From the radiologic pathology archives: diseases of the male breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation

Imaging the Male Breast: Gynecomastia, Male Breast Cancer, and Beyond

The number of men undergoing breast imaging has increased in recent years, according to some reports. Most male breast concerns are related to benign causes, most commonly gynecomastia. The range of abnormalities typically encountered in the male breast is less broad than that encountered in women, given that lobule formation rarely occurs in men. Other benign causes of male breast palpable abnormalities with characteristic imaging findings include lipomas, sebaceous or epidermal inclusion cysts, and intramammary lymph nodes. Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, representing up to 1% of breast cancer cases, but some data indicate that its incidence is increasing. MBC demonstrates some clinical features that overlap with those of gynecomastia, including a propensity for the subareolar breast. Men with breast cancer tend to present at a later stage than do women. MBC typically has similar imaging features to those of female breast cancer, often characterized by an irregular mass that may have associated calcifications. Occasionally, however, MBC has a benign-appearing imaging phenotype, with an oval shape and circumscribed margins, and therefore most solid breast masses in men require tissue diagnosis. Histopathologic evaluation may alternatively reveal other benign breast masses found in men, including papillomas, myofibroblastomas, and hemangiomas. Radiologists must be familiar with the breadth of male breast abnormalities to meet the rising challenge of caring for these patients. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Male Breast Cancer: Imaging Considerations for Diagnosis and Surveillance

Male breast cancer accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. The important risk factors for the development of male breast cancer are family history, genetic mutations, obesity, liver disease, alcoholism, exogenous estrogen administration, and radiation exposure to the chest area. Despite its rarity, numerous studies have investigated the data on imaging considerations (mammogram, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), but have addressed only certain aspects of male breast cancer. A comprehensive approach on the imaging characteristics, timing of imaging, prognostication based on imaging characteristics, and follow-up strategies in male breast cancer are still lacking. The purpose of this review article was to provide a comprehensive overview of the imaging findings, optimal timing to obtain imaging, and the appropriate follow-up strategies in male breast cancer survivors. This article also describes how imaging modalities can aid in determining prognosis. By addressing this knowledge gap, the article provides valuable insights for clinicians managing this uncommon yet clinically significant disease.

Male Breast: A Review of the Literature and Current State of the Art of Diagnostic Imaging Work-Up

Pathological conditions affecting the male breast (MB) share some similarities with those found in women, while others are specific to men. The first part of this review provides an overview of MB disorders, exploring the most common types of MB diseases. The second part then emphasizes the state-of-the-art approaches proposed in the literature for screening and follow-up with MB cancer patients, which highlights the importance of tailored strategies for diagnosis, follow-up, and identifying high-risk populations. Considering the increasing attention in recent years on the topic, transgender individuals are also included in this review. Together with the MB, it is an understudied category thus far. This review aims to raise awareness among radiologists that MBs should be approached differently from female breasts, contributing to the advancement of medical knowledge, improving patient outcomes, and promoting early detection of MB disorders. The review also provides an update on breast cancer and screening in the transgender population.

Tumoral pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) of the male breast: A systematic analysis

<b><br>Aim:</b> The study was conducted to systematically analyze the recent peer-reviewed literature related to tumoral pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) in males.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> Articles published in peer-reviewed journals of repute from 2012 to 2023 were evaluated for eight variables: 1) the age of the patient, 2) clinical presentation, 3) laterality (unilateral or bilateral), 4) associated breast disorder, 5) the presence of systemic co-morbidity, 6) imaging modalities aiding diagnosis, 7) treatment, and 8) recurrence.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> There were 10 patients ranging in age from 1 year to 67 years (mean: 34.5 years). In 8 cases (80%), there were breast lumps; in 2 cases (20%), there were axillary lumps at presentation. Pain was not a prominent symptom. Six patients (60%) had another breast disorder at presentation and 3 (30%) had significant systemic co-morbidities, including diabetes and renal insufficiency. The greatest dimension of the lumps ranged from 2 cm to 12 cm, with 80% of the lumps being below 5 cm in size. Imaging modalities utilized in evaluation included breast ultrasound (USG), mammograms, computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All the cases were treated surgically, and the final diagnosis was made only after the analysis of the surgical specimen. Recurrence was recorded in 2 (20%) cases.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Tumoral PASH is a benign myofibroblastic proliferation disorder rarely reported in males. This condition should be considered a differential diagnosis of breast or axillary lumps, and an evaluation should be initiated accordingly. The recommended course of treatment is adequate surgical excision with regular clinical and radiological follow-up.</br>.

Breast mass as the first sign of metastasis from rectal carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

We present a case report of a 41-year-old woman who developed a left breast mass 18 months after undergoing Dixon rectal cancer surgery. The purpose of this case report is to highlight the possibility of breast metastases in patients with colorectal cancer and emphasize the importance of careful evaluation and follow-up as well as timely and accurate diagnosis and management of the metastatic disease. During the physical examination in 2021, we noted that the lower border of the mass was 9 cm from the anal verge and that it occupied approximately one-third of the intestinal lumen. A pathological biopsy revealed the mass in the patient's intestinal lumen was a rectal adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent Dixon surgery for rectal cancer and received subsequent chemotherapy. The patient had no prior history of breast-related medical conditions or a family history of breast cancer. During the current physical examination, we discovered multiple lymphadenopathies in the patient's left neck, bilateral axillae, and left inguinal region, but none elsewhere. We observed a large erythema of about 15x10 cm on the patient's left breast, with scattered hard nodes of varying sizes. Palpation of the area beyond the upper left breast revealed a mass measuring 3x3 cm. We conducted further examinations of the patient, which revealed the breast mass and lymphadenopathy on imaging. However, we did not find any other imaging that had significant diagnostic value. Based on the patient's conventional pathology and immunohistochemical findings, combined with the patient's past medical history, we strongly suspected that the patient's breast mass was of rectal origin. This was confirmed by the abdominal CT performed afterward. The patient was treated with a chemotherapy regimen consisting of irinotecan 260 mg, fluorouracil 2.25 g, and cetuximab 700 mg IV drip, which resulted in a favorable clinical response. This case illustrates that colorectal cancer can metastasize to unusual sites and underscores the importance of thorough evaluation and follow-up, particularly when symptoms are atypical. It also highlights the importance of timely and accurate diagnosis and management of metastatic disease to improve the patient's prognosis.

Female-Type Presentation of Male Breast Cancer in Mammography and Its Clinical Implications

Introduction Male breast cancer is rare, accounting for about 1% of total breast cancer cases. In contrast to gynecomastia, which has a painful, soft, movable mass concentric to the nipple, the traditional presentation is a painless, hard, eccentric retro-areolar mass. However, when cancer occurs concurrently with significant gynecomastia, the mammographic pattern simulates female-type breast cancer, whereby there is a variable location and pattern of cancer. This study addresses the clinical and radiologic implications of this combination of gynecomastia and co-existing breast cancer. This combined presentation has not been highlighted thus far. Materials and method Following institutional approval, a retrospective study of male breast cancer was conducted over a 10-year period (2011-2021) in a single institution. Age, clinical presentation, risk factors, comorbidities, imaging results, and comprehensive pathology reports were all obtained from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Patients who did not have an initial imaging examination were eliminated from the study. Results There were 17 cases in all that were investigated. Nine of the men exhibited a classic presentation appearance, whereas eight had gynecomastia. The mean age was 58 years. The female-type presentation included multicentric cancers away from the nipple, diffuse parenchymal involvement, leukemia/lymphoma, and positive axillary lymphadenopathy without intramammary lesion, some of which had delayed investigation due to clinical suspicion of gynecomastia or breast swelling. All of the radiologic diagnoses were accurate. The pathology report in all except two cases was hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Conclusion Female-type presentation of male breast cancer is highlighted to prevent false clinical impressions and delayed radiologic investigation and treatment. Mammography readily identifies such cancers and should be requested at the initial clinical presentation of males with significant gynecomastia or risk factor.

Sonographic Features of Palpable Breast and Axillary Lesions in Adult Male Patients: A Pictorial Essay

The male breast is a non-functional and rudimentary organ, but similarly to the female breast, it can be affected by various diseases. In contrast to female breast cancer, male breast cancer has a low incidence, and there is no established breast cancer screening program for male patients. Therefore, the diagnostic evaluation is usually performed in male patients with symptoms such as palpability or pain in the breasts. Furthermore, most adult male patients who visit breast clinics sometimes present with not only breast symptoms but also axillary symptoms, and both the breast and axilla are usually examined during breast ultrasonography in daily clinical practice. The purpose of this pictorial essay was to present the sonographic features of various palpable breast and axillary lesions in adult male patients.

The ins and outs of male breast and anterior chest wall lesions from childhood to adulthood

Physiological and pathological processes arising from the breast and anterior chest wall may share similar clinical presentations because of the small volume of male breasts. Therefore, imaging is frequently required to localise and characterise the lesion and guide biopsy when radiological findings are equivocal or suspicious. Mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound are the mainstays of breast imaging work-up. Other imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography (PET) can sometimes augment the investigation and aid treatment planning. This article reviews the key imaging features of a wide spectrum of benign and malignant conditions that involve the male breast and anterior chest wall across various age groups. Familiarisation with the salient radiological findings is essential for reaching an accurate diagnosis and optimising management.

Male Breast Cancer: The Three Decades' Experience of a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Lower-Middle Income Country

Introduction

Male breast cancer is uncommon and managed on the guidelines of female breast cancer due to tumor rarity. We sought to identify the incidence, clinicopathological features, and survival of all male breast cancer patients managed in our hospital.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan, from January 1986 to December 2018. Demographic data, treatment records, and follow-up data of all male breast cancer patients who were treated at AKUH was reviewed.

Results

Thirty-eight out of 42 patients who presented over a period of 32 years were included. The mean age was 63 years. The most common tumor type and subtype were invasive ductal carcinoma (89.5%) and luminal A (73.7%), respectively. The majority (36.8%) of the patients presented at stage III. Among 30 (78.9%) patients who underwent surgery, mastectomy was performed in 30 (78.9%), upfront axillary clearance in 24 (63.2%), axillary sampling in five (15.1%) cases, and sentinel lymph node biopsy in one (2.6%) case. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 10 (26.3%) patients, and adjuvant chemotherapy to eight (21.1%) patients. Adjuvant hormonal treatment was administered to 22 (57.9%) patients, and 13 (34%) patients received adjuvant radiation to the chest wall. The five-year overall survival was 38.2% and the median survival was 36 months. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was found to be 33.7%.

Conclusion

Breast cancer in males presents at an advanced stage with poor survival. Multicenter studies are required to accurately identify incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes in order to have a better understanding of its management.

Differences in ultrasonographic features between males and females with breast cancer of the luminal A and luminal B molecular subtypes

AIM

To analyze the relationships between the ultrasonographic features and the molecular subtypes of breast cancer in men and women.

METHODS

Data were collected from 43 males and 80 females with breast cancer who were treated at our hospital. The following ultrasonographic characteristics of the tumors were evaluated: shape, orientation, margin, echo pattern, posterior features, calcifications, Color Doppler Flow Imaging, and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category.

RESULTS

On ultrasound, a nonparallel orientation, noncircumscribed margin, and attenuating posterior features were associated with luminal A lesions. A parallel orientation (P = 0.002), circumscribed margin (P = 0.04), no change in posterior features (P < 0.001), and the BI-RADS 4 category (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with luminal B lesions. In the group with luminal A lesions, male patients were older (P = 0.001) and a greater number of the tumors exhibited a regular shape (P = 0.009), circumscribed margin (P < 0.001), no change in posterior features (P < 0.001), and the BI-RADS 4 category (P < 0.001) than those in female patients. Male patients were older (P < 0.001) and a greater number showed a no change in posterior features (P < 0.001), spotty blood flow (P = 0.002), and the BI-RADS 4 category (P < 0.001) than female patients with masses of the luminal B subtype.

CONCLUSION

Obvious differences in the ultrasonographic and pathological features were noted between breast cancer in males and females, which provided the theoretical basis for the individualized treatment of breast cancer, particularly breast cancer in males.

Benign cyst of the male breast. An exceedingly rare entity that may pose a diagnostic dilemma. Management and literature review

Cysts represent the most common cause of a breast mass in women. On the contrary, in men, the presence of a benign apocrine cyst is an exceedingly rare occurrence, with only a few cases reported in the literature. We describe herein a case of benign apocrine breast cyst without concurrent gynecomastia in a 41-year-old male. Diagnostic evaluation and management are discussed, along with a review of the literature. Given the extreme rarity of benign breast cysts in males, a thorough investigation is essential in male patients presenting with cystic breast lesions. Diagnostic breast imaging may be challenging. Surgical resection of the cyst should be considered in the presence of atypical imaging features to exclude underlying malignancy.

A Prospective Evaluation of Tru-Cut Biopsy and Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology in Male Breast Cancer Detection

BACKGROUND

Male breast-cancer (MBC) is often diagnosed late. Our purpose was to evaluate fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) versus Tru-Cut biopsy (TCNB) in MBC diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men with suspicious breast lesions were prospectively enrolled; 54 met the inclusion criteria and underwent FNAC and TCNB. FNAC, TCNB and gold-standard results were compared.

RESULTS

Unsatisfactory results were 11.1% after FNAC and none after TCNB (p=0.027). After gold-standard evaluation, the diagnosis of FNAC and TCNB was confirmed, respectively, in 63.0% and 98.1% and changed in 37.0% and 1.9% (p<0.001). The malignancy rate after FNAC, TCNB and surgery were, respectively, 25.9%, 33.3% and 35.1% (FNAC vs. TCNB p=0.5276, FNAC vs. surgery p=0.404; TCNB vs. surgery p=1). Among invasive carcinomas, 93.8% were identified by FNAC vs. 87.5% by TCNB (p=1); all ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were detected after TCNB and none after FNAC (p=0.1).

CONCLUSION

FNAC leads to a significantly higher number of inadequate samplings and seems to be subject to increased DCIS misdiagnoses. TCNB correlated better to the final histological report.

Unusual Male Breast Lesions

Most of male breast masses are benign with gynecomastia being the most common entity encountered. Primary male breast cancer accounts for less than 1% of the total number of breast cancer. Male breast can be affected by a variety of conditions affecting the female breast with less frequency due to the lack of hormonal influence and consequent glandular sub-development. Imaging features of male breast masses are quite similar to the female breast. Therefore, using the knowledge of the female breast and applying it may help in the diagnosis and management of male breast abnormalities. In this article, we aim to review a variety of unusual male breast masses. We discuss the demographics of male breast tumors, describe the diagnostic algorithm for evaluating male breast masses, and review the imaging features of rare breast masses and mimickers of male breast cancer.

An Approach Based on Mammographic Imaging and Radiomics for Distinguishing Male Benign and Malignant Lesions: A Preliminary Study

Purpose

To develop and validate an imaging-radiomics model for the diagnosis of male benign and malignant breast lesions.

Methods

Ninety male patients who underwent preoperative mammography from January 2011 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study (63 in the training cohort and 27 in the validation cohort). The region of interest was segmented into a mediolateral oblique view, and 104 radiomics features were extracted. The minimum redundancy and maximum relevance (mRMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) methods were used to exclude radiomics features to establish the radiomics score (rad-score). Mammographic features were evaluated by two radiologists. Univariate logistic regression was used to select for imaging features, and multivariate logistic regression was used to construct an imaging model. An imaging-radiomics model was eventually established, and a nomogram was developed based on the imaging-radiomics model. Area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied to assess the clinical value.

Results

The AUC based on the imaging model in the validation cohort was 0.760, the sensitivity was 0.750, and the specificity was 0.727. The AUC, sensitivity and specificity based on the radiomics in the validation cohort were 0.820, 0.750, and 0.867, respectively. The imaging-radiomics model was better than the imaging and radiomics models; the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the imaging-radiomics model in the validation cohort were 0.870, 0.824, and 0.900, respectively.

Conclusion

The imaging-radiomics model created by the imaging characteristics and radiomics features exhibited a favorable discriminatory ability for male breast cancer.

Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant male breast lesions in mammography

PURPOSE

To investigate the mammographic characteristics in discriminating benign and malignant male breast lesions.

METHODS

Male patients with breast lesions detected by preoperative mammography were enrolled in this study from Jan 2011 to Dec 2018. All lesions were confirmed by biopsy and classified into benign group or malignant group. Imaging features included lesions location, lesion type, lesion density, lesion eccentricity, accompanying signs(calcification, nipple retraction, thickened skin and enlarged lymph nodes) were recorded and analysed by statistical methods. The AUC was calculated to assess their diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions. This model was further validated by 0.632 bootstrap.

RESULTS

A total of 93 men(median age: 60, range 32-81 years) were enrolled, 43 patients in the benign group and 50 patients in the malignant group. In the univariate logistic analysis, age, lesion location, lesion type, lesion density, lesion eccentricity, calcification, nipple retraction and skin thickening were significantly different (p < 0.05). When the lesion showed a mass in mammography, those with a circumscribed margin were likely malignant (p < 0.05). In the multivariate logistic analysis, non-retro-areola lesions (OR: 6.900, 95 % CI: 1.413∼33.691, p < 0.05), eccentric lesions (OR: 14.566, 95 % CI: 2.800∼75.777, p < 0.05), high-density lesions (OR: 11.052, 95 % CI: 2.235∼54.666, p < 0.05), calcification (OR: 12.715 95 % CI: 1.316∼122.848, p < 0.05) and nipple retraction (OR: 24.681, 95 % CI: 2.853∼213.542 p < 0.05) were associated with breast cancer. Those variables were used to build logistic model and the AUC of the imaging model was 0.904. The imaging model was verified by 0.632 bootstrap resampling, and the AUC after 0.632 bootstrap was 0.892.

CONCLUSION

Mammographic characteristics could contribute to distinguishing malignant and benign male breast lesions, and the imaging model showed excellent diagnostic performance, which may help to guide clinical decision-making.

Multimodality approach to the nipple-areolar complex: a pictorial review and diagnostic algorithm

The anatomic and histologic characteristics of the nipple-areolar complex make this breast region special. The nipple-areolar complex can be affected by abnormal development and a wide spectrum of pathological conditions, many of which have unspecific clinical and radiological presentations that can present a challenge for radiologists. The nipple-areolar complex requires a specific imaging workup in which a multimodal approach is essential. Radiologists need to know the different imaging modalities used to study the nipple-areolar complex, as well as their advantages and limitations. It is essential to get acquainted with the acquisition technique for each modality and the spectrum of findings for the different conditions. This review describes and illustrates a combined clinical and radiological approach to evaluate the nipple-areolar complex, emphasizing the findings for the normal morphology, developmental abnormalities, and the most common benign and malignant diseases that can affect this region. We also present a diagnostic algorithm that enables a rapid, practical approach to diagnosing condition involving the nipple-areolar complex.

Imaging of male breast disease: the good, the bad and the ugly - A pictorial review

The male breast is affected by a broad spectrum of conditions, ranging from benign to malignant, many of which are similar to those occurring in its female counterpart. Despite the challenge motivated by different imaging characteristic features, correct imaging interpretation in male breast disease may aid at differentiation between benign and suspected conditions, narrow the differential diagnosis and guide subsequent management. The purpose of this review is to showcase a wide array of male breast diseases, discuss their imaging presentations and key features for diagnosis.

Radiologic and Pathologic Findings of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia in the Male Breast: Case Report and Literature Review

In this case report, we present the radiologic and pathologic findings of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in the male breast. It is well known that a high-risk lesion such as ADH is a precursor of breast cancer in females. However, the clinical significance of these lesions in the male breast is still uncertain because male breasts mainly consist of ducts without lobule formation, unlike the female breast. To our knowledge, imaging findings of ADH in the male breast have not been reported previously, except for a few studies on the pathologic findings of these lesions. Through this paper, we would like to present the possible imaging features of this high-risk lesion in the male breast and review the related literature.

A case report of a mammary myofibroblastoma in a male and literature review of radiologic and pathologic features of breast myofibroblastoma

We reported a 65-year-old male with a benign mammary myofibroblastoma. This report shows that not all masses of male breast are malignant. To differentiate benign masses from malignant neoplasms, careful preoperative diagnosis should be performed. Preoperative diagnosis of the tumor prevents placing a huge financial and mental burdens on patients.

Breast hemangioma in a male patient: Report of a case

Breast hemangioma is a rare benign tumor in female and extremely rare in males. They are part of vascular tumors. Here, we described the case of a male patient who had a breast hemangioma for 30 years that was diagnosed incidentally in a thorax and abdomen tomography. We briefly review epidemiology, histopathology, clinical, and imaging findings related to breast hemangioma.

Ultrasonographic and Mammographic Findings of Male Breast Disease

Most male breast diseases are benign, although malignancies can also occur. Gynecomastia, the most common abnormality in the male breast, has characteristic imaging findings differentiating it from cancer. Fewer than 1% of patients with breast cancer are men, but the incidence of male breast cancer is increasing worldwide. Additionally, breast cancer often presents at a more advanced stage in men than in women due to delayed diagnosis. Understanding imaging features of male breast disease is important for an accurate diagnosis and optimal care. This article reviews ultrasonography and mammography findings of benign and malignant diseases of the male breast.

Multimodality images of myofibroblastoma in the male breast: A case report and a review of the literature

We report a case of a 58-year-old male diagnosed with myofibroblastoma using mammography, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as present a review of the literature. The pathological diagnosis was myofibroblastoma with spindle cell neoplasm with immunoreactivity. Myofibroblastoma is a rare benign disease and there is a lack of reports of multimodality imaging of this disease. We review the imaging features of this rare disease across multiple imaging modalities with pathological correlation, and provide current treatment recommendations as well.

Encapsulated Papillary Carcinoma in A Man with Gynecomastia: Ultrasonography, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features with Pathologic Correlation

Male breast cancer is an uncommon disease that constitutes 1% of all breast cancers and encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) is a rare subtype of malignant male diseases. Gynecomastia is the most common disease of the male breast. We report a 63-year-old male patient with EPC accompanied by gynecomastia that was diagnosed and treated at our breast center. Mammography showed an oval-shaped dense mass with circumscribed margins on the ground of nodular gynecomastia. On ultrasonographic exam, we saw a well-circumscribed complex mass with a solid component which was vascular on Doppler ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a complex cystic mass containing solid components. Dynamic images showed enhancement of the cystic mass wall and mural components. Tumor stage was evaluated as T2N0. The lesion's histologic examination and immunohistochemical analysis by showing no myoepithelial layer revealed an encapsulated papillary carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is the first case report which describes MR imaging findings of male breast encapsulated papillary cancer.

Clinical and ultrasonographic features of male breast tumors: A retrospective analysis

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of male breast tumors.

Methods

The medical records of male patients with breast lesions were retrieved from an electronic medical record database and a pathology database and retrospectively reviewed. A total of 112 men (125 breast masses) with preoperative breast ultrasonography (US) were included (median age, 59.50 years; age range, 15–96 years). Data extracted included patient age, if the lesions were bilateral, palpable, and tender, and the presence of nipple discharge. Breast lesion features on static US images were reviewed by three experienced radiologists without knowledge of physical examination or pathology results, original breast US image interpretations, or surgical outcomes. The US features were documented according to the BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) US lexicons. A forth radiologist compiled the data for analysis.

Results

Of the 125 breast masses, palpable tender lumps and bilateral synchronous masses were more likely to be benign than malignant (both, 100% vs 0%, P < 0.05). Advanced age and bloody discharge from nipples were common in malignant lesions (P <0.05). A mass eccentric to a nipple, irregular shape, the presence of an echogenic halo, predominantly internal vascularity, and rich color flow signal on color Doppler ultrasound were significantly related to malignancy (all, P < 0.05). An echogenic halo and the presence of rich color flow signal were independent predictors of malignancy.

Conclusion

Specific clinical and US characteristics of male breast tumors may help guide treatment, and determine if surgery or conservative treatment is preferable.

The unusual suspects: A review of unusual benign and malignant male breast imaging cases

Male breast disease is uncommon. Men presenting with breast symptoms may represent unique diagnostic challenges for the radiologist, particularly if imaging findings are not classic for gynecomastia or carcinoma. In this paper we review 10 unusual male breast cases, 5 benign and 5 malignant, including the radiologic findings, differential diagnosis, pathology and management.

Ultrasonographic assessment of male breast diseases

Although rare and accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers, the incidence of breast cancer in men has increased by 26% over the past few decades. Very little has been reported on the sonographic appearance of benign and malignant male breast conditions. The aim of this study was to describe the ultrasonographic features of male breast disease and the value of ultrasound in the evaluation of male breast disease. Between December 2006 and October 2014, ultrasound examinations were performed in 560 male patients presenting with enlargement of, pain in, and/or a lump in the breast. One hundred and thirty-six patients (24.3%) underwent surgical excision, and 424 patients (75.7%) were diagnosed by ultrasound. Their ultrasonographic features were retrospectively evaluated. The final diagnoses were gynecomastia (n = 537), primary breast cancer (n = 9), lipoma (n = 7), chronic mastitis (n = 6), and fibroadenoma (n = 1). Of the 560 lesions, 356 (63.6%) were classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 2, 191 (34.1%) were classified as BI-RADS category 3, and 13 (2.3%) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the detection of malignant breast masses according to ultrasound were 100%, 99.3%, 69.2%, 100%, and 97.7% respectively. The sonographic patterns of gynecomastia were nodular (n = 131, 24.4%), dendritic (n = 50, 9.3%), and diffuse glandular (n = 356, 66.3%). Color Doppler flow imaging revealed hypervascularity in five of these malignant masses, moderate vascularity in two of the masses, and mild vascularity in the remaining two masses. Other diseases included in the study are also described. Ultrasonography (US) is useful in the diagnosis of male breast diseases, especially in differentiating cancer from benign lesions.

Breast imaging in patients with nipple discharge

Nipple discharge is a common symptom in clinical practice, representing the third leading breast complaint, after pain and lumps. It is usually limited and has a benign etiology. The risk of malignancy is higher when the discharge is uniductal, unilateral, spontaneous, persistent, bloody, or serous, as well as when it is accompanied by a breast mass. The most common causes of pathologic nipple discharge are papilloma and ductal ectasia. However, there is a 5% risk of malignancy, mainly ductal carcinoma in situ. The clinical examination is an essential part of the patient evaluation, allowing benign nipple discharge to be distinguished from suspicious nipple discharge, which calls for imaging. Mammography and ultrasound should be used together as first-line imaging methods. However, mammography has low sensitivity in cases of nipple discharge, because, typically, the lesions are small, are retroareolar, and contain no calcifications. Because the reported sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, it is important to use the correct technique to search for intraductal lesions in the retroareolar region. Recent studies recommend the use of magnetic resonance imaging in cases of suspicious nipple discharge in which the mammography and ultrasound findings are normal. The most common magnetic resonance imaging finding is non-mass enhancement. Surgery is no longer the only solution for patients with suspicious nipple discharge, because short-time follow-up can be safely proposed.

Spectrum of the Breast Lesions With Increased 18F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT

Interpretation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies in breast is challenging owing to nonspecific FDG uptake in various benign and malignant conditions. Benign conditions include breast changes in pregnancy and lactation, gynecomastia, mastitis, fat necrosis, fibroadenoma, intraductal papilloma, and atypical ductal hyperplasia. Among malignancies, invasive ductal carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma are common histological types of breast carcinoma. Rarely, other unusual histological types of breast carcinomas (eg, intraductal papillary carcinoma, invasive micropapillary carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and metaplastic carcinoma), lymphoma, and metastasis can be the causes. Knowledge of a wide spectrum of hypermetabolic breast lesions on FDG PET/CT is essential in accurate reading of FDG PET/CT. The purpose of this atlas article is to demonstrate features of various breast lesions encountered at our institution, both benign and malignant, which can result in hypermetabolism on FDG PET/CT imaging.

Male Breast Carcinoma: A Clinical and Pathological Review

Male breast carcinomas (MBCs) are rare neoplasms that account for 0.1% of all male cancers. Still, there are 2000 new cases of MCB diagnosed annually in the United States. Because of its rarity, data regarding the etiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of MBC are limited. MBC shares some similarities with female breast carcinoma (FBC). This review will address the important clinical, histopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular features, genetics, management, and prognosis of MBC.

Male Breast: Clinical and Imaging Evaluations of Benign and Malignant Entities with Histologic Correlation

Breast cancer is an uncommon disease in men. As a result, the diagnosis may not initially be considered. Understanding the common benign and malignant entities affecting the male breast is critical for timely and accurate diagnosis in the primary care setting. Most patients present with a palpable breast mass or pain. The usual etiology is gynecomastia, the most common breast condition in males, but breast cancer must always be excluded through careful imaging evaluation when physical examination findings are suspicious or inconclusive. Imaging of the male breast generally relies on mammography and ultrasound, with mammography employed as the initial imaging modality of choice and ultrasound when a mass is detected or suspected. Here we describe the normal male breast anatomy and present an evaluation algorithm for the male patient with breast signs or symptoms. The most common benign and malignant entities are described.

Radiologic evaluation of lumps in the male breast

BACKGROUND

Gynecomastia has a typical appearance on mammography, and occurs frequently in men. However, imaging is often performed on men with breast lumps to exclude breast cancer, which only comprises 1% of male breast masses.

PURPOSE

To assess whether ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) are necessary investigations when mammograms show classical gynecomastia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have retrospectively collected data on male patients referred for mammography during the period 2011-2013 (a total of 539 patients). All radiological images were re-read, and descriptions of ultrasound images were reviewed. Clinical information supplied with the original referrals was assessed, along with pathology and cytology reports.

RESULTS

Among the 539 male patients who underwent mammography, 483 were also examined with ultrasound, and 335 were further evaluated with FNAC. Mammograms showed gynecomastia in 350 patients, and among these subjects ultrasound was performed in 340 (97%), FNAC in 261 (75%), and core biopsies in four (1%) patients. The diagnosis gynecomastia was unchanged in all patients who underwent FNAC or biopsy. Malignant tumors were found in eight patients, six of which were invasive ductal carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

In patients with a classical appearance of gynecomastia on mammography, supplemental ultrasound, FNAC, or biopsy is superfluous and contributes to unnecessary costs.

Invasive lobular carcinoma: a rare presentation in the male breast

Breast cancer in men is uncommon, accounting for <1% of all breast cancers. Even though lobular structures are quite infrequent in the male breast, rare cases of invasive lobular breast carcinoma have been described, representing 1-2% of all breast cancers in men. Risk factors include undescended testes, congenital inguinal hernia, orchiectomy, orchitis, testicular injury, infertility and Klinefelter's syndrome, previous thoracic radiotherapy, alterations of the oestrogen-testosterone ratio and familial history (BRCA 2 and 1). The authors present a case of a 52-year-old man with no relevant predisposing factors to breast cancer, who presented with a painless, firm nodule, fixed to the nipple on the left breast, associated with nipple retraction and ulceration, and fully characterised by mammogram and ultrasound. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed the diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma and the patient underwent left radical mastectomy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonotherapy. A brief review of the literature is presented.

Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia of the Breast: Multimodality Review With Pathologic Correlation

Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) is a rare benign breast condition. PASH is thought to be hormonally responsive, and it is usually identified in premenopausal and perimenopausal women. PASH may also be seen in postmenopausal woman on hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Approximately 53% of patients with PASH present with abnormalities on screening mammography, and 44% of patients with PASH present with palpable abnormalities. On imaging studies, PASH appears similar to fibroadenomas. On mammography, PASH is usually seen as a noncalcified, circumscribed mass. On ultrasound, PASH often appears as an oval, circumscribed, hypoechoic mass. On magnetic resonance imaging, PASH usually has progressive (Type 1) enhancement, and high-signal slit-like spaces may be seen on T2-weighted and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images. The slit-like spaces correspond to empty clefts within acellular hyalinized stroma on histopathology. PASH may be mistaken for a low-grade angiosarcoma on pathologic examination. While angiosarcoma has true vascular spaces, PASH has a network of pseudoangiomatous slit-like clefts. Women with biopsy-proven PASH usually undergo follow-up imaging. Surgical excision may be considered for larger lesions and in women at an increased risk for developing breast cancer. In the future, additional studies are needed to provide definitive data regarding appropriate management and long-term outcomes for women with PASH. PASH has become increasingly recognized, but the literature regarding the imaging features of PASH is scarce. This paper reviews the imaging and pathologic features of PASH and some processes that may simulate PASH are discussed. Features of PASH on mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and nuclear medicine studies are discussed with pathologic correlation.

Ultrasound of pediatric breast masses: what to do with lumps and bumps

The approach to breast masses in children differs from that in adults in many ways, including the differential diagnostic considerations, imaging algorithm and appropriateness of biopsy as a means of further characterization. Most pediatric breast masses are benign, either related to breast development or benign neoplastic processes. Biopsy is rarely needed and can damage the developing breast; thus radiologists must be familiar with the imaging appearance of common entities so that biopsies are judiciously recommended. The purpose of this article is to describe the imaging appearances of the normally developing pediatric breast as well as illustrate the imaging findings of a spectrum of diseases, including those that are benign (fibroadenoma, juvenile papillomatosis, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, gynecomastia, abscess and fat necrosis), malignant (breast carcinoma and metastases), and have variable malignant potential (phyllodes tumor).

Mammography Findings of Male Breast Diseases

Over the past 2 decades, the percentage of men presenting with breast complaints has increased from 0.8% to 2.4%, and men now account for 1% of all breast cancer cases. The most common male breast mass is gynecomastia, followed by lipoma and epidermal inclusion cysts. Because there is a paucity of parenchyma as compared with the female breast, the malignancy rapidly progresses to the next stage, with the appearance of secondary signs like nipple retraction, fixation to deeper tissues, skin ulceration or adenopathy. Diagnostic evaluation is needed only when the palpable mass is unilateral, hard, fixed, peripheral to the nipple, or associated with nipple discharge, skin changes, or lymphadenopathy. Male breast cancer usually occurs in a subareolar location or is positioned eccentric to the nipple; occasionally, it occurs in a peripheral position. Secondary signs like skin thickening, nipple retraction, and axillary lymphadenopathy may be seen. Microcalcifications can occur. Mammography can accurately distinguish between malignant and benign male breast disease. Radiologists are generally less familiar with breast disease in males compared with females. In this article, we discuss the clinical, and mammographic features of a variety of benign and malignant diseases that can occur in the male breast.