Upper esophageal sphincter function during gastroesophageal reflux events revisited

What's with the Lump in the Throat? Globus, Dysphagia, and the Role of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

Globus is a feeling of a lump or fullness in the throat. It can be a symptom of reflux or a distinct functional disorder. Dysphagia is the sensation that food is hindered in passing from the mouth to the stomach. There are connections between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dysphagia. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPR) is likely a subset of GERD patients with specific alterations in upper esophageal sphincter (UES) reflexes that reduce esophageal refluxate clearance and increase the likelihood that refluxate will penetrate the UES barrier. In return, augmentation of the UES barrier can reduce LPR.

INFLUENCE OF ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IMPAIRMENT ON UPPER AND LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE IN CHAGAS DISEASE

BACKGROUND

Chagas disease causes digestive anatomic and functional changes, including the loss of the myenteric plexus and abnormal esophageal radiologic and manometric findings.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of abnormal esophageal radiologic findings, cardiac changes, distal esophageal contractions, and complaints of dysphagia and constipation in upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincter basal pressure in Chagas disease patients.

METHODS

The study evaluated 99 patients with Chagas disease and 40 asymptomatic normal volunteers. The patients had normal esophageal radiologic examination (n=61) or esophageal retention without an increase in esophageal diameter (n=38). UES and LES pressure was measured with the rapid pull-through method in a 4-channel water-perfused round catheter. Before manometry, the patients were asked about dysphagia and constipation and submitted to electrocardiography and chest radiography.

RESULTS

The amplitude of esophageal distal contraction decreased from controls to chagasic patients with esophageal retention. The proportion of failed and simultaneous contractions increased in patients with abnormal radiologic examination (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in UES and LES pressure between the groups. UES pressure was similar between Chagas disease patients with cardiomegaly (n=27, 126.5±62.7 mmHg) and those without it (n=72, 144.2±51.6 mmHg, P=0.26). Patients with constipation had lower LES pressure (n=23, 34.7±20.3 mmHg) than those without it (n=76, 42.9±20.5 mmHg, P<0.03).

CONCLUSION

Chagas disease patients with absent or mild esophageal radiologic involvement had no significant changes in UES and LES basal pressure. Constipation complaints are associated with decreased LES basal pressure.

Nature, severity, and impact of chronic oropharyngeal dysphagia following curative resection for esophageal cancer: a cross-sectional study

Chronic oropharyngeal dysphagia (COD) and aspiration after esophageal cancer surgery may have clinical significance; however, it is a rarely studied topic. In a prospective cross-sectional observational study we comprehensively evaluated the nature, severity, and impact of COD, its predictors, and the impact of the surgical approach and site of anastomosis. Forty participants were recruited via purposive sampling from the (Irish) National Center between November 2021 and August 2022. Swallow evaluations included videofluoroscopy [Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity v2 (DIGESTv2), MBS Impairment Profile, Penetration-Aspiration Scale)]. Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) identified oral intake status. The patient reported outcome measures of swallowing, and Quality of Life (QL) included EAT-10 and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Fourteen (35%) participants presented with COD on DIGESTv2 and 10% had uncleared penetration/aspiration. Avoidance or modification of diet on FOIS was observed in 17 (42.5%). FOIS was associated with pharyngeal dysphagia (OR = 4.05, P = 0.046). Median (range) EAT-10 and MDADI Composite results were 3(0-30) and 77.9(60-92.6), respectively. Aspiration rates significantly differed across surgical groups (P = 0.029); only patients undergoing transhiatal surgery aspirated. Survivors of esophageal cancer surgery may have COD that is undiagnosed, potentially impacting swallow-related QL. Given the small number of aspirators, further research is required to determine whether aspiration risk is associated with surgical approach. A FOIS score below 7 may be a clinically useful prompt for the MDT to refer for evaluation of COD following curative intent surgery. These data present findings that may guide preventive and rehabilitative strategies toward optimizing survivorship.

Integrative Review and Framework of Suggested Mechanisms in Primary Muscle Tension Dysphonia

PURPOSE

Despite the high prevalence of primary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD-1), its underlying mechanisms and their interrelationships have yet to be fully identified. The objectives of this integrative review were (a) to describe and classify the suggested underlying mechanisms for MTD-1, (b) to appraise the empirical evidence supporting each of the proposed mechanisms, and (c) to summarize the information in an integrative model.

METHOD

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched for all publications pertaining to muscle tension dysphonia. Papers were retained if they included theoretical or empirical data pertaining to underlying mechanisms of MTD-1. A total of 921 papers initially qualified for screening, of which 100 remained for consideration in this review. Underlying mechanisms of MTD-1 were extracted using a consensus approach.

RESULTS

Seven broad categories of putative mechanisms involved in MTD-1 were identified: psychosocial, autonomic, sensorimotor, respiratory, postural, inflammatory, and neuromuscular. These categories were further divided into 19 subcategories detailed in the body of this review article. Based on the reviewed evidence, our proposed integrative model presents MTD-1 as an idiosyncratic motor adaptation to physiological perturbation or perceived threat. Under this model, physiologically or psychologically aversive stimuli can instigate a series of motor adaptations at multiple levels of the nervous system, ultimately disturbing muscle activation patterns and their biomechanical outcomes. Importantly, these adaptations appear to have the potential to become chronic even after threatening stimuli are withdrawn.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model highlights the importance of personalized rehabilitation in MTD-1 treatment. Limitations of the literature are discussed to provide guidance for future research aimed at improving our understanding of MTD-1.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19586065.

Functional Changes of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter in Gastroesophageal Reflux

Introduction The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is a muscular structure located at the transition from the pharynx to the esophagus, with the cricopharyngeal muscle as the most important component. During gastroesophageal reflux, the pressure in the UES elevates, which is apparently a protective mechanism to prevent esophagopharyngeal reflux and airway aspiration. In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), there may be functional changes in the UES.

Objective The objective of the present review was to determine UES functional changes in GERD.

Data Synthesis In healthy individuals, gastroesophageal reflux causes an increase in the UES pressure. This response of the sphincter is at least partially impaired in patients with GERD. In the disease, the UES has a reduced length and decreased resting pressure. However, other publications found that in chronic gastroesophageal reflux the basal sphincter pressure increase, differences which may be consequent to the measurement method or to disease severity. The UES opening during swallowing has a smaller diameter, and the bolus transit time through the sphincter is longer.

Conclusion The UES of patients with GERD does not open as expected and the bolus flow through the sphincter is longer. This behavior may be associated with dysphagia, a frequent complaint in patients with GERD.

Influence of Acid Swallows on the Dynamics of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter

Mechanisms of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) when exposed to acid are still incompletely understood. The presented work investigated the reaction of the UES to acid exposure during swallowing. Ten healthy individuals swallowed ten 2 ml neutral water boli of pH 7, followed by 10 swallows each of different levels of acidity (pH 1.8, pH 3 and pH 5). Effects were analyzed by high-resolution manometry (HRM) for the primary parameter Restitution Time, as well as Resting Pressures, maximal, minimal pressures and time intervals. Restitution Times measured mean values of 12.67 s (SD ± 7.03 s) for pH 1.8, pH 7 = 8.69 s (SD ± 2.72 s), pH 3 = 7.56 s (SD ± 2.23 s) and pH 5 = 7.29 s (SD ± 2.55 s), showing prolonged Restitution Times in the UES when exposed to strong bolus acidity. This difference was significant towards the neutral bolus, but also to less acidic boli (pH 5: p = 0.006, pH 3: p = 0.009, pH 7: p = 0.038). Considerable differences of mean values were found for Post-Swallow Maximum and Period of Sphincter Activity. Also, Pre-Swallow Maximum values were found to be highest with the strongest acid. Relaxation Times showed a slight trend of prolongation for the highest bolus acidity. Prolonged Restitution Times may represent a reflexive protective mechanism triggered by receptors in the pharyngeal mucosa or the UES preventing regurgitation of acid into the pharynx and larynx, besides representing ongoing attempts of acid clearance. Exposure to high levels of acidity by a swallowed bolus does influence UES functions during swallowing.

Alternatives to Acid Suppression Treatment for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVE

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and associated symptoms can be refractory to treatment with acid suppressing medication. We investigated the role and evidence for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for LPR in this systematic review.

REVIEW METHODS

Complementary and alternative treatment was defined in this systematic review as any non-acid suppressing medication, treatment, or therapy. A literature search was performed by two authors in consultation with a medical librarian using controlled vocabulary for "complementary and alternative medicine" and "laryngopharyngeal reflux" in the databases PubMed and EMBASE, with supplemental searches with Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included in this review for the modalities: alginate, diet modification, prokinetics, respiratory retraining, voice therapy, rikkunshito (RKT), hypnotherapy, and sleep positioning. The studies were analyzed for bias based on the Cochrane criteria for RCTs and Methodological Index for non-RCT (MINORS) criteria for all other studies. For each modality a level of evidence was assigned to the current body of evidence using the GRADE approach.

CONCLUSION

There is mixed evidence with a high degree of bias and heterogeneity between studies for the modalities presented in the paper. Based on this review, an anti-reflux diet is recommended for all patients and there is some low-quality evidence to support alkaline water. For patients with predominant vocal symptoms there is evidence that supports voice therapy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend prokinetics at this time. For patients with predominant globus symptoms, alginate, RKT, and relaxation strategies may be used in conjunction with acid suppressing medications for symptom relief.

Prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation

OBJECTIVE

Heartburn and regurgitation are the most common gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and dysphagia could be a possible symptom. This investigation aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation.

METHODS

A total of 147 patients (age, 20-70 years; women, 72%) complaining of heartburn and regurgitation, without esophageal stricture, previous esophageal surgery, or other diseases, were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had esophagitis. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was employed to screen for dysphagia; EAT-10 is composed of 10 items, and the patients rate each item from 0 to 4 (0, no problems; 4, most severe symptom). Results of the 147 patients were compared with those of 417 healthy volunteers (women, 62%; control group) aged 20-68 years.

RESULTS

In the control group, only two (0.5%) had an EAT-10 score ≥5, which was chosen as the threshold to define dysphagia. EAT-10 scores ≥5 were found in 71 (48.3%) patients and in 55% of the patients with esophagitis and 47% of the patients without esophagitis. This finding indicates a relatively higher prevalence of perceived dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation and in patients with esophagitis. We also found a positive correlation between EAT-10 scores and the severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on the Velanovich scale.

CONCLUSION

In patients with heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, the prevalence of dysphagia was at least 48%, and has a positive correlation with the overall symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Elicitation of the Swallowing Reflex by Esophageal Stimulation in Healthy Subjects: An Evaluation Using High-Resolution Manometry

The purposes of this human study using high-resolution manometry were to verify whether the swallowing reflex can be evoked by intra-esophageal fluid injection and whether the reflex latency and manometric variables differ depending on the injected location, amount, or speed. Ten healthy individuals participated in this study. The tip of the intranasal catheter for injection was placed at 5 cm (upper), 10 cm (upper-middle), 15 cm (lower-middle), or 20 cm (lower) from the distal end of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). An intra-esophageal injection of 3 mL or 10 mL of thickened water was administered and controlled at 3 mL/s or 10 mL/s. Latencies from the start of the injection to the onset of UES relaxation were compared regarding injection locations, amounts, and rates. Manometric variables of intra-esophageal injection and voluntary swallowing were compared. The latency became shorter when the upper region was injected. Latency after the 10-mL injection was shorter than that after the 3-mL injection (p < 0.01) when faster injection (10 mL/s) was used. Faster injection induced shorter latency (p < 0.01) when a larger volume (10 mL) was injected. Pre-maximum and post-maximum UES pressures during voluntary swallowing or during spontaneous swallowing when injecting the upper esophageal region were significantly higher than spontaneous swallowing at other regions (p < 0.01). Intra-esophageal fluid injection induces the swallowing reflex in humans. The most effective condition for inducing the swallowing reflex involved a larger fluid amount with a faster injection rate in the upper esophagus.

Effects of esophageal acidification on esophageal reflexes controlling the upper esophageal sphincter

Esophageal acid exposure can alter upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function, but the mechanism is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of esophageal acid exposure on esophago-UES relaxation (EURR) and contractile (EUCR) reflexes. Cats, decrebrate ( n = 27) or chronic ( n = 4), were implanted with electromyographic electrodes on pharynx, larynx, and esophagus. The esophagus was infused with either NaCl (0.9%) or HCl (0.1 N). The EUCR was activated by balloon distension in acute cats and slow air injection in chronic cats, and the EURR was activated by rapid air injection in both sets of cats. We found that NaCl infused for 15 or 30 min had no effect on EUCR or EURR in acute cats. HCl infused for 15, 30, or 45 min significantly ( P < 0.05) decreased the sensitivity to activate EUCR. HCl infused for 15 min significantly ( P < 0.05) increased and for 45 min significantly ( P < 0.05) decreased sensitivity to activate EURR. In chronic cats, HCl infused for 15 min/day increased sensitivity to activate EURR and decreased ( P < 0.05) sensitivity to activate EUCR after 4 days of infusion. EURR occurred spontaneously during HCl infusions on the 3rd and 4th ( P < 0.05) days of HCl infusion. We conclude that esophageal acid exposure initially sensitizes the esophagus to activation of EURR and desensitizes to activation of EUCR, but with longer exposure desensitizes to both. The alteration in sensitivity to activate EURR and EUCR caused by gastroesophageal reflux may play a role in the generation of supraesophageal reflux. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In acute studies, short-term esophageal acid exposure sensitizes esophagus to activation of esophago-upper esophageal sphincter relaxation response (EURR), whereas longer-term exposure inhibits EURR. Short- or long-term esophageal acid exposure decreases sensitivity to activation of esophago-upper esophageal sphincter contractile response (EUCR). In chronic studies, short-term esophageal acid exposure has the same effects on EURR and EUCR as occur acutely, but these effects take days to develop. Alteration in EURR and EUCR caused by gastroesophageal reflux may play a role in reflux disease.

Comparative effect of the sites of anterior cervical pressure on the geometry of the upper esophageal sphincter high-pressure zone

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

External cricoid pressure is increasingly used to augment the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Our objective was to determine the effect of 1) pressures applied to cricoid, supracricoid, and subcricoid regions on the length and amplitude of the UES high-pressure zone (UESHPZ), and 2) the external cricoid pressure on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tone.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

We studied 11 patients with supraesophageal reflux (mean age 58 ± 12 years) and 10 healthy volunteers (mean age 47 ± 19 years). We tested 20, 30, and 40 mm Hg pressures to cricoid, 1 cm proximal and 1 cm distal to the cricoid. In an additional 15 healthy volunteers (mean age 46 ± 23 years), we studied the effect of external cricoid pressure on LES tone. UES and LES pressures were determined using high-resolution manometry.

RESULTS

There was significant increase of UESHPZ length with application of pressure at all sites. The increase of UESHPZ length was relatively symmetric, more orad, and more caudad when the pressure was applied at the cricoid, supracricoid, and subcricoid levels, respectively. The magnitude of pressure increase was greatest at the middle and orad part of the UESHPZ when the pressure was applied at the cricoid and supracricoid levels, respectively. The corresponding magnitude of increase in the caudad part of the UESHPZ was not observed with pressure at the subcricoid level. There was no change of the LES pressure with application of cricoid pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of external pressure on the UESHPZ is site dependent. Subcricoid pressure has the least effect on UESHPZ. External cricoid pressure at 20 to 40 mm Hg has no effect on the LES pressure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b. Laryngoscope, 127:2466-2474, 2017.

Upper esophageal sphincter motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease in the light of the high-resolution manometry

This study aims to evaluate the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as compared to healthy volunteers. We retrospectively studied the HRM tests of 44 patients (median age: 61 years, 54% females) under evaluation for GERD. The manometric UES parameters of these patients were compared to 40 healthy volunteers (median age: 27 years, 50% females). Almost half of the patients had a short and hypotonic UES. Patients with extraesophageal symptoms had a higher proportion of hypotonic UES as compared to patients with esophageal symptoms. Reflux pattern did not influence manometric parameters. Proximal reflux (any number of episodes) was present in 37(84%) patients (median number of proximal episodes = 6). Manometric parameters are similar in the presence or absence of proximal reflux. There is not a correlation between the UES length and UES basal pressure. In conclusion, our results show that: (1) the manometric profile of the UES in patients with GERD is characterized by a short and hypotonic UES in half of the patients; (2) this profile is more pronounced in patients with extraesophageal symptoms; and (3) neither the presence of proximal reflux nor reflux pattern bring a different manometric profile.

Impaired upper esophageal sphincter reflexes in patients with supraesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Normal responses of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and esophageal body to liquid reflux events prevent esophagopharyngeal reflux and its complications, however, abnormal responses have not been characterized. We investigated whether patients with supraesophageal reflux disease (SERD) have impaired UES and esophageal body responses to simulated reflux events.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 25 patients with SERD (age, 19-82 y; 13 women) and complaints of regurgitation and supraesophageal manifestations of reflux. We also included 10 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; age, 32-60 y; 7 women) without troublesome regurgitation and supraesophageal symptoms and 24 healthy asymptomatic individuals (controls: age, 19-49 y; 13 women). UES and esophageal body pressure responses, along with luminal distribution of infusate during esophageal rapid and slow infusion of air or liquid, were monitored by concurrent high-resolution manometry and intraluminal impedance.

RESULTS

A significantly smaller proportion of patients with SERD had UES contractile reflexes in response to slow esophageal infusion of acid than controls or patients with GERD. Only patients with SERD had abnormal UES relaxation responses to rapid distension with saline. Diminished esophageal peristaltic contractions resulted in esophageal stasis in patients with GERD or SERD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SERD and complaints of regurgitation have impaired UES and esophageal responses to simulated liquid reflux events. These patterns could predispose them to esophagopharyngeal reflux.

Distinct afferent innervation patterns within the human proximal and distal esophageal mucosa

Little is known about the mucosal phenotype of the proximal human esophagus. There is evidence to suggest that the proximal esophagus is more sensitive to chemical and mechanical stimulation compared with the distal. This may have physiological relevance (e.g., in prevention of aspiration of gastroesophageal refluxate), but also pathological relevance (e.g., in reflux perception or dysphagia). Reasons for this increased sensitivity are unclear but may include impairment in mucosal barrier integrity or changes in sensory innervation. We assessed mucosal barrier integrity and afferent nerve distribution in the proximal and distal esophagus of healthy human volunteers. In 10 healthy volunteers baseline proximal and distal esophageal impedance was measured in vivo. Esophageal mucosal biopsies from the distal and proximal esophagus were taken, and baseline transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) was measured in Ussing chambers. Biopsies were examined immunohistochemically for presence and location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive nerve fibers. In a further four healthy volunteers we investigated for colocalization of CGRP and protein gene product (PGP) 9.5 immunoreactivity in nerve fibers. Baseline impedance was higher in the proximal than in the distal esophagus [2,936 Ω (SD578) vs. 2,229 Ω (SD821); P = 0.03], however, baseline TER was not significantly different between them. Mucosal CGRP-immunoreactive nerves were found in the epithelium of both proximal and distal esophagus, but were located more superficially in the proximal mucosa compared with the distal [11.5 (SD7) vs. 21.7 (SD5) cell layers from lumen, P = 0.002] 19% of proximal, and 10% of distal mucosal PGP-immunoreactive fibers colocalized with CGRP. PGP-immunoreactive fibers were also significantly closer to the luminal surface in the proximal compared with the distal esophagus (P < 0.001). We conclude that mucosal barrier integrity is similar in proximal and distal esophagus, but proximal mucosal afferent nerves are in a more superficial location. The enhanced sensitivity to reflux-evoked symptoms of the proximal esophagus most likely has an anatomical basis.

[Physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter]

The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) forms a barrier between the pharynx and the esophagus. When opened, the UES allows the food bolus to pass into the esophagus, as well as permitting emesis and eructation. The basal sphincter tone constitutes a barrier function which serves to prevent reflux and passive aerophagia in the case of deep breathing. Basal sphincter tone is dependent on several influencing factors; during swallowing, sphincter opening and closure follow a complex multiphase pattern. This article presents an overview of the current understanding of UES physiology.

Prevention of esophagopharyngeal reflux by augmenting the upper esophageal sphincter pressure barrier

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Incompetence of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is fundamental to the occurrence of esophagopharyngeal reflux (EPR), and development of supraesophageal manifestations of reflux disease (SERD). However, therapeutic approaches to SERD have not been directed to strengthening of the UES barrier function. Our aims were to demonstrate that EPR events can be experimentally induced in SERD patients and not in healthy controls, and ascertain if these events can be prevented by application of a modest external cricoid pressure.

STUDY DESIGN

Individual case control study.

METHODS

We studied 14 SERD patients (57 ± 13 years, 8 females) and 12 healthy controls (26 ± 3 years, 7 females) by concurrent intraesophageal slow infusion and pharyngoscopic and manometric technique without and with the application of a sustained predetermined cricoid pressure to induce, detect, and prevent EPR, respectively.

RESULTS

Slow esophageal infusion (1 mL/s) of 60 mL of HCl resulted in a total of 16 objectively confirmed EPR events in none patients and none in healthy controls. All patients developed subjective sensation of regurgitation. Sustained cricoid pressure resulted in a significant UES pressure augmentation in all participants. During application of sustained cricoid pressure, slow intraesophageal infusion resulted in only one EPR event (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Slow esophageal liquid infusion unmasks UES incompetence evidenced as the occurrence of EPR. Application of 20 to 30 mm Hg cricoid pressure significantly increases the UES intraluminal pressure and prevents pharyngeal reflux induced by esophageal slow liquid infusion. These techniques can be useful in diagnosis and management of UES incompetence in patients suffering from supraesophageal manifestations of reflux disease.

Upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction: diverticula-globus pharyngeus

The following discussion of upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction includes commentaries on the role of the cricopharyngeus muscle in reflux disease; the etiology and treatment of Zenker diverticulum; the use of videofluoroscopy in patients with dysphagia, suspicion of aspiration, or globus; the role of pH-impedance monitoring in globus evaluation; and treatment for reflux-associated globus.

Specific movement of esophagus during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Background/Aims

Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) is the main mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of transient lower esophageal sphincter movement in patients with or without gastroesophageal reflux by high-resolution manometry (HRM).

Methods

From June 2010 to July 2010, we enrolled 9 patients with GERD (GERD group) and 9 subjects without GERD (control group), prospectively. The manometry test was performed in a semi-recumbent position for 120 minutes following ingestion of a standardized, mixed liquid and solid meal. HRM was used to identify the frequency and duration of TLESR, esophageal shortening length from incomplete TLESR, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) response, and the related esophageal motor responses during TLESR.

Results

TLESR occurred in 33 in the GERD group and 34 in the control group after 120 minutes following food ingestion. Duration of TLESR and length of esophageal shortening did not differ between 2 groups. UES pressure increase during TLESR was mostly detected in patients with GERD, and UES relaxation was observed frequently in the control group during TLESR. TLESR-related motor responses terminating in TLESR were predominantly observed in the control group.

Conclusions

Increased UES pressure was noted frequently in the GERD group, suggesting a mechanism for preventing harmful reflux, which may be composed mainly of fluid on the larynx or pharynx. However, patients with GERD lacked the related motor responses terminating in TLESR to promote esophageal emptying of refluxate.

Response of the upper esophageal sphincter to esophageal distension is affected by posture, velocity, volume, and composition of the infusate

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Studies of the pressure response of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) to simulated or spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux have shown conflicting results. These discrepancies could result from uncontrolled influence of variables such as posture, volume, and velocity of distension. We characterized in humans the effects of these variables on UES pressure response to esophageal distension.

METHODS

We studied 12 healthy volunteers (average, 27 ± 5 years old; 6 male) using concurrent esophageal infusion and high-resolution manometry to determine UES, lower esophageal sphincter, and intraesophageal pressure values. Reflux events were simulated by distal esophageal injections of room temperature air and water (5, 10, 20, and 50 mL) in individuals in 3 positions (upright, supine, and semisupine). Frequencies of various UES responses were compared using χ(2) analysis. Multinomial logistical regression analysis was used to identify factors that determine the UES response.

RESULTS

UES contraction and relaxation were the overriding responses to esophageal water and air distension, respectively, in a volume-dependent fashion (P < .001). Water-induced UES contraction and air-induced UES relaxation were the predominant responses among individuals in supine and upright positions, respectively (P < .001). The prevalence of their respective predominant response significantly decreased in the opposite position. Proximal esophageal dp/dt significantly and independently differentiated the UES response to infusion with water or air.

CONCLUSIONS

The UES response to esophageal distension is affected by combined effects of posture (spatial orientation of the esophagus), physical properties, and volume of refluxate, as well as the magnitude and rate of increase in intraesophageal pressure. The UES response to esophageal distension can be predicted using a model that incorporates these factors.

Mechanisms of esophago-pharyngeal acid regurgitation in human subjects

Esophago-pharyngeal regurgitation is implicated in various otolaryngologic and respiratory disorders. The pathophysiological mechanisms causing regurgitation are still largely unknown.

Establishment of a reflux esophago-laryngitis model in rats

BACKGROUND

To investigate the pathophysiology of reflux laryngitis, an experimental model is required.

AIM

The aim of this study is to establish an animal model of reflux esophago-laryngitis, modifying our previously reported model of chronic acid reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

The modified chronic acid reflux esophagitis (m-RE) group (n = 10), in which the duodenum was wrapped with 2.5 mm of Nelaton catheter, was not treated with any drugs. Also postoperatively, two treatment groups (n = 10 in each) received different dosages of rabeprazole (RPZ): 1.0 mg/kg/day (RPZ 1.0 group) or 10.0 mg/kg/day (RPZ 10.0 group). As a control group (n = 5), other rats underwent sham operation. The esophagus and larynx were resected on day 14 after the operation, and ulcer score of the esophagus was assessed. The epithelial thickness and leukocyte infiltration of the supraglottic and subglottic laryngeal mucosae were investigated. The number of interleukin (IL)-1β-positive cells was also counted and defined as the IL-1β labeling index.

RESULTS

In the m-RE group, the epithelial thickness, leukocyte infiltration, and IL-1β labeling index of the supraglottic and subglottic laryngeal mucosae were increased compared with controls (P < 0.01). In the RPZ groups, not only the ulcer score of esophagus but also the epithelial thickness, leukocyte infiltration, and IL-1β labeling index of both the supraglottic and subglottic laryngeal mucosae were decreased dose-dependently relative to the m-RE group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified chronic acid reflux esophagitis model proved useful in establishing a rat reflux esophago-laryngitis model, with both pathological laryngeal findings and reflux esophagitis shown to be improved by administration of a proton pump inhibitor.

Physiology and pathophysiology of glottic reflexes and pulmonary aspiration: from neonates to adults

Pulmonary aspiration is the consequence of abnormal entry of fluid, particulate material, or endogenous secretions into the airway. The two main types of aspiration scenarios include anterograde aspiration, which occurs during swallowing, and retrograde aspiration, which can occur during gastroesophageal reflux (GER) events. The important structures that protect against aspiration include the aerodigestive apparatus: pharynx, upper esophageal sphincter, esophageal body, glottis and vocal cords, and airway. In this article we review the neuroanatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology pertinent to glottic reflexes and airway aspiration across the age spectrum from neonates to adults. We also discuss recent advances in our understanding of glottal reflexes and the relationship of these reflexes to developmental anatomy and physiology, the pathophysiology of aspiration, and aerodigestive interactions.

Pharyngolaryngeal reflux in patients who underwent cervical esophago-gastrostomy following esophagectomy

Pharyngolaryngeal reflux has been generally accepted as a cause for pharyngolaryngitis, hoarseness, aspiration pneumonia, chronic cough, and nocturnal asthma. Although patients who have undergone gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy are at a high risk to pharyngolaryngeal reflux disease (PLRD), PLRD after esophagectomy is still unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between reflux pharyngolaryngitis and acid reflux into the hypopharynx and into the cervical esophagus in patients who have undergone cervical esophagogastrostomy. We enrolled 62 patients who received follow-up endoscopy and 24-h pH monitoring after cervical esophagogastrostomy. These included 26 at 1 month after surgery and 36 at 1 year or more after surgery. We investigated: (i) the correlation between the extent of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and that of reflux esophagitis based on endoscopic findings; and (ii) the correlation between the extent of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and that of acid exposure -'% time pH < 4' measured by 24-h pH monitoring - in the hypopharynx and in the cervical esophagus, and of acidity in the gastric conduit. There was no difference in acid exposure between the hypopharynx and the cervical esophagus according to time after surgery. However, the acidity in the gastric conduit was significantly more at one year or more after surgery compared with acidity at 1 month after surgery (P= 0.001). There was a significant correlation between acid exposure in the hypopharynx and that in the cervical esophagus (P < 0.001), although acid exposure in the hypopharynx was significantly less than that in the cervical esophagus (P < 0.001). A significant correlation between reflux pharyngolaryngitis and reflux esophagitis was observed (P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between reflux pharyngolaryngitis and acid exposure in the hypopharynx (P= 0.021), and also that in the proximal esophagus (P= 0.001). The correlation between the extent of reflux pharyngolaryngitis and the acidity in the gastric conduit was not observed. These findings are consistent with pharyngolaryngitis being caused by gastro-esophago-pharyngolaryngeal reflux in patients after cervical esophagogastrostomy, despite the upper esophageal sphincter strongly preventing acid reflux from the cervical esophagus into the hypopharynx.

Upper esophageal sphincter during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation: effects of reflux content and posture

Although some studies show that the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) contracts during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR), others show that it relaxes. We hypothesized that the posture of the subject and constituents of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) may determine the type of UES response during the TLESR. High-resolution manometry and esophageal pH/impedance recording were performed in 10 healthy volunteers in the right recumbent (1 h) and upright (1 h) positions following the ingestion of a 1,000-Kcal meal. The UES pressure response during TLESR and constituents of GER (liquid, air, and pH) were determined. 109 TLESRs (58 upright and 51 recumbent) were analyzed. The majority of TLESRs were associated with GER (91% upright and 88% recumbent) events. UES relaxation was the predominant response during upright position (81% of TLESRs), and it was characteristically associated with presence of air in the reflux (92%). On the other hand, UES contraction was the predominant response during recumbent position (82% of TLESRs), and it was mainly associated with liquid reflux (71%). The rate of esophageal pressure increase (dP/dt) during the GER, but not the pH, had major influence on the type of UES response during TLESR. The dP/dt during air reflux (127 +/- 39 mmHg/s) was significantly higher than liquid reflux (31 +/- 6 mmHg/s, P < 0.0001). We concluded that the nature of UES response during TLESR, relaxation or contraction, is related to the posture and the constituents of GER. We propose that the rapid rate of esophageal pressure increase associated with air reflux determines the UES relaxation response to GER.

Globus sensation and increased upper esophageal sphincter pressure with distal esophageal acid perfusion

The aim of the present study was to determine whether acid perfusion into the distal esophagus causes a globus sensation and an increase in upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure. UES pressures were measured using a sleeve-type sensor in 20 healthy volunteers. A 0.1-N HCl solution, the same as gastric acid, was perfused into the distal esophagus at a rate of 20 mL/min. During perfusion, 4-channel pH monitoring was performed to determine whether the HCl reached the hypopharynx. The following parameters were measured: (1) changes in UES pressure before and during acid perfusion, (2) presence or absence of a globus sensation or heartburn, (3) the time at which a globus sensation or heartburn was noted by the patient and (4) the position of the electrode at which the pH drop was recorded. Ten subjects enrolled as the control group received perfusions of distilled water. Acid perfusion raised the UES pressure in 13 of the 20 subjects. All 13 complained of globus at about the same time as the UES pressure increased. Twelve of the 13 subjects who experienced globus also complained of heartburn, which preceded the globus sensation in ten such cases. None of the control subjects reported globus or had elevated UES pressure. In the acid perfusion group, no pH reduction at the two most cranial electrodes was observed in any subject. In conclusion, the globus sensation is due to elevated UES pressure, resulting from gastroesophageal reflux and does not require direct exposure of the hypopharynx to gastric acid. The incidence of heartburn in combination with a globus sensation would be much higher if the cause of the latter were acid reflux.

Oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PURPOSE: patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) can be vulnerable to respiratory incompetence that may lead to swallowing impairment. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the relationship between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and oropharyngeal dysphagia. Forty-seven articles were retrieved relating to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and dysphagia. Each article was graded using evidence-based methodology. Only 7 articles out of the 47 addressed oropharyngeal swallowing disorders in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. This review found few studies that documented the relationship between oropharyngeal swallowing disorders and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. There were no randomized control trials. CONCLUSION: although the evidence is not strong, it appears that patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease are prone to oropharyngeal dysphagia during exacerbations. Future studies are needed to document the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in homogeneous groups of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and to assess the relationship between respiration and swallowing using simultaneous measures of swallowing biomechanics and respiratory function. These investigations will lead to a better understanding of the characteristics and risk factors of developing oropharyngeal dypshagia in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

A high-resolution view of achalasia

BACKGROUND

High-resolution manometry (HRM) makes it possible to better evaluate spatial and temporal characteristics of esophageal motor function. This technology is revealing new observations regarding disordered motor function in esophageal diseases.

GOAL

The aim of this study was to define the essential features of achalasia using HRM.

STUDY

We performed HRM on 27 patients with achalasia, 10 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 10 controls. Ten 5 mL water swallows were recorded with a solid-state manometric assembly incorporating 36 circumferential sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals.

RESULTS

The resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was greater in achalasia than in controls or gastroesophageal reflux disease. There was an absence of peristalsis in the smooth muscle esophagus and failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure was not different among the 3 groups. In addition to the typical manometric findings of achalasia, new observations are included. Esophageal shortening, pressurization of the esophagus, and rhythmic contractions of the upper esophageal sphincter and striated muscle esophagus were frequently observed.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM demonstrates alterations of esophageal motor function in achalasia that are not easily observed with other manometric techniques.

Differential relaxation and contractile responses of the human upper esophageal sphincter mediated by interplay of mucosal and deep mechanoreceptor activation

the neural mechanisms of distension-induced esophagoupper esophageal sphincter (UES) reflexes have not been explored in humans. We investigated the modulation of these reflexes by mucosal anesthesia, acid exposure, and GABA(B) receptor activation. In 55 healthy human subjects, UES responses to rapid esophageal air insufflation and slow balloon distension were examined before and after pretreatment with 15 ml of topical esophageal lidocaine, esophageal HCl infusion, and baclofen 40 mg given orally. In response to rapid esophageal distension, UES can variably relax or contract. Following a mucosal blockade by topical lidocaine, the likelihood of a UES relaxation response was reduced by 11% (P < 0.01) and the likelihood of a UES contractile response was increased by 14% (P < 0.001) without alteration in the overall UES response rate. The UES contractile response to rapid esophageal air insufflation was also increased by 8% (P < 0.05) following sensitization by prior mucosal acid exposure. The UES contractile response, elicited by balloon distension, was regionally dependent (P < 0.05) (more frequent and of higher amplitude with proximal esophageal distension), and the response was attenuated by topical lidocaine (P < 0.05). Baclofen (40 mg po) had no effect on these UES reflexes. Abrupt gaseous esophageal distension activates simultaneously both excitatory and inhibitory pathways to the UES. Partial blockade of the mucosal mechanosensitive receptors permits an enhanced UES contractile response mediated by deeper esophageal mechanoreceptors. Activation of acid-sensitive esophageal mucosal chemoreceptors upregulates the UES contractile response, suggestive of a protective mechanism.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: Current concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is the backflow of gastric contents into the pharynx and larynx. The diagnosis of LPR is primarily based on symptoms, including dysphonia, dysphagia, globus, throat-clearing, and post-nasal drip. The gold standard for diagnosis is dual-probe 24-hour pH testing with the upper probe positioned above the upper oesophageal sphincter. Treatment may require 3 months or more of twice-daily proton pump inhibitors along with lifestyle modifications. This review details the pathophysiology, symptoms, findings, treatment, and current controversies in LPR.

Upper sphincter function during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (tLOSR); it is mainly about microburps

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (tLOSRs) are both a dominant mechanism of reflux and an element of the belch reflex. This study aimed to analyse the interplay between reflux and upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) activity during meal-induced tLOSRs. Fifteen normal subjects were studied with a solid-state high-resolution manometry assembly positioned to record from the hypopharynx to the stomach and a catheter pH electrode 5 cm above the LOS. Subjects ate a 1000-calorie high-fat meal and were monitored for 120 min in a sitting posture. The relationship among tLOSRs, common cavities, pressure changes within the oesophagus and UOS contractile activity were analysed. A total of 218 tLOSRs occurred among the 15 subjects. The majority (79%) were coupled with UOS relaxation and 84% (145/173) of these occurred in association with a common cavity. Upper oesophageal sphincter relaxation was usually preceded by a pressure change in the oesophagus; however, some relaxations (16%) occurred without a discernable increase in pressure or before the pressure increase began. Acid reflux did not appear to play a role in determining UOS response to tLOSRs. The majority of post-prandial tLOSRs were associated with brief periods of UOS relaxation, likely permissive of gas venting (microburps). Intraoesophageal pressure changes likely modulate this UOS response; however, an anticipatory characteristic was evident in some subjects. Whether or not GORD patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms exhibit an exaggeration of the UOS relaxation response during reflux is yet to be determined.

Anatomy of reflux: a growing health problem affecting structures of the head and neck

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are sibling diseases that are a modern-day plague. Millions of Americans suffer from their sequelae, ranging from subtle annoyances to life-threatening illnesses such as asthma, sleep apnea, and cancer. Indeed, the recognized prevalence of GERD alone has increased threefold throughout the 1990s. Knowledge of the precise etiologies for GERD and LPR is becoming essential for proper treatment. This review focuses on the anatomical, physiological, neurobiological, and cellular aspects of these diseases. By definition, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus; when excessive and damaging to the esophageal mucosa, GERD results. Reflux that advances to the laryngopharynx and, subsequently, to other regions of the head and neck such as the larynx, oral cavity, nasopharynx, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and even middle ear results in LPR. While GERD has long been identified as a source of esophageal disease, LPR has only recently been implicated in causing head and neck problems. Recent research has identified four anatomical/physiological "barriers" that serve as guardians to prevent the cranial incursion of reflux: the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motor function and acid clearance, the upper esophageal sphincter, and pharyngeal and laryngeal mucosal resistance. Sequential failure of all four barriers is necessary to produce LPR. While it has become apparent that GER must precede both GERD and LPR, the head and neck distribution of the latter clearly separates these diseases as distinct entities warranting specialized focus and treatment.

Effect of maturation of the magnitude of mechanosensitive and chemosensitive reflexes in the premature human esophagus

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of esophageal mechanosensitive and chemosensitive stimulation on the magnitude and recruitment of peristaltic reflexes and upper esophageal sphincter (UES)-contractile reflex in premature infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Esophageal manometry and provocation testing were performed in the same 18 neonates at 33 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA). Mechanoreceptor and chemoreceptor stimulation were performed using graded volumes of air, water, and apple juice (pH 3.7), respectively. The frequency and magnitude of the resulting esophago-deglutition response (EDR) or secondary peristalsis (SP), and esophago-UES-contractile reflex (EUCR) were quantified.

RESULTS

Threshold volumes to evoke EDR, SP, or EUCR were similar. The recruitment and magnitude of SP and EUCR increased with volume increments of air and water in either study (P < .05). However, apple juice infusions resulted in increased recruitment of EDR in the 33 weeks group (P < .05), and SP in the 36 weeks group (P < .05). The magnitude of EUCR was also volume responsive (all media, P < .05), and significant differences between media were noted (P < .05). At maximal stimulation (1 mL, all media), sensory-motor characteristics of peristaltic and EUCR reflexes were different (P < .05) between media and groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechano- and chemosensitive stimuli evoke volume-dependent specific peristaltic and UES reflexes at 33 and 36 weeks PMA. The recruitment and magnitude of these reflexes are dependent on the physicochemical properties of the stimuli in healthy premature infants.

Upstream effect of esophageal distention: effect on airway

The pharyngoesophageal segment of the foregut has an important function in steering clear of luminal contents from the airway, across the age spectrum from a premature neonate to an aging adult. This complex neuromuscular interaction between the esophagus and the airway is maintained by a variety of mechanisms mediated by the parasympathetic and sympathetic afferent and efferent outflows involving the myenteric plexus, glossopharyngeal and vagus cranial nerves, phrenic nerve, and brainstem nuclei. The esophageal provocation during gastroesophageal reflux events results in esophageal distention, followed by responses in the esophagus, the airway, or both. Studies involving esophageal provocation in human adults and animal models are beginning to illuminate the pathogenetic mechanisms associated with aerodigestive tract disease. However, studies pertinent to this topic in infants or children have been lacking. In this paper, we review recent advances concerning the motor responses of the esophagus and the airway ensuing upon esophageal distention. Recent advances in methods to evaluate aerodigestive responses in infants that have been validated are discussed.

Characteristics of upper oesophageal sphincter and oesophageal body during maturation in healthy human neonates compared with adults

We evaluated the upper oesophageal sphincter (UOS) relationship with oesophageal body during primary peristalsis (PP) sequences in healthy human neonates during maturation and compared with that of healthy adult volunteers. Forty-nine studies were performed using a water perfusion manometry system and a specially designed oesophageal catheter with a UOS sleeve concurrent with submental electromyogram in 31 subjects in supine position (18 preterm neonates, 29.9 +/- 2.5 weeks gestation; four full-term neonates, 39.3 +/- 1.0 weeks gestation; and nine adults, 18-65 years). The preterm neonates were studied longitudinally at 33 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and full-term born at 40 weeks PMA. Data were compared between the groups to recognize the effects of gestation, postnatal age and ageing. We evaluated 403 consecutive spontaneous solitary swallows during maturation (preterm at time-1 vs time-2) and growth (preterm and full-term vs adults) and observed significant (P < 0.05) differences in the basal UOS resting pressure, UOS relaxation characteristics, proximal and distal oesophageal body amplitude, duration, propagation and peristaltic velocity. Characteristics of UOS and PP are well-developed by 33 weeks PMA and undergo further maturation during the postnatal period, and are significantly different from that of adult.

Oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy in the diagnostic algorithm of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a useful exam?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy in the diagnostic approach to patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-one patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms and a control group of 15 healthy volunteers were examined. All subjects underwent standard oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy. The following parameters were considered: activity-time curves, presence of double peaks and reduced slope in oropharyngeal phase, presence of accelerated or slowed esophagogastric transit, persistence of radioactive material on the pharyngeal or esophageal mucosa, and presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) under exercise.

RESULTS

There were objective signs of laryngeal reflux in 80.5% of the patients. In 82.9%, scintigraphy documented several associated morphofunctional pathologic patterns: positive GER test (61.0%), presence of double peaks (36.6%), indirect signs of pharyngoesophageal inflammation (31.7%), hypotonic lower esophageal sphincter (17.1%), and slowed esophageal clearance (9.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy may be used as preliminary examination in outpatients with signs and symptoms of LPR. Cases of classic gastroesophageal reflux disease could be separated from those of LPR disease and therefore submitted to more invasive instrumental examinations.

Paroxysmal laryngospasm: a typical but underrecognized supraesophageal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux?

Thirty-five consecutive adult patients with paroxysmal laryngospasm (LS) and with unimpaired vocal fold mobility were prospectively studied for coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Nineteen patients reported frequent (>3 episodes a week) LS episodes (FLS patients) and 16 patients reported occasional LS episodes (OLS patients). All patients underwent an extensive otorhinolaryngological (ORL) examination, upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, ambulatory 24-hr dual-channel esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry. In addition, a subset of LS patients also underwent ambulatory duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) monitoring. Patients with daily LS used the symptom marker during pH monitoring indicating separate LS episodes. All FLS patients and 14 OLS patients (87%) had a diagnosis of GERD. Only 10 patients (29%) experienced heartburn and/or regurgitation. Compared to OLS patients, FLS patients generally had more severe GERD as indicated by a higher prevalence of a hiatus hernia, higher distal and proximal esophageal acid exposure times, and higher values of DGER. In six FLS patients, 21 LS episodes (91%) occurred simultaneously with acid reflux, indicating a causal association between LS and GER. On antireflux therapy consisting of omeprazole, 20 mg bid, or lansoprazole, 30 mg oid, and lifestyle measures, LS ceased completely in all patients within 6 weeks. The present study not only demonstrates the role of GER in the pathogenesis of LS and the effectiveness of antireflux therapy, but also suggests that LS in adult patients with unimpaired vocal fold mobility might be considered a typical, although most frequently unrecognized, supraesophageal manifestation of GER.

The yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with suspected reflux-related chronic ear, nose, and throat symptoms

OBJECTIVES

It is well established that various ENT disorders and symptoms may be a manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Erosive esophagitis is considered a rare finding in ENT patients and therefore upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is not recommended in the diagnostic work-up. However, large prospective studies underscoring this policy are lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence and severity of esophagitis in patients with suspected GERD-related chronic ENT symptoms.

METHODS

Endoscopy was performed in 405 ENT patients with suspected GERD and 545 typical GERD patients. The presence of erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, hiatal hernia, peptic ulcer, and Helicobacter pylori infection on biopsies was determined and compared with the results of a symptom questionnaire.

RESULTS

The prevalence of erosive esophagitis (52.3% vs 38.4%; p < 0.05), mainly grade 1 (31.9% vs 22.7%; p < 0.05), and of peptic ulcer (8.4% vs 4.3%; p < 0.05) was significantly higher in patients with GERD-related ENT symptoms compared to typical GERD. Barrett's mucosa occurred in, respectively, 4.9% and 4.5% of the patients (NS). Esophagitis prevalence was highest in patients with predominant cough and lowest in globus pharyngeus and throat symptoms. The presence of esophagitis was associated with significantly higher rates of symptom relief during the first 8 wk of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with suspected GERD-related ENT symptoms have a high prevalence of esophagitis and this is associated with better response to antisecretory therapy.

Esophageal body and upper esophageal sphincter motor responses to esophageal provocation during maturation in preterm newborns

OBJECTIVES

We studied the maturation of esophageal body and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) motor responses that protect against reflux in newborns.

STUDY DESIGN

The responses of esophageal body and UES on midesophageal provocation were quantified using a micromanometric water perfusion system and a specially designed catheter with a UES sleeve and 5 side-hole recording sites. Eighteen healthy premature infants were studied twice, at 33.4 weeks' and 35.7 weeks' mean postmenstrual ages (PMAs).

RESULTS

Mean threshold volumes and the distribution of responses including secondary peristalsis, UES pressure increase, and primary peristalsis were similar for air and liquids. Secondary peristalsis and UES pressure increases were volume dependent for both studies, but their characteristics changed as PMA increased in that (1) completely propagated secondary peristalsis with liquids increased; (2) proximal esophageal contraction duration was shorter for air and liquids; and (3) propagating velocity for liquids was faster.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal and UES motor responses to abrupt midesophageal provocation are present as early as 33 weeks' PMA, and the response-characteristics improve during development. Reflexes that may facilitate esophageal clearance include (1) secondary peristalsis; (2) esophago-UES-contractile reflex; and (3) esophago-deglutition response.

Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux is a physiological phenomenon, occurring with different severity and duration in different individuals. Reflux occurs when this normal event results in the occurrence of symptoms/signs or complications. The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux is complex and diverse, since it is influenced by factors that are genetic, environmental (e.g., diet smoking), anatomic, hormonal, and neurogenic. However, many mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Future research should focus on a better understanding of the physiology of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and of gastric motility. The afferent and efferent neural pathways and neuropharmacologic mediators of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastric dysmotility require further study. The role of anatomic malformations such as hiatal hernia in children has been underestimated. While therapeutic possibilities are greater in number and largely improved, the outcomes of some treatments are far from satisfactory in many cases. In addition to development of new forms of treatment, research should address better use of currently available medical and surgical treatments.