Specific binding of endothelin-1 to canine tracheal epithelial cells in culture

Endothelin-1 inhibits mucin secretion from ovine airway epithelial goblet cells

Mucus hypersecretion is a feature of several respiratory diseases and frequently leads to obstruction of small airways where the principal source of mucous glycoproteins (mucins), the major macromolecular constituents of mucus, are goblet cells. Hence, inhibition of mucin secretion from these cells may be clinically beneficial. In this study, we have developed a lectin-based assay for mucin secretion from ovine airway goblet cells and used this assay to investigate the regulation of these cells by endothelin (ET)-1. ET-1 inhibited baseline mucin secretion (maximum inhibition: 60.3 +/- 4.2%, 50% inhibitory concentration: 0.8 +/- 0.17 nM). This response was abolished by the ET(A) antagonist, BQ-123 (1 muM), but not by the ET(B) antagonist, BQ-788 (1 muM). ET-1 (1 muM) did not affect mucin secretion stimulated by ATP (100 muM) but secretion in response to ATP (10 muM) was inhibited by 63.3 +/- 11.8%. This response could be eliminated by BQ-123, but not by BQ-788. Radioligand binding and immunohistochemistry indicated the expression of both ET(A)- and ET(B)-receptors on the epithelium. In summary, ET-1, acting via ET(A)-receptors, inhibits baseline and ATP-stimulated mucin secretion from ovine airway goblet cells. This represents the first report of a physiologic mechanism for inhibiting airway goblet cell mucin secretion; an understanding of this mechanism may provide opportunities for the treatment of obstructive airways disease.

Modulation of ET-1-induced contraction of human bronchi by airway epithelium-dependent nitric oxide release via ET(A) receptor activation

1. The purpose of this work was to investigate whether endothelin-1 (ET-1) was able to induce the release of an inhibitory factor from the airway epithelium in isolated human bronchi and to identify this mediator as well as the endothelin receptor involved in this phenomenon. 2. In intact bronchi, ET-1 induced a concentration-dependent contraction (-logEC50 = 7.92+/-0.09, n = 18) which was potentiated by epithelium removal (-logEC50 = 8.65+/-0.11, n = 17). BQ-123 , an ET(A) receptor antagonist, induced a significant leftward shift of the ET-1 concentration-response curve (CRC). This leftward shift was abolished after epithelium removal. 3. L-NAME (3 x 10(-3) M), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, induced a significant leftward shift of the ET-1 CRC, and abolished the potentiation by BQ-123 (10(-8) M) of ET-1-induced contraction. 4. In intact preparations, the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 induced only at 10(-5) M a slight rightward shift of the ET-1 CRC. In contrast, in epithelium-denuded bronchi or in intact preparations in the presence of L-NAME, BQ-788 displayed a non-competitive antagonism toward ET-1-induced contraction. 5. IRL 1620, a selective ET(B) receptor agonist, induced a contraction of the isolated bronchus (-logEC50=7.94+/-0.11, n= 19). This effect was not modified by epithelium removal or by BQ-123. BQ-788 exerted a competitive antagonism against IRL 1620 which was similar in the presence or absence of epithelium. 6. These results show that ET-1 exerts two opposite effects on the human airway smooth muscle. One is contractile via ETB-receptor activation, the other is inhibitory and responsible of NO release which counteracts via ETA-receptor activation the contraction.

Prostanoids counterbalance the bronchoconstrictor activity of endothelin-1 in pigs

In 12 anaesthetized spontaneously breathing pigs divided into two groups of six animals we evaluated the respiratory and haemodynamic responses to endothelin-1 (ET-1) administered by aerosol (200 pmol x kg(-1) in 1 ml of saline solution). In the first group (control group), the responses to ET-1 were evaluated before and after the blocking of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME 5 mg x kg(-1), i.v.). In the second group (indomethacin-pretreated group), the experimental protocol was similar to that of the control group, but the responses were evaluated after the blocking of endogenous prostanoids by indomethacin (3 mg x kg(-1), i.v.). Results show that in the control group ET-1 administered before and after L-NAME did not change compliance (Crs) or resistances (Rrs) of the respiratory system. In indomethacin-pretreated pigs, ET-1 significantly increased Rrs and decreased Crs. This constrictor effect appearing only during the block of arachidonic acid metabolites showed that ET-1 activity can be counterbalanced by a release of dilator prostanoids. In this group after L-NAME pretreatment ET-1 did not alter the mechanical properties of the respiratory system, suggesting an involvement of other bronchodilator mechanisms. In the control group, aerosol administered ET-1 increased mean systemic (MAP) and pulmonary (MPAP) arterial pressures, while when ET-1 was administered after L-NAME pretreatment, MPAP decreased. In the indomethacin-pretreated group, the peptide did not modify MAP, but caused an early decrease in MPAP when administered after L-NAME. Therefore, our results show that ET-1 caused a bronchoconstrictor effect only in indomethacin-pretreated pigs and suggest that the intrinsic constrictor activity of the peptide can be modulated especially by the release of dilator prostanoids.

Non-epithelial endothelin-A receptors activate adenylate cyclase in rat trachea: biochemical mechanisms and physiological implications

In the present study, we investigated the mechanisms underlying the differential effects of endothelins (ETs) in the rat trachea. Sarafotoxin-S6c (SRTX-c) and ET-3 were more potent spasmogens to rat tracheal strips than ET-1. The EC50 values were 12, 14.1 and 89.1 nM, respectively. Tension responses to ET-1 and ET-3, but not to SRTX-c, were enhanced by either indomethacin or the ET(A) blocker, BQ-610 (1 microM). In epithelium-intact tracheal rings, both ET-1 and ET-3 activated adenylate cyclase (AC) in a concentration-dependent manner. The activation by ET-1 of AC was significantly higher than that of ET-3. Thus, EC50 values for ET-1 and ET-3 were 71 and 200 nM, and maximal cAMP increments were 196% and 62% above baseline, respectively. SRTX-c, up to 1 microM, did not alter basal cAMP level. Mechanical removal of the epithelium neither had an effect on AC activation by ET-1 or ET-3, nor did it alter the inability of SRTX-c to modulate AC activity. Conversely, pre-incubation of tracheal strips with indomethacin (1 microM) virtually ablated the increments in cAMP by the ETs. Likewise, BQ-610 attenuated AC activation, concentration-dependently (IC50=28.2 nM). Taken together, the present study suggests that ET(A) receptors, from non-epithelial source, are functionally-linked to AC activation via a prostanoid-dependent pathway. This ET(A)-initiated cascade acts to negatively regulate muscle contraction. Such a cross-talk between ET signals most likely accounts for variation of tension responses to ET homologs.

Endothelins-induce cyclicAMP formation in the guinea-pig trachea through an ETA receptor- and cyclooxygenase-dependent mechanism

1. The non-selective endothelin agonist, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and the selective ETB receptor agonist, sarafotoxin-S6c (SRTX-c), contracted guinea-pig isolated trachea in a concentration-dependent manner. The EC50 value for ET-1 (11 +/- 2.1 nM) was significantly higher than that of SRTX-c (3.2 +/- 0.21 nM) and the maximal developed tension due to SRTX-c was 42.8 +/- 2.3% higher than that produced by ET-1 (P < 0.05). 2. Pretreatment with the ETA antagonist, BQ-610, appreciably enhanced the developed tension due to ET-1 but not SRTX-c. Likewise, the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin, markedly potentiated the contractile responses to ET-1, but not to SRTX-c. Combining BQ-610 with indomethacin was not more effective than either of them in augmenting ET-1-evoked tension. 3. ET-1 significantly increased cyclic AMP formation in the trachea in concentration- and time-dependent manners. A t1/2 value of 4.3 min, an EC50 value of 20 +/- 3 nM and a maximal cyclic AMP increment of 124% above the basal level, were obtained for ET-1. Similarly but less effectively, ET-3 (0.1 microM) increased cyclic AMP level (35 +/- 3.7% compared to 94 +/- 7.8% for the same concentration of ET-1). By contrast, SRTX-c did not alter the cyclicAMP level when applied in concentrations up to 1 microM. 4. Pre-incubation of the trachea with BQ-610 (1 microM) or indomethacin (1 microM) prevented cyclicAMP formation by either ET-1 or ET-3. 5. The results of the present study indicate a negative regulatory role mediated by the ETA receptor on the ETB-triggered mechanical response. This effect is likely to be mediated by activation of adenylate cyclase through a cyclo-oxygenase-dependent mechanism.