Critical environmental limits for young, healthy adults (PSU HEAT Project)

Lower maximal skin wettedness in both warm-humid and hot-dry environments with advanced age (PSU HEAT project)

Maximum skin wettedness (ωmax) is the proportion of the body covered in sweat at the upper limit of compensable heat stress. It has yet to be determined how ωmax changes with aging. We examined variability in ωmax at the upper limit of compensable heat stress in warm-humid (WH) and hot-dry (HD) environments in young (Y, 18-29 yr), middle-aged (MA, 40-60 yr), and older (O, 65-89 yr) adults during minimal activity (MinAct; ∼1.8 METS) and in O subjects at rest. ωmax was calculated using partitional calorimetry for 27 Y (13 F), 27 MA (16 F), and 32 O (18 F) at the previously determined upper limits of compensable heat stress in WH and HD environments. In WH environments, ωmax was greater in Y (0.69 ± 0.12) and MA (0.64 ± 0.20) compared with O (0.47 ± 0.14; both P < 0.05), but not different between Y and MA (P = 0.85). In HD environments, ωmax was greater in Y (0.52 ± 0.05) compared with O adults (0.40 ± 0.07; P < 0.05), but not different between MA (0.48 ± 0.10) and Y or O (both P ≥ 0.15). In O participants at rest, ωmax was lower than MinAct in WH (P < 0.001) but not HD environments. These findings indicate that 1) ωmax is lower with advanced age across environments and 2) is lower at rest than during light activity in O in humid conditions. ωmax established herein for unacclimated adults during activities of daily living and older adults at rest may be used to model heat stress responses for these populations and environments.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to identify 1) maximal skin wettedness values for unacclimated adults across the adult age span of 18 to 89 yr at a metabolic rate representative of minimal activities of daily living and 2) establish specific ωmax values for older adults during rest and activities of daily living. These findings provide empirical data for the modeling of physiological responses to heat stress across the adult age span.

Sex differences in heat stress vulnerability among middle-aged and older adults (PSU HEAT Project)

Individuals over the age of 65 yr are the most vulnerable population during severe environmental heat events, experiencing worse health outcomes than any other age cohort. The risk is greater in older women than in age-matched men; however, whether that reflects a greater susceptibility to heat in women, or simply population sex proportionality, is unclear. Seventy-two participants (29 M/43 F) aged 40-92 yr were exposed to progressive heat stress at a metabolic rate designed to reflect activities of daily living. Experiments were conducted in both hot-dry (HD; up to 53°C; ≤25% rh) and warm-humid (WH; ∼35°C; ≥50% rh) environments. After critical limits were determined for each condition, forward stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were conducted with net metabolic rate (Mnet) and age entered into the model first, followed by sex, body mass (mb), maximal oxygen consumption (V̇o2max), body surface area, and LDL cholesterol. After accounting for Mnet and age, sex further improved the regression model in the HD environment ([Formula: see text] = 0.34, P < 0.001) and the WH environment ([Formula: see text] = 0.36, P < 0.005). Sex explained ∼15% of the variance in critical environmental limits in HD conditions and 12% in WH conditions. Heat compensability curves were shifted leftward for older women, indicating age- and sex-dependent heat vulnerability compared with middle-aged women and older men in WH (P = 0.007, P = 0.03) and HD (P = 0.001, P = 0.01) environments. This reflects the heterogeneity of thermal-balance thresholds associated with aging relative to those seen in young adults and suggests that older females are more vulnerable than their age-matched male counterparts.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In contrast to young adults, there are sex differences in critical environmental limits in middle-aged and older adults. Older women exhibit lower critical environmental limits in both humid and dry extreme environments demonstrated by a leftward shift in heat compensability curves. These data confirm a true sex difference in heat vulnerability of older adults and support the epidemiological mortality data from environmental heat waves.

Coping with extreme heat: current exposure and implications for the future

A preview of how effective behavioral, biological and technological responses might be in the future, when outdoor conditions will be at least 2°C hotter than current levels, is available today from studies of individuals already living in extreme heat. In areas where high temperatures are common-particularly those in the hot and humid tropics-several studies report that indoor temperatures in low-income housing can be significantly hotter than those outdoors. A case study indicates that daily indoor heat indexes in almost all the 123 slum dwellings monitored in Kolkata during the summer were above 41°C (106°F) for at least an hour. Economic constraints make it unlikely that technological fixes, such as air conditioners, will remedy conditions like these-now or in the future. People without access to air conditioning will have to rely on behavioral adjustments and/or biological/physiological acclimatization. One important unknown is whether individuals who have lived their entire lives in hot environments without air conditioning possess natural levels of acclimatization greater than those indicated by controlled laboratory studies. Answering questions about the future will require more studies of heat conditions experienced by individuals, more information on indoor versus outdoor heat conditions, and a greater understanding of the behavioral and biological adjustments made by people living today in extremely hot conditions.

Sex differences in thermophysiological responses of elderly to low-intensity exercise during uncompensable heat strain

PURPOSE

The rising frequency of extreme heat events poses an escalating threat of heat-related illnesses and fatalities, placing an additional strain on global healthcare systems. Whether the risk of heat-related issues is sex specific, particularly among the elderly, remains uncertain.

METHODS

16 men and 15 women of similar age (69 ± 5 years) were exposed to an air temperature of 39.1 ± 0.3 °C and a relative humidity (RH) of 25.1 ± 1.9%, during 20 min of seated rest and at least 40 min of low-intensity (10 W) cycling exercise. RH was gradually increased by 2% every 5 min starting at minute 30. We measured sweat rate, heart rate, thermal sensation, and the rise in gastrointestinal temperature (Tgi) and skin temperature (Tsk).

RESULTS

Tgi consistently increased from minute 30 to 60, with no significant difference between females and males (0.012 ± 0.004 °C/min vs. 0.011 ± 0.005 °C/min; p = 0.64). Similarly, Tsk increase did not differ between females and males (0.044 ± 0.007 °C/min vs. 0.038 ± 0.011 °C/min; p = 0.07). Females exhibited lower sweat rates than males (0.29 ± 0.06 vs. 0.45 ± 0.14 mg/m2/min; p < 0.001) in particular at relative humidities exceeding 30%. No sex differences in heart rate and thermal sensation were observed.

CONCLUSION

Elderly females exhibit significantly lower sweat rates than their male counterparts during low-intensity exercise at ambient temperatures of 39 °C when humidity exceeds 30%. However, both elderly males and females demonstrate a comparable rise in core temperature, skin temperature, and mean body temperature, indicating similar health-related risks associated with heat exposure.

Critical environmental core temperature limits and heart rate thresholds across the adult age span (PSU HEAT Project)

The frequency, duration, and severity of extreme heat events have increased and are projected to continue to increase throughout the next century. As a result, there is an increased risk of excessive heat- and cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality during these extreme heat events. Therefore, the purposes of this investigation were to establish 1) critical environmental core temperature (Tc) limits for middle-aged adults (MA), 2) environmental thresholds that cause heart rate (HR) to progressively rise in MA and older (O) adults, and 3) examine critical environmental Tc limits and HR environmental thresholds across the adult age span. Thirty-three young (Y) (15 F; 23 ± 3 yr), 28 MA (17 F; 51 ± 6 yr), and 31 O (16 F; 70 ± 3 yr) subjects were exposed to progressive heat stress in an environmental chamber in a warm-humid (WH, 34-36°C, 50-90% rh) and a hot-dry (HD, 38°C-52°C, <30% rh) environment while exercising at a low metabolic rate reflecting activities of daily living (∼1.8 METs). In both environments, there was a main effect of age on the critical environmental Tc limit and environmental HR thresholds (main effect of age all P < 0.001). Across the lifespan, critical environmental Tc and HR thresholds decline linearly with age in HD environments (R2 ≥ 0.3) and curvilinearly in WH environments (R2 ≥ 0.4). These data support an age-associated shift in critical environmental Tc limits and HR thresholds toward lower environmental conditions and can be used to develop evidence-based safety guidelines to minimize future heat-related morbidity and mortality across the adult age span.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to identify critical environmental core temperature and heart rate thresholds across the adult age spectrum. In addition, our data demonstrate that the rate of decline in Tc and HR limits with age is environmental-dependent. These findings provide strong empirical data for the development of safety guidelines and policy decisions to mitigate excessive heat- and cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality for impending heat events.

Modeling thermoregulatory responses during high-intensity exercise in warm environments

The six cylinder thermoregulatory model (SCTM) has been validated thoroughly for resting humans. This type of modeling is helpful to predict and develop guidance for safe performance of work and recreational activities. In the context of a warming global climate, updating the accuracy of the model for intense exercise in warm environments will help a wide range of individuals in athletic, recreational, and military settings. Three sets of previously collected data were used to determine SCTM accuracy. Dataset 1: two groups [large (LG) 91.5 kg and small (SM) 67.7 kg] of individuals performed 60 min of semirecumbent cycling in temperate conditions (25.1°C) at metabolic rates of 570-700 W. Dataset 2: two LG (100 kg) and SM (65.8 kg) groups performed 60 min of semirecumbent cycling in warm/hot environmental conditions (36.2°C) at metabolic rates of 590-680 W. Dataset 3: seven volunteers completed 8-km track trials (∼30 min) in cool (17°C) and warm (30°C) environments. The volunteers' metabolic rates were estimated to be 1,268 W and 1,166 W, respectively. For all datasets, SCTM-predicted core temperatures were found to be similar to the observed core temperatures. The root mean square deviations (RMSDs) ranged from 0.06 to 0.46°C with an average of 0.2°C deviation, which is less than the acceptance threshold of 0.5°C. Thus, the present validation shows that SCTM predicts core temperatures with acceptable accuracy during intense exercise in warm environments and successfully captures core temperature differences between large and small individuals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The SCTM has been validated thoroughly for resting humans in warm and cold environments and during water immersion. The present study further demonstrated that SCTM predicts core temperatures with acceptable accuracy during intense exercise up to 1,300 W in temperate and warm environments and captures core temperature differences between large and small individuals. SCTM is potentially useful to develop guidance for safe operation in athletic, military, and occupational settings during exposure to warm or hot environments.

A Novel Conceptual Model for Human Heat Tolerance

Human "heat tolerance" has no accepted definition or physiological underpinnings; rather, it is almost always discussed in relative or comparative terms. We propose to use environmental limits to heat balance accounting for metabolic rate and clothing, that is, the environments for which heat stress becomes uncompensable for a specified metabolic rate and clothing, as a novel metric for quantifying heat tolerance.

Sunscreen does not alter sweating responses or critical environmental limits in young adults (PSU HEAT project)

Outdoor athletes often eschew using sunscreen due to perceived performance impairments, which many attribute in part to the potential for reduced thermoregulatory heat loss. Past studies examining the impact of sunscreen on thermoregulation are equivocal. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of mineral and chemical-based sunscreens on sweating responses and critical environmental limits in hot-dry (HD) and warm-humid (WH) environments. Nine subjects (3 M/6 F; 25 ± 2 yr) were tested with 1) no sunscreen (control), 2) chemical-, and 3) mineral-based sunscreen. Subjects were exposed to progressive heat stress with either 1) constant dry-bulb temperature (Tdb) at 34°C and increasing water vapor pressure (Pa) (WH trials) or 2) constant Pa at 12 mmHg and increasing Tdb (HD trials). Subjects walked at 4.9 ± 0.5 metabolic equivalents (METs) until an upward inflection in gastrointestinal temperature was observed (i.e., the critical environmental limit). Compared with control (39.9 ± 3.0°C), critical Tdb was not different in mineral (39.2 ± 3.5°C, P = 0.39) or chemical (39.7 ± 3.0°C, P = 0.98) sunscreen trials in HD environments. Compared with control (18.8 ± 4.0 mmHg), critical Pa was not different in mineral (18.9 ± 4.8 mmHg, P = 0.81) or chemical (19.5 ± 4.6 mmHg, P = 0.81) sunscreen trials in WH environments. Sweating rates, evaporative heat loss, skin wettedness, and sweating efficiency were not different among the three trials in the WH (all P ≥ 0.48) or HD (all P ≥ 0.87) environments. Critical environmental limits are unaffected by sunscreen application, suggesting sunscreen does not alter integrative thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our findings demonstrate that neither sweating nor critical environmental limits were affected by mineral-based and chemical-based sunscreen applications. The rates of change in core temperature during compensable and uncompensable heat stress were not changed by wearing sunscreen. Evaporative heat loss, efficiency of sweat evaporation, skin wettedness, and sweating rates were unaffected by sunscreen. Sunscreen did not alter integrative thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat.

Heat stress vulnerability and critical environmental limits for older adults

The present study examined heat stress vulnerability of apparently healthy older vs. young adults and characterized critical environmental limits for older adults in an indoor setting at rest (Rest) and during minimal activity associated with activities of daily living. Critical environmental limits are combinations of ambient temperature and humidity above which heat balance cannot be maintained (i.e., becomes uncompensable) for a given metabolic heat production. Here we exposed fifty-one young (23±4 yrs) and 49 older (71±6 yrs) adults to progressive heat stress across a wide range of environments in an environmental chamber during Minimal Activity (young and older subjects) and Rest (older adults only). Heat compensability curves were shifted leftward for older adults indicating age-dependent heat vulnerablity (p < 0.01). During Minimal Activity, critical environmental limits were lower in older compared to young adults (p < 0.0001) and lower than those at Rest (p < 0.0001). These data document heat vulnerability of apparently healthy older adults and to define critical environmental limits for indoor settings in older adults at rest and during activities of daily living, and can be used to develop evidence-based recommendations to minimize the deleterious impacts of extreme heat events in this population.

A physiological approach for assessing human survivability and liveability to heat in a changing climate

Most studies projecting human survivability limits to extreme heat with climate change use a 35 °C wet-bulb temperature (Tw) threshold without integrating variations in human physiology. This study applies physiological and biophysical principles for young and older adults, in sun or shade, to improve current estimates of survivability and introduce liveability (maximum safe, sustained activity) under current and future climates. Our physiology-based survival limits show a vast underestimation of risks by the 35 °C Tw model in hot-dry conditions. Updated survivability limits correspond to Tw~25.8-34.1 °C (young) and ~21.9-33.7 °C (old)-0.9-13.1 °C lower than Tw = 35 °C. For older female adults, estimates are ~7.2-13.1 °C lower than 35 °C in dry conditions. Liveability declines with sun exposure and humidity, yet most dramatically with age (2.5-3.0 METs lower for older adults). Reductions in safe activity for younger and older adults between the present and future indicate a stronger impact from aging than warming.

Distribution of upper limit of the prescriptive zone values for acclimatized and unacclimatized individuals

Heat stress has an adverse impact on worker health and well-being, and the effects will increase with more frequent and severe heat events associated with global warming. Acclimatization to heat stress is widely considered to be a critical mitigation strategy and wet bulb globe temperature- (WBGT-) based occupational standards and guidelines contain adjustments for acclimatization. The purpose here was to 1) compare the mean values for the upper limit of the prescriptive zone (ULPZ, below which the rise in core temperature is minimal) between unacclimatized and acclimatized men and women; 2) demonstrate that the change in the occupational exposure limit (ΔOEL) due to acclimatization is independent of metabolic rate; 3) examine the relation between ΔOEL and body surface area (BSA); and 4) compare the exposure-response curves between unacclimatized and acclimatized populations. Empirically derived ULPZ data for unacclimatized participants from Pennsylvania State University (PSU) and acclimatized participants from University of South Florida (USF) were used to explore the difference between unacclimatized and acclimatized heat exposure limits. The findings provide support for a constant 3°C WBGT OEL decrease to account for unacclimatized workers. Body surface area explained part of the difference in ULPZ values between men and women. In addition, the pooled PSU and USF data provide insight into the distribution of individual values for the ULPZ among young, healthy unacclimatized and acclimatized populations in support of occupational heat stress guidelines.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Occupational exposure limit guidelines using wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) distinguish between acclimatized and unacclimatized workers with about a 3°C difference between them. For the first time, empirical data from two laboratories provide support for acclimatization state adjustments. Using a constant difference rather than increasing differences with metabolic rate better describes the limit for unacclimatized participants. Furthermore, the lower upper limit of the prescriptive zone (ULPZ) values set forth for women do not relate to fitness level but are partly explained by their smaller body surface area (BSA). An examination of individual ULPZ values suggests that many unacclimatized individuals should be able to sustain safe work at the exposure limit for acclimatized workers.

Core temperature and heart rate at the upper limit of the prescriptive zone

The expressed goal of limiting workplace heat stress exposures to a core temperature (Tc ) of 38°C traces back to a 1969 World Health Organization Technical Report (WHO Series 412). The actual goal was to limit exposures to the upper limit of the prescriptive zone (ULPZ). To explore the physiological strain at the ULPZ, progressive heat stress protocol data from Penn State University (PSU) and University of South Florida (USF) below and at the ULPZ were used to articulate the relation of Tc and heart rate (HR) to metabolic rate (MR) with consideration of acclimatization state, clothing, exposure condition (PreULPZ vs. ULPZ), and sex. Regression models demonstrated the association of MR and sex with Tc and HR. At the ULPZ, women had systematically higher values of Tc and HR than men at the same MR likely due to higher relative demands. There was no effect for acclimatization state and clothing. As expected for individuals, Tc was practically constant below the ULPZ and HR exhibited increasing values approaching the ULPZ. At 490 W, the high MR cited in the WHO document, the mean Tc for men was near the 38°C limit with systematically lower Tc at lower MRs.

Onset of cardiovascular drift during progressive heat stress in young adults (PSU HEAT project)

With climate change, humans are at a greater risk for heat-related morbidity and mortality, often secondary to increased cardiovascular strain associated with an elevated core temperature (Tc). Critical environmental limits (i.e., the upper limits of compensable heat stress) have been established based on Tc responses for healthy, young individuals. However, specific environmental limits for the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis have not been investigated in the context of thermal strain during light activity. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to 1) identify the specific environmental conditions (combinations of ambient temperature and water vapor pressure) at which cardiovascular drift [i.e., a continuous rise in heart rate (HR)] began to occur and 2) compare those environments to the environmental limits for the maintenance of heat balance. Fifty-one subjects (27 F; 23 ± 4 yr) were exposed to progressive heat stress across a wide range of environmental conditions in an environmental chamber at two low metabolic rates reflecting minimal activity (MinAct; 159 ± 34 W) or light ambulation (LightAmb; 260 ± 55 W). Whether systematically increasing ambient temperature or humidity, the onset of cardiovascular drift occurred at lower environmental conditions compared with Tc inflection points at both intensities (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the time at which cardiovascular drift began preceded the time of Tc inflection (MinAct P = 0.01; LightAmb P = 0.0002), and the difference in time between HR and Tc inflection points did not differ (MinAct P = 0.08; LightAmb P = 0.06) across environmental conditions for either exercise intensity. These data suggest that even in young adults, increases in cardiovascular strain precede the point at which heat stress becomes uncompensable during light activity.NEW & NOTEWORTHY To our knowledge, this study is the first to 1) identify the specific combinations of temperature and humidity at which an increase in cardiovascular strain (cardiovascular drift) occurs and 2) compare those environments to the critical environmental limits for the maintenance of heat balance. We additionally examined the difference in time between the onset of increased cardiovascular strain and uncompensable heat stress. We show that an increase in cardiovascular strain systematically precedes sustained heat storage in young adults.

Relatively minor influence of individual characteristics on critical wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) limits during light activity in young adults (PSU HEAT Project)

Critical environmental limits are temperature-humidity thresholds above which heat balance cannot be maintained for a given metabolic heat production. This study examined the association between individual characteristics [sex, body surface area (AD), aerobic capacity (V̇o2max), and body mass (mb)] and critical environmental limits in young adults at low metabolic rates. Forty-four (20 M/24 F; 23 ± 4 yr) subjects were exposed to progressive heat stress in an environmental chamber at two low net metabolic rates (Mnet); minimal activity (MinAct; Mnet = ∼160 W) and light ambulation (LightAmb; Mnet = ∼260 W). In two hot-dry (HD; ≤25% rh) environments, ambient water vapor pressure (Pa = 12 or 16 mmHg) was held constant and dry-bulb temperature (Tdb) was systematically increased. In two warm-humid (WH; ≥50% rh) environments, Tdb was held constant at 34°C or 36°C, and Pa was systematically increased. The critical wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGTcrit) was determined for each condition. During MinAct, after entry of Mnet into the forward stepwise linear regression model, no individual characteristics were entered into the model for WH (R2adj = 0.01, P = 0.27) or HD environments (R2adj = -0.01, P = 0.44). During LightAmb, only mb was entered into the model for WH environments (R2adj = 0.44, P < 0.001), whereas only V̇o2max was entered for HD environments (R2adj = 0.22; P = 0.002). These data demonstrate negligible importance of individual characteristics on WBGTcrit during low-intensity nonweight-bearing (MinAct) activity with a modest impact of mb and V̇o2max during weight-bearing (LightAmb) activity in extreme thermal environments.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our laboratory has recently published a series of papers establishing the upper ambient temperature-humidity thresholds for maintaining heat balance, termed critical environmental limits, in young adults. However, no studies have investigated the relative influence of individual characteristics, such as sex, body size, and aerobic fitness, on those environmental limits. Here, we demonstrate the contributions of sex, body mass, body surface area, and maximal aerobic capacity on critical wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) limits in young adults.

Critical Environmental Limits for Human Thermoregulation in the Context of a Changing Climate

Human-caused climate change has increased the average temperature of the Earth by over 1°C since the 19th century with larger increases expected by 2100 due to continued human influence. This change in mean ambient temperature has had nonlinear effects, resulting in more high temperature extremes, i.e., heat waves, that have increased in frequency, duration, and magnitude. Additional occurrences of humid heatwaves have significantly affected human health due to the physiological strain associated with a relative inability for evaporative cooling. Inability to efficaciously cool the body, whether during passive heat exposure or physical activity, not only leads to elevated core temperatures but also places strain on the cardiovascular system, often exacerbating age-related co-morbidities. As part of the PSU HEAT (Pennsylvania State University - Human Environmental Age Thresholds) Project, a progressive environmental strain protocol has been developed to determine critical environmental limits - combinations of ambient temperature and humidity -- associated with uncompensable heat stress and intractable rises in core temperature (Tc). These human heat balance thresholds, well below those originally theorized by climatologists, have been surpassed in recent heatwaves and be exceeded on a more regular basis in the future, providing additional impetus to the urgency of adaptative measures and climate change mitigation.

Predicting fatal heat and humidity using the heat index model

A unique wet-bulb temperature of 35°C is often used as the threshold for human survivability, but recent experiments have shown that a person's core temperature starts to rise at a wide range of critical wet-bulb temperatures. Here, it is shown that the model underlying the heat index correctly predicts those critical wet-bulb temperatures, explaining 95% of the variance in the values observed in laboratory heat-stress experiments. This is the first time the heat-index model has been validated against physiological data from laboratory experiments. For light and moderate exertion in an indoor setting, the heat index model predicts that the critical wet-bulb temperature ranges from 20°C to 32°C, depending on the relative humidity, consistent with experimental results. For the same setting and exertion, the heat index model predicts fatal wet-bulb temperatures ranging from 24°C to 37°C.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent experiments have identified the critical combinations of heat and humidity, in an indoor setting, above which an individual is unable to maintain a standard core temperature, indicating severe heat stress. It is shown here why this state of severe heat stress cannot be predicted using the wet-bulb temperature. Instead, it is shown that the recently extended heat index model can explain nearly all of the variance in the observed critical combinations of temperature and humidity, and can be used to calculate fatal combinations.

Adverse heat-health outcomes and critical environmental limits (Pennsylvania State University Human Environmental Age Thresholds project)

BACKGROUND

The earth's climate is warming and the frequency, duration, and severity of heat waves are increasing. Meanwhile, the world's population is rapidly aging. Epidemiological data demonstrate exponentially greater increases in morbidity and mortality during heat waves in adults ≥65 years. Laboratory data substantiate the mechanistic underpinnings of age-associated differences in thermoregulatory function. However, the specific combinations of environmental conditions (i.e., ambient temperature and absolute/relative humidity) above which older adults are at increased risk of heat-related morbidity and mortality are less clear.

METHODS

This review was conducted to (1) examine the recent (past 3 years) literature regarding heat-related morbidity and mortality in the elderly and discuss projections of future heat-related morbidity and mortality based on climate model data, and (2) detail the background and unique methodology of our ongoing laboratory-based projects aimed toward identifying the specific environmental conditions that result in elevated risk of heat illness in older adults, and the implications of using the data toward the development of evidence-based safety interventions in a continually-warming climate (PSU HEAT; Human Environmental Age Thresholds).

RESULTS

The recent literature demonstrates that extreme heat continues to be increasingly detrimental to the health of the elderly and that this is apparent across the world, although the specific environmental conditions above which older adults are at increased risk of heat-related morbidity and mortality remain unclear.

CONCLUSION

Characterizing the environmental conditions above which risk of heat-related illnesses increase remains critical to enact policy decisions and mitigation efforts to protect vulnerable people during extreme heat events.

Core temperature responses to compensable versus uncompensable heat stress in young adults (PSU HEAT Project)

With global warming, much attention has been paid to the upper limits of human adaptability. However, the time to reach a generally accepted core temperature criterion (40.2°C) associated with heat-related illness above (uncompensable heat stress) and just below (compensable heat stress) the upper limits for heat balance remains unclear. Forty-eight (22 men/26 women; 23 ± 4 yr) subjects were exposed to progressive heat stress in an environmental chamber during minimal activity (MinAct, 159 ± 34 W) and light ambulation (LightAmb, 260 ± 55 W) in warm-humid (WH; ∼35°C, >60% RH) and hot-dry (HD; 43°C-48°C, <25% RH) environments until heat stress became uncompensable. For each condition, we compared heat storage (S) and the change in gastrointestinal temperature (ΔTgi) over time during compensable and uncompensable heat stress. In addition, we examined whether individual characteristics or seasonality were associated with the rate of increase in Tgi. During compensable heat stress, S was higher in HD than in WH environments (P < 0.05) resulting in a greater but more variable ΔTgi (P ≥ 0.06) for both metabolic rates. There were no differences among conditions during uncompensable heat stress (all P > 0.05). There was no influence of sex, aerobic fitness, or seasonality, but a larger body size was associated with a greater ΔTgi during LightAmb in WH (P = 0.003). The slopes of the Tgi response during compensable (WH: MinAct, 0.06, LightAmb, 0.09; HD: MinAct, 0.12, LightAmb, 0.15°C/h) and uncompensable (WH: MinAct, 0.74, LightAmb, 0.87; HD: MinAct, 0.71, LightAmb, 0.93°C/h) heat stress can be used to estimate the time to reach a target core temperature from any given starting value.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to examine heat storage and the rate of change in core temperature above (uncompensable heat stress) and just below (compensable heat stress) critical environmental limits to human heat balance. Furthermore, we examine the influence of individual subject characteristics and seasonality on the change in core temperature in warm-humid versus hot-dry environments. We provide the rate of change in core temperature, enabling projections to be made to and from any hypothetical core temperature.

Utility of the Heat Index in defining the upper limits of thermal balance during light physical activity (PSU HEAT Project)

Extreme heat events and consequent detrimental heat-health outcomes have been increasing in recent decades and are expected to continue with future climate warming. While many indices have been created to quantify the combined atmospheric contributions to heat, few have been validated to determine how index-defined heat conditions impact human health. However, this subset of indices is likely not valid for all situations and populations nor easily understood and interpreted by health officials and the public. In this study, we compare the ability of thresholds determined from the National Weather Service's (NWS) Heat Index (HI), the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), and the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) to predict the compensability of human heat stress (upper limits of heat balance) measured as part of the Pennsylvania State University's Heat Environmental Age Thresholds (PSU HEAT) project. While the WBGT performed the best of the three indices for both minimal activities of daily living (MinAct; 83 W·m-2) and light ambulation (LightAmb; 133 W·m-2) in a cohort of young, healthy subjects, HI was likewise accurate in predicting heat stress compensability in MinAct conditions. HI was significantly correlated with subjects' perception of temperature and humidity as well as their body core temperature, linking perception of the ambient environment with physiological responses in MinAct conditions. Given the familiarity the public has with HI, it may be better utilized in the expansion of safeguard policies and the issuance of heat warnings during extreme heat events, especially when access to engineered cooling strategies is unavailable.

Validity and reliability of a protocol to establish human critical environmental limits (PSU HEAT Project)

The PSU HEAT protocol has been used to determine critical environmental limits, i.e., those combinations of ambient temperature and humidity above which heat stress becomes uncompensable and core temperature rises continuously. However, no studies have rigorously investigated the reliability and validity of this experimental protocol. Here, we assessed the 1) between-visit reliability and 2) validity of the paradigm. Twelve subjects (5 M/7W; 25 ± 4 yr) completed a progressive heat stress protocol during which they walked on a treadmill (2.2 mph, 3% gradient) in a controllable environmental chamber. After an equilibration period, either dry-bulb temperature (T_db) was increased every 5 min while ambient water vapor pressure (P_a) was held constant (T_crit experiments) or P_a was increased every 5 min while T_db was held constant (P_crit experiments) until an upward inflection in gastrointestinal temperature (T_gi) was observed. For reliability experiments, 11 subjects repeated the same protocol on a different day. For validity experiments, 10 subjects performed a T_crit experiment at their previously determined P_crit or vice versa. The between-visit reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) for critical environmental limits was 0.98. Similarly, there was excellent agreement between original and validity trials for T_crit (ICC = 0.95) and P_crit (ICC = 0.96). Furthermore, the wet-bulb temperature at the T_gi inflection point was not different during reliability (P = 0.78) or validity (P = 0.32) trials compared with original trials. These findings support the reliability and validity of this experimental paradigm for the determination of critical environmental limits for maintenance of human heat balance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The PSU HEAT progressive heat stress protocol has been used to identify critical environmental limits for various populations, clothing ensembles, and metabolic intensities. However, no studies have rigorously investigated the reliability and validity of this experimental model. Here, we demonstrate excellent reliability and validity of the PSU HEAT protocol.

Evaluating the 35°C wet-bulb temperature adaptability threshold for young, healthy subjects (PSU HEAT Project)

A wet-bulb temperature of 35°C has been theorized to be the limit to human adaptability to extreme heat, a growing concern in the face of continued and predicted accelerated climate change. Although this theorized threshold is based in physiological principles, it has not been tested using empirical data. This study examined the critical wet-bulb temperature (T_wb,crit) at which heat stress becomes uncompensable in young, healthy adults performing tasks at modest metabolic rates mimicking basic activities of daily life. Across six experimentally determined environmental limits, no subject's T_wb,crit reached the 35°C limit and all means were significantly lower than the theoretical 35°C threshold. Mean T_wb,crit values were relatively constant across 36°C -40°C humid environments and averaged 30.55 ± 0.98°C but progressively decreased (higher deviation from 35°C) in hotter, dry ambient environments. T_wb,crit was significantly associated with mean skin temperature (and a faster warming rate of the skin) due to larger increases in dry heat gain in the hot-dry environments. As sweat rates did not significantly differ among experimental environments, evaporative cooling was outpaced by dry heat gain in hot-dry conditions, causing larger deviations from the theoretical 35°C adaptability threshold. In summary, a wet-bulb temperature threshold cannot be applied to human adaptability across all climatic conditions and where appropriate (high humidity), that threshold is well below 35°C.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to use empirical physiological observations to examine the well-publicized theoretical 35°C wet-bulb temperature limit for human to extreme environments. We find that uncompensable heat stress in humid environments occurs in young, healthy adults at wet-bulb temperatures significantly lower than 35°C. In addition, uncompensable heat stress occurs at widely different wet-bulb temperatures as a function of ambient vapor pressure.