Acute G-CSF therapy is not protective during lethal E. coli sepsis

In canine bacterial pneumonia circulating granulocyte counts determine outcome from donor cells

BACKGROUND

In experimental canine septic shock, depressed circulating granulocyte counts were associated with a poor outcome and increasing counts with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improved outcome. Therapeutic G-CSF, in contrast, did not improve circulating counts or outcome, and therefore investigation was undertaken to determine whether transfusing granulocytes therapeutically would improve outcome.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-eight purpose-bred beagles underwent an intrabronchial Staphylococcus aureus challenge and 4 hours later were randomly assigned to granulocyte (40-100 × 109 cells) or plasma transfusion.

RESULTS

Granulocyte transfusion significantly expanded the low circulating counts for hours compared to septic controls but was not associated with significant mortality benefit (1/14, 7% vs. 2/14, 14%, respectively; p = 0.29). Septic animals with higher granulocyte count at 4 hours (median [interquartile range] of 3.81 3.39-5.05] vs. 1.77 [1.25-2.50]) had significantly increased survival independent of whether they were transfused with granulocytes. In a subgroup analysis, animals with higher circulating granulocyte counts receiving donor granulocytes had worsened lung injury compared to septic controls. Conversely, donor granulocytes decreased lung injury in septic animals with lower counts.

CONCLUSION

During bacterial pneumonia, circulating counts predict the outcome of transfusing granulocytes. With low but normal counts, transfusing granulocytes does not improve survival and injures the lung, whereas for animals with very low counts, but not absolute neutropenia, granulocyte transfusion improves lung function.

Modulation of Innate Immunity by G-CSF and Inflammatory Response by LBPK95A Improves the Outcome of Sepsis in a Rat Model

Introduction

Sepsis is the primary cause of death from infection. We wanted to improve the outcome of sepsis by stimulating innate immunity in combination with modulating the severity of inflammatory responses in rats.

Method

Sepsis was induced by the injection of feces suspension (control). A 5-day course of G-CSF treatment was given before the septic insult (G-CSF). The inflammatory response was decreased using various doses of the LPS-blocking peptide LBPK95A (5 mg/kg = 100% Combi group, 0.5 mg/kg = 10% Combi group, and 0.05 mg/kg = 1% Combi group). Survival rates were observed. Bacterial clearance, neutrophil infiltration, tissue damage, and the induction of hepatic and systemic inflammatory responses were determined 2 h and 12 h after the septic insult.

Results

High-dose LBPK95A (100% Combi) reduced the survival rate to 10%, whereas low-dose LBPK95A (10% and 1% Combi) increased the survival rates to 50% and 80%, respectively. The survival rates inversely correlated with multiorgan damage as indicated by the serum levels of ALT and urea. G-CSF treatment increased the white blood cell counts, hepatic neutrophil infiltration, and bacterial clearance in the liver, lung, and blood. The blockade of the LPS-LBP interaction decreased neutrophil infiltration, led to increased white blood cell count, and decreased hepatic neutrophil infiltration, irrespective of dose. However, bacterial clearance improved in the 1% and 10% Combi groups but worsened in the 100% Combi group. G-CSF increased TNF-α and IL-6 levels. Irrespective of dose, the blockade of the LPS-LBP interaction was associated with low systemic cytokine levels and delayed increases in hepatic TNF-α and IL-6 mRNA expression. The delayed increase in cytokines was associated with the phosphorylation of STAT3 and AKT.

Conclusion

Our results revealed that increasing innate immunity by G-CSF pretreatment and decreasing inflammatory responses using LBPK95A improved the survival rates in a rat sepsis model and could be a novel strategy to treat sepsis.

Early enhanced local neutrophil recruitment in peritonitis-induced sepsis improves bacterial clearance and survival

Neutrophils are critical for the rapid eradication of bacterial pathogens, but they also contribute to the development of multiple organ failure in sepsis. We hypothesized that increasing early recruitment of neutrophils to the focus of infection will increase bacterial clearance and improve survival. Sepsis was induced in mice, using cecal ligation and puncture (CLP); blood samples were collected at 6 and 24 h; and survival was followed for 28 d. In separate experiments, peritoneal bacteria and inflammatory cells were measured. Septic mice predicted to die based on IL-6 levels (Die-P) had higher concentrations of CXCL1 and CXCL2 in the peritoneum and plasma compared with those predicted to live (Live-P). At 6 h, Live-P and Die-P had equivalent numbers of peritoneal neutrophils and bacteria. In Die-P mice the number of peritoneal bacteria increased between 6 and 24 h post-CLP, whereas in Live-P it decreased. The i.p. injection of CXCL1 and CXCL2 in naive mice resulted in local neutrophil recruitment. When given immediately after CLP, CXC chemokines increased peritoneal neutrophil recruitment at 6 h after CLP. This early increase in neutrophils induced by exogenous chemokines resulted in significantly fewer peritoneal bacteria by 24 h [CFU (log) = 6.04 versus 4.99 for vehicle versus chemokine treatment; p < 0.05]. Chemokine treatment significantly improved survival at both 5 d (40 versus 72%) and 28 d (27 versus 52%; p < 0.02 vehicle versus chemokines). These data demonstrate that early, local treatment with CXC chemokines enhances neutrophil recruitment and clearance of bacteria as well as improves survival in the CLP model of sepsis.

Norepinephrine increases blood pressure but not survival with anthrax lethal toxin in rats

OBJECTIVES

The response of anthrax lethal toxin (LeTx) induced shock and lethality to conventional therapies has received little study. Previously, fluids worsened outcome in LeTx-challenged rats in contrast to its benefit with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or Escherichia coli. The current study investigated norepinephrine treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 232) weighing between 230 and 250 g were challenged with similar lethal (80%) 24-hour infusions of either LPS or LeTx, or with diluent only. Toxin-challenged animals were also randomized to receive 24-hour infusions with one of three doses of norepinephrine (0.03, 0.3, or 3.0 microg/kg/min) or placebo started 1 hour after initiation of challenge. All toxin animals received similar volumes of fluid over the 24 hours (equivalent to 4.0-4.3 mL/kg/hr). Although the intermediate norepinephrine dose (0.3 microg/kg/min for 24 hours) improved survival with LPS (p = 0.04) and increased blood pressure before the onset of lethality with LeTx (p < 0.0001), it did not improve survival with the latter (p = ns). Furthermore, neither increasing nor decreasing norepinephrine doses improved survival with LeTx.

CONCLUSION

Hypotension with LeTx may not be a primary cause of lethality in this model. Rather, LeTx may cause direct cellular injury insensitive to vasopressors. These findings suggest that during anthrax infection and shock, along with hemodynamic support, toxin-directed treatments may be necessary as well.

Caecal ligation and puncture in the rat mimics the pathophysiological changes in human sepsis and causes multi-organ dysfunction

Sepsis is a major clinical challenge that is associated with encephalopathy and multi-organ dysfunction. Current therapeutic interventions are relatively ineffective and the development of novel treatments is hampered by the lack of a well-characterised animal model. Therefore, the behavioural, metabolic, physiological and histological changes resulting from 'through and through' caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in the rat were investigated to determine its suitability as an animal model of human sepsis. CLP resulted in bacteraemia, characterised by the presence of multiple enteric species within 18-20 h. Locomotor activity was reduced within 4 h of CLP and this reduction increased with time. Pyrexia was evident 4-5 h after CLP and was followed by hypothermia beginning 17 h after intervention. CLP resulted in reduced white blood cell and platelet counts and an increased neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio within 18-20 h. It also resulted in decreased blood glucose, but not lactate levels. CLP caused histopathological changes in the cerebral cortex, liver, lungs and vascular system indicative of multi-organ dysfunction. Therefore, CLP in the rat mimics the cardinal clinical features of human sepsis and the subsequent development of multi-organ dysfunction. It appears to be the best available animal model currently available, in which to investigate the underlying pathophysiology of sepsis and identify therapeutic targets.

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase deficiency decreases survival in bacterial peritonitis and sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS1) in murine polymicrobial peritonitis and sepsis.

DESIGN

Randomized experimental trial.

SETTING

Animal research facility.

SUBJECTS

B6129S NOS1+/+ and B6;129S4 NOS-/- mice.

INTERVENTIONS

NOS1+/+ and NOS1-/- animals underwent cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) or sham surgery and received the NOS1 inhibitor 7-nitroindazole (7-NI) or vehicle.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After CLP, genetic deficiency and pharmacologic inhibition of NOS1 significantly increased risk of mortality [8.69 (3.27, 23.1), p<0.0001 and 1.71 (1.00, 2.92) p=0.05, hazard ratio of death (95% confidence interval) for NOS1-/- and 7-NI-treated NOS1+/+ respectively] compared with NOS1+/+ animals. In 7-NI-treated NOS1+/+ animals, there were increases (6 h) and then decreases (24 h), whereas in NOS-/- animals persistent increases in blood bacteria counts (p=0.04 for differing effects of 7-NI and NOS1-/-) were seen compared with NOS1(+/+) animals. After CLP, NOS1(-/-) had upregulation of inducible NOS and proinflammatory cytokines and greater increases in serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 levels compared with NOS1+/+ mice (all p<0.05). Following CLP, there were similar significant decreases in circulating leukocytes and lung lavage cells (p

CONCLUSIONS

Deficiency and inhibition of NOS1 increases mortality, possibly by increasing proinflammatory cytokine response and impairing bacterial clearance after CLP. These data suggest that NOS1 is important for survival, bacterial clearance, and regulation of cytokine response during infection and sepsis.

Collapse

Key Words

• sepsis
• peritonitis
• nos1
• nnos
• no
• rodents

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Animals
• Female
• Gene Expression
• Mice
• Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I/adverse effects
• Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I/analysis
• Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I/deficiency
• Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I/genetics
• Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I/metabolism
• Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I/pharmacology
• Peritonitis/mortality
• Peritonitis/physiopathology
• Random Allocation
• Risk Assessment
• Sepsis/mortality
• Sepsis/physiopathology
• Survival Analysis
• United States

Collapse

Grants

• Z01 CL008047 Intramural NIH HHS
• Z01 CL008047-06 Intramural NIH HHS
• Z01 CL009009 Intramural NIH HHS
• Z01 CL009009-01 Intramural NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Xizhong Cui Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Virginia Besch
Alfia Khaibullina
Adrienne Hergen
Martha Quezado
Peter Eichacker
Zenaide M N Quezado

Collapse

A canine model of septic shock: balancing animal welfare and scientific relevance

A shock canine pneumonia model that permitted relief of discomfort with the use of objective criteria was developed and validated. After intrabronchial Staphylococcus aureus challenge, mechanical ventilation, antibiotics, fluids, vasopressors, sedatives, and analgesics were titrated based on algorithms for 96 h. Increasing S. aureus (1 to 8 x 10(9) colony-forming units/kg) produced decreasing survival rates (P = 0.04). From 4 to 96 h, changes in arterial-alveolar oxygen gradients, mean pulmonary artery pressure, IL-1, serum sodium levels, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor support were ordered based on survival time [acute nonsurvivors (< or =24 h until death, n = 8) > or = subacute nonsurvivors (>24 to 96 h until death, n = 8) > or = survivors (> or =96 h until death, n = 22) (all P < 0.05)]. In the first 12 h, increases in lactate and renal abnormalities were greatest in acute nonsurvivors (all P < 0.05). Compared with survivors, subacute nonsurvivors had greater rises in cytokines and liver enzymes and greater falls in platelets, white cell counts, pH, and urine output from 24 to 96 h (all P < 0.05). Importantly, these changes were not attributable to dosages of sedation, which decreased in nonsurvivors [survivors vs. nonsurvivors: 5.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.8 +/- 0.7 ml x h(-1) x (fentanyl/midazolam/ medetomidine)(-1); P = 0.02]. In this model, the pain control regimen did not mask changes in metabolic function and lung injury or the need for more hemodynamic and pulmonary support related to increasing severity of sepsis. The integration into this model of both specific and supportive titrated therapies routinely used in septic patients may provide a more realistic setting to evaluate therapies for sepsis.

Neutrophils in development of multiple organ failure in sepsis

Multiple organ failure is a major threat to the survival of patients with sepsis and systemic inflammation. In the UK and in the USA, mortality rates are currently comparable with and projected to exceed those from myocardial infarction. The immune system combats microbial infections but, in severe sepsis, its untoward activity seems to contribute to organ dysfunction. In this Review we propose that an inappropriate activation and positioning of neutrophils within the microvasculature contributes to the pathological manifestations of multiple organ failure. We further suggest that targeting neutrophils and their interactions with blood vessel walls could be a worthwhile therapeutic strategy for sepsis.

THE EFFECTS OF GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN PRECLINICAL MODELS OF INFECTION AND ACUTE INFLAMMATION

The cytokine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a potent endogenous trigger for the release of neutrophils from bone marrow stores and for their activation for enhanced antimicrobial activity. G-CSF has been widely evaluated in preclinical models of acute illness, with generally promising though divergent results. A recombinant G-CSF molecule has recently undergone clinical trials to assess its efficacy as an adjuvant therapy in community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia, however, these studies failed to provide convincing evidence of benefit. We undertook a systematic review of the published literature reporting the effects of modulation of G-CSF in preclinical in vivo models to determine whether evidence of differential efficacy might explain the disappointing results of human studies and point to disease states that might be more likely to benefit from G-CSF therapy. G-CSF has been evaluated in 86 such studies involving a variety of different models. The strongest evidence of benefit was seen in studies involving intraperitoneal challenge with live organisms; benefit was evident whether the agent was given before or after challenge. G-CSF demonstrates anti-inflammatory activity in models of systemic challenge with viable organisms or endotoxin, but only when the agent is given before challenge; evidence of benefit after challenge was minimal. Preclinical models of intrapulmonary challenge only show efficacy when the cytokine is administered before the infectious challenge, and suggested harm in gram-negative pneumonia resulting from challenge with Escherichia coli or Klebsiella. There is little evidence for therapeutic efficacy in noninfectious models of acute illness. We conclude that the most promising populations for evaluation of G-CSF are neutropenic patients with invasive infection and patients with intra-abdominal infection, particularly those with the syndrome of tertiary, or recurrent, peritonitis. Significant variability in the design and reporting of studies of preclinical models of acute illness precludes more sophisticated data synthesis.

Effect of recombinant murine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without fluoroquinolone therapy on mixed-infection abscesses in mice

The aim of the study was to determine if immunomodulation of host defense with recombinant murine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) improves the efficacy of trovafloxacin or moxifloxacin in abscesses containing Bacillus fragilis ATCC 23745 and different Escherichia coli strains varying in virulence. Treatment of mice inoculated with 10(7) CFU B. fragilis and 10(5) CFU low-virulence E. coli with either trovafloxacin (150 mg/kg/day every 24 hours, days 3 to 7) or moxifloxacin (96 mg/kg/day every 12 hours, days 3 to 7), significantly reduced the number of B. fragilis to 6.9 +/- 0.35 and 5.8 +/- 0.10 and that of E. coli to 4.9 +/- 0.09 and 4.2 +/- 0.07 log CFU/abscess for trovafloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively, compared to controls (B. fragilis 8.7 and E. coli 7.4 log CFU/abscess) on day 8. Also, moxifloxacin was more potent than trovafloxacin. Addition of G-CSF prophylaxis (1 mug once on day -1) or therapy (1 mug/day on days 3 to 7) to fluoroquinolone treatment did not improve the efficacy of fluoroquinolone therapy alone. The effect of moxifloxacin with or without G-CSF prophylaxis on abscesses with a virulent hemolytic E. coli strain was also studied. In moxifloxacin-treated mice, 75% survived infection compared to 10% of controls. Combining moxifloxacin with G-CSF prophylaxis significantly decreased survival (30%) compared to moxifloxacin alone. In addition, G-CSF prophylaxis resulted in a threefold (E. coli) to 100-fold (B. fragilis) increased outgrowth in the abscesses of surviving mice. In conclusion, the addition of G-CSF to a fluoroquinolone is not advisable since, depending on the virulence of the E. coli strains, this might detrimentally influence the outcome of therapy.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has differing effects comparing intravascular versus extravascular models of sepsis

BACKGROUND

Previously, neutrophil stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) pretreatment increased survival rates in canines challenged with intraperitoneal or intrabronchial Escherichia coli and in rats challenged with intrabronchial Staphylococcus aureus. We investigated whether G-CSF pretreatment would be beneficial with intravascular challenge in these models.

METHODS

Animals were randomized to G-CSF or placebo pretreatment followed by intravenous E. coli challenge in canines (n = 24) or intravenous or intrabronchial S. aureus challenge in rats (n = 273). All animals were treated with antibiotics.

RESULTS

In canines, G-CSF before intravenous E. coli did not decrease mortality rates (7 of 12 [58%] G-CSF vs. 5 of 12 [42%] controls), which contrasted with prior reductions during extravascular infection (10 of 35 [29%] G-CSF vs. 37 of 65 [57%] controls). Consistent with the present and previously published studies in canines, in rats, G-CSF decreased mortality rates with intrabronchial S. aureus (22 of 90 [24%] G-CSF vs. 26 of 51 [51%] controls, p = 0.009) but did not decrease them with intravenous infection (34 of 67 [50%] G-CSF vs. 27 of 65 [42%] controls, p = 0.2) in patterns that were very different (p = 0.005 for the effects of G-CSF with intravascular vs. intrabronchial S. aureus).

CONCLUSION

In contrast to extravascular infection, sepsis with intravascular E. coli in canines and S. aureus in rats may not provide a compartmentalized nidus of bacteria on which G-CSF-stimulated neutrophils can exert a beneficial antimicrobial effect. Extrapolated clinically, a proinflammatory agent like G-CSF may be most beneficial with sepsis related primarily to a compartmentalized extravascular site of infection.

Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in experimental methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus sepsis

Background

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the leading pathogenic cause of nosocomial infections, especially in bacteraemia and sepsis. The essential therapy for MRSA infection is glycopeptides. Therapeutic failure can be seen with this therapy and the mortality is still high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional effect of G-CSF on the traditional antibiotic treatment in an experimental MRSA sepsis.

Methods

Experimental sepsis was performed in mice by intraperitoneal injection of MRSA isolate. Inoculum dose was estimated as 6 × 10⁹/ml. Mice were randomised for the study into four group; control group (not receive any therapy), G-CSF group (1000 ng/daily, subcutaneously for 3 d), antibiotic group (vancomycin 25 or 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally every 12 hours for 7 d), and vancomycin+G-CSF group (at the same concentrations and duration). Autopsy was done within one hour after mice died. If mice was still alive at the end of seventh day, they were sacrificed, and autopsy was done. In all groups, the effect of G-CSF therapy on the survival, the number of the MRSA colonies in the lung, liver, heart, spleen, and peritoneal cultures, the histopathology of the lung, liver, heart and spleen was investigated.

Results

One hundred and six mice were used. There were no significant differences in survival rates and bacterial eradication in G-CSF group compared with control group, and also in antibiotic +G-CSF group compared with antibiotic alone group. These parameters were all significantly different in antibiotic alone group compared with control group. Histopathologically, inflammation of the lung and liver were significantly reduced in vancomycin (25 mg/kg)+G-CSF and vancomycin (50 mg/kg)+G-CSF subgroups, respectively (p < 0.01). The histopathological inflammation of the other organs was not significantly different in antibiotic+G-CSF group compared with antibiotic group and, also G-CSF group compared with control group.

Conclusion

G-CSF treatment had no additional effect on survival and bacterial eradication in MRSA sepsis in nonneutropenic mice; and only a little effect on histopathology. G-CSF treatment is very expensive, likewise glycopeptides. The more interest in infection control measures, and prevent the spread of MRSA infections is more rational.

Is there a place for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in non-neutropenic critically ill patients?

Immunoparalysis, characterised by impairments in neutrophil and monocyte/macrophage function, is common in critically ill patients. The theoretical ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to improve the functions of both neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages provides a rationale for G-CSF therapy in non-neutropenic critically ill patients with infection or a high risk of nosocomial infection. The expression of the receptors that mediate G-CSF effects in neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages is regulated by bacterial products, cytokines and endogenous G-CSF levels, accounting for the variables effects of G-CSF on the neutrophil functions of critically ill patients. This variability should be taken into account when designing studies on the use of G-CSF in ICU-patients. Studies are still needed to identify the subset of patients who may benefit from G-CSF therapy.

The hematologic system as a marker of organ dysfunction in sepsis

Sepsis with acute organ dysfunction (severe sepsis) results from a systemic proinflammatory and procoagulant response to infection. Organ dysfunction in the patient with sepsis is associated with increased mortality. Although most organs have discrete anatomical boundaries and carry out unified functions, the hematologic system is poorly circumscribed and serves several unrelated functions. This review addresses the hematologic changes associated with sepsis and provides a framework for prompt diagnosis and rational drug therapy. Data sources used include published research and review articles in the English language related to hematologic alterations in animal models of sepsis and in critically ill patients. Hematologic changes are present in virtually every patient with severe sepsis. Leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and activation of the coagulation cascade are the most common abnormalities. Despite theoretical advantages of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to enhance leukocyte function and/or circulating numbers, large clinical trials with these growth factors are lacking. Recent studies support a reduction in the red blood cell transfusion threshold and the use of erythropoietin treatment to reduce transfusion requirements. Treatment of thrombocytopenia depends on the cause and clinical context but may include platelet transfusions and discontinuation of heparin or other inciting drugs. The use of activated protein C may provide a survival benefit in subsets of patients with severe sepsis. The hematologic system should not be overlooked when assessing a patient with severe sepsis. A thorough clinical evaluation and panel of laboratory tests that relate to this organ system should be as much a part of the work-up as taking the patient's blood pressure, monitoring renal function, or measuring liver enzymes.