Intraarticular facet block: diagnostic test or therapeutic procedure?

Therapeutic Facet Joint Interventions in the Lumbar Spine: An Economic Value Perspective

OBJECTIVE

In this narrative review, the current literature on therapeutic interventions for low back pain of facet joint etiology is assessed from an economic value perspective.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The efficacy and economics of facet joint interventions in the treatment of lumbar back pain is a controversial topic. Trends show that facet joint interventions are becoming increasingly used, perhaps as physicians become more averse to treating chronic low back pain with opioids. With the emphasis on value-based spine care and changing reimbursement models, the perspective of rigorously evaluating the outcomes these interventions provide and the costs they incur is particularly relevant.

DISCUSSION

Although the evidence is noted to be limited, most systematic reviews fail to demonstrate the therapeutic utility of intra-articular facet joint injections in low back pain because of high study heterogeneity. A few good quality studies and systematic reviews describe moderate evidence for the utilization of therapeutic medial branch blocks and radiofrequency neurotomies in alleviating facet joint pain.

CONCLUSION

Consequently, there is a need for high-quality cost-effectiveness studies for facet joint interventions so that evidence-based and economically viable solutions can be used to optimize patient care at a societally affordable price.

The effect of facet joint injection on lumbar spinal stenosis with radiculopathy

Objectives:

Facet Joint Injection (FJI) is known to be effective in axial back pain, but the purpose of this study was to assess the effects of FJI on patients treated with it among those with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS).

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective database analysis and investigated electronic medical records of 125 LSS patients treated with FJI in the pain clinic of Chungbuk National University Hospital from November 2, 2016 to July 31, 2017. Sex, age, histories of low back surgery, complaining of neurogenic claudication, symptomatic sites of patients, FJI sites, number of sites of FJI, triamcinolone dosage, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) before and after treatment, facet joint capsule rupture during treatment, and improvement of neurogenic claudication after treatment, were examined.

Results:

Among 125 patients, we investigated 91 patients who met the criteria. There was significant difference in NRS before and after treatment (p<0.000). Forty one patients with reduction of NRS more than 30% after FJI were allocated to effect group. FJI was more effective in patients who did not have the surgery (p=0.044), as well as those who showed an improved neurogenic claudication after treatment (p=0.001). Other measured values did not show statistical significances.

Conclusions:

FJI has relatively a lower risk and is simpler in terms of techniques than other interventional treatments performed within the spinal canal. Therefore, FJI may be another interventional treatment option in patients with pain by LSS. In the future, studies for FJI indication in LSS patients should be additionally required.

Spine osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis of the spine develops as a consequence of the natural aging process and is associated with significant morbidity and health care expenditures. Effective diagnosis and treatment of the resultant pathologic conditions can be clinically challenging. Recent evidence has emerged to aid the investigating clinician in formulating an accurate diagnosis and in implementing a successful treatment algorithm. This article details the degenerative cascade that results in the osteoarthritic spine, reviews prevalence data for common painful spinal disorders, and discusses evidence-based treatment options for management of zygapophysial and sacroiliac joint arthrosis.

Acute Treatment of Facet Syndrome by CT-Guided Injection of Dexamethasone-21-Palmitate Alone and in Combination with Mepivacaine

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of dexamethasone-21-palmitate and mepivacaine alone and in combination in the acute treatment of facet syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 157 patients requiring acute therapy for lumbar facet syndrome were treated with computed tomography (CT)-guided intra-articular infiltration of either an anti-inflammatory corticosteroid, a local anaesthetic or a combination of the two. Patients assigned to the first treatment group (n = 60) received the corticosteroid dexamethasone-21-palmitate (Lipotalon((R))); patients in the second group (n = 36) received the local anaesthetic mepivacaine (Meaverin((R))); patients in the third group (n = 61) received a combination of the two drugs. The study duration was from November 2002 until June 2003.

RESULTS

In all three groups, values for compression pain, stress pain and rest pain improved significantly from baseline within 1 hour of injection: in the dexamethasone monotherapy group there was a 13% reduction in compression pain, 20% reduction in stress, and 22% reduction in rest pain; in the groups that received mepivacaine only or a combination of the two drugs there was a 63% and 60%, respectively, reduction of compression pain, 81% and 83%, respectively, reduction of stress pain, and 84% and 77%, respectively, reduction of rest pain. After 72 hours, improvements in these variables were significantly greater in patients treated with dexamethasone-21-palmitate (either as monotherapy or in combination therapy) than in patients treated with mepivacaine alone. In both groups treated with dexamethasone palmitate there was a 57% and 64%, respectively, reduction of compression pain, 70% and 66%, respectively, reduction of stress pain, and 75% and 64%, respectively, reduction of rest pain. In the mepivacaine monotherapy group there was a 17% reduction in compression pain, 26% reduction in stress pain and 13% reduction in rest pain. Both physicians and patients also rated the dexamethasone-21-palmitate-containing regimens as more effective than mepivacaine alone at 72 hours. Over the entire observation period, combination therapy was, on average, superior to both monotherapy regimens. The proportion of patients using concomitant NSAID medication after 3 days was reduced by 50% in the mepivacaine group and by 76% and 100%, respectively, in the dexamethasone-21-palmitate and combination therapy groups. CT-guided infiltration treatment was well tolerated and was associated with virtually no side effects in this study.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided infiltration of dexamethasone palmitate, particularly in combination with mepivacaine, represents a safe and effective method for the acute therapy of lumbar facet syndrome. The combination is superior to the local anaesthetic alone with regard to pain reduction up to 3 days after injection.

12. Pain originating from the lumbar facet joints

Although the existence of a "facet syndrome" had long been questioned, it is now generally accepted as a clinical entity. Depending on the diagnostic criteria, the zygapophysial joints account for between 5% and 15% of cases of chronic, axial low back pain. Most commonly, facetogenic pain is the result of repetitive stress and/or cumulative low-level trauma, leading to inflammation and stretching of the joint capsule. The most frequent complaint is axial low back pain with referred pain perceived in the flank, hip, and thigh. No physical examination findings are pathognomonic for diagnosis. The strongest indicator for lumbar facet pain is pain reduction after anesthetic blocks of the rami mediales (medial branches) of the rami dorsales that innervate the facet joints. Because false-positive and, possibly, false-negative results may occur, results must be interpreted carefully. In patients with injection-confirmed zygapophysial joint pain, procedural interventions can be undertaken in the context of a multidisciplinary, multimodal treatment regimen that includes pharmacotherapy, physical therapy and regular exercise, and, if indicated, psychotherapy. Currently, the "gold standard" for treating facetogenic pain is radiofrequency treatment (1 B+). The evidence supporting intra-articular corticosteroids is limited; hence, this should be reserved for those individuals who do not respond to radiofrequency treatment (2 B±).

Single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scan-positive facet joints and other spinal structures in a hospital-wide population with spinal pain

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The current criterion standard for zygapophyseal (facet) joint pain diagnosis is placebo-controlled triple comparative local anesthetic facet joint or medial branch blocks. Single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scanning is a less invasive modality that has been widely used in patients with spinal pain for the diagnosis of facet joint arthritis. Previous studies have shown that SPECT results correlate well with response to facet joints steroid injections.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of SPECT scan-positive facet joints and other spinal areas in different age groups in a hospital-wide population with spinal pain.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

This study included 534 patients who underwent a SPECT scan for spinal pain over 7.5 years in our hospital. All referrals from all doctors for any cervical or lumbar spinal pain were included, and the results were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 486 patients (91.1%) had at least one positive abnormality on SPECT scan; 81.3% had increased uptake in different structures and regions of the spine. This included 42.8% increased uptake in the facet joint 29.8% in the vertebral bodies/end plates, and 5.9% in sacroiliac joints. The prevalence of increased uptake in the lumbosacral and cervical spine was 44% and 37%, respectively. When patients were divided into five age groups (below 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70 years and older), there was a significantly higher increased prevalence in advancing age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a hospital-wide population with spinal pain, there is a 42.88% prevalence of increased uptake in the facet joint on SPECT. The incidence increases significantly with advancing age. SPECT can play a role in investigating patients with spinal pain.

Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study design is essential in the interventional spine literature to truly evaluate whether or not a procedure is effective.

PURPOSE

This article will critically evaluate the highest quality interventional spine literature with strict interpretation of the results of these trials.

STUDY DESIGN

Review article.

METHODS

Extensive Medline/Pubmed searches and searches of the large review articles on the major interventional spine topics were performed to find all prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in the English language interventional spine literature.

RESULTS

Fluoroscopically-guided lumbosacral transforaminal epidural corticosteroid injections are effective in the treatment of acute/subacute lumbosacral radicular pain, and in preventing future surgeries. Injection of corticosteroid or Sarapin on the cervical or lumbar medical branch nerves is not effective. When done with proper technique, percutaneous radiofrequency lumbar and cervical medial branch neurotomy are both effective. Intraarticular sacroiliac joint corticosteroid injections are effective in patients with spondyloarthropathy. IDET is modestly effective in the treatment of lumbosacral discogenic pain in carefully selected patients. Percutaneous radio frequency neurotomy of the ramus communicans is effective in the treatment of lumbosacral discogenic pain. No firm conclusions can be drawn about cervical epidural corticosteroid injections, lumbosacral epidural corticosteroid injections for the treatment of chronic radicular pain, cervical or lumbosacral intraarticular zygapophysial joint corticosteroid injections for the treatment of degenerative zygapophysial joint pain, or intradiscal corticosteroid injections.

CONCLUSIONS

The prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in the interventional spine literature demonstrate efficacy from several different procedures when properly performed on appropriate patients. Other procedures have been shown to lack efficacy, while inconclusive evidence exists from multiple other interventional spine procedures. Further details are discussed in the text.

Psychopathology predicts the outcome of medial branch blocks with corticosteroid for chronic axial low back or cervical pain: a prospective cohort study

Background

Comorbid psychopathology is an important predictor of poor outcome for many types of treatments for back or neck pain. But it is unknown if this applies to the results of medial branch blocks (MBBs) for chronic low back or neck pain, which involves injecting the medial branch of the dorsal ramus nerves that innervate the facet joints. The objective of this study was to determine whether high levels of psychopathology are predictive of pain relief after MBB injections in the lumbar or cervical spine.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. Consecutive patients in a pain medicine practice undergoing MBBs of the lumbar or cervical facets with corticosteroids were recruited to participate. Subjects were selected for a MBB based on operationalized selection criteria and the procedure was performed in a standardized manner. Subjects completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) just prior to the procedure and at one-month follow up. Scores on the HADS classified the subjects into three groups based on psychiatric symptoms, which formed the primary predictor variable: Low, Moderate, or High levels of psychopathology. The primary outcome measure was the percent improvement in average daily pain rating one-month following an injection. Analysis of variance and chi-square were used to analyze the analgesia and functional rating differences between groups, and to perform a responder analysis.

Results

Eighty six (86) subjects completed the study. The Low psychopathology group (n = 37) reported a mean of 23% improvement in pain at one-month while the High psychopathology group (n = 29) reported a mean worsening of -5.8% in pain (p < .001). Forty five percent (45%) of the Low group had at least 30% improvement in pain versus 10% in the High group (p < .001). Using an analysis of covariance, no baseline demographic, social, or medical variables were significant predictors of pain improvement, nor did they mitigate the effect of psychopathology on the outcome.

Conclusion

Psychiatric comorbidity is associated with diminished pain relief after a MBB injection performed with steroid at one-month follow-up. These findings illustrate the importance of assessing comorbid psychopathology as part of a spine care evaluation.

Facet joint osteoarthritis and low back pain in the community-based population

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between lumbar spine facet joint osteoarthritis (FJ OA) identified by multidetector computed tomography (CT) and low back pain (LBP) in the community-based Framingham Heart Study.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The association between lumbar FJ OA and LBP remains unclear.

METHODS

This study was an ancillary project to the Framingham Heart Study. A sample of 3529 participants of the Framingham Heart Study aged 40 to 80 underwent multidetector CT imaging to assess aortic calcification. One hundred eighty-eight individuals were consecutively enrolled in this ancillary study to assess radiographic features associated with LBP. LBP in the preceding 12 months was evaluated using a self-report questionnaire. FJ OA was evaluated on CT scans using a 4-grade scale. The association between FJ OA and LBP was examined used multiple logistic regression models, while adjusting for gender, age, and BMI.

RESULTS

CT imaging revealed a high prevalence of FJ OA (59.6% of males and 66.7% of females). Prevalence of FJ OA increases with age. By decade, FJ OA was present in 24.0% of <40-years-olds, 44.7% of 40- to 49-years-olds, 74.2% of 50- to 59-years-olds, 89.2% of 60- to 69-year-olds, and 69.2% of >70-years-olds. By spinal level the prevalence of FJ OA was: 15.1% at L2-L3, 30.6% at L3-L4, 45.1% at L4-L5, and 38.2% at L5-S1. In this community-based population, individuals with FJ OA at any spinal level showed no association with LBP.

CONCLUSION

There is a high prevalence of FJ OA in the community. Prevalence of FJ OA increases with age with the highest prevalence at the L4-L5 spinal level. At low spinal levels women have a higher prevalence of lumbar FJ OA than men. In the present study, we failed to find an association between FJ OA, identified by multidetector CT, at any spinal level and LBP in a community-based study population.

Lumbar Facet Joint Osteoarthritis: A Review

OBJECTIVES

The facet joints (FJ) can be a potentially important source of symptoms because of the high level of mobility and load forces, especially in the lumbar area. We reviewed the anatomy, biomechanics, and possible sources of pain of the FJ, natural history, and risk factors of lumbar FJ osteoarthritis and briefly reviewed the relevant imaging methods.

METHODS

PubMed and MEDLINE databases (1950-2006) were searched for the key words "facet joints," "zygapophyseal joints," "osteoarthritis," "low back pain," and "spondyloarthritis." All relevant articles in English were reviewed. Pertinent secondary references were also retrieved.

RESULTS

The FJ play an important role in load transmission; they provide a posterior load-bearing helper, stabilizing the motion segment in flexion and extension and also restricting axial rotation. The capsule of the FJ, subchondral bone, and synovium are richly innervated and can be a potential source of the low back pain. Degenerative changes in the FJ comprise cartilage degradation that leads to the formation of focal and then diffuse erosions with joint space narrowing, and sclerosis of the subchondral bone. Because the most prominent changes occur in bone, the best method of evaluation of the FJ is computed tomography. Risk factors for lumbar FJ osteoarthritis include advanced age, relatively more sagittal orientation of the FJ, and a background of intervertebral disk degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

An up-to-date knowledge of this subject can be helpful in the development of diagnostic techniques and in the prevention of lumbar FJ osteoarthritis and low back pain and can assist in the determination of future research goals.

Prevalence of lumbar facet arthrosis and its relationship to age, sex, and race: an anatomic study of cadaveric specimens

STUDY DESIGN

An anatomic, epidemiologic study of facet arthrosis in cadaveric lumbar spines.

OBJECTIVE

To define the prevalence of lumbar facet arthrosis in a large population sample and to examine its association with age, sex, and race.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Arthrosis of lumbar facet joints is a common radiographic finding and has been linked to low back pain. However, no population studies have specifically defined the prevalence of facet arthrosis in the lumbar spine in relation to age, sex, and race.

METHODS

A total of 647 cadaveric lumbar spines were examined by a single examiner for evidence of lumbar facet arthrosis. Information on race, age, and sex were collected. Arthrosis at each facet was graded from 0 to 4 on a continuum from no arthritis to complete ankylosis.

RESULTS

Facet arthrosis was present in 53% (L1-L2), 66% (L2-L3), 72% (L3-L4), 79% (L4-L5), and 59% (L5-S1). By decade, facet arthrosis was present in 57% of 20- to 29-year-olds, 82% of 30- to 39-year-olds, 93% of 40- to 49-year-olds, 97% in 50- to 59-year-olds, and 100% in those >60 years old. Fisher exact test and t test demonstrated that men had a greater prevalence and degree of facet arthrosis than women at all lumbar levels (P < 0.001). The lumbar level with the highest prevalence and degree of arthrosis was the L4-L5 level, as compared with each of the other levels (P < 0.001). There was no difference in arthrosis between right versus left facet joints (P > 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Facet arthrosis is a universal finding in the human lumbar spine. Evidence of arthrosis begins early, with more than one half of adults younger than 30 years demonstrating arthritic changes in the facets. The most common arthritic level appears to be L4-L5. Men have a higher prevalence and degree of facet arthrosis than women.

Total dorsal ramus block for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of total dorsal ramus block, which blocks all three major branches (medial, intermediate, and lateral branches) of lumbar dorsal ramus, for chronic low back pain.

METHODS

Spread of local anesthetics with radiocontrast dye (total volume of 5 ml per administration) after total dorsal ramus block to the L4-L5 level was evaluated using computed tomography (CT) in patients with chronic low back pain (n=14; mean age, 71 years). In another group of patients, the effects of the total dorsal ramus block (n=21; mean age, 71 years) were compared with those of trigger point injection (n=22; mean age 73 years).

RESULTS

In all cases, the CT findings after total dorsal ramus block revealed the injectant spread over medial, intermediate, and lateral branches of both L3 and L4, those innervate the L4-L5 facet joint and surrounding back muscles. Significant alleviation of rest and motion pains evaluated with visual analogue scale was observed after total dorsal ramus block compared to the trigger point injection up to 7 days after the treatment (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this preliminary study show that the total dorsal ramus block procedure may sufficiently block all three branches of the lumbar dorsal ramus at the targeted level with significant pain reduction.

Injection therapy of lumbar facet syndrome: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain remains a major health problem. Facet joint injection therapy is an easy to perform therapeutic option. However, few prospective studies use a standardized protocol to investigate injection therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate quantity and duration of clinical improvement after this protocol, and to identify the best time for additional repetitive injection therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients (21 men, 18 women; mean age 55.2 years [range, 29-87 years]) with lumbar facet syndrome were treated with injection using a standardized protocol (prednisolone acetate, lidocaine 1%, phenol 5%) under fluoroscopic control. Follow-up was based on a specially designed questionnaire. Analysis included MacNab criteria, visual analogue scale, and pain disability index.

RESULTS

Reduction of pain was found up to 6 months after treatment. The outcome was assessed excellent or good by 62% (24 patients) of the patients after 1 month, by 41% (16 patients) after 3 months, and by 36% (14 patients) after 6 months. There was no influence of age, body mass index, or previous lumbar spinal surgery on improvement after treatment. There were no severe side effects. Short-lasting self limiting mild side effects were found in 26% (increased back pain, numbness, heartburn, headache, allergy).

CONCLUSION

Facet joint injection therapy using a standardized protocol is safe, effective, and easy to perform. The clinical effect is limited, and we recommend repetitive injection according to this protocol after 3 months.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Facet Joint Blocks

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to investigate outcome predictors of short- and medium-term therapeutic efficacy of facet joint blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with chronic lower back pain who were undergoing facet joint blocks at one (n = 29) or two (n = 13) levels were analyzed. All patients underwent MRI or CT of the lumbar spine within 5 months before the facet joint blocks. The facet joint blocks were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. A small amount (< 0.3 mL) of iodinated contrast agent, 0.5 mL of local anesthetics and 0.5 mL of steroids, were injected. The initial pain response was prospectively assessed using a visual analogue scale. Additional data, including short-term effect (> 1 week) and medium-term effect (> 3 months), were collected by a structured telephone interview. CT and MRI were reviewed with regard to the extent of facet joint abnormalities. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify outcome predictor for efficacy of facet joint blocks.

RESULTS

A positive immediate effect was seen in 31 patients (74%). A positive medium-term effect was found in 14 patients (33%). Pain alleviated by motion (p = 0.035) and the absence of joint-blocking sensation (p = 0.042) predicted pain relief. However, the extent of facet joint osteoarthritis on MRI and CT was not a significant predictor for outcome (p = 0.57-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Facet joint blocks appear to have a beneficial medium-term effect in one third of patients with chronic lower back pain and may therefore be a reasonable adjunct to nonoperative treatment. However, outcome appears to depend on clinical, not on morphologic, imaging findings.

A Narrative Review of Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections for Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and to analyze the available literature on the efficacy of intra-articular injections of corticosteroids for low back pain.

DESIGN

Publications, in English, French, and German, were obtained that reported the proportions of patients who obtained complete relief of pain following intra-articular steroids, and that provided any form of follow-up. These publications were analyzed to determine the rationale, indications, and outcomes of the treatment.

RESULTS

The only rationale for intra-articular steroids appears to be the expectation that they should work. The most commonly used indication has been back pain, for which no specific diagnosis has been made. When the results of observational studies are pooled, they paint a picture of impressive immediate responses, but a rapid decay of outcomes by three and six months. Initial responses, however, are dissonant with the literature from controlled studies of the prevalence of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Moreover, controlled trials have shown that there is no attributable effect to the injection of steroids.

CONCLUSION

The apparent efficacy of lumbar intra-articular steroids is no greater than that of a sham injection. There is no justification for the continued use of this intervention. Better outcomes can be achieved with deliberate placebo therapy.

Lumbar zygapophyseal joint injections in patients with chronic lower back pain

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to assess the diagnostic value and clinical benefits of lumbar zygapophyseal joint injections in patients with chronic lower back pain.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-seven patients (136 males and 141 females, aged 15-82 years) with chronic lower back pain were enrolled in the trial and met the following criteria: pain for more than 1 year; no root signs; and no history of back surgery. Under fluoroscope, a 0.8-1.5 mL mixture of lidocaine, betamethasone dipropionate and iopamidol (1:1:0.5) was injected into each joint after intra-articular localization of the needle tip was confirmed. A questionnaire with a pain scale was administered immediately or the day after injection, and then after 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks. Partial arthrograms were reviewed by a radiologist.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-nine joint injections were performed in 277 patients (L3-4, n = 76; L4-5, n = 272; L5-S1, n = 101). Bilateral injections were performed in 117 patients (42.2%). The study group comprised 204 patients (73.6%) with an excellent or good response, whereas the control group comprised the remaining 73 patients (26.4%). The rates of good response in the study group were 72.1% (147/204) after 3 weeks, 40.7% (83/204) after 6 weeks, and 31.4% (64/204) after 12 weeks. Partial arthrograms revealed 25 patients (9.0%) with synovial cysts (L3-4, n = 3; L4-5, n = 14; L5-S1, n = 8); 23 of these patients (92.0%) had a good response to the injections. Five of the 6 patients with spondylolysis (83.3%), having abnormal communication between the injected and contiguous joint, had a good response to the injections. The abovementioned, abnormal partial-arthrogram findings correlated significantly with the rate of good response to the injections. Although 3 patients had contrast medium extravasated into the epidural space during injection, none of the 277 patients had deteriorating lower back pain after the injections.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar zygapophyseal joint injections, as a useful diagnostic tool for facet joint syndrome, could also have useful palliative effects in the management of chronic lower back pain.

Image-guided spinal injection for diagnosis and therapy

Over the past decade, major advances have been made in our ability to identify a putative cause of patients' spinal pain using image-guided injection techniques. These techniques might also provide a means of temporarily relieving patients' pain and facilitating increased mobility. This article aims to review the rationale for and the techniques of the more commonly used spinal injection techniques.

Facet blocks and sacroiliac joint injections

Facet and sacroiliac joint pathology are not an uncommon cause of back or neck pain. Imaging-guided techniques provide ready access to these synovial joints. Percutaneous injection of the facet or sacroiliac joints yields important diagnostic information as to whether or not the interrogated joint is involved in the patient's pain syndrome. The injection of a steroid-anesthetic mixture into these joints is capable of providing significant, albeit temporary, pain relief.

Facet Joint Pain and the Role of Neural Blockade in Its Management

Chronic spinal pain is a common medical problem with serious financial and social consequences. Among the various structures with potential for producing pain in the spine, facet joints as sources of chronic spinal pain have attracted considerable attention and controversy. Significant progress has been made in precision diagnosis of spinal pain with neural blockade, in the face of less than optimal diagnostic information offered by imaging and neurophysiologic studies. Research into the role of facet joints in spinal pain has shown that cervical facet joints are the cause of chronic neck pain in 54% to 60% of patients, whereas lumbar facet joints cause pain in 15% to 40% of patients with chronic low back pain. Local anesthetic blocks of medial branches have proven to be a reliable diagnostic test; they are target-specific when used appropriately with control blocks, either with two local anesthetics with different durations of action or with the addition of an inactive placebo injection. The literature is replete with reports on uncontrolled studies, case reports, and documentation from a few controlled studies, all of which offer supporting information on the rationale and effectiveness of facet blocks and neurotomy. Facet joint injections and medial branch blocks are considered to be of equal value. Lumbar intra-articular steroid injections have been proven effective to a certain extent, but evidence indicates that cervical intra-articular steroids are ineffective. The role of repeat medial branch blocks is not known. Radiofrequency neurotomy remains the only practical and validated treatment for cervical facet joint pain; however, its role in management of either lumbar or thoracic facet joint pain awaits validation.

Randomized trial of radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation for chronic low back pain

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective double-blind randomized trial in 31 patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints in reducing pain, functional disability, and physical impairment in patients with back pain originating from the lumbar zygapophysial joints.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Chronic low back pain is a major health problem in the industrialized world. A treatment option is percutaneous radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Its clinical efficacy has never been formally tested in a controlled trial.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with a history of at least 1 year of chronic low back pain were selected on the basis of a positive response to a diagnostic nerve blockade and subsequently randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Each patient in the radiofrequency treatment group (15 patients) received an 80 C radiofrequency lesion of the dorsal ramus of the segmental nerve roots L3, L4, and L5. Patients in the control group (n = 16) underwent an the same procedure but without use of a radiofrequency current. Both the treating physician and the patients were blinded to the group assignment. Before treatment, physical impairment, rating of pain, the degree of disability, and quality of life were assessed by a blinded investigator.

RESULTS

Eight weeks after treatment, there were 10 success patients in the radiofrequency group (n = 15) and 6 in the sham group (n = 16). The unadjusted odds ratio was 3.3 (P = 0.05, not significant), and the adjusted odds ratio was 4.8 (P < 0.05, significant). The differences in effect on the visual analog scale scores, global perceived effect, and the Oswestry disability scale were statistically significant. Three, 6, and 12 months after treatment, there were significantly more success patients in the radiofrequency group compared with the sham group.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency lumbar zygapophysial joint denervation results in a significant alleviation of pain and functional disability in a select group of patients with chronic low back pain, both on a short-term and a long-term basis.

Symptomatic lumbar facet joint synovial cysts: clinical assessment of facet joint steroid injection after 1 and 6 months and long-term follow-up in 30 patients

PURPOSE

To study the results of facet joint intraarticular steroid injections in patients with symptomatic lumbar facet joint synovial cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 30 patients (age range, 44-82 years; mean age, 67 years) with nerve root pain due to a lumbar facet joint synovial cyst and treated with facet joint steroid injection were retrospectively studied. On the basis of MacNab criteria, the clinical course of nerve root pain was evaluated after 1 (n = 30) and 6 (n = 28) months. Data from long-term follow-up (mean, 26 months) were also available in 14 nonsurgically treated patients.

RESULTS

After 1 month, the nerve root pain outcome was excellent or good in 20 patients (67%) and fair or poor in 10 (33%). After 6 months, 10 (50%) of these 20 patients still had excellent or good results, and 18 (60%) of the 30 patients had a fair or poor clinical status, 14 of whom underwent surgery; two patients (7%) were lost to follow-up. Excellent and good results were maintained at further follow-up (range, 9-50 months).

CONCLUSION

One-third of patients with symptomatic lumbar facet joint synovial cysts had long-lasting acceptable benefit from facet joint steroid injections in this study. Steroid injection should be indicated before surgery.

Diagnostic and therapeutic features of facet and sacroiliac joint injection. Anatomy, pathophysiology, and technique

A diagnosis of exclusion facet syndrome is considered one of the many genuine causes of low back pain. Using careful patient selection, percutaneous facet joint block is a useful diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in the management of lumbar facet syndrome. Sacroiliac joint syndrome appears to be a more tangible entity diagnostically and more amenable to injection. This article addresses the anatomy, pathophysiology, and salient radiographic features of the apophyseal joint, and describes the procedures and techniques for facet as well as sacroiliac joint injection.

Percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy of lumbar spinal facets: the results of 46 cases

The results of percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy of lumbar spinal facets in 46 patients followed at least three months (mean 15 months) are reported and compared with those reported previously. Satisfactory pain relief three months after the procedure was achieved in 36.4 percent of patients without operations and in 41.7 percent of patients, with operations other than fusion. No patient had previously undergone fusion. Treatment of low-back pain by using radio-frequency thermocoagulation of spinal facets is a simple, safe, and well-tolerated procedure. It can be used to relief of pain in spite of decreasing rates of success within the follow-up period.

Therapeutic infiltration of the facet joint in minor intervertebral disease

SUMMARY

A CT-guided infiltration technique of the facet joints was employed on a group of 20 patients suffering from sciatica without any signs ofmorphostructural alteration of the facet joints, secondary to Minor Intervertebral Disease (MID). The typical flouroscopically guided intra-articular facet arthrography has been substituted by a CT-guided technique that privileges therapy rather than diagnosis. The study involved 20 patients between 29 and 57 years of age (average 44.5), of both sexes (16 females and four males). The average time which elapsed from onset of symptomatology was 9.5 months. At seven days after the first treatment subjective results were considered excellent by 11 patients (55%), good by one (5%) and satisfactory by one (5%). Six out of20 patients (30%) failed to gain any relief of symptoms. Only one patient (5%) had a worsening of pain. Clinical evaluation by the physician at the same time showed a good result in 11 patients (55%), satisfactory in two (10%). In six patients (30%) the symptomatology was unchanged. At 4 months the subjective results were excellent in three (15%), good in six (30%) and satisfactory in two (10%) . Nine (45%) had no positive results. The clinical examination was excellent in tWo (10%), good in seven (35%), satisfactory in two (10%) and without any relief of symptomatology in nine (45%). These results encourage the use of CT-guided infiltration that, together with the small amount of contrast medium injected into the joint space, make it a safe technique for patients, avoiding or reducing complications.

Low back pain and the zygapophysial (facet) joints

A basic science and clinical review of low back pain due to the lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joints was performed based on a literature search of scientific journals and textbooks. Recent studies estimate that 15% to 40% of chronic low back pain is due to the zygapophysial joints. The histological basis for zygapophysial joint pain has been scientifically established, but the precise clinical etiology remains undetermined. There are no unique identifying features in the history, physical examination, and radiological imaging of patients with pain of lumbar zygapophysial joint origin. Spine physicians diagnose zygapophysial joint pain based on analgesic response to anesthetic injections into the zygapophysial joints or at their nerve supply. Studies on treatment of isolated zygapophysial joint pain are limited. This review summarizes current understanding of lumbar zygapophysial joint disorders while highlighting the need for additional research.

C1-2 arthrography

OBJECTIVE

To describe the technique of C1-2 arthrography and recommend it as a suitable treatment for pain due to C1-2 abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients with the following conditions were studied: cervical pain or neuralgia without radiographic changes (group 1, n = 23), osteoarthritis (group 2, n = 37), rheumatoid arthritis (group 3, n = 23), ankylosing spondylarthritis (group 4, n = 5) and diverse conditions (group 5, n = 12). The technique consists of lateral puncture of the posterior aspect of the C1-2 joint with a 20-gauge needle under fluoroscopic control, arthrography using 1 ml contrast medium, and a 1-ml long-acting steroid injection subsequently.

RESULTS

The articular cavity has an anterior and a posterior recess. Sometimes the posterior recess is large. In 18% of cases the contralateral joint also opacifies.

CONCLUSIONS

C1-2 arthrography appears to be an efficient and safe technique for the treatment of upper cervical pain due to C1-2 articular disorders.

Prevalence and clinical features of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain: a study in an Australian population with chronic low back pain

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of pain arising from the zygapophysial joint in patients with chronic low back pain and to determine whether any clinical features could distinguish patients with and without such pain.

METHODS

Sixty three patients with chronic low back pain were studied prospectively. All patients underwent a detailed history and physical examination as well as a series of intra-articular zygapophysial joint injections of 0.5% bupivacaine starting at the symptomatic level to a maximum of three levels or until the pain was abolished. They also received injections of normal saline into paraspinal muscles to act as controls.

RESULTS

All patients proceeded with the injections. Twenty (32%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 20 to 44%) obtained greater than 50% relief of their pain following the administration of saline. Fifty seven patients completed the study; 23 of them (40%; 95% CI 27 to 53%) failed to obtain relief following the injection of saline but obtained relief following one or more intra-articular injections of local anaesthetic. None of the historical features or clinical tests could discriminate those patients with and those without zygapophysial joint pain.

CONCLUSION

Pain originating from the zygapophysial joint is not uncommon, but this study failed to find any clinical predictors in patients with such pain.

The false-positive rate of uncontrolled diagnostic blocks of the lumbar zygapophysial joints

One hundred and seventy-six consecutive patients with chronic low back pain and no history of previous lumbar surgery were studied to determine the false-positive rate of single diagnostic blocks of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. All patients underwent diagnostic blocks using lignocaine. Those patients who obtained definite or complete relief from these blocks subsequently underwent confirmatory blocks using bupivacaine. Eighty-three patients (47%) had a definite or greater response to the initial, lignocaine injection at one or more levels but only 26 (15%) had a 50% or greater response to a confirmatory injection of 0.5% bupivacaine. Using the response to confirmatory blocks as the criterion standard, the false-positive rate of uncontrolled diagnostic blocks was 38% and the positive predictive value of these blocks was only 31%. Because the positive predictive value of a test is lower when the pre-test probability (prevalence) is low, and because the prevalence of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain is likely to be less than 50%, uncontrolled diagnostic blocks will always be associated with an unacceptably low positive predictive value. These features render uncontrolled diagnostic blocks unreliable for the diagnosis of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain not only in epidemiologic studies but also in any given patient.

The management of chronic spinal pain by blockades: a review

This review of the use of blockades in the diagnosis and symptomatic treatment of spinal pain syndromes is based on increasing knowledge of the innervation of the spine as their rationale. Several clinical syndromes related to the spine are considered. Problems in making a correct diagnosis are discussed. Because of the relative aspecificity of signs and symptoms in spinal pain, a substantial part of the diagnosis may rely on test blockades. The place of test and therapeutic blocks is determined as far as possible. Problems of a pain classification system are discussed. Benefit for the patient depends on the following conditions being achieved: correct diagnosis, careful patient selection, the availability of technical equipment (e.g., fluoroscopy), and a well-designed and well-performed technique in experienced hands.

Radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation: analysis of prognostic factors

Percutaneous radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation has been in use as a treatment for intractable, mechanical low back pain for over 2 decades. A number of case series have been reported with high rates of success in selected patients; however, there has been limited objective outcome assessment, long-term follow-up, and analysis of prognostic factors. We have reviewed our experience with diagnostic lumbar facet blocks and percutaneous radiofrequency denervation at a mean follow-up interval of 3.2 years. Long-term outcome has been assessed by disinterested third party interview. Of 82 patients selected for these procedures, 56 had undergone prior low back surgery. Following diagnostic medial branch posterior primary ramus blocks, 42 reported at least 50% relief of pain and proceeded to radiofrequency denervation. Forty-five percent of patients undergoing denervation reported at least 50% relief of pain at long-term follow-up. Among the 40 patients who only underwent temporary blocks, 13% reported relief (i.e., spontaneous improvement or placebo effect) by at least 50% at long-term follow-up). By multivariate statistical analysis, patients undergoing bilateral blocks for bilateral or axial symptoms were significantly more likely to achieve temporary relief, and to proceed to permanent denervation. There was no difference, however, between the long-term results of bilateral denervation for bilateral or axial pain and those of unilateral denervation for unilateral pain. There was no significant difference in the rate of response between the 56 patients who had undergone prior lumbosacral spine surgery and the 26 who had not. There were no complications from the procedure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lumbosacral spine imaging: physioanatomic method

Noninvasive evaluation of low back and leg pain has progressed rapidly over the past decade. The development of computed tomography, single-photon emission-computed tomographic bone scan, and magnetic resonance imaging has markedly increased diagnostic accuracy in detecting pathologic conditions. With this increased accuracy has come recognition of a 50% prevalence of underlying abnormalities in patients between 20 and 60 years old who have no symptoms. When such patients have a back injury, subsequent imaging will show in half of the population studied abnormalities that are not related to an acute injury. Degeneration of the spine progresses in all patients throughout their lifetime, and nearly all of the population will have back discomfort at some time. Political- and judicial-based compensation for back injuries related to accidents and on-the-job injuries provides an incentive for patients not to improve on therapy and to exaggerate symptoms, further complicating the clinical evaluation of their condition. The goal of physioanatomic noninvasive and invasive imaging evaluation presented in the following chapters is to increase specificity by differentiating pain generators from asymptomatic underlying pathologic conditions. When used with intensive conservative management and psychologic testing, this physioanatomic approach has resulted in much better treatment outcomes in our experience. The physioanatomic approach is quite simple, consisting of rigorous correlation of pathologic changes demonstrated by noninvasive imaging modalities (computed tomography, single-photon emission-computed tomographic bone scan, and magnetic resonance), or invasive modalities (diskography-enhanced computed tomography, nerve root block and facet block) with the patient's symptoms to evaluate whether the symptoms and the pathologic lesion are concordant or discordant. Patient symptoms and history are evaluated by use of a pain drawing and information sheet. The patient's pain pattern is categorized into a nonspecific pattern or into one of four recognizable pathway patterns (radicular, dorsal ramus, polyneuropathy, and sympathetic). Because each spinal lesion is typically manifested primarily via one of the four symptom pathways, the distribution of expected symptoms from each pathologic feature can be compared with the patient's pain drawing, and an assessment of the significance of imaged lesions can be made. The patient's presenting symptoms are also used to determine the most cost-effective and efficacious use of initial diagnostic imaging evaluation. In a minority of patients the findings on noninvasive imaging either will not correlate with the patient's symptoms or will demonstrate multiple abnormalities that could account for the patient's symptoms. In these patients, invasive techniques are extremely helpful in defining a pain generator or pain generators.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A comparative study of the anatomical, radiological and therapeutic features of the lumbar facet joints

An anatomical study of the lumbar apophyseal joints was carried out to facilitate recognition of facet joint lesions, which we now examine routinely by percutaneous arthrography. Special attention was given to the configuration of the different compartments of the joint space and to its relationships with the contents of the intervertebral foramen. The abnormalities seen on lumbar facet joint arthrography are very varied; two major groups should be stressed: synovial fringe hypertrophy and pseudodiverticular synovial ectasia. The percutaneous approach to lumbar facet joint arthrography allows it to be used a therapeutic measure, with injection of anti-inflammatory drugs into the joint space, the beneficial effects of which were confirmed in our series. The precision, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of this outpatient technique justify and should encourage its more widespread application in the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.

Cervical analgesic facet joint arthrography

We report on our experience with cervical analgesic facet joint arthrography in 11 patients (30 joints), of whom nine had previous spinal surgery. In this type of patient we have found the procedure to be a diagnostic test as well as a preoperative guide to the neurosurgeon, but not a permanent therapy.