Development of stenoses in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt followed by splenectomy for complicated hepatosplenic schistosomiasis: a case report and review of the literature

Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis is a complex clinical condition caused by the complications of chronic infection with Schistosoma species that cause intestinal schistosomiasis. Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis derives from the fibrotic reaction stimulated around parasite eggs that are transported by the mesenteric circulation to the liver, causing periportal fibrosis. Portal hypertension and variceal gastrointestinal bleeding are major complications of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. The clinical management of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis is not standardised and a parameter that could guide clinical decision making has not yet been identified. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) appears promising for use in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis but is still reported in very few patients. In this Grand Round, we report one patient with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis treated with TIPS, which resulted in regression of oesophageal varices but had to be followed by splenectomy due to persisting severe splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia. We summarise the main challenges in the clinical management of this patient with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis, highlight results of a scoping review of the literature, and evaluate the use of of TIPS in patients with early hepatosplenic schistosomiasis, to improve the prognosis.

Percutaneous revision of dysfunctional shunts in patients who underwent intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure via percutaneous or conventional method: 11-years single center experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Our primary objective is to report the results of the ultrasound (US)-guided revision technique of transhepatic shunt in patients in whom intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was created by the percutaneous or conventional route. Our secondary objective is to investigate whether there is an association between the indication for a portosystemic shunt and the need for post-shunt revision.

METHODS

Data from 117 consecutive patients who had a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placed percutaneously or conventionally were extracted from hospital electronic medical records and examined those who underwent revision within 11 years and those who did not. US-guided transhepatic shunt revision technique was evaluated in terms of technical success, complications, and patency. In addition, the relationship between etiology and the need for revision was also examined using the chi-square test in three groups.

RESULTS

Forty six point two percent of patients who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt required one or more revisions within 11 years. While patency of the shunt could be established via the transjugular route in 83.3% of revision patients, it was necessary to use the transhepatic route in 16.7%. The technical success rate for the US-guided transhepatic shunt revision method was 100%, and the pressure gradient between the portal and hepatic venous systems decreased below 10 mmHg in all patients at the end of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

US-guided transhepatic shunt revision is a safe and effective method where transjugular revision cannot be performed. In addition, the revision rate is significantly higher in patients who have undergone transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt due to Budd-Chiari syndrome compared with other groups.

Added Value of Covered Stents in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: A Large Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) were historically placed using uncovered bare-metal stents. Current practice has now shifted toward the use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stents, given the improved primary patency seen with these stents. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any added value, such as overall survival or stent patency, when using covered stents versus uncovered stents in TIPS placement in a large cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 1995 to June 2012, a total of 744 consecutive adult patients underwent de novo TIPS placement (378 receiving uncovered stents, 366 receiving covered stents). Information was obtained on demographics, baseline clinical variables, and outcomes after TIPS placement. Data were collected, compared, and analyzed to assess outcomes including mortality, primary patency (determined via repeat intervention), and secondary patency (determined via ultrasound parameters).

RESULTS

Covered stents were associated with significantly improved primary patency (P < 0.001) and secondary patency (P < 0.001) when compared with uncovered stents in TIPS procedures. Additionally, covered stents were associated with higher estimated overall survival rates and higher survival rates when TIPS was performed emergently and in patients with higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. For example, in patients with MELD scores between 11 and 18, there was a predicted survival of 59.2% with covered stents versus 42.8% with uncovered stents at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that covered stents offer the additional value of higher estimated overall survival and higher estimated survival in patients undergoing TIPS emergently and in those with higher MELD scores when compared to uncovered stents.

An Algorithm for Management After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement According to Clinical Manifestations

We propose an algorithm for management after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement according to clinical manifestations. For patients with an initial good clinical response, surveillance Doppler ultrasound is recommended to detect stenosis or occlusion. A TIPS revision can be performed using basic or advanced techniques to treat stenosis or occlusion. In patients with an initial poor clinical response, a TIPS venogram with pressure measurements should be performed to assess shunt patency. The creation of a parallel TIPS may also be required if the patient is symptomatic and the portal pressure remains high after TIPS revision. Additional procedures may also be necessary, such as peritoneovenous shunt (Denver shunt) placement for refractory ascites, tunneled pleural catheter for hepatic hydrothorax, and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration procedure for gastric variceal bleeding. A TIPS reduction procedure can also be performed in patients with uncontrolled hepatic encephalopathy or hepatic failure.

No effect of albumin infusion on the prevention of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a major problem in patients submitted to TIPS. Previous studies identified low albumin as a factor associated to post-TIPS HE. In cirrhotics with diuretic-induced HE and hypovolemia, albumin infusion reduced plasma ammonia and improved HE. Our aim was to evaluate if the incidence of overt HE (grade II or more according to WH) and the modifications of venous blood ammonia and psychometric tests during the first month after TIPS can be prevented by albumin infusion. Twenty-three patients consecutively submitted to TIPS were enrolled and treated with 1 g/Kg BW of albumin for the first 2 days after TIPS followed by 0,5 g/Kg BW at day 4th and 7th and then once a week for 3 weeks. Forty-five patients included in a previous RCT (Riggio et al. 2010) followed with the same protocol and submitted to no pharmacological treatment for the prevention of HE, were used as historical controls. No differences in the incidence of overt HE were observed between the group of patients treated with albumin and historical controls during the first month (34 vs 31 %) or during the follow-up (39 vs 48 %). Two patients in the albumin group and three in historical controls needed the reduction of the stent diameter for persistent HE. Venous blood ammonia levels and psychometric tests were also similarly modified in the two groups. Survival was also similar. Albumin infusion has not a role in the prevention of post-TIPS HE.

Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND

The decreased portal blood flow and the potential decrease in arterial nutrient hepatic blood flow after creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) makes the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) challenging.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after TIPS in patients with HCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 1998 to 2009, 20 patients underwent selective (segmental or subsegmental) TACE for HCC after TIPS. Among 20 patients, seven patients had undergone one to three sessions of TACE for HCC before TIPS creation. TACE was performed using a mixture of iodized oil and cisplatin, and absorbable gelatin sponge particles. Tumor response, complications, and patient survival were evaluated after TACE.

RESULTS

After TACE, 14 of the 20 (70%) patients showed a tumor response, with only one (5%) experiencing a TACE-related major complication, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. None of the patients who underwent TACE after TIPS died within 30 days. During the follow-up period (range 2.2-107 months; mean 32.6 months), 18 patients died and two remained alive. The median survival period after TACE was 23 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor stage was the only independent prognostic factor for patient survival (P = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Selective TACE may be safe and effective for the palliative treatment of HCC in patients with TIPS. Late tumor stage ( ≥III) was poor prognostic factor for determining the patient survival period after post-TIPS TACE.

Uncovering the truth about covered stents: is there a difference between covered versus uncovered stents with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts?

INTRODUCTION

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stents purportedly provide superior patency. This study was undertaken to determine whether covered stents provide better long-term patency and outcomes after TIPSs.

METHODS

Patients with portal hypertension undergoing TIPS at a large teaching hospital from 2001 to 2010 were studied. Median data are presented.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-six patients underwent TIPS; 70 received uncovered stents, and 176 received covered stents. Patients who received uncovered stents had more severely impaired liver function (41% were Child class C cirrhotics). The follow-up was longer with uncovered stents (48 vs 24 months, P < .01). Reinterventions for stenosis were undertaken in 33% with uncovered stents versus 19% with covered stents (P = .01). Shunt dysfunction occurred in 57% with uncovered stents versus 21% covered (P = .05). A deterioration of hepatic function occurred in 31% with uncovered stents versus 30% with covered (P = .32). Survival with uncovered stents was 31 months versus 33 months with covered stents (P = .55, Kaplan-Meier).

CONCLUSIONS

Covered stents may improve patency but do not mitigate postshunt hepatic dysfunction and do not improve survival.

Should stent-grafts replace bare stents for primary transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts?

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation using bare stents is a second-line treatment for complications of portal hypertension due in part to the relatively high number of reinterventions and the occurrence of new or worsened encephalopathy. Initially, custom-made stent-grafts were used for TIPS revision in cases of biliary fistulae. Subsequently, custom stent-grafts were used for de novo TIPS creation. With the introduction of the VIATORR(®) TIPS endoprosthesis a dedicated stent-graft became available for TIPS creation and revision. The VIATORR(®) demonstrated its efficacy and superiority to uncovered stents in retrospective analyses, case-matched analyses, and randomized studies. The improved patency of stent-grafts has led many to requestion the role of TIPS as a second-line therapy. Currently, randomized trials are warranted to redefine the role of TIPS in the treatment of complications of portal hypertension.

Comprehensive review of TIPS technical complications and how to avoid them

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article is to describe potential technical complications related to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) placement and to discuss strategies to avoid and manage complications if they arise.

CONCLUSION

TIPS is an established interventional therapy for complications of portal hypertension. Although TIPS remains a relatively safe procedure, direct procedure-related morbidity rates are as high as 20%. The technical complexity of this intervention increases the risk for methodologic mishaps during all phases of TIPS placement, including venous access and imaging, transhepatic needle puncture, shunt insertion, and variceal embolization. Thus, interventional radiologists require a thorough stepwise understanding of TIPS insertion, possible adverse sequela, and technical tips and tricks to maximize the safety of this procedure.

Influence of the secondary deployment of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts on maintenance of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt patency

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of secondary deployment of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stent grafts in the treatment of dysfunctional transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSs) in comparison with other common approaches (conventional angioplasty or implantation of bare metal stents).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 121 dysfunctional bare metal TIPS presenting between 2000 and 2004 was conducted. The group was divided into four subgroups according to the type of intervention: conventional angioplasty (52 cases; 43%), bare metal stent deployment (35 cases; 28.9%), nondedicated ePTFE-covered stent-graft deployment (15 cases; 12.4%), and dedicated ePTFE-covered stent-graft deployment (19 cases; 15.7%). In all four groups, the primary patency after the specific intervention was calculated and mutually compared.

RESULTS

Primary patency rates after 12 and 24 months were 49.7% and 25.3%, respectively, in conventional angioplasty; 74.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with bare metal stents; 75.2% and 64.5%, respectively, with nondedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts; and 88.1% and 80.8%, respectively, with dedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of dysfunctional TIPS, better patency after the intervention was obtained by deploying dedicated ePTFE-covered stent grafts in comparison with conventional angioplasty, bare metal stents, and nondedicated ePTFE-covered stents.

Rebleeding rates following TIPS for variceal hemorrhage in the Viatorr era: TIPS alone versus TIPS with variceal embolization

PURPOSE

To compare rebleeding rates following treatment of variceal hemorrhage with TIPS alone versus TIPS with variceal embolization in the covered stent-graft era.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 52 patients (M:F 29:23, median age 52 years) with hepatic cirrhosis and variceal hemorrhage underwent TIPS insertion between 2003 and 2008. Median Child-Pugh and MELD scores were 8.5 and 13.5. Generally, 10-mm diameter TIPS were created using covered stent-grafts (Viatorr; W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ). A total of 37 patients underwent TIPS alone, while 15 patients underwent TIPS with variceal embolization. The rates of rebleeding and survival were compared.

RESULTS

All TIPS were technically successful. Median portosystemic pressure gradient reductions were 13 versus 11 mmHg in the embolization and non-embolization groups. There were no statistically significant differences in Child-Pugh and MELD score, or portosystemic pressure gradients between each group. A trend toward increased rebleeding was present in the non-embolization group, where 8/37 (21.6%) patients rebled while 1/15 (6.7%) patients in the TIPS with embolization group rebled (P = 0.159) during median follow-up periods of 199 and 252 days (P = 0.374). Rebleeding approached statistical significance among patients with acute hemorrhage, where 8/32 (25%) versus 0/14 (0%) rebled in the non-embolization and embolization groups (P = 0.055). A trend toward increased bleeding-related mortality was seen in the non-embolization group (P = 0.120).

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS alone showed a high incidence of rebleeding in this series, whereas TIPS with variceal embolization resulted in reduced recurrent hemorrhage. The efficacy of embolization during TIPS performed for variceal hemorrhage versus TIPS alone should be further compared with larger prospective randomized trials.

Clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created with covered stents with different diameters: results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The incidence of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE) could be reduced by using stents with a small diameter. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of HE and the clinical efficacy of TIPS created with 8- or 10-mm PTFE-covered stents.

METHODS

Consecutive cirrhotics submitted to TIPS for variceal bleeding or refractory ascites were randomized to receive a 8- or 10-mm covered stent. As recommended by our Ethical Committee, the trial was stopped after the inclusion of 45 patients.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable for age, sex, etiology, and psychometric performance. After TIPS, the portosystemic pressure gradient was significantly higher in the 8-mm stent group (8.9+/-2.7 versus 6.5+/-2.7 mmHg; p=0.007). Consequently, the probability of remaining free of complications due to portal hypertension was significantly higher in the 10-mm than in the 8-mm stent group: 82.9% versus 41.9% at one year; log-rank test, p=0.002. In particular, the persistence of ascites with the need for repeated paracentesis was significantly more frequent in the patients treated with 8-mm stent diameter for refractory ascites (log-rank test, p=0.008). The probability of remaining free of HE was similar in both groups. Cumulative survival rate was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 8-mm diameter stents for TIPS leads to a significantly less efficient control of complications of portal hypertension. HE remains an unsolved major problem after TIPS.

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

The creation of an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt via a transjugular approach (TIPS) is an interventional radiological procedure used to treat the complications of portal hypertension. TIPS insertion is principally indicated to prevent or arrest variceal bleeding when medical or endoscopic treatments fail, and in the management refractory ascites. This review discusses the development and execution of the technique, with focus on its clinical efficacy. Patient selection, imaging surveillance, revision techniques, and complications are also discussed.

Causes of TIPS dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation is an effective method to control portal hypertension. TIPS creations with bare stents have shown limited and unpredictable patency. In nearly all cases of rebleeding or recurrent ascites after TIPS creation, there is shunt stenosis or occlusion. The purpose of this article is to review the biologic and technical factors that predispose to TIPS failure and how the use of an expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered-stent has significantly improved TIPS patency.

CONCLUSION

Biologic and technical factors may predispose to shunt failure. The combination of improved technique and expandable PTFE has significantly improved TIPS patency. The need for follow-up venography and secondary interventions has been reduced significantly as a result of improved shunt patency.

TIPS: comparison of shunt patency and clinical outcomes between bare stents and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent-grafts

PURPOSE

To compare shunt patency and clinical outcomes in two groups of patients who received a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): one group with bare stents and one with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent-grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TIPS were created with bare stents (n = 41) or stent-grafts (n = 40). Overall TIPS patency rates were compared between these two groups, as were clinical outcomes in patients with variceal bleeding and those with ascites.

RESULTS

In the bare stent group, primary shunt patency rates were 63%, 48%, and 24% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Secondary patency rates were 75% and 62% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. In the stent-graft group, primary patency rates were 94%, 67%, and 38% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Secondary patency rates were 100% and 92% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. All stent patency rates were higher in the stent-graft group, but only the difference in the 3-month primary patency rate (63% vs 94%) reached significance (P = .03). In patients with variceal bleeding as well as those with ascites, early and overall clinical success rates were higher in the stent-graft group, but only the 3-month and 12-month differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS created with stent-grafts had better 3-month primary patency rates and better 3-month and 12-month clinical success rates compared with those created with bare stents.

Direct intrahepatic portocaval shunt through transhepatic puncture via retrohepatic inferior vena cava: applied anatomical study

BACKGROUND

DIPS is to create a portosystemic shunt directly between the portal vein and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (RIVC) without passing through the hepatic vein. It has been recommended that the DIPS could be applied when routine TIPS is unsuccessful or the patient has anatomical variations of the hepatic vein. The aim of this study was to identify the safe area of the RIVC where the DIPS can be safely established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The lengths of the safe and unsafe areas of the RIVC were measured. The tributaries of the RIVC were examined. The diameter of these tributaries was measured and their incidence and relation to the safe area of the RIVC were observed. The puncture distances of DIPS and TIPS were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The liver together with the RIVC was collected from 31 adult cadavers (age 32-65 years; M/F 25/6). 1. The safe and unsafe areas of the RIVC: the total length of the RIVC was 70.1 +/- 13.0 mm (33.1-92.0 mm), whereas the length of the safe area of the RIVC was 54.3 +/- 12.3 mm (20.2-71.1 mm), which was about over 70% of the total length. The length of the unsafe area at the upper end was 5.9 +/- 1.8 mm (3.0-10.2 mm), and at the lower end was 8.9 +/- 2.9 mm (3.1-20.0 mm). 2. The tributaries of the RIVC: In about 90% of the cadavers (90.3%; 28 out of 31), the LHV and MHV had the common trunk. The other three cadavers (9.7%; 3 out of 31) had independent RHV, MHV and LHV. There were 217 of small hepatic veins draining into the lower segment of the RIVC. Over 70% of the small hepatic veins were smaller than 5 mm in diameter and distributed on the anterior and left wall of the lower RIVC. 3. Puncture distances of the DIPS and TIPS: The distances from the bifurcation of the portal vein to the RIVC, to the right and to middle hepatic veins were 31.2 +/- 7.9 mm (15.0-47.2 mm), 38.6 +/- 8.1 mm (17.2-59.0 mm), and 46.6 +/- 8.2 mm (34.0-68.1 mm), respectively. Thus, the puncture distances via the RIVC, RHV and LHV were significantly different (P < 0.001). The puncture distance of the DIPS was shortest.

CONCLUSION

Anatomically, DIPS is a feasible interventional procedure to make a intrahepatic shunt between IVC and portal vein directly, and has its anatomical advantages compared to TIPS.

Incidence, natural history, and risk factors of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, natural history, and risk factors of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with the new polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent grafts in cirrhotic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight cirrhotic patients treated by TIPS with PTFE-covered stent grafts and followed by the same medical team--according to a prospective protocol for diagnostic workup and surveillance strategy--were reviewed. The follow-up was 19.9 +/- 20.6 months.

RESULTS

At least one episode of HE occurred in 35 of 78 (44.8%) patients. The probability of remaining free of HE was 53.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.4-66.2] at 1 yr and 50.9% at 2 yr (95% CI 38.2-63.8%). The total number of HE episodes was 89. Fifty-five percent of the episodes were grades III-IV. The occurrence of HE tended to be constant during the follow-up, probably because of the very low incidence of shunt dysfunction (13.6% at 2 yr). Moreover, in six patients, a refractory HE required the reduction of the shunt diameter. One patient died due to variceal bleeding after this procedure. At a multivariate analysis, an older age, high creatinine levels, and low serum sodium and low albumin values were shown to be independent factors for the occurrence of HE. Serum creatinine level was the only variable related to the development of refractory HE at the logistic multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

HE after TIPS with PTFE-covered stent grafts is frequent; its incidence is not confined to the first post-TIPS period, but it has the tendency to be frequent over time. Refractory HE occurred in 8% of patients and may be successfully managed by reducing the stent diameter. The selection of patients undergoing TIPS placement should be very accurate, especially for those subjects with abnormal creatinine level.

improved patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: the efficacy of cilostazol for the prevention of pseudointimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of oral administration of cilostazol to inhibit pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models.

METHODS

Successful TIPS creation was carried out in 11 of 12 healthy young pigs (20-25 kg). In the treatment group (n = 6), both cilostazol and aspirin were administered daily, from the first day of TIPS creation. The control group (n = 5) was administered only aspirin. The animals were followed-up for 2 weeks and then killed. The specimen (including portal vein, hepatic parenchymal tract, hepatic vein, and inferior vena cava) and stents were carefully bisected in a longitudinal fashion. The control group was compared with the treatment group by means of a gross and histologic evaluation of the degree of pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia in the shunt.

RESULTS

At the gross evaluation, the control group showed considerably more pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia than the treatment group. Using microscopic evaluation, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the mean maximum pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia thickness between the control group (2.97 +/- 0.33 mm) and treatment group (0.73 +/- 0.27 mm).

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of cilostazol may have been effective in reducing pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models.

Inhibition of pseudointimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models: the efficacy of local delivery of paclitaxel using a perforated balloon catheter

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit pseudointimal hyperplasia/intimal hyperplasia in swine transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) models TIPS were created in seven healthy domestic swine (15-20 kg). Before TIPS stent insertion, we performed a short-term infusion of paclitaxel (treatment group: n = 4) and saline (control group: n = 3) into the TIPS tract using a balloon catheter in which two 0.010 inch holes were created on opposite sides of the balloon. Paclitaxel or saline was given to all animals via the hepatic parenchymal and venous outflow tract. The animals were followed for up to two weeks and then killed. Gross and histological evaluations of the shunts were performed, and the maximum pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia thicknesses were calculated for each animal The average infusion time of paclitaxel or saline was 7.6 min (6-9 min). At gross and histological evaluation, considerable pseudointimal hyperplasia had formed in the control group and statistically significant differences were found upon microscopic evaluation in the maximum pseudointimal hyperplasia thickness between the control (2.41 mm, range 1.7-3.16 mm) and animals receiving paclitaxel (0.63 mm, range 0.42-0.98 mm, p<0.05) Local delivery of paclitaxel at the time of TIPS creation may have been effective in reducing pseudointimal/intimal hyperplasia in swine TIPS models.

TIPS para o controle das complicações da hipertensão portal: eficácia, fatores prognósticos associados e variações técnicas

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia do TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) para tratar as complicações clínicas em pacientes com hipertensão portal. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Quarenta e quatro pacientes, sendo 30 do sexo masculino e 14 do feminino e com idade média de 52 anos foram analisados. A indicação para realização de TIPS foi hemorragia gastrintestinal em 28 e ascite refratária em 16. Houve 7 pacientes Child-Pugh A, 24 Child-Pugh B e 11 Child-Pugh C. RESULTADOS: O TIPS foi realizado com sucesso em todos os pacientes (100%), verificando-se queda do gradiente pressórico porto-sistêmico médio de 49,69% (de 18,98 mmHg para 9,55 mmHg). Comprovou-se melhora clínica em 35 pacientes (79,55%). A mortalidade pós-operatóriaia foi de 13,64%, sendo mais incidente nos pacientes Child-Pugh C (45,45%). Os fatores mais relevantes de mau prognóstico foram o aumento da bilirrubina e do nível de creatinina. A sobrevida média de pacientes Child-Pugh A foi de 11,5 meses, nos Child-Pugh B foi de 10,97 meses e nos Child-Pugh C foi de apenas 5,9 meses. Foram observadas complicações em nove casos (20,44%). CONCLUSÃO: O TIPS é eficiente para reduzir a pressão portal. As complicações e a morbi-mortalidade relacionadas com o procedimento podem ser consideradas aceitáveis. A mortalidade foi influenciada por alguns fatores clínicos, tais como classe Child-Pugh C e elevação dos níveis séricos de bilirrubina e creatinina.

Interventional radiology in liver transplantation

Improvements in surgical technique, advances in the field of immunosuppresion and the early diagnosis and treatment of complications related to liver transplantation have all led to prolonged survival after liver transplantation. In particular, advances in diagnostic and interventional radiology have allowed the Interventional Radiologist, as part of the transplant team, to intervene early in patients presenting with complications related to organ transplant with resultant increase in graft and patient survival. Such interventions are often achieved using minimally invasive percutaneous endovascular techniques. Herein we present an overview of some of these diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in the treatment and management of patients before and after liver transplantation.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt: 11 years' experience at a regional referral centre

OBJECTIVES

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) is now widely used in the treatment of uncontrolled and recurrent variceal haemorrhage. This study reports the outcome and long-term follow-up of 125 patients who were referred to a single centre for TIPSS.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-five patients were referred to undergo TIPSS. All but 10 had variceal haemorrhage. The 10 patients referred with refractory ascites were excluded from the analysis. Our follow-up protocol was to assess shunt patency only if bleeding recurred or there was a clinical indication. The mean age was 51.5 years (range 18-87 years) and 64 patients (56%) were male. The commonest aetiology for chronic liver disease was alcohol (80%). At referral, 19 patients (16%) were Child-Pugh class A, 26 patients (23%) were Child-Pugh class B and 70 patients (61%) were Child-Pugh class C. The mean follow-up period was 20.4 months (range 0-95 months).

RESULTS

TIPSS was successfully placed in 108 of 115 patients (94%). The thirty-day mortality was 30%. One-year and 2-year overall cumulative survival was 52% (survival ratio, 0.525; 95% confidence interval, 0.432-0.619) and 43% (survival ratio, 0.436; 95% confidence interval, 0.340-0.532), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TIPSS is effective in the treatment of uncontrolled or recurrent variceal bleeding. In comparison with previously published studies, our study suggests no value in regular or routine shunt surveillance to reduce rebleeding episodes or mortality, but this needs to be further assessed in prospective randomized studies.

TIPS with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent: results of an Italian multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to describe the results of a multicenter prospective trial on the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) using the Viatorr stent-graft.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

From 2001 to 2003, 114 patients (75 men and 39 women; mean age, 59.3 years) with portal hypertension underwent TIPS with the Viatorr stent-graft. Indications for treatment were variceal bleeding (n = 49, 43.0%), refractory ascites (n = 52, 45.6%), hypertensive gastropathy (n = 10, 8.8%), Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 1, 0.9%), and hepatorenal syndrome (n = 2, 1.7%). Eight patients (7.0%) had Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis; 60 (52.6%), Child-Pugh class B; and 46 (40.4%), Child-Pugh class C. Patients were monitored by color Doppler sonography and phlebography.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 113 (99.1%) of 114 patients; in one patient, creation of the track was not feasible. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient decreased from 21.8 to 8.7 mm Hg. Three minor immediate complications (2.6%) occurred (two cases of self-limiting hemoperitoneum and one extrahepatic portal puncture requiring covered stenting). At a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, the overall mortality rate was 31.0% (35/113), with a 30-day mortality rate of 8.8% (10/113). Mortality was significantly higher in patients in Child-Pugh class C with refractory ascites and with post-procedural encephalopathy. Cumulative primary patency rates were 91.9%, 79.9%, and 75.9% at 6, 12, and 24 months' follow-up, respectively. Restenosis occurred in 15 patients (13.3%) within the stent (n = 8, 53.3%) or at the ends of the portal (n = 1, 6.7%) or hepatic (n = 6, 40%) veins and was solved by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 11), stenting (n = 3), or parallel TIPS (n = 1). The secondary patency rate was 98.2%. Post-procedural encephalopathy occurred in 27 patients (23.9%).

CONCLUSION

The Viatorr stent-graft is safe and effective in TIPS creation, with high primary patency rates. Covering the entire track up to the inferior vena cava can increase patency.

Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction in PTFE-covered stent-grafts versus bare stents

PURPOSE

The aim was to compare the clinical and hemodynamic outcome between polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated stent-grafts and bare stents in patients who required both elective and emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement due to portal hypertension related complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all seventy patients with portal hypertension related complications who required TIPS placement in a referral hospital from September 1998 to May 2002 was done. Follow-up was extended until May 2003. PTFE-covered stent-grafts were used in the latter 20. Demographic variables, cirrhosis etiology and Child-Pugh class, indication of TIPS placement and clinical outcome were recorded. The following TIPS-related outcomes were registered: recurrent variceal bleeding and/or ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and mortality.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, portacaval gradient (PCG) after TIPS placement and at 1 month angiographic revision were similar in both groups. At 6 month follow-up, PCG was significantly lower in patients with stent-grafts (14.2 mmHg (5.6 mmHg) versus 7 mmHg (1 mmHg), p<0.001). Overall, there were no cases of clinically relevant TIPS dysfunction in the coated stent group while 22% of patients in the bare stent group had recurrence of portal hypertension related complications (p=0.085). Actuarial probability of TIPS dysfunction in bare stents was 82% at 12 months compared to no episode in covered stent-grafts (p=0.03). Mean increase in total serum bilirubin was higher in the PTFE-coated stent group (6.7 mg/dl (14.4 mg/dl) versus 0.5 mg/dl (2.4 mg/dl), p=0.01) without differences in encephalopathy nor mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

One year shunt patency rate is improved with placement of ePTFE-covered stent-grafts without a higher rate of encephalopathy. Further prospective trials are required.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation with the Viatorr expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft

PURPOSE

To evaluate the midterm clinical results and patency of transjugular portosystemic shunts (TIPS) created with a commercially available expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stent-graft based on angiographic and ultrasonographic (US) criteria in a series of 71 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients (61 men, 10 women; mean age, 58.6 years, range, 25-78 years) were included in this series, which was performed in two centers. Indications for TIPS creation were refractory ascites (n = 44) and recurrent esophageal bleeding (n = 27). Ten patients had Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis, 43 had class B disease, and 18 had class C disease. Underlying liver diseases were alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 58), cirrhosis resulting from hepatitis (n = 9), cryptogenic cirrhosis (n = 3), and Budd-Chiari syndrome (n = 1). TIPS were created with commercially available ePTFE-covered stent-grafts in all patients. The diameters of the stent-grafts were 10 mm in 58 patients and 8 mm in the remaining 13 patients. Follow-up included clinical examination and color-coded US after 5 days, 1, 3, and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Shunt angiograms were obtained every 6 months. Median follow-up was 16.3 months (range, 3.8-26.6 months).

RESULTS

TIPS creation was successful in all patients without complications, and effective portal decompression was observed with a reduction of the mean portal gradient from 19 mm Hg to 6 mm Hg before and after TIPS creation. Four shunt occlusions were observed after 5 days, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months. Shunt stenosis was observed in three patients at the hepatic vein, which was not fully covered by the stent-graft, after 6 months (n = 2) and 12 months, and at the portal side after 1 month in a patient who initially had portal vein thrombosis. The repeat intervention rate was 11.3%. The primary patency rates were 87.4% (95% CI, 77.7%-97.1%) after 6 months and 80.8% (95% CI, 68.2%-93.4%) after 12 months. The rate of de novo or deteriorated hepatic encephalopathy was 31%. The recurrent bleeding rate was 3.7% (one of 27), and ascites improved or resolved in 64% of patients after 1 month.

CONCLUSION

TIPS patency can be significantly increased if the ePTFE-covered stent-graft is used for shunt creation. The increased shunt patency contributes to low repeat intervention and recurrent bleeding rates. The rate of hepatic encephalopathy is within the range of previously reported rates.

Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts for TIPS procedure: 1-year patency and clinical results

OBJECTIVES

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent grafts appear to have the potential to improve TIPS patency, but data available are few and controversial. The aim of this prospective nonrandomized trial was to assess TIPS safety and 1-yr patency with a new commercially available PTFE-covered stent graft in comparison with a group of historical controls treated with conventional stents.

METHODS

Between July 1992 and December 1999, 87 consecutive cirrhotics underwent TIPS with conventional stents, while from January 2000 to November 2001, 32 consecutive cirrhotics were treated with PTFE-covered stent grafts. All patients were followed by the same medical team according to a prospective protocol for a diagnostic work-up and a surveillance strategy.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable for age, sex, etiology, and severity of cirrhosis. The 1-yr probability of remaining free of shunt dysfunction tended to be higher in the covered stent group: 76.3% (95% CI = 58.7-93.9%) versus 57.5% (95% CI = 46.6-68.4%); log rank test: p = 0.055. However, stenoses inside the stent were significantly higher in patients with bare stents (88% vs 17%), while stenoses at the hepatic or portal vein were more frequent in PTFE-covered stent-graft group (50% vs 9% and 33% vs 3%, respectively), (chi2 = 15.42; df = 2.0; p = 0.0004). Stenoses inside the covered portion of the stent did not occur. One-year cumulative rebleeding, encephalopathy, and survival were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

PTFE-covered stents are able to solve pseudointimal hyperplasia within the stent tract, but have a high incidence of hepatic or portal vein stenosis. Improvements in stent design and insertion techniques are necessary to fully achieve the potential benefit of this new device.

Covered stents in transjugular portosystemic shunt: healing response to non-porous ePTFE covered stent grafts with and without intraluminal irradiation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the healing response to a new commercially available ePTFE-covered stent graft used to create transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in an animal model with and without intraluminal irradiation. The study was designed for ten domestic normotensive pigs. The TIPS was created using a ePTFE-covered stent graft (Viatorr, Gore, Flagstaff, Ariz.). Five animals were scheduled for intraluminal irradiation with iridium 192 immediately after TIPS creation with a dosage of 18 Gy. Shunt venograms were performed every 2 weeks. Animals from the irradiated and non-irradiated group were killed at 2-week intervals. Maximum follow-up was planned for 8 weeks in each group, with two animals in reserve. Gross specimen evaluation and histological examination, including scanning electron microscopy, was performed. Two animals died from interventional complications. In the irradiation group, one shunt occlusion and one stenosis occurred after 2 weeks. The stenosis regressed until the end of the 8-week follow-up period and probably was caused by a resolving thrombus. In the non-irradiated group, no shunt dysfunction was observed. One animal died early due to encephalopathy. Histology revealed an increased inflammatory reaction in the irradiation group, a lesser degree of incorporation of the stent graft, and a lesser degree of endothelialization of the inner surface compared with the non-irradiated group. No significant foreign body reaction was found at any time in any of the animals. The Viatorr stent graft was well tolerated in the pig model. Intraluminal irradiation seemed to have an adverse effect on the healing response. The TIPS patency was prolonged in both the irradiated and non-irradiated group compared with data from the literature; however, seemingly better results were observed in the non-irradiated group.

Using a dopamine type 1A receptor agonist in high-risk patients to ameliorate contrast-associated nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of fenoldopam mesylate, a dopamine type 1A receptor agonist and a potent renal vasodilator that markedly increases renal blood flow, on kidney function of patients who were receiving iodinated contrast material for an interventional procedure and thought to be at high risk of contrast-associated nephropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who received fenoldopam mesylate to determine the acute and, when possible, the longer term effects on kidney function.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine cases were reviewed. The average serum creatinine value before contrast administration was 2.55 mg/dL (range, 1.3-5.8 mg/dL) [corrected]. Twenty-four hours after contrast administration, serum creatinine was measured in 28 of the 29 patients. The serum creatinine values had decreased in 16 of the 28 patients by an average of 0.55 mg/dL [corrected]. In nine patients, the serum creatinine value had not changed. Two of the three increases in the serum creatinine value appear to have been caused primarily by problems that did not involve the contrast material.

CONCLUSION

The use of fenoldopam mesylate at appropriate doses offers patients at high risk for contrast-associated nephropathy a chance to avoid this complication. To learn the extent and true nature of the effect of fenoldopam mesylate in this patient population requires a rigorous scientific trial, which is currently underway.

CT portography by multidetector helical CT: comparison of three rendering models

PURPOSE

To assess the value of multidetector CT portography in visualizing varices and portosystemic collaterals in comparison with conventional portography, and to compare the visualizations obtained by three rendering models (volume rendering, VR; minimum intensity projection, MIP; and shaded surface display, SSD).

METHODS

A total of 46 patients with portal hypertension were examined by CT and conventional portography for evaluation of portosystemic collaterals. CT portography was performed by multidetector CT (MD-CT) scanner with a slice thickness of 2.5 mm and table feed of 7.5 mm. Three types of CT portographic models were generated and compared with transarterial portography.

RESULTS

Among the 46 patients, 48 collaterals were identified on CT transverse images, while 38 collaterals were detected on transarterial portography. Forty-four of 48 collaterals identified on CT transverse images were visualized with the MIP model, while 34 and 29 collaterals were visualized by the VR and SSD methods, respectively. The average CT value for the portal vein and varices was 198 HU with data acquisition of 50 sec after contrast material injection.

CONCLUSIONS

CT portography by multidetector CT provides excellent images in the visualization of portosystemic collaterals. The images of collaterals produced by MD-CT are superior to those of transarterial portography. Among the three rendering techniques, MIP provides the best visualization of portosystemic collaterals.

Creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts with stent-grafts: initial experiences with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered nitinol endoprosthesis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and performance of a recently developed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered nitinol stent-graft to create transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with portal hypertension and related complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ePTFE-covered nitinol stent-graft was used to create TIPS in 16 patients with recurrent variceal bleeding (n = 13) or refractory ascites (n = 3). Follow-up was performed with duplex ultrasonography, clinical assessment, and venography at 6 months. Technical success and portosystemic pressure gradients (PPGs) before and after stent-graft implantation and at follow-up were assessed. Two patients died during follow-up. Histopathologic follow-up data were available for one patient at autopsy and for the other after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

The implantation technical success rate was 100%. Mean (+/- SD) PPG was reduced from 24 mm Hg +/- 5 to 9 mm Hg +/- 2. Histopathologic analysis of the explanted endoprostheses revealed no inflammatory response or neointima formation. The venographic follow-up data available for 10 patients demonstrated 100% in-graft patency (mean follow-up, 289 days +/- 26). Revisions with implantation of a new ePTFE-covered nitinol stent-graft or another commercially available stent in 10 patients were necessary because of hepatic vein stenosis above the grafted portion and/or relative diameter mismatch causing TIPS dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The ePTFE-covered nitinol stent-graft was used successfully to create TIPS and has the potential to prolong TIPS patency upon complete coverage to the hepatocaval junction.

Transcaval TIPS in patients with failed revision of occluded previous TIPS

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of transcaval transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with occluded previous TIPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 1996 and December 2000 we performed five transcaval TIPS procedures in four patients with recurrent gastric cardiac variceal bleeding. All four had occluded TIPS, which was between the hepatic and portal vein. The interval between initial TIPS placement and revisional procedures with transcaval TIPS varied between three and 31 months; one patient underwent transcaval TIPS twice, with a 31-month interval. After revision of the occluded shunt failed, direct cavoportal puncture at the retrohepatic segment of the IVC was attempted.

RESULTS

Transcaval TIPS placement was technically successful in all cases. In three, tractography revealed slight leakage of contrast materials into hepatic subcapsular or subdiaphragmatic pericaval space. There was no evidence of propagation of extravasated contrast materials through the retroperitoneal space or spillage into the peritoneal space. After the tract was dilated by a bare stent, no patient experienced trans-stent bleeding and no serious procedure-related complications occurred. After successful shunt creation, variceal bleeding ceased in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Transcaval TIPS placement is an effective and safe alternative treatment in patients with occluded previous TIPS and no hepatic veins suitable for new TIPS.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: accuracy of helical CT angiography in the detection of shunt abnormalities

PURPOSE

To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of helical computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the detection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stenoses or occlusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients underwent 50 helical CT angiographic examinations and, within 2 weeks of each examination, portography with measurement of the portosystemic pressure gradient. Helical CT angiograms were independently interpreted by three radiologists who were blinded to the results of portography. Results of helical CT angiography and portography were compared. Sensitivity and specificity of helical CT angiography were separately calculated for the demonstration of morphologic abnormalities and the determination of their hemodynamic significance.

RESULTS

Of the 50 portograms, 31 (62%) demonstrated morphologic TIPS abnormalities, 24 (77%) with and seven (23%) without elevated portosystemic pressure gradients. Helical CT angiograms correctly demonstrated 30 (97%) of the 31 morphologic abnormalities and allowed correct diagnosis of 22 (92%) of the 24 hemodynamically significant abnormalities. Nineteen (38%) portograms were normal; helical CT angiograms correctly demonstrated the absence of abnormality in 17 (90%) of these cases. Sensitivity and specificity of helical CT angiography for all morphologic abnormalities were 97% and 89%, respectively, and, for hemodynamically significant abnormalities, 92% and 77%.

CONCLUSION

Helical CT angiography holds promise as a screening modality for the detection of TIPS stenoses or occlusions.

Improved patency of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in humans: creation and revision with PTFE stent-grafts

PURPOSE

To determine whether polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) stent-grafts yield longer patency for creation or revision of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen PTFE-covered Wallstents were placed in 13 patients with TIPS: seven at shunt creation and seven during revision of TIPS with one to five prior thromboses at 1 day to 1 year after initial TIPS formation. In six cases, prior to stent-graft placement persistent biliary-TIPS fistulas were demonstrated despite repeated shunt revisions with additional metallic stents.

RESULTS

All but one graft-lined TIPS were widely patent at a mean duration of venographic follow-up of 19 months (median, 17 months; range, 5-32 months). The limiting percentage of stenosis within the grafted shunts was 0%-10%. One patient developed stent-graft thrombosis; the prior biliary-TIPS fistula was seen despite the graft. A second, parallel PTFE-lined transcaval shunt was created in this patient; it was widely patent at 11-month follow-up. In two asymptomatic patients, stenoses developed in the short, nongrafted portions of the outflow hepatic veins.

CONCLUSION

PTFE stent-grafts can markedly prolong TIPS patency, potentially reducing the need for shunt follow-up and revision and the risk of recurrent symptoms associated with shunt stenosis or occlusion.

Helical CT angiography of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

Shunt dysfunction due to draining hepatic vein and/or stent stenosis is a common long-term complication of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS). Currently, Doppler sonography is the preferred modality for routine screening of TIPS for the detection of these complications. However, this method is time-consuming, highly operator-dependent, and difficult to perform because of the anatomic attributes of the cirrhotic liver. The use of helical CT angiography (HCTA) for imaging TIPS has been recently described. HCTA of TIPS is performed after a rapid i.v. injection of a bolus of low osmolality contrast medium, followed by helical data acquisition of the region of the shunt using thin sections. The data are then reprocessed a overlapping intervals and various reformations are obtained. Preliminary reports show the sensitivity and specificity of the helical CT angiography to be comparable with Doppler sonography.

Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures are increasingly being used, but the relationship between the hemodynamic effects of TIPS and the clinical events on follow-up remains undefined. Hence, we have investigated the hemodynamic correlations of portal hypertension-related events after a TIPS procedure.

METHODS

Prospective follow-up of 122 cirrhotic patients who had a TIPS procedure performed because of variceal hemorrhage was conducted.

RESULTS

The portacaval pressure gradient (PPG) significantly decreased after the TIPS procedure (from 19.7 +/- 4.6 to 8.6 +/- 2.7 mm Hg; P > 0.001), but increased thereafter and at rebleeding (n = 25) was > 12 mm Hg in all patients (18.4 +/- 4.6 mm Hg). Twenty-six patients developed ascites; the PPG (measured in 19) was always > 12 mm Hg. Increasing the PPG to > 12 mm Hg occurred very frequently (83% at 1 year). Within 1 year, 77% of patients underwent balloon angioplasty or restenting. However, 80% had again a PPG of > 12 mm Hg 1 year after reintervention. Hepatic encephalopathy developed in 31% of patients at 1 year; 21 of 23 patients had a PPG of < 12 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Total protection from the risk of recurrent complications of portal hypertension after a TIPS procedure requires that the PPG be decreased and maintained < 12 mm Hg. However, reintervention will be required in most patients within 1 year and again the second year. On the other hand, such portal decompression is associated with an increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) with balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents: technical and clinical aspects after 3 1/2 years' experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate prospectively our experience with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using four different metallic stents.

METHODS

Between November 1991 and April 1995, 57 patients (41 men and 16 women; age 35-72 years, mean 54 years) underwent the TIPS procedure. Techniques for portal vein localization before and during TIPS were fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT) studies, wedged hepatic venography, arterial portography, and ultrasound. After predilation we deployed balloon-expandable (n = 48) and self-expanding (n = 45) metallic stents. Fifteen patients underwent variceal embolization. Initial follow-up angiograms (mean 6.9 months, range 3-24 months) were obtained in 39 of these patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (93%) had successful TIPS placement. The mean decrease in portal pressure was 42.7%. Besides fluoroscopy, the most helpful techniques for portal vein localization were venography and CT. Residual stenosis (n = 1) and late shortening (n = 4) of Wallstents resulted in shunt dysfunction. The technical problems encountered with the Palmaz stent resulted from its lack of flexibility. We combined balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents in 12 patients. The 30-day and late follow-up (mean 11.9 months) percutaneous reintervention rates were 11.3% and 64.2%, respectively. There were no clinically significant complications related to the TIPS insertions.

CONCLUSION

An ideal stent does not exist for TIPS, and the authors recommend combining a Palmaz stent with a flexible self-expanding stent.

Is the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts limited in the management of patients with end-stage liver disease?

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are an established method for the treatment of the complications of portal hypertension. Recent reports have suggested that TIPS require frequent follow-up and may interfere with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed of ultrasound studies, angiographic studies, and complications of the first 100 patients treated consecutively with TIPS from February 1992 through October 1995.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients had functional TIPS. Thirty-one percent of patients treated emergently survived, significantly less than the 96% survival of elective patients. Fifty percent of the shunts were found to require angioplasty by 5 months. Seventeen patients treated with OLT did well, without intraoperative bleeding problems, and are alive.

CONCLUSIONS

The TIPS method treats successfully the complications of portal hypertension but requires careful follow-up. The technique may be used prior to OLT. For non-OLT candidates, the cost effectiveness of TIPS versus surgical shunting remains in question.