Uncommon Implantation Sites of Ectopic Pregnancy: Thinking beyond the Complex Adnexal Mass

Association between first-trimester ultrasound imaging of eccentric implantation and retained placenta

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate first-trimester ultrasound imaging of eccentric implantation in predicting the probability of retained placenta.

METHODS

A total of 61 cases with gestational sac eccentrically implanted in first-trimester ultrasound imaging was selected. Demographic and obstetric data were collected through data extraction of the electronic medical record at the time of delivery admission. Baseline characteristics (including age, gestational age of first-trimester ultrasound, size of gestational sac, gestational age of delivery), delivery outcomes (mode of delivery, retained placenta or placental fragments, blood loss, postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum ultrasound imaging) were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The risk difference for a woman with eccentric implantation to have a retained placenta was -0.18 (95% CI -0.28 to -0.08, p = 0.000) and the incidence of retained placenta in the study group was higher than in the control group (18% vs. 0%, p = 0.006). First-trimester ultrasound imaging of eccentric implantation was also found to be an independent risk factor for the incidence of inhomogeneous mass in postpartum ultrasound imaging (27.9% vs. 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.79, p = 0.012). Though 2 cases in the study group suffered postpartum hemorrhage, the risk difference for a woman with eccentric implantation to suffer postpartum hemorrhage was -0.03 (95% CI -0.08 to -0.01, not significant) and eccentric implantation did not increase postpartum hemorrhage rates (3.3% vs. 0%, not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

First-trimester ultrasound imaging of eccentric implantation was associated with an increased risk of retained placenta and inhomogeneous mass in postpartum ultrasound imaging.

Stone Babies: A Pictorial Essay With Insights From 25 Museal Lithopaedions

BACKGROUND

Lithopaedion, or "stone baby," represents an exceptionally rare clinical phenomenon with fewer than 350 documented cases existing in the medical literature. This condition arises when an advanced extrauterine pregnancy ceases its developmental trajectory and undergoes a lithification process, potentially resulting in a calcified mass with fetal-like morphology. Typically, lithopaedions remain asymptomatic for decades, but may occasionally elicit acute symptoms necessitating medical intervention. However, predominantly, these entities are incidental findings discovered during radiological examinations or autopsies.

RESULTS

In this article, we present a comprehensive overview of 25 lithopaedion cases, including unreported cases from several European medical museums. When feasible, additional radiological imaging was conducted to enhance diagnostic clarity. Furthermore, this article situates lithopaedions within a broader historical perspective and a detailed etiopathogenetic framework, elucidating the physiological and pathological mechanisms contributing to their formation. The phenomenon of lithopaedion is a testimony to the complex and often enigmatic nature of the human body.

CONCLUSIONS

By compiling and scrutinizing a substantial number of cases, this review offers valuable insights into the clinical implications of lithopaedions. Furthermore, it highlights the necessity for ongoing research and meticulous documentation of rare medical conditions like this, in order to contribute to a deeper understanding of extraordinary phenomena.

Diagnostic and management challenges of a rare case of caesarean scar pregnancy in a low-resource setting: a case report

Caesarean scar pregnancy is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy with the potential for catastrophic outcomes. A high index of suspicion is required for prompt diagnosis and intervention to improve outcomes. This report describes a rare case of Caesarean scar pregnancy, which was initially misdiagnosed as a threatened miscarriage and cervical ectopic pregnancy. A 35-year-old multiparous lady with two previous caesarean sections presented to the Gynaecology Unit of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH), Nigeria, at an estimated gestational age of 10 weeks, with recurrent vaginal bleeding of eight weeks' duration. She was referred to our facility from a private hospital, where she had first been managed as a case of threatened miscarriage and later as a cervical ectopic pregnancy. The transvaginal ultrasound in our facility was in keeping with a viable Caesarean scar pregnancy. The urine pregnancy test was positive, and the quantitative serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin was 75.6 mIU/ml. She had initial medical treatment with a combination of systemic multidose and intrauterine sac methotrexate and, subsequently, hysterotomy. Following systemic and local methotrexate, there was the demise of the foetus, which was evacuated at hysterotomy, and the uterine scar defect was repaired. She was discharged home in stable clinical condition one week after surgery. Her serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin dropped to 51.6 mIU/mL two weeks post-hysterotomy, and her urine pregnancy test became negative three weeks later. Though rare, caesarean scar pregnancy should be considered a differential diagnosis in reproductive-aged women with a previous caesarean section who present with vaginal bleeding in the first trimester.

The Impact of Adenomyosis on Pregnancy

Adenomyosis is characterized by ectopic proliferation of endometrial tissue within the myometrium. Histologically, this condition is marked by the presence of islands of benign endometrial glands surrounded by stromal cells. The myometrium appears thinner, and cross-sectional analysis often reveals signs of recent or chronic hemorrhage. The ectopic endometrial tissue may respond to ovarian hormonal stimulation, exhibiting proliferative or secretory changes during the menstrual cycle, potentially leading to bleeding, uterine swelling, and pain. Adenomyosis can appear as either a diffuse or focal condition. It is crucial to understand that adenomyosis involves the infiltration of the endometrium into the myometrium, rather than its displacement. The surgical management of adenomyosis is contingent upon its anatomical extent. The high incidence of the disease and the myths that develop around it increase the need to study its characteristics and its association with pregnancy and potential obstetric complications. These complications often require quick decisions, appropriate diagnosis, and proper counseling. Therefore, knowing the possible risks associated with adenomyosis is key to decision making. Pregnancy has a positive effect on adenomyosis and its painful symptoms. This improvement is not only due to the inhibition of ovulation, which inhibits the bleeding of adenomyotic tissue, but also to the metabolic, hormonal, immunological, and angiogenic changes associated with pregnancy. Adenomyosis affects pregnancy through disturbances of the endocrine system and the body's immune response at both local and systemic levels. It leads to bleeding from the adenomyotic tissue, molecular and functional abnormalities of the ectopic endometrium, abnormal placentation, and destruction of the adenomyotic tissue due to changes in the hormonal environment that characterizes pregnancy. Some of the obstetric complications that occur in women with adenomyosis in pregnancy include miscarriage, preterm delivery, placenta previa, low birth weight for gestational age, obstetric hemorrhage, and the need for cesarean section. These complications are an understudied field and remain unknown to the majority of obstetricians. These pathological conditions pose challenges to both the typical progression of pregnancy and the smooth conduct of labor in affected women. Further multicenter studies are imperative to validate the most suitable method for concluding labor following surgical intervention for adenomyosis.

Rectal ectopic pregnancy: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal pregnancy is an extremely rare form of ectopic gestation, and it presents with pelvic pain, severe bleeding, or remain asymptomatic. Its Risk factors include previous ectopic pregnancies, cesarean section, smoking, pelvic inflammatory disease, using intrauterine devices (IUD), and assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs). Accurate diagnosis of rectal ectopic pregnancy remains challenging due to the lack of well-established diagnostic criteria.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 25-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a 2-day history of unresponsive lower abdominal pain and nausea. Ultrasound imaging revealed a normal-sized uterus with endometrial thickness, fluids, and clots in the abdominal cavity, but no intrauterine gestational sac was detected. Based on the clinical presentation, ectopic pregnancy was suspected. During laparotomy, the placenta and fetal tissue remnants were found on the anterior wall of the upper third of the rectum.

DISCUSSION

Abdominal ectopic pregnancy is a high-risk condition that can manifest with gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, as well as abdominal and pelvic pain. These variable symptoms underscore the importance of considering rectal ectopic pregnancy as a differential diagnosis and ruling it out to prevent life-threatening complications, including severe bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Due to its rarity, diverse presentation, and similarity to other conditions, diagnosing rectal ectopic pregnancy and determining the appropriate management can be challenging. Physicians should be aware of this specific type of ectopic pregnancy to enable early-stage diagnosis and provide optimal care.

A rare case of fundal intramural ectopic pregnancy associated with previous B-Lynch sutures

BACKGROUND

Intramural ectopic pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy that occurs within the myometrium. It is challenging to diagnose it early because of its nonspecific clinical presentation, and there is no consensus or guideline on the optimal management among gynecologists.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 34-year-old woman who developed fundal intramural ectopic pregnancy after a previous caesarean section with B-Lynch suture. The B-Lynch suture was performed at 38 weeks of gestation for postpartum hemorrhage caused by refractory uterine atony about 8 years ago. Since then, the patient had oligomenorrhea. The diagnosis of intramural ectopic pregnancy was not confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound. An exploratory laparoscopy and hysteroscopy was performed to remove the gestational sac without significant bleeding. The surgery was successful and the patient recovered well. The patient was advised to monitor her β-HCG levels regularly until they returned to normal, and a follow-up pelvic ultrasound showed no complications. However, she has not been able to conceive or have an ectopic pregnancy so far.

CONCLUSIONS

This case illustrates the difficulty of diagnosing intramural ectopic pregnancy, especially when it is associated with previous uterine surgery and B-Lynch suture. It also demonstrates the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for treating complete IUP, especially when the gestational sac is located close to the uterine serosa. However, the risk of uterine rupture and hemorrhage should be considered, and the patient should be informed of the possible complications and alternatives. Gynecologists should be familiar with various management strategies and customize the treatment plan according to the patient's clinical situation and preferences.

Intramural ectopic pregnancy: An individual patient data systematic review

Intramural pregnancies (IMP) are very rare and represent about 1% of ectopic pregnancies (EPs). Despite a few reported cases, there is limited awareness & knowledge among sonographers and physicians. Moreover, no established diagnostic or treatment protocol exists for such a condition. This study identifies and synthesizes what is known about IMP, including etiology and pathophysiology, common clinical presentations, imaging features, laparoscopic and hysteroscopic findings, and management. PUBMED and Google Scholar were queried to identify eligible studies. All articles on IMP in human subjects available in English and French languages were included. Other types of ectopic pregnancies, including cesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies, were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and a narrative synthesis approach were used to systematically review the medical literature. 82 cases distributed around 27 countries with an average maternal age of 32.07 years and gestational age of 9.27 weeks were eventually selected for this study. History of curettage was the most common risk factor reported in 30 (36.58%) patients, followed by history of salpingectomy, assisted reproduction with embryo transfer, and previous cesarean delivery, in 10(12.19%), 10(12.19%), and 9(10.97%) patients respectively. Ultrasound was performed in 80(97.56%) cases. Of the 66 reported ultrasound findings, 29 were diagnostic or suggestive of IMP. MRI, laparoscopy (both diagnostic & surgical) and diagnostic hysteroscopy were carried out on 18(21.95%), 36(43.9%) and 22(26.83%) patients respectively. Histopathologic examination mainly performed after surgery was the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis. Management involved conservative (3.65%) approach, medical treatment with methotrexate or potassium chloride (23.17%), and surgical interventions. The latter includes laparoscopic surgery (25.61%), laparotomic surgery (23.17%), and hysterectomy (13.41%). IMP is a rare but potentially lethal clinical entity. A significant proportion of patients are asymptomatic and have no known risk factors. Correlation between clinical history and imaging findings is vital to establish a prompt diagnosis and reduce the risk of a catastrophic outcome.

Imaging of Acute Abdominopelvic Pain in Pregnancy and Puerperium-Part I: Obstetric (Non-Fetal) Complications

Acute abdominopelvic pain in pregnant and postpartum patients presents clinical and therapeutic challenges, often requiring quick and accurate imaging diagnosis. Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be a powerful diagnostic tool in the setting of acute abdominal pain during pregnancy and puerperium. MRI overcomes some drawbacks of US, avoiding the ionizing radiation exposure of a computed tomography (CT) scan. Although CT is not usually appropriate in pregnant patients, it is crucial in the emergency evaluation of postpartum complications. The aim of this article is to provide radiologists with a thorough familiarity with the common and uncommon pregnancy and puerperium abdominal emergencies by illustrating their imaging appearances. The present first section will review and discuss the imaging findings for acute abdominopelvic pain of obstetric (non-fetal) etiology.

Successful Ultrasound-Guided Methotrexate Intervention in the Treatment of Heterotopic Interstitial Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review

PURPOSE

This study aims to share the experience of minimally invasive ultrasound-guided methotrexate intervention in the treatment of heterotopic interstitial pregnancy (HIP) with good pregnancy outcomes, and to review the treatment, pregnancy outcomes, and impact on the future fertility of HIP patients.

METHODS

The paper describes the medical history, clinical manifestations, treatment history, and clinical prognosis of a 31-year-old woman with HIP, and reviews cases of HIP from 1992 to 2021 published in the PubMed database.

RESULTS

The patient was diagnosed with HIP by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) at 8 weeks after assisted reproductive technology. The interstitial gestational sac was inactivated by ultrasound-guided methotrexate injection. The intrauterine pregnancy was successfully delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. Twenty-five HIP cases in 24 studies published on PubMed from 1992 to 2021 were reviewed. Combined with our case, there were 26 cases in total. According to these studies, 84.6% (22/26) of these cases were conceived by in vitro fertilization embryo transfer, 57.7% (15/26) had tubal disorders, and 23.1% (6/26) had a history of ectopic pregnancy; 53.8% (14/26) of the patients presented with abdominal pain and 19.2% (5/26) had vaginal bleeding. All cases were confirmed by TVUS. In total, 76.9% (20/26) of intrauterine pregnancies had a good prognosis (surgery vs. ultrasound interventional therapy 1:1). All fetuses were born without abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis and treatment of HIP remain challenging. Diagnosis mainly relies on TVUS. Interventional ultrasound therapy and surgery are equally safe and effective. Early treatment of concomitant heterotopic pregnancy is associated with high survival of the intrauterine pregnancy.

Management of a uterine serosal heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization in a woman with bilateral salpingectomy: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is defined as the simultaneous presence of intrauterine pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy (EP). HP after bilateral salpingectomy is extremely rare and may lead to serious complications if it is misdiagnosed and untreated timely. Here, we presented the first reported case of uterine serosal HP in a woman after assisted reproductive technology with bilateral salpingectomy because of bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 27-years-old pregnant woman after in vitro fertilization with bilateral salpingectomy complained of a sudden onset of unprovoked abdominal pain, which was persistent and dull. She denied vaginal bleeding.

DIAGNOSES

Serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels are difficult to predict HP. Transvaginal ultrasonography demonstrated 1 gestational sac in the uterine cavity and 1 thick-walled cystic mass over the upper of the uterus, with a large amount of fluid in the Pouch of Douglas. Emergency laparotomy revealed a uterine serosal pregnancy combined with intrauterine pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

This patient was successfully managed via emergency laparotomy to remove residual tissue and repair the rupture of the uterine serosal pregnancy.

OUTCOMES

At postoperative 4 days, repeat transvaginal ultrosonography presented 1 intrauterine gestational sac with a visible fetal bud and cardiac tube pulsation. Now the patient recover well and is in an ongoing pregnancy.

LESSONS

It is noteworthy that HP/ectopic pregnancy is still not prevented after bilateral salpingectomy. In cases of multiple embryo transfer, even if intrauterine pregnancy has been established, it is important to rule out HP/ectopic pregnancy in time. Early diagnosis and early management can significantly improve clinical outcomes.

The Confounding Ultrasound Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy: Lessons From Peer Learning

ABSTRACT

As the treatment of ectopic pregnancy (EP) has shifted increasingly to medical therapies, the ultrasound (US) diagnosis of EP must necessarily favor specificity over sensitivity. Our review of peer learning cases of EP and early intrauterine pregnancies found several types of pitfalls and problems, which will be described in this essay. These issues include the following: differentiation of tubal EP from a corpus luteum by echogenicity relative to ovarian parenchyma, push technique, and claw sign; how to distinguish interstitial EP from eccentrically located intrauterine pregnancies (angular); use of trophoblastic flow in abnormal intrauterine locations to help identify cesarean scar or cervical implantations; recognition that hemoperitoneum without visualized EP may be due to EP or hemorrhagic cyst; and that distinguishing an abortion in progress from a pregnancy of unknown location may not always be possible and requires clinical follow-up. This essay will also illustrate the consensus terminology that our radiology department has developed in conjunction with our obstetrics and gynecology colleagues to communicate clear diagnoses and reduce the risk of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes.

Rectal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: A case report

RATIONALE

Rectal ectopic pregnancy is an extremely rare abdominal pregnancy. This article presents a female underwent an unsuccessful in vitro fertilization which was misdiagnosed by serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) test and transvaginal ultrasonography. Twenty days later, a ruptured rectal ectopic pregnancy was confirmed by laparoscopy then the gestational tissue removed successfully.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 32-year-old Chinese female was admitted to our hospital with complaining of symptoms, like gradual worsening of lower abdominal pain and dysuria. The abdominal ultrasonography revealed a sac-like mass in the posterior area to the uterus and a moderate amount of free fluid in the pelvic cavity. Forty days ago, she underwent a frozen embryo transfer. Twenty days ago, her serum β-hCG level was <5 mIU/mL and neither intrauterine nor ectopic pregnancy was detected by transvaginal ultrasonography. Then the procedure was thought to have resulted in biochemical pregnancy failure.

DIAGNOSIS

The primary rectal ectopic pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

The mass was removed laparoscopic surgery.

OUTCOMES

The patient recovered well.

LESSONS

When the history of in vitro fertilization combined with an inappropriate rise of serum β-hCG and no visible evidence of an intra-uterine pregnancy, physicians should consider the possibility of abdominal pregnancy. Early diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy can effectively save the life of the pregnant woman.

3D and cinematic rendering of abdominopelvic pathology in the peripartum period

3D with volume rendering and the more recently described technique of cinematic rendering are post-processing techniques that create reconstructions of cross sectional imaging data which enhance image interpretation. This review illustrates the potential applications of volume rendering, 3D, and cinematic rendering in the evaluation of abdominopelvic pathology in the peripartum period. These techniques show promise in improving visualization of pelvic structures, vascular mapping, highlighting textural differences between tissues, and improving understanding of spatial relationships.

The trend of the distribution of ectopic pregnancy sites and the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy

Background

Ectopic pregnancy is a life-threatening occurrence and is an important cause of pregnancy-related mortality. We launched the study to investigate the distribution and its variation trend of the ectopic pregnancy sites and the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy, to provide information for further clinical practice.

Methods

A total of 3915 patients were included in our study to calculate the distribution of the implantation sites of ectopic pregnancies. Then, we performed a χ² test for trend and calculated the quantity of each type of ectopic pregnancy during 2012–2015 and 2016–2019 to analyse the variation trend.

Results

(1) The proportion of each site of ectopic pregnancy was as follows: tubal pregnancy (84.70%), ovarian pregnancy (1.56%), caesarean scar pregnancy (8.63%), abdominal pregnancy (0.61%), cornual pregnancy (2.68%), cervical pregnancy (0.49%), heterotopic pregnancy (0.43%). (2) Through the χ² test for trend, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy showed an upward trend (P = 0.005). From 2012 to 2015 and 2016–2019, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy increased from 5.74 to 11.81% (P < 0.001). (3) A total of 72.78% (246/338) caesarean scar pregnancy patients had one caesarean delivery, 25.15% (85/338) had two caesarean deliveries, and 2.07% (7/338) had three caesarean deliveries. A total of 80.18% (271/338) had aborted before. The most common clinical manifestations were amenorrhea (98.52%), abdominal pain (25.74%) and vaginal bleeding (67.76%), the most common sign was uterine enlargement (46.75%).

Conclusion

As the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy increases, the caesarean delivery rate should be decreased to decrease the morbidity of caesarean scar pregnancy.

Ectopic pregnancy occurs when a fertilized ovum implants outside the endometrium of the uterine cavity, which is a life-threatening occurrence and is an important cause of pregnancy-related mortality. With the increase in pelvic and intrauterine operations, the distribution of ectopic sites has been changing, but the variation has been insufficiently studied. To investigate the distribution of ectopic sites and its variation trend in depth, we collected the data of 3915 ectopic pregnancy cases from the third affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University.

Through χ² test for trend, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy showed an upward trend (P = 0.005). From 2012 to 2015 and 2016–2019, the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy increased from 5.74 to 11.81% (P < 0.001). As the increasing of the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy to ectopic pregnancy, the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy was analysed.

A total of 72.78% (246/338) caesarean scar pregnancy patients had one caesarean delivery, 25.15% (85/338) had two caesarean deliveries, and 2.07% (7/338) had three caesarean deliveries. A total of 80.18% (271/338) had aborted before. The most common clinical manifestations were amenorrhea (98.52%), abdominal pain (25.74%) and vaginal bleeding (67.76%), the most common sign was uterine enlargement (46.75%).

As the ratio of caesarean scar pregnancy increases, the caesarean delivery rate should be decreased to decrease the morbidity of caesarean scar pregnancy.

Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Management

Background

Heterotopic pregnancies albeit rare are conceivably life-threatening if missed. With the development of assisted reproductive techniques, the incidence has increased. Confirmation of an intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) should not preclude the existence of a heterotopic pregnancy.

Case

A healthy 27-year-old patient (gravida 4, term 1, preterm 0, abortion 2, living 1) at approximately 5 weeks gestation through natural conception presented to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding. Pelvic ultrasound showed evidence of an IUP and a right adnexal mass, raising suspicion for a heterotopic pregnancy. The patient underwent an uncomplicated laparoscopic right salpingectomy. An IUP was confirmed on ultrasound postoperatively. The patient had an early pregnancy loss at 8 weeks of gestation.

Conclusion

With a high index of suspicion from clinical presentation and pelvic imaging, heterotopic pregnancy, while rare, should not be ruled out.

Ectopic lesions in the abdomen and pelvis: a multimodality pictorial review

Various ectopic lesions occur in the abdomen and pelvis and affect multiple organs including liver, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen, and organs of the genitourinary system. Ectopic organs may be present outside their normal positions, or ectopic tissues may develop while the original organ exists in its normal position. Both benign and malignant lesions can occur in ectopic organs and tissues. Owing to their unusual location, they can often be misdiagnosed as other lesions or even malignant lesions, such as metastasis or seeding. This multimodality pictorial review provides various cases of ectopic lesions in the abdomen and pelvis, which will help narrow the differential diagnosis and guide clinical decision-making.

Heterotopic cervical pregnancy: Case report and literature review

Cervical pregnancy (CP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy (EP) in which the embryo implants and grows inside the endocervical canal. Heterotopic cervical pregnancy is an even rare form of EP, in which at least two embryos are simultaneously implanted in different sites and only one in the uterine cavity. Although many treatment approaches are available, the ideal management remains unclear. Here, we describe two cases of CP caused by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). One case underwent fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for male factor infertility, and the other was frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) following conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF). Both cases were successfully treated with ultrasound‐guided cervical pregnancy aspiration, and intrauterine pregnancies were effectively protected. To the best of our knowledge, these two were rare case reports use aspiration without additional methods and intrauterine pregnancy achieved live birth.

The role of three-dimensional MRI in the differentiation between angular pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy

Background

In clinical practice it is an ongoing challenge to distinguish between angular pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy. With the three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being increasingly used, it is worth exploring its role in differentiating angular pregnancy from interstitial pregnancy. This study aims to investigate how 3D MRI can help reveal the differences between these two special pregnancies in the early diagnosis.

Methods

We reviewed and analyzed the 3D MRI images of 50 patients with interstitial pregnancy and 55 patients with angular pregnancy retrospectively. Imaging features were identified to compare these two special pregnancies, and the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic performance.

Results

The significant differences of the 3D MRI imaging features between interstitial pregnancy and angular pregnancy were found in the outline of uterus cavity (p < 0.001), involvement of junctional zone (p < 0.001), the signal of surroundings (p = 0.005), the relationship with round ligament (p = 0.042), and the overlying myometrial thickness (p = 0.041). Furthermore, the multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a series of significant indicators for angular pregnancy, including the junctional zone involvement, being-surrounded by hyper/iso-intensity on 3D images, and the asymmetric outline of uterus cavity. Combining these three imaging features, the AUC (Area under the Curve) of ROC curve was 0.87 in distinguishing interstitial pregnancy from angular pregnancy.

Conclusions

This study suggests that 3D MRI can help distinguish angular pregnancy from interstitial pregnancy in clinical practice, with the advantages that conventional MRI or ultrasound does not have. Through the significant image features, 3D MRI plays an important role in improving the timing of diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary interventions, and preventing hemorrhage in clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04470-z.

A diagnostic dilemma of an 18-week cervical ectopic pregnancy: A case report

Introduction

Cervical ectopic pregnancy (CEP) is characterised by the implantation of trophoblastic tissue within the cervical canal and is associated with a significant risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. This case report addresses a second-trimester CEP with unusual sonographic features suspicious of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), which was successfully managed with an abdominal hysterectomy.

Case Presentation

A 27-year-old woman, G6P2, presented to the labour ward of a rural hospital at 18 weeks of gestation with premature rupture of membranes. The index pregnancy was complicated by an absence of any antenatal care, as well as a history of cigarette smoking and cannabis use. An ultrasound scan demonstrated a live pregnancy with the foetal head within the cervical canal. A termination of pregnancy was arranged with misoprostol 200 mg orally followed by an oxytocin induction. However, a repeat ultrasound scan, after 12 h of oxytocin infusion, which failed to terminate the pregnancy, demonstrated a still live foetus as well as increased vascularity, concerning for PAS. The patient underwent an emergency abdominal hysterectomy, with an intraoperative diagnosis of a CEP. The postoperative course was unremarkable, and the patient was discharged home on day 3 post-operatively.

Discussion

Appropriate antenatal care and early booking-in would have identified a CEP early in gestation and allowed for minimally invasive management and potential conservation of fertility. When this is not possible in such cases, meticulous pre-operative planning by a gynaecologist with experience in advanced pelvic surgery can minimise the associated morbidity and mortality.

•

Cervical ectopic pregnancies are rare and at a late gestation can be difficult to diagnose

•

A multigravida woman at 18 weeks gestation presented in preterm labour with ultrasound concern for placenta accreta

•

Intraoperatively she was found to have a cervical ectopic pregnancy

•

An abdominal hysterectomy was required  in management

•

Early antenatal care is vital in diagnosis of cervical ectopic pregnancy and can potentially conserve fertility

Ectopic pregnancy: a resident's guide to imaging findings and diagnostic pitfalls

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a term used to describe any pregnancy which does not implant into the uterine cavity. There are several types of EPs: tubal, interstitial, ovarian, abdominal, heterotopic, cervical, and cesarean scar. Ectopic pregnancies can acutely rupture and are the number one cause of maternal death in the first trimester of pregnancy. Therefore, prompt recognition and accurate localization have significant clinical implications on patient outcome. Unfortunately, EPs have many mimickers, which can make the diagnosis challenging in certain cases. In this review, we aim to describe and illustrate sonographic findings of each type of EP, as well as present mimickers and various imaging pitfalls. We will clarify how to avoid potential misdiagnoses that could adversely affect patient outcomes. Lastly, we will briefly address management of each type of EP and discuss potential complications.

Imaging evaluation of uterine perforation and rupture

Uterine perforation and rupture, denoting iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic uterine wall injury, respectively, are associated with substantial morbidity,and at times mortality. Diverse conditions can result in injury to both the gravid and the non-gravid uterus, and imaging plays a central role in diagnosis of such suspected cases. Ultrasound (US) is the initial imaging modality of choice, depicting the secondary signs associated with uterine wall injury and occasionally revealing the site of perforation. Computed tomography can be selectively used to complement US findings, to provide a more comprehensive picture, and to investigate complications beyond the reach of US, such as bowel injury. In certain scenarios, magnetic resonance imaging can be an important problem-solving tool as well. Finally, catheter angiography is a valuable tool with both diagnostic and therapeutic capability, with potential for fertility preservation. In this manuscript, we will highlight the clinical and imaging approach to uterine perforation and rupture, while emphasizing the value of various imaging modalities in this context. In addition, we will review the multi-modality imaging features of uterine perforation and rupture and will address the role of the radiologist as a crucial member of the management team. Finally, a summary diagrammatic depiction of imaging approach to patients presenting with uterine perforation or rupture is provided.

Identifying the deceiver: the non-neoplastic mimickers of genital system neoplasms

Tumors of the genital system are common and imaging is of crucial importance for their detection and diagnosis. Several non-neoplastic diseases may mimic these tumors and differential diagnosis may be difficult in certain cases. Misdiagnosing non-neoplastic diseases as tumor may prompt unnecessary medical treatment or surgical interventions. In this article, we aimed to present the imaging characteristics of non-neoplastic diseases of the male and female genital systems that may mimic neoplastic processes. Increasing awareness of the imaging specialists to these entities may have a severe positive impact on the management of these patients.

Adenomyosis in Pregnancy: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls

Adenomyosis is a common benign uterine disorder in which ectopic endometrial glands extend into the myometrium. Adenomyosis is increasingly diagnosed in young women, affecting 20%-35% of women of reproductive age. Features of adenomyosis can be seen with either US or MRI, especially with newer imaging technology. With advances in reproductive endocrinology as well as a trend toward later maternal age, adenomyosis is increasingly noted during pregnancy, often while performing imaging for other reasons. Hormonal changes during pregnancy alter the appearance of adenomyosis, which includes diffuse, focal, and cystic adenomyosis. Recognizing these imaging changes in pregnancy proves essential for accurately diagnosing adenomyosis as a benign condition, as it mimics serious placental and myometrial abnormalities. Using a lower-frequency US transducer or MRI can be helpful in distinguishing among these entities. Describing the location of adenomyosis in relationship to the site of placentation is also important. Diagnosing adenomyosis is crucial because it can be associated with poor pregnancy outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, and fetal growth restriction. Adenomyosis is also a risk factor for preeclampsia. Intramural ectopic pregnancy is a rare but serious condition that can mimic cystic adenomyosis, and comparison with prepregnancy images can help differentiate the two conditions. The authors review the unique imaging characteristics of adenomyosis in pregnancy, focusing on accurate diagnosis of an underrecognized benign condition that can mimic myometrial and placental pathologic conditions.^©RSNA, 2021.

Heterotopic pregnancy: Simultaneous viable and nonviable pregnancies

Heterotopic pregnancy occurs when a patient has simultaneous intrauterine and ectopic pregnancies. Rates of heterotopic pregnancy have been rising with increased availability and access to in vitro fertilization and other advanced fertility technologies. Symptoms of heterotopic pregnancy are nonspecific, such as vague abdominal pain, so transvaginal ultrasound is a crucial part of the diagnostic process. Laparoscopy is the most commonly performed treatment of the ectopic pregnancy; other options include localized injections of methotrexate and/or potassium chloride. Following definitive termination of the ectopic pregnancy, many patients will successfully deliver the intrauterine pregnancy at term. Early identification of heterotopic pregnancy can reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.

The many faces of ectopic pregnancies: demystifying the common and less common entities

Ectopic pregnancy is a major cause of 1st trimester pregnancy deaths. It occurs in various locations in the abdominopelvic cavity. Ultrasonography is a first-line, rapid, and noninvasive modality for ectopic pregnancy evaluation. MRI can help clarify equivocal cases. When in doubt about the location, one should give an intrauterine pregnancy the benefit of the doubt with close ultrasound and hCG follow-up. Here, we will review the imaging findings and mimickers of ectopic pregnancies.

A rare case of ovarian ectopic pregnancy with IUD in situ: A case report from Nepal

High index of suspicion of ectopic (much likely ovarian) pregnancy should be considered if a woman with IUD in situ presents with abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and positive urine pregnancy test.

Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy: Case Report and Literature Review

Heterotopic pregnancy is defined as a condition when intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy occur simultaneously. It is a life-threatening condition that requires immediate and accurate diagnostics and treatment. We present a case of a 28-year-old primigravida female who conceived spontaneously and at her seventh week of gestation and was presented to the emergency department with weakness and acute pain in lower abdomen. Laboratory tests and transvaginal ultrasonography revealed the diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy. Urgent laparoscopic salpingotomy was chosen as a treatment option. The ectopic pregnancy was successfully removed with the preservation of the intrauterine embryo and fallopian tubes. The course of pregnancy after the surgery was without complications, and a healthy baby was delivered at the 39th week of gestation. When treated properly and on time, a heterotopic pregnancy can result in live childbirth with favorable outcomes for both the child and the mother.

Ultrasound in Early Pregnancy: Viability, Unknown Locations, and Ectopic Pregnancies

Ultrasound is essential in the evaluation and management of pregnancies of unknown location. Differential diagnoses include early pregnancy loss, pregnancy of unknown location, and ectopic pregnancies. Both transabdominal and transvaginal routes should be available, in addition to physical examination, for complete evaluation. Diagnostic criteria for early pregnancy loss have expanded in recent years to ensure false positive results do not lead to inappropriate evacuation of desired pregnancies.

Uterine-conserving approach in ruptured intramyometrial ectopic pregnancy

Intramyometrial ectopic pregnancy (IMEP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. It is defined as a conceptus implanted within the myometrium and is completely surrounded by myometrium with clear separation from both the uterine cavity and tubes. IMEP possesses not only diagnostic but also therapeutic challenge. The majority of reported cases were managed by hysterectomy. Early management of unruptured IMEP using methotrexate may help to preserve fertility. We, for the first time, report a case of ruptured IMEP managed successfully using suction and curettage followed by Bakri balloon tamponade and avoiding hysterectomy. Post-procedure, the patient received two doses of intramuscular methotrexate 50 mg/m2 due to plateauing serial beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels and subsequently achieved undetectable level 10 weeks post-methotrexate. She also had complete resolution of the ectopic intramyometrial mass.

Cervical pregnancy in assisted reproduction: an analysis of risk factors in 91,067 ongoing pregnancies

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the frequency of cervical pregnancy in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and what are the risk factors?

DESIGN

Case-control study of women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) at 25 private assisted reproduction clinics run by the same group in Spain. Two control groups (tubal ectopic pregnancies and intrauterine pregnancies) were established. The main outcome measure was frequency of cervical pregnancy. Demographic, clinical factors and IVF parameters were assessed for their influence on cervical pregnancy risk.

RESULTS

Thirty-two clinical pregnancies were achieved out of 91,067 ongoing pregnancies, yielding a rate of 3.5/10,000. Cervical pregnancies represented 2.02% of all ectopic pregnancies (32/1582). The main risk factors two or more previous pregnancies (OR 2.68; CI 1.18 to 6.07); two or more previous miscarriages (OR 4.21; CI1.7 to 10.43), one or more previous curettages (OR 3.99, CI 1.67 to 9.56), two or more previous curettages (OR 4.71; CI 1.19 to 18.66) and smoking (OR 2.82 CI 1.14 to 6.94). History of caesarean sections and tubal pregnancy was not associated with an elevated cervical pregnancy risk. Infertility conditions and endometrial thickness were similar across the three groups. The proportion of women from whom fewer than 10 oocytes were retrieved was higher in the clinical pregnancy group than in the IUP group.

CONCLUSIONS

In ART, the main risk factors for cervical ectopic pregnancy are a history of at least two pregnancies, miscarriages, at least one curettage and smoking. IVF parameters do not seem to influence the development of clinical pregnancies. Cervical pregnancies are less common in ART than previously reported, attributable to improvements in ART; a publication bias in early IVF reports cannot be ruled out.

Risk factors for cervical ectopic pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate risk factors for cervical ectopic pregnancies.

METHODS

Retrospective, quasi-experimental case-control study of cervical ectopic pregnancy (CEP) cases from 2000-2013. Two groups were selected as controls, patients with tubal ectopic (TEP) and intrauterine pregnancies (IUP) without a history of TEP, matched by year of pregnancy and randomly sampled in a 1:3 case-control ratio per each study group.

RESULTS

21 cases were identified and 126 controls included, 63 TEP and IUP each. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyze whether statistically significant preceding factors from a bivariate analysis could predict CEP. Compared to patients with IUP, CEP patients had a higher history of elective abortions, D&C and cervical excisional procedures, with a high effect size (>0.7). Compared to patients with TEP, CEP patients had a higher history of D&C and cervical excisional procedures, with a high effect size (>.7). The risk of CEP was significantly higher with a prior history of D&C compared to an IUP (aOR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-9.1; p=0.04) and a TEP (aOR 6.1; 95% CI, 1.8-21.2; p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

D&C is a strong risk factor for CEP when compared to pregnancies in other locations. These findings confirm previous associations described in case series.

Intramural ectopic pregnancy following pelvic adhesion: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Intramural pregnancy is an uncommon type of ectopic pregnancy, where the gestational sac is completely encircled by myometrium and unconnected with endometrial cavity, fallopian tubes or round ligament. Owing to its potentially life-threatening hemorrhage and uterine rupture, early diagnosis and management are urgently required. We present a case of a woman undergoing zigzag medical procedures, which featured non-consensus preoperative diagnosis of intramural and interstitial pregnancy and an intramural ectopic pregnancy ultimately confirmed and successfully removed by emergency laparoscopy. Additionally, we present a review of the related literature and discuss its varied clinical features, imageological characters, diagnosis, differential diagnosis and multiple treatments.

METHODS

A comprehensive bibliographic search through PubMed, using keywords: intramural ectopic pregnancy. Relevant literatures published from January 2013 to April 2019 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four cases in total for intramural ectopic pregnancy including this report were reviewed. Diagnoses were mainly made by ultrasound images. Most patients had a history of uterine surgery or intrauterine operation and had been surgically resected. None of the mothers were in danger, but only one case had live birth at 37 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSION

Non-specific clinical presentation and non-uniform ultrasound criteria pose a challenge for us to make timely and accurate management. Integrated radiological examinations and communication and cooperation between sonographers and gynecologists play a vital role in diagnostic accuracy and selecting the optimal therapeutic method of an intramural pregnancy.

Utility of MRI in Management of a Rare Case of Unilateral Dichorionic-Diamniotic Twin Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy

Twin tubal ectopic pregnancies are rare events but critical diagnoses to make in emergency settings. They are common in patients who received in vitro- fertilization and in those with history of PID. Unless 2 embryos are live with detectable heart beats, ultrasound cannot definitely diagnose twin tubal EP. In clinically stable patients, MRI may provide other concrete findings to establish the diagnosis and lead to better management. In literature, to best of our knowledge, there has been no reported case of twin tubal EP evaluated with MRI. In this article, we have briefly reviewed the role of MRI in different types of EP and its limitations. We report an interesting case of ruptured tubal twin EP diagnosed with MRI which was sub optimally evaluated with ultrasound.

Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy: A Rare Site of Implantation

BACKGROUND

Cervical ectopic pregnancies are rare, comprising < 1% of ectopic pregnancies, and life threatening if there is a delay in treatment or a misdiagnosis.

CASE REPORT

This case report describes a presentation of cervical ectopic pregnancy. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case report reviews nonsurgical and surgical treatment options for patients with cervical ectopic pregnancies.

Magnetic resonance imaging of common, uncommon, and rare implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To review the MRI appearances of tubal and non-tubal implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal ultrasound is the primary imaging modality in ectopic pregnancy and MRI is used as a problem-solving tool in selected indications as detailed in the article. MRI features of tubal, interstitial, cervical, cesarean scar, cornual, ovarian, abdominal, and heterotopic pregnancies are provided to familiarize the radiologists with their appearances thereby assisting them in making early and accurate diagnosis.

Intramural Ectopic Pregnancy Following Myomectomy

Intramural pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy with early diagnosis essential for prevention of severe hemorrhage and uterine rupture. We report a rare case of an intramural ectopic pregnancy at 12 weeks gestation in a woman 1 year post open myomectomy. Both transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were utilized as diagnostic aids in this case. The rare nature of this clinical scenario and lack of guidelines for management made clinical decision making difficult. Due to the size and location of the gestational sac, hysterectomy was deemed to be the safest modality, and a midline laparotomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, and bilateral salpingectomy was performed.

Treatment of an Ectopic Pregnancy: An Ethical Reanalysis

There is considerable lack of clarity on the medical facts surrounding management of ectopic pregnancy. In particular, it is not widely appreciated that by the time an ectopic pregnancy is diagnosed, in most cases, there is no viable fetus (i.e., the fetus has already died). Moreover, there is very little ethical guidance from the medical profession regarding the emotionally difficult decision to terminate a wanted pregnancy when the life of the mother is at risk. The best articulated positions on this topic come from religious groups, based on the principle of double effect. Yet the application of this reasoning to termination of an ectopic pregnancy is inconsistent with the medical facts in many cases. To resolve these inconsistencies, while still providing a robust ethical context for resolving such difficult situations, we propose clear guidelines for determining when a viable fetus is present in ectopic pregnancy and clarify the moral object in ectopic pregnancy management. Summary: This paper explores the ethical framework for clinical decision making in the case of ectopic pregnancies. Focusing on the disordered union of mother and unborn child clarifies the object and purpose of the actions used to separate the mother and fetus in order to save the life of both, or at least one. Since over 90% of tubal ectopic pregnancies present as embryos who have already died, these cases present no ethical dilemma. This paper proposes a modification of currently used criteria for determining the viability of ectopic pregnancies and calls for further research.

First-trimester emergencies: a radiologist's perspective

The purpose of this article is to help the practitioner ensure early diagnosis and response to emergencies in the first trimester by reviewing anatomy of the developing embryo, highlighting the sonographic appearance of common first-trimester emergencies, and discussing key management pathways for treating emergent cases. First-trimester fetal development is a stepwise process that can be challenging to evaluate in the emergency department (ED) setting. This is due, in part, to the complex anatomy of early pregnancy, subtlety of the sonographic findings, and the fact that fewer than half of patients with ectopic pregnancy present with the classic clinical findings of a positive pregnancy test, vaginal bleeding, pelvic pain, and tender adnexa. Ultrasound (US) has been the primary approach to diagnostic imaging of first-trimester emergencies, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) playing a supportive role in a small minority of cases. Familiarity with the sonographic findings diagnostic of and suspicious for early pregnancy failure, ectopic pregnancy, retained products of conception, gestational trophoblastic disease, failed intrauterine devices, and complications associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) is critical for any emergency radiologist. Evaluation of first-trimester emergencies is challenging, and knowledge of key imaging findings and familiarity with management pathways are needed to ensure early diagnosis and response.

Different Sonographic Faces of Ectopic Pregnancy

Vaginal bleeding in the first trimester has wide differential diagnoses, the most common being a normal early intrauterine pregnancy, with other potential causes including spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is approximately 2% of all reported pregnancies and is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide. Clinical signs and symptoms of ectopic pregnancy are often nonspecific. History of pelvic pain with bleeding and positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin should raise the possibility of ectopic pregnancy. Knowledge of the different locations of ectopic pregnancy is of utmost importance, in which ultrasound imaging plays a crucial role. This pictorial essay depicts sonographic findings and essential pitfalls in diagnosing ectopic pregnancy.