Bedside chest radiography: diagnostic efficacy

Appropriate Endotracheal Tube Position for Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy: A Single-Center Observational Study

Aim This study aimed to investigate the appropriate endotracheal tube (ETT) position during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). Methods This single-center observational study included hospitalized patients who underwent surgical tracheostomy (ST) between August 2021 and October 2022. During ST, the trachea was opened, and the ETT was pulled out visually. It stopped when the ETT was no longer visible, and the tracheostomy tube was placed in the trachea. The ETT position was measured by considering the ETT position during ST to be the appropriate position during PDT. The correlation between the measured ETT position and patient characteristics was evaluated. A prediction equation for the ETT position was derived from the derivation group, and validation of the prediction equation was evaluated by the validation group. Results Forty-six and 15 patients were in the derivation and validation groups, respectively. Weight, duration of intubation, and in-hospital mortality were significantly different between the two groups. The measured ETT position correlated with body height (r=0.60, p<0.001) and sex (r=0.45, p=0.002), while the ETT position before ST showed a weak correlation (r=0.34, p=0.020). The predicted and measured values in the validation group correlated with each other (r=0.58, p=0.024). Conclusion The appropriate ETT position for PDT correlates with body height, and the equation "body height×0.112-0.323 cm" was derived. This predictive equation may be useful as a guide for ETT positioning during PDT puncture.

Time to abandon chest X-rays in favor of intracavitary ECG or echocardiography for central venous access tip location: A case of a malpositioned CICC into the internal mammary vein

Central vascular access devices (CVADs) correct tip location is of paramount importance to avoid malposition related complications. Despite recent guidelines recommend avoiding postprocedure radiograph in favor of alternative tip location technology, chest X-rays are still widely used in clinical practice as a CVADs tip location method. We present a clinical case of a central inserted central catheter (CICC) malposition in the right internal mammary vein, erroneously interpreted by chest X-rays as correctly placed, in a critically ill patient.

Extended Lung Ultrasound to Differentiate Between Pneumonia and Atelectasis in Critically Ill Patients: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of extended lung ultrasonographic assessment, including evaluation of dynamic air bronchograms and color Doppler imaging to differentiate pneumonia and atelectasis in patients with consolidation on chest radiograph. Compare this approach to the Simplified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Lung Ultrasound Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, and the Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency protocol.

DESIGN

Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

SETTING

Adult ICU applying selective digestive decontamination.

PATIENTS

Adult patients that underwent a chest radiograph for any indication at any time during admission. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, coronavirus disease 2019, severe thoracic trauma, and infectious isolation measures were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Lung ultrasound was performed within 24 hours of chest radiograph. Consolidated tissue was assessed for presence of dynamic air bronchograms and with color Doppler imaging for presence of flow. Clinical data were recorded after ultrasonographic assessment. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of dynamic air bronchogram and color Doppler imaging alone and within a decision tree to differentiate pneumonia from atelectasis. Of 120 patients included, 51 (42.5%) were diagnosed with pneumonia. The dynamic air bronchogram had a 45% (95% CI, 31-60%) sensitivity and 99% (95% CI, 92-100%) specificity. Color Doppler imaging had a 90% (95% CI, 79-97%) sensitivity and 68% (95% CI, 56-79%) specificity. The combined decision tree had an 86% (95% CI, 74-94%) sensitivity and an 86% (95% CI, 75-93%) specificity. The Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency protocol had a 100% (95% CI, 93-100%) sensitivity and 0% (95% CI, 0-5%) specificity, while the Simplified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score and Lung Ultrasound Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score had a 41% (95% CI, 28-56%) sensitivity, 84% (95% CI, 73-92%) specificity and 68% (95% CI, 54-81%) sensitivity, 81% (95% CI, 70-90%) specificity, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients with pulmonary consolidation on chest radiograph, an extended lung ultrasound protocol is an accurate and directly bedside available tool to differentiate pneumonia from atelectasis. It outperforms standard lung ultrasound and clinical scores.

Introducing a Radiography-based Score in Children With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Cross-sectional Study

PURPOSE

Respiratory failure (RF) is one of the most common reasons for hospitalization in pediatric intensive care units (PICU). We propose a radiography-based severity score for the assessment of children with RF and investigate the possible associations with severity indices and outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children with acute RF admitted in PICU were enrolled. Disease severity scores [Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD)], the ratio of partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratios, duration of ventilator support (DVS), length of PICU and hospital stay (LOS), and outcome were recorded. A 5-point radiography score that considered potential radiographic findings was derived through stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis, and validated. Radiographs upon PICU admission and on the worst RF day (maximum respiratory support and worst oxygenation/ventilation parameters) were blindly reviewed and independently scored by 2 radiologists and 2 clinicians, following training.

RESULTS

We enrolled 104 children [median age 2.7 (interquartile range, 0.5 to 9.6) y, 65.4% boys]. Overall, 163 radiographs (PICU admission: 86, worst RF day: 77) were assessed. Radiography scores correlated positively with predicted mortality (PELOD, PRISM), DVS, LOS (all P<0.001) and inversely with PaO2/FiO2 (P<0.001). Scores differed among diagnostic categories (P<0.05); patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, air-leaks, drowning, and pneumonia scored the highest (P<0.005). Radiography scoring trends indicating deterioration were associated with prolonged DVS, PICU, and hospital LOS (P<0.001). Agreement between all raters was good (κ=0.7, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel radiography score for children with RF, associated with clinical severity scores, mortality risk, duration of ventilatory support, and hospitalization, follows a simple structured approach and can be readily utilized by radiologists and pediatricians as a bedside tool for stratification of disease severity and prognosis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Intensive Care Unit Patients

Chest radiography is the most frequent and primary imaging modality in the intensive care unit (ICU), given its portability, rapid image acquisition, and availability of immediate information on the bedside preview. Due to the severity of underlying disease and frequent need of placement of monitoring devices, ICU patients are very likely to develop complications related to underlying disease process and interventions. Portable chest radiography in the ICU is an essential tool to monitor the disease process and the complications from interventions; however, it is subject to overuse especially in stable patients. Restricting the use of chest radiographs in the ICU to only when indicated has not been shown to cause harm. The emerging role of bedside point-of-care lung ultrasound performed by the clinicians is noted in the recent literature. The bedside lung ultrasound appears promising but needs cautious evaluation in the future to determine its role in ICU patients. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Imaging Approach to Misplaced Central Venous Catheters

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in patients in a variety of clinical settings, including the intensive care unit, general ward, and outpatient settings. After placement, the radiologist is frequently requested to evaluate the location of CVCs and deem them suitable for use. An understanding of the ideal location of catheter tips as well as the approach to identifying malpositioned catheter tips is essential to prevent improper use, recognize and/or prevent further injury, and direct potential lifesaving care. An approach to CVC placement based on tip location can be helpful in localization and guiding management.

Imaging of Diffuse Lung Disease in the Intensive Care Unit Patient

There is a wide variety of causes of diffuse lung disease in the intensive care unit patient, of which adult respiratory distress syndrome is the commonest clinical consideration. Plain radiography, computed tomography, and ultrasound can be used synergistically to evaluate patients with diffuse lung disease and respiratory impairment. Imaging is not limited to characterization of the cause of diffuse lung disease but also aids in monitoring its evolution and in ventilator setting management.

Bedside lung ultrasonography for diagnosis of pneumonia

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of bedside lung ultrasound (BUS) in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with dyspnoea presenting to the emergency department (ED) and to analyse the characteristic sonographic findings of CAP.

Methods

After a six-hour training program, BUS procedures were performed between October 2011 and February 2012 to prospectively evaluate patients presenting to the ED with dyspnoea. Chest X-ray (CXR) or computerised tomography (CT) were ordered, depending on the presence of consolidation signs on CXR. The outcome was determined by consolidation findings on CXR or CT. BUS results were compared using Chi-squared testing.

Results

Of the 112 enrolled patients with dyspnoea, 40 patients were excluded and 72 were included in the study. Thirty-four patients were BUS positive. Of these, CXR or CT findings agreed with the BUS findings in 27 patients. In 38 cases, BUS was negative, and one patient was diagnosed with pneumonia based on the CT report. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and the positive and negative likelihood ratios for BUS were 96.4%, 84.1%, 79.4%, 97.4%, 6.1 and 0.042, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of BUS was 89%. The presence of consolidation signs, either shred or hepatisation, were the most frequent sonographic findings in our study.

Conclusions

Acute alveolar consolidation can be diagnosed easily by performing BUS with high degree of accuracy in EDs.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Intensive Care Unit Patients

Portable chest radiography is a fundamental and frequently utilized examination in the critically ill patient population. The chest radiograph often represents a timely investigation of new or rapidly evolving clinical findings and an evaluation of proper positioning of support tubes and catheters. Thoughtful consideration of the use of this simple yet valuable resource is crucial as medical cost containment becomes even more mandatory. This review addresses the role of chest radiography in the intensive care unit on the basis of the existing literature and as formed by a consensus of an expert panel on thoracic imaging through the American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Thoracic Imaging in the Intensive Care Unit

Chest radiography is the most common radiological ex amination performed in the United States. Of the more than 260,000 radiological examinations performed an nually at our institution, slightly more than 21% are portable chest radiographs. Routine bedside radio graphs are common in the intensive care unit setting and are a vital component of daily rounds. Critical man agement decisions are often based in whole or in part on radiological findings; it is therefore imperative that in tensive care physicians understand the principles of chest radiography. Thoracic imaging of disease pro cesses most often encountered in the intensive care unit will be reviewed, with emphasis on chest radiographs. Newer imaging modalities, including computed tomog raphy, sonography, and magnetic resonance, will be dis cussed as they pertain to patients in intensive care units.

Effect of Picture Archiving and Communication System Image Manipulation on the Agreement of Chest Radiograph Interpretation in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

Variability in image interpretation has been attributed to differences in the interpreters' knowledge base, experience level, and access to the clinical scenario. Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) has allowed the user to manipulate the images while developing their impression of the radiograph. The aim of this study was to determine the agreement of chest radiograph (CXR) impressions among radiologists and neonatologists and help determine the effect of image manipulation with PACS on report impression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study included 60 patients from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit undergoing CXRs. Three radiologists and three neonatologists reviewed two consecutive frontal CXRs of each patient. Each physician was allowed manipulation of images as needed to provide a decision of "improved," "unchanged," or "disease progression" lung disease for each patient. Each physician repeated the process once more; this time, they were not allowed to individually manipulate the images, but an independent radiologist presets the image brightness and contrast to best optimize the CXR appearance. Percent agreement and opposing reporting views were calculated between all six physicians for each of the two methods (allowing and not allowing image manipulation).

RESULTS

One hundred percent agreement in image impression between all six observers was only seen in 5% of cases when allowing image manipulation; 100% agreement was seen in 13% of the cases when there was no manipulation of the images.

CONCLUSION

Agreement in CXR interpretation is poor; the ability to manipulate the images on PACS results in a decrease in agreement in the interpretation of these studies. New methods to standardize image appearance and allow improved comparison with previous studies should be sought to improve clinician agreement in interpretation consistency and advance patient care.

Novel Method to Improve Radiologist Agreement in Interpretation of Serial Chest Radiographs in the ICU

Objectives:

To determine whether a novel method and device, called a variable attenuation plate (VAP), which equalizes chest radiographic appearance and allows for synchronization of manual image windowing with comparison studies, would improve consistency in interpretation.

Materials and Methods:

Research ethics board approved the prospective cohort pilot study, which included 50 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) undergoing two serial chest radiographs with a VAP placed on each one of them. The VAP allowed for equalization of density and contrast between the patients’ serial chest radiographs. Three radiologists interpreted all the studies with and without the use of VAP. Kappa and percent agreement was used to calculate agreement between radiologists’ interpretations with and without the plate.

Results:

Radiologist agreement was substantially higher with the VAP method, as compared to that with the non-VAP method. Kappa values between Radiologists A and B, A and C, and B and C were 46%, 55%, and 51%, respectively, which improved to 73%, 81%, and 66%, respectively, with the use of VAP. Discrepant report impressions (i.e., one radiologist's impression of unchanged versus one or both of the other radiologists stating improved or worsened in their impression) ranged from 24 to 28.6% without the use of VAP and from 10 to 16% with the use of VAP (χ² = 7.454, P < 0.01). Opposing views (i.e., one radiologist's impression of improved and one of the others stating disease progression or vice versa) were reported in 7 (12%) cases in the non-VAP group and 4 (7%) cases in the VAP group (χ² = 0.85, P = 0.54).

Conclusion:

Numerous factors play a role in image acquisition and image quality, which can contribute to poor consistency and reliability of portable chest radiographic interpretations. Radiologists’ agreement of image interpretation can be improved by use of a novel method consisting of a VAP and associated software and has the potential to improve patient care.

Overview of current lung imaging in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and follow-up of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Chest radiography, bedside lung ultrasonography and computed tomography scans can provide useful information for the management of patients and detection of prognostic factors. However, imaging findings are not specific and several possible differential diagnoses should be taken into account. Herein we will review the role of radiological techniques in ARDS, highlight the plain radiological and computed tomography findings according to the pathological stage of the disease (exudative, inflammatory and fibroproliferative), and summarise the main points for the differential diagnosis with cardiogenic oedema, which is still challenging in the acute stage.

ACR appropriateness criteria routine chest radiographs in intensive care unit patients

Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiographs in the ICU. Having analyzed this practice, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has made the following recommendations: • When monitoring a stable patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a portable chest radiograph is appropriate for clinical indications only. • It is appropriate to obtain a chest radiograph after placement of an endotracheal tube, central venous line, Swan-Ganz catheter, nasogastric tube, feeding tube, or chest tube. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The strongest data contributing to these recommendations were derived from a meta-analysis of 8 trials comprising 7,078 ICU patients by Oba and Zaza [1].

Repositioning endotracheal tubes in the intensive care unit: depth changes poorly correlate with postrepositioning radiographic location

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal positioning of endotracheal tubes (ETs) is often identified on routine chest radiographs prompting adjustment. The accuracy of ET adjustments based on tube measurement markings at the incisors has not been reported.

METHODS

We performed a 1-year prospective observational study of all surgical intensive care unit patients requiring repositioning of their ET based on chest x-ray (CXR) study. The ET was repositioned by a respiratory therapist using tube markings at the incisors, and follow-up CXR images were obtained within 2 hours. ET tube locations were compared with the planned intervention. Mean, median, interquartile range (IQR) and [chi]2 results are reported.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria and had a complete set of data (80% male). ET advancement was the most commonly required intervention (80%). For advancement, the median starting position was 7.10 cm (IQR, 2.20 cm) from the carina, with a median planned advancement of 2.00 cm. The actual advancement was a median of 1.15 cm, achieving 57.5% of the goal. Patients requiring ET withdrawal were more likely female (8 of 11, p < 0.001). For the withdrawal group, the median starting position was 0.70 cm (IQR, 1.05 cm) from the carina with a planned median withdrawal of 2.00 cm (IQR, 0.75 cm). The actual withdrawal was a median of 1.00 cm, achieving 50.0% of the goal. Overall, the mean difference between the planned and actual intervention was 1.55 cm (95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.95 cm) differing by a mean of 40% from the planned intervention (95% confidence interval, 29.0-51.0%). There was no correlation between the original location or the planned intervention and the accuracy of the intervention. In three cases, the ET moved opposite of the planned intervention.

CONCLUSION

ET repositioning based on measurement at the incisors is inaccurate and the magnitude of the intervention does not correlate with the degree of error. Repositioning of ETs based on measurements at the incisors should be abandoned, or follow-up CXR images should be obtained.

Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Chest x-rays (CXRs) are the most frequent radiological tests performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the utility of performing daily routine CXRs is unclear.

Methods

We searched Medline and Embase (1948 to March 2011) for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and before-after observational studies comparing a strategy of routine CXRs to a more restrictive approach with CXRs performed to investigate clinical changes among critically ill adults or children. In duplicate, we extracted data on the CXR strategy, study quality and clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stay).

Results

Nine studies (39,358 CXRs; 9,611 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Three trials (N = 870) of moderate to good quality provided information on the safety of a restrictive routine CXR strategy; only one trial systematically assessed for missed findings. Pooled data from trials showed no evidence of effect of a restrictive approach on ICU mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.72; two trials, N = 776), hospital mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.41, P = 0.91; two trials, N = 259), ICU length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.86 days, 95% CI -2.38 to 0.66 days, P = 0.27; three trials, N = 870), hospital length of stay (WMD -2.50 days, 95% CI -6.62 to 1.61 days, P = 0.23; two trials, N = 259), or duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD -0.30 days, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.89 days, P = 0.62; three trials, N = 705). Adding data from six observational studies, one of which systematically screened for missed findings, gave similar results.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis did not detect any harm associated with a restrictive chest radiograph strategy. However, confidence intervals were wide and harm was not rigorously assessed. Therefore, the safety of abandoning routine CXRs in patients admitted to the ICU remains uncertain.

[Thoracic radiology in the intensive care unit]

The clinical evaluation of the intensive care unit patient is based upon multiple parameters, including portable chest x-ray examination. Knowledge of the methods, capabilities, and limitations is prerequisite for a legally correct and medically reasonable approach. This report provides basic knowledge about pleural und pulmonary pathologies, e.g., pneumothorax, pleural effusion, atelectasis, aspiration, pneumonia, lung edema, and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Real-time lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of alveolar consolidation and interstitial syndrome in the emergency department

During the last few years, a growing number of studies have shown the accuracy of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases. The latest developments in lung ultrasound are not because of technological advance, but are based on new applications and discovering the meanings of sonographic artifacts. Real-time sonography of the lung in the emergency department saves time and cost, providing immediate information to the clinician, relying on very easy-to-acquire data. The bedside sonographic recognition of pulmonary diseases practically guides management and reduces the amount of negative radiologic image testings. This review describes some innovative practical applications of B-mode lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of alveolar consolidations and interstitial syndrome in the emergency department.

The use of bedside chest radiography at a university hospital. Data on a two-week period

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the requests for bedside chest radiography (BCR) by clinicians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After IRB approval, we retrieved the patients' clinical records for demographics, unit, and duration for recovery in a two weeks period. For each BCR, exposure data and the reason for BCR were registered. The BCR results were categorized as one or more of the followings: negative, regular/irregular device position, known finding(s) unmodified/modified in respect with the previous BCR, new expected finding(s) (pleural effusion, low ventilation), or new unexpected findings (pulmonary edema, pneumothorax). As a utility indicator of BCR, we considered the rate of chest CT performed in these patients during the study period and the following week. We have estimated the effective radiation dose.

RESULTS

A total of 337 BCRs (126 patients) entered the analysis, 74% of them being performed in post-surgery intensive care unit. Seventy-3 patients (58%) performed 1 or 2 BCRs, 53 (42%) 3 or more BCRs with a maximum of 13 BCRs performed on a newborn. The mean total effective dose was 0.2 mSv/patient (maximum 1 mSv). In post-surgery intensive care unit the mean daily BCR rate was 0.8/day (maximum 2/day). On 337 BCR requests, 49% showed no motivations at all, 42% reported the word "check" and in 9% a well-defined clinical query was specified. The rate of incorrect catheter position and new unexpected findings was 4%. One chest CT have been requested.

CONCLUSION

BCR is often requested as a routine examination with a little rate of unexpected findings.

Bildgebende Verfahren: Röntgen, Ultraschall, CT, Nuklearmedizin

In der Intensivmedizin findet die radiologische Diagnostik überwiegend am Krankenbett statt (»bedside radiology«). Etwa 90 % der radiologischen Untersuchungen in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin stellen projektionsradiographische Röntgenaufnahmen des Thorax, des Abdomens und des Skelettsystems dar. In zunehmendem Maße werden neben den klassischen Aufnahmen auch die Schnittbildverfahren eingesetzt. Hier kommt der Ultraschalldiagnostik eine führende Rolle zu, gefolgt von der Computertomographie (CT).

Thoracic imaging in the ICU

Imaging in the ICU plays a crucial role in patient care. The portable chest radiograph (CXR) is the most commonly requested radiographic examination, and, despite its limitations, it often reveals abnormalities that may not be detected clinically. Recent advances in CT technology have made it possible to obtain diagnostic-quality images even in the most dyspneic patient. This article reviews the significant contribution thoracic imaging makes in diagnosing and managing critically ill patients.

Chest radiography practice in critically ill patients: a postal survey in the Netherlands

Background

To ascertain current chest radiography practice in intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands.

Methods

Postal survey: a questionnaire was sent to all ICUs with > 5 beds suitable for mechanical ventilation; pediatric ICUs were excluded. When an ICU performed daily-routine chest radiographs in any group of patients it was considered to be a "daily-routine chest radiography" ICU.

Results

From the number of ICUs responding, 63% practice a daily-routine strategy, in which chest radiographs are obtained on a daily basis without any specific reason. A daily-routine chest radiography strategy is practiced less frequently in university-affiliated ICUs (50%) as compared to other ICUs (68%), as well as in larger ICUs (> 20 beds, 50%) as compared to smaller ICUs (< 20 beds, 65%) (P > 0.05). Remarkably, physicians that practice a daily-routine strategy consider daily-routine radiographs helpful in guiding daily practice in less than 30% of all performed radiographs. Chest radiographs are considered essential for verification of the position of invasive devices (81%) and for diagnosing pneumothorax, pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (82%, 74% and 69%, respectively). On demand chest radiographs are obtained after introduction of thoracic drains, central venous lines and endotracheal tubes in 98%, 84% and 75% of responding ICUs, respectively. Chest films are also obtained in case of ventilatory deterioration (49% of responding ICUs), and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (59%), tracheotomy (58%) and mini-tracheotomy (23%).

Conclusion

There is notable lack of consensus on chest radiography practice in the Netherlands. This survey suggests that a large number of intensivists may doubt the value of daily-routine chest radiography, but still practice a daily-routine strategy.

Introduction of grids to mobile ICU radiography in a teaching hospital

The purpose of this study was to review the change in image quality before and after introducing grid use routinely to our mobile X-ray service. This was studied in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, comparing images obtained over a 2 week period prior to and after the introduction of the change in technique. We introduced a 6:1 grid with appropriate changes in exposure factors. No other alterations were made. There were 133 patients in the preliminary group and 196 patients in the post-grid group. We found a reduction in the proportion of images that were of non-diagnostic or barely diagnostic quality. Non-diagnostic examinations were reduced from 18% to 1%. Introducing grids to our mobile service resulted in improvement in image diagnostic quality, largely by reducing the proportion of poor and unacceptable quality images. This effect does not appear to have been documented in the literature.

Can we abandon daily routine chest radiography in intensive care patients?

Two different schools of thought exist on the utility of daily routine chest radiographs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients: some ICU physicians argue that daily routine chest radiographs are indicated in all patients who have cardiopulmonary problems or are receiving artificial ventilation. Others state that chest radiographs should be made on indication only, for example, following a change in clinical status or change of supportive devices. Most studies on this topic have simply reported the existence of several findings on chest radiographs; some investigators tried to determine whether such findings were new and/or unexpected and whether they caused a therapy change. A restrictive strategy has been compared with a daily routine strategy in only 2 clinical trials: 1 study conducted in a pediatric ICU (pediatric ICUs usually have low mortality rates), and the other a rather small (and probably underpowered) study. The debate about discontinuing daily routine chest radiographs in the ICU is still not settled.

Radiology in the intensive care unit (Part I)

The increasing complexity of the intensive care patient combined with the recent advances in imaging technology has generated a new perspective on intensive care radiology. The purpose of this 2-part review article is to describe the contribution of radiology to the management of these critically ill patients. The first article will discuss the impact of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on critical care management and utility of the portable chest radiograph in the detection and evaluation of pulmonary disease with correlation to computed tomography (CT). The second article describes in more detail the increasing role of CT in diagnosis and therapeutic procedures. In particular, the implementation of CT pulmonary angiography in the evaluation of pulmonary emboli and the introduction of the new multislice detector CT scanners that allow even the most dyspneic patient to be evaluated. Pleural complications in the intensive care unit and image-guided intervention will also be discussed.

Ultrasound diagnosis of alveolar consolidation in the critically ill

OBJECTIVE

Alveolar consolidation is a basic concern in critically ill patients. Radiography is not a precise tool, and referral to CT raises problems (transport, irradiation). The aim of this study was to assess the utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of alveolar consolidation.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

The medical ICU of a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 65 cases of alveolar consolidation proven on CT were compared to 53 CT controls.

MEASUREMENTS

Alveolar consolidation was defined as a tissue-like pattern visible at the chest wall, arising from the pleural line and devoid of centrifugal inspiratory dynamics.

RESULTS

Feasibility was 99%. In 65 cases of alveolar consolidation, ultrasound was positive in 59 and negative in 6. In 52 analyzable controls, ultrasound was negative in 51 and positive in 1. Sensitivity of ultrasound was 90% and specificity 98%. A concordance test showed a Kappa coefficient of 0.89. Among 62 posterior locations on CT, ultrasound showed posterior consolidation patterns in 56 cases and was negative in 6. Ultrasound showed anterior involvement in all 3 cases of whole lung consolidation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound provides a reliable non-invasive, bedside method for accurate detection and location of alveolar consolidation in critically ill patients.

Utility of daily routine portable chest radiographs in mechanically ventilated patients in the medical ICU

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there is any difference in diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome efficacy between protocols utilizing daily (ie, routine) chest radiographs (CXRs) and those utilizing clinically indicated (ie, nonroutine) CXRs in mechanically ventilated patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, observational study.

SETTING

A 20-bed medical ICU at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Adult patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for > 48 h.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Ninety-four patients who had been intubated for at least 48 h were randomized to receive either routine or nonroutine CXRs and were observed until extubation or death. The percentage of CXRs with new findings was significantly larger in the nonroutine CXR group (53.1%; 120 CXRs) compared to that in the routine CXR group (33.4%; 98 CXRs; odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 2.18; p = 0.004). The number of CXRs with new findings that resulted in interventions was significantly larger in the nonroutine CXR group (26.5%; 60 CXRs) compared to that in the routine CXR group (13.3%; 39 CXRs; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.08; p = 0.002). There was no difference in the mean duration of mechanical ventilation (routine CXR arm, 7.93 days; nonroutine CXR arm, 6.76 days; p = 0.2606), length of ICU stay (routine CXR arm, 11.93 days; nonroutine CXR arm, 9.55 days; p = 0.1936), and total length of hospital stay (routine CXR arm, 19.34 days; nonroutine CXR arm, 16.45 days; p = 0.2199) between the two groups. Although patients in the nonroutine arm of the study received fewer CXRs, adverse outcomes (eg, length of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and mortality) did not increase (p = 0.818). Using the number of CXRs per patient as a surrogate, there was a statistically significant cost savings and decreased radiation exposure in the nonroutine CXR group.

CONCLUSIONS

For mechanically ventilated patients, a strategy calling for daily routine CXRs compared to CXRs obtained based on clinical indications alone was not associated with reduced ICU or hospital length of stay or with reduced mortality.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: imaging of the injured lung

In patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), there is non-specific but widespread exudation of oedema and inflammatory fluid into the lungs. The clinical corollary (dyspnoea, refractory hypoxia, reduced pulmonary compliance and diffuse pulmonary infiltrates) is catastrophic and generally associated with a poor outcome. Imaging is integral to the care of these critically ill patients on the intensive care unit. In the present review, the radiological changes on plain radiography and computed tomography (CT) in patients with ARDS are discussed. Particular attention is directed at the appearances on CT: the relationships between CT features, histopathological changes and the inevitable alterations in pulmonary physiology are explored.

Efficacy of daily bedside chest radiography as visualized by digital luminescence radiography

To determine the diagnostic impact of daily bedside chest radiography in comparison with digital luminescence technique (DLR; storage phosphor radiography) and conventional film screen radiography, a prospective randomized study was completed in 210 mechanically ventilated patients with a total of 420 analysed radiographs. The patients were allocated to two groups: 150 patients underwent DLR, and 60 patients underwent conventional film screen radiography. Radiological analysis was performed consensually and therapeutic efficacy was assessed by the clinicians. There was no statistical significant difference between the frequency of abnormal findings seen on DLR and conventional film screen radiography. In total, 448 abnormal findings were present in 249 of 300 DLR and 97 of 120 conventional film screen radiographs. The most common findings were signs of overhydration (41%), pleural effusion (31%), partial collapse of the lung (11%) and pneumothorax (2%). One hundred and twenty-three of 448 (27%) of these abnormal findings were thought to have a considerable impact on patient management. The high rate of abnormal findings with significant impact on patient management suggests that the use of daily bedside chest radiography may be reasonable.

Routine chest radiographs in pediatric intensive care units

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether interventions were performed based on portable routine morning chest x-rays (CXRs) in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients and to identify patient subgroups for whom the routine CXR is most useful.

DESIGN

Prospective multiinstitutional study. Setting. PICUs of 15 tertiary care hospitals. Patients. PICU patients who received a routine morning CXR were included in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Recorded data included: weight, diagnosis, presence of active cardiopulmonary problems, length of stay, and number and type of devices. The number and types of interventions based on the interpretation of the CXR were recorded.

RESULTS

Five hundred twelve routine CXRs were evaluated. The majority of the routine chest radiographs were obtained on patients who were admitted for cardiovascular disease (195/512; 38%) or respiratory failure (186/512; 36%), and 465/512 of the routine CXRs (91%) were performed on patients with one or more devices. Two hundred thirty-one of the 512 routine CXRs (45%) resulted in 1 or more interventions. One hundred fifty-five of the 284 routine CXRs (55%) obtained in children </=10 kg resulted in one or more interventions, compared with 61/152 (40%) and 15/76 (20%) of routine CXRs obtained in children 10 to 40 kg and >/=40 kg, respectively. The frequency of interventions increased from 19% in children with no devices to >50% in children with 2 or more devices. One or more interventions were performed in 27% of routine CXRs when no active cardiopulmonary problems were present, compared with 51% of routine CXRs when active cardiopulmonary problems were present. Diagnosis and length of intensive care unit stay at the time the routine CXR was obtained did not affect the percentage of CXRs that resulted in interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine CXRs are more likely to result in interventions in the smaller, critically ill child with one or more devices and if active cardiopulmonary problems are present.

Chest radiographs after dilatational percutaneous tracheotomy: are they necessary?

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of routinely obtaining chest radiographs after standard open tracheotomy has been questioned. Recent literature would suggest that after a routine, uncomplicated tracheotomy, chest radiography is a low-yield procedure that incurs unnecessary expense. Percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT) is rapidly replacing open tracheotomy as the intensive care unit procedure of choice for airway management. Complication rates are equivalent between the two procedures.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the value and cost-effectiveness of routine postoperative chest radiographs in patients undergoing PDT.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The study was a prospective analysis of 54 consecutive PDTs performed at a tertiary care academic institution.

RESULTS

Eighteen (33%) patients had chest radiographs obtained within 1 hour of PDT (6 at the request of the otolaryngology service); 35 (66%) underwent radiography more than 2 hours later at the request of the intensive care unit for reasons other than PDT. There were no incidents of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or tracheotomy tube malposition in any patient. Patients undergoing chest radiography within 1 hour of the PDT also had chest radiographs within 12 hours at the request of ICU staff for their underlying disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine chest radiography after PDT is of low yield. Because most of these patients require chest radiographs for their underlying disease within 12 hours, a cost savings of approximately $13,500 would be realized in this patient population.

SIGNIFICANCE

Routine chest radiography after PDT is unwarranted in most cases.

Efficacy of chest CT in a pediatric ICU: a prospective study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine whether chest CT provides additional information compared with chest radiography regarding the nature of intrathoracic disease in critically ill children, (2) to determine whether such information alters clinical management, (3) to assess the role of a low-dose high-resolution CT (HRCT) protocol in pediatric ICU (PICU) patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Specialized PICU in a teaching hospital serving London and the south of England.

PATIENTS

Twenty children (age range, 3 weeks to 12 years; median, 11 months) underwent chest CT during a 33-month period. Inclusion criteria were (1) inconclusive diagnosis from chest radiograph (CXR) or (2) CXR appearances inconsistent with high oxygenation or ventilatory requirements (PaO(2) to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio < 30 or mean airway pressure > 15 cm H(2)O).

INTERVENTIONS

Low-dose HRCT scans (50 mA, 2-mm slice thickness at intervals of 10 or 15 mm) were performed on 12 patients, and helical CT (50 to 250 mA; pitch, 1 to 1.5) performed on 8 patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

CT provided additional information regarding the nature of intrathoracic disease in 17 of 20 patients (85%) and resulted in changes to subsequent clinical management in 12 of 20 patients (60%).

CONCLUSIONS

Chest CT can add to the accuracy of intrathoracic diagnosis provided by the CXR and may directly influence the acute management of critically ill children. The CT protocol should be tailored to the clinical and radiologic question posed for each individual patient. Noncontiguous HRCT can often provide accurate assessment of pulmonary parenchymal and pleural disease at a reduced radiation dose compared with helical CT.

Ultrasound and other imaging technologies in the intensive care unit

As technology advances, more imaging and procedures are performed at the bedside on critically ill patients in ICUs, thereby eliminating the risks of transporting patients. These imaging techniques can serve as diagnostic and therapeutic tools in treating the acute and chronic consequences of injured, critically ill patients. One area of growth is ultrasonography. Critical care applications of ultrasonography are expanding, and the learning curve of surgeons and intensivists performing some of these studies is improving. Ultrasonography can supplement physical examination and provide useful "real-time" information on nearly every body cavity. Other imaging technology is also available in a portable form, enabling imaging directly at the bedside. Images are now becoming readily and easily available with the advancement of teleradiology. Some of the imaging modalities are still in development, and their clinical effectiveness is being studied. In the future, more uses of these various imaging technologies may become evident and cost-effective.

Bedside chest radiography as part of a postcardiac surgery critical care pathway: a means of decreasing utilization without adverse clinical impact

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of bedside chest radiography and patient outcome before and after implementation of a cardiac surgery critical care pathway that included guidelines for bedside radiography.

DESIGN

A cohort observational study.

SETTING

A university hospital in the midwest.

PATIENTS

Three groups, of 100 patients each, undergoing cardiac surgery in 1990, 1991, and 1995.

INTERVENTION

Introduction of a critical care pathway.

MEASUREMENTS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in three groups of 100 patients each: before the introduction of the critical care pathway; 2 months after introduction of the pathway in 1991; and 4 yrs after introduction in 1995. Data were analyzed to determine operative risk for each group. Subsequent analyses determined bedside radiography use, total length of hospital stay, and patient outcome (mortality rate, complications requiring intervention, and reoperation) during hospitalization and at outpatient follow-up 15-30 days postdischarge.

RESULTS

Total length of hospital stay was shorter for the 1995 group (7.6+/-6.6 days) compared with other groups (prepathway, 11.1+/-10.3 days; 1991 postpathway, 10.2+/-9.6 days; p<.05). The mean numbers of radiographs per patient were as follows: prepathway, 5.1; 1991 postpathway, 5.2; and 1995 postpathway, 3.3. The mean number of radiographs in the 1995 group was significantly lower (p = .02). More patients had the proposed number of two bedside radiographs described in the pathway in the 1995 group compared with the other groups (prepathway, p<.0001; the two-month postpathway group, p = .01). Twenty-three malpositioned catheters/tubes were found in the prepathway and 1991 groups compared with 11 in the 1995 group (p = .02). No statistically significant difference was found in inpatient complications (mediastinal bleeding, pneumothoraces, and pleural effusions), postdischarge complications, reoperations, or mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a critical care pathway can decrease the use of bedside radiography without adversely affecting near-term patient outcomes.

Postoperative portable chest radiographs: optimum use in thoracic surgery

PURPOSE

Daily portable chest radiographs are routinely ordered in many institutions after thoracic surgery. Our purpose was to assess the efficacy and cost of this practice and to determine the optimum use of postoperative x-ray studies.

METHODS

A prospective review of all portable chest x-ray films after 100 consecutive elective thoracotomies (DRG 75) was conducted. Each x-ray study initiated a three-part survey. First, the surgeon listed whether the x-ray study was routine and the anticipated management had it not been available. The radiologist then interpreted and scored the x-ray study as follows: negative, expected findings; A, minor findings necessitating no intervention; B, minor findings necessitating intervention; or C, major findings necessitating intervention. Finally, the x-ray film and the interpretation were returned to the surgeon. Any interventions necessitated by the x-ray study were recorded.

RESULTS

In 6 months, 99 patients underwent 82 pulmonary resections and 18 other major procedures. In the postoperative period, 769 portable chest x-ray studies were ordered, median five per patient (range 2 to 49). Of these, 731 (95%) were routine and 38 (5%), nonroutine. Severity scores were as follows: negative in 106 (13.8%), A in 558 (72.5%), B in 59 (7.7%), and C in 46 (6.0%). X-ray findings altered management in 43 of 769 studies (5.6%): in 33 routine (4.5%), in 10 nonroutine (26.3%), in 13 A (2.3%), in 22 B (37.3%), and in 8 C (17.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that routine daily portable chest x-ray studies have a minimal impact on management. It is, in fact, nonroutine x-ray studies that more often alter management. Had routine portable chest x-ray studies, which cost $114 each in our institution, been limited to one immediately after the operation, only 133 such studies (100 routine and 33 nonroutine) would have been needed in the care of these patients. Elimination of 636 (82.7%) x-ray studies reduces the cost of care by $725 per patient ($286,000 annually). For major thoracic procedures, it is safe, efficacious, and cost effective to eliminate routine postoperative portable chest x-ray studies and order nonroutine portable studies only when clinically indicated.

Routine portable chest radiographs in the medical intensive care unit: effects and costs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects and net costs of routine chest radiographs in a medical intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN

A prospective, cohort study. A survey of experts in critical care and pulmonary diseases was undertaken to assess the effect of routine radiographs on patient management.

SETTING

Medical ICU of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Eighty randomly selected patients admitted to a medical ICU. Two hundred fourteen experts were surveyed; 118 (55%)/214 responded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Daily interviews with medical ICU clinicians were conducted to assess the radiographic findings in the routine radiographs and actions taken based on these findings. Experts evaluated the findings, their importance, the actions taken, and the probability of complications if the actions had not been taken at that time. Experts also predicted increases in length of stay associated with these complications. Presence of radiographic findings, changes in management because of the findings, net costs of routine chest radiographs, cost per finding that prompted an action, and expected changes in length of stay resulting from the actions were also assessed. Seventy-two (33%) of 221 routine radiographs (95% confidence interval: 25% to 39%) had findings, of which 44 (61%) were judged important, and 18 (8%, 95% confidence interval: 5% to 12%) prompted actions. Experts predicted that each action averted, on average, 2.1 +/- 1.7 days (SD) in the medical ICU. Mean savings per routine radiograph was $98. Net savings from routine chest radiographs remained after sensitivity analysis for expected change in length of stay, percentage of patients with routine radiographs, and percentage of routine radiographs that produce changes in management.

CONCLUSION

The policy of obtaining routine chest radiographs in the medical ICU is effective and results in net savings.

Chest radiography in the ICU

Proper positioning and assessment of abnormalities and complications of the above-mentioned devices have a significant impact on the management of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The timely assessment of new or rapidly evolving findings is critical. Optimal radiographic technique, availability of images to the clinicians, and rapid reporting by the radiologist all serve to maximize the efficacy of bedside chest radiography in the ICU. Sometimes, changes in cardiopulmonary status may only be appreciated on chest radiographs (CXRs). Complications from ventilatory assistance, such as barotrauma, occur frequently and must be detected promptly. The position of monitoring devices, an important component of critical care management, is best checked radiographically. Indications for CXRs and the recommended frequency for repeat follow-up CXRs are based on the existing literature and the consensus of an expert panel formed by the American College of Radiology.

Utility of routine admission chest radiographs in patients with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage admitted to an intensive care unit

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic yield of routine admission chest radiographs in patients with acute gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage and clinical predictors of radiographic abnormalities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective series of 202 adult patients with GI hemorrhage admitted to intensive care units at an academic medical center. Routine admission chest radiographs were obtained in 161 patients. These radiographs were reviewed by a study radiologist blinded to the study purpose. The radiologist scored radiographic abnormalities into categories of "minor" or "major," "new" or "previously known," and "with an intervention" or "without an intervention." Nominal logistic regression explored the data for clinical features that identified patients with major new radiographic abnormalities with or without an intervention.

RESULTS

Minor radiographic abnormalities were noted in 23 (14.3%) patients, of whom 17 (10.6%) patients had "new" (previously unknown) abnormalities. No minor abnormality prompted a therapeutic or diagnostic intervention. Major radiographic abnormalities were detected in 21 (13.0%) patients, of whom 19 (11.8%) had new findings. Major new findings prompted interventions in only 9 (5.6%) of patients. A history of lung disease and an abnormal lung physical examination predicted major new radiographic findings (P = 0.0001, sensitivity 79%, negative predictive value 96%). These variables also identified major new abnormalities that prompted interventions (P = 0.007, sensitivity 89%, negative predictive value 99%). Use of the logistic regression model to select patients for admission chest radiographs decreased charges from $1,068 to $580 for each detected major new radiographic abnormality and from $2,254 to $1,087 for major new radiographic abnormalities that prompted an intervention.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that routine chest radiographs have a low yield in detecting major new radiographic abnormalities in patients with acute GI hemorrhage. Clinical criteria, available at the time of admission, may be useful for selecting patients for chest radiographic evaluations.

Endotracheal tube location verified reliably by cuff palpation

To verify a safe location of the endotracheal tube (ETT), palpation of the ETT at the sternal notch is a time-honored technique: After anesthetic induction and confirmation of orotracheal intubation, the patient's head is placed in a neutral position. The ETT is withdrawn or advanced while gentle, repetitive pressure is applied with the fingers at the level of the suprasternal notch. Simultaneously, the pilot balloon is held in the other hand. When the balloon distends from the pressure applied at the notch, the ETT is secured. We tested the efficacy of this technique in men and women who underwent general anesthesia. After the ETT was secured, the distance (in cm) from its tip to the upper incisors, that is, the length of ETT inserted, was measured to confirm its location relative to the carina. The study population consisted of 44 women and 38 men (n = 82) who ranged in age from 16 to 85 yr and in ASA physical status from I to IV. The size of the ETT tube for women ranged from 7.0 to 8.0 and for men, 7.0 to 8.5. Average distance from the tip of the ETT to teeth in women was 20.2 cm (range, 17-23) and in men 21.9 cm (range, 19-25). Average distance to the carina in women was 3 cm (range, 2-5) and in men 3.4 cm (range, 2-6). In this study, palpation of the ETT cuff effectively confirmed ETT location. The technique, which should not be used to verify endotracheal rather than bronchial intubation, should decrease the risk of bronchial intubation or impingement on the carina.

Routine chest radiographs following repositioning of endotracheal tubes are necessary to assess correct position in pediatric patients

Attempts to correctly reposition endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are not always successful in pediatric patients, even when chest radiographs (CXRs) are measured to determine the distance that the ETT deviates from the correct position. We determined the frequency of continued ETT malposition after repositioning in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Forty children with malpositioned ETTs were identified during a 4-month period. After repositioning, ten (25 percent) continued to be malpositioned on the next CXR. Of 47 children with correctly positioned ETTs, only one ETT (2 percent) was found to be incorrectly positioned on the next routine CXR obtained 24 h later. The difference in frequency of ETT malposition between these two groups of children is significant (p < 0.0001). The children were similar in weight and age. Despite repositioning based on measurements taken from a CXR, a large percentage of pediatric patients had continued ETT malposition. However, after radiographic documentation of correct position, we demonstrated that significant movement was uncommon. Routine confirmation of ETT position by CXRs should be considered after repositioning ETTs in pediatric patients.