Distribution of a breast-directed I-131-radiolabeled monoclonal antibody in blood and bone marrow: implications for radiation immunotherapy

Bone marrow dosimetry using 124I-PET

Bone marrow is usually dose-limiting for radioimmunotherapy. In this study, we directly estimated red marrow activity concentration and the self-dose component of absorbed radiation dose to red marrow based on PET/CT of 2 different (124)I-labeled antibodies (cG250 and huA33) and compared the results with plasma activity concentration and plasma-based dose estimates.

METHODS

Two groups of patients injected with (124)I-labeled monoclonal antibodies (11 patients with renal cancer receiving (124)I-cG250 and 5 patients with colorectal cancer receiving (124)I- huA33) were imaged by PET or PET/CT on 2 or 3 occasions after infusion. Regions of interest were drawn over several lumbar vertebrae, and red marrow activity concentration was quantified. Plasma activity concentration was also quantified using multiple patient blood samples. The red marrow-to-plasma activity concentration ratio (RMPR) was calculated at the times of imaging. The self-dose component of the absorbed radiation dose to the red marrow was estimated from the images, from the plasma measurements, and using a combination of both sets of measurements.

RESULTS

RMPR was observed to increase with time for both groups of patients. Mean (±SD) time-dependent RMPR (RMPR(t)) for the cG250 group increased from 0.13 ± 0.06 immediately after infusion to 0.23 ± 0.09 at approximately 6 d after infusion. For the huA33 group, mean RMPR(t) was 0.10 ± 0.04 immediately after infusion, 0.13 ± 0.05 approximately 2 d after infusion, and 0.20 ± 0.09 approximately 7 d after infusion. Plasma-based estimates of red marrow self-dose tended to be greater than image-based values by, on average, 11% and 47% for cG250 and huA33, respectively, but by as much as -73% to 62% for individual patients. The hybrid method combining RMPR(t) and plasma activity concentration provided a closer match to the image-based dose estimates (average discrepancies, -2% and 18% for cG250 and huA33, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the assumption of time-independent proportionality between red marrow and plasma activity concentration may be too simplistic. Individualized imaged-based dosimetry is probably required for the optimal therapeutic delivery of radiolabeled antibodies, which does not compromise red marrow and may allow, for some patients, a substantial increase in administered activity and thus tumor dose.

Graft-versus-host disease causes failure of donor hematopoiesis and lymphopoiesis in interferon-gamma receptor-deficient hosts

The immunopathologic condition known as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) results from a type I T-cell process. However, a prototypical type I cytokine, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), can protect against several manifestations of GVHD in recipients of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched hematopoietic cells. We transplanted hematopoietic cells from C3H.SW donors in wild-type (wt) and IFN-gamma-receptor-deficient (IFN-gammaRKO) MHC-matched C57BL/6 recipients. In IFN-gammaRKO recipients, host cells were unresponsive to IFN-gamma, whereas wt donor cells were exposed to exceptionally high levels of IFN-gamma. From an IFN-gamma perspective, we could therefore evaluate the impact of a loss-of-function on host cells and gain-of-function on donor cells. We found that lack of IFN-gammaR prevented up-regulation of MHC proteins on host cells but did not mitigate damage to most target organs. Two salient phenotypes in IFN-gammaRKO recipients involved donor cells: lymphoid hypoplasia and hematopoietic failure. Lymphopenia was due to FasL-induced apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation. Bone marrow aplasia resulted from a decreased proliferation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells that was associated with down-regulation of 2 genes negatively regulated by IFN-gamma: Ccnd1 and Myc. We conclude that IFN-gamma produced by alloreactive T cells may entail a severe graft-versus-graft reaction and could be responsible for cytopenias that are frequently observed in subjects with GVHD.

Time dependence of the activity concentration ratio of red marrow to blood and implications for red marrow dosimetry

BACKGROUND

The method for red marrow dosimetry in radioimmunotherapy, in the absence of specific activity uptake in red marrow, is based on the activity measured in the blood or plasma. The activity concentration ratio of red marrow to blood is then assumed to be constant. The aim of the current study was to determine whether this ratio varies with time after injection.

METHODS

Measurements were carried out with both animals and patients.Tumor-bearing rats were intravenously injected with iodine-131-, iodine-125-, indium-111-, or rhenium-188-labeled BR96, a chimeric immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody. (All were chelate-labeled, except for iodine-131, which was iodogen-labeled.) Measurements were made of the activity concentration in blood and bone marrow at different points in time after injection, and the ratio of activity concentration in red marrow and blood as a function of time postinjection (RMBLR[t)]) was calculated. For patients treated with iodine-131-labeled monoclonal antibody (LL2, Immunomedics Inc., Morris Plains, NJ; anti-CD22; immunoglobulin G2 isotype of mouse origin), blood samples were drawn and scintillation camera images taken at different times after injection. The red marrow activity concentration in the sacrum was determined by activity quantification from regions of interest. The activity concentration in blood was also measured. The RMBLR(t) was calculated based on these data.

RESULTS

For both patients and rats, the RMBLR(t) was increased 72 hours after injection. Furthermore, it was found that the use of a constant RMBLR can lead to an over- or underestimation of the absorbed dose in bone marrow.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate the difficulty in using fixed values of the activity concentration ratio of red marrow to blood for dosimetry.

Radioimmunotherapy of solid cancers: A review

Depending on radionuclide characteristics, radioimmunotherapy (RIT) relies on radioactivity to destroy cells distant from immunotargeted cells. Therefore, even heterogeneous tumors (for antigen recognition) can be treated, because not all cells have to be targeted. Substantial complete response rates have been reported in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Much more modest results have been reported for patients with bulky solid tumors, e.g. adenocarcinomas. The radiation doses delivered by targeting antibodies are generally too low to achieve major therapeutic responses. Dose escalation is limited by myelotoxicity, and higher doses need to be delivered to neoplasms less radiosensitive than lymphomas. Various trials for both systemic and regional RIT have been reported on. Intraperitoneal administration has been applied for colorectal and ovarian carcinomas. Our own results indicate that, e.g., intraperitoneal pseudomyxoma can be treated with RIT. Myelotoxicity can be reduced by anti-antibody-enhancement, 2- and 3-step strategies, bispecific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), and extracorporeal immunoadsorption. The radionuclide has to be selected properly for each purpose; it can be a beta-emitter, e.g. I-131, Y-90, Re-188, Re-186, Lu-177 or Sm-153, an alpha-emitter At-211 or Bi-212 or an Auger-emitter, e.g. I-125, I-123. One major problem with RIT, besides slow penetration rate into tumor tissue and low tumor-to-normal tissue ratio, is the HAMA response, which can be partly avoided by the use of humanized MAbs and immunosuppression. However, RIT will be, because of all the recent developments, an important form of cancer management.

Radioimmunodetection of malignant solid tumours

An increased clinical utility of radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies (MoAb), recognizing a variety of different antigens expressed preferentially in malignant tissue, for localizing primary, metastatic and recurrent cancer has been documented in many recent investigations. This review focuses on both basic and practical aspects of radioimmunodetection in oncology and is a status report on the performance and limitations of radiolabelled antibody procedures currently applied to the clinical detection of malignant solid tumours. At this time clinically validated radioimmunodetection methods are available for colorectal, ovarian, breast, lung, thyroid medullary, and head and neck carcinoma, and melanoma. Recent advances in humanization of MoAb significantly improve the prospects of effective antibody-guided radiotherapy in the near future.

Phase II radioimmunotherapy trial with 131I-CC49 in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiolabeled CC49, a second generation high affinity monoclonal antibody (MoAb) reactive with tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG72) has undergone previous Phase I testing in patients with colon cancer. Based on this report, the authors treated 15 refractory metastatic colon cancer patients with 131I-CC49 to determine its overall toxicity and the response to therapy of patients treated with it.

METHODS

Patients received 75 mCi/m2 131I-CC49 (20 mg MoAb) intravenously for a period of 30-60 minutes. Whole body retention was derived from the measured dose-rate of I-131 monitored daily at 1 m using an ion chamber. Two whole-body and static-gamma camera images were taken of patients on days 4 and 7 after the infusion.

RESULTS

Nonhematologic toxicity (Grade 1-2) consisted of nausea (two patients), arthralgias (three patients), transient fever and chills (two patients), and transient blood pressure changes (two patients). At 4-5 weeks posttreatment, reversible Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 7 of 15 patients, and reversible Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia was observed in 6 of 15 patients. Twelve of 13 patients tested developed human anti-mouse antibody (range, 161 to > 20,000 ng/ml) at 6-8 weeks postinfusion. Mean +/- SD whole-body half-life (whole-body retention) of 131I-CC49 was 57.3 +/- 13.4 hours. Tumors were seen in all patients. In two of three patients treated a second time, an increased whole body clearance rate correlated with elevated human anti-mouse antibody, reduced uptake in tumor, and enhanced uptake in the thyroid. Estimated tumor doses ranged from 19-667 rads. Red marrow dose estimated from whole body retention ranged from 60 to 117 rads and correlated with decreases in platelet count. No objective tumor responses (i.e., partial or complete) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite minimal toxicity and favorable tumor uptake, efficacy has been limited at this dose and schedule.