1
|
Shinagare AB, Sadowski EA, Park H, Brook OR, Forstner R, Wallace SK, Horowitz JM, Horowitz N, Javitt M, Jha P, Kido A, Lakhman Y, Lee SI, Manganaro L, Maturen KE, Nougaret S, Poder L, Rauch GM, Reinhold C, Sala E, Thomassin-Naggara I, Vargas HA, Venkatesan A, Nikolic O, Rockall AG. Ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging developed by the SAR Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and the ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Working Group. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:3220-3235. [PMID: 34846566 PMCID: PMC9516633 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08390-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Imaging evaluation is an essential part of treatment planning for patients with ovarian cancer. Variation in the terminology used for describing ovarian cancer on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in clinical radiology reports. The aim of this collaborative project between Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Uterine and Ovarian Cancer (UOC) Disease-focused Panel (DFP) and the European Society of Uroradiology (ESUR) Female Pelvic Imaging (FPI) Working Group was to develop an ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging. METHODS Twenty-one members of the SAR UOC DFP and ESUR FPI working group, one radiology clinical fellow, and two gynecologic oncology surgeons formed the Ovarian Cancer Reporting Lexicon Committee. Two attending radiologist members of the committee prepared a preliminary list of imaging terms that was sent as an online survey to 173 radiologists and gynecologic oncologic physicians, of whom 67 responded to the survey. The committee reviewed these responses to create a final consensus list of lexicon terms. RESULTS An ovarian cancer reporting lexicon was created for CT and MR Imaging. This consensus-based lexicon has 6 major categories of terms: general, adnexal lesion-specific, peritoneal carcinomatosis-specific, lymph node-specific, metastatic disease -specific, and fluid-specific. CONCLUSIONS This lexicon for CT and MR imaging evaluation of ovarian cancer patients has the capacity to improve the clarity and consistency of reporting disease sites seen on imaging. KEY POINTS • This reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging provides a list of consensus-based, standardized terms and definitions for reporting sites of ovarian cancer on imaging at initial diagnosis or follow-up. • Use of standardized terms and morphologic imaging descriptors can help improve interdisciplinary communication of disease extent and facilitate optimal patient management. • The radiologists should identify and communicate areas of disease, including difficult to resect or potentially unresectable disease that may limit the ability to achieve optimal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atul B Shinagare
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A Sadowski
- Departments of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/372, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
| | - Hyesun Park
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Olga R Brook
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1 Deaconess Rd, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Rosemarie Forstner
- Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstr. 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sumer K Wallace
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave. H4/664A, Madison, WI, 53792, USA
| | - Jeanne M Horowitz
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N Saint Clair, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Neil Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Marcia Javitt
- Medical Imaging, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Priyanka Jha
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0628, USA
| | - Aki Kido
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoinkawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, 6068507, Japan
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66 Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Susanna I Lee
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Lucia Manganaro
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, V.le Regina Elena, 324 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- Department of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 E Med Ctr Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | | | - Liina Poder
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UCSF, 505 Parnassus Ave, L-374, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0628, USA
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Caroline Reinhold
- Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory of the Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 1001 Decarie boul., Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 218, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d'Imagerie, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Herbert Alberto Vargas
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66 Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Aradhana Venkatesan
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., FCT 15.6074, MSC 1182, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Olivera Nikolic
- Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Center of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 1-9 Hajduk Veljkova str. 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Andrea G Rockall
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, ICTEM Building, Du Cane Rd, London, W12 0NN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jha P, Sakala M, Chamie LP, Feldman M, Hindman N, Huang C, Kilcoyne A, Laifer-Narin S, Nicola R, Poder L, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Tong A, VanBuren W, Taffel MT. Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:1552-1568. [PMID: 31728612 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02291-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is a common gynecologic disorder characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue outside the endometrial cavity. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a mainstay for diagnosis and staging of this disease. In the literature, significant heterogeneity exists in the descriptions of imaging findings and anatomic sites of involvement. The Society of Abdominal Radiology's Endometriosis Disease-Focused Panel presents this consensus document to establish an MRI lexicon for endometriosis MRI evaluation and anatomic localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Jha
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Michelle Sakala
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine (University of Michigan), Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Luciana Pardini Chamie
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chamié Imagem da Mulher, Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Myra Feldman
- Cleveland Clinic Imaging Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nicole Hindman
- Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chenchan Huang
- Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Aoife Kilcoyne
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sherelle Laifer-Narin
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University / New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Refky Nicola
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Liina Poder
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle
- Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Angela Tong
- Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wendy VanBuren
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Myles T Taffel
- Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Le O. Patterns of peritoneal spread of tumor in the abdomen and pelvis. World J Radiol 2013; 5:106-12. [PMID: 23671747 PMCID: PMC3650201 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2012] [Revised: 09/20/2012] [Accepted: 01/31/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The spread of tumor in the peritoneum can be understood, although it is a complex organ. A study of its embryology, anatomy and function is of clear benefit. It is formed from a network of folds, reflections, and potential spaces produced by the visceral and parietal peritoneum. These folds and reflections begin as a dorsal and ventral mesentery, supporting the primitive gut in early embryologic development. The dorsal mesentery connects the stomach and other organs to the posterior abdominal wall, while the ventral mesentery connects the stomach to the ventral abdominal wall. As the embryo develops, there is further organ growth, elongation, cavitation and rotation. The dorsal and ventral mesentery also develops along with the viscera, forming ligaments, mesenteries, omenta and potential spaces from the resulting reflections and folds. These ligaments, mesenteries, and omenta, support and nurture the organs of the peritoneum, providing a highway for arteries, veins, nerves and lymphatics. The potential spaces created from these folds and reflections of the visceral and parietal peritoneum are also important to realize. For example, the transverse mesocolon divides the peritoneal cavity into a supramesocolic and inframesocolic space in the abdomen and paravesicular spaces within the pelvis. The falciform ligament is well known in the supramesocolic space, dividing it further into a left and right compartment. Knowledge of the peritoneal vascular anatomy is beneficial in locating the spaces and ligaments about the peritoneum. For example, identifying the left gastric artery or vein will lead to the gastrohepatic ligament, which is part of the supramesocolic space. Besides serving a life sustaining role, the multiple compartments, ligaments, mesenteries and omenta within the peritoneum can also facilitate the spread of disease. Tumors can spread directly from one organ to another, seed metastatic deposits in the peritoneal cavity, and travel through the lymphatic or hematogenous route to invade other organs in the peritoneum.
Collapse
|
6
|
Quagliano PV, Delair SM, Malhotra AK. Diagnosis of blunt bladder injury: A prospective comparative study of computed tomography cystography and conventional retrograde cystography. THE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA 2006; 61:410-21; discussion 421-2. [PMID: 16917459 DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000229940.36556.bf] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to evaluate prospectively the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) cystography for the detection of bladder rupture, performed concurrently with screening abdominal/pelvic CT, in patients at risk for blunt bladder injury. The study also aimed to validate our proposed method of performing CT cystography, which was designed to minimize the time and effort required to image the bladder. METHODS CT cystography was performed on patients at risk for blunt bladder injury. Retrograde filling of the bladder with dilute iodinated contrast material was performed before routine abdominal/pelvic CT scanning, performed with oral and intravenous contrast. Conventional cystography, when performed, followed CT cystography. RESULTS CT cystography, followed by conventional cystography, was performed in 212 patients, among whom 19 had bladder rupture. The CT cystography sensitivity and specificity for bladder rupture in these patients was 95% and 100%, respectively; for conventional cystography, sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 100%, respectively. CT cystography was performed without conventional cystography in 283 patients, among whom 27 had bladder rupture. The sensitivity and specificity of CT cystography for bladder rupture in these patients were both 100%. CONCLUSIONS CT cystography is equivalent to conventional cystography for detecting the presence or absence of blunt bladder injury. CT cystography can be performed as an integral part of the CT screening undergone by many blunt trauma patients and, in the vast majority of these patients, it can alleviate the need for a separate conventional cystogram.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter V Quagliano
- Department of Radiology, McGuire Veterans Medical Center, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23249, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|