1
|
Fiorello N, Zucchi A, Gregori F, Romei G, Fiorenzo S, Di Benedetto A, Bossa R, Mogorovich A, Summonti D, Benvenuti S, Pastore AL, Sepich CA. Urinary Leakage after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is Always Predictive of Functional Results? Urol Int 2024:1-6. [PMID: 39278206 DOI: 10.1159/000541409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to evaluate if and when the presence of radiological urinary leakages of vesico-urethral anastomosis, after robotic radical prostatectomy, could provoke urethral strictures or affect continence recovery. METHODS We enrolled 216 patients, undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2020 and December 2022 in three high-volume referenced centres for robotic surgery. Before removal of the bladder catheter, all patients underwent a cystourethrography in which the presence/absence of leakage was assessed at level of vesico-urethral anastomosis. Based on degree of severity of urinary leakage on cystourethrography, patients were classified as no leakage or grade 0, grade 1 with transversal diameter ≤1 cm, and grade 2 with transversal diameter ≥1 cm. At follow-up, urethral stenosis formation and urinary continence recovery were assessed; furthermore, post-operative 12-month functional outcome was determined using EORTC-QLQ-PR25 questionnaire. RESULTS Radiological urinary leakage was found in 30 patients with grade 1 and 33 patients with grade 2, for a total of 63 patients. Only 1 patient (1.5%), grade 2 urinary leakage, developed significant urethral stricture and required endoscopic urethrotomy after 6 months. Analysing the differences in those who removed the bladder catheter after 7-9 days and those who kept it longer, we found no statistically significant differences regarding recovery of continence (p = 0.23) or about urinary symptoms (p = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS RARP remains gold-standard approach for treatment of localized prostate cancer and the superiority of this technique is safe in preventing urethral strictures and continence recovery, even in presence of significant anastomotic urinary leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Zucchi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Gregori
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gregorio Romei
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Salvatore Fiorenzo
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Bossa
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Luigi Pastore
- Department of Science and Technologies for Medicine and Surgery, University "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mingels C, Loebelenz LI, Huber AT, Alberts I, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A, Obmann VC. Literature review: Imaging in prostate cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2023:100968. [PMID: 37336689 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
Imaging plays an increasingly important role in the detection and characterization of prostate cancer (PC). This review summarizes the key conventional and advanced imaging modalities including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and tries to instruct clinicians in finding the best image modality depending on the patient`s PC-stage. We aim to give an overview of the different image modalities and their benefits and weaknesses in imaging PC. Emphasis is put on primary prostate cancer detection and staging as well as on recurrent and castration resistant prostate cancer. Results from studies using various imaging techniques are discussed and compared. For the different stages of PC, advantages and disadvantages of the different imaging modalities are discussed. Moreover, this review aims to give an outlook about upcoming, new imaging modalities and how they might be implemented in the future into clinical routine. Imaging patients suffering from PC should aim for exact diagnosis, accurate detection of PC lesions and should mirror the true tumor burden. Imaging should lead to the best patient treatment available in the current PC-stage and should avoid unnecessary therapeutic interventions. New image modalities such as long axial field of view PET/CT with photon-counting CT and radiopharmaceuticals like androgen receptor targeting radiopharmaceuticals open up new possibilities. In conclusion, PC imaging is growing and each image modality is aiming for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Mingels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Laura I Loebelenz
- Department of Interventional, Pediatric and Diagnostic Radiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Adrian T Huber
- Department of Interventional, Pediatric and Diagnostic Radiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ian Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Verena C Obmann
- Department of Interventional, Pediatric and Diagnostic Radiology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arikan Y, Eksi M, Tasci AI. Comparison of oncological and functional outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Updates Surg 2023:10.1007/s13304-023-01453-3. [PMID: 36788157 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01453-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the functional, oncological, and complication outcomes of perineoscopic radical prostatectomy (PeRP) and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) operations. Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between October 2018 and June 2020 for localized prostate cancer (N0, < T3) were retrospectively screened. After the exclusion criteria, 56 patients who underwent PeRP and 67 patients who underwent RARP remained in the study. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected. In functional outcomes, continence and potency status were compared at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The mean age of the patients was 61.3 ± 5.9 years in the PeRP group and 62.2 ± 5.7 years in the RARP group. No statistically significant differences were present between preoperative and postoperative values. Among the perioperative findings, the mean operation time was 90.4 ± 11.2 min for the PeRP group and 114.6 ± 14.7 min for the RARP group. The operation time was shorter in the PeRP group. The average hospital stay was 2 ± 0.6 days in the PeRP group and 2.3 ± 0.5 days in the RARP group. It was significantly shorter in the PeRP group. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the oncological and functional results. PeRP is a surgical procedure safe in low-risk patients with medium-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who do not require lymph-node dissection. Moreover, PeRP minimizes the difficulties of perineal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf Arikan
- Urology, Mus State Hospital, Saray Mah., Yeni Hastane Cad., No:1/A, Muş Merkez, Turkey.
| | - Mithat Eksi
- Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Ihsan Tasci
- Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Zuhuratbaba Mh. Tevfik Saglam Cd. No:11 Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohsen N. Role of MRI, Ultrasound, and Computed Tomography in the Management of Prostate Cancer. PET Clin 2022; 17:565-583. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
5
|
Abstract
To discuss the imaging appearances of various pathologies affecting adult male urethra and to review the role of imaging in the assessment of artificial urinary sphincters and penile prostheses. Diagnosis of common male urethral diseases heavily depends on two conventional fluoroscopic techniques namely retrograde urethrography and voiding cystourethrography. These are useful in evaluating common urethral diseases like traumatic injury, infections, and strictures. Cross-sectional imaging can be useful in evaluating periurethral pathologies. Artificial urinary sphincters, slings, and periurethral bulking agents are used in the management of urinary incontinence and imaging can be utilized to detect complications in these devices. Cross-sectional imaging especially MRI plays a significant role in evaluating the different types of penile prostheses and their malfunctioning.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ierardi AM, Jannone ML, Brambillasca PM, Zannoni S, Damiani G, Rossi UG, Granata AM, Petrillo M, Carrafiello G. Bleeding after prostatectomy: endovascular management. Gland Surg 2019; 8:108-114. [PMID: 31183320 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.02.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Background To evaluate role of interventional radiology (IR) in post-surgical haemorrhagic complications of prostatectomy. Methods A retrospective study was performed. From April 2015 to January 2018, 10 patients referred to IR Department for haemorrhagic complications post radical prostatectomy (RP). All patients (mean age: 68.5 years; range, 58-85 years) were successfully treated with superselective trans-arterial embolization. We evaluated technical and clinical success and post procedural complications. Results Technical and clinical success was 100% (10/10) and no major complications were identified. No complications related to the endovascular procedures occurred. No recurrences during follow-up (8-20 months) were observed. Among minor complications, only 20% (2/10) developed mild post embolization syndrome. Conclusions The endovascular management of significant haemorrhage after prostatectomy is safe and long-term effective, with no major ischaemic events associated to embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Ierardi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Jannone
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Maria Brambillasca
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Zannoni
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Umberto G Rossi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Interventional Radiology Unit, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Mario Petrillo
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chorney ET, Ramchandani P, Jaffe WI, Siegelman ES. CT and MR Imaging Features of Artificial Urinary Sphincters, Penile Prostheses, and Other Devices in the Male Lower Genitourinary Tract. Radiographics 2018; 38:794-805. [PMID: 29757723 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are relatively common conditions in the aging male population. Surgical interventions for urinary incontinence include placement of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), perineal sling, or sacral nerve stimulator and injections of periurethral bulking agents. Erectile dysfunction can be treated surgically with placement of a penile prosthesis. The complications of these devices can be broadly categorized as device component malposition, malfunction, and infection. This article focuses on AUSs, penile prostheses, and their complications. Familiarity with these devices and their complications allows the radiologist to effectively describe these implants in radiologic reports and to recognize complications when they occur. This article reviews the normal cross-sectional radiologic appearance of the most common implants used to surgically treat male urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, as well as the potential complications associated with these devices. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth T Chorney
- From PENRAD Imaging and Colorado Springs Radiologists, Colorado Springs, Colo (E.T.C.); and Departments of Radiology (P.R., E.S.S.) and Urology (W.I.J.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, MRI 1 Founders, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
| | - Parvati Ramchandani
- From PENRAD Imaging and Colorado Springs Radiologists, Colorado Springs, Colo (E.T.C.); and Departments of Radiology (P.R., E.S.S.) and Urology (W.I.J.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, MRI 1 Founders, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
| | - William I Jaffe
- From PENRAD Imaging and Colorado Springs Radiologists, Colorado Springs, Colo (E.T.C.); and Departments of Radiology (P.R., E.S.S.) and Urology (W.I.J.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, MRI 1 Founders, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
| | - Evan S Siegelman
- From PENRAD Imaging and Colorado Springs Radiologists, Colorado Springs, Colo (E.T.C.); and Departments of Radiology (P.R., E.S.S.) and Urology (W.I.J.), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, MRI 1 Founders, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Song W, Park JH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY. Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes and Complications According to Surgical Approach to Radical Prostatectomy: Special Focus on the Perineal Approach. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e645-e652. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Revised: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
9
|
Vicens RA, Rodriguez J, Sheplan L, Mayo C, Mayo L, Jensen C. Brachytherapy in pelvic malignancies: a review for radiologists. ABDOMINAL IMAGING 2015; 40:2645-2659. [PMID: 25820802 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0407-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Brachytherapy, also known as sealed source or internal radiation therapy, involves placement of a radioactive source immediately adjacent to or within tumor, thus enabling delivery of a localized high dose of radiation. Compared with external beam radiation which must first pass through non-target tissues, brachytherapy results in less radiation dose to normal tissues. In the past decade, brachytherapy use has markedly increased, thus radiologists are encountering brachytherapy devices and their associated post-treatment changes to increasing degree. This review will present a variety of brachytherapy devices that radiologists may encounter during diagnostic pelvic imaging with a focus on prostate and gynecologic malignancies. The reader will become familiar with the function, correct position, and potential complications of brachytherapy devices in an effort to improve diagnostic reporting and communication with clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael A Vicens
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Auxilio Mutuo, Hato Rey, PR, 00919, USA.
| | - Joshua Rodriguez
- School of Medicine, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, PR, USA
| | - Lawrence Sheplan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Auxilio Mutuo, Hato Rey, PR, USA
| | - Cody Mayo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Virgina, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Lauren Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Corey Jensen
- Department of Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tonolini M, Villa F, Bianco R. Multidetector CT imaging of post-robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy complications. Insights Imaging 2013; 4:711-21. [PMID: 24018752 PMCID: PMC3781251 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-013-0280-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2013] [Revised: 07/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is currently accepted as the preferred minimally invasive surgical treatment for localised prostate cancer, with optimal oncologic and functional results. Despite growing surgical experience, reduced postoperative morbidity and hospital stays, RALRP-related complications may occur, which are severe in 5–7 % of patients and sometimes require reoperation. Therefore, in hospitals with an active urologic surgery, urgent diagnostic imaging is increasingly requested to assess suspected early complications following RALRP surgery. Methods Based upon our experience, this pictorial review discusses basic principles of the surgical technique, the optimal multidetector CT (MDCT) techniques to be used in the postoperative urologic setting, the normal postoperative anatomy and imaging appearances. Results Afterwards, we review and illustrate the varied spectrum of RALRP-related complications including haemorrhage, urinary leaks, anorectal injuries, peritoneal changes, surgical site infections, abscess collections and lymphoceles, venous thrombosis and port site hernias. Conclusion Knowledge of surgical procedure details, appropriate MDCT acquisition techniques, and familiarity with normal postoperative imaging appearances and possible complications are needed to correctly perform and interpret early post-surgical imaging studies, particularly to identify those occurrences that require prolonged in-hospital treatment or surgical reintervention. Teaching points • Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy allows minimally invasive surgery of localised cancer • Urologic surgeons may request urgent imaging to assess suspected postoperative complications • Main complications include haemorrhage, urine leaks, anorectal injuries, infections and lymphoceles • Correct multidetector CT techniques allow identifying haematomas, active bleeding and extravasated urine • Imaging postoperative complications is crucial to assess the need for surgical reoperation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Tonolini
- Department of Radiology, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wroński S. Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy. Cent European J Urol 2012; 65:188-94. [PMID: 24578960 PMCID: PMC3921814 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2012.04.art2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2012] [Revised: 08/12/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery plays a central role in the management of organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). Four types of prostatectomy are currently practiced: perineal, retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted. The qualification criteria for all types are similar. Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) was the first method introduced into clinical practice, however, it has been neglected in favor of other procedures. Its resurgence has been facilitated by a multitude of advantages. Unfortunately, nowadays most urologists are not familiar with the perineal approach though many centers have begun to implement it. MATERIALS AND METHODS This manuscript presents the technique of RPP used in the author's institution. It also reviews a vast body of literature on the four techniques of prostatectomy including their advantages and outcomes. The data was collected from the literature and medical databases. CONCLUSION RPP proves to be a very efficacious, cost-effective treatment option for localized PCa. The outcomes of RPP, as defined by continence, potency, and complication rate, are equivalent to those accomplished by other methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanisław Wroński
- Department of Urology, J. Biziel Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Williams TR, Longoria OJ, Asselmeier S, Menon M. Incidence and imaging appearance of urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leaks following da Vinci robotic prostatectomy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 33:367-70. [PMID: 17566817 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-007-9247-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advent of the da Vinci robotic prostatectomy has several advantages over open and laparoscopic prostatectomy, including fewer complications, better continence and potency. We evaluate the incidence and imaging features of urinary leaks after robotic prostatectomy. METHODS A retrospective study examining the anastomotic leak rates from 490 consecutive robotic prostatectomy patients. Routine postoperative cystography on day 7 was reviewed for presence and severity of urinary anastomotic leaks. RESULTS A total of 490 patients were reviewed, of which 442 had cystographic imaging postoperatively (n = 442). A total of 67 urinary leaks were identified; 40 were small, limited extraperitoneal leaks confined to the surgical bed, 21 were moderate sized leaks limited to the extraperitoneal pelvic space, and six extended in to the peritoneal cavity. Two of these six patients required CT-guided drainage for peritoneal urinoma. Other cystography findings included two cases of vesicoureteral reflux and one case of colovesical fistula. CONCLUSION The incidence of postoperative anastomotic urinary leaks following robotic prostatectomy (13.6%) is the same or better than laparoscopic prostatectomy and traditional radical retropubic prostatectomy. The vast majority of urethrovesical leaks are transient, requiring no follow-up intervention. The incidence of large anastomotic leaks requiring CT guided intervention is exceedingly low 2/490 (<0.5%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd R Williams
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Crawford ED, Kavanagh BD. The role of alpha-blockers in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2006; 29:517-23. [PMID: 17023790 DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000225412.24750.4c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used for the treatment of prostate cancer, either via brachytherapy or external beam, and is often accompanied by dose-related obstructive and irritative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This review will analyze the current state of knowledge of LUTS secondary to RT for prostate cancer and review treatment options for this complication. METHODS A review of the literature. RESULTS Radiation-induced effects in the lower urinary tract that result in LUTS include injury to peripheral neurons, interstitial fibrosis of the bladder, and loss of muscle fibers in the muscularis propria. LUTS are associated with a diminished quality of life and impaired sexual function. Numerous nonrandomized studies and one randomized study support the proposition that the occurrence of LUTS secondary to RT is effectively mitigated by alpha1-adrenoreceptor blockade. CONCLUSIONS Basic and clinical science studies as well as clinical guidelines relevant for LUTS secondary to RT suggest that the routine use of alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonists should be considered in patients treated with RT, either prophylactically or at the earliest sign of LUTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E David Crawford
- Department of Urologic Oncology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80010, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|