1
|
Gheyath B, Chau E, Latif S, Smith TW. The Interventional Imager: How Do We Train the Next Interventional Imagers? Interv Cardiol Clin 2024; 13:29-38. [PMID: 37980065 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
With the increase in structural heart procedural volume, interventional imagers are required. Multiple imaging modalities exist to guide these procedures. With comprehensive understanding of pathology, anatomy, and procedures, an advanced imager plays an important role in the heart team. Imaging training is part of general cardiology fellowship. Current structures do not provide adequate procedural time to fill the role. Interested graduates pursue advanced training by either focusing on echocardiography and procedural imaging or multidetector computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance. This yields individuals with different expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashaer Gheyath
- Department of Imaging, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Taper, A238, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. https://twitter.com/bgheyath
| | - Edward Chau
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4680 Y Street, Suite 2820, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| | - Syed Latif
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Sutter Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Thomas W Smith
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4680 Y Street, Suite 2820, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim Y, Choi AD, Telluri A, Lipkin I, Bradley AJ, Sidahmed A, Jonas R, Andreini D, Bathina R, Baggiano A, Cerci R, Choi EY, Choi JH, Choi SY, Chung N, Cole J, Doh JH, Ha SJ, Her AY, Kepka C, Kim JY, Kim JW, Kim SW, Kim W, Pontone G, Villines TC, Cho I, Danad I, Heo R, Lee SE, Lee JH, Park HB, Sung JM, Crabtree T, Earls JP, Min JK, Chang HJ. Atherosclerosis Imaging Quantitative Computed Tomography (AI-QCT) to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography in the randomized controlled CONSERVE trial. Clin Cardiol 2023; 46:477-483. [PMID: 36847047 PMCID: PMC10189079 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS We compared diagnostic performance, costs, and association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of clinical coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) interpretation versus semiautomated approach that use artificial intelligence and machine learning for atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography (AI-QCT) for patients being referred for nonemergent invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS CCTA data from individuals enrolled into the randomized controlled Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization trial for an American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline indication for ICA were analyzed. Site interpretation of CCTAs were compared to those analyzed by a cloud-based software (Cleerly, Inc.) that performs AI-QCT for stenosis determination, coronary vascular measurements and quantification and characterization of atherosclerotic plaque. CCTA interpretation and AI-QCT guided findings were related to MACE at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS Seven hundred forty-seven stable patients (60 ± 12.2 years, 49% women) were included. Using AI-QCT, 9% of patients had no CAD compared with 34% for clinical CCTA interpretation. Application of AI-QCT to identify obstructive coronary stenosis at the ≥50% and ≥70% threshold would have reduced ICA by 87% and 95%, respectively. Clinical outcomes for patients without AI-QCT-identified obstructive stenosis was excellent; for 78% of patients with maximum stenosis < 50%, no cardiovascular death or acute myocardial infarction occurred. When applying an AI-QCT referral management approach to avoid ICA in patients with <50% or <70% stenosis, overall costs were reduced by 26% and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In stable patients referred for ACC/AHA guideline-indicated nonemergent ICA, application of artificial intelligence and machine learning for AI-QCT can significantly reduce ICA rates and costs with no change in 1-year MACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumin Kim
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Andrew D Choi
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Anha Telluri
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Isabella Lipkin
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Andrew J Bradley
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Alfateh Sidahmed
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Rebecca Jonas
- Jefferson Medical Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Ravi Bathina
- CARE Hospital and FACTS Foundation, Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | | | | | - So-Yeon Choi
- Ajou University Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Namsik Chung
- Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jason Cole
- Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Mobile, Alabama, USA
| | - Joon-Hyung Doh
- Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Sang-Jin Ha
- Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangwon-do, South Korea
| | - Ae-Young Her
- Kangwon National University Hospital, Gangwon-do, South Korea
| | - Cezary Kepka
- National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Jin Won Kim
- Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Woong Kim
- Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | | | - Todd C Villines
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Iksung Cho
- Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Ran Heo
- Hanyang University, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang-Eun Lee
- Myongji Hospital, Seonam University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Lee
- Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyung-Bok Park
- Myongji Hospital, Seonam University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.,International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Ji-Min Sung
- Jefferson Medical Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - James P Earls
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,Cleerly Inc, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Hyuk-Jae Chang
- Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma Y, Liu C, Cao S, Chen T, Chen G. Microfluidics for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. J Mater Chem B 2023; 11:546-559. [PMID: 36542463 DOI: 10.1039/d2tb02287g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), a type of circulatory system disease related to the lesions of the cardiovascular system, has become one of the main diseases that endanger human health. Currently, the clinical diagnosis of most CVDs relies on a combination of imaging technology and blood biochemical test. However, the existing technologies for diagnosis of CVDs still have limitations in terms of specificity, detection range, and cost. In order to break through the current bottleneck, microfluidic with the advantages of low cost, simple instruments and easy integration, has been developed to play an important role in the early prevention, diagnosis and treatment of CVDs. Here, we have reviewed the recent various applications of microfluidic in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CVDs, including microfluidic devices for detecting CVD markers, the cardiovascular models based on microfluidic, and the microfluidic used for CVDs drug screening and delivery. In addition, we have briefly looked forward to the prospects and challenges of microfluidics in diagnosis and treatment of CVDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonggeng Ma
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P. R. China.
| | - Chenbin Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, P. R. China
| | - Siyu Cao
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P. R. China.
| | - Tianshu Chen
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, P. R. China.
| | - Guifang Chen
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, Budoff M, Chinnaiyan K, Choi AD, Ghoshhajra B, Jacobs J, Koweek L, Lesser J, Maroules C, Rubin GD, Rybicki FJ, Shaw LJ, Williams MC, Williamson E, White CS, Villines TC, Blankstein R. CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 15:1974-2001. [PMID: 36115815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was created to standardize reporting system for patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and to guide possible next steps in patient management. The goal of this updated 2022 CAD-RADS 2.0 is to improve the initial reporting system for CCTA by considering new technical developments in cardiac CT, including data from recent clinical trials and new clinical guidelines. The updated CAD-RADS classification will follow an established framework of stenosis, plaque burden, and modifiers, which will include assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using CT fractional-flow-reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), when performed. Similar to the method used in the original CAD-RADS version, the determinant for stenosis severity classification will be the most severe coronary artery luminal stenosis on a per-patient basis, ranging from CAD-RADS 0 (zero) for absence of any plaque or stenosis to CAD-RADS 5 indicating the presence of at least one totally occluded coronary artery. Given the increasing data supporting the prognostic relevance of coronary plaque burden, this document will provide various methods to estimate and report total plaque burden. The addition of P1 to P4 descriptors are used to denote increasing categories of plaque burden. The main goal of CAD-RADS, which should always be interpreted together with the impression found in the report, remains to facilitate communication of test results with referring physicians along with suggestions for subsequent patient management. In addition, CAD-RADS will continue to provide a framework of standardization that may benefit education, research, peer-review, artificial intelligence development, clinical trial design, population health and quality assurance with the ultimate goal of improving patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo C Cury
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute and Baptist Health of South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
| | - Jonathon Leipsic
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Suhny Abbara
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Cardiology, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniel Berman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marcio Bittencourt
- Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew Budoff
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Andrew D Choi
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brian Ghoshhajra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill Jacobs
- NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lynne Koweek
- Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - John Lesser
- Division of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey D Rubin
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Frank J Rybicki
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Leslee J Shaw
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Eric Williamson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Todd C Villines
- Division of Cardiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, Budoff M, Chinnaiyan K, Choi AD, Ghoshhajra B, Jacobs J, Koweek L, Lesser J, Maroules C, Rubin GD, Rybicki FJ, Shaw LJ, Williams MC, Williamson E, White CS, Villines TC, Blankstein R. CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System.: An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:1185-1212. [PMID: 36436841 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was created to standardize reporting system for patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and to guide possible next steps in patient management. The goal of this updated 2022 CAD-RADS 2.0 is to improve the initial reporting system for CCTA by considering new technical developments in Cardiac CT, including data from recent clinical trials and new clinical guidelines. The updated CAD-RADS classification will follow an established framework of stenosis, plaque burden, and modifiers, which will include assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using CT fractional-flow-reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), when performed. Similar to the method used in the original CAD-RADS version, the determinant for stenosis severity classification will be the most severe coronary artery luminal stenosis on a per-patient basis, ranging from CAD-RADS 0 (zero) for absence of any plaque or stenosis to CAD-RADS 5 indicating the presence of at least one totally occluded coronary artery. Given the increasing data supporting the prognostic relevance of coronary plaque burden, this document will provide various methods to estimate and report total plaque burden. The addition of P1 to P4 descriptors are used to denote increasing categories of plaque burden. The main goal of CAD-RADS, which should always be interpreted together with the impression found in the report, remains to facilitate communication of test results with referring physicians along with suggestions for subsequent patient management. In addition, CAD-RADS will continue to provide a framework of standardization that may benefit education, research, peer-review, artificial intelligence development, clinical trial design, population health and quality assurance with the ultimate goal of improving patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo C Cury
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute and Baptist Health of South Florida, 8900 N Kendall Drive, Miami FL, 33176, USA.
| | - Jonathon Leipsic
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Suhny Abbara
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Cardiology, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Matthew Budoff
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew D Choi
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brian Ghoshhajra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill Jacobs
- NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynne Koweek
- Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John Lesser
- Division of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey D Rubin
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Frank J Rybicki
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Leslee J Shaw
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Todd C Villines
- Division of Cardiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, Budoff M, Chinnaiyan K, Choi AD, Ghoshhajra B, Jacobs J, Koweek L, Lesser J, Maroules C, Rubin GD, Rybicki FJ, Shaw LJ, Williams MC, Williamson E, White CS, Villines TC, Blankstein R. CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2022; 16:536-557. [PMID: 35864070 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was created to standardize reporting system for patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and to guide possible next steps in patient management. The goal of this updated 2022 CAD-RADS 2.0 is to improve the initial reporting system for CCTA by considering new technical developments in Cardiac CT, including data from recent clinical trials and new clinical guidelines. The updated CAD-RADS classification will follow an established framework of stenosis, plaque burden, and modifiers, which will include assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using CT fractional-flow-reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), when performed. Similar to the method used in the original CAD-RADS version, the determinant for stenosis severity classification will be the most severe coronary artery luminal stenosis on a per-patient basis, ranging from CAD-RADS 0 (zero) for absence of any plaque or stenosis to CAD-RADS 5 indicating the presence of at least one totally occluded coronary artery. Given the increasing data supporting the prognostic relevance of coronary plaque burden, this document will provide various methods to estimate and report total plaque burden. The addition of P1 to P4 descriptors are used to denote increasing categories of plaque burden. The main goal of CAD-RADS, which should always be interpreted together with the impression found in the report, remains to facilitate communication of test results with referring physicians along with suggestions for subsequent patient management. In addition, CAD-RADS will continue to provide a framework of standardization that may benefit education, research, peer-review, artificial intelligence development, clinical trial design, population health and quality assurance with the ultimate goal of improving patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo C Cury
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute and Baptist Health of South Florida, Miami FL, USA.
| | - Jonathon Leipsic
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Suhny Abbara
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Cardiology, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Matthew Budoff
- David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew D Choi
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brian Ghoshhajra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill Jacobs
- NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynne Koweek
- Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John Lesser
- Division of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Geoffrey D Rubin
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Frank J Rybicki
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Leslee J Shaw
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Todd C Villines
- Division of Cardiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, Budoff M, Chinnaiyan K, Choi AD, Ghoshhajra B, Jacobs J, Koweek L, Lesser J, Maroules C, Rubin GD, Rybicki FJ, Shaw LJ, Williams MC, Williamson E, White CS, Villines TC, Blankstein R. CAD-RADS™ 2.0 - 2022 Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2022; 4:e220183. [PMID: 36339062 PMCID: PMC9627235 DOI: 10.1148/ryct.220183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was created to standardize reporting system for patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and to guide possible next steps in patient management. The goal of this updated 2022 CAD-RADS 2.0 is to improve the initial reporting system for CCTA by considering new technical developments in Cardiac CT, including data from recent clinical trials and new clinical guidelines. The updated CAD-RADS classification will follow an established framework of stenosis, plaque burden, and modifiers, which will include assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using CT fractional-flow-reserve (CT-FFR) or myocardial CT perfusion (CTP), when performed. Similar to the method used in the original CAD-RADS version, the determinant for stenosis severity classification will be the most severe coronary artery luminal stenosis on a per-patient basis, ranging from CAD-RADS 0 (zero) for absence of any plaque or stenosis to CAD-RADS 5 indicating the presence of at least one totally occluded coronary artery. Given the increasing data supporting the prognostic relevance of coronary plaque burden, this document will provide various methods to estimate and report total plaque burden. The addition of P1 to P4 descriptors are used to denote increasing categories of plaque burden. The main goal of CAD-RADS, which should always be interpreted together with the impression found in the report, remains to facilitate communication of test results with referring physicians along with suggestions for subsequent patient management. In addition, CAD-RADS will continue to provide a framework of standardization that may benefit education, research, peer-review, artificial intelligence development, clinical trial design, population health and quality assurance with the ultimate goal of improving patient care. Keywords: Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary CTA, CAD-RADS, Reporting and Data System, Stenosis Severity, Report Standardization Terminology, Plaque Burden, Ischemia Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is published synchronously in Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, Journal of the American College of Radiology, and International Journal for Cardiovascular Imaging. © 2022 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by RSNA with permission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo C. Cury
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute and Baptist Health of South
Florida, 8900 N Kendall Drive, Miami FL, 33176, USA
| | | | - Suhny Abbara
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX,
USA
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Department of Cardiology,
Ulmenweg 18, 90154, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew D. Choi
- The George Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Jill Jacobs
- NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016,
USA
| | | | - John Lesser
- Division of Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute, USA
| | | | | | - Frank J. Rybicki
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of
Medicine, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Todd C. Villines
- Division of Cardiology, University of Virginia Health System,
USA
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Keeping Up with Cardiac CT: A Call to Action for Cardiology Fellowship Training. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2022; 16:355-357. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
9
|
Han X, Luo N, Xu L, Cao J, Guo N, He Y, Hong M, Jia X, Wang Z, Yang Z. Artificial intelligence stenosis diagnosis in coronary CTA: effect on the performance and consistency of readers with less cardiovascular experience. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:28. [PMID: 35177029 PMCID: PMC8851787 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00756-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) based on deep learning on the diagnostic performance and consistency of inexperienced cardiovascular radiologists. Methods We enrolled 196 patents who had undergone both coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 6 months. Four readers with less cardiovascular experience (Reader 1–Reader 4) and two cardiovascular radiologists (level II, Reader 5 and Reader 6) evaluated all images for ≥ 50% coronary artery stenosis, with ICA as the gold standard. Reader 3 and Reader 4 interpreted with AI system assistance, and the other four readers interpreted without the AI system. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)) of the six readers were calculated at the patient and vessel levels. Additionally, we evaluated the interobserver consistency between Reader 1 and Reader 2, Reader 3 and Reader 4, and Reader 5 and Reader 6. Results The AI system had 94% and 78% sensitivity at the patient and vessel levels, respectively, which were higher than that of Reader 5 and Reader 6. AI-assisted Reader 3 and Reader 4 had higher sensitivity (range + 7.2–+ 16.6% and + 5.9–+ 16.1%, respectively) and NPVs (range + 3.7–+ 13.4% and + 2.7–+ 4.2%, respectively) than Reader 1 and Reader 2 without AI. Good interobserver consistency was found between Reader 3 and Reader 4 in interpreting ≥ 50% stenosis (Kappa value = 0.75 and 0.80 at the patient and vessel levels, respectively). Only Reader 1 and Reader 2 showed poor interobserver consistency (Kappa value = 0.25 and 0.37). Reader 5 and Reader 6 showed moderate agreement (Kappa value = 0.55 and 0.61). Conclusions Our study showed that using AI could effectively increase the sensitivity of inexperienced readers and significantly improve the consistency of coronary stenosis diagnosis via CCTA. Trial registration Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1900021867. Name of registry: Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of coronary atherosclerotic stenosis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00756-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianjun Han
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 YongAn Road, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Luo
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 YongAn Road, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Lixue Xu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 YongAn Road, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiaxin Cao
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 YongAn Road, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Guo
- Shukun (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Jinhui Bd, Qiyang Rd, Beijing, 100102, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi He
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 YongAn Road, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Hong
- Department of Computer Software Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, South Korea
| | - Xibin Jia
- Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenchang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 YongAn Road, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenghan Yang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 YongAn Road, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|