Ultrasound assessment of popliteal vein compliance during a short deflation protocol

Effects of hypoxia and hyperoxia on venous capacity and compliance in healthy men and women

Blood oxygen is an important modulator of arterial function, but its impact on peripheral venous function is incompletely understood. Herein, we sought to determine the effect of hypoxia and hyperoxia on venous capacity and compliance in the lower limb. In 16 healthy individuals (7 women; age: 28.3 ± 7.6 yr, mean ± SD), we assessed peripheral oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]), the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV; Doppler ultrasound), and calf volume (strain-gauge plethysmography) during a standard 60 mmHg thigh cuff inflation-deflation protocol. Separate trials were undertaken during breathing of room air, hypoxia [fraction in inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]): 0.10], and hyperoxia ([Formula: see text]: 0.50), according to a single-blinded, randomized design. Lower limb pressure-CSA and pressure-volume relationships were modeled using a quadratic regression equation and compliance derived. [Formula: see text] was decreased by hypoxia (83.6 ± 5.6%) and increased by hyperoxia (98.7 ± 0.5%) compared with room air (96.4 ± 1.0%, P < 0.001). Compared with room air (17.0 ± 7.9 mm2), hypoxia decreased GSV CSA (13.4 ± 5.7 mm2, P < 0.001), whereas no change was observed with hyperoxia (17.1 ± 8.7 mm2, P = 0.883). GSV compliance derived from the pressure-CSA relationships was elevated approximately twofold with hyperoxia (-0.0061 ± 0.0046 a.u.) when compared with room air (-0.0029 ± 0.002 a.u., P = 0.027) and hypoxia (-0.0030 ± 0.0032 a.u., P = 0.007). No differences were observed in calf pressure-volume parameters with either hypoxia or hyperoxia (P > 0.05). Our data indicate that GSV capacity is reduced by hypoxia, and that GSV compliance is increased by hyperoxia, thus highlighting the often overlooked role of oxygen in the regulation of venous circulation.

A review of methodologies evaluating superficial vein properties in viv: focus on compliance and reactivity

The saphenous vein (SV) is a hindlimb superficial vein which has aroused a considerable interest because of its implication in chronic venous disease and its use in coronary artery or lower limb bypass grafts. The morphology and patency of the SV are commonly assessed for diagnosis and management, but the dynamic properties of the vein - compliance, elasticity and reactivity, less widely studied, are also fundamental issues. The subject of this review is neither to review the pathologies, nor the treatments or surgical procedures. The goal is to gather together all existing types of investigation on the superficial vein and to focus on the dynamic venous properties in vivo. The data collected indicate that plethysmography (PG) and ultrasound (US) are extensively used to evaluate SV patency, reflux and morphology. Their use to evaluate superficial vein compliance is less widespread but highly necessary. The protocols used via venous occlusion are described and the various parameters used to accurately measure compliance and distensibility versus elasticity are presented and discussed. The advantage of US diameter measurement is shown, including additional pulsatile compliance evaluation. The overview of venous reactivity greatly differs, being poorly studied in vivo, mainly by optical methods in humans or US echotracking in animals. Existing methodologies are potent but could be certainly developed and improved further for better characterization of the SV in human and for investigations of new devices, surgical techniques and pharmacological treatment in preclinical animal studies.

Compliance in the deep and superficial conduit veins of the nonexercising arm is unaffected by short-term exercise

The effects of short-term dynamic and static exercise on compliance (CPL) in a single conduit vein in the nonexercising limb are not fully understood, although prolonged cycling exercise was found to produce a significant reduction of CPL in the veins. In this study, we investigated the cross-sectional area (CSA) and CPL in the brachial (deep) and basilic (superficial) veins of the nonexercising arm in 14 participants who performed a 5-min cycling exercise at 35% and 70% of peak oxygen uptake (study 1) and in 11 participants who performed a 2-min static handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (study 2). The CSA in the deep and superficial veins at rest and during the final minute of exercise was measured by high-resolution ultrasonography during a short-duration cuff deflation protocol. The CPL in each vein was calculated as the numerical derivative of the cuff pressure and CSA curve. During short-term dynamic and static exercise, there was no change in CPL in either vein, but there was a decrease in CSA in both veins. The simultaneous findings of unchanged CPL and decreased CSA suggest that CPL during short-term exercise are independently controlled by the mechanisms responsible for exercise-induced sympathoexcitation in both single veins. Thus, short-term exercise does not alter CPL in both conduit superficial and deep veins in nonexercising upper arm.

Decreased compliance in the deep and superficial conduit veins of the upper arm during prolonged cycling exercise

We examined whether there is a difference in compliance between the deep and superficial conduit veins of the upper arm in response to prolonged exercise. Eight young men performed cycling exercise at 60% of peak oxygen uptake until rectal temperature had been increased by 1.1°C for 38–48 min. The cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the brachial (deep) and basilic (superficial) veins was assessed by ultrasound during a cuff deflation protocol. Compliance (CPL) was calculated as the numerical derivative of the cuff pressure and CSA curve. During prolonged exercise, CPL in both conduit veins was similarly decreased when compared with pre‐exercise values; however, the CSA decreased in the deep vein but increased in the superficial vein. In addition, passive heating caused an analogous change in CSA and CPL of superficial vein when compared with prolonged exercise, but did not change CSA and CPL of deep vein. Cold pressor test induced the decreased CSA of deep and superficial veins without the alteration of CPL of both veins. These results suggest that CPL in the deep and superficial conduit veins adjusts to prolonged exercise via different mechanisms.

Tendon vibration attenuates superficial venous vessel response of the resting limb during static arm exercise

BACKGROUND

The superficial vein of the resting limb constricts sympathetically during exercise. Central command is the one of the neural mechanisms that controls the cardiovascular response to exercise. However, it is not clear whether central command contributes to venous vessel response during exercise. Tendon vibration during static elbow flexion causes primary muscle spindle afferents, such that a lower central command is required to achieve a given force without altering muscle force. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate whether a reduction in central command during static exercise with tendon vibration influences the superficial venous vessel response in the resting limb.

METHODS

Eleven subjects performed static elbow flexion at 35% of maximal voluntary contraction with (EX + VIB) and without (EX) vibration of the biceps brachii tendon. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in overall and exercising muscle were measured. The cross-sectional area (CSAvein) and blood velocity of the basilic vein in the resting upper arm were assessed by ultrasound, and blood flow (BFvein) was calculated using both variables.

RESULTS

Muscle tension during exercise was similar between EX and EX + VIB. However, RPEs at EX + VIB were lower than those at EX (P <0.05). Increases in heart rate and mean arterial pressure during exercise at EX + VIB were also lower than those at EX (P <0.05). CSAvein in the resting limb at EX decreased during exercise from baseline (P <0.05), but CSAvein at EX + VIB did not change during exercise. CSAvein during exercise at EX was smaller than that at EX + VIB (P <0.05). However, BFvein did not change during the protocol under either condition. The decreases in circulatory response and RPEs during EX + VIB, despite identical muscle tension, showed that activation of central command was less during EX + VIB than during EX. Abolishment of the decrease in CSAvein during exercise at EX + VIB may thus have been caused by a lower level of central command at EX + VIB rather than EX.

CONCLUSION

Diminished central command induced by tendon vibration may attenuate the superficial venous vessel response of the resting limb during sustained static arm exercise.

Limb venous tone and responsiveness in hypertensive humans

Hypertensive (HTN) animal models demonstrate lower venous compliance as well as increased venous tone and responsiveness compared with normotensive (NTN) controls. However, the extent to which findings in experimental animals can be extended to humans is unknown. Forearm and calf venous compliance were quantified in 9 NTN (23 +/- 1 yr) and 9 HTN (24 +/- 1 yr) men at baseline, after administration of nitroglycerin (NTG), during a cold pressor test (CP), and post-handgrip exercise ischemia (PEI). Individual pressure-volume relationships from a cuff deflation protocol (1 mmHg/s) were modeled with a quadratic regression. Regression parameters beta(1) and beta(2) were used to calculate compliance. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the beta parameters and a repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare volumes across all pressures (between groups at baseline and within groups during perturbations). Limb venous compliance was similar between groups (forearm: NTN beta(1) = 0.11 +/- 0.01 and beta(2) = -0.00097 +/- 0.0001, HTN beta(1) = 0.10 +/- 0.01 and beta(2) = -0.00088 +/- 0.0001; calf: NTN beta(1) = 0.12 +/- 0.01 and beta(2) = -0.00102 +/- 0.0001, HTN beta(1) = 0.11 +/- 0.01 and beta(2) = -0.00090 +/- 0.0001). However, at baseline, volume across all pressures (i.e., capacitance) was lower in the forearm (P < or = 0.01) and tended to be lower in the calf (P = 0.08) in HTN subjects. Venous compliance was not altered by any perturbation in either group. Forearm volume was increased during NTG in HTN subjects only. While venous compliance was similar between NTN and HTN adults, HTN adults have lower forearm venous capacitance (volume) which is increased with NTG. These data suggest that young HTN adults may have augmented venous smooth muscle tone compared with NTN controls.