Differential mRNA expression in ileal and colonic biopsies in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea or constipation

Sishen Wan enhances intestinal barrier function via regulating endoplasmic reticulum stress to improve mice with diarrheal irritable bowel syndrome

BACKGROUND

Diarrheal irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D), characterized primarily by the presence of diarrhea and abdominal pain, is a clinical manifestation resulting from a multitude of causative factors. Furthermore, Sishen Wan (SSW) has demonstrated efficacy in treating IBS-D. Nevertheless, its mechanism of action remains unclear.

METHODS

A model of IBS-D was induced by a diet containing 45 % lactose and chronic unpredictable mild stress. Additionally, the impact of SSW was assessed by measuring body weight, visceral sensitivity, defecation parameters, intestinal transport velocity, intestinal neurotransmitter levels, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy analysis. Immunofluorescent staining was used to detect the expression of Mucin 2 (MUC2) and Occludin in the colon. Western blotting was used to detect changes in proteins related to tight junction (TJ), autophagy, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in the colon. Finally, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was used to monitor the alteration of gut microbiota after SSW treatment.

RESULTS

Our study revealed that SSW administration resulted in reduced visceral sensitivity, improved defecation parameters, decreased intestinal transport velocity, and reduced intestinal permeability in IBS-D mice. Furthermore, SSW promotes the secretion of colonic mucus by enhancing autophagy and inhibiting ER stress. SSW treatment caused remodeling of the gut microbiome by increasing the abundance of Blautia, Muribaculum and Ruminococcus torques group.

CONCLUSION

SSW can improve intestinal barrier function by promoting autophagy and inhibiting ER stress, thus exerting a therapeutic effect on IBS-D.

Sera anti-neuronal antibodies in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and their correlations with clinical profiles

BACKGROUND

Immune factors were involved in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of the study was to test anti-neuronal antibodies in sera of IBS patients and demonstrate their correlations with IBS profiles and psychological disorders.

METHODS

Patients with IBS met Rome III criteria and excluded organic diseases were enrolled. Controls included healthy subjects (HS), slow transit functional constipation, autoimmune diseases, and so on. Indirect immunofluorescence with monkey cerebellum and small intestine as substrates was used to detect anti-neuronal antibodies including anti-cerebral neuronal antibodies (ACNA) and anti-enteric neuronal antibodies (AENA).

RESULTS

A total of 293 IBS patients, 100 HS and 153 disease controls were included in this study. The ACNA positive rate of IBS patients was significantly higher than HS (14% vs. 6%, p = 0.033). The positive rate of ACNA was significantly lower than AENA (14.0% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.028) in IBS patients. The prevalence of headache and sleeping disorder were higher in ACNA-positive IBS patients than ACNA-negative IBS patients (61% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.03; 75.6% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.03, respectively). Among IBS patients, ACNA and AENA were both negative in 21.8% patients, ACNA negative and AENA positive in 64.2% patients, and ACNA and AENA were both positive in 12.6% patients. There were no significant differences of intestinal symptoms among the three groups, while the prevalence of headache (64.9% vs. 37.5% and 44.7%, p = 0.03) and sleeping disorder (78.4% vs. 50.0% and 59.6%, p = 0.02) were higher in patients with both ACNA and AENA positive than patients with both ACNA and AENA negative, patients with ACNA negative and AENA positive. There were no significant differences of the prevalence of depression and anxiety, HAMD, and HAMA scores among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Anti-neuronal antibodies in sera of IBS patients were mainly targeted to enteric neurons and in a small part to cerebral neurons. ACNA were closely related to headache and sleeping disorder but unrelated to intestinal symptoms, depression, or anxiety of IBS patients.

Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated Nr1d1 chromatin circadian misalignment in stress-induced irritable bowel syndrome

Stress-elevated glucocorticoids cause circadian disturbances and gut-brain axis (GBA) disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We hypothesized that the glucocorticoid receptor (GR/NR3C1) might cause chromatin circadian misalignment in the colon epithelium. We observed significantly decreased core circadian gene Nr1d1 in water avoidance stressed (WAS) BALB/c colon epithelium, like in IBS patients. WAS decreased GR binding at the Nr1d1 promoter E-box (enhancer box), and GR could suppress Nr1d1 via this site. Stress also altered GR binding at the E-box sites along the Ikzf3-Nr1d1 chromatin and remodeled circadian chromatin 3D structures, including Ikzf3-Nr1d1 super-enhancer, Dbp, and Npas2. Intestinal deletion of Nr3c1 specifically abolished these stress-induced transcriptional alternations relevant to IBS phenotypes in BALB/c mice. GR mediated Ikzf3-Nr1d1 chromatin disease related circadian misalignment in stress-induced IBS animal model. This animal model dataset suggests that regulatory SNPs of human IKZF3-NR1D1 transcription through conserved chromatin looping have translational potential based on the GR-mediated circadian-stress crosstalk.

The Role of Ion Channels in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGID): Evidence of Channelopathies and Potential Avenues for Future Research and Therapeutic Targets

Several gastrointestinal (GI) tract abnormalities, including visceral hypersensitivity, motility, and intestinal permeability alterations, have been implicated in functional GI disorders (FGIDs). Ion channels play a crucial role in all the functions mentioned above. Hormones and natural molecules modulate these channels and represent targets of drugs and bacterial toxins. Mutations and abnormal functional expression of ion channel subunits can lead to diseases called channelopathies. These channelopathies in gastroenterology are gaining a strong interest, and the evidence of co-relationships is increasing. In this review, we describe the correlation status between channelopathies and FGIDs. Different findings are available. Among others, mutations in the ABCC7/CFTR gene have been described as a cause of constipation and diarrhea. Mutations of the SCN5A gene are instead associated with irritable bowel syndrome. In contrast, mutations of the TRPV1 and TRPA genes of the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily manifest hypersensitivity and visceral pain in sensory nerves. Recently, mice and humans affected by Cantu syndrome (CS), which is associated with the mutations of the KCNJ8 and ABCC9 genes encoding for the Kir6.1 and SUR2 subunits, showed dysfunction of contractility throughout the intestine and death in the mice after the weaning on solid food. The discovery of a correlation between channelopathies and FIGD opens new avenues for discovering new direct drug targets for specific channelopathies, leading to significant implications for diagnosing and treating functional GI diseases.

Irritable bowel syndrome: treatment based on pathophysiology and biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

To appraise the evidence that pathophysiological mechanisms and individualised treatment directed at those mechanisms provide an alternative approach to the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

DESIGN

A PubMED-based literature review of mechanisms and treatment of IBS was conducted independently by the two authors, and any differences of perspective or interpretation of the literature were resolved following discussion.

RESULTS

The availability of several noninvasive clinical tests can appraise the mechanisms responsible for symptom generation in IBS, including rectal evacuation disorders, abnormal transit, visceral hypersensitivity or hypervigilance, bile acid diarrhoea, sugar intolerances, barrier dysfunction, the microbiome, immune activation and chemicals released by the latter mechanism. The basic molecular mechanisms contributing to these pathophysiologies are increasingly recognised, offering opportunities to intervene with medications directed specifically to food components, receptors and potentially the microbiome. Although the evidence supporting interventions for each mechanism is not at the same level of proof, the current state-of-the-art provides the opportunity to advance the practice from treatment based on symptoms to individualisation of treatment guided by pathophysiology and clinically identified biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

These advances augur well for the implementation of evidence-based individualised treatment for patients with IBS based on actionable biomarkers or psychological disturbances.