Appropriate imaging in children with skull fractures and suspicion of abuse

ACR Appropriateness Criteria head trauma--child

Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. CT is considered the first line of study for suspected intracranial injury because of its wide availability and rapid detection of acute hemorrhage. However, the majority of childhood head injuries occur without neurologic complications, and particular consideration should be given to the greater risks of ionizing radiation in young patients in the decision to use CT for those with mild head trauma. MRI can detect traumatic complications without radiation, but often requires sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment and exposes the patient to potential anesthesia risks. MRI may be helpful in patients with suspected nonaccidental trauma, with which axonal shear injury and ischemia are more common and documentation is critical, as well as in those whose clinical status is discordant with CT findings. Advanced techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging, may identify changes occult by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Traumatic hand fracture in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta

OBJECTIVE

This article presents a case of osteogenesis imperfecta and reviews the clinical and radiographic features of this condition.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 27-year-old woman presented with pain in her left hand after a fall while dancing. Plain films revealed multiple fractures in the digits of her left hand.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

The patient was referred to an orthopedic specialist for treatment.

CONCLUSION

Osteogenesis imperfecta is a heritable disorder of bone, which predisposes patients to fractures after trivial trauma, as was demonstrated in this case.

Association between linear skull fractures and intracranial hemorrhage in children with minor head trauma

BACKGROUND

To determine whether skull fractures can be used to associate intracranial hemorrhage with minor head trauma (MHT).

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a retrospective study evaluating the association between linear skull fractures and intracranial hemorrhage among children with MHT. Furthermore, we evaluated the significance of small intracranial hemorrhages by assessing the need for neurosurgical interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The case group included 114 children with a diagnosis of a linear skull fracture and the control group included 125 children without the diagnosis. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to estimate the odds ratio (OR) between linear skull fractures and intracranial bleeding.

RESULTS

Among the cases, 29 of 114 (25%) children were diagnosed with an intracranial hemorrhage on CT, compared to only 14 of 125 (11%) among the controls. The multivariable OR for intracranial hemorrhages comparing cases and controls adjusted for age and gender was 2.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 4.68). All the intracranial hemorrhages were small (3.8 +/- 2.3 mm) and none of them required any neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a linear skull fracture is an independent risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage. However, all the intracranial hemorrhages associated with the skull fractures were small and did not require any neurosurgical interventions.

Imaging of the central nervous system in suspected or alleged nonaccidental injury, including the mimics

Because of the widely acknowledged controversy in nonaccidental injury, the radiologist involved in such cases must be thoroughly familiar with the imaging, clinical, surgical, pathological, biomechanical, and forensic literature from all perspectives and with the principles of evidence-based medicine. Children with suspected nonaccidental injury versus accidental injury must not only receive protective evaluation but also require a timely and complete clinical and imaging workup to evaluate pattern of injury and timing issues and to consider the mimics of abuse. All imaging findings must be correlated with clinical findings (including current and past medical record) and with laboratory and pathological findings (eg, surgical, autopsy). The medical and imaging evidence, particularly when there is only central nervous system injury, cannot reliably diagnose intentional injury. Only the child protection investigation may provide the basis for inflicted injury in the context of supportive medical, imaging, biomechanical, or pathological findings.

Apparent life-threatening event or child abuse?

Children with apparent life-threatening events (ALTEs) often pose a diagnostic and management dilemma in a pediatric emergency department. Although the term ALTE is nonspecific and symptoms are vague, it may have alarming connotations and may signal serious life threatening conditions. It may be a subtle presentation of child abuse. We report an infant who was presented with an ALTE and subsequently determined to have subdural hematoma caused by nonaccidental injury.

Ethical issues in imaging nonaccidental injury: child abuse

One of the most controversial areas of nonaccidental injury is the medical diagnosis of inflicted central nervous system injury and its impact on medical, social, and legal outcomes for children and families. This review addresses the role of the neuroradiologist in the clinical care of the pediatric patient and as an expert medical witness in the area of nonaccidental injury.

Pediatric minor head trauma: indications for computed tomographic scanning revisited

BACKGROUND

Although the use of computed tomographic (CT) scanning in severe head trauma is an accepted practice, the indications for its use in minor injury remain ill defined and subjective. We sought to define the incidence and identify risk factors for intracranial injury (ICI) after minor head trauma in children who did not have suspicious neurologic symptoms in the field or on presentation.

METHODS

From January 1, 1992, until April 1, 2000, 569 blunt trauma patients (age < 16 years) with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or 15 triaged by American College of Surgeons Pediatric Mechanism Criteria at a Level I trauma center received head CT scan. Loss of consciousness (LOC) status was known for 429. This subgroup was retrospectively reviewed for mechanism, age, Injury Severity Score, LOC status, GCS score, associated injuries, and CT scan findings (normal, fracture only, or intracranial injury). Relative risk values for intracranial injury were generated and statistical significance was assessed.

RESULTS

Fourteen percent (62 of 429) of study patients (GCS score of 14 and 15) had ICI. Sixteen percent of patients (35 of 215) with GCS score of 15 and (-)LOC (negative for LOC) had intracranial injury manifesting as subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or brain contusion. Three required surgery for intracranial mass lesions. One patient deteriorated and required intubation and intensive care unit management. Neither (+)LOC (positive for LOC) nor GCS score of 14 increased the likelihood of intracranial injury over those patients without loss of consciousness or with GCS score of 15. Distant injury was also not an independent predictor of ICI for those with GCS scores of 14 or 15, as 84% of the ICI group had head injury only. Skull fracture was a risk factor for ICI but had poor negative predictive value, as 45% of patients with ICI did not have fractures. Similarly, minor craniofacial soft tissue trauma was a significant risk factor (relative risk, 11) that had marginal negative predictive value (0.95), as 14% (9 of 62) of ICI patients did not have superficial craniofacial injury.

CONCLUSION

A normal neurologic exam and maintenance of consciousness does not preclude significant rates of intracranial injury in pediatric trauma patients. Contrary to convention, neither LOC nor mild altered mentation is a sensitive indicator with which to select patients for CT scanning. Skull fractures and superficial craniofacial injury are similarly unreliable. Identification of these patients is important for the occasional case requiring intervention and for the tracking of complications. A liberal policy of CT scanning is warranted for pediatric patients with a high-risk mechanism of injury despite maintenance of normal neurologic status in the field and at hospital screening.