RadioGraphics Update: Contrast-enhanced US Approach to the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Masses

Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Current Role in Adults and Children for Various Indications

Intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a rapidly evolving imaging technique that uses a microbubble contrast agent to enhance ultrasonographic images by augmenting characterization of blood vessels and organ perfusion. CEUS is considered as a useful problem-solving tool and as an indicated first-line imaging modality in select settings. CEUS technique has an inherent advantage over its predecessor B-mode and Doppler imaging. This article reviews different approved and off-label use of CEUS in the pediatric and adult population and also discusses Food and Drug Administration-approved contrast agents in the United States, their reported side effects, and ongoing efforts in the field.

Synoptic Reporting of Focal Liver Masses in at Risk Patients: Algorithmic Diagnosis and CEUS LI-RADS

OBJECTIVES

Reporting contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for focal liver masses in at risk patients is a challenging task. Traditionally used prose reporting (PR) is inconsistent and lacks standardization. We propose synoptic reporting (SR), encompassing algorithmic interpretation and liver imaging and reporting data system (LI-RADS) categorization.

METHODS

A software worksheet from Kailo Medical (Melbourne, AU), incorporates the CEUS algorithm for liver interpretation and CEUS LI-RADS categorization. Part 1. Feasibility of SR: twenty participants of varying experience were presented a brief lecture on SR, algorithmic approach to liver mass interpretation, and CEUS LI-RADS categorization. Ten representative liver masses were shown as unknown cases. Participants inputted data into SR worksheets. Results and LI-RADS category were generated solely by SR. Data were categorized as "correct" or "incorrect." Part 2. Prospective Analysis: Ninety-one patients for SR and 56 for PR, all were tested for completeness, efficiency, and user satisfaction.

RESULTS

Part 1: Junior participants, pass rate 81.6%, and senior participants, pass rate 83.3% showed no difference in performance. Part 2: Completeness: SR 98.4% and PR 87.0%. Efficiency: Average total time to completion: SR 11 minutes and PR 20 minutes. User satisfaction: Ultrasound technologists, all referring physicians, and six out of seven radiologists preferred SR over PR. Major benefits cited were total time saved, consistency and accuracy in documentation, and report completeness.

CONCLUSIONS

SR is a reliable and useful tool in clinical practice to report liver masses on ultrasound and assign an appropriate LI-RADS categorization and management pathway. This ultimately improves communication with referring clinicians and leads to better patient outcomes.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Findings in Patients with Rare Solitary Necrotic Nodule of the Liver - a Multicenter Report

PURPOSE

 This multicenter retrospective study highlights the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings in a series of histologically proven solitary necrotic nodules (SNN) of the liver, a poorly understood pathologic entity of uncertain origin that mimics malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 22 patients (M/F 13/9; mean age 59.4 years, SD ± 10.7, range 35-81) with histological diagnosis of SNN and CEUS were selected from clinical, imaging, and pathological archives of 7 US interventional centers, each of which provided 1 to 6 cases (mean 2.8). Pathological diagnosis was made on 20 US-guided biopsies and 2 surgical specimens. 2 patients had 2 SNNs with identical CEUS findings so that imaging analysis was carried out on 24 nodules.

RESULTS

 SNN was an incidental finding in healthy people in 10 cases (45.5 %), and it was discovered during follow-up for either known extrahepatic malignancies (9 cases = 41 %) or chronic liver disease (3 cases = 13.5 %). SNNs had a mean size of 19.3 mm (SD ± 6.5, range 9-40). On B-mode US, SNNs appeared hypoechoic in 14 cases (66.7 %), "target-like" in 7 cases (29.2 %), and homogeneously hyperechoic in 1 case (4.1 %). On CEUS, all lesions appeared devoid of contrast enhancement ("punched out" aspect) in the arterial, portal venous, and late phases after US contrast agent injection. A uniformly thin, hyperenhancing ring in the early arterial phase and isoenhanced with the surrounding parenchyma in the portal venous and late phases was found in 10 nodules (41.6 %). Clinical and imaging follow-up (mean duration 42.2 months, SD ± 34.9, range 2-108) was available in 15 patients with 16 SNNs: no changes in size and echostructure were seen.

CONCLUSION

 CEUS can contribute to the diagnosis of SNN when a "punched out" appearance in all vascular phases with or without thin rim enhancement in the very early arterial phase is present in healthy subjects in whom a focal liver lesion is incidentally found. In patients with a history of chronic liver disease or malignancy, US-guided biopsy represents the unavoidable first-line diagnostic modality.

Incidental Liver Lesions in children: A practical and evidence-based approach

Incidental liver lesions are increasingly being discovered in the context of the increased use of ultrasound studies and the majority are benign. In children, although individually rare, the differential diagnosis is broad and therefore a systematic approach is of utmost importance to reduce the radiological and disease burden in children and their families. This review article collected current evidence and provides fundamental information for the clinician regarding specific differential diagnoses and unique imaging features of benign liver lesions in children. Ultimately, we propose a practical stepwise approach mainly involving clinical and radiological workup. Laboratory tests and histopathological examination may be necessary in the presence of red flags or in indeterminate lesions.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Screening and Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a safe and noninvasive imaging technique that can characterize and evaluate liver lesions, and has been approved for this use in the Unites States since 2016. CEUS has been shown to be similar in accuracy to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and offers several advantages in certain patient populations who have contraindications for CT or MRI. However, CEUS has inherent limitations and has not been widely employed for evaluation of HCC. Methods: We present three retrospective cases of liver lesions in patients with cirrhosis, who underwent screening for HCC using concurrent, well-timed CT and CEUS. Results: In these cases, the liver lesions were better visualized and then diagnosed as malignancy via CEUS, whereas the lesions were best appreciated on CT only in retrospect. Conclusions: In some cirrhotic patients, a focal lesion may be more easily identifiable via CEUS than on CT and thus accurately characterized, suggesting an important and complementary role of CEUS with CT or MRI. Further studies are indicated to support the use of CEUS for the diagnosis and characterization of liver lesions in screening patients at risk for developing HCC.