Blood capillary rarefaction and lymphatic capillary neoangiogenesis are key contributors to renal allograft fibrosis in an ACE inhibition rat model

Angiogenesis-An Emerging Role in Organ Fibrosis

In recent years, the study of lymphangiogenesis and fibrotic diseases has made considerable achievements, and accumulating evidence indicates that lymphangiogenesis plays a key role in the process of fibrosis in various organs. Although the effects of lymphangiogenesis on fibrosis disease have not been conclusively determined due to different disease models and pathological stages of organ fibrosis, its importance in the development of fibrosis is unquestionable. Therefore, we expounded on the characteristics of lymphangiogenesis in fibrotic diseases from the effects of lymphangiogenesis on fibrosis, the source of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), the mechanism of fibrosis-related lymphangiogenesis, and the therapeutic effect of intervening lymphangiogenesis on fibrosis. We found that expansion of LECs or lymphatic networks occurs through original endothelial cell budding or macrophage differentiation into LECs, and the vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR3) pathway is central in fibrosis-related lymphangiogenesis. Lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE1), as a receptor of LECs, is also involved in the regulation of lymphangiogenesis. Intervention with lymphangiogenesis improves fibrosis to some extent. In the complex organ fibrosis microenvironment, a variety of functional cells, inflammatory factors and chemokines synergistically or antagonistically form the complex network involved in fibrosis-related lymphangiogenesis and regulate the progression of fibrosis disease. Further clarifying the formation of a new fibrosis-related lymphangiogenesis network may potentially provide new strategies for the treatment of fibrosis disease.

Comprehensive analyses of the microRNA-messenger RNA-transcription factor regulatory network in mouse and human renal fibrosis

Objective: The aim of this study was to construct a microRNA (miRNA)-messenger RNA (mRNA)-transcription factor (TF) regulatory network and explore underlying molecular mechanisms, effective biomarkers, and drugs in renal fibrosis (RF). Methods: A total of six datasets were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus. "Limma" and "DESeq2" packages in R software and GEO2R were applied to identify the differentially expressed miRNAs and mRNAs (DEmiRNAs and DEmRNAs, respectively). The determination and verification of DEmiRNAs and DEmRNAs were performed through the integrated analysis of datasets from five mouse 7 days of unilateral ureteral obstruction datasets and one human chronic kidney disease dataset and the Human Protein Atlas (http://www.proteinatlas.org). Target mRNAs of DEmiRNAs and TFs were predicted by prediction databases and the iRegulon plugin in Cytoscape, respectively. A protein-protein interaction network was constructed using STRING, Cytoscape v3.9.1, and CytoNCA. Functional enrichment analysis was performed by DIANA-miRPath v3.0 and R package "clusterProfiler." A miRNA-mRNA-TF network was established using Cytoscape. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to examine the diagnostic value of the key hub genes. Finally, the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database and Drug-Gene Interaction database were applied to identify potential drugs. Results: Here, 4 DEmiRNAs and 11 hub genes were determined and confirmed in five mouse datasets, of which Bckdha and Vegfa were further verified in one human dataset and HPA, respectively. Moreover, Bckdha and Vegfa were also predicted by miR-125a-3p and miR-199a-5p, respectively, in humans as in mice. The sequences of miR-125a-3p and miR-199a-5p in mice were identical to those in humans. A total of 6 TFs were predicted to regulate Bckdha and Vegfa across mice and humans; then, a miRNA-mRNA-TF regulatory network was built. Subsequently, ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve value of Vegfa was 0.825 (p = 0.002). Finally, enalapril was identified to target Vegfa for RF therapy. Conclusion: Pax2, Pax5, Sp1, Sp2, Sp3, and Sp4 together with Bckdha-dependent miR-125a-3p/Vegfa-dependent miR-199a-5p formed a co-regulatory network enabling Bckdha/Vegfa to be tightly controlled in the underlying pathogenesis of RF across mice and humans. Vegfa could act as a potential novel diagnostic marker and might be targeted by enalapril for RF therapy.

Delayed Contralateral Nephrectomy Halted Post-Ischemic Renal Fibrosis Progression and Inhibited the Ischemia-Induced Fibromir Upregulation in Mice

(1) Background: Ischemia reperfusion (IR) is the leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) and results in predisposition to chronic kidney disease. We demonstrated that delayed contralateral nephrectomy (Nx) greatly improved the function of the IR-injured kidney and decelerated fibrosis progression. Our aim was to identify microRNAs (miRNA/miR) involved in this process. (2) Methods: NMRI mice were subjected to 30 min of renal IR and one week later to Nx/sham surgery. The experiments were conducted for 7-28 days after IR. On day 8, multiplex renal miRNA profiling was performed. Expression of nine miRNAs was determined with qPCR at all time points. Based on the target prediction, plexin-A2 and Cd2AP were measured by Western blot. (3) Results: On day 8 after IR, the expression of 20/1195 miRNAs doubled, and 9/13 selected miRNAs were upregulated at all time points. Nx reduced the expression of several ischemia-induced pro-fibrotic miRNAs (fibromirs), such as miR-142a-duplex, miR-146a-5p, miR-199a-duplex, miR-214-3p and miR-223-3p, in the injured kidneys at various time points. Plexin-A2 was upregulated by IR on day 10, while Cd2AP was unchanged. (4) Conclusion: Nx delayed fibrosis progression and decreased the expression of ischemia-induced fibromirs. The protein expression of plexin-A2 and Cd2AP is mainly regulated by factors other than miRNAs.

Renin-angiotensin system and inflammation update

The most classical view of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) emphasizes its role as an endocrine regulator of sodium balance and blood pressure. However, it has long become clear that the RAS has pleiotropic actions that contribute to organ damage, including modulation of inflammation. Angiotensin II (Ang II) activates angiotensin type 1 receptors (AT1R) to promote an inflammatory response and organ damage. This represents the pathophysiological basis for the successful use of RAS blockers to prevent and treat kidney and heart disease. However, other RAS components could have a built-in capacity to brake proinflammatory responses. Angiotensin type 2 receptor (AT2R) activation can oppose AT1R actions, such as vasodilatation, but its involvement in modulation of inflammation has not been conclusively proven. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) can process Ang II to generate angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)), that activates the Mas receptor to exert predominantly anti-inflammatory responses depending on the context. We now review recent advances in the understanding of the interaction of the RAS with inflammation. Specific topics in which novel information became available recently include intracellular angiotensin receptors; AT1R posttranslational modifications by tissue transglutaminase (TG2) and anti-AT1R autoimmunity; RAS modulation of lymphoid vessels and T lymphocyte responses, especially of Th17 and Treg responses; interactions with toll-like receptors (TLRs), programmed necrosis, and regulation of epigenetic modulators (e.g. microRNAs and bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins). We additionally discuss an often overlooked effect of the RAS on inflammation which is the downregulation of anti-inflammatory factors such as klotho, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α), transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), SNF-related serine/threonine-protein kinase (SNRK), serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 6 catalytic subunit (Ppp6C) and n-acetyl-seryl-aspartyl-lysyl-proline (Ac-SDKP). Both transcription factors, such as nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), and epigenetic regulators, such as miRNAs are involved in downmodulation of anti-inflammatory responses. A detailed analysis of pathways and targets for downmodulation of anti-inflammatory responses constitutes a novel frontier in RAS research.

Angiotensin inhibition in the developing kidney; tubulointerstitial effect

BACKGROUND

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade during nephrogenesis causes a broad range of renal mal-development. Here, we hypothesized that disruption of renal lymphangiogenesis may contribute to tubulointerstitial alterations after RAS blockade during kidney maturation.

METHODS

Newborn rat pups were treated with enalapril (30 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 7 days after birth. Lymphangiogenesis was assessed via immunostaining and/or immunoblots for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C, VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-3, Podoplanin, and Ki-67. The intrarenal expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-1, FGF-2, FGF receptor (R)-1, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and fibroblast-specific protein (FSP)-1 was also determined. Sirius Red staining was performed to evaluate interstitial collagen deposition.

RESULTS

On postnatal day 8, renal lymphangiogenesis was disrupted by neonatal enalapril treatment. The expression of podoplanin and Ki-67 decreased in enalapril-treated kidneys. While the expression of VEGF-C was decreased, the levels of VEGFR-3 receptor increased following enalapril treatment. Enalapril treatment also reduced the renal expression of FGF-1, FGF-2, and FGFR-1. Enalapril-treated kidneys exhibited profibrogenic properties with increased expression of α-SMA and FSP-1 and enhanced deposition of interstitial collagen.

CONCLUSION

Enalapril treatment during postnatal renal maturation can disrupt renal lymphangiogenesis along with tubulointerstitial changes, which may result in a pro-fibrotic environment in the developing rat kidney.

Potential lymphangiogenesis therapies: Learning from current antiangiogenesis therapies-A review

In recent years, lymphangiogenesis, the process of lymphatic vessel formation from existing lymph vessels, has been demonstrated to have a significant role in diverse pathologies, including cancer metastasis, organ graft rejection, and lymphedema. Our understanding of the mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis has advanced on the heels of studies demonstrating vascular endothelial growth factor C as a central pro-lymphangiogenic regulator and others identifying multiple lymphatic endothelial biomarkers. Despite these breakthroughs and a growing appreciation of the signaling events that govern the lymphangiogenic process, there are no FDA-approved drugs that target lymphangiogenesis. In this review, we reflect on the lessons available from the development of antiangiogenic therapies (26 FDA-approved drugs to date), review current lymphangiogenesis research including nanotechnology in therapeutic drug delivery and imaging, and discuss molecules in the lymphangiogenic pathway that are promising therapeutic targets.

Capillary rarefaction from the kidney point of view

Capillary rarefaction is broadly defined as a reduction in vascular density. Capillary rarefaction in the kidneys is thought to promote hypoxia, impair hemodynamic responses and predispose to chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and hypertension development. Various mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the development of capillary rarefaction, including inflammation, an altered endothelial-tubular epithelial cell crosstalk, a relative deficiency in angiogenic growth factors, loss of pericytes, increased activity of Transforming growth factor -β1 and thrombospondin-1, vitamin D deficiency, a link to lymphatic neoangiogenesis and INK4a/ARF (Cylin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2a; CDKN2A). In this review, we summarize the tools available to monitor capillary rarefaction noninvasively in the clinic, the contribution of capillary rarefaction to CKD and hypertension, the known mechanisms of capillary rarefaction, and potential future strategies to attenuate capillary rarefaction and reduce its negative impact. Therapeutic strategies to be explored in more detail include optimization of antihypertensive therapy, vitamin D receptor activators, sirtuin 1 activators, Hypoxia inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and stem cell therapy.