Long-term heart transplant recipients: heart rate-related effects on augmented transfer function coherence during repeated squat-stand maneuvers in males

A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression amalgamating the driven approaches used to quantify dynamic cerebral autoregulation

Numerous driven techniques have been utilized to assess dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) in healthy and clinical populations. The current review aimed to amalgamate this literature and provide recommendations to create greater standardization for future research. The PubMed database was searched with inclusion criteria consisting of original research articles using driven dCA assessments in humans. Risk of bias were completed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Meta-analyses were conducted for coherence, phase, and gain metrics at 0.05 and 0.10 Hz using deep-breathing, oscillatory lower body negative pressure (OLBNP), sit-to-stand maneuvers, and squat-stand maneuvers. A total of 113 studies were included, with 40 of these incorporating clinical populations. A total of 4126 participants were identified, with younger adults (18-40 years) being the most studied population. The most common techniques were squat-stands (n = 43), deep-breathing (n = 25), OLBNP (n = 20), and sit-to-stands (n = 16). Pooled coherence point estimates were: OLBNP 0.70 (95%CI:0.59-0.82), sit-to-stands 0.87 (95%CI:0.79-0.95), and squat-stands 0.98 (95%CI:0.98-0.99) at 0.05 Hz; and deep-breathing 0.90 (95%CI:0.81-0.99); OLBNP 0.67 (95%CI:0.44-0.90); and squat-stands 0.99 (95%CI:0.99-0.99) at 0.10 Hz. This review summarizes clinical findings, discusses the pros/cons of the 11 unique driven techniques included, and provides recommendations for future investigations into the unique physiological intricacies of dCA.

Daily rhythm of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in patients after stroke

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) in healthy young adults displays a daily variation. Whether the rhythm exists in patients with stroke is unknown. We studied 28 stroke patients (age: 26-83 years, 7 females) within 48 hours after thrombolysis. dCA was assessed 54 times in these patients during supine rest (twice in 26 and once in 2 patients): 9 assessments between 0-9AM, 12 between 9AM-2PM, 20 between 2-7PM, and 13 between 7PM-12AM. To estimate dCA, phase shifts between spontaneous oscillations of cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) in the middle cerebral artery and arterial blood pressure (BP) were obtained in four frequency bands: <0.05 Hz, 0.05-0.1 Hz, 0.1-0.2 Hz, and >0.2 Hz. CBFV-BP phase shifts at <0.05 Hz were significantly larger between 2-7PM, suggesting better dCA, than those at other times (p < 0.0001), and the daily rhythm was consistent for stroke and non-stroke sides. No significant rhythms were observed at higher frequencies (all p > 0.2). All results were independent of age, sex, stroke type and severity, and other cardiovascular conditions. dCA after stroke showed a daily rhythm, leading to a better regulation of CBFV at <0.05 Hz during the afternoon. The finding may have implications for daily activity management of stroke patients.

Repetitive bout of controlled soccer heading does not alter heart rate variability metrics: A preliminary investigation

Objectives

There is elevated unease regarding how repetitive head impacts, such as those associated with soccer heading, contribute to alterations in brain function. This study examined the extent heart rate variability (HRV) and cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) metrics are altered immediately following an acute bout of soccer heading.

Methods

Seven male elite soccer players (24.1 ± 1.5 years) completed 40 successful soccer headers in 20-min. The headers were performed under controlled circumstances using a soccer ball launcher located 25 meters away and using an initial ball velocity of 77.5 ± 3.7 km/h (heading condition). An accelerometer (xPatch) on the right mastoid process quantified linear/rotational head accelerations. Participants also completed sham (body contact) and control (non-contact) sessions. A three-lead ECG and finger photoplethysmography characterized short-term spontaneous HRV/cardiac BRS, before and after each condition. The SCAT3 indexed symptom scores pre-post exposures to all three conditions.

Results

During the heading condition, cumulative linear and rotational accelerations experienced were 1,574 ± 97.9 g and 313,761 ± 23,966 rad/s², respectively. Heart rate trended toward an increase from pre- to post-heading (p = 0.063), however HRV metrics in the time-domain (ps > 0.260) and frequency-domain (ps > 0.327) as well as cardiac BRS (ps > 0.144) were not significantly changed following all three conditions. Following the heading condition, SCAT3 symptom severity increased (p = 0.030) with a trend for symptom score augmentation (p = 0.078) compared to control and sham.

Conclusion

Whereas, symptoms as measured by the SCAT3 were induced following an acute bout of controlled soccer heading, these preliminary findings indicate they were not accompanied by alterations to autonomic function. Ultimately, this demonstrates further research is needed to understand the physiological underpinnings of alterations in brain function occurring immediately after a bout of soccer heading and how these may, over time, contribute to long-term neurological impairments.

On the use and misuse of cerebral hemodynamics terminology using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: a call for standardization

Cerebral hemodynamics (e.g., cerebral blood flow) can be measured and quantified using many different methods, with Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) being one of the most commonly utilized approaches. In human physiology, the terminology used to describe metrics of cerebral hemodynamics are inconsistent, and in some instances technically inaccurate; this is especially true when evaluating, reporting, and interpreting measures from TCD. Therefore, this perspectives article presents recommended terminology when reporting cerebral hemodynamic data. We discuss the current use and misuse of the terminology in the context of using TCD to measure and quantify cerebral hemodynamics and present our rationale and consensus on the terminology that we recommend moving forward. For example, one recommendation is to discontinue use of the term "cerebral blood flow velocity" in favor of "cerebral blood velocity" with precise indication of the vessel of interest. We also recommend clarity when differentiating between discrete cerebrovascular regulatory mechanisms, namely cerebral autoregulation, neurovascular coupling, and cerebrovascular reactivity. This will be a useful guide for investigators in the field of cerebral hemodynamics research.