively. We obtained for CR, respectively DR, the following results: RR in the first round of 5.48 % versus 5.61 %; RR in subsequent rounds of 2.52 % versus 2.65 %; CDR of 0.52 % versus 0.53 %; DCIS of 0.08 % versus 0.11 %; a rate of cancers with T-scores smaller than 1 cm of 0.11 % versus 0.11 %; PPV of 18.45 % versus 18.64 %; none of them was significantly different. CONCLUSION Our screening indicators are reassuring for the use of CR and DR, with CR operating at 60 % higher MGD. KEY POINTS • Breast cancer screening can employ both computed (CR) and direct digital radiography (DR). • Screening performance parameters for CR and DR technology are not significantly different. • Screening parameters are in accordance with European Guidelines. • Radiation doses employed for CR are generally 60 % greater than for DR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Bosmans
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bluekens AM, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ. Digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a step forward? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2013; 13:505-7. [PMID: 23617341 DOI: 10.1586/era.13.43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
25
|
Blanch J, Sala M, Román M, Ederra M, Salas D, Zubizarreta R, Sanchez M, Rué M, Castells X. Cumulative risk of cancer detection in breast cancer screening by protocol strategy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 138:869-77. [PMID: 23471648 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2458-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2013] [Accepted: 02/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little information on the individual risk of screen-detected cancer in women over successive participations. This study aimed to estimate the 10-year cumulative breast cancer detection risk (ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma) in a population-based breast cancer screening program according to distinct protocol strategies. A further aim was to determine which strategies maximized the cancer detection risk and how this risk was affected by the radiologic protocol variables. METHODS Data were drawn from a retrospective cohort of women from nine population-based screening programs in Spain from 1990 to 2006. We used logistic regression with discrete intervals to estimate the cumulative detection risk at 10 years of follow-up according to radiologic variables and protocol strategies. RESULTS In women starting screening at the age of 45-59 years, the cumulative risk of screen-detected cancer at 10 years ranged from 11.11 to 16.71 per 1,000 participants according to the protocol strategy. The cumulative detection risk for overall cancer and invasive cancer was the highest with strategies using digital mammography, double reading, and two projections (16.71 and 12.07 ‰, respectively). For ductal carcinoma in situ, cumulative detection risk was the highest with strategies using screen-film, double reading, and two projections (2.32 ‰). The risk was the lowest with strategies using screen-film mammography, single reading, and two projections. CONCLUSIONS This study found that at least eleven cancers are detected per 1,000 women screened in the first 10 years of follow-up. Enhanced knowledge of the variability in cumulative risk of screen-detected cancer could improve protocol strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Blanch
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nederend J, Duijm LEM, Louwman MWJ, Groenewoud JH, Donkers-van Rossum AB, Voogd AC. Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:3098-3103. [PMID: 22745215 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) has replaced screen-film mammography (SFM) in most breast screening programs. We analyzed the impact of this replacement on the screening outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population consisted of a consecutive series of 60 770 analog and 63 182 digital screens. During a 1-year follow-up, we collected breast imaging reports, biopsy results and surgical reports of all the referred women. RESULTS The referral rate and the cancer detection rate at FFDM were, respectively, 3.0% and 6,6‰, compared with 1.5% (P < 0.001) and 4.9‰ (P < 0.001) at SFM. Positive predictive values of referral and percutaneous biopsies were lower at FFDM, respectively, 21.9% versus 31.6% (P < 0.001) and 42.9% versus 62.8% (P < 0.001). Per 1000 screened women, there was a significant increase with FFDM versus SFM in the detection rate of low- and intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (+0.7), invasive T1a-c cancers (+0.9), invasive ductal cancers (+0.9), low-grade (+1.1), node-negative invasive cancers (+1.2), estrogen-receptor or progesterone-receptor-positive invasive cancers (respectively, +0.9 and +1.1) and Her2/Neu-negative (+0.8) invasive cancers. Mastectomy rates were stable at 1.1 per 1,000 screens. CONCLUSIONS FFDM significantly increased the referral rate and cancer detection rate, at the expense of a lower positive predictive value of referral and biopsy. Extra tumors detected at FFDM were mostly low-intermediate grade DCIS and smaller invasive tumors, of more favorable tumor characteristics. Mastectomy rates were not increased in the FFDM population, while increased over-diagnosis cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - L E M Duijm
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M W J Louwman
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (IKZ)/Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J H Groenewoud
- Expertise Center Transitions of Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - A C Voogd
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre South (IKZ)/Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Situación de la investigación en el cribado de cáncer de mama en España: implicaciones para la prevención. GACETA SANITARIA 2012; 26:574-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2011] [Revised: 11/15/2011] [Accepted: 11/16/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
28
|
Thierry-Chef I, Simon SL, Weinstock RM, Kwon D, Linet MS. Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present). Radiat Res 2012; 177:92-108. [PMID: 21988547 PMCID: PMC3876279 DOI: 10.1667/rr2241.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The assessment of potential benefits versus harms from mammographic examinations as described in the controversial breast cancer screening recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Task Force included limited consideration of absorbed dose to the fibroglandular tissue of the breast (glandular tissue dose), the tissue at risk for breast cancer. Epidemiological studies on cancer risks associated with diagnostic radiological examinations often lack accurate information on glandular tissue dose, and there is a clear need for better estimates of these doses. Our objective was to develop a quantitative summary of glandular tissue doses from mammography by considering sources of variation over time in key parameters, including imaging protocols, X-ray target materials, voltage, filtration, incident air kerma, compressed breast thickness, and breast composition. We estimated the minimum, maximum and mean values for glandular tissue dose for populations of exposed women within 5-year periods from 1960 to the present, with the minimum to maximum range likely including 90% to 95% of the entirety of the dose range from mammography in North America and Europe. Glandular tissue dose from a single view in mammography is presently about 2 mGy, about one-sixth the dose in the 1960s. The ratio of our estimates of maximum to minimum glandular tissue doses for average-size breasts was about 100 in the 1960s compared to a ratio of about 5 in recent years. Findings from our analysis provide quantitative information on glandular tissue doses from mammographic examinations that can be used in epidemiological studies of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Román R, Sala M, Salas D, Ascunce N, Zubizarreta R, Castells X. Effect of protocol-related variables and women's characteristics on the cumulative false-positive risk in breast cancer screening. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:104-111. [PMID: 21430183 PMCID: PMC3276323 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2010] [Revised: 01/17/2011] [Accepted: 01/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing the false-positive risk in breast cancer screening is important. We examined how the screening-protocol and women's characteristics affect the cumulative false-positive risk. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of 1,565,364 women aged 45-69 years who underwent 4,739,498 screening mammograms from 1990 to 2006. Multilevel discrete hazard models were used to estimate the cumulative false-positive risk over 10 sequential mammograms under different risk scenarios. RESULTS The factors affecting the false-positive risk for any procedure and for invasive procedures were double mammogram reading [odds ratio (OR)=2.06 and 4.44, respectively], two mammographic views (OR=0.77 and 1.56, respectively), digital mammography (OR=0.83 for invasive procedures), premenopausal status (OR=1.31 and 1.22, respectively), use of hormone replacement therapy (OR=1.03 and 0.84, respectively), previous invasive procedures (OR=1.52 and 2.00, respectively), and a familial history of breast cancer (OR=1.18 and 1.21, respectively). The cumulative false-positive risk for women who started screening at age 50-51 was 20.39% [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.02-20.76], ranging from 51.43% to 7.47% in the highest and lowest risk profiles, respectively. The cumulative risk for invasive procedures was 1.76% (95% CI 1.66-1.87), ranging from 12.02% to 1.58%. CONCLUSIONS The cumulative false-positive risk varied widely depending on the factors studied. These findings are relevant to provide women with accurate information and to improve the effectiveness of screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica-Parc de Salut Mar Barcelona; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona
| | - M Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica-Parc de Salut Mar Barcelona; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona
| | - D Salas
- General Directorate of Public Health and Centre for Public Health Research, Valencia
| | - N Ascunce
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona; Navarra Breast Cancer Screening Programme, Public Health Institute, CIBERESP, Pamplona
| | - R Zubizarreta
- Galician Breast Cancer Screening Programme, Public Health and Planning Directorate, Health Office, Santiago de Compostela
| | - X Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Mèdica-Parc de Salut Mar Barcelona; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona; Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD, Taplin SH, Sickles EA. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155:493-502. [PMID: 22007043 PMCID: PMC3726800 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined the comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in U.S. community practice. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the interpretive performance of digital and film-screen mammography differs. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Mammography facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. PARTICIPANTS 329,261 women aged 40 to 79 years underwent 869 286 mammograms (231 034 digital; 638 252 film-screen). MEASUREMENTS Invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed within 12 months of a digital or film-screen examination and calculation of mammography sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rates, and tumor outcomes. RESULTS Overall, cancer detection rates and tumor characteristics were similar for digital and film-screen mammography, but the sensitivity and specificity of each modality varied by age, tumor characteristics, breast density, and menopausal status. Compared with film-screen mammography, the sensitivity of digital mammography was significantly higher for women aged 60 to 69 years (89.9% vs. 83.0%; P = 0.014) and those with estrogen receptor-negative cancer (78.5% vs. 65.8%; P = 0.016); borderline significantly higher for women aged 40 to 49 years (82.4% vs. 75.6%; P = 0.071), those with extremely dense breasts (83.6% vs. 68.1%; P = 0.051), and pre- or perimenopausal women (87.1% vs. 81.7%; P = 0.057); and borderline significantly lower for women aged 50 to 59 years (80.5% vs. 85.1%; P = 0.097). The specificity of digital and film-screen mammography was similar by decade of age, except for women aged 40 to 49 years (88.0% vs. 89.7%; P < 0.001). LIMITATION Statistical power for subgroup analyses was limited. CONCLUSION Overall, cancer detection with digital or film-screen mammography is similar in U.S. women aged 50 to 79 years undergoing screening mammography. Women aged 40 to 49 years are more likely to have extremely dense breasts and estrogen receptor-negative tumors; if they are offered mammography screening, they may choose to undergo digital mammography to optimize cancer detection. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
|
31
|
Detection of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:W761-8. [PMID: 21940549 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.5238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The American College of Radiology recommends that mammogram images be viewed at 100% resolution (also called one-to-one or full resolution). We tested the effect of this and three other levels of zooming on the ability of radiologists to identify malignant calcifications on screening mammographic views. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven breast imagers viewed 77 mammographic images, 32 with and 45 without malignant microcalcifications, using four different degrees of monitor zooming. The readers indicated whether they thought a cluster of potentially malignant calcifications was present and where the cluster was located. Tested degrees of zooming included fit screen, a size midway between fit screen and 100%, 100%, and a size slightly larger than 100%. RESULTS Readers failed to detect 17 clusters of malignant calcifications with fit-screen images, 12 clusters with midway images, 13 clusters with 100% images, and 11 clusters with slightly larger images. When viewing images without malignant microcalcifications, the readers marked false-positive areas on 25 images using fit-screen images, 43 of the midway images, 40 of the 100% images, and 29 of the slightly larger images. CONCLUSION All four tested levels of zooming functioned well. There was a trend for the fit-screen images to function slightly less well than the others with regard to sensitivity, so it may not be prudent to rely on those images without other levels of zooming. The 100% resolution images did not function noticeably better than the others.
Collapse
|
32
|
Houssami N, Ciatto S. The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening. Prev Med 2011; 53:123-6. [PMID: 21605590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2011] [Revised: 04/18/2011] [Accepted: 05/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The potential to avert breast cancer deaths through screening means that efforts continue to identify methods which may enhance early detection. While the role of most new imaging technologies remains in adjunct screening or in the work-up of mammography-detected abnormalities, some of the new breast imaging tests (such as MRI) have roles in screening groups of women defined by increased cancer risk. This paper highlights the evidence and the current role of new breast imaging technologies in screening, focusing on those that have broader application in population screening, including digital mammography, breast ultrasound in women with dense breasts, and computer-aided detection. It highlights that evidence on new imaging in screening comes mostly from non-randomised studies that have quantified test detection capability as adjunct to mammography, or have compared measures of screening performance for new technologies with that of conventional mammography. Two RCTs have provided high-quality evidence on the equivalence of digital and conventional mammography and on outcomes of screen-reading complemented by CAD. Many of these imaging technologies enhance cancer detection but also increase recall and false positives in screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nehmat Houssami
- Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Salas D, Ibáñez J, Román R, Cuevas D, Sala M, Ascunce N, Zubizarreta R, Castells X. Effect of start age of breast cancer screening mammography on the risk of false-positive results. Prev Med 2011; 53:76-81. [PMID: 21575653 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2010] [Revised: 04/19/2011] [Accepted: 04/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the false-positive (FP) risk according to the start age of mammography screening (45-46 or 50-51 years). METHOD Data from eight regions of the Spanish breast cancer screening programme from 1990 to 2006 were included (1,565,364 women). Discrete time-hazard models were used to ascertain the effect of age and time-related, programme-related and personal variables on FP leading to any further procedure and to invasive procedures (FPI). In a subset we estimated the differential FP risk of starting screening at 45-46 years (175,656 women) or 50-51 (251,275). RESULTS A start age of 45-46 versus 50-51 years increased both FP (OR=1.20; 95%CI: 1.13-1.26) and FPI risks (OR=1.43 (95%CI: 1.18-1.73).Other factors increasing FP risk were premenopausal status (FP OR=1.26; 95%CI: 1.23-1.29 and FPI OR=1.22; 95%CI: 1.13-1.31), prior invasive procedures (FP OR=1.52; 95%CI: 1.47-1.57 and FPI (OR=2.08; 95%CI: 1.89-2.28) and family history (FP OR=1.16; 95%CI: 1.12-1.20 and FPI OR=1.26; 95%CI: 1.13-1.41). FP risk was increased by double reading (OR=1.36; 95%CI: 1.23-1.51) and FPI risk by double views (OR=1.34; 95%CI: 1.18-1.52). Both the cumulative FP and FPI risks were higher in women commencing screening at 45-46 years versus 50-51 years (33.30% versus 20.39% and 2.68% versus 1.76%). CONCLUSIONS Starting screening earlier increases the cumulative risk of FP and FPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dolores Salas
- General Directorate Public Health and Centre for Public Health Research (CSISP), Avda. Catalunya 21, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Domingo L, Romero A, Belvis F, Sánchez M, Ferrer J, Salas D, Ibáñez J, Vega A, Ferrer F, Laso MS, Macià F, Castells X, Sala M. Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain. Eur Radiol 2011; 21:2020-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2143-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2011] [Revised: 03/16/2011] [Accepted: 03/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
35
|
Sala M, Salas D, Belvis F, Sánchez M, Ferrer J, Ibañez J, Román R, Ferrer F, Vega A, Laso MS, Castells X. Reduction in False-Positive Results after Introduction of Digital Mammography: Analysis from Four Population-based Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Spain. Radiology 2011; 258:388-95. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
36
|
Iared W, Shigueoka DC, Torloni MR, Velloni FG, Ajzen SA, Atallah AN, Valente O. Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysis. SAO PAULO MED J 2011; 129:250-60. [PMID: 21971901 PMCID: PMC10896020 DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802011000400009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2010] [Accepted: 03/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Mammography is the best method for breast-cancer screening and is capable of reducing mortality rates. Studies that have assessed the clinical impact of mammography have been carried out using film mammography. Digital mammography has been proposed as a substitute for film mammography given the benefits inherent to digital technology. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of digital and film mammography. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched looking for paired studies, cohorts and randomized controlled trials published up to 2009 that compared the performance of digital and film mammography, with regard to cancer detection, recall rates and tumor characteristics. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant citations. RESULTS A total of 11 studies involving 190,322 digital and 638,348 film mammography images were included. The cancer detection rates were significantly higher for digital mammography than for film mammography (risk relative, RR = 1.17; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.06-1.29; I² = 19%). The advantage of digital mammography seemed greatest among patients between 50 and 60 years of age. There were no significant differences between the two methods regarding patient recall rates or the characteristics of the tumors detected. CONCLUSION The cancer detection rates using digital mammography are slightly higher than the rates using film mammography. There are no significant differences in recall rates between film and digital mammography. The characteristics of the tumors are similar in patients undergoing the two methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wagner Iared
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Consequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral rates. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:2067-73. [PMID: 20407901 PMCID: PMC2914257 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1786-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2009] [Revised: 01/07/2010] [Accepted: 02/12/2010] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the referral pattern after the transition to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a population-based breast cancer screening programme. Methods: Preceding the nationwide digitalisation of the Dutch screening programme, an FFDM feasibility study was conducted. Detection and referral rates for FFDM and screen-film mammography (SFM) were compared for first and subsequent screens. Furthermore, radiological characteristics of referrals in digital screening were assessed. Results: A total of 312,414 screening mammograms were performed (43,913 digital and 268,501 conventional), with 4,473 consecutive referrals (966 following FFDM). Initially the FFDM referral rate peaked, and many false-positive results were noted as a consequence of pseudolesions and increased detection of (benign) microcalcifications. A higher overall referral rate was observed in FFDM screening in both first and subsequent examinations (p < .001), with a significant increase in cancer detection (p = .010). Conclusion: As a result of initial inexperience with digital screening images implementing FFDM in a population-based breast cancer screening programme may lead to a strong, but temporary increase in referral. Dedicated training in digital screening for radiographers and screening radiologists is therefore recommended. Referral rates decrease and stabilise (learning curve effect) at a higher level than in conventional screening, yet with significantly enhanced cancer detection.
Collapse
|
38
|
Yamada T. Current status and issues of screening digital mammography in Japan. Breast Cancer 2010; 17:163-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s12282-009-0191-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2009] [Accepted: 11/30/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|