Nifedipine-induced inhibition of parasympathetic-mediated vasodilation in the orofacial areas of the cat

Effects of isoflurane on parasympathetic vasodilatation in the rat submandibular gland

Volatile anesthetics have been known to suppress parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation in the lower lip and palate. However, in the submandibular gland, little is known about the effects of these anesthetics on the parasympathetic vasodilatation elicited by reflex and direct (i.e., non-reflex) activation of the parasympathetic vasodilator mechanisms. Although both parasympathetic vasodilatations were inhibited by isoflurane in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, the effects of continuous administration of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist methoxamine were markedly different: The reflex vasodilatation was not affected by methoxamine, while the direct vasodilatation was significantly reduced. Picrotoxin (GABA(A) receptor antagonist) attenuated the inhibitory effect of isoflurane on direct vasodilatation and the systemic arterial blood pressure. These findings suggest that the isoflurane-induced inhibitory effects on direct vasodilatation are produced by a decrease of peripheral vascular tone by GABAergic mechanisms, whereas those on the reflex vasodilatation are produced exclusively by the inhibition of the reflex center.

Suppression of inferior alveolar nerve-induced vasoconstrictor response by ongoing cervical sympathetic nerve activity in cat

We examined the effects of ongoing cervical sympathetic trunk (CST) stimulation on the vasoconstrictor responses in the lower lip elicited by electrical stimulation (ES) of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) or CST in anaesthetised cats to determine whether (i) the previously reported suppressive effect of ongoing CST activity on IAN-induced vasoconstriction occurs during not only ipsilateral, but also contralateral CST stimulation; and (ii) a vasoconstriction can be elicited by brief CST stimulation during ongoing stimulation of the contralateral CST. The central lower lip blood vessels are innervated by both left and right CST. The fall in central lip blood flow (LBF) elicited by IAN stimulation alone was reduced in a frequency-dependent manner during concurrent CST stimulation at 0.2-2 Hz, and at the high end of this frequency range was transformed to a rise regardless of whether the CST stimulation was ipsilateral or contralateral to the IAN stimulation. The fall in central LBF elicited by stimulation of one CST was not transformed to a rise by ongoing stimulation of the contralateral CST. Possibly, IAN-evoked orofacial vasoconstriction does not occur under physiological conditions (unlike IAN-evoked vasodilatation) because it is suppressed by the spontaneous sympathetic discharge in CST.

Comparison of once-daily nifedipine controlled-release with twice-daily nifedipine retard in the treatment of essential hypertension

AIMS

Nifedipine is a short-acting calcium antagonist formulated into several different oral preparations, each of which may have different effects on haemodynamics and autonomic nervous function. We compared the effects of nifedipine controlled-release (CR) and nifedipine retard on 24-h blood pressure, heart rate, rate-pressure product, and power spectral measures of heart rate variability in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

After 4 weeks of a drug-free period, 25 patients were randomized to receive either once-daily treatment with nifedipine CR (20-40 mg daily; 12 patients) or twice-daily treatment with nifedipine retard (20-40 mg daily; 13 patients) for 12 weeks. The ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and ECG R-R intervals were measured during a 24-h period using a portable recorder (TM-2425) at the end of the drug-free and the treatment periods. A power-spectral analysis of R-R intervals was performed to obtain the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components.

RESULTS

Nifedipine CR and nifedipine retard reduced 24-h blood pressure significantly by 15.9 +/- 3.2 (SE)/8.7 +/- 1.4 mmHg and by 10.9 +/- 2.8/9.4 +/- 1.7 mmHg, respectively, after the 12-week treatment. Nifedipine CR did not change the 24-h heart rate significantly, while nifedipine retard increased it significantly by 3.9 +/- 2.1 beats min(-1). Nifedipine CR produced a significant reduction in rate-pressure product throughout a 24-h period, while nifedipine retard did not change the rate-pressure product significantly. In addition, nifedipine retard significantly decreased the 24-h and daytime average values of the LF and HF components, while nifedipine CR affected the nighttime LF component alone and did not change the HF component throughout a 24-h period.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that both nifedipine CR and nifedipine retard are effective as antihypertensive agents, but nifedipine CR has less influence on the autonomic nervous system and heart rate than nifedipine retard.

Trigeminal nerve-mediated reflex arterial blood pressure decrease and vasodilatation in lower lip of the rabbit

We measured the effects of electrical stimulation of the central cut end of the lingual nerve on lower lip blood flow (LBF) and on arterial blood pressure in urethane-anesthetized, artificially ventilated, cervically vagosympathectomized rabbits. Different effects were observed depending on the stimulus frequency. Increasing the stimulus frequency above 5 Hz produced progressively larger ipsilateral LBF increases until the optimal frequency was reached at 20 Hz. In contrast, stimulation at above 0.5 Hz evoked progressively larger decreases in both contralateral LBF and arterial blood pressure until the optimal frequency was reached at around 10 and 2 Hz, respectively. Thus, the optimal stimulus frequencies for the ipsilateral LBF increase and the arterial blood pressure decrease were widely different. The lingual nerve-evoked change (i.e., fall) in arterial blood pressure showed a significant correlation with the contralateral LBF decrease, but not with the ipsilateral LBF increase. Prior administration of hexamethonium at 10 mg/kg markedly reduced both the ipsilateral LBF increase and arterial blood pressure decrease, although it was more effective against the former than against the latter. Pretreatment with scopolamine (muscarinic-receptor antagonist, 0.1 mg/kg), phentolamine (alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, 0.1 mg/kg), or propranolol (beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, 0.1 mg/kg) failed to affect either response. However, 1.0 mg/kg phentolamine significantly reduced both responses (P<0.05). These results indicate that, in the rabbit, the LN-evoked reflex increase in ipsilateral LBF is (a) largely independent of any concomitant arterial blood pressure change and (b) probably due to active vasodilatation mediated via parasympathetic mechanisms. In contrast, the evoked decrease in contralateral LBF was proportional to the decrease in arterial blood pressure, suggesting that the former was secondary to the latter.

Simultaneous measurement of parasympathetic reflex vasodilator and arterial blood pressure responses in the cat

We measured the changes in lower lip blood flow and systemic arterial blood pressure evoked by lingual nerve or trigeminal spinal nucleus (Vsp) stimulation to gain an insight into the brainstem integration of sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to nociceptive stimulation. We used artificially ventilated, cervically vago-sympathectomized cats deeply anesthetized with alpha-chloralose and urethane. A lip blood flow increase occurred in an intensity- and frequency-dependent manner following electrical stimulation of Vsp or lingual nerve regardless of whether systemic arterial blood pressure increased or decreased. In contrast, there was no apparent optimal frequency for the changes in systemic arterial blood pressure elicited by electrical stimulation of Vsp or lingual nerve. No relationship was found between the amplitude of the lip blood flow increase and that of the systemic arterial blood pressure change. Microinjection of lidocaine or kainic acid into the Vsp evoked, respectively, reversible and irreversible inhibition of the lip blood flow increase and systemic arterial blood pressure change evoked by lingual nerve stimulation. When microinjected unilaterally directly into the ipsilateral Vsp, the GABA agonist muscimol abolished both lingual nerve-evoked effects (increase in lip blood flow and changes in systemic arterial blood pressure) without changing basal systemic arterial blood pressure, suggesting the presence in the Vsp of GABA receptors serving to modulate both the parasympathetically mediated lip blood flow increase and the sympathetically mediated systemic arterial blood pressure change. Lidocaine microinjection into the salivatory nucleus caused a significant attenuation of the lingual nerve-induced blood flow increase, but had no effect on the lingual nerve-induced systemic arterial blood pressure change. Thus, the neural pathway mediating the lingual nerve-induced lip blood flow increase seems to be simple, requiring a minimum of four neurons: trigeminal afferent-Vsp-parasympathetic pre-ganglionic neurons with cell body located in the inferior salivatory nucleus-otic postganglionic neuron. On the other hand, the pathway underlying the evoked systemic arterial blood pressure changes, presumably mediated via altered sympathetic activity, seems to be more complicated and could be affected by more numerous factors.

Involvement of trigeminal spinal nucleus in parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation in cat lower lip

We examined whether the trigeminal spinal nucleus (Vsp) forms part of the central mechanism by which electrical stimulation of the central cut end of the lingual nerve (LN) evokes parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation in the lower lip in artificially ventilated, cervically vagosympathectomized cats deeply anesthetized with alpha-chloralose and urethane. For this purpose, we made microinjections within the brain stem to produce nonselective, reversible local anesthesia (lidocaine) or soma-selective, irreversible neurotoxic damage (kainic acid). Local anesthesia of Vsp by microinjection of lidocaine (2%; 1 microl/site) reversibly and significantly reduced the ipsilateral-LN-evoked parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation. Unilateral microinjection of kainic acid (10 mM/site; 1 microl) into Vsp ipsilateral to the stimulated LN led to an irreversible reduction in the reflex vasodilatation but had no effect on the vasodilatation elicited by stimulation of the contralateral LN. Such microinjection of kainic acid into Vsp had no effect on the vasodilatation evoked by electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral inferior salivatory nucleus. Electrical stimulation of Vsp elicited a blood flow increase in the lower lip in an intensity- and frequency-dependent manner, regardless of whether systemic arterial blood pressure rose or fell. Hexamethonium (1.0 mg/kg iv) significantly reduced the vasodilator responses elicited by electrical stimulation of the central cut end of LN or of Vsp, each to a similar degree. After hexamethonium, both vasodilator responses showed time-dependent recovery. These results strongly suggest that Vsp is an important bulbar relay for LN-evoked parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation in the cat lower lip.