Multiple receptor activation elicits synergistic IP formation in nonpigmented ciliary body epithelial cells

Synergistic Ca2+ responses by G{alpha}i- and G{alpha}q-coupled G-protein-coupled receptors require a single PLC{beta} isoform that is sensitive to both G{beta}{gamma} and G{alpha}q

Cross-talk between Gα(i)- and Gα(q)-linked G-protein-coupled receptors yields synergistic Ca(2+) responses in a variety of cell types. Prior studies have shown that synergistic Ca(2+) responses from macrophage G-protein-coupled receptors are primarily dependent on phospholipase Cβ3 (PLCβ3), with a possible contribution of PLCβ2, whereas signaling through PLCβ4 interferes with synergy. We here show that synergy can be induced by the combination of Gβγ and Gα(q) activation of a single PLCβ isoform. Synergy was absent in macrophages lacking both PLCβ2 and PLCβ3, but it was fully reconstituted following transduction with PLCβ3 alone. Mechanisms of PLCβ-mediated synergy were further explored in NIH-3T3 cells, which express little if any PLCβ2. RNAi-mediated knockdown of endogenous PLCβs demonstrated that synergy in these cells was dependent on PLCβ3, but PLCβ1 and PLCβ4 did not contribute, and overexpression of either isoform inhibited Ca(2+) synergy. When synergy was blocked by RNAi of endogenous PLCβ3, it could be reconstituted by expression of either human PLCβ3 or mouse PLCβ2. In contrast, it could not be reconstituted by human PLCβ3 with a mutation of the Y box, which disrupted activation by Gβγ, and it was only partially restored by human PLCβ3 with a mutation of the C terminus, which partly disrupted activation by Gα(q). Thus, both Gβγ and Gα(q) contribute to activation of PLCβ3 in cells for Ca(2+) synergy. We conclude that Ca(2+) synergy between Gα(i)-coupled and Gα(q)-coupled receptors requires the direct action of both Gβγ and Gα(q) on PLCβ and is mediated primarily by PLCβ3, although PLCβ2 is also competent.

Synergistic activation of phospholipase C-beta3 by Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma describes a simple two-state coincidence detector

BACKGROUND

Receptors that couple to G(i) and G(q) often interact synergistically in cells to elicit cytosolic Ca(2+) transients that are several-fold higher than the sum of those driven by each receptor alone. Such synergism is commonly assumed to be complex, requiring regulatory interaction between components, multiple pathways, or multiple states of the target protein.

RESULTS

We show that cellular G(i)-G(q) synergism derives from direct supra-additive stimulation of phospholipase C-beta3 (PLC-beta3) by G protein subunits Gbetagamma and Galpha(q), the relevant components of the G(i) and G(q) signaling pathways. No additional pathway or proteins are required. Synergism is quantitatively explained by the classical and simple two-state (inactive<-->active) allosteric mechanism. We show generally that synergistic activation of a two-state enzyme reflects enhanced conversion to the active state when both ligands are bound, not merely the enhancement of ligand affinity predicted by positive cooperativity. The two-state mechanism also explains why synergism is unique to PLC-beta3 among the four PLC-beta isoforms and, in general, why one enzyme may respond synergistically to two activators while another does not. Expression of synergism demands that an enzyme display low basal activity in the absence of ligand and becomes significant only when basal activity is </= 0.1% of maximal.

CONCLUSIONS

Synergism can be explained by a simple and general mechanism, and such a mechanism sets parameters for its occurrence. Any two-state enzyme is predicted to respond synergistically to multiple activating ligands if, but only if, its basal activity is strongly suppressed.

Cell culture models of the ocular barriers

The presence of tight barriers, which regulate the environment of ocular tissues in the anterior and posterior part of the eye, is essential for normal visual function. The development of strategies to overcome these barriers for the targeted ocular delivery of drugs, e.g. to the retina, remains a major challenge. During the last years numerous cell culture models of the ocular barriers (cornea, conjunctiva, blood-retinal barrier) have been established. They are considered to be promising tools for studying the drug transport into ocular tissues, and for numerous other purposes, such as the investigation of pathological ocular conditions, and the toxicological screening of compounds as alternative to in vivo toxicity tests. The further development of these in vitro models will require more detailed investigations of the barrier properties of both the cell culture models and the in vivo ocular barriers. It is the aim of this review to describe the current status in the development of cell culture models of the ocular barriers, and to discuss the applicability of these models in pharmaceutical research.

Potentiation of ATP-induced Ca2+ mobilisation in human retinal pigment epithelial cells

Interaction of signalling pathways directs the functional output of many cells. This study investigated the consequences of activating adenosine and adrenergic receptors on ATP-induced Ca2+ responses in human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) of human RPE cells in primary culture was monitored using Fura-2. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) concentration was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Both ATP and UTP (10 microM) increased [Ca2+]i in human RPE cells. Adenosine (10 nM-10 microM) had no effect on resting [Ca2+]i, but potentiated a sub-threshold response to ATP (100 nM) when ATP was added in the presence of adenosine. The potentiation occurred with other G-protein receptor agonists such as acetylcholine. Potentiation persisted in Ca-free medium, but was blocked by prior application of thapsigargin. The A1 and A2 adenosine receptor antagonists, DPCPX and MRS1706 (100 nM) respectively, inhibited potentiation in 76+/-7 and 23+/-12% of cells, respectively, but the A3 antagonist MRS1191 had no effect. Conversely, agents that activate the cAMP pathway, including isoproterenol (10 microM), forskolin (10 microM), and the protein kinase A (PKA) activator Sp-cBIMPS (1 microM), potentiated the ATP-induced response in the RPE cells. Agents that are known to inhibit the production of cAMP in other systems also caused potentiation, including clonidine (10 microM) and the Gi-activator mastoparan (10 microM). Under resting conditions, cAMP concentration in RPE cells was 7.1+/-0.5 pmol mg(-1) protein. Isoproterenol (10 microM) and forskolin (10 microM) increased levels to 104.6+/-5.2 and 113.7+/-4.2 pmol mg(-1) protein, respectively, while adenosine, clonidine, and mastoparan (all 10 microM) had no significant effect on cAMP levels. These data indicate that whilst activation of A1 and A2 adenosine receptors and alpha2 and beta adrenergic receptors does not influence basal Ca2+ levels, stimulation of these receptors can potentiate Ca2+ signalling by cAMP dependent and independent mechanisms in human RPE cells.

Cross talk between P2Y2 nucleotide receptors and CXC chemokine receptor 2 resulting in enhanced Ca2+ signaling involves enhancement of phospholipase C activity and is enabled by incremental Ca2+ release in human embryonic kidney cells

We have shown previously that activation of endogenously expressed, Galphaq/11-coupled P2Y2 nucleotide receptors with UTP reveals an intracellular Ca2+ response to activation of recombinant, Galphai-coupled CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) in human embryonic kidney cells. Here, we characterize further this cross talk and demonstrate that phospholipase C (PLC) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3]-dependent Ca2+ release underlies this potentiation. The putative Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor antagonist 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borane reduced the response to CXCR2 activation by interleukin-8, as did sustained inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase with wortmannin, suggesting the involvement of phosphoinositides in the potentiation. Against a Li+ block of inositol monophosphatase activity, costimulation of P2Y2 nucleotide receptors and CXCR2 caused phosphoinositide accumulation that was significantly greater than that after activation of P2Y2 nucleotide receptors or CXCR2 alone, and was more than additive. Thus, PLC activity, as well as Ca2+ release, was enhanced. In these cells, agonist-mediated Ca2+ release was incremental in nature, suggesting that a potentiation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 generation in the presence of coactivation of P2Y2 nucleotide receptors and CXCR2 would be sufficient for additional Ca2+ release. Potentiated Ca2+ signaling by CXCR2 was markedly attenuated by expression of either regulator of G protein signaling 2 or the Gbetagamma-scavenger Galphat1 (transducin alpha subunit), indicating the involvement of Galphaq and Gbetagamma subunits, respectively.

Mechanisms of cross-talk between G-protein-coupled receptors resulting in enhanced release of intracellular Ca2+

Alteration in [Ca(2+)](i) (the intracellular concentration of Ca(2+)) is a key regulator of many cellular processes. To allow precise regulation of [Ca(2+)](i) and a diversity of signalling by this ion, cells possess many mechanisms by which they are able to control [Ca(2+)](i) both globally and at the subcellular level. Among these are many members of the superfamily of GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), which are characterized by the presence of seven transmembrane domains. Typically, those receptors able to activate PLC (phospholipase C) enzymes cause release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores and influence Ca(2+) entry across the plasma membrane. It has been well documented that Ca(2+) signalling by one type of GPCR can be influenced by stimulation of a different type of GPCR. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated heterologous desensitization between two different PLC-coupled GPCRs. This is not surprising, given our current understanding of negative-feedback regulation and the likely shared components of the signalling pathway. However, there are also many documented examples of interactions between GPCRs, often coupling preferentially to different signalling pathways, which result in a potentiation of Ca(2+) signalling. Such interactions have important implications for both the control of cell function and the interpretation of in vitro cell-based assays. However, there is currently no single mechanism that adequately accounts for all examples of this type of cross-talk. Indeed, many studies either have not addressed this issue or have been unable to determine the mechanism(s) involved. This review seeks to explore a range of possible mechanisms to convey their potential diversity and to provide a basis for further experimental investigation.