1
|
Dzaye O, Cornelis FH, Kunin HS, Sofocleous CT. Advancements and Future Outlook of PET/CT-Guided Interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 26:100916. [PMID: 38071029 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Advancements in minimally invasive technology, coupled with imaging breakthroughs, have empowered the field of interventional radiology to achieve unparalleled precision in image-guided diagnosis and treatment while simultaneously reducing periprocedural morbidity. Molecular imaging, which provides valuable physiological and metabolic information alongside anatomical localization, can expand the capabilities of image-guided interventions. Among various molecular imaging techniques, positron emission tomography (PET) stands out for its superior spatial resolution and ability to acquire quantitative data. PET has emerged as a crucial tool for oncologic imaging and plays a pivotal role in both staging and the assessment of treatment responses. Typically used in combination with computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) and occasionally with magnetic resonance imaging MRI (PET/MRI), PET as a hybrid imaging approach offers enhanced insights into disease progression and response. In recent years, PET has also found its way into image-guided interventions, especially within the rapidly expanding field of interventional oncology. This review aims to explore the current and evolving role of metabolic imaging, specifically PET, in interventional oncology. By delving into the unique advantages and applications of PET in guiding oncological interventions and assessing response, we seek to highlight the increasing significance of this modality in the realm of interventional radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Dzaye
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Molecular Imaging & Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Francois H Cornelis
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Henry S Kunin
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta P, Kalra N, Chaluvashetty SB, Gamangatti S, Mukund A, Abdul R, Shyam VS, Baijal SS, Mohan C. Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Guidelines on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2022; 32:540-554. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies and a significant cause of cancer-related death. Treatment of HCC depends on the stage of the tumor. As many patients with HCC are not deemed fit for surgical resection or liver transplantation, locoregional therapies play an essential role in the management. Image-guided locoregional treatments include percutaneous ablative therapies and endovascular therapies. The choice of an individual or a combination of therapies is guided by the tumor and patient characteristics. As the outcomes of image-guided locoregional treatments depend on the ability to achieve necrosis of the entire tumor along with a safety margin around it, it is mandatory to follow standard guidelines. In this manuscript, we discuss in detail the various aspects of image-guided locoregional therapies to guide interventional radiologists involved in the care of patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pankaj Gupta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Naveen Kalra
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sreedhara B. Chaluvashetty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Amar Mukund
- Department of Interventional Radiology, ILBS, New Delhi, India
| | - Razik Abdul
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - VS Shyam
- Department of Interventional Radiology, ILBS, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Chander Mohan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, BLK Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Three-dimensional modeling in complex liver surgery and liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21:318-324. [PMID: 35701284 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Liver resection and transplantation are the most effective therapies for many hepatobiliary tumors and diseases. However, these surgical procedures are challenging due to the anatomic complexity and many anatomical variations of the vascular and biliary structures. Three-dimensional (3D) printing models can clearly locate and describe blood vessels, bile ducts and tumors, calculate both liver and residual liver volumes, and finally predict the functional status of the liver after resection surgery. The 3D printing models may be particularly helpful in the preoperative evaluation and surgical planning of especially complex liver resection and transplantation, allowing to possibly increase resectability rates and reduce postoperative complications. With the continuous developments of imaging techniques, such models are expected to become widely applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bajaj G, Sundaram K, Jambhekar K, Ram R. Imaging After Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Emphasis on LIRADS Treatment Response Assessment Criteria. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2021; 42:318-331. [PMID: 34130846 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiologists play an essential role in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response and help guide further clinical management of patients. Interpretation of treatment response after locoregional therapy is challenging. The post-treatment imaging findings vary and depend on the type of treatment, the degree of treatment response, time interval after treatment and several other factors. Given the widespread use of local-regional therapies, understanding the appearance of treated lesions has become crucial to allow for a more accurate interpretation of post-treatment imaging. Several response criteria including the recently introduced Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) are currently used to assess treatment response. This review article describes the imaging assessment of HCC treatment response after several locoregional therapies using various response assessment criteria, emphasizing the LI-RADS treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gitanjali Bajaj
- Associate professor of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
| | - Karthik Sundaram
- Assistant Professor of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kedar Jambhekar
- Professor of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, AR
| | - Roopa Ram
- Associate professor of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brasse D, Burckel H, Marchand P, Rousseau M, Ouadi A, Vanstalle M, Finck C, Laquerriere P, Boisson F. Comparison of the [ 18F]-FDG and [ 18F]-FLT PET Tracers in the Evaluation of the Preclinical Proton Therapy Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:724-732. [PMID: 33847900 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01602-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main objective of the present study was to compare the 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]-FDG) and 3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine ([18F]-FLT) PET imaging biomarkers for the longitudinal follow-up of small animal proton therapy studies in the context of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PROCEDURES SK-HEP-1 cells were injected into NMRI nude mice to mimic human HCC. The behavior of [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FLT tumor uptake was evaluated after proton therapy procedures. The proton single-fraction doses were 5, 10, and 20 Gy, with a dose rate of 10 Gy/min. The experimental protocol consisted of 8 groups of 10 mice, each group experiencing a particular dose/radiotracer condition. A reference PET exam was performed on each mouse the day before the irradiation procedure, followed by PET exams every 3 days up to 16 days after irradiation. RESULTS [18F]-FDG uptake showed a linear dose-dependent increase in the first days after treatment (37%, p < 0.05), while [18F]-FLT uptake decreased in a dose-dependent manner (e.g., 21% for 5 Gy compared to 10 Gy, p = 1.1e-2). At the later time point, [18F]-FDG normalized activity showed an 85% decrease (p < 0.01) for both 10 and 20 Gy doses and no variation for 5 Gy. Conversely, a significant 61% (p = 0.002) increase was observed for [18F]-FLT normalized activity at 5 Gy and no variation for higher doses. CONCLUSION We showed that the use of the [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FLT radiolabeled molecules can provide useful and complementary information for longitudinal follow-up of small animal proton therapy studies in the context of HCC. [18F]-FDG PET imaging enables a treatment monitoring several days/weeks postirradiation. On the other hand, [18F]-FLT could represent a good candidate to monitor the treatment few days postirradiation, in the context of hypo-fractioned and close irradiation planning. This opens new perspectives in terms of treatment efficacy verification depending on the irradiation scheme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Brasse
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Hélène Burckel
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), UNICANCER, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiobiology Laboratory, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrice Marchand
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marc Rousseau
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ali Ouadi
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marie Vanstalle
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Christian Finck
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Frédéric Boisson
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bogoni M, Cerci JJ, Cornelis FH, Nanni C, Tabacchi E, SchÖder H, Shyn PB, Sofocleous CT, Solomon SB, Kirov AS. Practice and prospects for PET/CT guided interventions. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2021; 65:20-31. [PMID: 33494585 PMCID: PMC10446123 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.21.03291-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
During the past 10 years, performing real-time molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with computed tomography (CT) during interventional procedures has undergone rapid development. Keeping in mind the interest of the nuclear medicine readers, an update is provided of the current workflows using real-time PET/CT in percutaneous biopsies and tumor ablations. The clinical utility of PET/CT guided biopsies in cancer patients with lung, liver, lymphoma, and bone tumors are reviewed. Several technological developments, including the introduction of new PET tracers and robotic arms as well as opportunities provided through acquiring radioactive biopsy specimens are briefly reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Cristina Nanni
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elena Tabacchi
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Heiko SchÖder
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul B Shyn
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Assen S Kirov
- Unit of Molecular Imaging and Therapy Physics, Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kambadakone AR, Fung A, Gupta RT, Hope TA, Fowler KJ, Lyshchik A, Ganesan K, Yaghmai V, Guimaraes AR, Sahani DV, Miller FH. LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:56-74. [PMID: 28940042 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1325-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Accurate detection and characterization of liver observations to enable HCC diagnosis and staging using LI-RADS requires a technically adequate imaging exam. To help achieve this objective, LI-RADS has proposed technical requirements for CT, MR, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver. This article reviews the technical requirements for liver imaging, including the description of minimum acceptable technical standards, such as the scanner hardware requirements, recommended dynamic imaging phases, and common technical challenges of liver imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avinash R Kambadakone
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Alice Fung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Karthik Ganesan
- Department of Radiology, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Vahid Yaghmai
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander R Guimaraes
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Frank H Miller
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamie QM, Kobe AR, Mietzsch L, Manhart M, Puippe GD, Pfammatter T, Guggenberger R. Prototype metal artefact reduction algorithm in flat panel computed tomography - evaluation in patients undergoing transarterial hepatic radioembolisation. Eur Radiol 2017; 28:265-273. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4946-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
Although molecular imaging has had a dramatic impact on diagnostic imaging, it has only recently begun to be integrated into interventional procedures. Its significant impact is attributed to its ability to provide noninvasive, physiologic information that supplements conventional morphologic imaging. The four major interventional opportunities for molecular imaging are, first, to provide guidance to localize a target; second, to provide tissue analysis to confirm that the target has been reached; third, to provide in-room, posttherapy assessment; and fourth, to deliver targeted therapeutics. With improved understanding and application of(18)F-FDG, as well as the addition of new molecular probes beyond(18)F-FDG, the future holds significant promise for the expansion of molecular imaging into the realm of interventional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Francois Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and Department of Radiology, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|