1
|
Yu Y, Guo Y, Zhu J, Shen R, Tang J. Chemotherapy drug combinations induced maternal ovarian damage and long-term effect on fetal reproductive system in mice. Eur J Pharm Sci 2024:106860. [PMID: 39043317 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
With the postponement of female reproductive age and the higher incidence of cancer in young people, fertility preservation has become increasingly important in childbearing age. Chemotherapy during pregnancy is crucial for maternal cancer treatments and fetal outcomes. It is a need to further study ovarian damage caused by chemotherapy drug combinations and long-term effects on offspring development, and a detailed understanding of side effects of chemotherapy drugs. In this study, chemotherapy drug combinations significantly impacted on ovarian function, especially epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) combination led to an unbalance in the development of the left and right ovary. Exposure to EC and cisplatin/paclitaxel (TP) increased the number of progenitor follicles while decreased the count of antral follicles and corpora luteum. As to the estrus cycle, EC exposure resulted in a longer estrus period and diestrus period, while TP exposure only extended the diestrus period. EC and TP affected steroid biosynthesis by reducing the expression of SF1 and P450arom.γ-H2AX was detected in both EC and TP exposure groups. As to the impact on the offspring from 4T1 tumor-bearing pregnant mice injected with EC, no significant difference was observed in the physical and neurological development compared to the control, but the ovarian weights, estrus cycles of the offspring were significantly different. Chemotherapy drug combinations exhibit ovarian toxicity, not only causing direct damage on the follicle cells but also disrupting steroid biosynthesis. The reproductive system of offspring from maternal tumor-bearing mice exposed to chemotherapy drugs was observed disorder, but the concrete mechanism still needs further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yu
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Yang Guo
- Shanghai Laboratory Animal Research Center, 3577 Road, Pudong District, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Jialei Zhu
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Ruling Shen
- Shanghai Laboratory Animal Research Center, 3577 Road, Pudong District, Shanghai 201203, China.
| | - Jing Tang
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pelczar P, Kosteczko P, Wieczorek E, Kwieciński M, Kozłowska A, Gil-Kulik P. Melanoma in Pregnancy-Diagnosis, Treatment, and Consequences for Fetal Development and the Maintenance of Pregnancy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2173. [PMID: 38927879 PMCID: PMC11202133 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16122173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cutaneous malignant melanoma is one of the most common neoplasms among pregnancy-associated cancers (PACs). Risk factors include excessive exposure to ultraviolet radiation, the presence of benign and dysplastic nevi, and a patient or family history of melanoma. Self-examination and careful inspection of nevi are crucial, especially in the context of their progression over time. Physiological changes that occur during pregnancy, such as the darkening and enlargement of the nevi, delay the diagnosis of CMM. In the fetus, metastases are very rare, and if they do occur, they concern the placenta or fetal tissues. The choice of treatment is influenced by the cancer stage, symptoms, the time of termination of pregnancy, and the patient's decision. Essential procedures which are safe for the fetus are diagnostic biopsy, ultrasound, and the therapeutic excision of the lesion and the affected lymph nodes. Other imaging methods can be used with a safe radiation dose limit of 100 mGy. Immunotherapy and targeted treatments must be carefully considered, because of their possible adverse effects on the fetus. An interdisciplinary approach to the problem of melanoma during pregnancy is necessary, involving doctors of various specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrycja Pelczar
- Student Scientific Society of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwillowska Str., 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (P.K.); (E.W.); (M.K.)
| | - Pola Kosteczko
- Student Scientific Society of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwillowska Str., 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (P.K.); (E.W.); (M.K.)
| | - Ewelina Wieczorek
- Student Scientific Society of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwillowska Str., 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (P.K.); (E.W.); (M.K.)
| | - Maciej Kwieciński
- Student Scientific Society of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwillowska Str., 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (P.K.); (E.W.); (M.K.)
| | - Aleksandra Kozłowska
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 13 Radziwillowska Str., 20-080 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Paulina Gil-Kulik
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwillowska Str., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arup G, Shravan N. Cancer and Pregnancy in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era: A Comprehensive Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9448-9457. [PMID: 37999104 PMCID: PMC10669942 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer during pregnancy, affecting 1 in 1000 pregnancies, is rising in incidence due to delayed childbearing and improved detection. Common types include breast cancer, melanoma and cervical cancer and Hodgkin's Lymphoma. There are several physiological changes that occur during pregnancy that make its management a challenge to clinicians. Managing it requires multidisciplinary approaches and cautious test interpretation due to overlapping symptoms. To minimize fetal radiation exposure, non-ionizing imaging is preferred, and the interpretation of tumor markers is challenging due to inflammation and pregnancy effects. In terms of treatment, chemotherapy is avoided in the first trimester but may be considered later. Immunotherapy's safety is under investigation, and surgery depends on gestational age and cancer type. Ethical and legal concerns are growing, especially with changes in U.S. abortion laws. Access to abortion for medical reasons is vital for pregnant cancer patients needing urgent treatment. Maternal outcomes may depend on the type of cancer as well as chemotherapy received but, in general, they are similar to the non-pregnant population. Fetal outcomes are usually the same as the general population with treatment exposure from the second trimester onwards. Fertility preservation may be an important component of the treatment discussion depending on the patient's wishes, age and type of treatment. This article addresses the complicated nature of a diagnosis of cancer in pregnancy, touching upon the known medical literature as well as the ethical-legal implications of such a diagnosis, whose importance has increased in the light of recent judicial developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ganguly Arup
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
| | - Narmala Shravan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, DHR Health Oncology Institute, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Panico C, Bottazzi S, Russo L, Avesani G, Celli V, D’Erme L, Cipriani A, Mascilini F, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Sala E, Gui B. Prediction of the Risk of Malignancy of Adnexal Masses during Pregnancy Comparing Subjective Assessment and Non-Contrast MRI Score (NCMS) in Radiologists with Different Expertise. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5138. [PMID: 37958313 PMCID: PMC10648807 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer represents 7% of all cancers in pregnant women. Characterising an ovarian mass during pregnancy is essential to avoid unnecessary treatment and, if treatment is required, to plan it accordingly. Although ultrasonography (US) is the first-line modality to characterise adnexal masses, MRI is indicated when adnexal masses are indeterminate at the US examination. An MRI risk stratification system has been proposed to assign a malignancy probability based on the adnexal lesion's MRI, but features of the scoring system require the administration of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents, a method that might have a limited use in pregnant women. The non-contrast MRI score (NCMS) has been used and evaluated in non-pregnant women to characterise adnexal masses indeterminate at the US examination. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the NCMS in pregnant women, analysing 20 cases referred to our specialised institution. We also evaluated the diagnostic agreement between two radiologists with different expertise. The two readers classified ovarian masses as benign or malignant using both subjective assessment (SA), based on the interpretive evaluation of imaging findings derived from personal experience, and the NCMS, which includes five categories where 4 and 5 indicate a high probability of a malignant mass. The expert radiologist correctly classified 90% of the diagnoses, using both SA and the NCMS, relying on a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 92.3%, with a false positive rate of 7.7% and a false negative rate of 14.3%. The non-expert radiologist correctly identified patients at a lower rate, especially using the SA. The analysis of the inter-observer agreement showed a K = 0.47 (95% CI: 0.48-0.94) for the SA (agreement in 71.4% of cases) and a K = 0.8 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00) for the NCMS (agreement in 90% of cases). Although in pregnant patients, non-contrast MRI is used, our results support the use of a quantitative score, i.e., the NCMS, as an accurate tool. This procedure may help less experienced radiologists to reduce the rate of false negatives or positives, especially in centres not specialised in gynaecological imaging, making the MRI interpretation easier and more accurate for radiologists who are not experts in the field, either.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Panico
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Silvia Bottazzi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Luca Russo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Giacomo Avesani
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Veronica Celli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Luca D’Erme
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Alessia Cipriani
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| | - Floriana Mascilini
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.M.); (A.F.); (G.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Gui
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (C.P.); (S.B.); (L.R.); (V.C.); (L.D.); (A.C.); (E.S.); (B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loibl S, Azim HA, Bachelot T, Berveiller P, Bosch A, Cardonick E, Denkert C, Halaska MJ, Hoeltzenbein M, Johansson ALV, Maggen C, Markert UR, Peccatori F, Poortmans P, Saloustros E, Saura C, Schmid P, Stamatakis E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, van Gerwen M, Vandecaveye V, Pentheroudakis G, Curigliano G, Amant F. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC). Ann Oncol 2023; 34:849-866. [PMID: 37572987 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Berveiller
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy; UMR 1198 - BREED, INRAE, Paris Saclay University, RHuMA, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - A Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Cardonick
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and Marburg University Hospital (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - M J Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Universital Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Hoeltzenbein
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy, Berlin, Germany
| | - A L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - U R Markert
- Placenta Lab, Department of Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - F Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - E Saloustros
- Department of Oncology, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - C Saura
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Schmid
- Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - E Stamatakis
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Alexandra' General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - M van Gerwen
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Amant
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Division Gynaecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Romano A, Mastrangelo S, Attina G, Maurizi P, Ruggiero A. Pregnancy-associated Cancer and Chemotherapy during Pregnancy. BIOMEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGY JOURNAL 2023; 16:705-714. [DOI: 10.13005/bpj/2652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of pregnancy-associated cancer, although rare, is a condition of great human and social significance and difficult clinical management. A pregnancy-associated neoplasm is defined as a cancer diagnosis made during pregnancy or within 12 months after delivery/abortion. The most common cancers in pregnancy occur most frequently in women of reproductive age with an incidence overall like that observed in non-pregnant women of the same age. This incidence is likely to increase in view of both the expected increase in certain malignancies among young women (particularly breast cancer and melanoma) and the increasing frequency of pregnancies undertaken later in life (fourth and fifth decades of life) that is characterizing modern society. Chemotherapy is generally contraindicated before 12 weeks of pregnancy due to the increased risk of congenital anomalies while exposure in the second and third trimester of pregnancy to chemotherapy has been associated with more growth restriction and preterm delivery. Clinical decisions about the optimal management should consider maternal and fetal characteristics with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Romano
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mastrangelo
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Attina
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Palma Maurizi
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Ruggiero
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Kluger H, Langdon J, Menias C, VanBuren W, Leventhal J, Baumann R, Revzin M. Melanoma in pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1740-1751. [PMID: 36719425 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03796-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Melanoma is one of the most common types of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy. Patients with advanced disease require frequent staging examinations (e.g., CT, PET, MRI, ultrasound), which, during pregnancy must be modified from routine protocol to minimize risk to the fetus. We will review the diagnostic and treatment approach to pregnant patients with melanoma, with a discussion and pictorial examples of imaging protocol modifications, and the appearance of metastatic melanoma on radiology exams using modified protocols due to pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harriet Kluger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jonathan Langdon
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Margarita Revzin
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tembelis M, Frederick-Dyer KC, Dyer JL, Planz VB, Moshiri M. Medicolegal considerations associated with cancer during pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1637-1644. [PMID: 36538081 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03776-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
The management of pregnant patients with cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary team to effectively diagnose, stage, and manage the cancer while also being cognizant of the potential harm that diagnosis and treatment may have on the maternal and fetal well-being. Beyond the complex clinical management of these patients is additional medicolegal consideration. Radiologists play a crucial role in the management of these patients as their knowledge of diagnostic and interventional radiology techniques allows for appropriate and safe imaging for both the mother and fetus. In addition, radiologist are able to educate patient on the different imaging modalities and techniques, thus allowing patients to make informed decisions and maintain autonomy over there care. This article will review safety considerations associated with different imaging modalities, contrast agents, interventional radiology procedures and moderate sedation related to the imaging of pregnant patient with cancer with specific attention paid to the medicolegal aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miltiadis Tembelis
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Hospital Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
| | - Katherine C Frederick-Dyer
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | | | - Virginia B Planz
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Mariam Moshiri
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jha P, Lenaerts L, Vermeesch J, Norton M, Amant F, Glanc P, Poder L. Noninvasive prenatal screening and maternal malignancy: role of imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1590-1598. [PMID: 37095202 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03913-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) tests for fetal chromosomal anomalies through maternal blood sampling. It is becoming widely available and standard of care for pregnant women in many countries. It is performed in the first trimester of pregnancy, usually between 9 and 12 weeks. Fragments of fetal cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) floating in maternal plasma are detected and analyzed by this test to assess for chromosomal aberrations. Similarly, maternal tumor-derived cell-free DNA (ctDNA) released from the tumor cells also circulates in the plasma. Hence, the presence of genomic anomalies originating from maternal tumor-derived DNA may be detected on the NIPS-based fetal risk assessment in pregnant patients. Presence of multiple aneuploidies or autosomal monosomies are the most commonly reported NIPS abnormalities detected with occult maternal malignancies. When such results are received, the search for an occult maternal malignancy begins, in which imaging plays a crucial role. The most commonly detected malignancies via NIPS are leukemia, lymphoma, breast and colon cancers. Ultrasound is a reasonable radiation-free modality for imaging during pregnancy, specially when there are localizing symptoms or findings, such as palpable lumps. While there are no consensus guidelines on the imaging evaluation for these patients, when there are no localizing symptoms or clinically palpable findings, whole body MRI is recommended as the radiation-free modality of choice to search for an occult malignancy. Based on clinical symptoms, practice patterns, and available resources, breast ultrasound, chest radiographs, and targeted ultrasound evaluations can also be performed initially or as a follow-up for MRI findings. CT is reserved for exceptional circumstances due to its higher radiation dose. This article intends to increase awareness of this rare but stressful clinical scenario and guide imaging evaluation for occult malignancy detected via NIPS during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Jha
- Department of Radiology, Division of Body Imaging, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| | | | - Joris Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Centre of Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mary Norton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liina Poder
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mainprize JG, Yaffe MJ, Chawla T, Glanc P. Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1564-1578. [PMID: 36933026 PMCID: PMC10024285 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03861-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the effects of ionizing radiation to the conceptus and the relationship to the timing of the exposure during pregnancy. To consider strategies that would mitigate potential harms associated with exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. METHODS Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on entrance KERMA received from specific radiological examinations were combined with published results from experiment or Monte Carlo modeling of tissue and organ doses per entrance KERMA to estimate total doses that could be received from specific procedures. Data reported in the peer-reviewed literature on dose mitigation strategies, best practices for shielding, consent, counseling and emerging technologies were reviewed. RESULTS For procedures utilizing ionizing radiation for which the conceptus is not included in the primary radiation beam, typical doses are well below the threshold for causing tissue reactions and the risk of induction of childhood cancer is low. For procedures that include the conceptus in the primary radiation field, longer fluoroscopic interventional procedures or multiphase/multiple exposures potentially could approach or exceed thresholds for tissue reactions and the risk of cancer induction must be weighed against the expected risk/benefit of performing (or not) the imaging examination. Gonadal shielding is no longer considered best practice. Emerging technologies such as whole-body DWI/MRI, dual-energy CT and ultralow dose studies are gaining importance for overall dose reduction strategies. CONCLUSION The ALARA principle, considering potential benefits and risks should be followed with respect to the use of ionizing radiation. Nevertheless, as Wieseler et al. (2010) state, "no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration." Best practices require updates on current available technologies and guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James G. Mainprize
- Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave., Rm S632/S657, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5 Canada
| | - Martin J. Yaffe
- Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave., Rm S632/S657, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5 Canada
- Departments of Medical Biophysics and Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave., Rm S657, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5 Canada
| | - Tanya Chawla
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5 Canada
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- Departments Medical Imaging, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Rm MG 160, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bioethical issues in imaging cancer in pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1816-1818. [PMID: 36918412 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03855-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
|
12
|
Houk JL, Kruse DE, Minkemeyer VM, Thomas SP, Jaffe TA. The role of the radiologist in patient care following Dobbs v. Jackson. Clin Imaging 2023; 98:59-60. [PMID: 37001473 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
|
13
|
The radiologist's role in a multidisciplinary approach to cancer in pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1605-1611. [PMID: 36705722 PMCID: PMC10149443 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03809-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) occurs in approximately 1 in 1000 pregnancies, and the incidence is expected to rise due to delayed childbearing (Silverstein et al. in JCO Oncol Pract 16:545-557, 2020; Woitek et al. in ESMO Open 1:e000017, 2016). Diagnosis and management of PACs are challenging and diagnosis is often delayed as symptoms may overlap with physiologic changes of pregnancy (Jha et al. in RadioGraphics 42:220005, 2022). These patients are best cared for by a multidisciplinary healthcare team composed of experts (Silverstein et al. in JCO Oncol Pract 16:545-557, 2020). Management of these patients must balance optimal maternal care with potentially harmful fetal effects. This involves honest, forthright, and sometimes difficult discussions between the care team and the patient throughout the entirety of care. Radiologists play a significant role in timely cancer diagnosis, staging and follow-up during and after pregnancy, accurate determination of gestational age, and in assessing fetal growth and well-being throughout pregnancy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cancer in pregnancy: treatment effects. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2023; 48:1774-1783. [PMID: 36639533 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03787-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pregnant patients present a unique challenge to cancer therapy. Due to the potential catastrophic implications related to teratogenic effects or pregnancy loss, oncologic management of this vulnerable patient group must be strategic and personalized. METHODS This article will discuss the unique treatment approach to the pregnant cancer patient. This includes discussion of the role of imaging during staging, treatment, and follow-up with an emphasis on avoiding ionizing radiation when possible. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Specific considerations and modifications to standard cancer treatments, including surgery and systemic therapies such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapies are crucial components of providing oncologic care to minimize negative effects to the mother and developing fetus. Radiation and proton therapy are also options that may be employed in specific circumstances. Finally, this article will address the long-term treatment effects of these therapies on future fertility.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gastrointestinal malignancies in pregnancy. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2023; 48:1709-1723. [PMID: 36607401 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03788-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal malignancies, though uncommon in pregnancy, present several unique challenges with regards to diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Imaging the pregnant patient with a suspected or confirmed GI malignancy requires modifications to the radiologic modality of choice and protocol in order to minimize harm to the fetus, ensure accuracy in diagnosis and staging and guide treatment decisions. In this review article, we discuss the imaging approach to the pregnant patient with GI cancer, including safe radiologic modalities and modifications to imaging protocols. We also review the most common GI cancers encountered in pregnancy, including colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, and small bowel tumors, with emphasis to imaging findings, staging, and treatment considerations.
Collapse
|
16
|
Cancer in pregnancy: overview and epidemiology. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 48:1559-1563. [PMID: 35960309 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03633-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Cancer in pregnancy, one of the most distressing and demanding conditions in all of women's health care, occurs about 1:1000 pregnancies with an increasing incidence due to delayed childbearing. Diagnosis of pregnancy associated cancer is especially challenging because tumor symptoms may be masked by normal physiologic changes of pregnancy. The burden of care for both mother and child goes well beyond factual medical information. Balancing the potential risks and benefits to the mother and fetus necessitates a superior level of knowledge and expertise that includes epidemiology, pathophysiology, ionizing radiation and teratogenesis, risks and benefits of various imaging modalities, oncology, and radiotherapy, and other areas. Radiologists are an integral part of a multidisciplinary team that shares responsibility for selection of safe and effective diagnosis and management. Throughout the course of treatment, counseling and support are of paramount importance to the patient and her family. A compassionate culture of care bolsters the effectiveness of the care team to inform, counsel, and engage with the patient to achieve optimal outcomes. This special section of Abdominal Radiology is meant to offer insights for diagnostic imaging and its role in personalized management of this most serious and challenging condition. This article will provide an overview of imaging cancer in pregnancy and detail the relevant epidemiology.
Collapse
|