How to Use LI-RADS to Report Liver CT and MRI Observations

MR Elastography for Classification of Focal Liver Lesions Using Viscoelastic Parameters: A Pilot Study Based on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Activations

BACKGROUND

Intrinsic activation MR elastography (iMRE) uses cardiovascular pulsations to assess tissue viscoelastic properties. Applying it to focal liver lesions extends its capabilities.

PURPOSE

To assess the viscoelastic parameters of focal liver lesions measured by iMRE and compare its diagnostic performance with extrinsic MRE (eMRE) for differentiating malignant and benign lesions.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

A total of 55 participants underwent MRI with research MRE sequences; 32 participants with 17 malignant and 15 benign lesions underwent both iMRE and eMRE. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: iMRE at ~1 Hz heart rate used a 3 T scanner with a modified four-dimensional (4D)-quantitative flow gradient-echo phase contrast and low-velocity encoding cardiac-triggered technique. eMRE employed a gradient-echo sequence at 30, 40, and 60 Hz.

ASSESSMENT

Liver displacements were measured using 4D-phase contrast and reconstructed via a nonlinear inversion algorithm to determine shear stiffness (SS) and damping ratio (DR). iMRE parameters were normalized to the corresponding values from the spleen. Lesions were manually segmented, and image quality was reviewed.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Dunn's test, and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were assessed.

RESULTS

SS was significantly higher in malignant than benign lesions with iMRE at 1 Hz (3.69 ± 1.31 vs. 1.63 ± 0.45) and eMRE at 30 Hz (3.76 ± 1.12 vs. 2.60 ± 1.26 kPa), 40 Hz (3.76 ± 1.12 vs. 2.60 ± 1.26 kPa), and 60 Hz (7.32 ± 2.87 vs. 2.48 ± 1.12 kPa). DR was also significantly higher in malignant than benign lesions at 40 Hz (0.36 ± 0.11 vs. 0.21 ± 0.01) and 60 Hz (0.89 ± 0.86 vs. 0.22 ± 0.09). The AUC were 0.86 for iMRE SS, 0.87-0.98 for eMRE SS, 0.47 for iMRE DR, and 0.62-0.86 for eMRE DR.

DATA CONCLUSION

Cardiac-activated iMRE can characterize liver lesions and differentiate malignant from benign lesions through normalized SS maps.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Lessons learned: strategies for implementing and the ongoing use of LI-RADS in your practice

The establishment of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in 2011 provided a comprehensive approach to standardized imaging, interpretation, and reporting of liver observations in patients diagnosed with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Each set of algorithms provides criteria pertinent to the various components of HCC management including surveillance, diagnosis, staging, and treatment response supported by a detailed lexicon of terms applicable to a wide range of liver imaging scenarios. Before its widespread adoption, the variability in the terminology of diagnostic criteria and definitions of imaging features led to significant challenges in patient management and made it difficult to replicate findings or apply them consistently. The integration of LI-RADS into the clinical setting has enhanced the efficiency and clarity of communication between radiologists, referring providers, and patients by employing a uniform language that averts miscommunications. LI-RADS has been strengthened with its integration into the American Association for Study of Liver Diseases practice guidelines. We will provide the background on the initial development of LI-RADS and reasons for development to serve as a starting point for conveying the system's benefits and evolution over the years. We will also suggest strategies for the implementation and maintenance of a LI-RADS program will be discussed.

CT/MRI technical pitfalls for diagnosis and treatment response assessment using LI-RADS and how to optimize

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer, is a significant global health burden. Accurate imaging is crucial for diagnosis and treatment response assessment, often eliminating the need for biopsy. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes the interpretation and reporting of liver imaging for diagnosis and treatment response assessment, categorizing observations using defined categories that are based on the probability of malignancy or post-treatment tumor viability. Optimized imaging protocols are essential for accurate visualization and characterization of liver findings by LI-RADS. Common technical pitfalls, such as suboptimal postcontrast phase timing, and MRI-specific challenges like subtraction misregistration artifacts, can significantly reduce image quality and diagnostic accuracy. The use of hepatobiliary contrast agents introduces additional challenges including arterial phase degradation and suboptimal uptake in advanced cirrhosis. This review provides radiologists with comprehensive insights into the technical aspects of liver imaging for LI-RADS. We discuss common pitfalls encountered in routine clinical practice and offer practical solutions to optimize imaging techniques. We also highlight technical advances in liver imaging, including multi-arterial MR acquisition and compressed sensing. By understanding and addressing these technical aspects, radiologists can improve accuracy and confidence in the diagnosis and treatment response assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Benign and malignant focal liver lesions displaying rim arterial phase hyperenhancement on CT and MRI

Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement is an imaging feature commonly encountered on contrast-enhanced CT and MRI in focal liver lesions. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement is a subtype of arterial phase hyperenhancement mainly present at the periphery of lesions on the arterial phase. It is caused by a relative arterialization of the periphery compared with the center of the lesion and needs to be differentiated from other patterns of peripheral enhancement, including the peripheral discontinuous nodular enhancement and the corona enhancement. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may be a typical or an atypical imaging presentation of many benign and malignant focal liver lesions, challenging the radiologists during imaging interpretation. Benign focal liver lesions that may show rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may have a vascular, infectious, or inflammatory origin. Malignant focal liver lesions displaying rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may have a vascular, hepatocellular, biliary, lymphoid, or secondary origin. The differences in imaging characteristics on contrast-enhanced CT may be subtle, and a multiparametric approach on MRI may be helpful to narrow the list of differentials. This article aims to review the broad spectrum of focal liver lesions that may show rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, using an approach based on the benign and malignant nature of lesions and their histologic origin. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may be an imaging feature encountered in benign and malignant focal liver lesions and the diagnostic algorithm approach provided in this educational review may guide toward the final diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Several focal liver lesions may demonstrate rim arterial phase hyperenhancement. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may occur in vascular, inflammatory, and neoplastic lesions. Rim arterial phase hyperenhancement may challenge radiologists during image interpretation.

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: diagnostic value of MRI features in differentiating pathologic subclassifications-type 1 versus type 2

OBJECTIVES

To identify MRI features for differentiating type 2 from type 1 intraductal papillary neoplasms of bile duct (IPNB) and assessing malignant potential of IPNB.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 60 patients with surgically proven IPNB who had undergone preoperative MRI between January 2007 and December 2020. All surgical specimens were reviewed retrospectively to classify types 1 and 2 IPNBs and assess tumor grade. Significant MRI features for differentiating type 2 (n = 40) from type 1 IPNB (n = 20); and for IPNB with an associated invasive carcinoma (n = 43) from intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 17) were determined using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

An associated invasive carcinoma was more frequently found in type 2 than in type 1 IPNB (85.0% [34/40] vs. 45.0% [9/20], p = 0.003). At univariable analysis, MRI features including extrahepatic location, no dilatation of tumor-bearing segment of bile duct, isolated upstream bile duct dilatation, and single lesion were associated with type 2 IPNB (all p ≤ 0.012). At multivariable analysis, significant MRI findings for differentiating type 2 from type 1 IPNB were extrahepatic location and no dilatation of tumor-bearing segment of bile duct (odds ratio [OR], 7.24 and 46.40, respectively). At univariable and multivariable analysis, tumor size ≥ 2.5 cm (OR, 8.45), bile duct wall thickening (OR, 4.82), and irregular polypoid or nodular tumor shape (OR, 6.44) were significant MRI features for differentiating IPNB with an associated invasive carcinoma from IPNB with intraepithelial neoplasia.

CONCLUSION

MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography may be helpful in differentiating type 2 IPNB from type 1 IPNB and assessing malignant potential of IPNB.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Preoperative MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography may be helpful in differentiating type 2 intraductal papillary neoplasms of bile duct (IPNB) from type 1 IPNB and assessing malignant potential of IPNB.

KEY POINTS

• In terms of tumor grade, the incidence of invasive carcinoma was significantly higher in type 2 intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) than in type 1 IPNB. • At MRI, extrahepatic location and no dilatation of tumor-bearing segment are significant features for differentiating type 2 IPNBs from type 1 IPNBs. • At MRI, large tumor size, bile duct wall thickening, and irregular polypoid or nodular tumor shape are significant features for differentiating IPNB with an associated invasive carcinoma from IPNB with intraepithelial neoplasia.

Should Hypervascular Incidentalomas Detected on Per-Interventional Cone Beam Computed Tomography during Intra-Arterial Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Impact the Treatment Plan in Patients Waiting for Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines do not indicate any comprehensive management of hepatic hypervascular incidentalomas (HVIs) discovered in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients during intra-arterial therapies (IATs). This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of HVIs detected on per-interventional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during IAT for HCC in patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective single-institutional study, all liver-transplanted HCC patients between January 2014 and December 2018 who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization (TARE) before LT were included. The number of ≥10 mm HCCs diagnosed on contrast-enhanced pre-interventional imaging (PII) was compared with that detected on per-interventional CBCT with a nonparametric Wilcoxon test. The correlation between the presence of an HVI and histopathological criteria associated with poor prognosis (HPP) on liver explants was investigated using the chi-square test. Tumor recurrence (TR) and TR-related mortality were investigated using the chi-square test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), TR-related survival (TRRS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the presence of HVI using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Among 63 included patients (average age: 59 ± 7 years, H/F = 50/13), 36 presented HVIs on per-interventional CBCT. The overall nodule detection rate of per-interventional CBCT was superior to that of PII (median at 3 [Q1:2, Q3:5] vs. 2 [Q1:1, Q3:3], respectively, p < 0.001). No significant correlation was shown between the presence of HVI and HPP (p = 0.34), TR (p = 0.095), and TR-related mortality (0.22). Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a significant impact of the presence of HVI on RFS (p = 0.07), TRRS (0.48), or OS (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

These results may indicate that the treatment plan during IAT should not be impacted or modified in response to HVI detection.

A Post-International Gastrointestinal Cancers' Conference (IGICC) Position Statements

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent liver tumor, is usually linked with chronic liver diseases, particularly cirrhosis. As per the 2020 statistics, this cancer ranks 6th in the list of most common cancers worldwide and is the third primary source of cancer-related deaths. Asia holds the record for the highest occurrence of HCC. HCC is found three times more frequently in men than in women. The primary risk factors for HCC include chronic viral infections, excessive alcohol intake, steatotic liver disease conditions, as well as genetic and family predispositions. Roughly 40-50% of patients are identified in the late stages of the disease. Recently, there have been significant advancements in the treatment methods for advanced HCC. The selection of treatment for HCC hinges on the stage of the disease and the patient's medical status. Factors such as pre-existing liver conditions, etiology, portal hypertension, and portal vein thrombosis need critical evaluation, monitoring, and appropriate treatment. Depending on the patient and the characteristics of the disease, liver resection, ablation, or transplantation may be deemed potentially curative. For inoperable lesions, arterially directed therapy might be an option, or systemic treatment might be deemed more suitable. In specific cases, the recommendation might extend to external beam radiation therapy. For all individuals, a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach should be adopted when considering HCC treatment options. The main treatment strategies for advanced HCC patients are typically combination treatments such as immunotherapy and anti-VEGFR inhibitor, or a combination of immunotherapy and immunotherapy where appropriate, as a first-line treatment. Furthermore, some TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be used as single agents in cases where patients are not fit for the combination therapies. As second-line treatments, some treatment agents have been reported and can be considered.

Quantification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Vascular Dynamics With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for LI-RADS Implementation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe a comprehensive contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging protocol and analysis method to implement CEUS LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) in a quantifiable manner. The methods that are validated with a prospective single-center study aim to simplify CEUS LI-RADS evaluation, remove observer bias, and potentially improve the sensitivity of CEUS LI-RADS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective single-center study enrolled patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (April 2021-June 2022; N = 31; mean age ± SD, 67 ± 6 years; 24 men/7 women). For each patient, at least 2 CEUS loops spanning over 5 minutes were collected for different lesion scan planes using an articulated arm to hold the transducer. Automatic respiratory gating and motion compensation algorithms removed errors due to breathing motion. The long axis of the lesion was measured in the contrast and fundamental images to capture nodule size. Parametric processing of time-intensity curve analysis on linearized data provided quantifiable information of the wash-in and washout dynamics via rise time ( RT ) and degree of washout ( DW ) parameters extracted from the time-intensity curve, respectively. A Welch t test was performed between lesion and parenchyma RT for each lesion to confirm statistically significant differences. P values for bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals of the relative degree of washout ( rDW ), ratio of DW between the lesion and surrounding parenchyma, were computed to quantify lesion washout. Coefficient of variation (COV) of RT , DW , and rDW was calculated for each patient between injections for both the lesion and surrounding parenchyma to gauge reproducibility of these metrics. Spearman rank correlation tests were performed among size, RT , DW , and rDW values to evaluate statistical dependence between the variables.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD lesion diameter was 23 ± 8 mm. The RT for all lesions, capturing arterial phase hyperenhancement, was shorter than that of surrounding liver parenchyma ( P < 0.05). All lesions also demonstrated significant ( P < 0.05) but variable levels of washout at both 2-minute and 5-minute time points, quantified in rDW . The COV of RT for the lesion and surrounding parenchyma were both 11%, and the COV of DW and rDW at 2 and 5 minutes ranged from 22% to 31%. Statistically significant relationships between lesion and parenchyma RT and between lesion RT and lesion DW at the 2- and 5-minute time points were found ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The imaging protocol and analysis method presented provide robust, quantitative metrics that describe the dynamic vascular patterns of LI-RADS 5 lesions classified as hepatocellular carcinomas. The RT of the bolus transit quantifies the arterial phase hyperenhancement, and the DW and rDW parameters quantify the washout from linearized CEUS intensity data. This unique methodology is able to implement the CEUS-LIRADS scheme in a quantifiable manner for the first time and remove its existing issues of currently being qualitative and suffering from subjective evaluations.

Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using Sonazoid: a comprehensive review

Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a promising technique for the detection and diagnosis of focal liver lesions, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, a collaborative effort between the Korean Society of Radiology and Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology resulted in the publication of guidelines for diagnosing HCC using Sonazoid CEUS. These guidelines propose specific criteria for identifying HCC based on the imaging characteristics observed during Sonazoid CEUS. The suggested diagnostic criteria include nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement, and the presence of late and mild washout, or Kupffer phase washout under the premise that the early or marked washout should not occur during the portal venous phase. These criteria aim to improve the accuracy of HCC diagnosis using Sonazoid CEUS. This review offers a comprehensive overview of Sonazoid CEUS in the context of HCC diagnosis. It covers the fundamental principles of Sonazoid CEUS and its clinical applications, and introduces the recently published guidelines. By providing a summary of this emerging technique, this review contributes to a better understanding of the potential role of Sonazoid CEUS for diagnosing HCC.

Optional MRI sequences for LI-RADS: why, what, and how?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver worldwide. Noninvasive diagnosis of HCC is possible based on imaging features, without the need for tissue diagnosis. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT/MRI diagnostic algorithm allows for standardized radiological interpretation and reporting of imaging studies for patients at high risk for HCC. Diagnostic categories of LR-1 to LR-5 designate each liver observation to reflect the probability of overall malignancy, HCC, or benignity based on imaging features, where LR-5 category has > 95% probability of HCC. Optimal imaging protocol and scanning technique as described by the technical recommendations for LI-RADS are essential for the depiction of features to accurately characterize liver observations. The LI-RADS MRI technical guidelines recommend the minimum required sequences of T1-weighted out-of-phase and in-phase Imaging, T2-weighted Imaging, and multiphase T1-weighted Imaging. Additional sequences, including diffusion-weighted imaging, subtraction imaging, and the hepatobiliary phase when using gadobenate dimeglumine as contrast, improve diagnostic confidence, but are not required by the guidelines. These optional sequences can help differentiate true lesions from pseudolesions, detect additional observations, identify parenchymal observations when other sequences are suboptimal, and improve observations conspicuity. This manuscript reviews the optional sequences, the advantages they offer, and discusses technical optimization of these sequences to obtain the highest image quality and to avoid common artifacts.

A Narrative Review on LI-RADS Algorithm in Liver Tumors: Prospects and Pitfalls

Liver cancer is the sixth most detected tumor and the third leading cause of tumor death worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy with specific risk factors and a targeted population. Imaging plays a major role in the management of HCC from screening to post-therapy follow-up. In order to optimize the diagnostic-therapeutic management and using a universal report, which allows more effective communication among the multidisciplinary team, several classification systems have been proposed over time, and LI-RADS is the most utilized. Currently, LI-RADS comprises four algorithms addressing screening and surveillance, diagnosis on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diagnosis on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and treatment response on CT/MRI. The algorithm allows guiding the radiologist through a stepwise process of assigning a category to a liver observation, recognizing both major and ancillary features. This process allows for characterizing liver lesions and assessing treatment. In this review, we highlighted both major and ancillary features that could define HCC. The distinctive dynamic vascular pattern of arterial hyperenhancement followed by washout in the portal-venous phase is the key hallmark of HCC, with a specificity value close to 100%. However, the sensitivity value of these combined criteria is inadequate. Recent evidence has proven that liver-specific contrast could be an important tool not only in increasing sensitivity but also in diagnosis as a major criterion. Although LI-RADS emerges as an essential instrument to support the management of liver tumors, still many improvements are needed to overcome the current limitations. In particular, features that may clearly distinguish HCC from cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and combined HCC-CCA lesions and the assessment after locoregional radiation-based therapy are still fields of research.